Civic Activism as a Novel Component of Armenian Civil Society
English-3
English-3
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.1.2. Stop Changes in Maternity Leave Law<br />
• Background: What is the issue?<br />
This initiative is an interesting c<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> re-starting activism after a period <strong>of</strong> inaction. The<br />
initiative first came into being in 2011 <strong>as</strong> a response to a change in the legislation on temporary<br />
unemployment benefits enacted on December 1, 2010. The change affected pregnant working<br />
women, who would see their benefits cut. The initiative organised a number <strong>of</strong> activities,<br />
including protests, press conferences, and sending letters to legislative representatives and<br />
executive <strong>of</strong>ficials. In February 2011, under pressure from the activists, the media and the<br />
broader public, the government reversed its decision and restored the original provision <strong>of</strong> 100%<br />
paid maternity leave. The initiative h<strong>as</strong> achieved its objectives; in the retrospect, we can say that<br />
it went into a dormant stage.<br />
The impetus for the re-birth <strong>of</strong> activism w<strong>as</strong> set when, in early October 2014, the<br />
government again proposed changes to the maternity leave law. Women who do not work would<br />
receive more money, while women who work would no longer receive compensation equal to<br />
their salaries when they are on maternity leave; instead, the sum would be dependent on the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> years they had worked. The “Stop Changes in Maternity Leave Law” initiative w<strong>as</strong><br />
re-launched <strong>as</strong> a reaction.<br />
• Chronology and the main developments<br />
On 23 October 2014, not only working mothers but also their children protested in front <strong>of</strong> the<br />
RA government building. Approximately 150 people participated in the demonstration. The<br />
protesters stated that if the Law on Luxury Tax w<strong>as</strong> enforced, then not-working mothers could be<br />
financed from those taxes, not from funds that would otherwise go to working women.<br />
On 29 October 2014, the activists <strong>of</strong> the initiative said that they were planning to address<br />
a letter to the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Labour and Social Affairs. During a press conference organised by the<br />
Women’s Rights Centre (same day), the representatives <strong>of</strong> the centre said that if compensation<br />
during the maternity leave were to depend on the number <strong>of</strong> years worked, then women would<br />
postpone pregnancy until their work histories were long enough to entitle them to proper<br />
compensation.<br />
During the 18 November 2014, session <strong>of</strong> the National Assembly, the latter stated that it<br />
would do everything possible to both incre<strong>as</strong>e the compensation <strong>of</strong> non-working mothers and<br />
give 100% salary compensation to high-income working women. Thus, the initiative can be<br />
characterised <strong>as</strong> a success, at le<strong>as</strong>t for the time being.<br />
• Current status <strong>of</strong> the initiative<br />
The government decision w<strong>as</strong> reversed; hence, there is no need for active engagement at the<br />
moment. However, the initiative cannot be considered fully dissolved. There seems to be some<br />
organisational inertia present, and people involved remain active to some extent, particularly on<br />
social media. The current state <strong>of</strong> the initiative can be described <strong>as</strong> one <strong>of</strong> slow progress; it is not<br />
yet fully resolved or closed. As one <strong>of</strong> the leaders mentioned in one <strong>of</strong> the interviews, it h<strong>as</strong> been<br />
39