3FOOD
TIR-CG_Luxembourg-Final-Report_Long-Version TIR-CG_Luxembourg-Final-Report_Long-Version
Third Industrial Revolution Consulting Group Diesel fuel excise fees are so low that they promote “fuel tourism” with non-residents fueling up in Luxembourg to take advantage of the low fuel prices. While this policy reaps the government tax revenues from non-residents (€745 million in 2015) it is having pernicious, unwanted side effects. Traffic congestion, noise, and exhaust pollution from the diesel fumes are a daily nuisance. Luxembourg incurs an annual energy trade balance deficit because of its need to import over 95% of petroleum and natural gas products. The steep rise in transportation CO 2 emissions is proving difficult to curtail. And Luxembourg has among the highest motorization rates in the EU, and well as among the EU’s highest amount of time spent driving. Another confounding policy is Luxembourg’s vehicle registration fee, which is the same (€50) regardless of whether the vehicle is fuel sipping or diesel guzzling. Most European countries have implemented variable vehicle registration taxes/fees, based on fuel efficiency/inefficiency, fuel type, and level of CO 2 emissions. For example, the Netherlands (as well as Spain and Ireland) reduces registration fees for the most fuel-efficient cars. To register a Ford Fiesta costs €7,080, whereas a comparable priced Fiat 500 only incurs a €2,386 registration fee because it releases much lower CO 2 emissions. This similar policy practice in Ireland led to 90% of vehicle sales in lower-emission vehicle classes. Luxembourg’s one fee fits all sizes, on the other hand, has no influence on the buyer’s vehicle selection. Moreover, the Luxembourg tax regime in regards to company cars results in including a vehicle as in-kind benefits to employees’ remuneration offers. A key part of the 2016 Study on Assessing the Environmental Fiscal Reform Potential for the EU28, issued by the DG Environment of the European Commission, are recommendations reflecting the full costs of fossil fuels. The recommendations, summarized in Tables 25-4, 25-6 and 25-9, offer guidance for Luxembourg lawmakers and stakeholders. Waste Streams If there is an eye-opening reality to the loss of wealth in the linear economy, it is captured in the fact that 50 to 75 percent of all natural resources consumption becomes pollution and waste within 12 months. 305 Closing the loop, turning wastes into nutrients, reducing the need for virgin resources, and innovating through pursuit of biomimicry processes, are essential for expanding prosperity and wellbeing while collapsing waste and pollution. 305 Matthews, Emily et al (2000) The Weight of Nations, http://www.wri.org/ 358
Third Industrial Revolution Consulting Group Plastics 50% of plastics are disposed immediately after a single-use application, notably packaging, agricultural sheets and many consumer items. Plastics have grown 8.7% year after year since 1950, now amounting to nearly 300 million tons per year. The cost to the planet’s degraded natural capital alone exceeds $75 billion per year. Following the current trend, petrochemicalbased plastics are projected to account for 15 percent of the global carbon budget by 2050. 306 CHALLENGE Access to feedstock Quality of end s product (real)* Financial issues Market demand PLASTIC Recycled s plastic Biopolymers Biopolymers Recycled Biopolymers and recycled Recycled Biopolymers and recycled Source: Trucost (2015) 307 RELEVANT STAKEHOLDER Recyclers/ manufacturers Plastic manufacturers Plastic manufacturers Recyclers/ manufacturers Recyclers/ manufacturers CAUSE SOLUTION STAKEHOLDERS Low perceived value of plastic Low collectio of pl as tic at end-of-use Large scale plant matter from responsible sources Some s bioplastic ar e reported to be inferior in some qualitie Low quality feedstock can jeopardize quality in end product Cheap oil commodity prices Low volumes of processed material Distrust of benefitcl ai ms End customer not aware Quality of end product (perceived) Higher costs of plastic Consider ‘true pricing’ – imonetizng e xternalitie s of pl as ticpr oductio n , consumptio n and ndi spos al Producer responsibility n legislatio Improved access s nto recycling facilitie/ cur b side collectio Direct takeback of product –taking ownership of recovery Incorporate industrial waste product – such as lignin, a waste from pulp and paper sector. All Policy makers Policy makers Retailers/ product manufacturers Investors Academics/Researchers Contin un ed inno vatio and de velopment Investors Academics/Researchers Improve design for recycling/reuse Raise awareness of other finnci al bene fit – s tability of feedstock, brand value, n protectio ag ainst future legislatio n Develop infrastructure to achieve economies of scale at each step of value chain Avoid greenwashing by ensuring benefitof pr oduct i is scientif c ally and robustly calculated. Use a holisticassessme n t that considers potentia l trade-offs. Educate end consumers of the benefitof sus tainable s plastic t o help drive demand Improved marketin g and a wareness raising, as well uas contined development where issues do exist By improving technical issues faced in the above issues, n cost of productio of sus tainable s plastic wi ll be r educed, allowing for more competit i v e end pricing also. Original product and plastic ma nuf acturers All Academics/Researchers Manufacturers (plastic and product) NGOs Policy makers Policy makers Manufacturers All *It is important to differentiate between some existin g qual ity issues tha t have been observed during robust testin g s of pl as tic, and a per ceived inferiority of product that appears to exist due to historical performance challenges, and changes to smell and the aesthetic s of the pl as ticdur i ng pr ocessing that may make users hesitant to trust in the product. 16 306 Trucost (2016) Scaling Sustainable Plastics Solutions to drive plastics towards a circular economy, with Ocean Recovery Alliance, April 2016. 307 Ibid., Trucost (2016). 359
- Page 307 and 308: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 309 and 310: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 311 and 312: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 313 and 314: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 315 and 316: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 317 and 318: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 319 and 320: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 321 and 322: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 323 and 324: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 325 and 326: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 327 and 328: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 329 and 330: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 331 and 332: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 333 and 334: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 335 and 336: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 337 and 338: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 339 and 340: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 341 and 342: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 343 and 344: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 345 and 346: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 347 and 348: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 349 and 350: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 351 and 352: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 353 and 354: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 355 and 356: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 357: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 361 and 362: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 363 and 364: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 365 and 366: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 367 and 368: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 369 and 370: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 371 and 372: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 373 and 374: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 375 and 376: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 377 and 378: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 379 and 380: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 381 and 382: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 383 and 384: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 385 and 386: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 387 and 388: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 389 and 390: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 391 and 392: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 393 and 394: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 395 and 396: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 397 and 398: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 399 and 400: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 401 and 402: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 403 and 404: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 405 and 406: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
- Page 407 and 408: Third Industrial Revolution Consult
Third Industrial Revolution Consulting Group<br />
Plastics<br />
50% of plastics are disposed immediately after a single-use application, notably packaging,<br />
agricultural sheets and many consumer items. Plastics have grown 8.7% year after year since<br />
1950, now amounting to nearly 300 million tons per year. The cost to the planet’s degraded<br />
natural capital alone exceeds $75 billion per year. Following the current trend, petrochemicalbased<br />
plastics are projected to account for 15 percent of the global carbon budget by 2050. 306<br />
CHALLENGE<br />
Access to feedstock<br />
Quality of end s<br />
product (real)*<br />
Financial issues<br />
Market demand<br />
PLASTIC<br />
Recycled s plastic<br />
Biopolymers<br />
Biopolymers<br />
Recycled<br />
Biopolymers and<br />
recycled<br />
Recycled<br />
Biopolymers and<br />
recycled<br />
Source: Trucost (2015) 307<br />
RELEVANT<br />
STAKEHOLDER<br />
Recyclers/<br />
manufacturers<br />
Plastic<br />
manufacturers<br />
Plastic<br />
manufacturers<br />
Recyclers/<br />
manufacturers<br />
Recyclers/<br />
manufacturers<br />
CAUSE SOLUTION STAKEHOLDERS<br />
Low perceived value of<br />
plastic<br />
Low collectio of pl as tic<br />
at end-of-use<br />
Large scale plant matter<br />
from responsible sources<br />
Some s bioplastic ar e<br />
reported to be inferior in<br />
some qualitie<br />
Low quality feedstock can<br />
jeopardize quality in end<br />
product<br />
Cheap oil commodity<br />
prices<br />
Low volumes of processed<br />
material<br />
Distrust of benefitcl ai ms<br />
End customer not aware<br />
Quality of end product<br />
(perceived)<br />
Higher costs of plastic<br />
Consider ‘true pricing’ – imonetizng e xternalitie s of pl as ticpr oductio n ,<br />
consumptio n and ndi spos al<br />
Producer responsibility n legislatio<br />
Improved access s nto recycling facilitie/ cur b side collectio<br />
Direct takeback of product –taking ownership of recovery<br />
Incorporate industrial waste product – such as lignin, a waste from pulp<br />
and paper sector.<br />
All<br />
Policy makers<br />
Policy makers<br />
Retailers/ product<br />
manufacturers<br />
Investors<br />
Academics/Researchers<br />
Contin un ed inno vatio and de velopment Investors<br />
Academics/Researchers<br />
Improve design for recycling/reuse<br />
Raise awareness of other finnci al bene fit – s tability of feedstock,<br />
brand value, n protectio ag ainst future legislatio n<br />
Develop infrastructure to achieve economies of scale at each step of<br />
value chain<br />
Avoid greenwashing by ensuring benefitof pr oduct i is scientif c ally and<br />
robustly calculated. Use a holisticassessme n t that considers potentia l<br />
trade-offs.<br />
Educate end consumers of the benefitof sus tainable s plastic t o help<br />
drive demand<br />
Improved marketin g and a wareness raising, as well uas contined<br />
development where issues do exist<br />
By improving technical issues faced in the above issues, n cost of<br />
productio of sus tainable s plastic wi ll be r educed, allowing for more<br />
competit i v e end pricing also.<br />
Original product and<br />
plastic<br />
ma nuf acturers<br />
All<br />
Academics/Researchers<br />
Manufacturers (plastic<br />
and product)<br />
NGOs<br />
Policy makers<br />
Policy makers<br />
Manufacturers<br />
All<br />
*It is important to differentiate between some existin g qual ity issues tha t have been observed during robust testin g s of pl as tic, and a per ceived inferiority of product that appears to exist due to historical<br />
performance challenges, and changes to smell and the aesthetic s of the pl as ticdur i ng pr ocessing that may make users hesitant to trust in the product.<br />
16<br />
306 Trucost (2016) Scaling Sustainable Plastics Solutions to drive plastics towards a circular economy, with Ocean<br />
Recovery Alliance, April 2016.<br />
307 Ibid., Trucost (2016).<br />
359