Is headspace making a difference to young people’s lives?

Recommendations

Info

Appendix E Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree 1 2 3 4 5 D. General satisfaction and feedback Generally satisfied 33.8 54.2 11.0 0.6 0.3 Would suggest to a friend 48.7 41.7 8.3 0.5 0.4 Data Source: Authors calculations from hCSA. headspace clients are invited to fill in a satisfaction survey at their 2nd, 5th, 11th and 16th visits. In total 22,614 headspace clients provided 34,696 responses to questions with most data collected at the 2nd and 5th visits. Cell sizes for specified figures and tables The figures and tables presented in chapters 3 and 4 were based upon analysis of hCSA data as indicated. As a population sample, tests of statistical significance do not apply, however, to assist in the interpretation of results, the evaluators provide below the cell sizes for specified figures and tables. Table E3 Cell Sizes for Figure 3.3 - Average K10 score at presentation by age, sex-and sexuality, headspace clients 2013/14 Age at registration Non-LGBTI Female Non-LGBTI Male LGBTI Female LGBTI Male Total 12 262 254 101 87 704 13 969 671 297 155 2092 14 1747 907 432 158 3244 15 2259 1148 547 172 4126 16 2315 1267 627 186 4395 17 2218 1279 614 205 4316 18 1828 1122 536 191 3677 19 1389 1026 485 222 3122 20 1181 884 405 209 2679 21 1044 819 322 133 2318 22 883 737 287 135 2042 23 732 570 225 109 1636 24 584 476 171 80 1311 25 335 280 110 61 786 Note: Not all young people record their age, gender, sexuality and K10 scores within the hCSA data. Young people aged less than 12 or above 25 have not been included. Social Policy Research Centre 2015 headspace Evaluation Final Report 190
Table E4 Cell Sizes for Figure 3.4 Average SOFAS scores at presentation by age and gender, headspace clients 2013/14 Age at registration Female Male 12 379 370 13 1,316 873 14 2,222 1,104 15 2,908 1,346 16 2,999 1,508 17 2,835 1,510 18 2,340 1,327 19 1,860 1,278 20 1,587 1,129 21 1,362 971 22 1,172 894 23 960 695 24 758 568 25 471 348 Note: Not all young people record their age within the hCSA data. Not all service providers provide a SOFAS score. Young people aged less than 12 or above 25 have not been included. Table E5 Cell sizes for Figure 3.5 Average SOFAS scores at presentation by age and gendersexuality group, headspace clients 2013/14 Age at registration Non-LGBTI Female Non-LGBTI Male LGBTI Female LGBTI Male Total 12 270 271 109 99 749 13 1,011 708 305 165 2,189 14 1,771 942 451 162 3,326 15 2,340 1,163 568 183 4,254 16 2,341 1,315 658 193 4,507 17 2,204 1,296 631 214 4,345 18 1,800 1,131 540 196 3,667 19 1,380 1,046 480 232 3,138 20 1,175 915 412 214 2,716 21 1,047 827 315 144 2,333 22 884 756 288 138 2,066 23 733 585 227 110 1,655 24 577 485 181 83 1,326 25 353 284 118 64 819 Note: Not all young people record their age, gender and sexuality within the hCSA data. Not all service providers provide a SOFAS score. Young people aged less than 12 or above 25 have not been included. Social Policy Research Centre 2015 headspace Evaluation Final Report 191
Page 1 and 2:
Is headspace making a difference to
Page 3 and 4:
Authors This report was written by
Page 5 and 6:
5. Service Delivery Model 73 5.1 Wh
Page 7 and 8:
Table 6.1 Table 6.2 Table 6.3 Main
Page 9 and 10:
Figure 4.9 Figure 4.10 Figure 4.11
Page 11 and 12:
Executive Summary headspace 1 aims
Page 13 and 14:
Executive Summary or very high leve
Page 15 and 16:
Executive Summary through mental he
Page 17 and 18:
value to society of the improvement
Page 19 and 20:
1. Introduction people in Australia
Page 21 and 22:
2. Evaluation Methodology 2.1 Aims
Page 23 and 24:
2. Evaluation Methodology Evaluatio
Page 25 and 26:
2. Evaluation Methodology Table 2.3
Page 27 and 28:
2. Evaluation Methodology Represent
Page 29 and 30:
3. Access and Engagement with Centr
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Th
Page 53 and 54:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients 35
Page 55 and 56:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Ch
Page 57 and 58:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients No
Page 59 and 60:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Th
Page 61 and 62:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Fi
Page 63 and 64:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients A
Page 65 and 66:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Ta
Page 67 and 68:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients nu
Page 69 and 70:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients No
Page 71 and 72:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Ta
Page 73 and 74:
y three percentage points, and 2.1
Page 75 and 76:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients So
Page 77 and 78:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients I
Page 79 and 80:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients in
Page 81 and 82:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Wh
Page 83 and 84:
5. Service Delivery Model For the a
Page 85 and 86:
5. Service Delivery Model the provi
Page 87 and 88:
5. Service Delivery Model headspace
Page 89 and 90:
5. Service Delivery Model services,
Page 91 and 92:
5. Service Delivery Model services
Page 93 and 94:
5. Service Delivery Model Further,
Page 95 and 96:
5. Service Delivery Model that we
Page 97 and 98:
5. Service Delivery Model is a cons
Page 99 and 100:
5. Service Delivery Model connectio
Page 101 and 102:
5. Service Delivery Model Table 5.2
Page 103 and 104:
5. Service Delivery Model Table 5.3
Page 105 and 106:
5. Service Delivery Model I don’t
Page 107 and 108:
5. Service Delivery Model group is
Page 109 and 110:
5. Service Delivery Model Figure 5.
Page 111 and 112:
6. The Costs of headspace One of th
Page 113 and 114:
6. The Costs of headspace Table 6.1
Page 115 and 116:
6. The Costs of headspace In-scope
Page 117 and 118:
6. The Costs of headspace Revenue/
Page 119 and 120:
6. The Costs of headspace Other gov
Page 121 and 122:
7. Conclusion The evaluation of hea
Page 123 and 124:
7. Conclusion treatment); however,
Page 125 and 126:
7. Conclusion Overall the evaluatio
Page 127 and 128:
Appendix A Evaluation scope areas h
Page 129 and 130:
Appendix B The current model of hea
Page 131 and 132:
Appendix B and each SA3 in non-capi
Page 133 and 134:
Appendix B chapter 39 . To determin
Page 135 and 136:
Appendix B While there is an overal
Page 137 and 138:
Appendix B Figure B3 describes the
Page 139 and 140:
Appendix B Figure B5 Cost per young
Page 141 and 142:
Appendix B The concept of access as
Page 143 and 144:
Appendix B Figure B7 Heard of heads
Page 145 and 146:
Figure B10 Proportion of headspace
Page 147 and 148:
Appendix B Table B5 Females 18-25 y
Page 149 and 150: Appendix B following section. Figur
Page 151 and 152: Appendix B and less access to mains
Page 153 and 154: Appendix B Figure B17 Estimated pre
Page 155 and 156: Appendix B Figure B18 SA1s within 1
Page 157 and 158: Figure B20 Hypothetical allocation
Page 159 and 160: Appendix B The current model of cen
Page 161 and 162: Appendix B Current centre funding m
Page 163 and 164: Appendix B Evaluation of the curren
Page 165 and 166: Appendix B Level of funding availab
Page 167 and 168: Appendix B provide a method for ide
Page 169 and 170: Appendix B centres and Localities i
Page 171 and 172: Appendix B for greater flexibility
Page 173 and 174: Appendix B Additional consideration
Page 175 and 176: Appendix B of achieving more effici
Page 177 and 178: Appendix B • Used the simulation
Page 179 and 180: Appendix C information relating to
Page 181 and 182: Appendix C Regarding gender, in bot
Page 183 and 184: Appendix C Figure C5 Total number o
Page 185 and 186: Appendix C Table C1 Information Sum
Page 187 and 188: Appendix C Data Cleaning and Analys
Page 189 and 190: Appendix C groups. The age and sex
Page 191 and 192: Appendix C Figure C8 Demographic ch
Page 193 and 194: Appendix C The KeySurvey software s
Page 195 and 196: Appendix C different client groups.
Page 197 and 198: Appendix D Round State Centre Name
Page 199: Appendix E Characteristics HS clien
Page 203 and 204: Appendix F Figure F1 Changes in K10
Page 205 and 206: Appendix F three SEIFA quintiles. A
Page 207 and 208: Appendix F Occasion of service inte
Page 209 and 210: Appendix F Table F1 Cell sizes for
Page 215 and 216: Appendix G Supplementary material f
Page 217 and 218: Appendix G Table G3 Round 3 (10 cen
Page 219 and 220: Appendix G Table G7 Round 7 (10 cen
Page 221 and 222: State (youth population) a headspac
Page 225 and 226: Appendix G Table G12 Round 11(16 ce
Page 227 and 228: Table G16 Additional youth populati
Page 229 and 230: Round Region State Additional youth
Page 235 and 236: Appendix G Figure G1 Percentage of
Page 243 and 244: Appendix G Table G22 Australians 18
Page 245 and 246: Appendix G Synthetic small area est
Page 247 and 248: Appendix G Figure G16 Estimated pre
Page 249 and 250: Appendix G Figure G18 Estimated pre
Page 251 and 252:
Appendix G Figure G20 Estimated pre
Page 253 and 254:
Appendix G Figure G22 SA1s within 1
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Appendix G Table G25 Centres alloca
Page 261 and 262:
References Atkins, D.C., Bedics, J.
Page 263:
References Smith, E., Jones, T., Wa
show all

Is headspace making a difference to young people’s lives?

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?