You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Fifth dialogue<br />
one, nor being, nor the true, because he did not recognize being as one.<br />
Although he could have adopted the meaning of being which is common<br />
to substance and accident, and further, distinguished his categories according<br />
to as many genera and species as there are specific differences, nonetheless<br />
he perceived truth badly, not going deeply enough into the knowledge<br />
of this unity and of this indistinction of the eternal nature and eternal<br />
being. With his harmful explanations and his irresponsible arguments, this<br />
arid sophist perverted the sense of the ancients and hampered the truth,<br />
less, perhaps, out of intellectual weakness, than out of jealousy and ambition.<br />
DICSONO. So that this world, this being, this truth, this universe, this<br />
infinity, this immensity is found entire in each of its parts: it is the ubique<br />
[everywhere] itself. Thus, everything in the universe, in relation to the universe,<br />
exists everywhere according to its capacity, whatever its relation<br />
might be with other particular bodies; for it is above, below, right, left and<br />
so on, in keeping with all local differences, since, in the totality of the infinite,<br />
there are all these differences and none of them. Whatever thing we<br />
take in the universe, it has in itself that which is entire everywhere, and<br />
hence comprehends, in its own way, the entire world soul (although, as we<br />
have said, it does not comprehend it totally), and that world soul is entire<br />
in every part of the universe. This is why, even if the act is one and constitutes<br />
a single being, wherever it may be found, we must not think that there<br />
is, in the world, a plurality of substance and of that which is truly being.<br />
Following on this, I know that you take as manifest that each of these<br />
innumerable worlds, which we see in the universe, is not found there so<br />
much as if in a containing site, nor as in an interval or a space, but is found<br />
there as in a place that comprehends it, a conserver, mover and efficient,<br />
which itself is comprised in its entirety in each of these worlds, as the soul<br />
is found in its entirety in each of the parts of that world. For that reason,<br />
although a particular world moves towards or around another, as the earth<br />
moves to and around the sun, nonetheless, with respect to the universe,<br />
nothing moves to or around it, but only within it.<br />
You, further, hold that, just as the soul (to take up the common way of<br />
speaking once more) pervades that great mass to which it gives being,<br />
remaining altogether indivisible, so that it is altogether present in the whole<br />
and any of its parts, so the essence of the universe is one both in the infinite<br />
and in anything taken as a member of the universe; so that, substantially,<br />
the whole and each of its parts are but one. In your opinion, Parmenides<br />
was, therefore, right to say that the universe is one, infinite and immobile<br />
91