Pro-Se_SCOTUS_Extension-Time-Petition_11-21-16

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST FOR A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI No. _______ In The Supreme Court of The United States Carlos Ramirez, Petitioner, v. Bausch and Lomb Inc., Respondent. APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT To the Honorable Chief Justice of the United States: Pursuant to Title 28, United State Code, Section 2101(c) and rules 13.5 and 30.2 of the Supreme Court of the United States, application is made for an extension of time within which to file a petition for a writ of certiorari in this matter be extended for sixty (60) days, to and including, February 3, 2017. The order sought to be reviewed is that of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in the case entitled Carlos Ramirez versus Bausch & Lomb, Inc.,($VRX) The Order sought to be reviewed was entered on September 7, 2016 at which it states; to not accept any further filling by either party hence, the absence of a petition for either rehearing or rehearing en banc. The time allowed by law for filing a petition for a writ of certiorari will expire on, December 5, 2016. This Application-request is being filed at least ten days before that date. The Jurisdiction of the Court would be invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1254.
The order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is appended and was not reported. This case presents issues of significant importance to a large sector of consumers in the United States. The statutes that the jurisdiction of this court is invoked under correspond to the Private Sector Whistleblower Laws and Act, as well as applicable statute to the Respondent that are relevant to the Pharmaceutical business such as, The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices and, CFRs (Code of Federal Regulations) 21 C.F.R., Parts 210, 211, 820. Pro Se Petitioner’s request for an extension of time is necessary due to the following facts; Petitioner has, diligently, since the final Order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit seek for a Pro Bono counselor that can help since he cannot afford to pay thousands of dollars to retain one. Furthermore, Petitioner has emailed potential counselors admitted to the Supreme Court, Law Schools, Bar Associations and has gone to legal aid clinics without success. Petitioner Ramirez has determined that this is a case important for the consumer public safety and interest as well as, personally and professionally that, it warrants a petition for certiorari. I am a Pro Se Petitioner who needs the additional time since; I am not school in the law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner Carlos Ramirez relies upon The Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States, Rule 13(3) states:
Page 1: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED
Page 5: No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNI

Pro-Se_SCOTUS_Extension-Time-Petition_11-21-16

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?