05.12.2016 Views

Is headspace making a difference to young people’s lives?

Evaluation-of-headspace-program

Evaluation-of-headspace-program

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6. The Costs of <strong>headspace</strong><br />

Revenue/<br />

Expenditure<br />

Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Total (Rounds 1-4)<br />

No. of Occasions of<br />

service<br />

Average cost per<br />

OoS<br />

44,669 68,067 36,846 41,189 190,771<br />

$210 $264 $250 $314 $260<br />

Note: Round 5 centres have not been included in this analysis.<br />

Data Source: Authors’ calculations from hCSA and hCFA<br />

In assessing the allocation of <strong>headspace</strong> grant funding <strong>to</strong> individual centres within the 2013/14<br />

financial year and the value of <strong>to</strong>tal expenditure as a function of the number of occasion of service,<br />

we observed a large degree of heterogeneity at the centre level (results not shown). This variation<br />

can be caused by a number of fac<strong>to</strong>rs including:<br />

• operational phase relative <strong>to</strong> start-up time<br />

• an undercount of occasions of services in the <strong>headspace</strong> centre services allocation data<br />

collection 35<br />

• reporting errors in either datasets<br />

• variation in centre location and lead agency partnership.<br />

Taking only those centres that could be considered fully operational within the 2013/14 financial year<br />

(primarily Rounds 1-4 centres), there remain a number of centres that have very high <strong>headspace</strong><br />

grant investment with relatively low occasions of service. These centres require further investigation<br />

as <strong>to</strong> the underlying causes and operational efficiencies that could be achieved as well as the<br />

necessity of the overall grant revenue in receipt.<br />

Turning <strong>to</strong> the variation among centre rounds, we can observe that centres operating in rounds 1-4<br />

record an average cost per occasion of service of $210 - $314. Round 1 centres have the lowest<br />

average cost per occasion of service and Round 4 the highest, which is also likely <strong>to</strong> be a product of<br />

the relative newness of these centres in 2013/14.<br />

Our estimate for government investment via the <strong>headspace</strong> grant within the 2013/14 financial year is<br />

$260 per occasion of service. This estimate takes in<strong>to</strong> account that the expenditure component only<br />

and includes Rounds 1-4 centres.<br />

<strong>headspace</strong> national office<br />

<strong>headspace</strong> centres also receive ongoing support from <strong>headspace</strong> National Office (hNO). This<br />

involves a range of services and support including human resources, compliance training and<br />

assistance, information technology, specialised training, clinical support, contract management<br />

and community engagement and awareness. The Department of Health has allocated $96,000 per<br />

centre annually for hNO <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> deliver these services. The actual expenditure from this grant<br />

component varies, and it is not possible <strong>to</strong> extract a precise value from the current financial data due<br />

<strong>to</strong> the inter-relationship with other <strong>headspace</strong> services. The grant allocation of $96,000 per year is<br />

taken <strong>to</strong> be an estimate of the actual expenditure <strong>to</strong>wards support from hNO for each centre. This<br />

equates <strong>to</strong> a value of $6,336,000 for those centres that are in-scope, within the 2013/14 financial<br />

year (Rounds 1-4).<br />

Medicare Benefits Scheme (MBS)<br />

More than 45% of services received at <strong>headspace</strong> centres attract a Medicare subsidy. This pattern<br />

reflects the <strong>headspace</strong> model and funding arrangements, which were designed <strong>to</strong> leverage from<br />

the MBS. Given the substantial MBS benefit that is realised through <strong>headspace</strong> centres, we<br />

have considered that government investment via the MBS is in-scope for analysis of the overall<br />

government investment <strong>to</strong> provide services <strong>to</strong> <strong>young</strong> people at <strong>headspace</strong> centres across Australia.<br />

It is recognised that a number of services that are related <strong>to</strong> <strong>headspace</strong> and also attract the MBS<br />

35<br />

This has been an issue in Broome for example, but has recently been addressed.<br />

Social Policy Research Centre 2015<br />

<strong>headspace</strong> Evaluation Final Report<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!