Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Cause</strong>, principle and unity<br />
the formal principle? I leave for a better and more detailed analysis the<br />
examination of the thousand natural reasons that can be added to this<br />
topical or logical one.<br />
DICSONO. I am not concerned to have you exert yourself over this<br />
point, for there is no philosopher enjoying some reputation, even among<br />
the Peripatetics, who does not hold that the world and its spheres are<br />
animated in some way. For now, I would like to understand how, in your<br />
opinion, this form comes to introduce itself into the matter of the universe.<br />
TEOFILO. It joins itself to it in such a way that the nature of the body,<br />
which is not beautiful in itself, comes to participate as far as it can in beauty,<br />
for there is no beauty which does not consist of some species or form, and<br />
there is no form that is not produced by the soul.<br />
DICSONO. I seem to be hearing something very novel. Are you claiming,<br />
perhaps, that not only the form of the universe, but also all the forms<br />
of natural things are souls?<br />
TEOFILO. Yes.<br />
DICSONO. But who will agree with you there?<br />
TEOFILO. But who could reasonably refute it?<br />
DICSONO. Common sense tells us that not everything is alive.<br />
TEOFILO. The most common sense is not the truest sense.<br />
DICSONO. I can readily believe that that last point is defensible. But it<br />
is not enough for one to be be able to defend a thing to render it true: we<br />
must be able to provide a proof.<br />
TEOFILO. That is not difficult. Are there not philosophers who say that<br />
the world is animated?<br />
DICSONO. Many of the leading ones do say so.<br />
TEOFILO. Then, why do those same philosophers not declare that the<br />
world’s parts are animated?<br />
DICSONO. They, indeed, say it, but only of the principal parts, those<br />
which are the true parts of the world, for when they affirm that the soul is<br />
entire in the entire world, and entire in any of its parts, they are as reasonable<br />
as when they hold that the soul of living creatures we can perceive is<br />
wholly present throughout their bodies.<br />
TEOFILO. So, which do you think are not true parts of the world?<br />
DICSONO. Those which are not primary bodies, as the Peripatetics call<br />
them: the Earth, with the waters and other parts that, as you say, constitute<br />
the entire creature, along with the moon, the sun and other bodies. Besides<br />
these principal organisms, there are those that are not primary parts of the<br />
42