3FOOD

TIR-CG_Luxembourg-Final-Report_Long-Version TIR-CG_Luxembourg-Final-Report_Long-Version

14.11.2016 Views

Third Industrial Revolution Consulting Group between bond issuers / investment fund / loan providers, ESCOs, and the private and public sector as participating organizations. The various contractual agreements that make up the LuxSEF approach and tie together the participants (ESCOs, public and private program participants, bond issuer, and investment funds) need some more explanation. As illustrated in Figure 7 there are two routes available that connect participating organizations (public and private) to the bond issuer via the LSDFP. On the left hand side of Figure 7, a financing window is opened that is especially attractive to the private sector. This financing window, which can be called a “service performance” financing window, relies on contractual agreements that enable off-balance sheet debt placement but is accompanied by less aggressive savings. On the right hand side of Figure 7 a second financing window, which can be called a “guaranteed savings” financing window, relies on a different set of contractual agreements that particularly enable the public sector to pursue aggressive savings. 278

Third Industrial Revolution Consulting Group Figure 7. Overview of the potential workings of a Luxembourg Sustainable Finance Program (LuxSEF) that outlines the various contractual agreements among program participants. The LSDFP takes up a central role as aggregator and communication channel. The strength of the LuxSEF approach lies in the program mechanics of the two financing windows. As described below, the two variants of the model operate in a similar fashion. The key difference between the two variants is the structuring of energy savings and billing. In particular, debt raised under the guaranteed savings variant is placed on the books of the program participants. Such debt obligations are typically less attractive to the private sector and, indeed, this variant of the model has been successfully applied in a public sector context. The guaranteed energy savings model does allow for more aggressive energy savings and unlocks longer investment options with longer payback periods. The second variant, the sustainable energy services option, bills the cost of energy savings on a per kWh basis to the program participant. This bill can be an add-on to existing municipal billing (e.g., waste, sewer, etc.). Program participants, under this variant of the model, do not carry 279

Third Industrial Revolution Consulting Group<br />

between bond issuers / investment fund / loan providers, ESCOs, and the private and public<br />

sector as participating organizations.<br />

The various contractual agreements that make up the LuxSEF approach and tie together the<br />

participants (ESCOs, public and private program participants, bond issuer, and investment<br />

funds) need some more explanation. As illustrated in Figure 7 there are two routes available<br />

that connect participating organizations (public and private) to the bond issuer via the LSDFP.<br />

On the left hand side of Figure 7, a financing window is opened that is especially attractive to<br />

the private sector. This financing window, which can be called a “service performance”<br />

financing window, relies on contractual agreements that enable off-balance sheet debt<br />

placement but is accompanied by less aggressive savings. On the right hand side of Figure 7 a<br />

second financing window, which can be called a “guaranteed savings” financing window, relies<br />

on a different set of contractual agreements that particularly enable the public sector to pursue<br />

aggressive savings.<br />

278

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!