28.10.2016 Views

gender differential paper IJCRB

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ijcrb.webs.com<br />

INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS<br />

JUNE 2011<br />

VOL 3, NO 2<br />

Relationship between CSR and SCA<br />

(Case study Body Shop)<br />

Mohammad Eghbali Teimouri<br />

PhD Student University Kebangsaan Malaysia<br />

Bijan Ganji Jamehshooran<br />

Phd student of Industrial Engineering<br />

Ali Reza Heydari<br />

DBA Student Multimedia University<br />

Abstract<br />

This article is trying to provide a new definition of CSR and SCA regarding to Body Shop and<br />

their relation in current heavy globally competitive market at Body Shop as a well known brand.<br />

We examine some theories about CSR and SCA and connect them to Body Shop then the gap in<br />

literature makes it clear that what the differences between literatures are. The <strong>paper</strong>’s approach is<br />

to provide a model to show in what degree CSR and SCA can affect each other and Body Shop<br />

as well. And what are the advantages and coming opportunities for Body Shop in playing the<br />

responsibility role in the market. In this <strong>paper</strong> we provide a model to show the relations between<br />

SCA and CSR. Finally we conclude that we need to use both perspectives in regarding to CSR<br />

and SCA as Body Shop do in its everyday activities.<br />

Keywords: CSR , SCA, marketing, consumer behavior, trust<br />

Introduction<br />

A strategic competitive advantage can be existed when a firm has a product which is considered<br />

by customers as better than of its competitors. For that to happen a firm must care about social<br />

responsibility. Unfortunately most of the entrepreneurs faced with tow myths in creation of a<br />

competitive advantage. One is that firms have lost most of their good opportunities. The other is<br />

that there is not a fair balance between small and big firms so that small firms cannot compete<br />

with big ones. Even if they try to invest in social activities they will fail to be as good as big<br />

firms so it is a big challenge for them to be more responsible to the society. But as we know most<br />

of the companies do not welcome competitors.<br />

As one well-respected author, Karl H. Vesper, puts it:<br />

Established companies do their best to maintain proprietary shields… to ward off prospective as<br />

well as existing competitors. Consequently, the entrepreneur who would create a new competitor<br />

to attack them needs some sort of “entry wedge,” or strategic competitive advantage for<br />

breaking into the established pattern of commercial activity.<br />

In today’s business environment competition is going to be more intense. Although a firm may<br />

be a market pioneer today, the status quo might change overnight. Having competitive advantage<br />

alone is not sufficient. Important factor for being in growth is sustainability; it is the ability<br />

which enables the firms to maintain a competitive advantage. To more competitive regarding to<br />

CSR time is also of the essence. While others are merely finding their orientation to stay abreast<br />

with the latest innovations, the winning company is already moving up to the next level.<br />

COPY RIGHT © 2011 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 556

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!