28.10.2016 Views

gender differential paper IJCRB

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ijcrb.webs.com<br />

JUNE 2011<br />

INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS VOL 3, NO 2<br />

• Stage 2: The instrumental purpose orientation. Children view right action as flowing<br />

from self-interest. Reciprocity is understood as equal exchange of favours.<br />

2. The Conventional Level: At this level, individuals continue to regard conformity to<br />

social rules as important, but not for reasons of self interest. Rather, they believe that<br />

actively maintaining the current social system ensures positive human relationships and<br />

social order. This level consists of following stages:<br />

• Stage 3: The “good boy-good girl" orientation. Individuals want to maintain the<br />

affection and approval of friends and relatives by being a “good person”-trust<br />

worthy, loyal, respectful, helpful, and nice.<br />

• Stage 4: The social order maintaining orientation. The individual believes that laws<br />

can not be disobeyed under any circumstances because they are vital for ensuring<br />

societal order and cooperative relations between individuals.<br />

3. The Post-conventional Level: Individuals at this level move beyond unquestioning<br />

support for the rule and laws of their own society. they defines morality in terms of<br />

abstract principles and values that apply to all situations and societies. This level consist<br />

of two stages:<br />

• Stage 5 : The Social Contract Orientation. Individuals regard laws and rules as<br />

flexible instruments for furthering human purposes.<br />

• Stage 6: The Universal ethical principle orientation. Individuals typically mention<br />

such principles as equal consideration of the claims of all human beings and respect<br />

for the worth and dignity of each person.<br />

Although there is much support for Kohlberg’s theory, it continues to face challenges. The most<br />

important of these concern Kohlberg’s conception of moral maturity and the appropriateness of<br />

his stages for characterizing the moral reasoning of young children.<br />

A key controversy has to do with Kohlberg’ belief that moral maturity is not achieved until the<br />

postconventional level. Byet if people had to reach stages 5 and six to be considered truly<br />

morally mature. Gibbs (2003) argues that “postconventional morality” should not be viewed as<br />

the standardagainst which other levels are judged immature. Gibbs finds maturity in a revised<br />

understanding of stages 3 and 4. these stages are not “conventional,” or based on social<br />

conformity, as Kohlberg assumed. Instead, they require profound moral constructions-and<br />

understanding of ideal reciprocity as the basis of relationship between people( stage 3) and 4<br />

widely accepted moral standards, set forth in rules and laws (stage 4).<br />

The influence of situational factors on moral reasoning indicates that like Piaget’s cognitive<br />

stages, Kohlberg’s moral stages are loosely organized. Rather than developing in a neat, stepwise<br />

fashion, people draw on a range of moral responses that varay with context. With age this range<br />

shifts upward as less mature moral reasoning is gradually replaced by more advanced moral<br />

thought (Fischer & Bidell, 1998) .<br />

COPY RIGHT © 2011 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 1933

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!