14.10.2016 Views

resolver

resolver

resolver

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

176 Chapter 7<br />

For comparison of the obtained S BET values for Ru-MOFs with the homologous Cu-MOFs, it might<br />

be more informative using m 2 /mmol units (due to substantial difference in the molecular weight<br />

of Cu and Ru and the presence of guest molecules). Thus, the S BET of the parent Ru-MOF (964<br />

m 2 /mmol) is quite similar to that of a typical reference sample [Cu 3 (BTC) 2 ] n (1049 m 2 /mmol).<br />

More importantly, the S BET of the Ru-DEMOF solids slightly increases in comparison with both<br />

parent analogues. Due to the complexity of the composition (which has been mentioned in the<br />

section 4.2.1.2 of Chapter 4), EA was not performed for the rest Ru-DEMOFs to determine the<br />

unambiguous composition with counter-ions and guest molecules. Hence, S BET values in the unit<br />

of m 2 /mmol were not calculated for them.<br />

Figure 7.14. XPS survey scan of the parent Ru-MOF and Ru-DEMOFs (1a, 1c, 1d, 2a and 2b). 1a,<br />

1c and 1d - 8%, 32% and 37% 5-OH-ip incorporation, respectively; 2a and 2b - 15% and 28% ip<br />

incorporation, respectively. Figure is provided by P. Guo.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!