01.12.2016 Views

5128_ch04ansTE_pp652-661

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

660 Additional Answers<br />

10. (a) [3, 3]<br />

(e) Local maximum at (0.889, 1.011);<br />

(b) (,3] and [3, )<br />

local minimum at (0, 0)<br />

(c) Approximately (2.584, 0.706) and (3.290, )<br />

(f) <br />

(d) Approximately (, 2.584) and (0.706, 3.290)<br />

2 9 , 0.667 <br />

(e) Local maximum at<br />

16. (a) Approximately (, 0.215]<br />

3, (b) Approximately [0.215, 2) and (2, )<br />

3 1<br />

(1.732, 0.183);<br />

(c) Approximately (2, 3.710)<br />

4<br />

(d) (, 2) and approximately (3.710, )<br />

local minimum at<br />

(e) Local maximum at (0.215, 2.417)<br />

3,<br />

(f) (3.710, 3.420)<br />

(1.732, 0.683)<br />

4<br />

35. .<br />

y<br />

(f) (2.584, 0.573), (0.706, 0.338), and (3.290, 0.161)<br />

2<br />

11. (a) (0, 2] (b) [2, 0)<br />

(c) None (d) (2, 0) and (0, 2)<br />

(e) Local maxima at (2, ln 2) and (2, ln 2)<br />

x<br />

(f) None<br />

–3<br />

3<br />

12. (a) Approximately [0, 0.176], 0.994, p 2 ,<br />

y = f(x)<br />

[2.148, 2.965], <br />

3.834, 3 p <br />

2 , and 5.591, 2p <br />

(b) Approximately [0.176, 0.994], p 2 , 2.148 ,<br />

p<br />

[2.965, 3.834], and 3 , 5.591<br />

2 <br />

(c) Approximately (0.542, 1.266), (1.876, 2.600),<br />

(3.425, 4.281), and (5.144, 6.000)<br />

(d) Approximately (0, 0.542), (1.266, 1.876),<br />

(2.600, 3.425), (4.281, 5.144),<br />

and (6.000, 2p)<br />

(e) Local maxima at (0.176, 1.266), p 2 ,0 <br />

p<br />

and (2.965, 1.266), 3 ,2<br />

2 <br />

, and (2p, 1);<br />

local minima at (0, 1),<br />

(0.994, 0.513),<br />

(2.148, 0.513), (3.834, 1.806),<br />

and (5.591, 1.806)<br />

Note that the local extrema at x 3.834,<br />

x 3 p , and x 5.591 are also absolute extrema.<br />

2<br />

(f) (0.542, 0.437), (1.266, 0.267),<br />

(1.876, 0.267), (2.600, 0.437), (3.425, 0.329), (4.281, 0.120),<br />

(5.144, 0.120), and (6.000, 0.329)<br />

2<br />

13. (a) 0, <br />

(b) (, 0] and <br />

2<br />

3<br />

, <br />

(c) (, 0) (d) (0, )<br />

(e) Local maximum at<br />

2 16<br />

(1.155, 3.079)<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3 1<br />

<br />

, 33 <br />

(f ) None<br />

14. (a) Approximately [0.578, 1.692]<br />

(b) Approximately (, 0.578] and [1.692, )<br />

(c) Approximately (, 1.079)<br />

(d) Approximately (1.079, )<br />

(e) Local maximum at (1.692, 20.517);<br />

local minimum at (0.578, 0.972)<br />

(f) (1.079, 13.601)<br />

15. (a) 0, 8 9 <br />

(b) (, 0] and <br />

8 , )<br />

9<br />

(c) <br />

, 2 9 <br />

(d) 2 9 ,0 <br />

and (0, )<br />

–3<br />

36. (a) Absolute minimum is 2 at x 1;<br />

absolute maximum is 3 at x 3<br />

(b) None<br />

(c)<br />

1633001.59<br />

41. (a) With some rounding, y <br />

1 17.471e 0.06378t<br />

(b) The regression fit looks very good:<br />

[0, 80] by [0, 1600000]<br />

(c) 1,476,128 829,210 2,305,337<br />

(d) About 1885; the graph has an inflection at this point.<br />

(e) The maximum population will be about 2,462,000.<br />

(f) There are many possible causes. Advances in transportation began<br />

drawing the population southward after 1920, and Tennessee was wellsituated<br />

geographically to become a crossroads of river, railroad, and<br />

automobile routes. By the year 2000 there had been numerous other<br />

demographic changes. It should also be pointed out that the census<br />

years in the data (1850 – 1910) include the years of the Civil War and<br />

Reconstruction, so the regression is based on unusual data to begin with.<br />

51. (a) V(x) x(15 – 2x)(5 – x)<br />

(b) 0 x 5<br />

[0, 5] by [10, 70]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!