11.07.2016 Views

writing_womans_lives_symposium_paper_book_v2

writing_womans_lives_symposium_paper_book_v2

writing_womans_lives_symposium_paper_book_v2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In 1946, Anna gave birth to a daughter, Maria Wanda, nicknamed “Tula”. In 1948, she became a<br />

widow. From this year she belonged to the Polish PEN Club. In the same year, she received the Prize<br />

of the City of Wrocław, in 1951she was honored with the State Prize of the third degree. In 1954,<br />

after traveling to East Germany and Soviet Union, she moved to Warsaw to live along with her<br />

daughter and her partner, Maria Dąbrowska.<br />

Kowalska served on the Committee of Defenders of Peace, therefore, she participated in the<br />

World Congress of Peace Forces in Finland (1955) and the Special Session of the World Peace Council<br />

in Sweden (1956). Between 1957 and 1960, she published <strong>book</strong> reviews and prose.<br />

In March 1964, she signed the famous “Letter of thirty four” leading Polish intellectuals to the<br />

Polish Prime Minister, which called for the freedom of culture. In 1965, after the death of Maria<br />

Dąbrowska, she was virtually destitute. In addition, in 1966, Anna started to suffer from breast<br />

cancer, which required frequent in‐hospital treatment. After the settlement of issues related to the<br />

testament of Maria Dąbrowska, she supervised editorial work on the legacy of the writer. Anna<br />

Kowalska died on March 7, 1969 in Warsaw.<br />

The title of my <strong>paper</strong>, Relations trouble is a conscious reference to the title of the Polish<br />

translation of Judith Butler's classic work Gender Trouble. In my research, I assume, like Butler, that<br />

the identity of the subject is unstable and must be constantly re‐defined 2 . By keeping a diary, Anna<br />

Kowalska uses the performative power of <strong>writing</strong> and defines herself constantly in relation to each<br />

relationship. Entanglement in relationships is an uncomfortable state, from which she is unable to<br />

break free. The diarist is always embroiled in some relationship: emotional, social, contextual. She<br />

exists always in relation to the others, to the external world, to herself in the future. The liberation<br />

from relationships is not only impossible, but also suicidal, because it is they who ultimately secure of<br />

the existence of the diarist.<br />

The manuscript kept in The Museum of Literature consists of a <strong>paper</strong> in the form of note<strong>book</strong>s or<br />

pads, written with a pen or pencil. It is supplemented by a range of additional materials: bonded<br />

news<strong>paper</strong> articles, dried leaves, images (photos, watercolors painted picture and Kowalska's<br />

drawings). As such, Kowalska’s diary can be defined as both a personal archive and the archive of<br />

creative, literary work. Most probably Anna Kowalska provided additional items in the manuscript to<br />

preserve the memory of fleeting sensations and save her “traces”. It reflects her need to document<br />

the current state of mind, which is also an act of memorization. However, Kowalska does not create<br />

“the text of life”. She had no such ambitions. She writes a diary which is to serve as a form of selfanalysis<br />

and self‐therapy rather than an archive of her life. This corresponds with works of Philippe<br />

Lejeune, the expert in autobiographical <strong>writing</strong>, who stresses out the selectivity of diary as a genre,<br />

its focus on the emotional states of the diarist. 3 Anna Kowalska wrote: “The least that I write is when<br />

most of the things are happening” 4 . When many things happen, Kowalska has no time to write her<br />

impressions down at all or. If she does, she notes only on what is most important, usually the most<br />

painful events. Indeed, usually in her diary vital topics are not mentioned.<br />

Anna Kowalska in her diary confirmed the presence of a very strong emotional attachment<br />

between the two women. The very existence of such a bond contradicts the acceptable social role of<br />

a woman, that of being a wife and mother, but also of a woman as a heterosexual, which is<br />

widespread in our culture. In the <strong>book</strong>let, which was later re‐written by a diarist, on May 22, 1943<br />

Anna Kowalska wrote the following:<br />

Night had been erotically half‐satisfactory, but we had a good conversation. M. says<br />

that love of a woman to a woman has no chance of development. Once again, she stated<br />

that she does not love me, but she does care about me. Such moments fill me with<br />

furious hatred. I desire to be freed from the feelings that are somewhat abused,<br />

misdirected. This manifests itself as crying without tears, feeling nauseous in the chest. I<br />

tremble. I freeze completely. My sadness is like a shadow of passing clouds. I feel the<br />

desire to possess, to destroy her. The desire to die. Helplessness. Irritability. Insatiability.<br />

Desire to grow, I feel it in the contraction of the face, I suppose that if I could see in the<br />

mirror then it would be a face of smiling a blissfully‐dead smile. 5<br />

877

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!