08.12.2012 Views

Appellant Brief - Turtle Talk

Appellant Brief - Turtle Talk

Appellant Brief - Turtle Talk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Strate v. A-1 Contractors, 520 U.S. 438 (1997)<br />

Montana v. United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981)<br />

Kleinheider v. Phillips Pipe Line Co., 528 F.2d 837 (8th Cir. 1975)<br />

2. Whether the District Court erred in denying <strong>Appellant</strong> Tribal Court’s motion<br />

for discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f), and instead granting Appellees’<br />

Motion for Summary Judgment, where the Tribal Court had not, under the<br />

unusual procedural circumstances of the interrelated tribal and federal cases.<br />

had an adequate opportunity to conduct discovery on the right-of-way at<br />

issue, the State’s treatment of the Red Lake Reservation generally, the<br />

course of performance of the parties to that right-of-way since its alleged<br />

inception, the Appellees’ use of that right-of-way, and related matters.<br />

Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f)<br />

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986)<br />

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986)<br />

Robinson v. Terex Corp., 439 F.3d 465 (8th Cir. 2006)<br />

3. Whether the District Court erred in holding that a valid right-of-way is in<br />

force, and cannot be challenged, for the site on which the accident occurred<br />

where, among other inadequacies, the State of Minnesota failed to<br />

“expressly agree[]” to all five stipulations required by regulation for an<br />

Indian land right-of-way application.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!