31.07.2016 Views

Cause Principle Unity

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Cause</strong>, principle and unity<br />

the head with his comparison between matter and woman. He says that<br />

women are no more content with males than matter is with forms, and so<br />

forth.<br />

TEOFILO. Seeing that matter does not receive anything from form, why<br />

do you think it desires it? If (as we have said) it brings forms out of its<br />

bosom and so possesses them in itself, how can you claim that it desires<br />

them? It does not desire those forms which daily change on its back, for<br />

every ordered thing desires that from which it receives perfection. And<br />

what can a corruptible thing bring to an eternal one? What can an imperfect<br />

thing, as is the form of sensible things, which is always in movement,<br />

give to another so perfect that, if well pondered, is understood to be a divine<br />

being in things, as perhaps David of Dinant meant, who was so poorly<br />

understood by those who reported his opinion? 20 Matter does not desire<br />

form in order to be preserved by it, because a corruptible thing does not<br />

preserve an eternal one. Moreover, since matter clearly preserves form,<br />

form must desire matter in order to perpetuate itself, and not the other way<br />

around. For when form is separated from matter it ceases to exist, as is not<br />

the case with matter, which has all it had before the coming of form and<br />

which can have other forms as well. Not to mention that when we speak of<br />

the cause of corruption, we do not say that the form flees from matter or<br />

that it leaves matter, but that matter throws off one form to assume another.<br />

There is as little reason to say that matter desires form as that it hates it (I<br />

mean those forms that are generated and corrupted, because it cannot<br />

desire the source of forms, which it has within itself, because nothing<br />

desires what it possesses). By the same line of reasoning, according to<br />

which it is said to desire what it sometimes receives or produces, it can also<br />

be said to abhor whatever it throws off or rejects. In fact, it detests more<br />

fervidly than it desires, for it eternally throws off that individual form after<br />

retaining it a very short while. If you will remember this, that matter rejects<br />

as many forms as it assumes, you must agree with me when I say that it<br />

loathes form, just as I can allow your statements concerning desire.<br />

GERVASIO. Here lie, then, in ruins not only Poliinnio’s castles, but also<br />

others’.<br />

POLIINNIO. Parcius ista viris [Do not boast too much].<br />

DICSONO. We have learned enough for today. Until tomorrow.<br />

20 David of Dinant, author of De tomis idest de divisionibus. ‘Thou who reported his opinion’ probably<br />

refers to Aquinas, Summa contra Gentiles (I, XVII), where David of Dinant is said to have identified<br />

God with matter.<br />

86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!