Is headspace making a difference to young people’s lives?

Evaluation-of-headspace-program Evaluation-of-headspace-program

05.12.2016 Views

Appendix C same time at baseline, and that the follow up would be approximately 9 months later for all three surveys. However, this was not possible to achieve. The difference in timing of the surveys has been taken into account in the outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis as outlined below. Survey of headspace clients The aim of the longitudinal survey of headspace clients (the intervention group) is to collect information about young people who have accessed headspace services and how these services may have impacted upon their mental health and other relevant outcomes. An initial sample of 1,500 headspace clients was targeted. The survey collection has achieved a first wave sample of 1,582 young people. Two separate data collection processes were initiated for the Wave 1 data collection. The first data collection conducted by Colmar-Brunton resulted in insufficient response rates for the sample. Following joint efforts by headspace and SPRC to promote survey participation, SPRC launched another data collection round, which resulted in a sufficient Wave 1 sample being collected. The evaluators conducted analysis on the headspace clients who participated in the survey to determine their representativeness in comparison to the broader headspace client population. This analysis is presented below. Representativeness of headspace intervention group The objective of this analysis is to assess the representativeness of the headspace survey intervention group over the population of all headspace clients observed within the 2013/14 hCSA dataset. The representativeness of the survey group is important so that the results can be generalised to the overall population. headspace survey participants were matched to the hCSA data and a number of characteristics were assessed and compared. These included demographic and geographical variables, service use and mental health issues and treatment. As the headspace survey intervention group was separated into two data collection cohorts, both groups have been assessed separately and are labelled - intervention group 1 and 2 respectively. Demographic variables We find that individuals are relatively uniformly represented across different ages in the intervention group and the entire population, however the intervention group is more likely to be older than young people in the hCSA data Figure C1). Figure C1 Age distribution – hCSA and intervention survey group Source: Authors calculations from headspace intervention survey data and hCSA data. Social Policy Research Centre 2015 headspace Evaluation Final Report 170

Appendix C Regarding gender, in both groups males are relatively under-represented (with a magnitude of around 10 percentage points) relative to females in the intervention group compared to the entire population. Figure C2 Sex distribution – hCSA and intervention survey group Source: Authors calculations from headspace intervention survey data and hCSA data. Conversely, native-born Australians, those from native-English speaking as well as from non- Indigenous background are relatively over-represented in the headspace survey intervention group compared to the entire population (results not shown). The distribution of individuals across states is relatively uniform in the intervention group and the entire population as is, to an extent, the degree of disadvantage of the localities where the individuals come from, as captured by SEIFA scores. However, those in the intervention group have a higher representation in major city residential origin group, and a lower representation in outer regional group, compared to the entire population. Mental health measures Mental health and behaviour are recorded as the primary presenting issue at first visit for the majority of clients in headspace intervention groups and in the population as a whole (Figure C3). Just over 80% of those in both intervention groups and around 72% in the entire population present with mental health and behaviour issues at their first visit. Figure C3 Primary issues at first visit Source: Authors calculations from headspace intervention survey data and hCSA data. Social Policy Research Centre 2015 headspace Evaluation Final Report 171

Appendix C<br />

Regarding gender, in both groups males are relatively under-represented (with a magnitude of around<br />

10 percentage points) relative <strong>to</strong> females in the intervention group compared <strong>to</strong> the entire population.<br />

Figure C2 Sex distribution – hCSA and intervention survey group<br />

Source: Authors calculations from <strong>headspace</strong> intervention survey data and hCSA data.<br />

Conversely, native-born Australians, those from native-English speaking as well as from non-<br />

Indigenous background are relatively over-represented in the <strong>headspace</strong> survey intervention group<br />

compared <strong>to</strong> the entire population (results not shown). The distribution of individuals across states<br />

is relatively uniform in the intervention group and the entire population as is, <strong>to</strong> an extent, the degree<br />

of disadvantage of the localities where the individuals come from, as captured by SEIFA scores.<br />

However, those in the intervention group have a higher representation in major city residential origin<br />

group, and a lower representation in outer regional group, compared <strong>to</strong> the entire population.<br />

Mental health measures<br />

Mental health and behaviour are recorded as the primary presenting issue at first visit for the majority<br />

of clients in <strong>headspace</strong> intervention groups and in the population as a whole (Figure C3). Just over<br />

80% of those in both intervention groups and around 72% in the entire population present with<br />

mental health and behaviour issues at their first visit.<br />

Figure C3 Primary issues at first visit<br />

Source: Authors calculations from <strong>headspace</strong> intervention survey data and hCSA data.<br />

Social Policy Research Centre 2015<br />

<strong>headspace</strong> Evaluation Final Report<br />

171

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!