Miljövänlig , Låg Kostnad, Mindre Känd Vatten Teknik för Framtiden (Sammanfattning på Svenska) / Environmentally Friendly, Low Cost, Less Well Known Water Technology for The Future

• 26’Electric field, EM pulse: continued 7
• -->>cont: WM media generally Rejected:
Weaker effects & less often claimed: D(Algae/germ stifling as water), E(Detergent water
effect): some type claims to have electrostatic effect causing to charge water
solutes(Maxim-Water jp), M(spray-soak to make food last longer), N(food detergent),
O(remove odor of dairy farm by feeding water to animals), P(Sludge reduction or oder
removal of water), when electroporation effect causes certain undesirable type bacteria
to die vs pulse happens to enhance human favorite bacteria’s activity?- seems there is
different band range frequency between them, most devices are not set up/targeted to
do this but a few apparently have some effects, T(even dyeing, paint production),
• U(stronger cement, ice, paper, gypsum etc), V(faster boiling, alcohol separation, more
heat conductive), W(degassing, deoxygenation), X(Lower redox value), H2(Dewatering
effect): not commercially targeted by weak power device found for this use(see 2’Pulsed
Power, or 42’Electroporation)
• Effect WM Fully rejected: Z(Plant animal grow larger-faster-nutritious, Catalyst to ferment
food, drink, manure),(Sirox Cleantech, Viaqua, Tathastu Services, Aqwatech, Harmonybg
eu +), Remote controlled frequency change & radionic type element combined
targeting agricultural sector(Plant Horizons Technologies), Use of unique low frequency
range(HydroSmart au +),
linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Research, Vancouver, Canada
140