26.06.2016 Views

Miljövänlig , Låg Kostnad, Mindre Känd Vatten Teknik för Framtiden (Sammanfattning på Svenska) / Environmentally Friendly, Low Cost, Less Well Known Water Technology for The Future

Sammanfattning på Svenska: Tillsammans med andra teknikområden, tidigare inte accepterade tekniker, varav en del har använts i stor utsträckning för kommersialiserade applikationer successivt åter bekräftas av traditionella västerländska akademiker. Nästa fas är hur västerländska mainstream media av olika nivåer (från nyheter, vetenskap rapporter, Wikipedia) kommer att uttrycka dessa bekräftelser.

Sammanfattning på Svenska: Tillsammans med andra teknikområden, tidigare inte accepterade tekniker, varav en del har använts i stor utsträckning för kommersialiserade applikationer successivt åter bekräftas av traditionella västerländska akademiker. Nästa fas är hur västerländska mainstream media av olika nivåer (från nyheter, vetenskap rapporter, Wikipedia) kommer att uttrycka dessa bekräftelser.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• 59’Ferrous Ferric ion water/Ferrate ion: Continued 12<br />

♛ Iron Sulphate Depositing in water 9 RISK FACTOR<br />

• —>> cont: WM Fully rejected effect: S2(bioenhancing): RISK: C- Biggest risk:<br />

• Fair portion of increased fish stock by this tech would go to current food importing or<br />

starved low agri tech nations, where various interlocked group members with<br />

technological & financial stronghold, IMF/WB lending and compulsory economic<br />

restructuring contract(to suit western establishment's control of those nations)etc would<br />

have lot to lose abruptly. This research finds some portion of mainstream interlocked<br />

groups are accommodating gradual low cost technological propagation but official overt<br />

endorsement of this particular tech might cause the loss too suddenly even <strong>for</strong> those<br />

"white hat groups"'s tolerance standard.<br />

• This type of geopolitically risky relative low-tech(eg Coal <strong>Water</strong> Slurry, Various water<br />

based over-unity energy production, Practically free medical effect stronger than<br />

mainstream methods[eg Homeopathic vaccine] <strong>for</strong> majority of chronic disease) might be<br />

better off to be practised quietly without endorsement by "credible" people at this time.<br />

• Temporal win-win scenario: If allowed unofficially, this benefits fish growth operators<br />

& knowledged group of people "who foolishly believe it works" while establishment<br />

can continue to keep food stock etc control world wide with little such tech<br />

deployment, due to most people still only believe in mainstream news approved<br />

tech.<br />

309

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!