Miljövänlig , Låg Kostnad, Mindre Känd Vatten Teknik för Framtiden (Sammanfattning på Svenska) / Environmentally Friendly, Low Cost, Less Well Known Water Technology for The Future

• 25’Electrostatic treatment: Effect mix of, Accepted,
Generally Rejected, Fully rejected by (WM)
• ■ 25’Electrostatic treatment(also see 26'Electric Pulse), Here definition is high
voltage “stick” coated with dielectric material inserted in water flow, Often
combined as sub process to amplify main effects(Ener-tec.com, Hkapc Ion Stick+).
In this section other types of electric pulse with similar effects are included.
• WM Accepted effect: H(Oil-water separation) see “H2” below, S(Coagulation,
separation of particle/toxin etc): (Endress+Hauser, FlowMark Water+), metal
flocculant/colloidal particles seeded from electrode etc to alter repulsing static
charge to attraction, fully mainstream electrocoagulation application(induction
might generate microplama). The fact WM media approves this effect which is in
direct relation to next page’s debunked “A: Antiscaling effect” shows its inconsistent
logic applied, Generally expensive mainstream offered effect is mostly media
approved while same mechanics device is debunked when device price is far less,
H2(Dewatering of sludge, oil, masonry etc): widely utilized application of
Electrostatic Desalting/Dewatering at crude oil refining process(Electrostatic
Coalescence)(Cameron, Prosernat+) : causes water in oil to oscillate with
electrostatic and make water droplets acceleratingly larger for easy recovery
linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Research, Vancouver, Canada
131