gender differential paper IJCRB

ijcrb.webs.com
INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS
Table 28 Showing how teacher give frequent example during their class
JUNE 2011
VOL 3, NO 2
Category Ph.D M.Phil Master
No. 38 37 25
% 38 37 25
According to 25% respondents master teachers give less examples during their class. While Ph.D
teachers give frequent examples during their class while 37% favor for M.Phil in this regard.
Table 29 Showing teacher preparation for their lesson
Category Ph.D M.Phil Master
No. 35 36 29
% 35% 36% 29%
According to 29% respondents, the master teachers are not well prepared for their lessons while
the percentage of respondents M.Phil and Ph.D is 35% 36% in this regard.
Table 30 Showing teachers not guide the students during practical works
Category Ph.D M.Phil Master
No. 36 32 32
% 36% 32% 32%
According to 36% respondents, Ph.D degree holder teachers do not take interest and not guide
the students during practical work. While M.Phil and Master teachers have equal response of
students 32% in this regard.
Table 31 Showing linking of new lessons with previous knowledge of the students by the
teachers
Category Ph.D M.Phil Master
No. 30 38 32
% 30% 38% 32%
Table reveals that, according to 38% respondents, M.Phil degree holder teachers do not link new
lesson with previous knowledge 30% and 32% respondents have the same opinions about Ph.D
and Master Degree holders teachers respectively.
COPY RIGHT © 2011 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 1525