18.06.2016 Views

Worldwide investments in CLUSTER MUNITIONS

report-worldwide_investments_cluster_munitions-2016

report-worldwide_investments_cluster_munitions-2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ancial Institutions (FIs) <strong>in</strong>clude (major) banks, <strong>in</strong>surance companies, pension funds, sovereign wealth<br />

funds and asset managers from all over the world.<br />

Investments are loans and other forms of credits, underwrit<strong>in</strong>g of share and bond issuances, <strong><strong>in</strong>vestments</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

shares and bonds and other f<strong>in</strong>ancial services. F<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions can <strong>in</strong>vest on their own behalf or for<br />

third parties.<br />

• Research<br />

We consider any k<strong>in</strong>d of f<strong>in</strong>ancial or <strong>in</strong>vestment l<strong>in</strong>k with a cluster munitions producer to be f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

<strong>in</strong>volvement with this producer.<br />

We apply different thresholds to different companies for <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> shares and bonds. Due to the<br />

different sharehold<strong>in</strong>g structure <strong>in</strong> the various companies, XXIV we chose a 0.1% floor limit for the Asian<br />

companies XXV and a 1% limit for the US companies. S<strong>in</strong>ce there are so many shareholders <strong>in</strong> Orbital ATK<br />

and Textron that hold less than 1% of the shares, list<strong>in</strong>g all of them is beyond the scope of this report.<br />

We made a pragmatic choice to apply the abovementioned thresholds.<br />

Research <strong>in</strong>stitute Profundo (the Netherlands) provided a list of f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions derived from stock<br />

exchange fil<strong>in</strong>gs and other publications by f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions and cluster munitions producers, as well<br />

as from commercial databases with <strong>in</strong>formation supplied by f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />

We <strong>in</strong>cluded all credits and underwrit<strong>in</strong>g activities dated after 1 June 2012 for which we found <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

We also <strong>in</strong>cluded data on sharehold<strong>in</strong>gs and bond hold<strong>in</strong>gs available until 8 April 2016, the date Profundo<br />

concluded its research on f<strong>in</strong>ancial l<strong>in</strong>ks to cluster munitions producers.<br />

We def<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>vestor as someone f<strong>in</strong>ancially <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> a cluster munitions producer. The follow<strong>in</strong>g factors<br />

are irrelevant to our def<strong>in</strong>ition:<br />

– The <strong>in</strong>vestor’s importance for the cluster munitions producer;<br />

– The <strong>in</strong>vestment’s importance for the <strong>in</strong>vestor’s portfolio;<br />

– The contribution of cluster munitions production to the company’s total turnover; or<br />

– The cluster munitions producer’s other activities.<br />

We consider them irrelevant, because a f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitution cannot possibly be certa<strong>in</strong> that the f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

services it provides for a company will not be used to produce cluster munitions. It is common for weapons<br />

producers to f<strong>in</strong>ance cluster munitions facilities from general corporate capital. So far, we have never come<br />

across a project <strong>in</strong>tended specifically to f<strong>in</strong>ance cluster munitions facilities.<br />

As we already noted, the list <strong>in</strong> the Hall of Shame is not an exhaustive list of f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions with<br />

<strong><strong>in</strong>vestments</strong> <strong>in</strong> cluster munitions producers. We apply different thresholds to different companies for<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> shares and bonds. S<strong>in</strong>ce the red flag list is not exhaustive, a f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitution could have<br />

<strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> a produc<strong>in</strong>g company not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> our research. There is little or no transparency on what<br />

credits were given to whom. This makes it very hard to f<strong>in</strong>d out whether a f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitution has granted<br />

a loan to a controversial company.<br />

XXIV Asian companies seem to have a few large (local) shareholders and a group of foreign shareholders with less than 1%. That is<br />

why we lowered the threshold for Hanwha and Poongsan. .<br />

XXV The three Ch<strong>in</strong>ese state-owned companies, Ch<strong>in</strong>a Aerospace Science and Industry, Ch<strong>in</strong>a Aerospace Science and Technology<br />

and Nor<strong>in</strong>co are not stock listed companies, so no shareholders of these companies can be found. For Ch<strong>in</strong>a Aerospace Science and<br />

Industry and Ch<strong>in</strong>a Aerospace Science and Technology, there are no bond hold<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>ancial database used for this research and<br />

the bond hold<strong>in</strong>g coverage for Nor<strong>in</strong>co is very limited.<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!