Is headspace making a difference to young people’s lives?
Evaluation-of-headspace-program
Evaluation-of-headspace-program
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6. The Costs of <strong>headspace</strong><br />
Revenue/<br />
Expenditure<br />
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Total (Rounds 1-4)<br />
No. of Occasions of<br />
service<br />
Average cost per<br />
OoS<br />
44,669 68,067 36,846 41,189 190,771<br />
$210 $264 $250 $314 $260<br />
Note: Round 5 centres have not been included in this analysis.<br />
Data Source: Authors’ calculations from hCSA and hCFA<br />
In assessing the allocation of <strong>headspace</strong> grant funding <strong>to</strong> individual centres within the 2013/14<br />
financial year and the value of <strong>to</strong>tal expenditure as a function of the number of occasion of service,<br />
we observed a large degree of heterogeneity at the centre level (results not shown). This variation<br />
can be caused by a number of fac<strong>to</strong>rs including:<br />
• operational phase relative <strong>to</strong> start-up time<br />
• an undercount of occasions of services in the <strong>headspace</strong> centre services allocation data<br />
collection 35<br />
• reporting errors in either datasets<br />
• variation in centre location and lead agency partnership.<br />
Taking only those centres that could be considered fully operational within the 2013/14 financial year<br />
(primarily Rounds 1-4 centres), there remain a number of centres that have very high <strong>headspace</strong><br />
grant investment with relatively low occasions of service. These centres require further investigation<br />
as <strong>to</strong> the underlying causes and operational efficiencies that could be achieved as well as the<br />
necessity of the overall grant revenue in receipt.<br />
Turning <strong>to</strong> the variation among centre rounds, we can observe that centres operating in rounds 1-4<br />
record an average cost per occasion of service of $210 - $314. Round 1 centres have the lowest<br />
average cost per occasion of service and Round 4 the highest, which is also likely <strong>to</strong> be a product of<br />
the relative newness of these centres in 2013/14.<br />
Our estimate for government investment via the <strong>headspace</strong> grant within the 2013/14 financial year is<br />
$260 per occasion of service. This estimate takes in<strong>to</strong> account that the expenditure component only<br />
and includes Rounds 1-4 centres.<br />
<strong>headspace</strong> national office<br />
<strong>headspace</strong> centres also receive ongoing support from <strong>headspace</strong> National Office (hNO). This<br />
involves a range of services and support including human resources, compliance training and<br />
assistance, information technology, specialised training, clinical support, contract management<br />
and community engagement and awareness. The Department of Health has allocated $96,000 per<br />
centre annually for hNO <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> deliver these services. The actual expenditure from this grant<br />
component varies, and it is not possible <strong>to</strong> extract a precise value from the current financial data due<br />
<strong>to</strong> the inter-relationship with other <strong>headspace</strong> services. The grant allocation of $96,000 per year is<br />
taken <strong>to</strong> be an estimate of the actual expenditure <strong>to</strong>wards support from hNO for each centre. This<br />
equates <strong>to</strong> a value of $6,336,000 for those centres that are in-scope, within the 2013/14 financial<br />
year (Rounds 1-4).<br />
Medicare Benefits Scheme (MBS)<br />
More than 45% of services received at <strong>headspace</strong> centres attract a Medicare subsidy. This pattern<br />
reflects the <strong>headspace</strong> model and funding arrangements, which were designed <strong>to</strong> leverage from<br />
the MBS. Given the substantial MBS benefit that is realised through <strong>headspace</strong> centres, we<br />
have considered that government investment via the MBS is in-scope for analysis of the overall<br />
government investment <strong>to</strong> provide services <strong>to</strong> <strong>young</strong> people at <strong>headspace</strong> centres across Australia.<br />
It is recognised that a number of services that are related <strong>to</strong> <strong>headspace</strong> and also attract the MBS<br />
35<br />
This has been an issue in Broome for example, but has recently been addressed.<br />
Social Policy Research Centre 2015<br />
<strong>headspace</strong> Evaluation Final Report<br />
107