31.07.2016 Views

Cause Principle Unity

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fourth dialogue<br />

acquiring dimensions, one must consider corporeal matter as contrary to<br />

its nature, and that if this is so, it would not be likely that the two sorts of<br />

matter should have a common nature before one of them is conceived as<br />

being contracted to corporeal matter. I add, as I was saying, that we can just<br />

as well attribute to that first matter the necessity of having all dimensional<br />

acts, than (as you would have it) their impossibility. Since this matter is, in<br />

act, all that it can be, it has all measures and has all species of figures and<br />

dimensions. Because it has them all, it has none of them, since what is so<br />

many different things is necessarily none of them in particular. What is<br />

everything must exclude all particular being.<br />

DICSONO. Do you claim, then, that matter is act? Do you also claim<br />

that matter in incorporeal things coincides with act?<br />

TEOFILO. Yes, as the possibility to be coincides with being.<br />

DICSONO. Then, it does not differ from form?<br />

TEOFILO. It does not differ at all in the absolute potency and absolute<br />

act, and, because it is absolutely all, is therefore absolutely pure, simple,<br />

indivisible and unified. If it possessed definite dimensions, a definite being,<br />

a definite property and a definite individuality, it would not be absolute, nor<br />

would it be all.<br />

DICSONO. Then, everything which comprises all the genuses is indivisible?<br />

TEOFILO. Exactly, because the form which comprises all the qualities<br />

is itself none of them; that which comprises all figures does not itself possess<br />

any; that which possesses all sensible being is not, for that reason,<br />

accessible to the senses. That which possesses all natural being is highly<br />

indivisible; that which possesses all intellectual being is still more highly<br />

indivisible; that which possesses all that can be is the most highly indivisible<br />

of all.<br />

DICSONO. You hold that there exists a ladder of the possibility to be,<br />

like the ladder of being? And you hold that material nature ascends along<br />

the one just as formal nature ascends along the other?<br />

TEOFILO. That is true.<br />

DICSONO. You give a lofty and profound definition of matter and<br />

potency.<br />

TEOFILO. True again.<br />

DICSONO. But this truth will not be grasped by everyone, for it is indeed<br />

hard to understand how it is possible to possess all the species of dimensions<br />

without having any, and to possess all formal being, and yet no form.<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!