08.12.2012 Views

Appellant Brief - Turtle Talk

Appellant Brief - Turtle Talk

Appellant Brief - Turtle Talk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(c) To indemnify the landowners against any liability for<br />

damages to life or property arising from the occupancy or use<br />

of the lands by the applicant.<br />

(d) To restore the lands as nearly as may be possible to their<br />

original condition upon the completion of construction.<br />

(e) That the applicant will not interfere with the use of the lands<br />

by or under the authority of the landowners for any purpose not<br />

inconsistent with the primary purpose for which the right-ofway<br />

was granted.<br />

JA0069 (emphasis added.)<br />

But the stipulation submitted by the Commissioner of Highways did not<br />

satisfy the requirement that it “expressly agree[]” to the conditions under § 256.7.<br />

The stipulation states:<br />

Pursuant to the application by the undersigned, as Commissioner of<br />

Highways of the State of Minnesota, dated April 7, 1955, for a public<br />

highway right of way across a portion of the Red Lake Indian<br />

Reservation, the undersigned agrees to conform and abide by all<br />

pertinent rules and regulations of the Department of the Interior with<br />

special reference to Departmental Regulations 25 CFR 256.7 (a), (b),<br />

and (e) published in the Federal Register of August 21, 1951, pursuant<br />

to the Act of Feb. 5, 1948 (62 Stat. 17).<br />

JA0062. 14 While the Commissioner expressly agreed to (a), (b), and (e), he<br />

omitted any direct reference to the remaining conditions (c) and (d). The omission<br />

14The copy of the stipulation submitted by the Nords is not clear, and the<br />

District Court read the “e” as “c”.<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!