28.06.2016 Views

Neuropsychiatric Symptoms of Epilepsy

5qIFB7UWr

5qIFB7UWr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

320<br />

G. Rayner and S.J. Wilson<br />

In the third phase <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation spanning 12–24 months post surgery, patients<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten attempt to reconcile their changed psychological and seizure status. One study<br />

that followed 89 patients for 24 months following ATL revealed two distinct patient<br />

pathways [ 59 ]. The majority <strong>of</strong> patients (58 %) reported good outcomes, characterized<br />

by improved family dynamics, enhanced vocational and social functioning, and<br />

driving by 24 months post surgery. A range <strong>of</strong> trajectories led to these outcomes,<br />

including the experience <strong>of</strong> early postoperative adjustment difficulties. Case<br />

Vignette 2 illustrates the case <strong>of</strong> a young mother who eventually attained a good<br />

outcome from surgery, after overcoming adjustment difficulties and depression in<br />

the early postoperative phase. As in the study by Wilson et al. [ 59 ], resolution <strong>of</strong><br />

early anxiety and vocational change at 12 months were indicators <strong>of</strong> a good outmother<br />

and sister, and significant vocational and social limitations she attributed<br />

to being unable to drive. She was deemed to have features <strong>of</strong> a moderately<br />

severe depression, and at high risk for a further worsening <strong>of</strong> her mood<br />

post surgery. She was commenced on citalopram.<br />

Postsurgery Follow-up . Within a few weeks <strong>of</strong> surgery family members<br />

witnessed a return <strong>of</strong> focal dyscognitive events, albeit at a reduced rate. She<br />

was irregularly compliant with both her antiepileptic and antidepressant medication,<br />

and her mood remained low and variable. While disappointed at one<br />

level by the postoperative events, at the 3-month review N.M. described some<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> “comfort” in the familiarity that she ascribes to her seizures (e.g., a<br />

feeling akin to “finding a child who you have lost at the shops”). She continued<br />

to struggle with the increased expectations others had <strong>of</strong> her. Against a<br />

background <strong>of</strong> disrupted education, limited vocational opportunity, and a<br />

recent failed personal relationship, N.M. was struggling to make future plans.<br />

The situation was complicated by family relationships characterized by high<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> conflict. Despite this she continued to live with her sister, while her<br />

mother lived next door. To direct enquiry, she regarded the surgery as having<br />

been successful by virtue <strong>of</strong> improved seizure control. She was attempting to<br />

make some gains in her level <strong>of</strong> independence but was bitterly resentful <strong>of</strong> the<br />

perceived ongoing overmanagerial behavior <strong>of</strong> others and her failure to be<br />

eligible for a driver’s license. She was counseled at length about the nature<br />

and course <strong>of</strong> postoperative adjustment both for herself and those close to her<br />

and encouraged to seriously reconsider the benefits <strong>of</strong> formal psychological<br />

support, which she declined.<br />

At 29 months post surgery, the clinical picture remains largely unchanged:<br />

ongoing seizures against a background <strong>of</strong> multiple, ongoing psychosocial<br />

stressors, enmeshed relationships, chronic low mood, poor adjustment, limited<br />

coping skills, and variable adherence/disclosure. N.M. has made no real<br />

psychosocial gains.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!