Is headspace making a difference to young people’s lives?
Evaluation-of-headspace-program Evaluation-of-headspace-program
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Figure 4.7 Percentage of headspace clients who considered suicide in the last year, by K10 change and intervention survey wave Note: Data for this analysis is sourced from the headspace intervention survey. Estimates of clinically significant change were tested for the survey data and were shown to align well with hCSA data. Suicide ideation data was specifically collected within the survey data and is not available in the hCSA dataset. Sample sizes can be found in Appendix F. Source: Authors’ calculations from headspace intervention survey data. Figure 4.7 reports the proportion of survey respondents in each K10 change category who had contemplated suicide for both survey waves. The results reveal two highly significant findings. First, the propensity to consider suicide falls by more than half among those whose K10 had improved clinically during their progress through headspace, from 59.2% in the first survey period down to 29.4% at the second. Rates also fell for those who showed either reliable or insignificant improvement, by around 10 percentage points and 18 percentage points respectively. The second significant finding relates to those headspace clients who exhibited no real improvement in K10, i.e. a change of less than two K10 points between survey waves. Even for this group, the propensity to consider suicide fell by more than 16 percentage points, from 64% to 47.8%. These findings indicate that significant change in critical outcomes may occur for headspace clients at high risk of suicide despite there being no evidence of change in psychological distress through the K10 measure. The finding is an important one in that it highlights the potential protective role that the headspace program may have against such extreme adverse mental health outcomes. The change in prevalence of suicidal thoughts for young men and women that had received treatment from headspace are considerable, as shown in Figure 4.8. Males appear more responsive than females in relation to lower rates of suicidal ideation, showing a 41.6 percentage point reduction in suicidal ideation for those who clinically improved in terms of their psychological distress levels. Young women in the same group showed a decrease in suicidal ideation by 27.2 percentage points. For young men who improved reliably, suicidal ideation rates decreased by more than 25 percentage points and for young women, the response is lower at 6.4 percentage points. The rate of reduction is also positive across a number of other groups. Young males and females whose mental health functioning declined reliably and young males whose K10 declined clinically, as measured by changed in K10 scores, experienced increases in suicide ideation. Social Policy Research Centre 2015 headspace Evaluation Final Report 50
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Figure 4.8 Change in prevalence of suicidal thoughts between waves, by gender and K10 change Note: Data for this analysis is sourced from the headspace intervention survey. Estimates of clinically significant change were tested for the survey data and were shown to align well with hCSA data. Suicide ideation data was specifically collected within the survey data and is not available in the hCSA dataset. Sample sizes can be found in Appendix F. Source: Authors’ calculations from headspace intervention survey data. The analysis of reported instances of self-harm shows a similar pattern of reduction. Figure 4.9 shows a decrease in the rates of self-harm across all K10 change groups between Waves 1 and 2, except for those who declined reliably. The greatest reduction in prevalence of self-harm was for those who improved clinically significantly (down 24.7 percentage points) and those who recorded a reliably significant improvement (down 18.3 percentage points). Figure 4.9 Percentage of headspace clients who self-harmed in between waves, by K10 change and intervention survey wave Note: Data for this analysis is sourced from the headspace intervention survey. Estimates of clinically significant change were tested for the survey data and were shown to align well with hCSA data. Information about self-harm was specifically collected within the survey data and is not available in the hCSA dataset. Sample sizes can be found in Appendix F. Source: Authors’ calculations from headspace intervention survey data. Disaggregation of this analysis by gender is shown in Figure 4.10. Young women display a higher prevalence of self-harm than young men, yet those that improve or have no change in psychological distress have broadly the same rate of reduction in self-harm regardless of gender (around 23-24 percentage points). However, for those whose psychological distress increases over the two survey waves, female rates of self-harm remain high whereas rates for males reduce for all categories. Social Policy Research Centre 2015 headspace Evaluation Final Report 51
- Page 9 and 10: Figure 4.9 Figure 4.10 Figure 4.11
- Page 11 and 12: Executive Summary headspace 1 aims
- Page 13 and 14: Executive Summary or very high leve
- Page 15 and 16: Executive Summary through mental he
- Page 17 and 18: value to society of the improvement
- Page 19 and 20: 1. Introduction people in Australia
- Page 21 and 22: 2. Evaluation Methodology 2.1 Aims
- Page 23 and 24: 2. Evaluation Methodology Evaluatio
- Page 25 and 26: 2. Evaluation Methodology Table 2.3
- Page 27 and 28: 2. Evaluation Methodology Represent
- Page 29 and 30: 3. Access and Engagement with Centr
- Page 31 and 32: 3. Access and Engagement with Centr
- Page 33 and 34: 3. Access and Engagement with Centr
- Page 35 and 36: 3. Access and Engagement with Centr
- Page 37 and 38: 3. Access and Engagement with Centr
- Page 39 and 40: 3. Access and Engagement with Centr
- Page 41 and 42: 3. Access and Engagement with Centr
- Page 43 and 44: 3. Access and Engagement with Centr
- Page 45 and 46: 3. Access and Engagement with Centr
- Page 47 and 48: 3. Access and Engagement with Centr
- Page 49 and 50: 3. Access and Engagement with Centr
- Page 51 and 52: 4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Th
- Page 53 and 54: 4. Outcomes of headspace Clients 35
- Page 55 and 56: 4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Ch
- Page 57 and 58: 4. Outcomes of headspace Clients No
- Page 59: 4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Th
- Page 63 and 64: 4. Outcomes of headspace Clients A
- Page 65 and 66: 4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Ta
- Page 67 and 68: 4. Outcomes of headspace Clients nu
- Page 69 and 70: 4. Outcomes of headspace Clients No
- Page 71 and 72: 4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Ta
- Page 73 and 74: y three percentage points, and 2.1
- Page 75 and 76: 4. Outcomes of headspace Clients So
- Page 77 and 78: 4. Outcomes of headspace Clients I
- Page 79 and 80: 4. Outcomes of headspace Clients in
- Page 81 and 82: 4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Wh
- Page 83 and 84: 5. Service Delivery Model For the a
- Page 85 and 86: 5. Service Delivery Model the provi
- Page 87 and 88: 5. Service Delivery Model headspace
- Page 89 and 90: 5. Service Delivery Model services,
- Page 91 and 92: 5. Service Delivery Model services
- Page 93 and 94: 5. Service Delivery Model Further,
- Page 95 and 96: 5. Service Delivery Model that we
- Page 97 and 98: 5. Service Delivery Model is a cons
- Page 99 and 100: 5. Service Delivery Model connectio
- Page 101 and 102: 5. Service Delivery Model Table 5.2
- Page 103 and 104: 5. Service Delivery Model Table 5.3
- Page 105 and 106: 5. Service Delivery Model I don’t
- Page 107 and 108: 5. Service Delivery Model group is
- Page 109 and 110: 5. Service Delivery Model Figure 5.
4. Outcomes of <strong>headspace</strong> Clients<br />
Figure 4.7 Percentage of <strong>headspace</strong> clients who considered suicide in the last year, by K10 change<br />
and intervention survey wave<br />
Note: Data for this analysis is sourced from the <strong>headspace</strong> intervention survey. Estimates of clinically significant change<br />
were tested for the survey data and were shown <strong>to</strong> align well with hCSA data. Suicide ideation data was specifically<br />
collected within the survey data and is not available in the hCSA dataset. Sample sizes can be found in Appendix F.<br />
Source: Authors’ calculations from <strong>headspace</strong> intervention survey data.<br />
Figure 4.7 reports the proportion of survey respondents in each K10 change category who had<br />
contemplated suicide for both survey waves. The results reveal two highly significant findings.<br />
First, the propensity <strong>to</strong> consider suicide falls by more than half among those whose K10 had<br />
improved clinically during their progress through <strong>headspace</strong>, from 59.2% in the first survey period<br />
down <strong>to</strong> 29.4% at the second. Rates also fell for those who showed either reliable or insignificant<br />
improvement, by around 10 percentage points and 18 percentage points respectively.<br />
The second significant finding relates <strong>to</strong> those <strong>headspace</strong> clients who exhibited no real improvement<br />
in K10, i.e. a change of less than two K10 points between survey waves. Even for this group, the<br />
propensity <strong>to</strong> consider suicide fell by more than 16 percentage points, from 64% <strong>to</strong> 47.8%.<br />
These findings indicate that significant change in critical outcomes may occur for <strong>headspace</strong> clients<br />
at high risk of suicide despite there being no evidence of change in psychological distress through<br />
the K10 measure. The finding is an important one in that it highlights the potential protective role that<br />
the <strong>headspace</strong> program may have against such extreme adverse mental health outcomes.<br />
The change in prevalence of suicidal thoughts for <strong>young</strong> men and women that had received<br />
treatment from <strong>headspace</strong> are considerable, as shown in Figure 4.8. Males appear more responsive<br />
than females in relation <strong>to</strong> lower rates of suicidal ideation, showing a 41.6 percentage point reduction<br />
in suicidal ideation for those who clinically improved in terms of their psychological distress levels.<br />
Young women in the same group showed a decrease in suicidal ideation by 27.2 percentage points.<br />
For <strong>young</strong> men who improved reliably, suicidal ideation rates decreased by more than 25 percentage<br />
points and for <strong>young</strong> women, the response is lower at 6.4 percentage points. The rate of reduction<br />
is also positive across a number of other groups. Young males and females whose mental health<br />
functioning declined reliably and <strong>young</strong> males whose K10 declined clinically, as measured by<br />
changed in K10 scores, experienced increases in suicide ideation.<br />
Social Policy Research Centre 2015<br />
<strong>headspace</strong> Evaluation Final Report<br />
50