Miljövänlig , Låg Kostnad, Mindre Känd Vatten Teknik för Framtiden (Sammanfattning på Svenska) / Environmentally Friendly, Low Cost, Less Well Known Water Technology for The Future

• 26’Electric field, EM pulse: Effect mix of Accepted, Disputed,
Generally Rejected, Fully rejected by Western Mainstream(WM)
• ■ 26’Electric field, Electromagnetic/Electric field pulse(also see 25'Electrostatic) etc,
treatment; variant frequency electric field affects water crystallization by likely
ionization/excitation of molecule or its bonding. Major pseudoscienzation of this tech
along with Time Variant Magnetic Water Treatment tech at WM media & academia
level until recently, Cost difference of using this tech against chemical/conventional
tech use is large in terms of device, maintenance, man power cost.
• Yet there seems to be significant performance/effectiveness gap between
manufacturers in this tech, due to lack of own standard device test protocol or
industry association: any company can just wrap wires from frequency generator or
magnet around the pipe and present as a product
• Commercially viable effect is at least 75% of case in properly installed std modern
device:, some seems to be over 90%. Unworkability can be due to excess water
temperature, strong external magnetic field presence to hinder effect, water is static
(major issue with magnetic treatment, but does affect electric pulse type also to less
extent), super high hardness-salt content etc, but still some causes are unexplainable
as even those supposedly unworkable situations it works about 1/2 of time.
linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada
134