01.07.2016 Views

The Malayan Communist Party as Recorded in the Comintern Files

WP2016-01

WP2016-01

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Shanghai. In general, communications between <strong>the</strong> FEB and <strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g circles of<br />

<strong>the</strong> CCP <strong>in</strong> Shanghai were comparatively smooth but those between <strong>the</strong> FEB and<br />

CCP’s various organizations <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r places did not p<strong>as</strong>s e<strong>as</strong>ily <strong>the</strong>n.<br />

When he stayed <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong, Ho Chi M<strong>in</strong>h sent mail to <strong>the</strong> FEB <strong>in</strong> Shanghai. Ho<br />

used such pseudonyms <strong>as</strong> L.M. Vuong and Wang Shan-yi. 16<br />

With regard to Ho Chi M<strong>in</strong>h’s letters, Kurihara h<strong>as</strong> also written that between 1930 and 1931,<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly b<strong>as</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong, Nguyen (Ho) wrote letters to <strong>the</strong> ES us<strong>in</strong>g different pseudonyms.<br />

Once Ho <strong>in</strong>tended to use <strong>the</strong> name of L. M. Wang. 17<br />

From C. F. Yong’s account, Fu Hung-chi (Fu Hung Chu), a Ha<strong>in</strong>anese leader who w<strong>as</strong> <strong>the</strong>n<br />

Chairman of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Malayan</strong> General Seamen’s Union, w<strong>as</strong> promoted to chief of <strong>the</strong> MCP <strong>in</strong> June<br />

1931. Fu w<strong>as</strong> reported to have received some political tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Moscow before obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g those<br />

appo<strong>in</strong>tments. He w<strong>as</strong> dispatched to Shanghai <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> latter part of 1931 on a mission to resume<br />

party contacts with <strong>the</strong> CCP. He returned to Malaya <strong>in</strong> September 1932 but w<strong>as</strong> expelled from <strong>the</strong><br />

MCP for mak<strong>in</strong>g political blunders. 18<br />

Aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> background of <strong>the</strong> Shanghai networks of communications discussed above, it would<br />

appear from <strong>the</strong> letters of Shieng and Wang that:<br />

(1) <strong>The</strong> MCP did not have direct connections with <strong>the</strong> FEB. <strong>The</strong> MCP had to rely on <strong>the</strong><br />

CCP to communicate with <strong>the</strong> latter. Funds and <strong>in</strong>structions were likewise to be<br />

handed through <strong>the</strong> CCP. But <strong>the</strong> connections between <strong>the</strong> FEB and <strong>the</strong> CCP were<br />

not smooth ei<strong>the</strong>r. Thus, MCP representatives, unable to receive funds, lived <strong>in</strong><br />

extreme poverty.<br />

(2) Even one of <strong>the</strong> established members of <strong>the</strong> FEB, Huang Moh Hang (Wong), could<br />

not smoothly communicate with <strong>the</strong> FEB.<br />

(3) As Ho Chi M<strong>in</strong>h occ<strong>as</strong>ionally lived <strong>in</strong> Shanghai and sent letters under various<br />

pseudonyms to <strong>the</strong> FEB, <strong>the</strong>re w<strong>as</strong> a slim possibility that Ho w<strong>as</strong> “Wang Yung Hai”.<br />

But <strong>as</strong> he needed an <strong>in</strong>troduction to <strong>the</strong> FEB and said he w<strong>as</strong> return<strong>in</strong>g to Malaya,<br />

Wang might not have been Ho after all.<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!