Is headspace making a difference to young people’s lives?
Evaluation-of-headspace-program
Evaluation-of-headspace-program
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Appendix B<br />
and each SA3 in non-capital cities across Australia 38 .<br />
Scope – <strong>headspace</strong> services<br />
In addition <strong>to</strong> the main centres, and in an attempt <strong>to</strong> maximise access <strong>to</strong> <strong>headspace</strong>, a number of<br />
additional outreach-type services are provided:<br />
• Outreach sites are defined as those working outside of the <strong>headspace</strong> site premises<br />
in a one-<strong>to</strong>-one capacity in order <strong>to</strong> engage a <strong>young</strong> person. This model is used on an<br />
as-needed basis. In-reach or visiting services are defined as <strong>headspace</strong> services which are<br />
established at another service or school <strong>to</strong> provide primary assessment and consultation.<br />
Staff are provided from the main site and the hours of service <strong>to</strong> the site are regular.<br />
• Satellite sites are centres which are established when a fully operational main site reaches<br />
a critical mass. Satellite sites require ongoing infrastructure, operational support, staffing,<br />
supervision and clinical governance from a main site. Satellite sites do not receive<br />
independent funding from the <strong>headspace</strong> national office. Satellite sites may not include all<br />
components of the <strong>headspace</strong> platform and may not be open full-time.<br />
As these outreach-type services offer varying levels of support and access periods, and the<br />
geographic areas in which they are established remain in-scope for a new and independent<br />
<strong>headspace</strong> centre, these outreach-type centres were not included in the centre expansion analysis.<br />
However, there were two exceptions <strong>to</strong> this: a funded outpost of <strong>headspace</strong> Launces<strong>to</strong>n in Devonport<br />
which attracts additional funding and fits the profile of a full centre, and a satellite site in Wyong<br />
which offers the core services and relies on like-services within the area for operational costs. These<br />
two centres, which are considered satellite sites but meet the profiles for funding of full centres, were<br />
included in the centre expansion analysis on the advice of <strong>headspace</strong> and DoH.<br />
Current Centre allocations (Rounds 1 – 8)<br />
In order <strong>to</strong> accurately describe the costs and effects of expanding <strong>headspace</strong> beyond 100 centres<br />
using the current expansion model, it is important <strong>to</strong> take in<strong>to</strong> account the his<strong>to</strong>ry of the expansion of<br />
<strong>headspace</strong> centres from inception of the program at Round 1 in 2006 through <strong>to</strong> the most recently<br />
announced Round 8 list of centre locations.<br />
Table B1 <strong>headspace</strong> centres Rounds 1-8<br />
Round Year of Establishment Number of Centres<br />
1 2007 10<br />
2 2009 20<br />
3 2012 10<br />
4 2013 16<br />
5 2014 15<br />
6 <strong>to</strong> be established in 2015 16<br />
7 <strong>to</strong> be established by Dec 2015 10<br />
8 <strong>to</strong> be established by Dec 2016 5<br />
Following the completion of Round 8 there will be 102 fully operational centres. As noted above,<br />
Devonport (Round 4) is designated an ‘outpost’ as it receives additional funding, and Wyong (Round<br />
6) is a ‘satellite’ and does not receive separate funding. The inclusion of these centres explains the<br />
inconsistency in terminology in the question regarding expansion of <strong>headspace</strong> beyond 100 centres,<br />
when in fact there are 102 centres.<br />
For each Round of centre expansion from 1 – 8 we describe:<br />
• the increase in coverage of the target population<br />
• the increase in centre level and hNO costs, and<br />
• the proportion of the target population left unserved by a <strong>headspace</strong> centre based on the<br />
38<br />
Lord Howe <strong>Is</strong>land and Illawarra Catchment Reserve, which contain youth populations of 30 and 3 respectively, were<br />
excluded from the centre expansion analysis.<br />
Social Policy Research Centre 2015<br />
<strong>headspace</strong> Evaluation Final Report<br />
121