14.10.2016 Views

resolver

resolver

resolver

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3 45<br />

m 2 /mmol (based on the N2 isotherm) and does not differ much in contrast to the sample<br />

before “solvent exchange” (i.e. sample 2). Notably, the thermal stability of 2_ex also<br />

slightly decreased after solvent exchange like SBET. Hence, the overall quality of this Ru-<br />

MOF analog is less convincing under the circumstances of this study. Interestingly, in case<br />

of 3_ex, however, an increase of the SBET has been observed from the N2 sorption<br />

isotherms (850 vs. 683 m 2 /mmol) (Table 3.3). The same increase of SBET has also been<br />

observed for the sample 4_ex (941 m 2 /mmol) in comparison with the value before (916<br />

m 2 /mmol), where the residual [BPh4] - has been removed via solvent exchange procedure<br />

although the amount of acetic acid does not differ. Thus, in particular for Ru-MOFs 1 and<br />

3, solvent exchange procedure proved to be a good method to reduce the amount of<br />

residual acid molecules. In both cases the thermal stability, crystallinity and porosity were<br />

preserved. For the material 4, solvent exchange is helpful to wash out the residual [BPh4] -<br />

counter anions to give access to the metal-sites, while keeping the thermal stability and<br />

porosity.<br />

Table 3.3. Comparison of the BET surface area (S BET ) of the Ru-MOFs before (1-4) and after<br />

solvent exchange (1-4_ex) in the unit of m 2 /g and m 2 /mmol. S BET in the unit of m 2 /mmol is<br />

calculated by S BET (m 2 /g) and the corresponding molecular weight (M w ) determined from both EA<br />

and 1 H NMR results. M w of 1-4_ex is obtained from the formula given in Table 3.2. The M w of<br />

sample 1-4 is derived from the difference of the guest molecules between the samples before and<br />

after solvent exchange, namely: M w (1) = M w (1_ex + 3.2 AcOH); M w (2) = M w (2_ex + 0.6 AcOH +<br />

0.2 PivOH); M w (3) = M w (3_ex + 1.4 AcOH); M w (4) = M w (4_ex + 0.13 BPh 4 ).<br />

samples S BET (m 2 /g) S BET (m 2 /mmol)<br />

1 958 1108<br />

1_ex 998 964<br />

2 851 888<br />

2_ex 728 718<br />

3 604 683<br />

3_ex 812 850<br />

4 840 916<br />

4_ex 897 941<br />

[Cu 3 (BTC) 2 ] n<br />

* theoretical accessible surface area.<br />

1734 [83]<br />

2153* [205]<br />

1049<br />

1301

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!