08.12.2012 Views

ESMO-mmartin_GEICAM9805_sep14.ppt

ESMO-mmartin_GEICAM9805_sep14.ppt

ESMO-mmartin_GEICAM9805_sep14.ppt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TAC versus FAC as Adjuvant<br />

Chemotherapy for High-risk<br />

Node-negative Breast Cancer:<br />

Results from the GEICAM 9805 Trial<br />

Martín M, Lluch A, Seguí MA, Ruiz A, Ramos M,<br />

Adrover E, Rodríguez-Lescure Á, Grosse R, Calvo L,<br />

Anton A, on behalf of the Spanish Breast Cancer<br />

Research Group (GEICAM)


Background (1)<br />

• Taxanes improve disease-free survival (DFS)<br />

and overall survival (OS) in node-positive breast<br />

cancer<br />

• However, most patients have node-negative<br />

breast cancer at diagnosis, and about 30% of<br />

them are at high-risk of relapse<br />

• The role of taxanes in this setting is not fully<br />

established<br />

• GEICAM 9805 began in 1998


Background (2)<br />

Database from GEICAM (1990-1993)<br />

Colomer R et al, JCO 22: 961, 2004<br />

Probability of DFS<br />

1.0<br />

0.75<br />

0.50<br />

0.25<br />

0.0<br />

Log-rank P = 0.046<br />

Disease Free Survival<br />

N0<br />

CMF Md=NR n=211<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160<br />

Months<br />

FAC Md=NR n=204<br />

FAC vs CMF as adjuvant chemotherapy<br />

for early breast cancer (GEICAM 8701)<br />

Martin M, et al. Ann Oncol 14:833, 2003


Study design<br />

N=1059<br />

R<br />

Stratification<br />

• Menopausal status<br />

• Center<br />

6 x TAC<br />

6 x FAC<br />

Docetaxel 75 mg/m 2<br />

Doxorubicin 50 mg/m 2<br />

Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m 2<br />

Day 1, every 3 weeks<br />

Fluorouracil 500 mg/m 2<br />

Doxorubicin 50 mg/m 2<br />

Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m 2


Additional treatment<br />

• Radiotherapy<br />

– Mandatory after conservative surgery and<br />

recommended for patients with tumors >5 cm<br />

• Tamoxifen<br />

– For 5 years to all patients with hormone<br />

receptor-positive tumors<br />

• Primary prophylactic G-CSF mandatory in TAC arm<br />

– Protocol amendment after first 237 patients<br />

randomized


Main inclusion criteria<br />

• Age 18–75 years<br />

• Curative surgery for unilateral T1–T3 breast<br />

carcinoma<br />

• No axillary lymph node involvement<br />

– At least 10 lymph nodes examined<br />

• At least one St Gallen 1998 high-risk criterion<br />

– Tumor grade 2 to 3<br />

– Tumors >2 cm<br />

– Age


Main exclusion criteria<br />

• Previous history of cancer<br />

• Abnormal renal, liver, or hematologic function<br />

• Other serious illness or medical conditions<br />

• Abnormal cardiac function (normal LVEF required)<br />

LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction


Objectives<br />

• Primary<br />

– DFS after a minimum follow-up of 5 years<br />

• Secondary<br />

– OS<br />

– Safety<br />

– Prognostic and predictive value of molecular markers<br />

– Quality of life


Statistical considerations<br />

• DFS was defined as the interval from randomization<br />

to the date of breast cancer relapse, contralateral<br />

breast cancer, other primary malignancy or death<br />

from any cause, whichever occurred first<br />

• With 511 evaluable patients in each arm, the trial<br />

has a 90% power to detect an absolute 7.5% DFS<br />

increase (87.5% vs 80.0%) with TAC at 5-year<br />

follow-up


Patient characteristics<br />

TAC FAC<br />

Randomized patients, n 539 520<br />

Median age, years (range)<br />

Age 2 cm<br />

Tumor grade, %*<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

Menopausal status, %<br />

Pre-menopausal<br />

Post-menopausal<br />

Hormone receptor status, %*<br />

ER+ and/or PR+<br />

ER– /PR –<br />

50 (23–74)<br />

42 (7.8)<br />

52.9<br />

47.1<br />

7.1<br />

40.1<br />

48.1<br />

54.4<br />

45.6<br />

63.8<br />

35.6<br />

*Data unknown in a few cases<br />

49 (23–73)<br />

33 (6.4)<br />

47.9<br />

51.9<br />

6.5<br />

44.2<br />

44.2<br />

55.0<br />

45.0<br />

67.1<br />

32.5


Safety


Treatment Exposure<br />

TAC-pre<br />

n=114<br />

TAC-post<br />

n=414<br />

FAC<br />

n=519<br />

Completed 6 cycles, n (%) 103 (90.4%) 396 (95.7%) 505 (97.3%)<br />

Relative dose intensity<br />

Median 0.99 0.99 0.98<br />

Median cumulative dose, mg<br />

Docetaxel 445 448 –<br />

Doxorubicin 298 299 300<br />

Cyclophosphamide 2998 2995 2998<br />

5-FU – – 2998


Grade 2 or greater hematologic and<br />

nonhematologic toxicities<br />

Hematologic toxicity, %<br />

Grade 2–4 anemia<br />

Febrile neutropenia (protocol) *<br />

Febrile neutropenia (NCI-CTC)<br />

Non-hematologic toxicity, %<br />

Asthenia<br />

Anorexia<br />

Myalgia<br />

Dysgeusia<br />

Nail disorder<br />

Stomatitis<br />

TAC-pre<br />

(n=114)<br />

47.4<br />

24.6<br />

27.2<br />

64.0<br />

11.4<br />

14.9<br />

7.9<br />

7.9<br />

35.1<br />

TAC-post<br />

(n=414)<br />

27.5<br />

6.5<br />

7.5<br />

48.1<br />

3.6<br />

7.7<br />

3.1<br />

1.4<br />

23.2<br />

FAC<br />

(n=519)<br />

7.5<br />

2.3<br />

3.1<br />

33.3<br />

2.9<br />

1.2<br />

2.3<br />

1.3<br />

24.5<br />

P value<br />

(TAC-pre vs<br />

TAC-post)<br />


Safety<br />

• There were no toxic deaths<br />

TAC FAC<br />

n % n %<br />

P value<br />

Cardiac toxicity 6 1.1 5 1.0 0.81<br />

Hematologic<br />

neoplasm<br />

1 0.2 1 0.2 1


Efficacy


DFS events<br />

• 142 DFS events as of the cut-off (18 April 2008)<br />

– 58 in the TAC arm<br />

– 84 in the FAC arm<br />

First DFS event TAC (n) FAC (n)<br />

Breast cancer recurrence 44 58<br />

Second breast malignancy 3 11<br />

Other second malignancy 8 12<br />

Deaths without event 3 3


DFS<br />

Survival distribution function<br />

Median follow up: 67 months<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

Number of patients<br />

Events<br />

HR=0.67 [95% CI, 0.48–0.94]<br />

Stratified log-rank p=0.0181<br />

91%<br />

86%<br />

0.0 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96<br />

Disease-free survival (months)<br />

TAC FAC<br />

539 520<br />

58 (11%) 84 (16%)


DFS<br />

Median follow up: 67 months<br />

Survival distribution function<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

HR=0.67 [95% CI, 0.48–0.94]<br />

Stratified log-rank p=0.0181<br />

86%<br />

FAC<br />

0.0 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96<br />

Disease-free survival (months)<br />

80%


DFS<br />

Survival distribution function<br />

Median follow up: 67 months<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

HR=0.67 [95% CI, 0.48–0.94]<br />

Stratified log-rank p=0.0181<br />

91%<br />

TAC<br />

0.0 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96<br />

Disease-free survival (months)<br />

89%


Risk reductions<br />

• 33% reduction in risk of relapse with TAC<br />

(HR for DFS: 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48–0.94; P=0.0181)<br />

• 30% reduction in risk of death with TAC (HR<br />

for OS: 0.70; 95% CI, 0.41–1.22; P=0.21),<br />

however data not yet mature<br />

– 53 deaths; TAC 22, FAC 31


DFS subgroup analysis<br />

Menopausal status<br />

Hazard ratio (95%, CI)<br />

Overall DFS 0.67 (0.48, 0.94)<br />

Hormone-receptor (HR) status<br />

HR + 0.59 (0.36, 0.95)<br />

HR – 0.73 (0.45, 1.16)<br />

Post-menopausal 0.73 (0.44, 1.20)<br />

Pre-menopausal 0.63 (0.40, 0.99)<br />

Number of high-risk features<br />

1 0.64 (0.30, 1.39)<br />

2 0.69 (0.47, 0.99) ≥<br />

0.2<br />

0.4 0.6<br />

Favors<br />

TAC<br />

0.8<br />

1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6<br />

Favors<br />

FAC


Conclusions<br />

• First trial of purely high-risk, node-negative breast<br />

cancer patients to show an efficacy benefit with taxane<br />

treatment<br />

• TAC is superior to FAC, resulting in a 33% reduction in<br />

risk of relapse at 5 years<br />

• TAC side effects are mainly hematological and are<br />

manageable with primary G-CSF<br />

• GEICAM 9805 confirms BCIRG001 that TAC is proven<br />

effective both in node positive and in high risk node<br />

negative early stage breast cancer


Acknowledgments<br />

• We thank the 1059 patients who participated in<br />

this trial<br />

• All participating centers and investigators<br />

• This trial was co-sponsored by GEICAM and<br />

sanofi-aventis


Participating centers<br />

SPAIN<br />

Arnau de Vilanova (Lérida)<br />

Arnau de Vilanova (Val.)<br />

Arquitecto Marcide<br />

Barbastro<br />

Basurto<br />

C.O. de Galicia<br />

C.S. de Terrasa<br />

Ciudad de Jaén<br />

Clinic<br />

Clínica Corachán<br />

Clínico de Valencia<br />

Clínico San Carlos<br />

Clínico San Cecilio<br />

F.H. de Alcorcón<br />

General de Albacete<br />

General de Elche<br />

General de Elda<br />

GERMANY<br />

Klinik und Poliklinik<br />

Klinikum Quedlinburg<br />

GmbH<br />

Kreiskrankenhaus<br />

Donaueschingen<br />

POLAND<br />

Serafín Morales<br />

Vicente Alberola<br />

Laura de Paz Arias<br />

Jesús Florian Gericó<br />

Purificación Mtez del Prado<br />

Manuel Ramos Vázquez<br />

Angels Arcusa Lanza<br />

Margarita Fdez Morales<br />

Montserrat Muñoz<br />

Alfonso Modollel<br />

Ana Lluch<br />

Miguel Martín<br />

José Luis García Puche<br />

Carlos Jara Sánchez<br />

Antonio Fdez Aramburo<br />

Alvaro Rguez Lescure<br />

Cristina Llorca<br />

R. Grosse<br />

O. Boldt<br />

M. Eberl<br />

General de Vic<br />

General Univ. de<br />

Alicante<br />

Germans Trias i Pujol<br />

H. de la Ribera<br />

Insular Las Palmas<br />

IVO<br />

Juan Canalejo<br />

La Fe de Valencia<br />

La Princesa<br />

Lozano Blesa<br />

Marqués de Valdecilla<br />

Miguel Servet<br />

Montecelo<br />

Ntra. Sra. de Aránzazu<br />

Parc Taulí<br />

Puerta del Mar<br />

Puerto Real<br />

St. Marien-<br />

Kankenhaus<br />

Städtisches Klinikum<br />

Universitätsfrauenkli<br />

nik<br />

Rosa Mª Franquesa<br />

Encarna Adrover<br />

Agustín Barnadas<br />

José Miguel Cuevas Sanz<br />

Adolfo Murias Rosales<br />

Amparo Ruiz<br />

Lourdes Calvo<br />

Blanca Munárriz<br />

Amalia Velasco<br />

Dolores Isla Casado<br />

José Manuel López Vega<br />

Antonio Antón Torres<br />

Manuel Constenla<br />

Isabel Alvarez López<br />

Miguel Angel Seguí<br />

José Manuel Baena<br />

Antonio Lorenzo Peñuelas<br />

Matthias Losch<br />

Med. Melchert<br />

Carsten Oberhoff<br />

Poznan (Wielkopolskie) Jerzy Zaluski Wojewodzki Szpital Piotr Koralewski<br />

Ramón y Cajal<br />

Reina Sofía<br />

Río Carrión<br />

Rodríguez<br />

Chamorro<br />

Ruber Internacional<br />

Sant Joan Reus<br />

Santa María Nai<br />

Universitario de<br />

Salamanca<br />

Virgen Blanca<br />

Virgen de la Luz<br />

Virgen de la Victoria<br />

Virgen de los Lirios<br />

Virgen del Rocío<br />

Xeral Calde de<br />

Lugo<br />

Xeral Cíes de Vigo<br />

Universitätskliniken<br />

Homburg<br />

Carmen Crespo<br />

Enrique Aranda<br />

Alberto Arizcun<br />

Marta Navalón<br />

Pedro Aramburo<br />

Amadeu Pelegrí<br />

Manuel Rubén Rodríguez<br />

Amalia Gómez Bernal<br />

Andrés García Palomo<br />

Eduardo Martínez de Dueñas<br />

Emilio Alba Conejo<br />

Amparo Oltra<br />

Luis Iglesias Pérez<br />

José Ramón Mel Lorenzo<br />

Javier Castellanos<br />

Prof. Schmidt

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!