SWINDON BOROUGH COUNCIL AGENDA

Recommendations

Info

N_need_experienced_parish_clerks/cllrs 2 N_stealth_tax_or_get_round_capping 2 O_already_pay_management_company 2 O_concern_about_effect_on_staff 2 O_concern_about_only_50%_transitional_funding 2 O_effect_on_CIL/S106_payments 2 O_ no_further_comment 2 O_oppose_Badbury_Park_parish 2 O_parishes_wont_solve_budget_problem 2 O_reject_term_parish 2 O_risk_SBC_losing_income_to_parishes 2 O_SBC_to_have_intervention_powers 2 O_uneven_tax_services_burden_between_parishes 2 O_using_ward_cllrs_for_shadow_council 2 O_wants_Penhill_in_Haydon_Wick 2 O_wants_Wichestowe_in_Wroughton 2 O_what_else_will_devolve 2 O_will_it_work/lack_of_evidence 2 S_but_concern_about_community_cohesion/identity 2 S_wants_East_Wichel_in_Wroughton 2 N_Borough_to_provide_Borough_services 3 N_boundaries_confusing 3 N_concern_about_extra_costs_and_bureaucracy 3 N_concern_about_loss_of_economies_of_scale 3 N_concern_about_parish_capacity 3 N_double_taxation 3 N_wants_1_large_parish 3 N_wants_a_referendum 3 O_better_use_for_money_spent_on_CGR 3 O_comments_about_shadow_parish 3 O_concern_about_shadow_council_membership 3 O_one_large_parish_larger_taxbase_fairer 3 O_people_cant_afford/wont_pay_precept 3 O_prove_ASC_costs_are_up 3 O_will_not_work 3 S_but_concern_about_service_level 3 S_but_oppose_double_taxation 3 S_support_the_principle 3 Page 44
S_wants_to_retain_Chiseldon_unchanged 3 N_decision_already_made/inevitable 4 N_refers_to_cllrs_leaflet 4 O_cost_of_extra_cllrs 4 O_lobby_central_govt/MPs_more 4 O_merge_with_Wilts 4 O_prefer_different_boundaries 4 O_wants_Haydon_View_to_be_in_Haydon_Wick 4 S_supports_Liden_Eldene_Nythe 4 S_supports_parishes 4 S_want_Badbury_Park_Parish 4 O_different_services/tax_burdens_between_parishes 5 O_one_large_parish_efficient_sustainable 5 O_reject_splitting_existing_parish 5 Other_comments 5 S_but_concern_at_higher_costs/loss_of_efficiency/effectiveness 5 N_are parishes_able_to_deliver 6 O_no_clarity_on_who_is_responsible_for_what 6 O_oppose_large_parishes 6 O_oppose_splitting_parish_BlunsdonStA 6 O_parish_wont_have_enough_tax_base 6 N_concern_about_paying_for_services 7 N_why_these_boundaries 7 O_businesses_should_paying_more 7 O_cost_of_paying_for_other_areas 7 O_imposed/devisive 7 O_not_serving_towns_identity/needs 7 O_one_parish_paying_for_town_centre 7 O_oppose_prefer_different_boundaries 7 O_stop the CGR 7 O_will_not_save_projected_amount 7 S_support_West_Swindon 7 N_not_enough_information/maps_not_clear 8 N_wants_Eastcott_with_Old_Town 8 Other_no_comments_at_all 8 S_but_different_the_boundary/name 8 O_risk_of_needing_parish_CT_referendum 9 O_unanswered_questions 9 Page 45
Page 1 and 2: SWINDON BOROUGH COUNCIL Municipal Y
Page 3: future core library service. This C
Page 6 and 7: Mr Hillier asked the Leader of the
Page 8 and 9: (2) The advice from professional fi
Page 10 and 11: This page is intentionally left bla
Page 12 and 13: Recommendations from the Community
Page 30 and 31: Why undertake this Community Govern
Page 32 and 33: This page is intentionally left bla
Page 34 and 35: A number of respondents used more t
Page 36 and 37: Figure 1: Most Common Responses Tot
Page 38 and 39: codedBy.O_one_parish_paying_for_tow
Page 40 and 41: 13 submissions wanting all of Old T
Page 42 and 43: N_poor_consultation/concerrns 1 N_r
Page 46 and 47: O_implementation_process_too_quick
Page 48 and 49: 1.26 This response has been produce
Page 50 and 51: 1.35 It can be difficult to recruit
Page 52 and 53: Wick to assume Abbey Meads into its
Page 54 and 55: 2. APPENDICES FROM BLUNSDON PARISH
Page 56 and 57: 2.2 Appendix B - Parish Councillor
Page 58 and 59: 2.6 Appendix E - Exit or Remain? Pe
Page 60 and 61: Appendix F - Income and Expenditure
Page 62 and 63: Castle Eaton Parish Council 2.8 No
Page 64 and 65: had been received in Stage 2. Follo
Page 66 and 67: Figure 1 Possible boundary change t
Page 68 and 69: Inglesham Parish 2.36 No representa
Page 70 and 71: Figure 3 Possible boundary change b
Page 72 and 73: 2.55 2.56 2.57 2.58 The Gorse Hill
Page 74 and 75: no intention to make this mandatory
Page 76 and 77: IF, and only IF, SBC insist on purs
Page 78 and 79: does not come from the community. T
Page 80 and 81: 3. Part Two - Stage One and Stage T
Page 82 and 83: genuinely reflect community identit
Page 84 and 85: In view of the small number of peop
Page 86 and 87: Blunsdon St Andrew Parish Council 3
Page 88 and 89: Chiseldon Parish Council voted to r
Page 90 and 91: d) The Parish Council propose that
Page 92 and 93: 3.43 At present Nythe has 7 parish
Page 94 and 95:
further recommended that the number
Page 96 and 97:
3.59 The areas that could be create
Page 98 and 99:
Recommendations to Council 1.8 Cabi
Page 100 and 101:
Recommendations to Council 1.19 The
Page 102 and 103:
Recommendations to Council governan
Page 104 and 105:
Recommendations to Council Recommen
Page 106 and 107:
Recommendations to Council Figure 2
Page 108 and 109:
Recommendations to Council Nythe, E
Page 110 and 111:
Recommendations to Council affected
Page 112 and 113:
Recommendations to Council the Supe
Page 114 and 115:
Recommendations to Council West Swi
Page 116 and 117:
This page is intentionally left bla
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
and that the recommendations have b
Page 122 and 123:
(7) That, in furtherance of the res
Page 124 and 125:
SCRUTINY COMMITTEE MONDAY, 10 OCTOB
Page 126 and 127:
Schools Forum Membership Update Sch
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Appendix 1 - Schools Forum Membersh
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
1972, the public be excluded during
Page 148 and 149:
Fund balances and these will need t
Page 150 and 151:
The correlation between parish boun
Page 152 and 153:
Resolved - (1) That the application
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
The Decision Note (report) sets out
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160:
show all

SWINDON BOROUGH COUNCIL AGENDA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?