Is headspace making a difference to young people’s lives?
Evaluation-of-headspace-program
Evaluation-of-headspace-program
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1. Introduction<br />
people in Australia (<strong>headspace</strong>, 2012).<br />
<strong>headspace</strong> receives funding from the Australian Government Department of Health (DoH), under the<br />
Youth Mental Health Initiative Program, <strong>to</strong> deliver four clinical programs. These comprise:<br />
1. a growing national network of <strong>headspace</strong> centres that operate in metropolitan, regional and<br />
rural locations around Australia (formerly known as Communities of Youth Services)<br />
2. a national online and telephone support service staffed by youth mental health professionals<br />
(e<strong>headspace</strong>)<br />
3. <strong>headspace</strong> School Support, which provides assistance <strong>to</strong> secondary school communities<br />
impacted by the suicide of a student<br />
4. <strong>headspace</strong> Youth Early Psychosis Program (hYEPP): a specialist support service delivered<br />
through <strong>headspace</strong> centres <strong>to</strong> <strong>young</strong> people experiencing, or at risk of developing, their first<br />
episode of psychosis.<br />
This evaluation focuses on only the first program: the effectiveness of the <strong>headspace</strong> centres.<br />
However, it should be noted that <strong>headspace</strong> administers and coordinates a number of programs and<br />
complementary activities that may have influenced some of the evaluation findings (e.g. community<br />
awareness campaigns that seek <strong>to</strong> encourage early help-seeking and improve the outcomes of<br />
<strong>young</strong> people with mental health concerns).<br />
<strong>headspace</strong> centres are a network of enhanced primary care services where <strong>young</strong> people (12-25<br />
years) with mild <strong>to</strong> moderate mental health problems are able <strong>to</strong> access a broad range of in-house<br />
services or be connected <strong>to</strong> complementary services within the community. This age range is<br />
targeted because the onset of mental illness is most likely <strong>to</strong> occur in adolescence and early<br />
adulthood (de Girolamo et al, 2012). It is a time when <strong>young</strong> people need continuity in support and<br />
services, rather than the interruption manifested in the traditional service delivery division between<br />
adolescent and adult mental health care (Rickwood et al., 2014).<br />
Unlike traditional mental health service options, <strong>headspace</strong> centres also provide integrated care<br />
across four key domains: mental health, physical health, drug and alcohol use, and social and<br />
vocational participation. The holistic care of <strong>young</strong> people is facilitated by the centre model that<br />
draws on the expertise of a lead agency and a number of local partner organisations, each with<br />
expertise in different areas (such as primary health care, mental health care and vocational training).<br />
In recognition of the increased need for mental health services for <strong>young</strong> people in Australia, the<br />
program continues <strong>to</strong> expand and has bi-partisan Federal Government support. <strong>headspace</strong> centres<br />
have been opened in progressive rounds since 2006. Approximately 80 centres are currently fully<br />
operational nationally; however, more are due <strong>to</strong> open each year until 2016. Most recently, the federal<br />
government announced additional funding <strong>to</strong> expand the centre <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>to</strong> 100 by the end of 2016.<br />
1.2 Evaluation background<br />
<strong>headspace</strong> was first evaluated by researchers at the Social Policy Research Centre in 2008/2009 12 .<br />
This independent evaluation adopted a longitudinal, mixed methods approach <strong>to</strong> examine the<br />
achievements, limitations and future directions of the program, with a focus on the original 30<br />
<strong>headspace</strong> centres (formerly known as Communities of Youth Services). The evaluation found<br />
that <strong>headspace</strong> had made significant progress <strong>to</strong>wards improving availability, appropriateness and<br />
accessibility of mental health support for <strong>young</strong> people (Muir et al, 2009).<br />
Limited outcomes data were available at the time of the first evaluation; however, the analysis<br />
conducted suggested that <strong>headspace</strong> promoted and facilitated improvements in <strong>young</strong> <strong>people’s</strong><br />
mental health, social wellbeing and participation in education, training and employment (Muir et al,<br />
2009).<br />
12<br />
The evaluations have had continuity in leadership, with Ilan Katz and Kristy Muir leading both evaluations. This<br />
has ensured that the second evaluation has built on the processes, methods and knowledge gained through the first<br />
evaluation.<br />
Social Policy Research Centre 2015<br />
<strong>headspace</strong> Evaluation Final Report<br />
9