Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Cause</strong>, principle and unity<br />
TEOFILO. Without the slightest doubt or dispute.<br />
DICSONO. Do you believe, then, that whoever knows the things caused<br />
and principled, may know the cause and principle?<br />
TEOFILO. It is not easy concerning the proximate cause and principle;<br />
and it is extremely arduous, even by way of traces, when dealing with the<br />
first cause and first principle.<br />
DICSONO. So how do you conceive that things which have both a first<br />
and proximate cause and principle can be truly known if, as far as the<br />
efficient cause is concerned (which is one of the causes that contribute to<br />
the authentic knowledge of things), they remain hidden?<br />
TEOFILO. I confess that it is an easy thing to set out a demonstrative<br />
doctrine, but the demonstration itself is hard. It is very easy to organize<br />
the causes, modes and methods of doctrines, but our method-makers and<br />
analysts then apply their instruments, the principles of their methods and<br />
art of arts poorly.<br />
GERVASIO. Like men who know how to forge fine swords, but not to<br />
wield them.<br />
POLIINNIO. Ferme [Certainly].<br />
GERVASIO. Would that one could firmly shut your eyes and keep you<br />
from ever opening them again! 1<br />
TEOFILO. That is why I say that the natural philosopher is not required<br />
to produce all causes and all principles, but merely the physical ones, and<br />
among them, only those that are principal or pertinent. Therefore,<br />
although their dependence on the first cause and first principle attributes<br />
them to that cause or that principle, there is not such a necessary relation<br />
that, from the knowledge of one, we can infer a knowledge of the other, and<br />
that is why we do not require that they be discussed within a single system.<br />
DICSONO. How is that?<br />
TEOFILO. Because from the knowledge of all dependent things, we<br />
cannot infer any cognition of the first principle or of the first cause, other<br />
than by the less effectual method of vestiges; seeing that everything derives<br />
from its will or goodness, which is the principle of its operation, whence<br />
proceeds the universal effect. The same can be said of artistic products,<br />
insofar as whoever sees the statue does not behold the sculptor, and the man<br />
who sees the portrait of Helen does not see Apelles, but only the result<br />
of an operation deriving from the excellence of Apelles’ talent. The<br />
representation is wholly the effect of accidents and circumstances of the<br />
1 The latin ferme is taken jokingly by Gervasio as a term related to the Italian fermare, ‘to shut’.<br />
34