27.08.2016 Views

Četiri Razine Čiste, niske cijene, Zaboravljeni Vode Tehnologije za Industrijske / Komercijalnim / Poljoprivredne Aplikacije(Sažetak prezentacije na hrvatskom jeziku)// Four Levels of Clean, Low Cost..

Across industries and science fields, previously not accepted technologies, some of which has been widely used for commercialized applications, are gradually being re-confirmed by mainstream Western academics. The next phase is how Western mainstream media of various levels(from news, science reports, to Wikipedia) are going to express these confirmations.

Across industries and science fields, previously not accepted technologies, some of which has been widely used for commercialized applications, are gradually being re-confirmed by mainstream Western academics. The next phase is how Western mainstream media of various levels(from news, science reports, to Wikipedia) are going to express these confirmations.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• 27’Time variant Magnetic Field water treatment:<br />

continued 3, Historical tech status 2<br />

• -->> cont: ●ii- Rotating Magnetic field(RMF) type:<br />

Its has much stronger & drastic effect due to prolonged Magnetic field exposure<br />

accompanied by microplasma generation(ie more like plasma induction effect). Product<br />

using Rotating Magnetic mechanics are marked with * . Effects <strong>of</strong> RMF/Spatially<br />

Motio<strong>na</strong>l Electric Field(including claimed to demonstrate gravity shielding effect) have<br />

been disputed and recently avoided largely in western academics probably due to<br />

"overunity" ambient electricity production capacity and gravity related mechanics: for<br />

more details go to other report [Cold Fusion & A<strong>na</strong>lysis <strong>of</strong> Other Controversial Claims...]<br />

and look up "unshieldable moving magnetic field"<br />

• In west, mainstream low cost disruptive tech funding <strong>of</strong>ten comes for debunking<br />

method creation & not much for actual technology development, while encouragement<br />

for low cost tech is usually given in non West gov't, non-multi<strong>na</strong>tio<strong>na</strong>l NGOs(Russia,<br />

Chi<strong>na</strong>, India etc) and 3rd world(Middle East, Indonesia etc).<br />

• For some low cost & potentially disruptive technologies, there seems to be two groups<br />

<strong>of</strong> science established in West: A-Actual effect using technological commerciali<strong>za</strong>tion,<br />

B-“Discussion level <strong>of</strong> science” or “debunking specialist” type to publish one time<br />

debunking experiment in order to prevent it from widely recognized at public<br />

announcement <strong>of</strong> installation/open admission <strong>of</strong> money saving results at WM media.<br />

Latter group seems to be usually better funded and widely interlocked<br />

143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!