Is headspace making a difference to young people’s lives?

Evaluation-of-headspace-program Evaluation-of-headspace-program

05.12.2016 Views

List of Figures Figure 3.1 Number of clients by centre round, 2013/14 19 Figure 3.2 Number of headspace clients per 1,000 population by age, 2013/14 21 Figure 3.3 Figure 3.4 Figure 3.5 Figure 3.6 Average K10 score at presentation by age, sex-and sexuality, headspace clients 2013/14 24 Average SOFAS scores at presentation by age and gender, headspace clients 2013/14 25 Average SOFAS scores at presentation by age and gendersexuality group, headspace clients 2013/14 26 Average SOFAS scores at presentation by age and Indigenous status, headspace clients 2013/14 26 Figure 3.7 Client reported main reason for first visit to headspace, 2013/14 27 Figure 3.8 Main problem with how clients feel at the first visit, 2013/14 27 Figure 3.9 Figure 3.10 Primary presenting issue of clients as assessed by service providers at the first visit, 2013/14 29 Distribution of headspace clients by travel distance to headspace centre 32 Figure 3.11 Where parents/carers sought further information about headspace 36 Figure 4.1 K10 changes by commencing K10 group (%) 43 Figure 4.2 Figure 4.3 Figure 4.4 Figure 4.5 Figure 4.6 Figure 4.7 Figure 4.8 Cumulative average change in K10 scores - by the primary issue the young person presented with at initial consultation and total number of visits 44 Changes in K10 score between first and last headspace treatment: FEMALE clients, by age 46 Changes in K10 score between first and last headspace treatment: MALE clients, by age 47 Average K10 score by visit number and total number of occasions of service 48 Proportion of headspace clients showing clinically (CS) or reliably (RS) significant improvement in K10, by age and occasion of service (OoS) interval 49 Percentage of headspace clients who considered suicide in the last year, by K10 change and intervention survey wave 50 Change in prevalence of suicidal thoughts between waves, by gender and K10 change 51 Social Policy Research Centre 2015 headspace Evaluation Final Report v

Figure 4.9 Figure 4.10 Figure 4.11 Figure 4.12 Figure 4.13 Figure 4.14 Figure 4.15 Figure 4.16 Figure 4.17 Figure 4.18 Percentage of headspace clients who self-harmed in between waves, by K10 change and intervention survey wave 51 Prevalence of self-harm in the last year across grouped K10 changes: by intervention survey wave and gender 52 Number of days lost in last four weeks due to psychological distress, by K10 change and OoS interval 52 Number of days in last four weeks cut down due to psychological distress, by K10 change and OoS interval 53 Social inclusion indicators among headspace clients, by gender and intervention survey wave 54 Cumulative average of individual SOFAS changes by gender and total number of visits 55 Cumulative average of individual SOFAS differences by gendersexuality and total number of visits 55 Cumulative average of change in individual SOFAS scores - by the primary issue at initial consultation and total number of visits 56 Proportion of young people who transitioned in SOFAS classification bands from first to last occasion of service by gender-sexuality 58 Proportion of young people who transitioned in SOFAS classification bands from first to last occasion of service by total number of visits 58 Figure 5.1 Access to supports/services for parents/carers at headspace 82 Figure 5.2 Proportion of headspace clients that received support from eheadspace, 2013/14 84 Figure 5.3 Usefulness of range of headspace components (n=29) 88 Figure 5.4 Direct funding source for headspace occasions of service 89 Figure 5.5 headspace clients with a formal referral at first visit, 2013/14 90 Figure 5.6 Figure 5.7 Figure 5.8 Figure 5.9 Figure 5.10 Figure 5.11 Proportion of headspace clients with formal referral at the first visit by state, 2013/14 91 GP referral of young patients to services within the last 12 months (n=43) 94 GP referral of young patients to services within the last 12 months (respondent numbers) 96 Strategies implemented to transition clients from headspace to adult service 98 Level of satisfaction with liaison and collaboration to transition client 98 Extent to which young person was supported by headspace during transition 99 Figure 6.1 Main type of service provided at each visit, 2013/14 financial year 102 Figure 6.2 Direct funding source for headspace occasions of service, 2013/14 financial year 105 Social Policy Research Centre 2015 headspace Evaluation Final Report vi

Figure 4.9<br />

Figure 4.10<br />

Figure 4.11<br />

Figure 4.12<br />

Figure 4.13<br />

Figure 4.14<br />

Figure 4.15<br />

Figure 4.16<br />

Figure 4.17<br />

Figure 4.18<br />

Percentage of <strong>headspace</strong> clients who self-harmed in between<br />

waves, by K10 change and intervention survey wave 51<br />

Prevalence of self-harm in the last year across grouped K10<br />

changes: by intervention survey wave and gender 52<br />

Number of days lost in last four weeks due <strong>to</strong> psychological<br />

distress, by K10 change and OoS interval 52<br />

Number of days in last four weeks cut down due <strong>to</strong> psychological<br />

distress, by K10 change and OoS interval 53<br />

Social inclusion indica<strong>to</strong>rs among <strong>headspace</strong> clients, by gender<br />

and intervention survey wave 54<br />

Cumulative average of individual SOFAS changes by gender and<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal number of visits 55<br />

Cumulative average of individual SOFAS <strong>difference</strong>s by gendersexuality<br />

and <strong>to</strong>tal number of visits 55<br />

Cumulative average of change in individual SOFAS scores - by the<br />

primary issue at initial consultation and <strong>to</strong>tal number of visits 56<br />

Proportion of <strong>young</strong> people who transitioned in SOFAS<br />

classification bands from first <strong>to</strong> last occasion of service by<br />

gender-sexuality 58<br />

Proportion of <strong>young</strong> people who transitioned in SOFAS<br />

classification bands from first <strong>to</strong> last occasion of service by <strong>to</strong>tal<br />

number of visits 58<br />

Figure 5.1 Access <strong>to</strong> supports/services for parents/carers at <strong>headspace</strong> 82<br />

Figure 5.2<br />

Proportion of <strong>headspace</strong> clients that received support from<br />

e<strong>headspace</strong>, 2013/14 84<br />

Figure 5.3 Usefulness of range of <strong>headspace</strong> components (n=29) 88<br />

Figure 5.4 Direct funding source for <strong>headspace</strong> occasions of service 89<br />

Figure 5.5 <strong>headspace</strong> clients with a formal referral at first visit, 2013/14 90<br />

Figure 5.6<br />

Figure 5.7<br />

Figure 5.8<br />

Figure 5.9<br />

Figure 5.10<br />

Figure 5.11<br />

Proportion of <strong>headspace</strong> clients with formal referral at the first visit<br />

by state, 2013/14 91<br />

GP referral of <strong>young</strong> patients <strong>to</strong> services within the last 12 months<br />

(n=43) 94<br />

GP referral of <strong>young</strong> patients <strong>to</strong> services within the last 12 months<br />

(respondent numbers) 96<br />

Strategies implemented <strong>to</strong> transition clients from <strong>headspace</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

adult service 98<br />

Level of satisfaction with liaison and collaboration <strong>to</strong> transition<br />

client 98<br />

Extent <strong>to</strong> which <strong>young</strong> person was supported by <strong>headspace</strong><br />

during transition 99<br />

Figure 6.1 Main type of service provided at each visit, 2013/14 financial year 102<br />

Figure 6.2 Direct funding source for <strong>headspace</strong> occasions of service, 2013/14<br />

financial year 105<br />

Social Policy Research Centre 2015<br />

<strong>headspace</strong> Evaluation Final Report<br />

vi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!