14.11.2016 Views

3FOOD

TIR-CG_Luxembourg-Final-Report_Long-Version

TIR-CG_Luxembourg-Final-Report_Long-Version

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Third Industrial Revolution Consulting Group<br />

- Provide commodities that allow users to make the most out of travel time: Wi-Fi internet<br />

connection in transport hubs, outlets to recharge mobile phones, availability of seating<br />

and of small tables, conveniance stores at major stations, etc. There is no reason why a<br />

bus or a tram should offer a worse quality of service than an airplane or a train.<br />

2.2.3 Push Administrative policies.<br />

This policy refers to a set of measures that coercively limits totally or partially non-sustainable<br />

transport means. Recommended measures in this line are:<br />

- Banning polluting vehicles from entering certain parts of the city by designating marked<br />

off Limited Traffic Zones or Pedestrian Zones. This can be done permanently or at certain<br />

times; the ban can be imposed on all vehicles or on some categories, like ICE vehicles or<br />

pending emission level.<br />

- Regulate parking by eliminating parking spaces along roads, provided that the liberated<br />

space will not be used to increase the car lanes but, rather, be reserved for bike lanes as<br />

well as bus lanes and space for pedestrians.<br />

2.2.4 Push Supply policies.<br />

Supply policies refer to interventions on the supply side, either vehicles or infrastructures.<br />

Among the supply policies that can be used as “push” measures, we recommend:<br />

- Reducing the capacity of the streets – especially in urban contexts –, eliminating parking<br />

space along the road, and using some of the car lanes to build reserved bike lanes and/or<br />

reserved bus lanes. This is a key/strategic action to achieve the established goals.<br />

- Re-distributing public space in a more “democratic” way. A person in a car occupies as<br />

much as 15 times the space of a person doing the same trip on public transport, and 35<br />

times the space of a pedestrian. Space use in cities tends to reflect this inequality: more is<br />

allocated to cars, taking it away from other uses. Reserving lanes for public transport or<br />

walking can effectively increase the capacity of a street to carry people. It is of great<br />

importance that the available public space be redistributed equitably between public<br />

transport and active mobility to ensure the quality of service needed to convince people<br />

to change their habits.<br />

It is important to note that limitations and prohibitions can be unpopular if not well-supported<br />

and justified. In particular, they have to be combined with new modes of mobility that are more<br />

attractive to users and more efficient to use. Social persuasion can help reach the objectives of<br />

a less wasteful system of mobility.<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!