31.07.2016 Views

Cause Principle Unity

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Cause</strong>, principle and unity<br />

the formal principle? I leave for a better and more detailed analysis the<br />

examination of the thousand natural reasons that can be added to this<br />

topical or logical one.<br />

DICSONO. I am not concerned to have you exert yourself over this<br />

point, for there is no philosopher enjoying some reputation, even among<br />

the Peripatetics, who does not hold that the world and its spheres are<br />

animated in some way. For now, I would like to understand how, in your<br />

opinion, this form comes to introduce itself into the matter of the universe.<br />

TEOFILO. It joins itself to it in such a way that the nature of the body,<br />

which is not beautiful in itself, comes to participate as far as it can in beauty,<br />

for there is no beauty which does not consist of some species or form, and<br />

there is no form that is not produced by the soul.<br />

DICSONO. I seem to be hearing something very novel. Are you claiming,<br />

perhaps, that not only the form of the universe, but also all the forms<br />

of natural things are souls?<br />

TEOFILO. Yes.<br />

DICSONO. But who will agree with you there?<br />

TEOFILO. But who could reasonably refute it?<br />

DICSONO. Common sense tells us that not everything is alive.<br />

TEOFILO. The most common sense is not the truest sense.<br />

DICSONO. I can readily believe that that last point is defensible. But it<br />

is not enough for one to be be able to defend a thing to render it true: we<br />

must be able to provide a proof.<br />

TEOFILO. That is not difficult. Are there not philosophers who say that<br />

the world is animated?<br />

DICSONO. Many of the leading ones do say so.<br />

TEOFILO. Then, why do those same philosophers not declare that the<br />

world’s parts are animated?<br />

DICSONO. They, indeed, say it, but only of the principal parts, those<br />

which are the true parts of the world, for when they affirm that the soul is<br />

entire in the entire world, and entire in any of its parts, they are as reasonable<br />

as when they hold that the soul of living creatures we can perceive is<br />

wholly present throughout their bodies.<br />

TEOFILO. So, which do you think are not true parts of the world?<br />

DICSONO. Those which are not primary bodies, as the Peripatetics call<br />

them: the Earth, with the waters and other parts that, as you say, constitute<br />

the entire creature, along with the moon, the sun and other bodies. Besides<br />

these principal organisms, there are those that are not primary parts of the<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!