Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Cause</strong>, principle and unity<br />
the head with his comparison between matter and woman. He says that<br />
women are no more content with males than matter is with forms, and so<br />
forth.<br />
TEOFILO. Seeing that matter does not receive anything from form, why<br />
do you think it desires it? If (as we have said) it brings forms out of its<br />
bosom and so possesses them in itself, how can you claim that it desires<br />
them? It does not desire those forms which daily change on its back, for<br />
every ordered thing desires that from which it receives perfection. And<br />
what can a corruptible thing bring to an eternal one? What can an imperfect<br />
thing, as is the form of sensible things, which is always in movement,<br />
give to another so perfect that, if well pondered, is understood to be a divine<br />
being in things, as perhaps David of Dinant meant, who was so poorly<br />
understood by those who reported his opinion? 20 Matter does not desire<br />
form in order to be preserved by it, because a corruptible thing does not<br />
preserve an eternal one. Moreover, since matter clearly preserves form,<br />
form must desire matter in order to perpetuate itself, and not the other way<br />
around. For when form is separated from matter it ceases to exist, as is not<br />
the case with matter, which has all it had before the coming of form and<br />
which can have other forms as well. Not to mention that when we speak of<br />
the cause of corruption, we do not say that the form flees from matter or<br />
that it leaves matter, but that matter throws off one form to assume another.<br />
There is as little reason to say that matter desires form as that it hates it (I<br />
mean those forms that are generated and corrupted, because it cannot<br />
desire the source of forms, which it has within itself, because nothing<br />
desires what it possesses). By the same line of reasoning, according to<br />
which it is said to desire what it sometimes receives or produces, it can also<br />
be said to abhor whatever it throws off or rejects. In fact, it detests more<br />
fervidly than it desires, for it eternally throws off that individual form after<br />
retaining it a very short while. If you will remember this, that matter rejects<br />
as many forms as it assumes, you must agree with me when I say that it<br />
loathes form, just as I can allow your statements concerning desire.<br />
GERVASIO. Here lie, then, in ruins not only Poliinnio’s castles, but also<br />
others’.<br />
POLIINNIO. Parcius ista viris [Do not boast too much].<br />
DICSONO. We have learned enough for today. Until tomorrow.<br />
20 David of Dinant, author of De tomis idest de divisionibus. ‘Thou who reported his opinion’ probably<br />
refers to Aquinas, Summa contra Gentiles (I, XVII), where David of Dinant is said to have identified<br />
God with matter.<br />
86