You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
issue 200 June 2016<br />
TE KAHA<br />
<strong>WORK</strong> <strong>UP</strong><br />
<strong>EXERCISE</strong><br />
<strong>TRI</strong> <strong>CRAB</strong><br />
<strong>BATTLE</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>JUTLAND</strong><br />
<strong>REMEMBERED</strong><br />
1<br />
Celebrating the 75 th anniversary of the Royal New Zealand Navy
contents NAVY TODAY ISSUE 200 2016<br />
DIRECTORY<br />
Published to inform, inspire and entertain<br />
serving and former members of the RNZN,<br />
their families and friends and the wider<br />
Navy community.<br />
Navy Today is the official magazine of the<br />
Royal New Zealand Navy. Published by<br />
Defence Public Affairs, Wellington.<br />
Navy Today is now in its nineteenth year<br />
of publication.<br />
Views expressed in Navy Today are not<br />
necessarily those of the RNZN or the NZDF.<br />
Contributions are welcomed, including<br />
stories, photographs and letters. Please<br />
submit stories and letters by email in<br />
Microsoft Word or the body of an email.<br />
Articles up to 500 words welcomed, longer<br />
if required by the subject. Please consult the<br />
editor about long articles. Digital photos<br />
submitted by email also welcomed, at least<br />
500kb preferred.<br />
COPY DEADLINES FOR NT<br />
5PM AS FOLLOWS:<br />
NT 201 July issue<br />
15 June<br />
NT 202 August issue 15 July<br />
NT 203 September issue 26 August<br />
Subject to change.<br />
EDITOR:<br />
DPA Staff<br />
Defence Public Affairs<br />
HQ NZ Defence Force<br />
Private Bag, Wellington, New Zealand<br />
E: DCG.NAVYTODAY@nzdf.mil.nz<br />
DESIGN & LAYOUT:<br />
Defence Public Affairs<br />
PRINT:<br />
As part of a Government multi-agency<br />
initiative the NZDF has changed to a single<br />
provider for all of its Print Services.<br />
This magazine is now printed by Blue Star.<br />
Feedback to rick.derham@nzdf.mil.nz on<br />
the quality of this publication is welcomed.<br />
INQUIRIES TO:<br />
Defence Public Affairs<br />
P: (04) 496 0270 F: (04) 496 0290<br />
Director Defence Public Affairs<br />
P: (04) 496 0299 F: (04) 496 0290<br />
Defence Careers:<br />
P: 0800 1FORCE (0800 136 723)<br />
www.defencecareers.mil.nz<br />
CHANGING ADDRESS?<br />
To join or leave our mailing list,<br />
please contact:<br />
E: navytoday@nzdf.mil.nz<br />
04<br />
15 31<br />
04 TE KAHA <strong>WORK</strong> <strong>UP</strong><br />
06 <strong>TRI</strong> <strong>CRAB</strong><br />
09 200th issue<br />
12 Battle of Jutland<br />
15 Invictus Games<br />
24 SERVICEMAN <strong>REMEMBERED</strong><br />
29 Unconscious Bias<br />
31 Mainland Island Sanctuary<br />
34 Book reviews<br />
cover image:<br />
TE KAHA CREW TRAINING<br />
DURING <strong>WORK</strong> <strong>UP</strong><br />
2
CHIEF <strong>OF</strong> NAVY<br />
Rear Admiral John Martin<br />
yours aye<br />
As this Navy Today goes to print, I am heading to the United<br />
Kingdom to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the Battle<br />
of Jutland. Our Navy’s links with the battle are largely<br />
symbolic, but our nation’s relationship with the battle is strong.<br />
In 1909, there was growing concern about regional security. In an<br />
empire-wide effort to support the fleet of the Royal Navy, New<br />
Zealand provided funds to build a battlecruiser, or cruisers. The<br />
result was HMS NEW ZEALAND.<br />
HMS NEW ZEALAND toured New Zealand in 1913, and just under<br />
half the population of New Zealand came out to inspect her. In true<br />
Kiwi hospitality, gifts were given to the ship; some can be seen in<br />
the Navy Museum today. One, in particular, a piupiu worn by the<br />
Commanding Officer of NEW ZEALAND, has been loaned to the<br />
National Museum of the Royal Navy, for their exhibition on the<br />
Battle of Jutland.<br />
Within a year of the 1913 visit, NEW ZEALAND would form part of<br />
the Grand Fleet Battle Cruiser squadron. The squadron saw service<br />
throughout the war, participating in the three major sea ‘battles’ –<br />
or, more properly, skirmishes between the British Grand Fleet and<br />
the German High Seas Fleet.<br />
While NEW ZEALAND was a Royal Navy ship with a predominantly<br />
Royal Navy ship’s company, New Zealanders served in her. One was<br />
the commander of X Turret, Lieutenant A D Boyle, RN, from Otaio,<br />
South Canterbury. X Turret suffered a direct hit during the Battle of<br />
Jutland. No-one was killed – testimony, many say, to the spiritual<br />
power of the piupiu, which had been gifted to the ship with the<br />
prophesy that no harm would come to her crew if the captain wore<br />
it in battle. No harm ever did. After the war, NEW ZEALAND visited<br />
New Zealand, with the wartime fleet commander and previous First<br />
Sea Lord, Admiral of the Fleet, Lord Jellicoe. Jellicoe became the<br />
Governor General of New Zealand in 1920, until 1924.<br />
Hundreds of our seafaring men served in the Naval Forces of Great<br />
Britain during World War One and many did not come home.<br />
Instead, many of them served at sea, and they died and were buried<br />
at sea. For their relatives, there are no graveyards to be visited;<br />
seldom are there opportunities to parade with dignitaries and mark<br />
their graves. Instead, they rely on us, just as we rely on those who<br />
follow, to understand the very nature of warfare at sea, and mark<br />
their sacrifice in the waters where they died, a long way from home.<br />
At the Battle of Jutland commemorations, the Warrant Officer<br />
of the Navy and I will have the honour of representing you, and<br />
remembering those New Zealand naval personnel who served in<br />
WWI, in general, and at Jutland, in particular.<br />
For me, serving New Zealand in our Navy is an honour. To serve<br />
with honour is a destination as much as a description of how I will<br />
serve. Serving with honour and living this life as an honourable<br />
person is a key tenet of who I am as a man, a husband and father.<br />
And so, when I meet people who have been treated without honour,<br />
who have been left scarred by those who do not serve honourably<br />
— I ask myself, do I want those who do not act with honour in our<br />
Navy? You see, it’s not about doing things right, it’s about doing<br />
the right things. Recent events suggest that I am right, but it’s not<br />
just founded on a legal basis; it’s all about who we are as people<br />
and as naval personnel. Serving with honour is a hallmark of our<br />
contribution to our nation’s security.<br />
yours aye<br />
3
TE KAHA<br />
achieves<br />
DLOC<br />
4
‘Smashing it’<br />
After an intense seven-week readiness training period (also<br />
known as a ‘work up’), HMNZS TE KAHA successfully<br />
achieved her ‘directed level of capability’ (‘DLOC’) at the<br />
end of May.<br />
“This is a significant achievement for TE KAHA and I congratulate<br />
her crew − not only for the result, but also the attitude with which<br />
they tackled and overcame the challenge. Achieving DLOC means<br />
she is ready and able to deploy for warfare-based operations if<br />
required,” said the Royal New Zealand Navy’s Maritime Component<br />
Commander, Commodore Jim Gilmour.<br />
“One of the requirements of the NZDF is to maintain our combat<br />
capabilities across a range of force elements,” he explained. “In this<br />
case, the workup was for an element of the Naval Combat Force,<br />
and specifically, HMNZS TE KAHA. The crew, under the guidance<br />
and mentoring of the Maritime Operational Evaluation Team<br />
(MOET), demonstrated a thirst for knowledge, a drive for constant<br />
improvement and a warfighting attitude. They are well led at all<br />
levels and are operating as a great team.”<br />
The seven-week workup comprised a series of intense training<br />
periods. These prepared the ship to be able to conduct its core<br />
mission: generic warfare-based operations, and sea-control work.<br />
The ship is tested in areas such as warfare, core maritime skills,<br />
aviation, survivability, defence diplomacy, and C4ISR (command,<br />
control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and<br />
reconnaissance).<br />
The work up culminated in a ‘directed readiness evaluation’. This<br />
was conducted by the MOET, who act as mentors early on and then<br />
‘withdraw’ to become assessors. They put the ship through a ‘mini<br />
war’ on 23 and 24 May, to evaluate its capability.<br />
Now that the ship is ready to operate at her directed level of<br />
capability, her next challenge is to achieve ‘task group certification’.<br />
The certification will allow her to participate in the Anzac task<br />
group deploying to Exercise RIMPAC (Rim of the Pacific) around<br />
Hawaii in July.<br />
By AWT Jesse Maiha<br />
Reflecting on the first three weeks of workup − the<br />
firings, damage control exercises, replenishment at<br />
sea, and everything else that the Maritime Operational<br />
Evaluation Team has thrown our way − we’ve shown that<br />
we’re ready to smash the remaining weeks ahead.<br />
The first week seemed about a month long, with long days<br />
getting the weapons prepped and cleaned to fulfil the<br />
goal of “1,000 rounds out of the barrel of the five”. The<br />
“roar of the war-drum”, so to speak, the thunder of the<br />
biggest gun in New Zealand, has been echoing a lot during<br />
the past couple of weeks. Hearing the empty cartridges<br />
smash against the fo’c’s’le as it was fired has made the early<br />
morning wakeups all that more worth it − no straight guard<br />
rails are left behind!<br />
The damage control teams have been getting a proper<br />
workout, putting every situation to the test. The Standing<br />
Sea Emergency Party definitely get a special mention here,<br />
as, quite simply, they have become better and better as the<br />
days have gone by.<br />
Heading into Defence watches meant a lot more<br />
seamanship evolutions, with the evo team going through<br />
their paces with RAS(L)s, light jackstays, boat transfers,<br />
and the boarding team learning the ropes. These all went<br />
as well as expected; the right people led the way and made<br />
sure everything went the way it should.<br />
The workup period evaluation (W<strong>UP</strong>E) was a good test.<br />
Overall, it was a pretty successful day, and I’m stoked<br />
we got the tick in the box. The Maritime Operational<br />
Evaluation Team fired everything they had at us and we<br />
took it in our stride, ensuring the enthusiasm was at a high,<br />
and leaving everything on the table. I, for one, am looking<br />
forward to learning more during the next few weeks and<br />
smashing everything that comes our way, while still getting<br />
more and more rounds out of the barrels.<br />
TE KAHA <strong>WORK</strong> <strong>UP</strong><br />
5
Multinational<br />
EOD exercise: ‘gold’<br />
Sailors from the RNZN Littoral Warfare<br />
Unit recently trained alongside troops<br />
from the US, Australian, Canadian<br />
and Singaporean defence forces in the<br />
biennial Exercise <strong>TRI</strong> <strong>CRAB</strong>.<br />
Above: ADRs Carlos Mita and Kyran Bennett swimming clear after<br />
placing a disposal charge<br />
The three-week exercise focuses on all aspects of Maritime<br />
Explosive Ordnance Disposal (MEOD) training. It was hosted<br />
by the US Navy’s Explosive Ordnance Disposal Mobile Unit 5,<br />
on the US Naval Base in Guam, during May.<br />
It was a great opportunity to improve ‘interoperability’ amongst a<br />
diverse group of EOD technicians, says Lieutenant Simon Marston.<br />
He led the Clearance Diving Group, of the RNZN’s Littoral Warfare<br />
Unit (LWU). They joined units from the US Navy, US Marine Corps,<br />
US Air Force, US Army, Royal Australian Navy, Royal Australian Air<br />
Force, Royal Canadian Navy, and the Singaporean Navy.<br />
“From an operational and capability perspective, the exercise<br />
was gold,” says LT Marston. “The ability to utilise live, underwater<br />
demolition ranges for both drills and tasks cannot be overstated, and<br />
the chance to work with partner nations who have had considerable<br />
exposure to EOD in a tactical environment allowed us to improve<br />
our techniques and procedures, and take a look at new and<br />
emerging technologies and equipment.”<br />
6 Ex Tri Crab
The aim of <strong>TRI</strong> <strong>CRAB</strong> is to strengthen relationships and<br />
interoperability between the participating nations, and to enhance<br />
the participants’ EOD capability.<br />
To achieve this, it focuses on all aspects of EOD tactics, techniques<br />
and procedures, including: Counter Improvised Explosive Device<br />
Disposal (CIEDD); waterborne IEDs; mine countermeasures;<br />
unexploded ordnance and explosive remnants of war response;<br />
weapons handling; chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear<br />
response; clearance diving; and helicopter and small boat insertion<br />
and extraction.<br />
“The greatest benefit of the exercise to the RNZN was the ability to<br />
access maritime ranges and other diverse training facilities, in which<br />
live maritime EOD and demolitions serials could be executed,” says<br />
LT Marston.<br />
The first week consisted of briefs on intelligence, bomb scene<br />
exploitation and case studies, as well as access training on fast rope,<br />
helicopter casting, small boat insertion, rappelling and parachuting.<br />
The second week was a series of US-run training days, concentrating<br />
on every facet of EOD work, including mounted and dismounted,<br />
Maritime Improvised Explosive Device Disposal (MIEDD), helicopterborne<br />
Mine Counter Measures (Pouncer Operations), underwater<br />
demolition serials, underwater improvised explosive device disposal,<br />
suicide boat attack, suicide diver attack, air insertion port clearance<br />
ops, limpet mine disposal, and high-risk port/jetty/hull clearance.<br />
Week three was ‘free play’, with scenarios developed and overseen<br />
by each nation’s ‘White Cell representatives’.<br />
LT Marston says that the exercise was “hugely successful”.<br />
“The team left New Zealand with a determination to contribute and<br />
interact at all levels and were committed to furthering the good<br />
name and reputation of the NZDF. They accomplished this and<br />
more; they constantly impressed with their ‘give it a go’ attitude, and<br />
won over many new friends.<br />
“From a leadership perspective, I am immensely proud to have<br />
been able to lead such a capable team who embraced every facet of<br />
the exercise and will have left a very favourable impression for the<br />
future.”<br />
The exercise first took place in 1996; the participants then were the<br />
US, Australia and Singapore – hence the name ‘Tri’. Crab is the name<br />
of the US EOD insignia.<br />
The exercise runs every two years. On the ‘off’ years, the RNZN<br />
trains with the exercise’s organising unit, US Navy EOD<br />
Mobile Unit 5.<br />
Top Left & Right: PODR Heaslip liaising with US EOD team on task;<br />
conducting a Render Safe Procedure<br />
<strong>TRI</strong> <strong>CRAB</strong><br />
This scenario was based on Maritime Infrastructure<br />
Protection (MIP) overseas during a period of civil unrest.<br />
A diver was challenged by maritime security forces for<br />
accessing a restricted area area. He failed to surrender and was<br />
subsequently shot on the surface before his body sank to the<br />
sea bed. The team were tasked to investigate and recover the<br />
body. The diver was carrying an improvised limpet device which<br />
needed to be rendered safe prior to being remotely lifted and<br />
moved to a safe disposal area, the body being recovered and<br />
processed through the forensic chain.<br />
The team was working hard as the scenarios ran for around five<br />
hours at time in temperatures ranging between 36–40 degrees C.<br />
They are being constantly monitored for fatigue, and fluid levels<br />
were maintained.<br />
Ex Tri Crab<br />
7
RNZN ready for first<br />
command role in RIMPAC<br />
By SLT Kimberley Williams, Flag Aide to CCTF 176<br />
The Rim of the Pacific Exercise, known as RIMPAC, is the world’s<br />
largest international maritime warfare exercise. This year, the<br />
25th RIMPAC, 26 nations will attend the biennial event.<br />
2016 also marks the first year that the RNZN will take a key leadership<br />
position in the exercise, which is hosted by the United States Navy<br />
(USN) Third Fleet.<br />
The Royal New Zealand Navy’s Maritime Component Commander<br />
(MCC), CDRE Jim Gilmour, supported by predominantly New Zealand<br />
staff, will be the ‘Commander Coalition Taskforce 176’ (CTF 176).<br />
CTF 176 is the largest coalition taskforce. The amphibious assault<br />
taskforce comprises 11 ships from six nations, including HMNZS TE<br />
KAHA. Multiple air and land assets, including the US Marine Corps’<br />
3rd Marine Brigade and 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit, as well as<br />
a company from the New Zealand Army, who will deploy in HMAS<br />
CANBERRA, will also be under command. This taskforce will be capable<br />
of projecting power in the maritime, littoral and inlands environments<br />
of Hawaii and Southern California.<br />
CTF 176 will be the lead from on-board USS AMERICA, which is the first<br />
of the America-class amphibious assault ships and the newest edition<br />
to the USN. USS AMERICA, commanded by Captain Wayne Baze,<br />
USN, has been in service since 2014, but RIMPAC will be her first major<br />
tasking. With a complement of over 2,700 personnel, there are more<br />
people on USS AMERICA than in the RNZN Regular Force!<br />
The Commander and staff of the USN Expeditionary Strike Group<br />
(ESG) Three will mentor the RNZN team, assisting them with<br />
understanding the USN systems and operations, and passing on their<br />
knowledge of the vast capabilities under their command. ESGs are<br />
self-contained composite forces, held at short notice to deliver effect<br />
anywhere in the world that can be reached by sea. They combine the<br />
capabilities of the surface ships, submarines, and patrol and attack<br />
aircraft, as well as the embarked amphibious Landing Force.<br />
The first planning conferences were held in 2015. This year, there have<br />
been several trips to the US and Canada to plan and train with our<br />
coalition partners, and finalise details. In March, CCTF 176 attended the<br />
commanders’ conference in Victoria, Canada.<br />
Another five CTF 176 staff spent two weeks in the US. There, they<br />
trained with the USN and US Marine Corps, adapting their knowledge<br />
of amphibious warfare to the US procedures, which will be used in<br />
RIMPAC 16.<br />
The RIMPAC team’s most recent trip was to the final planning<br />
conference and staff exercise in San Diego, in April. After a hectic week<br />
finalising the day-by-day plans for the entire amphibious taskforce, the<br />
RIMPAC staff undertook a week of scenario-based practical command<br />
training, simulating operational events that are likely to occur during<br />
the exercise, or during real-world operations. During the week, threat<br />
levels increased and the team used the assets on USS AMERICA and<br />
the entire amphibious taskforce to control the developing situation.<br />
The week culminated in air and sea landings, to take back a town from<br />
insurgents, who had gained control and were using it as a base, whilst<br />
at the same time warding off threats from enemy ships, patrol boats<br />
and aircraft. CDRE Gilmour proclaimed New Zealand as the winners of<br />
the exercise!<br />
CTF 176 staff will be deployed in USS AMERICA for the execution<br />
of the exercise, from June until August. After months of planning,<br />
the staffs are eagerly anticipating joining USS AMERICA in San<br />
Diego for the transit to Hawaii in mid-June. Stay tuned for exciting<br />
developments, as we get closer to the execution of RIMPAC 16.<br />
Above: During a visit to San Diego for the final planning conference, the<br />
MCC toured USS AMERICA, escorted by the Commanding Officer, CAPT<br />
Baze. Presented with a USS AMERICA ship’s cap, CCTF 176 is prepared to<br />
take command.<br />
Top of page: USS AMERICA<br />
8 RIMPAC PREP
Navy Today<br />
milestone<br />
200<br />
By former editor, CDR Richard Jackson RNZN (Rtd)<br />
The first issue of Navy Today was printed in June 1996, under the editorship of<br />
Jo Bunce, then the Navy’s corporate relations manager. It was a thin magazine –<br />
just 12 pages, with a limited print run of 5000 – but was an immediate hit.<br />
Twenty years ago, the Ministry of Defence produced a quarterly<br />
magazine aimed at defence commentators and government<br />
officials: Defence Quarterly. The RNZN also had its own<br />
periodical, Navy News, which had originated in the 1970s. Navy News<br />
depended on advertising support, and its commercial publisher<br />
would occasionally delay production until sufficient advertising had<br />
been sold. So it soon developed a reputation for being out of date.<br />
In 1996, the technology of communication had yet to explode into<br />
all the channels that are available today. The then Chief of Navy,<br />
Rear Admiral Jack Welch, saw the need for a reliable, up-to-date and<br />
authoritative magazine that would present the Navy’s wide-ranging<br />
activities to the public and to others in Government. Jo Bunce, with<br />
his extensive marketing credentials, developed the idea into tangible<br />
form, and designer Liz Bridgeman created a lively looking magazine.<br />
Back then, the only digital aspect was word processing; photographs<br />
came as hard-copy prints and the printing process depended on<br />
Navy Today – milestone 200<br />
9
Navy Today – milestone 200<br />
filmwork and plates. While Jo oversaw the editorial process and<br />
inspired the ships and units within the Navy to contribute, Liz<br />
oversaw the production. Jo ensured the magazine covered the recent<br />
activities of our ships, and also reflected the Navy’s interaction with<br />
New Zealand communities, as well as the wider naval profession<br />
– through book reviews, history pieces, and commentary on the<br />
international maritime scene.<br />
Navy Today’s success was reflected in an increasing print run and<br />
many requests to get onto the mailing list. Our sailors’ proud<br />
mums and dads wanted their own copies, as did our naval attachés,<br />
who saw the magazine as a useful entrée to the naval staffs of their<br />
host nations.<br />
The completion and delivery of our new Anzac frigates ensured<br />
a wide public interest in the Navy’s activities; by the turn of the<br />
century, Jo had an increasing workload with wider corporate relations<br />
activities. In 2001, he handed over the editor’s role to me: as a former<br />
naval officer, I have a deep interest in our Navy’s history and culture.<br />
For me, it was the perfect job, allowing me to be in close email<br />
contact with our Navy’s people, in ships, shore bases or overseas.<br />
At the same time, the evolution of digital imagery meant that<br />
photographs could be taken in, for example, the Persian Gulf or the<br />
Ross Sea and be sent to my computer the same day.<br />
In 2002, the talented Sarah Courtney joined Naval Staff and became<br />
the magazine’s designer. Her input was vital to Navy Today’s impact<br />
10<br />
Navy Today – milestone 200
ISSUE 200 JUNE 2016<br />
TE KAHA<br />
<strong>EXERCISE</strong><br />
<strong>BATTLE</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>JUTLAND</strong><br />
<strong>WORK</strong> <strong>UP</strong> <strong>TRI</strong> <strong>CRAB</strong><br />
<strong>REMEMBERED</strong><br />
1<br />
CELEBRATING THE 75 TH ANNIVERSARY <strong>OF</strong> THE ROYAL NEW ZEALAND NAVY<br />
Navy Today – milestone 200<br />
as a professional journal. The Navy itself was fully engaged with<br />
ongoing operational deployments – both at sea and ashore – while<br />
Project Protector meant that the Navy’s management and technical<br />
expertise was in demand. Each Chief of Navy fully supported Navy<br />
Today, seeing it as a valuable leadership tool.<br />
By 2011, the design of Navy Today had been moved ‘inhouse’, within<br />
the Defence public relations organisation, and I moved across to Air<br />
Force News. The experienced journalist David McLoughlin came in as<br />
Navy Today’s third editor; he built on the established structure of the<br />
magazine and strengthened the multi-media approach, taking the<br />
Navy’s Facebook page out to a huge audience.<br />
With Issue 200, Navy Today has reached an important milestone.<br />
A hard-copy printed magazine imposes some key disciplines<br />
on contributors and editors alike. The proliferation of digital<br />
channels may be a key element for contemporary public affairs,<br />
but magazines have a degree of permanence and durability that is<br />
still unrivalled. Navy Today can found in public and school libraries,<br />
as well as foreign embassies and even doctors’ or dentists’ waiting<br />
rooms. It reaches a wide audience and has been a key element<br />
in maintaining public awareness of the many ways our Navy<br />
contributes to New Zealand.<br />
Navy Today – milestone 200<br />
11
Battle of Jutland<br />
It is 100 years since the largest naval battle in history: the Battle of Jutland.<br />
The Battle of Jutland – or, as the Germans called it, The Battle<br />
of Skagerrak – raged for over 12 hours, beginning on the<br />
afternoon of 31 May 1916, 80 miles west off the coast of<br />
Jutland, in Denmark.<br />
Jutland was fought by the fleets of the world’s two largest navies,<br />
those of England and Germany. It was the only time that the Royal<br />
Navy’s Grand Fleet and the German High Seas Fleet met in battle<br />
during World War One, and it was to be the last time a major naval<br />
battle would be contested between only two surface fleets.<br />
There were 249 ships involved in the battle – 150 British and 99<br />
German – and over 100,000 men. Of those, one in 10 were killed<br />
or wounded. For many, death was sudden and was on a huge scale.<br />
HMS QUEEN MARY lost 1,266; INDEFATIGABLE, 1,017; INVINCIBLE,<br />
1,026; DEFENCE, 903; BLACK PRINCE, 857; SMS WIESBADEN, 589;<br />
FRAULENLOB, 320. Many of those who did survive the sinkings died<br />
of exposure in the cold waters.<br />
Debate over the outcome still rages on − 100 years after the fleets<br />
returned to their home ports.<br />
What was the legacy of Jutland?<br />
• It was a decisive, pivotal turning point of naval doctrine,<br />
strategy and technology.<br />
• It was the first battle fought against the unseen: due to<br />
the weather, darkness, the Zeppelin or the new threat of<br />
the submarine.<br />
• After failing to annihilate the Grand Fleet, Germany was left<br />
with only one option: to return to unrestricted submarine<br />
warfare, which Britain was unprepared for. In 1917, this nearly<br />
caused Britain’s defeat, but also brought the United States into<br />
the war.<br />
• At Jutland, the dreadnought was redefined, the torpedo and<br />
mine threat unrealised, and gunnery, munitions, ship design,<br />
intelligence and battlefield communications were re-thought.<br />
Notes on Jutland<br />
• Both the commanders-in-chief accompanied the fleet into<br />
action and risked being killed in action.<br />
• Radio was in use, but it was very poor and subject to<br />
interference and loss of signals; signalling was reduced<br />
to flags.<br />
• There was no GPS; the exact positions of ships were<br />
determined mostly by dead reckoning; although a few, like<br />
NEW ZEALAND, had taken an observed position at noon on<br />
the 31st.<br />
• Unlike a modern ship, Jellicoe and Scheer did not have realtime<br />
information on the progress of the battle, such as radar<br />
and airborne reconnaissance, so they had to make tactical<br />
decisions with the fragmented information passed along to<br />
them during the battle.<br />
• This battle showed that there was a lag between the efficiency<br />
of communications equipment and the complexity of handling<br />
a large fleet in battle.<br />
• The lessons and controversies of the Battle of Jutland directly<br />
influenced how the Royal and Commonwealth navies fought in<br />
World War Two, and shaped the ethos of our Navy today.<br />
For a more detailed account of the Battle of Jutland, visit the Royal<br />
New Zealand Navy Museum website, http://navymuseum.co.nz/<br />
worldwar1/battles-operations/battle-of-jutland/. Or open Navy Today<br />
#110, page 21−28.<br />
Timeline<br />
• First phase of the main fleet action, 4.54−6.15pm:<br />
action between the battleships, battlecruisers and<br />
light forces of each fleet, loss of INVINCIBLE.<br />
• Fourth phase of the main fleet<br />
action, 7.45−9.30 – last action in<br />
daylight.<br />
• Battlecruiser action,<br />
3.48−4.54pm: New Zealand’s<br />
first shots of the battle, loss<br />
of the QUEEN MARY and<br />
INDEFATIGABLE.<br />
• Second phase of<br />
the main fleet<br />
action, 6.15−7pm.<br />
• Third phase of the<br />
main fleet action,<br />
7−7.45pm.<br />
• Night action,<br />
9.30pm−3am,<br />
1 June.<br />
• Return to<br />
ports by both<br />
fleets, 1 June.<br />
12 Battle of Jutland
Captain<br />
Alexander Boyle<br />
Lieutenant Alexander David Boyle is the only known New<br />
Zealander to have served at all three major naval battles of World<br />
War One.<br />
CAPT Boyle, from Canterbury, entered the Royal Navy before<br />
World War One and was serving on HMS NEW ZEALAND when war<br />
broke. He stayed with the ship as it participated in the all the major<br />
naval engagements between 1914 and 1918, including the Battles of<br />
Heligoland Bight, Dogger Bank and Jutland.<br />
During the Battle of Jutland, in May 1916, HMS NEW ZEALAND<br />
suffered a number of hits but no serious damage. NEW ZEALAND<br />
survived a direct hit to X- turret, the gun turret Captain Boyle<br />
was in charge of. He was awarded a Mention in Dispatches for his<br />
subsequent actions.<br />
Boyle wrote to his parents after HMS NEW ZEALAND had returned<br />
to port:<br />
• There is not the smallest doubt in my mind that they lost as<br />
many ships as we did and received considerably more damage.<br />
• I am perfectly convinced they will be defeated one day. They<br />
would have been completely that day had the light lasted.<br />
• Their luck at the beginning, with mist and light, gave them the<br />
first advantage. The destroyers who attacked them in the night<br />
swear they saw some sink.<br />
• I do not think the truth will ever be known. NEW ZEALAND<br />
was in the thick of it and came out with hardly a scratch to<br />
ship or person.<br />
• The other ships in the fleet were hit many more times than<br />
we were.<br />
• The sailors say the Maori face we have painted on the central<br />
top saved the ship. If we painted it out now I am sure they<br />
would mutiny. We are not going to try.<br />
• When the enemy fire, you can see the dull red flash of their<br />
guns and then a cluster of dots getting bigger and bigger as<br />
they tear towards you.<br />
• One knows it is no good ducking or getting behind anything,<br />
as the only thing to do is sit still and hope they do not hit you.<br />
It is like somebody throwing heavy stones at you whilst you sit<br />
still in a chair.<br />
He concluded with, “It is a nice little game this war and I will not be<br />
sorry when it is over.”<br />
After World War One, CAPT Boyle left the Royal Navy and returned<br />
to Canterbury. He was the first Commanding Officer of the Naval<br />
Reserve Division, established in Christchurch between the wars.<br />
He was recalled to active service during World War Two, where he<br />
reached the rank of Captain, then returned to his South Canterbury<br />
farm after the war ended. He died in 1965.<br />
Marking Jutland in 2016<br />
The Orkney Islands served as the main base for the Royal Navy<br />
during the First World War, and was the major focal point for the<br />
anniversary ceremony in the UK on 31 May.<br />
On Orkney, a national service of remembrance was held in St<br />
Magnus’ Cathedral. Then proceedings moved to Lyness Royal Navy<br />
Cemetery, overlooking Scapa Flow. The Chief of Navy, Rear Admiral<br />
John Martin, ONZM, attended the ceremony. He presented the<br />
piupiu and objects from the Battle of Jutland, which are on loan to<br />
the RN Museum’s Jutland Exhibition (see page 32).<br />
Commemorations in New Zealand<br />
Sunday, 29 May 2016: Kaiapoi Returned Services Association<br />
held a Battle of Jutland Service at Kaiapoi Cenotaph, supported<br />
by HMNZS Pegasus. It was followed by a wreath-laying<br />
ceremony.<br />
Tuesday, 31 May: A service was held in Devonport, Auckland,<br />
run by the Auckland Council and the National Museum of the<br />
Royal New Zealand Navy.<br />
Also on the 31 May, the Battle of Jutland Exhibition opened<br />
at South Canterbury Museum, in Timaru. The battle flag from<br />
HMS New Zealand is on display in the exhibition.<br />
Battle of Jutland<br />
13
Operation Neptune:<br />
full steam ahead for November<br />
Following the 75th anniversary events featured in our February<br />
update (Naval Base Veteran’s Day, Formation Entry, and<br />
Government House Garden Party) Operation NEPTUNE has<br />
hosted more events and is ramping up preparations for the Women<br />
at Sea celebrations in June and the International Naval Review in<br />
November.<br />
To mark the Navy’s 75th anniversary, Mr Malcolm Taylor of<br />
Ashburton presented a handcrafted model of HMNZS KIWI (T02),<br />
a Bird-class ‘corvette’ commissioned in 1941 that saw service in the<br />
Solomon Islands in 1943. Together with HMNZS MOA, the KIWI<br />
successfully engaged the Japanese submarine I-1 off the coast of<br />
Guadalcanal, ramming her three times and causing the much bigger<br />
submarine to flee until she ran aground. The well-detailed model<br />
took Mr Taylor around 1,400 hours, during a two-year period, to<br />
complete.<br />
Ceremonies at shore and at sea were held to commemorate the 75th<br />
anniversary of HMS PURIRI’s loss on 14 May 1941. HMS PURIRI was<br />
the only warship sunk by enemy action in New Zealand waters. For<br />
more on the ceremony, see page 22 and 23.<br />
Preparations are well underway for the Women at Sea celebrations<br />
this June. The events will be launched with a sea-riding day in<br />
HMNZS WELLINGTON on 18 June, followed by a conference at the<br />
Spencer on Byron Hotel on 23−24 June and a reception on 23 June at<br />
the Auckland War Memorial Museum. We are proud to acknowledge<br />
the previous service of our former naval women, as well as the great<br />
work of our current sailors.<br />
The International Naval Review in November is shaping up to be<br />
a once-in-a-lifetime, spectacular event. A number of foreign and<br />
Commonwealth navies have said that they will be participating. A<br />
street march, a fleet review by Her Excellency the Governor General,<br />
an all-ranks function and a ‘Champion of the Navy’-style sports<br />
tournament are but a few of the activities that are planned for the<br />
celebration. There is certainly plenty of work to do leading up to the<br />
INR from across the Navy but it will be worth it.<br />
The Operation NEPTUNE team has made a real effort to connect our<br />
people with our history. In doing so, we have made some mistakes<br />
which must be acknowledged. On page 48 of the commemorative<br />
publication “Courage, Commitment, Comradeship: 75 Years of the<br />
Royal New Zealand Navy”, there is a photograph captioned HMS<br />
NEW ZEALAND, which is actually the battleship HMS NEPTUNE.<br />
In the order of service for the PURIRI commemorations there is<br />
a photograph of a vessel captioned MV PURIRI, which is in fact<br />
the vessel built after the war to replace the original. We sincerely<br />
apologise for these mistakes and deeply regret any offence that may<br />
have been caused.<br />
Stand by for more pipes!<br />
Above: Mr Malcolm Taylor with the model of the HMNZS KIWI that he<br />
presented to the RNZN on 24 February<br />
14 Operation Neptune
Our Collective Purpose<br />
Left: HRH Prince Harry with<br />
(left) CPO Amy Baynes, who<br />
received two silver medals,<br />
one for the IRB2 Women’s<br />
Road Bike Time Trial and one<br />
for the IRB2 Women’s Road<br />
Bike Circuit.<br />
The power of potential:<br />
Invictus<br />
By Matthew Boulton, Defence Public Affairs<br />
There’s a growing air of excitement as<br />
the team members take their places on<br />
the court. A whistle blows and the ball is<br />
thrown in. Arms reach to take possession<br />
and simultaneously the crowd erupts over<br />
the crash of metal on metal, as opposing<br />
sides hurl themselves at the person they are<br />
marking. Every attempt is made to stop the<br />
other team from being able to manoeuvre<br />
their well-armoured wheelchairs toward the<br />
touch line. It’s an intense game of hard hits<br />
and incredible athleticism; it’s nicknamed<br />
‘murderball’ for good reason, and it’s only<br />
when you watch a triple-amputee move<br />
like lightning through a heavy New Zealand<br />
defence and score the first try of the game<br />
you realise this is a sporting competition<br />
like no other. This is wheelchair rugby at the<br />
Invictus Games − it’s only one of 10 sports<br />
being competed during the four days of<br />
competition − and it’s spectacular.<br />
In 2014, His Royal Highness Prince Harry, along with the Royal<br />
Foundation of the Duchess of Cambridge and the UK Ministry<br />
of Defence, hosted the inaugural Invictus Games − a five-day<br />
adaptive sporting event that brought together injured, wounded and<br />
ill current and ex-serving men and women from around the world.<br />
Its goals: to harness the power of sport to inspire recovery, support<br />
rehabilitation, and generate a wider understanding of, and respect<br />
for, those who serve their country.<br />
In 2014, the New Zealand Defence Force sent 12 athletes from across<br />
all services: representatives of Regular and Reserve Forces, serving<br />
civilians and retired personnel. The team fought hard in London and<br />
brought back six medals for their efforts.<br />
Toward the end of 2015, the call went out again across the NZDF.<br />
A selection camp was held and over the coming months of training,<br />
18 athletes and a handful of support staff found themselves<br />
marching into Champion Stadium at the ESPN Wide World of<br />
Sports Complex in Orlando, Florida, as part of the NZ Defence Force<br />
Invictus Games team.<br />
It would be easy to think that competing at events like the Invictus<br />
Games is less challenging than in non-adaptive sporting events.<br />
Nothing could be further from the truth. The road to Invictus is not<br />
an easy one. For some it means testing their physicality in ways that<br />
it hasn’t been tested before. For others, it’s a test of their mental<br />
strength: stepping outside of their comfort zone. Each would agree<br />
that the end result was worth it.<br />
CPOPTI Miria Paul, one of the team’s team trainers, says she<br />
learned unexpected lessons through the Games. “Preconceptions<br />
I may have had at the beginning of this journey about the limits<br />
I thought athletes might have due to their illness or injury − not<br />
understanding their true potential or capabilities − has changed so<br />
INVICTUS<br />
15
Our Collective Purpose<br />
much. It’s allowed me to become a better trainer, looking outside<br />
the square to find different training solutions for different athletes,”<br />
she says.<br />
During the games, the playing field is levelled through details such<br />
as competitors being matched against people with similar injury,<br />
or by all players competing in wheelchairs in basketball, tennis and<br />
rugby. But the challenge is as big, if not bigger. There are physical<br />
and emotional differences to overcome; perceived weaknesses that<br />
are refocused as strengths. Imagine learning the skills required to<br />
handle a wheelchair when you have never had to use one, while<br />
simultaneously remembering the particular rules of the sport you’re<br />
playing AND keeping a competitive edge.<br />
Beyond the physical rehabilitation that sport can bring, competing<br />
with people who share a similar circumstance or experience offers<br />
a way to enhance good mental health − a huge focus of the 2016<br />
Invictus Games.<br />
“It’s the people,” says POMED Aaron Gibbs, a competitor at the<br />
games. “Everybody has their own journey, but we’re all on the same<br />
road heading for the same place. We all have our stories to share,<br />
and we did. It made it easier,” he said.<br />
While individual sport makes up six of the events throughout the<br />
Invictus Games, team sports such as wheelchair rugby, wheelchair<br />
basketball and wheelchair tennis brought the team together.<br />
“My highlight was playing wheelchair basketball against the Italian<br />
team,” says CPO Bart Couprie. “I was pleased with the way we<br />
performed − the team on the court worked well. It was good to be<br />
able to put all of our training into practice,” he said.<br />
The next Invictus Games will take place in Toronto, Canada, 26−30<br />
September 2017.<br />
Invictus<br />
Out of the night that covers me,<br />
Black as the pit from pole to pole,<br />
I thank whatever gods may be,<br />
For my unconquerable soul.<br />
In the fell clutch of circumstance<br />
I have not winced or cried aloud.<br />
Under the bludgeonings of change<br />
My head is bloody, but unbowed.<br />
Beyond this place of wrath and tears<br />
Looms but the horrors of the shade,<br />
And yet the menace of the years<br />
Finds, and shall find, me afraid.<br />
It matters not how strait the gate,<br />
How charged with punishments the scroll,<br />
I AM the master of my fate:<br />
I AM the captain of my soul.<br />
The Invictus Games was inspired by the words of William<br />
Ernest Henley’s poem. Henley was an amputee and his poem<br />
is testimony to his refusal to let illness disrupt his life. It is<br />
this ode to the unrelenting human spirit that is at the very heart of<br />
the Invictus Games.<br />
The 2016 Invictus Games were an outstanding success. The host<br />
country, the United States, organised a great event. I have never<br />
been in such a place where the atmosphere has been so powerful,<br />
inspiring and humbling, and with many of the athletes openly<br />
telling their stories.<br />
A total of 500 athletes from 14 countries (Afghanistan, Australia,<br />
Canada, Denmark, Estonia, France, Georgia, Germany, Italy, Jordan,<br />
Netherlands, New Zealand, United Kingdom, US) competed in 10<br />
adaptive sporting events.<br />
Left: POMED Aaron Gibbs, following New Zealand’s resounding win against<br />
Australia in wheelchair basketball<br />
16 INVICTUS
Our Collective Purpose<br />
The NZDF Invictus 2016 Team did well; they should all be proud<br />
of their achievements. What the athletes achieved on their own<br />
journeys to achieving a medal, a personal best or making it to the<br />
start line is nothing short of inspirational.<br />
You may see physical scars of what the athletes have endured, but<br />
not the mental scars. Many of the servicemen and women suffer lifechanging<br />
injuries, visible or otherwise, while serving their country.<br />
How do they find the motivation to move on and not be defined by<br />
their injuries? How can they be recognised for their achievements<br />
and not given sympathy?<br />
Using sport as the medium has helped physically, psychologically<br />
and socially with their recovery, as these mediums are the great<br />
denominators.<br />
Like all good sports teams there are also the management, medical<br />
support, trainers and media teams who all need to be acknowledged<br />
for all their hard work, organisation, commitment and support<br />
shown to help the competitors in their journey.<br />
The Navy component of the team comprised CPO Amy Baynes (who<br />
achieved two silver medals in cycling); CPO Bart Couprie; POSCS<br />
Tana Pungatara; POMED Aaron Gibbs; POEWS Karl Shearsby; A/<br />
LWTR Heather Cook and – not forgetting – the all-important trainer<br />
and support person, CPOPTI Miria Paul.<br />
An important element of the success of the Invictus Games is also<br />
the whanau and friends who support the athletes through their<br />
journey; our families are our rock.<br />
By WO Steve Bourke<br />
Top left: CPO Bart Couprie during indoor rowing<br />
Above left: CPO Amy Baynes takes aim<br />
Above right: POSCS Tana Pungatara lays down the challenge in a pre-match<br />
haka against the host USA Wheelchair Rugby team<br />
The Kiwi Team took home nine medals<br />
at Invictus 2016:<br />
Gold<br />
Glenn Barnes (ex-Army): IR2 Men’s One-Minute Rowing<br />
Silver<br />
NZDF medal tally<br />
CPO Amy Baynes (Navy): IRB2 Women’s Road Bike Time Trial<br />
CPO Amy Baynes (Navy): IRB2 Women’s Road Bike Circuit<br />
Glenn Barnes (ex-Army): Wheelchair Tennis<br />
David Sherriff (ex-Air Force): Wheelchair Tennis<br />
Bronze<br />
SGT Gareth Pratt (Army): Men’s 50-Metre Breaststroke ISD<br />
MAJ (Rtd) Josephine Barrett (Army): Women’s 50-Metre<br />
Breaststroke ISC<br />
CPL Kelly Whittle (Army): Women’s Discus Throw IF4<br />
Nu Filo (ex-Army): IR5 Men’s One-Minute Rowing<br />
INVICTUS<br />
17
18 Celebrating our Women
Celebrating our Women<br />
19
Inspiring next<br />
generation of scientists<br />
By Anna Thomas<br />
Around 40 primary school children from South Auckland<br />
recently spent the day in Devonport with some of the<br />
NZDF’s sharpest scientific minds.<br />
The visit was part of the Rongomai Primary School STEM immersion<br />
class, which draws students from Rongomai, Bairds, Dawson and<br />
Opukeke primary schools. STEM stands for science, technology,<br />
engineering and mathematics.<br />
The pilot programme aims to encourage students to learn through<br />
projects that improve their literacy and numeracy skills.<br />
Some of their projects have already gained national attention,<br />
including a test for kauri dieback disease and the testing of mould in<br />
South Auckland homes.<br />
The group’s visit to the Navy focused on the testing of ‘aquabots’<br />
(underwater robots) that they had made in their classroom. A<br />
group of scientists and engineers from DTA was on hand to answer<br />
questions and share their knowledge with the youngsters.<br />
After testing and running exercises with the aquabots in the Navy<br />
pool, the group were given a tour of TE MANA. For some of the<br />
children, it was their first trip over the Auckland Harbour Bridge and,<br />
for most of them, their first time on a Navy ship.<br />
STEM director, Nick Pattison, says the biggest challenge is getting<br />
the children to believe in themselves. “These kids are from some<br />
of the poorest homes in the country and they have so little<br />
opportunity. But they have so much potential, it is a matter of being<br />
able to tap into it.”<br />
He hopes the visit to the Devonport Naval Base and the tour of TE<br />
MANA will inspire some of them to consider the military as a<br />
career option.<br />
“If they can understand science, they can apply it in a variety of<br />
areas, and the military is a great place.”<br />
Nick Pattison says he is particularly interested in empowering girls.<br />
“I really want to show these kids, especially the girls, that joining the<br />
military doesn’t just mean fighting wars. You can get an education<br />
and see the world, and there are so many different roles within the<br />
military to consider, especially within the RNZN.”<br />
All images on this page: South Auckland primary school children<br />
test their ‘aquabots’<br />
20 Community
Seaworthiness<br />
safe, compliant<br />
& effective<br />
By Dennis Pringle and Helen Wright<br />
The technical outputs of the NZDF Maritime Domain must meet<br />
the three essential requirements of seaworthiness: being safe,<br />
compliant and effective.<br />
The purpose of the Technical Seaworthiness Authority (TSwA) is to<br />
assure the NZDF Seaworthiness Authority (SwA, the Chief of Navy)<br />
that these requirements are met. As the TSwA is independent from<br />
Capability and Operations, the reports and advice given are not<br />
influenced by conflicting objectives.<br />
The TSwA’s core function is to provide the SwA with independent<br />
assurance that NZDF vessels, key equipment, and systems used<br />
by maritime force elements comply with the Maritime Regulatory<br />
Baseline (for more on the MRB, see Navy Today #199, page 21). This<br />
means verifying that all policies, processes, procedures, standards,<br />
instructions and SOPs that make up and support the technical aspects<br />
of the MRB are followed.<br />
Some of the TSwA’s other functions include reporting issues that<br />
might affect seaworthiness to the SwA and the Maritime Regulator<br />
(MARREG), communicating seaworthiness-critical technical<br />
regulations to stakeholders, and assisting MARREG in administrating<br />
technical regulatory deviation requests. Processing deviation<br />
requests (RNZN180s) involves evaluating the operational and safety<br />
risks associated with the deviation and considering the adequacy of<br />
proposed risk mitigation strategies.<br />
To deliver their core function, the TSwA conducts assurance activities.<br />
Inspections, audits and reviews assess the adequacy of technical<br />
policy and procedures for compliance with the MRB, and to assess<br />
unit compliance with these policies and procedures.<br />
All NZDF units that contribute to the technical seaworthiness of force<br />
elements are responsible for ensuring compliance with the MRB.<br />
Individual units retain responsibility for internal audit programmes<br />
used to improve and assure regulatory compliance. TSwA assurance<br />
activities do not replace these internal programmes, but identify areas<br />
of non-compliance where corrective and preventative action plans can<br />
be implemented.<br />
Specific assurance activities are undertaken for various reasons, such<br />
as leading up to or subsequent to Seaworthiness Boards, follow up of<br />
earlier assurance activities, or an assessment of adherence to changes<br />
in policies. There is a focus on critical safety aspects. Assurance<br />
activities have been conducted in a number of areas. Some recent<br />
assurance activities conducted include maintenance management:<br />
working at height; ship stability management; explosives handling and<br />
storage; and aviation fuel management.<br />
TSwA has a strategy of continuous improvement, so sharing results,<br />
forwarding advice and providing feedback to units is a vital part of<br />
conducting an assurance activity. Rather than being just an assessor<br />
or enforcer, TSwA can help units improve their own approach to<br />
safety, compliance and effectiveness by providing an external view of<br />
what they are doing and identifying deficiencies or opportunities for<br />
improvement.<br />
One of the first assurance activities conducted was on ‘height safety’,<br />
and a follow-up activity was since carried out. The review found<br />
that force elements had taken on-board previous TSwA direction.<br />
Processes and training have being aligned with updated policies and<br />
new legislative requirements. The activity showed a positive change in<br />
RNZN height safety culture, which was reinforced by the enthusiasm<br />
of the personnel encountered during the review.<br />
TSwA assurance activities are not just about ticking boxes. They<br />
provide evidence of the health of technical administrative and<br />
management systems in the NZDF maritime domain and facilitate<br />
action plans for improving technical seaworthiness.<br />
NZDF SEaworthiness<br />
21
75 th anniversary<br />
of HMS Puriri sinking commemorated<br />
Ceremonies at shore and sea were held to commemorate the<br />
75th anniversary of the sinking of HMS PURIRI − the only<br />
New Zealand naval ship lost to enemy action in New Zealand<br />
waters.<br />
HMS PURIRI was a merchant vessel commissioned into service as<br />
a minesweeper. She sank after striking a mine about eight nautical<br />
miles northeast of Bream Head, Whangarei, on 14 May 1941.<br />
Five of her crew were killed, including the captain, Lieutenant<br />
Douglas Blacklaws, Royal Naval Reserve (New Zealand).<br />
The ceremony ashore began with a dawn service on 14 May. The<br />
service was facilitated by local iwi and supported by the RNZN<br />
Māori Cultural Group, the Littoral Warfare Unit, Commodore John<br />
Campbell and Captain Andrew Watts.<br />
Following this was a general service, involving the Littoral Warfare<br />
Unit, the Whangarei RSA, and representatives of the New Zealand<br />
Merchant Service. Distinguished guests included the Mayor of<br />
Whangarei, local iwi, former naval men and women, and the family<br />
of the PURIRI casualties.<br />
Simultaneously, the ceremony at sea was held on board HMNZS<br />
ROTOITI, where her commanding officer, Lieutenant Adam Flaws,<br />
laid a wreath above the PURIRI wreck, eight nautical miles northeast<br />
off Bream Head, Whangarei.<br />
Chaplain Peter Olds gave a wonderful address in which he spoke<br />
of the enduring significance of the sacrifice of those lost in PURIRI,<br />
and contrasted that with the superficial preoccupation that we see<br />
reflected in today’s mainstream news media. In 1941, the loss of<br />
the PURIRI was front-page news. In 2016, it’s the aftermath of “The<br />
Bachelor”, he said. It is certainly worth thinking about, as we reflect<br />
on our history and those who have gone before us.<br />
The commemoration was particularly meaningful to the relatives of<br />
the PURIRI casualties, including the family of LT Blacklaws RNR(NZ),<br />
the commanding officer of the ill-fated minesweeper who, together<br />
with four others, perished when their ship struck a German mine.<br />
Mrs Sonya Sage (LT Blacklaws’ niece) and her husband Ian said that<br />
they were “deeply grateful that the personal involvement of people<br />
22 HMS PURIRI
“deeply grateful that the personal involvement<br />
of people involved in setting up the memorial<br />
was recognised”<br />
involved in setting up the memorial was recognised”, adding that<br />
“everyone we spoke to was appreciative of the service”. Another<br />
relative commented that “everything was just superb, even down to<br />
the magnificent weather” and that it was “a very special day for us<br />
that will live long in our memories”.<br />
CAPT Watts, Director of Operation Neptune, said the ceremony was<br />
particularly relevant for the Littoral Warfare Unit, which conducts<br />
mine clearance operations in the Pacific Islands.<br />
“A key role of the Navy’s Littoral Warfare Unit is to identify and clear<br />
mines to ensure waterways are safe for the shipping that carries 98<br />
percent of New Zealand’s imports and exports by volume.<br />
“It’s important also to note the role of the Merchant Navy in<br />
sustaining New Zealand’s national life during World War II. This<br />
commemoration highlights that the relationship between the RNZN<br />
and the Merchant Navy is just as important now as it was 75 years<br />
ago,” said CAPT Watts.<br />
NZDF SEaworthiness<br />
23
Fallen<br />
serviceman<br />
remembered<br />
Nine-year-old Brooklyn Oakley listens intently to the names<br />
of veterans being read at an Anzac service, waiting for one<br />
name in particular – that never came.<br />
The name was ‘Denis Scrimgeour’. The Royal New Zealand Air Force<br />
Warrant officer died in 1942, during the fall of Singapore, aged 21.<br />
Brooklyn’s father, Royal New Zealand Navy Commander Brendon<br />
Oakley, was based in Singapore with his family for the past three<br />
years. The family would regularly lay poppies onto the Kiwi graves<br />
in Singapore’s Kranji War Cemetery, and place their personal poppies<br />
on the grave of Denis Scrimgeour.<br />
The children – Lukas (11), Brooklyn and Ruby (twins, 9) – were<br />
‘looking after’ the buried soldiers.<br />
The Kranji War Cemetery records Denis’s hometown as being<br />
Richmond, in the Nelson region, which is also the hometown of CDR<br />
Oakley and his wife Lisa.<br />
So when the Oakley family attended their first Anzac day service in<br />
Richmond this year, Brooklyn listened intently to the Roll of Honour,<br />
for Denis’s name. When it didn’t come, CDR Oakley had to reassure<br />
Brooklyn that Denis was still being looked after.<br />
And now he can. A story in the Nelson Mail, a letter and a few emails<br />
later – and the mystery was solved.<br />
CDR Oakley received a letter from Denise Scrimgeour, the niece of<br />
Denis, and his namesake.<br />
She said that Denis grew up in Golden Bay, rather than Richmond, so<br />
his name was recorded on the cenotaph at Collingwood.<br />
“Mrs Scrimgeour emailed through photos and a link to a<br />
website, which shows the Collingwood cenotaph with WO Denis<br />
Scrimgeour’s name engraved. Therefore, he’s suitably remembered<br />
in Collingwood in Golden Bay, and still within the Nelson region.<br />
This was great to learn,” says CDR Oakley.<br />
“My kids were delighted to see his name on the cenotaph, to<br />
discover that he is remembered in the town where he grew up.”<br />
They were also very interested to hear that his niece had been<br />
named after him.<br />
“When I was born in 1945, he was still officially ‘missing’,” said Mrs<br />
Scrimgeour. “I was named after him.”<br />
Five years later her mother received a letter from the Air<br />
Department, dated May 26, 1950, informing her of the location of<br />
the graves in Malaya, and the re-internment in Kranji Cemetery. The<br />
records state that he died on 4 February, 1942.<br />
The correspondence didn’t stop there.<br />
American military personnel posted to Singapore saw the Nelson<br />
Mail article online, and they contacted CDR Oakley and Lisa through<br />
social media.<br />
“They essentially said, ‘no worries; we’ll look after him’ and visited<br />
Kranji War Cemetery, placing flowers on his grave. That was quite a<br />
touching statement from the US Forces.”<br />
The US military personnel said they would make a tradition of<br />
looking after the graves.<br />
CDR Oakley is amazed how it all came about, and the positive<br />
reaction from people in New Zealand and offshore – all just from<br />
sitting there, reassuring his daughter on Anzac Day morning.<br />
In Memory of<br />
Warrant Officer<br />
Denis Allan Scrimgeour<br />
401783, Royal New Zealand Air Force who died on 04 February 1942 Age 21<br />
Son of Arthur Raymond Scrimgeour, and of Phyllis Scrimgeour (nee Lewis), of Richmond, Nelson, New<br />
Zealand.<br />
Remembered with Honour<br />
Kranji War Cemetery<br />
Above right: Lukas Oakley lays a poppy on the grave of Denis Scrimgeour,<br />
in Singapore<br />
24 OUR PEOPLE
Sailors get ‘head start’<br />
on Canadian frigate<br />
By Sonya Chwyl of the Royal Canadian Navy, Maritime Forces Pacific Public Affairs<br />
Four Royal New Zealand Navy sailors travelled more than<br />
14,000 kilometres to join Royal Canadian Navy (RCN)<br />
sailors in HMCS Ottawa, as part of the Regulus<br />
exchange programme.<br />
They are part of a 30-person contingent sent to work with<br />
the RCN.<br />
Since January, the sailors have adjusted to life aboard a foreign<br />
navy ship, learning where everything is located in the Canadian<br />
frigate, and finding their place within the ship’s crew and culture.<br />
“Everyone has been very welcoming,” said Able Marine<br />
Technician (AMT) Tomi Fataaiki. “It’s a super-friendly atmosphere<br />
and the culture is very similar to back home, so we clicked<br />
straight away.”<br />
The Kiwi sailors perform the same duties as their Canadian<br />
counterparts, Ordinary Seaman Marine Engineers.<br />
“All four New Zealanders have been working diligently alongside<br />
the Canadian crew,” said Lieutenant (Navy) Jeff Benson. “They’re<br />
all fully integrated, and they’re expected and capable of doing all<br />
the tasks of any other Ordinary Seaman Marine Engineer.”<br />
All four have become qualified Engineering Roundsmen. Ordinary<br />
Marine Technician Damon Dick-Carson has also achieved<br />
certification as an Emergency Response Roundsman and AMT<br />
Fataaiki is now a qualified Canadian Patrol Frigate Damage<br />
Control Roundsman.<br />
AMT Fataaiki says the exchange programme has been an<br />
excellent way to kick-start his naval career.<br />
“It’s been exactly what I was hoping for. The knowledge I’ve<br />
gained here will be really useful, because a lot of the same<br />
“It’s a super-friendly<br />
atmosphere and the<br />
culture is very similar to<br />
back home, so we clicked<br />
straight away.”<br />
equipment will be installed on the RNZN’s ships soon. It’s a great<br />
way to get ahead of the game.”<br />
Before they return home at the end of June, the New Zealand<br />
sailors will be qualified to operate all the auxiliary machinery<br />
systems on board Halifax-class frigates, which means they’ll be<br />
capable of working with the RNZN’s upgraded ships as soon as<br />
they complete their own modernisation process.<br />
The Regulus programme was originally conceived during a time<br />
of reduced sailing opportunities, when many Canadian ships were<br />
undergoing upgrades as part of the Halifax-Class Modernisation/<br />
Frigate Life Extension programme. Through Regulus, RCN sailors<br />
could participate in international exchanges with partner navies,<br />
enabling them to keep their skills sharp by working and training<br />
on board foreign vessels. In addition to helping sailors gain<br />
valuable practical knowledge, exchanges to foreign countries<br />
provide exposure to a wide range of diverse cultures.<br />
Above : L-R: New Zealand sailors AMT Vance Bell, AMT Robert<br />
Jackson, AMT Tomi Fataaiki and OMT Damon Dick-Carson work<br />
onboard HMCS Ottawa<br />
OUR PEOPLE<br />
25
Doing the Navy<br />
proud in Gisborne<br />
By Chris White<br />
A platoon of former and serving<br />
members of the New Zealand Navy<br />
paraded through the streets of<br />
Gisborne for Anzac Day 2016.<br />
26 ANZAC DAY IN GISBORNE
Retired gunnery instructors Jack Donnelly and Tony Lewis<br />
organised the Anzac weekend reunion to honour the<br />
Navy’s 75th year anniversary and support the city’s Anzac<br />
commemorations.<br />
“We were once again a ship’s company of many generations,”<br />
said Jack Donnelly, writing to the Gisborne Herald to thank RSA<br />
president Ben Tahuta and his committee for the trust, support and<br />
encouragement they gave the Navy veterans. “I was born and raised<br />
in Gisborne before joining the Navy, and to come home for this<br />
occasion was something very special. ‘He heramana ahau’.”<br />
The organising committee, including the RNO, Gisborne, LTCDR<br />
Tony Pereia, consulted with the RSA on how best to support the<br />
Anzac Day commemorations. They decided that the contingent<br />
would parade in three of Gisborne’s Anzac services: the Dawn<br />
Service, the 28th Maori Battalion memorial ceremony at Te Poho O<br />
Rawiri Marae, and the Civic Parade through the streets of Gisborne.<br />
More than 40 former and serving members of the Navy mustered<br />
and fell in before dawn on Anzac Day morning. The haunting and<br />
dull sound of the trench whistle, blown by Jack Donnelly, blew out<br />
– recollecting the Battle of the Somme in 1916, where it sounded<br />
before soldiers went ‘over the top’ to face the enemy in battle.<br />
Following on from the Dawn Service, the parade reformed outside<br />
the Te Poho O Rawiri Marae and marched onto the marae, ahead<br />
of the 28th Maori Battalion Memorial Service. After the service, a<br />
lovely hangi was served for breakfast in the meeting house. It was<br />
also a time for many songs and speeches.<br />
At the Civic Parade in Gisborne, the RNZN platoon − many wearing<br />
berets − gave three cheers to acknowledge the Anzacs and all men<br />
and women of every war, campaign and conflict. On 25 April 1915,<br />
as boats were lowered, readied and cast off for Anzac Cove, the<br />
sailors on HMS Prince of Wales ‘manned’ the guardrails and gave the<br />
soldiers in the boats three cheers by raising their caps and rotating<br />
them in a clockwise fashion, uttering a very subdued whisper.<br />
Chief Petty Officer Rawiri Barriball had drawn two beautiful taonga,<br />
which were presented to the Te Poho O Rawiri Marae and the<br />
Gisborne RSA from the RNZN. These were very gratefully received<br />
as a memento of Anzac 2016.<br />
The RNZN contingent was granted special permission by the Chief<br />
of Navy to parade the New Zealand White Ensign in Gisborne. A<br />
colour guard of former RNZN personnel paraded the ensign at the<br />
Dawn Service and later proudly led the Anzac Parade through the<br />
streets of Gisborne during the Civic Parade.<br />
The gathering at Gisborne in 2016 was a reunion for many, and an<br />
opportunity to share our common bond, as we marched together in<br />
the footsteps of our ancestors.<br />
ANZAC DAY IN GISBORNE<br />
27
Fostering<br />
The Anzac Spirit<br />
Online<br />
“<br />
Over recent years, there has been a growing interest from<br />
younger New Zealanders in learning more about their<br />
family military history,” says Rear Admiral (Rtd) Jack<br />
Steer. “This support is evident in the growing numbers attending<br />
services on Anzac Day and among those wearing poppies with<br />
pride. Many young New Zealanders are keen to know more about<br />
our war heritage and be connected with that and, through an RSA<br />
membership, where there will be a focus on engaging with our<br />
members online, they can be. It doesn’t matter if you’re 21 or 71<br />
years old – the new National Association enables you to be part of<br />
a force for good in New Zealand, that champions the Anzac spirit<br />
and everything it stands for.” – RADM Jack Steer is the National<br />
Association’s president. He is not able to visit his RSA Club, in<br />
Papanui, Christchurch, very often. So being part of the National<br />
Association “allows me to stay engaged with what I feel is a very<br />
worthwhile movement”.<br />
What is the new ‘National<br />
Association’ of the RSA?<br />
The National Association is an online RSA. Because it is online, all<br />
New Zealanders can join up and support the RSA, regardless of<br />
whether they live near an RSA Club, or have any family or service<br />
connections to the military. It will also allow service personnel<br />
without a permanent address to join and participate in the RSA.<br />
The National Association provides welfare for war veterans and<br />
their families, and assists with remembrance for New Zealand’s<br />
servicemen and women.<br />
How and why did it<br />
come about?<br />
RSA research showed that many people believed them needed to<br />
have served in the military, or have some service connection to join<br />
the RSA.<br />
Also, not everyone wants to join a local club; people want to be able<br />
to engage with their peers online, and that is what prompted the<br />
RSA to set up a National Association.<br />
New Zealanders from around the world can join the new National<br />
Association, via our website, and connect with our cause on an<br />
international scale.<br />
Why should people join?<br />
Everyone with an interest in the Anzac spirit, and the ideals of the<br />
RNZRSA, should join.<br />
Members also gain advice on support and benefits, discounts<br />
through the RSA network, and access to Returned and Services<br />
League (RSL) clubs in Australia. Members will be provided with an<br />
RSA Club Card, granting them exclusive benefits and deals with a<br />
range of quality, trusted brands. The benefits available through the<br />
Club Card are substantial.<br />
How do people sign up?<br />
Visit https://rsa.org.nz/join<br />
28 RSA
Reduce bias and<br />
make better decisions<br />
What is ‘unconscious bias’?<br />
‘Unconscious bias’ is the prejudice that no-one notices because it’s<br />
present everywhere. We might think we are being fair, yet the actions<br />
we take are based on preconceived beliefs, and have an unfair impact<br />
on certain people.<br />
Shortcut thinking<br />
Bias is ‘heuristic’ thinking: a ‘rough and ready’ way to make a decision,<br />
form a judgement, or solve a problem. When we are in a pressured or<br />
emergency situation, and under stress, we often ‘think fast’. Instead<br />
of using a process, and studying the information available, we use<br />
heuristics. We rely on the ‘status quo’, with a bias against anything<br />
new.<br />
Our brain is highly complicated, and capable of very sophisticated<br />
processing. But very arduous tasks, such as adjusting to change<br />
or understanding brand-new data, require significant cognitive<br />
power. Our brain will take shortcuts (heuristics) to save energy for<br />
really important, unavoidable tasks. Sometimes these shortcuts are<br />
effective and necessary, but sometimes they compromise the quality<br />
of our decisions.<br />
The brain needs to filter data; at any one time, 11 million pieces of data<br />
can be ‘picked up’, and yet our brains can only functionally deal with<br />
around 40 at any one time.<br />
Why are you seeing ‘your’ silver<br />
BMW 7-series car everywhere?<br />
For example, you’ve just decided to buy a new silver BMW 7-series<br />
car. You see this type of car everywhere: on the roads, on the internet,<br />
in advertisements. This is not necessarily because there suddenly<br />
are more BMW 7-series cars on the road, or in ads, but because your<br />
unconscious brain is focused on the car, so you pick it up.<br />
Our brain filters the evidence we collect; in general, it supports<br />
our existing point of view and disproves the point of view that we<br />
disagree with.<br />
As a result of these filters, we see, hear, and interpret things<br />
differently than other people might, or we might not even see them at<br />
all. Of those 11 million pieces of information, we see what we want to<br />
see, and we believe that what we see is reality. Seeing is believing, but<br />
believing is seeing!<br />
Only occasionally do we realise how subjective those determinations<br />
are and how much they are affected not by what is in front of us, but<br />
by what we interpret is front of us, filtered through our own lens on<br />
the world.<br />
Why is it important that we<br />
address unconscious bias in<br />
the NZDF?<br />
Some decisions and actions taken in the NZDF are affected by<br />
unconscious bias. This has a negative effect on people and how they<br />
are treated, and on organisational decisions.<br />
Types of bias:<br />
• Stereotyping is making assumptions or judgments about people,<br />
groups or religions or any other characteristics that have become<br />
‘common knowledge’.<br />
• ‘Like me’ bias is a natural bias in favour of people we know well,<br />
and who are like us. We favour them as we think they are like us,<br />
and we assume that we share common attributes, values or traits.<br />
• Selective bias is searching for and focusing on information that<br />
confirms your own views and opinions.<br />
• Judgmental bias is where minority groups are systematically less<br />
well rated for technical or leadership roles, even when they have<br />
the same performance records and qualifications.<br />
• Filtering bias is when you ‘scrutinise’ everything, ignoring<br />
information that doesn’t fit with your beliefs and expectations.<br />
• Backlash bias is when a person behaves in a way that is not<br />
consistent with the stereotype held by the group and the person is<br />
rated less competent because of it.<br />
What you can do about it<br />
Reduce your bias: discover what your biases are, and be conscious of<br />
how they affect your decisions. Challenge the thinking or behaviour<br />
of others. And test yourself. Go to: https://implicit.harvard.edu and<br />
Google workshops https://library.gv.com/unconscious-bias-at-work-<br />
22e698e9b2d#.8s2lral7b<br />
Also, use these tools to reduce opportunities for unconscious bias:<br />
• slow down your thinking: listen, reflect, take notes<br />
• use checklists/use analytical tools; eg, SWAT/ask questions<br />
• run well-structured, inclusive meetings<br />
• question your own assumptions and conclusions<br />
• take rest breaks<br />
• maintain structured and formalised processes<br />
• build rapport<br />
• diversify your ‘go-to’ people<br />
• be interested in people<br />
• be disciplined in allocating projects<br />
• look for similarities and connections<br />
• watch for overconfidence<br />
• introduce a ‘Devil’s advocate/black-hat thinker’<br />
• drop the ‘un’ in unconscious, to make your actions conscious<br />
• acknowledge your own bias<br />
• check what bias you have using the Harvard Business School<br />
implicit association test<br />
• use ‘round robins’ when looking at situations<br />
• use peer/360 review<br />
• seek contrary data<br />
• encourage different points of views<br />
• as a leader, hold others accountable<br />
• identify and change own habits, and<br />
• develop your knowledge of different cultures, religions, lifestyle<br />
preferences.<br />
unconscious bias<br />
29
Connect through<br />
The Hub<br />
What?<br />
The Hub is a collaboration tool for NZDF personnel. It has<br />
features similar to social media; for example, users can ‘like’,<br />
share and comment on other members’ posts, questions or polls.<br />
How?<br />
The Hub is ‘unclassified’, and is accessible via personal laptops<br />
and smart devices. It provides users with access to Defence<br />
Force news, events, announcements and unit training tailored<br />
for you based on your service and unit. Beyond being able<br />
to post and share content, you can create and join groups of<br />
interest or you can create your own.<br />
Who?<br />
The Hub is for current and released NZDF military members and<br />
civilian employees, as well as ‘trusted partners’ of the NZDF.<br />
Did you say mobile?<br />
Once you have logged in and created your profile on a computer,<br />
you can download the mobile application from the Apple Store<br />
or Google Play, allowing you 24/7 access from anywhere around<br />
the world.<br />
Still confused what ‘The Hub’ is?<br />
It’s cool; search the keyword ‘learn’ and select the topic ‘learn’<br />
to see a number of short video clips, including ‘Getting Started’,<br />
‘Chatter’ or ‘Groups’; there are others too, if you’re super keen.<br />
To signup<br />
Visit ‘http://TheHub’ on DIXS or find us under ‘quicklinks’<br />
on the ILP by looking for ‘The Hub’.<br />
Are you on<br />
The Hub?<br />
Visit http://thehub on DIXS<br />
30 mcc THE HUB log
Whangaparaoa’s<br />
mainland island sanctuary<br />
By Anne Lightfoot, Environmental Officer (Northern), Environmental Services, Defence Property Group<br />
In the five years since the NZDF’s Tamaki Leadership Centre<br />
became part of an ‘open sanctuary’, possums, stoats and rats<br />
have been successfully eradicated, protecting the centre’s rare<br />
and at-risk native species.<br />
In 2011, a 1.7km-long, pest-proof fence across the entire width of the<br />
Whangaparaoa Peninsula, from Army Bay to Okoromai Bay, was<br />
built, creating the ‘Shakespear Open Sanctuary’. Of the 500-hectare<br />
enclosed space, NZDF occupies 130 hectares.<br />
The aim of an open sanctuary is to support New Zealand’s native<br />
and endemic species to make their home and breed on the mainland<br />
in a predator-free environment.<br />
The concept for the sanctuary was first proposed by Auckland<br />
Council in 2006. Its position on the mainland, at the end of a<br />
peninsula and with Tiritiri Matangi Island just across the Tiri<br />
Channel, makes it ideal as a pest-free area.<br />
The NZDF had already identified a number of rare and ‘at-risk’<br />
species inhabiting the centre, including the moko skink, Auckland<br />
green gecko and ornate skink, as well as some rare plants, and rare<br />
sea and land bird species.<br />
In 2010, the NZDF signed a Memorandum of Understanding<br />
with the Auckland Council, making a long-term commitment to<br />
maintaining the sanctuary, and helping it become pest free.<br />
Since then, possums, stoats and rats have all been successfully<br />
eradicated from the sanctuary. (Although you might still spot the<br />
odd cat chasing a mouse!) As a result, many birds have naturally<br />
inhabited the sanctuary. Other bird species have also been<br />
introduced, including the pōpokatea (whitehead) in mid-2015 and<br />
the toutouwai (North Island robin) this year. The pukupuku (little<br />
spotted kiwi) will be released in April 2017.<br />
The 9.2-inch battery is one of most suitable locations for these bird<br />
releases. Behind the 100m range, solar-powered speakers broadcast<br />
night-time calls of grey-faced and diving petrels, as well as fluttering<br />
shearwaters. This successful seabird attraction project has been<br />
underway for the past year.<br />
New Zealand native and endemic species face significant challenges<br />
outside the sanctuary fence. However, it is hoped that species from<br />
the sanctuary will migrate to other inland areas and establish their<br />
home, thereby increasing the biodiversity and habitat connection<br />
within Auckland and beyond.<br />
Since the beginning, the Shakespear Open Sanctuary management<br />
has been a collaborative approach between Auckland Council park<br />
rangers and NZDF personnel. Other project partners include other<br />
landowners (YMCA and Watercare), iwi, and the Shakespear Open<br />
Sanctuary Society.<br />
There have also been a number of planting days and conservation<br />
programmes running at the sanctuary, giving local school groups<br />
and other community groups a chance to get their hands dirty.<br />
Much of the monitoring and pest mammal control work at the<br />
sanctuary is undertaken by volunteers and council staff, facilitated<br />
by either council park rangers or by the Shakespear Open Sanctuary<br />
Society. NZDF personnel, including Navy range managers and the<br />
NZDF Defence Property Group Environmental Services, as well<br />
as the Northern Facilities Management contractor, PAE NZ, also<br />
play their part, in the ‘Shakespear Open Sanctuary Society working<br />
group’. The working group manages comprehensive pest plant<br />
control programmes on NZDF land and supports council staff when<br />
they are on NZDF land. The Navy Base Operations Unit also plays<br />
a significant role in an ongoing wilding pine removal programme at<br />
the Tamaki Leadership Centre.<br />
The Shakespear Open Sanctuary’s success can be attributed to<br />
the strong working relationship between stakeholders, and their<br />
respect for one another’s operational requirements. Given the type<br />
of occupants within the sanctuary, it is quite unique compared with<br />
other open sanctuaries around the country!<br />
But, in many ways, NZDF land is ideal for an open sanctuary, given<br />
the limited number of people and domestic animals that enter<br />
Tamaki Leadership Centre’s extensive bush-clad areas.<br />
If you are interested in getting involved with the sanctuary, please<br />
contact Defence Property Group Environmental Services.<br />
Top Left: First fluttering shearwater (and nesting) identified within SOS,<br />
on NZDF land located at Huroa Point (behind the 100m Range). It is very<br />
rare on the mainland<br />
Top right: Pacific gecko, resides on NZDF land<br />
sanctuary<br />
31
Above: David Grinlinton is pictured with syndicate DS Captain Kenneth<br />
Stewart (RCN Ret.)<br />
Officer<br />
graduates in<br />
Canada<br />
Lieutenant Commander David Grinlinton, RNZNVR, graduated<br />
from the Canadian Forces Joint Command Staff and Staff Program<br />
(JCSP) at the Canadian Forces College in Toronto. The two-year<br />
programme of study and exercises involves distance learning and<br />
two residential exercises in Canada. While primarily for officers in<br />
the Canadian Forces, some officers from other nations, including<br />
the US, Australia, New Zealand and NATO, also attended the<br />
programme. The qualification means officers are professionally<br />
staff-qualified to Canadian Forces’ standards.<br />
Jutland artefacts<br />
arrive in UK<br />
The ‘lucky charm’ of HMS NEW ZEALAND – a traditional<br />
flax piupiu worn by the ship’s captain during the Battle of<br />
Jutland – along with its bell hanger, honours board, and the<br />
HMS QUEEN MARY ring bolt – were welcomed into the National<br />
Museum of the Royal Navy in Portsmouth, England, during May.<br />
The artefacts will form part of the Royal Navy’s exhibition, “36<br />
Hours: Jutland 1916, the battle that won the war”, which opened to<br />
the public on 18 May.<br />
Ngati Ranana welcomed the artefacts to the UK with karakia and<br />
waiata. The National Museum of the Royal Navy staff said they<br />
were “blown away” to see the artefacts first hand. In particular, they<br />
noted the ‘presence’ of the piupiu.<br />
The piupiu was gifted to the Commanding Officer of HMS NEW<br />
ZEALAND, Captain Halsey (Royal Navy) by a Maori chief in 1913.<br />
At the time, the chief made three prophecies: that the ship would<br />
be involved in three sea battles, the ship would be hit only once,<br />
and that no one on board would be killed. The chief requested that<br />
Halsey wear the piupiu in battle to protect the ship and crew.<br />
On 28 August 1914, HMS New Zealand went into action in the battle<br />
of Heligoland Bight. Halsey donned the piupiu over his uniform and,<br />
recalling later: “Officers and men who were in the Conning Tower…<br />
were so startled at seeing me in this extraordinary clothing that<br />
they appeared to be quite incapable of carrying on with their very<br />
important personal duties and I had quickly to explain why I was<br />
thus attired.” The ship was not damaged or hit during this action.<br />
Halsey wore the piupiu again at Dogger Bank on 24 January 1915.<br />
Before the action he “got many messages from all over the ship<br />
hoping that the [piupiu] was again going to be worn”. Once more,<br />
although the ship came under heavy fire, it was never hit.<br />
In May 1915, when Halsey was promoted and appointed to another<br />
ship, he passed the piupiu to his successor on HMS NEW ZEALAND,<br />
Captain J. Green. CAPT Green agreed to wear the piupiu into action,<br />
which he did during the Battle of Jutland on 31 May 1916. Again, the<br />
ship came under heavy fire but was hit only once, sustaining minor<br />
damage and no casualties. The piupiu remained on board the ship<br />
until the surrender of the German fleet in 1918.<br />
The piece of ring bolt from HMS QUEEN MARY landed on the<br />
quarterdeck of HMS NEW ZEALAND when QUEEN MARY blew up<br />
during the Battle of Jutland. The battle honours board was made to<br />
mark HMS NEW ZEALAND’s participation at the Battle of Jutland in<br />
May 1916.<br />
32 mcc NEWSlog
Learning from the<br />
maritime industry<br />
By LT Leander Scott-Donelan<br />
CPOMTO Nigel McFadyen and OMTO Jess McShane boarded<br />
MV SOOCHOW in March for an overnight passage from<br />
Auckland to Tauranga.<br />
The passage gave the Maritime Trade Operation personnel,<br />
from HMNZS Ngapona VR, the chance to learn from the Master<br />
and crew, by participating in and observing all aspects of the<br />
vessel’s operation.<br />
The Maritime Trade Operation provides a link between the<br />
RNZN and the civilian maritime industry.<br />
CPOMTO McFadyen focused on obtaining information on the<br />
technical details of MV SOOCHOW. OMTO McShane was able<br />
to shadow bridge watch keepers and, under supervision, was<br />
involved in tasks such as assisting with passage planning and<br />
updating navigational plots using the ship’s radar. They were<br />
also able to introduce and explain the role of the Maritime<br />
Trade Operation to the ship’s Master and officers.<br />
The ship’s company was welcoming and highly cooperative,<br />
which made for a smooth transition into the ship’s routine,<br />
in a very short period of time. The voyage provided a glimpse<br />
into the numerous areas of expertise required to be proficient<br />
on board this type of vessel; indeed, a high degree of<br />
professionalism, ethics and a strong health and safety culture<br />
was demonstrated at all times. The passage was an excellent<br />
opportunity to build relationships with the civilian maritime<br />
industry, and learn from it.<br />
Gearing up<br />
for Census16<br />
Our first ever NZDF engagement survey, known as ‘the<br />
Census’, was launched a year ago.<br />
This year’s Census is fast approaching. In late July, we will be<br />
asking you to complete the Census16 survey. As this is our<br />
full engagement survey, it is longer than the short Pulse16<br />
survey completed in April.<br />
Engagement scores are important because, among other<br />
things, they measure two things of concern to us: the<br />
performance of our leaders and people, and our people’s<br />
wellbeing. These are paramount for everyone who works in<br />
the NZDF, given that we are proud of ‘punching above our<br />
weight’, and also caring for our people.<br />
Census16<br />
WHAT<br />
WHY<br />
WHO<br />
WHEN<br />
HOW<br />
The Census16 survey measures how we’re<br />
performing as a Defence Force. It takes<br />
around 15−20 minutes to complete.<br />
To gather information that will help NZDF<br />
build an even better workplace, improve<br />
the working lives of personnel, and further<br />
increase our ability to provide a Force for NZ.<br />
Census16 is for ALL who work at the NZDF,<br />
including Reserves and those who are<br />
deployed.<br />
Census16 will run in late July for<br />
TWO weeks.<br />
For Regular Force and civilians the survey<br />
will be online and a link will be emailed to all<br />
members/employees. Hard copies will also<br />
be sent out to camps and bases for people<br />
who may not have access to a Defence<br />
computer, including people on an exercise<br />
or those who are deployed. For Reserves,<br />
the survey will be advertised on The Hub<br />
and completed via direct email.<br />
RESULTS<br />
We expect the reports to be made<br />
available for all NZDF personnel in early<br />
September.<br />
our people NEWS<br />
33
Jutland – the<br />
Unfinished Battle: a<br />
Personal History of a<br />
Naval Controversy<br />
By Nicholas Jellicoe<br />
Seaforth Publishing,<br />
UK, 2016<br />
ISBN: 9781848323216<br />
Voices from Jutland:<br />
A Centenary<br />
Commemoration<br />
By Jim Crossley<br />
Pen & Sword Maritime,<br />
UK, 2016<br />
ISBN: 9781473823716<br />
The Hidden Threat;<br />
The Story of Mines and<br />
Minesweeping by the<br />
Royal Navy in World War 1<br />
By Jim Crossley<br />
Pen & Sword Maritime<br />
South Yorkshire, UK<br />
2011<br />
ISBN: 9781848842724<br />
The Jutland Scandal:<br />
The Truth About the<br />
First World War’s<br />
Greatest Sea Battle<br />
By Admiral Bacon, Vice<br />
Admiral Harper<br />
Frontline Books, UK, 2016<br />
ISBN: 9781848329379<br />
Jutland: The Naval Staff<br />
Appreciation<br />
By William Schleihauf<br />
Seaforth Publishing, UK,<br />
2016<br />
ISBN: 9781848323179<br />
Fighting the Great War at<br />
Sea: Strategy, Tactics and<br />
Technology<br />
By Norman Friedman<br />
Seaforth Publishing, UK,<br />
2014<br />
ISBN: 9781848321892<br />
The Great War at sea<br />
– Battle of Jutland remembered<br />
By CDR Richard Jackson RNZN (Rtd)<br />
After the Battle of Jutland, controversy<br />
arose because the Germans (the High<br />
Seas Fleet was the first to reach home)<br />
won the opening propaganda campaign. Then,<br />
immediately after the War, when Beatty was<br />
appointed First Sea Lord, he suppressed the<br />
Admiralty’s assessment of the battle (written by<br />
then Captain John Ernest Troyte Harper, a New<br />
Zealander in the Royal Navy) because it showed<br />
up mistakes that Beatty had made on the day.<br />
Thus, the Royal Navy became split between<br />
Jellicoe loyalists and Beatty supporters.<br />
That split is evident in some of the many books<br />
subsequently written about the battle. But<br />
now, a century on, authors are able to take a<br />
less biased view of the battle. And note that a<br />
website, Jutland1916.com, is well worth a visit.<br />
Admiral Jellicoe’s grandson Nicholas Jellicoe<br />
has written Jutland – The Unfinished Battle: A<br />
Personal History of a Naval Controversy. His book<br />
tells the story of the battle from both British<br />
and German perspectives, based on the latest<br />
research, and sets the context of Germany’s<br />
inevitable naval clash with Britain.<br />
The author then traces the bitter dispute that<br />
became known as the ‘Jutland Controversy’<br />
which ensued in the years after the war; young<br />
Jellicoe is very even-handed in his account. This<br />
book gives an excellent account of the battle,<br />
overall, and is recommended.<br />
Jim Crossley, in Voices From Jutland: A Centenary<br />
Commemoration, examines the strengths<br />
and weaknesses of both navies and identifies<br />
some of the reasons for the disappointing<br />
performance of the Royal Navy in the battle.<br />
Crossley argues that the building of the High<br />
Seas Fleet was a strategic blunder on the part<br />
of the Germans, who could have forced Britain<br />
out of the war completely if they had instead<br />
concentrated on their submarine fleet and on<br />
mine-laying.<br />
The Jutland Scandal: The Truth About the First<br />
World War’s Greatest Sea Battle by Admirals<br />
Bacon and Harper is a fresh presentation of two<br />
books first published in the 1920s. Vice Admiral<br />
Harper wrote his personal account after his<br />
Admiralty-approved analysis was suppressed;<br />
Admiral Bacon wrote his after various London<br />
newspapers and Winston Churchill had sided<br />
with Beatty. Both accounts include useful maps<br />
to illustrate the tactical questions that arose.<br />
This volume is for the specialist wishing to<br />
read more deeply into the battle.<br />
Jutland: The Naval Staff Appreciation was<br />
originally written after Harper’s objective<br />
record was delayed and heavily censored.<br />
The Appreciation was a more ambitious<br />
scheme to write a no-holds-barred critique<br />
of the fleet’s performance for use in training<br />
future officers at the Naval Staff College.<br />
But it was written by two Beatty supporters<br />
with a now-obvious bias. The Naval Staff<br />
Appreciation was eventually deemed too<br />
damaging, and its publication cancelled with<br />
all proof copies ordered to be destroyed.<br />
However, despite the orders, a few copies<br />
survived and, transcribed from one of them,<br />
this long-hidden work is now published, but<br />
with an expert modern commentary and<br />
explanatory notes to put it in proper context.<br />
Norman Friedman is a recognised authority<br />
on the strategic, technical, and tactical<br />
aspects of the maritime environment, and<br />
in Fighting the Great War at Sea: Strategy,<br />
Tactics and Technology, he presents a fresh<br />
perspective of the naval side of WWI. While<br />
the focal point of the war was in northeastern<br />
France, the global impact of the war<br />
arose from its maritime character. Allied<br />
troops reached France by sea, and were<br />
sustained by allied shipping. Both France<br />
and the British needed access to American<br />
industry; when the Germans could not reach<br />
US resources themselves, they deployed<br />
their U-boats to deny that access to the<br />
British.<br />
Friedman takes a fresh look at the ways each<br />
side tried to gain command of the sea in<br />
what proved to be a four-year campaign. He<br />
describes the rapid wartime changes in ship<br />
and weapon technology: mines, torpedoes<br />
and aircraft – and in the way naval warfare<br />
was fought, the tactical practices and<br />
changes to command and control.<br />
As with many of Friedman’s books, the<br />
extensive and informative captions to the<br />
many well-chosen photos are essential<br />
reading, along with the main narrative. This<br />
book is highly recommended.<br />
34<br />
Book reviews
Wellington Returned and Services Association Needs You<br />
The WRSA was established 100 years ago. Since then it has served the<br />
Wellington region’s returned and service people and their families.<br />
The WRSA is financially very stable and currently served by a lot of<br />
dedicated ex service and associated people. To ensure it continues to<br />
provide both social and other support to all service people and their<br />
families fresh blood is needed on their Executive Committee. If you<br />
are interested in continuing the traditions of the Services and RSAs,<br />
that is support to all service people and their families, why don’t you<br />
join? Please contact Ron Turner QSM JO, President WRSA by email at<br />
rjturner@clear.net.nz or by phone at 04 38511910 or 274 478138<br />
Retrospect, a history conference celebrating RNZN’s 75th Anniversary<br />
Hosted by the Navy League of New Zealand (Wellington branch) and<br />
the Maritime Friends of New Zealand.<br />
Where: HMNZS Olphert, 34 Waione Street, Petone, Wellington<br />
When: 18 June 2016, 09:00–17:00<br />
Topics covered: HMS Neptune; HMNZS Leander; hydrography; women<br />
in the RNZN; Wellington Harbour (1939−45); RNZN in the Korean War;<br />
Dido Class Cruisers<br />
Further details: 027 4459 590 or rob.martin@nz.ey.com<br />
Cost: $55, or $30 concession<br />
All Ships Reunion celebrating HMNZS BLACKPOOL 50th Anniversary<br />
and HMNZS ROYALIST 60th Anniversary<br />
This will be held in New Plymouth on the weekend of Friday 15 to<br />
Monday 18 July 2016. Details still to be finalised but application forms<br />
can be applied for now. They will be sent when full programme is<br />
completed. Contact Trevor Wylde, 146A Ngamotu Road, Spotswood,<br />
New Plymouth 4310. Phone/fax (06) 7515595, mobile 0274 844587, email<br />
trevor.cherryl@xtra.co.nz<br />
MAY 1977 Intake 40 year Reunion<br />
Auckland May 26 to 28 2017, venue TBA<br />
All BCTs, WRNZNs, instructors and divisional officers who enlisted in or<br />
were involved with this 1977 intake 40 years ago. Please contact either<br />
Norm Harding georgenormharding@gmail.com<br />
or John Leefe j_leefe@me.com<br />
MAY 1977 Intake 40 year Reunion Auckland May 26 to 28 2017,<br />
venue TBA<br />
All BCTs, WRNZNs, instructors and divisional officers who enlisted in or<br />
were involved with this 1977 intake 40 years ago. Please contact either<br />
Norm Harding georgenormharding@gmail.com or John Leefe j_leefe@<br />
me.com<br />
Royal Naval Engineers' Benevolent Society 2018 celebration<br />
150th Anniversary of the Introduction of Artificers into the Royal Navy<br />
in 1868<br />
We are organising a UK event to celebrate the Introduction of Artificers<br />
into the Royal Navy in 1868. RNZN Artificers welcome. Contact Cliff<br />
Fiander, 33 Goldfinch Road, Melksham, Wiltshire SN12 7FL UK, email<br />
cliff.fiander@mail.com<br />
New Zealand Defence Industry Association (NZDIA) Annual Forum<br />
Where: Viaduct Events Centre, Auckland, New Zealand<br />
Dates: 16-17 November 2016<br />
Theme: Shaping the next 75 years – Investing in New Zealand’s<br />
Future Security<br />
Attending will be senior members of the NZ Defence Force, Ministry<br />
of Defence, Industry, Government and International Delegations. This<br />
year’s forum is timed to coincide with the 75th Anniversary Celebrations<br />
of the Royal New Zealand Navy. Please plan early to attend and be part<br />
of this important event.<br />
Further details: www.nzdia.co.nz<br />
Email: contact@nzdia.co.nz<br />
Selected RNZN<br />
rank abbreviations<br />
RADM: Rear Admiral<br />
CDRE: Commodore<br />
CAPT: Captain<br />
CDR: Commander<br />
LT CDR: Lieutenant Commander<br />
LT: Lieutenant<br />
SLT: Sub Lieutenant<br />
ENS: Ensign<br />
MID: Midshipman<br />
WOCH: Warrant Officer Chef<br />
WOMED: Warrant Officer Medic<br />
CPOWTR: Chief Petty Officer Writer<br />
CPOEWS: Chief Petty Officer Electronic Warfare Specialist<br />
POPTI: Petty Officer Physical Training Instructor<br />
POCSS: Petty Officer Combat System Specialist<br />
LSCS: Leading Seamanship Combat Specialist<br />
LSA: Leading Stores Accountant<br />
LMT (P): Leading Marine Technician (Propulsion)<br />
AMUS: Able Musician<br />
ADR: Able Diver<br />
AHLM: Able Helicopter Load Master<br />
OSTD: Ordinary Steward<br />
OMT (L): Ordinary Marine Technician (Electrical)<br />
OCWS: Ordinary Communications Warfare Specialist<br />
Jackspeak—Navy slang<br />
Adrift: Late for work<br />
Blubber: Cry, the word originates from the whaling days:<br />
globules of fat dripped down the carcass during flensing,<br />
resembling teardrops<br />
Gardening: The process of aerial mine-laying during<br />
World War Two; the aircraft involved were ‘sowing<br />
cucumbers’ into the sea.<br />
Hardly out of the egg: A very inexperienced<br />
individual.<br />
Jetsam: Cargo, stores, equipment, etc, which has been<br />
deliberately thrown overboard (jettisoned) to lighten the<br />
ship in a survival situation, but remains the property of the<br />
owner.<br />
Oppo: A friend in a ship; they are on watch when you are<br />
off. Derives from “opposite number”.<br />
Poet’s day: An alternative name for Friday, derived from<br />
the first letters of ‘piss off early – tomorrow’s Saturday!’<br />
Space cadet: Young officer who thinks he or she is<br />
captain of the universe.<br />
Toybox: The engine room.<br />
Wrinkle: Shortcut<br />
our notices people<br />
35
JUN–AUG 2016<br />
64 King Edward ParadE<br />
dEvonPort<br />
10am to 5Pm, sEvEn days<br />
FrEE admission<br />
Westpac presents<br />
30 years of<br />
Women at Sea<br />
During June 2016, we celebrate the courage,<br />
commitment and comradeship of our past and<br />
current Naval women.<br />
In 1986<br />
10.1%<br />
Women in the Navy<br />
In 2016<br />
22.2%<br />
Women in the Navy<br />
In 1986, the Royal New Zealand<br />
Navy commenced a trial of<br />
women at sea onboard HMNZS<br />
MONOWAI. There were 14 women<br />
that participated; 13 ratings and<br />
one officer. In posting onboard,<br />
they had the opportunity to work<br />
in each department during the<br />
trial. It was the first time that<br />
women posted to sea as part of<br />
the regular crew, albeit on a noncombatant<br />
ship.<br />
In 1989, Navy Order 35/1989<br />
authorised the permanent<br />
employment of women at sea in<br />
the RNZN. All women entering the<br />
RNZN from January 1989 intake<br />
would be required to serve at sea<br />
except those in a limited number<br />
of shore only trades.<br />
Today, women operate onboard<br />
each of the RNZN’s 11 warships,<br />
performing roles from warfare<br />
officer, to electronics technician,<br />
chef to engineer.<br />
Since women have been integrated<br />
within ships crews they now have<br />
the ability to progress through<br />
all trades and ranks within the<br />
service alongside our servicemen.<br />
With greater career options more<br />
women are joining and staying<br />
longer than ever before and better<br />
reflecting the nation we represent.<br />
presentInG partner, OperatIOn neptUne<br />
www.navymuseum.co.nz www.navy.mil.nz www.nznavy75.co.nz<br />
36