26.06.2016 Views

Miljövänlig , Låg Kostnad, Mindre Känd Vatten Teknik för Framtiden (Sammanfattning på Svenska) / Environmentally Friendly, Low Cost, Less Well Known Water Technology for The Future

Sammanfattning på Svenska: Tillsammans med andra teknikområden, tidigare inte accepterade tekniker, varav en del har använts i stor utsträckning för kommersialiserade applikationer successivt åter bekräftas av traditionella västerländska akademiker. Nästa fas är hur västerländska mainstream media av olika nivåer (från nyheter, vetenskap rapporter, Wikipedia) kommer att uttrycka dessa bekräftelser.

Sammanfattning på Svenska: Tillsammans med andra teknikområden, tidigare inte accepterade tekniker, varav en del har använts i stor utsträckning för kommersialiserade applikationer successivt åter bekräftas av traditionella västerländska akademiker. Nästa fas är hur västerländska mainstream media av olika nivåer (från nyheter, vetenskap rapporter, Wikipedia) kommer att uttrycka dessa bekräftelser.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• 18’Electrolysis Alkaline-Acid mixed: Effect mix of Accepted,<br />

Disputed, Fully rejected by Western Mainstream(WM)<br />

• ■ 18’Electrolysis Alkaline-Acid mixed. Here it covers somewhat unique versions of<br />

standard type water processes that are not necessarily widely used in all situations/<br />

applications.、<br />

WM Accepted effect: S(Coagulation, toxin separation): i -Electrocoagulation: Prior to<br />

WM official acceptance, electrocoagulation had long been demonstrated<br />

effectiveness by "pseudoscientist" or by ex Soviets since 1900s. Past debunking was<br />

based on selective focus on devices produced large sludge vol, needed high use of<br />

electricity, electrode fouling/passivation/deposition build up, per<strong>for</strong>med erratically<br />

etc. This "fact" was exclusively accepted by media, and seemingly unclear exact<br />

mechanics helped their discrediting ef<strong>for</strong>t,<br />

• But after yr 2000 some major acceptance push seemed to have taken place <strong>for</strong> this<br />

disruptive tech by mainstream European groups and their media by actually<br />

somewhat diverged from US/Canada media-industrial groups. <strong>The</strong>n some of effective<br />

version was more or less highlighted & whole tech was officially accepted(Powell<br />

<strong>Water</strong> Recovery, McKay Creek Technologies+), This might have significance that WM<br />

actually is willing to introduce lower cost effective technologies at expense of<br />

existing profitable systems with wide spread consequences. -->> continue<br />

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm<br />

- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!