28.10.2016 Views

gender differential paper IJCRB

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ijcrb.webs.com<br />

INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS<br />

JUNE 2011<br />

VOL 3, NO 2<br />

last of the two cells in a loop. With CONWIP, an authorization to produce the next batch is<br />

produced when another batch is removed from inventory, regardless of the product type. DBR is<br />

a system in which the master schedule sets the production rate according to the output rate of the<br />

bottleneck resource. Researchers have extensively studied pull strategies; Tayur (1993)<br />

developed theoretical results to characterize the dynamics of kanban systems and reduce the<br />

simulation effort needed to study them. Gstettner and Kuhn (1996) show that the performance of<br />

a kanban system is significantly affected by the distribution of kanban cards.<br />

Figure 1. Push versus Pull System<br />

In the Push scheme each time a demand arrives it immediately authorizes the release of a new<br />

job. The demand is either immediately satisfied from the stock or it is backloged. The Pull<br />

scheme examined is similar to CONWIP (Spearman,1992 ; Spearman et al., 1990 ;<br />

Spearman&Zazanis,1992). The main difference is that instead of the requirement that the WIP in<br />

the system remain constant we require that the total work-in-process including the Finished<br />

Goods Inventory (FGI) remain constant and equal to S. External demands, if not immediately<br />

satisfied, are again backloged. In this scheme the arrival of a demand authorizes the release of a<br />

new job only when the work in process is less than S or equivalently the finished goods<br />

inventory is greater than zero. Proper operation of this scheme, which of course depends<br />

crucially upon the right choice for S, results in the same benefits in terms of increased system<br />

control as other pull systems (Buzacott&Shanthikumar,1993 ; Hall,1983 ; Karmarkar ,1986 ;<br />

Mitra&Mitrani,1990 ; Mitra&Mitrani,1991 ; Spearman et al.,1990 ; Spearman&Zazanis,1992).<br />

2.3.Push/Pull Interface<br />

It is not necessary that a production line be pure push or pure pull. One can design a line so that<br />

a segment of the line operates as push and the another segment operates as pull. We present a<br />

specific example to illustrate this.<br />

2.4.Electronics assembly case in Iran industry<br />

An actual push design electronics assembly system was modeling using the SIMAN<br />

simulation language. The simulation model was a representation of a real electronics assembly<br />

facility prototype line, producing one product style in high volume. Although the prototype<br />

production line is very simple, the case provides an adequate demonstration of these research<br />

methods.<br />

COPY RIGHT © 2011 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!