11.06.2016 Views

MM

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

can the struggles and conflicts to bring human dignity to the poor and the<br />

“How<br />

even the power politics which oppose institutionalized violence with<br />

oppressed,<br />

be kept within the spiritualframework of the ultimate power of the<br />

counter-violence,<br />

Christ and the ultimate goal of recognition of all people in Christ?”(30)<br />

crucified<br />

him it was important to see that our struggles, even our struggles for justice, have a<br />

For<br />

nature. He quoted the Latin American liberation theologian J. MiguezBonino:<br />

penultimate<br />

of our battles is the final battle. None of our enemies facing us is the final enemy,<br />

“None<br />

ultimate evil. … Similarly, it prevents us from seeing our achievements in absolute<br />

the<br />

He also went back to Beryaev, affirming that “Christians know that social justice<br />

terms”.<br />

not solve all human problems”. For Thomas the key question, so relevant for the<br />

will<br />

in the Nairobi assembly, was: “How can the Church be the visible expression of<br />

debates<br />

double awareness, that of the significance and urgency of all politics of justice, on<br />

this<br />

one hand, and that of the ultimate tragic character and the inescapable relativity of all<br />

the<br />

achievements, on the other?” He wondered how the church can participate in<br />

historical<br />

struggle for justice with this awareness and concluded that “We need a theology of<br />

the<br />

engagement that will help Christians and churches in such participation, a<br />

political<br />

that will clarify the dialectical relation between faith and ideology in the light of<br />

theology<br />

cross and resurrection”.(31)<br />

the<br />

dialectics between the ultimate and the penultimate was developed further by him in<br />

The<br />

reflections on the meaning of cross and resurrection in relation to the human<br />

his<br />

up elements of his early theology, he stressed the need to look at the cross and<br />

Taking<br />

as a revelation of the divine way of addressing dehumanising forces in their<br />

resurrection<br />

manifestations. The crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ has to be<br />

manifold<br />

as one event or movement. Resurrection is not God’s victoryover the cross,<br />

understood<br />

as the victory of God’s way of the cross. “The Cross is the Kingdom of God moving<br />

but<br />

power into the history of mankind, taking control of the powers of this world, bringing<br />

with<br />

men the righteousness of God in which every man becomes a brother for whom Christ<br />

to<br />

died.”(32)<br />

the two dimensions, as described earlier, are coming together from the<br />

Here<br />

of the overwhelming life-giving power of the way of the cross, affirmed by<br />

perspective<br />

in the resurrection. He developed this thinking further from the perspective of the<br />

God<br />

Christ as the first fruits of the new creation.<br />

risen<br />

reading of the letters of St. Paul and the influence of the reflections at the WCC<br />

His<br />

in Uppsala, 1968, especially around the document ‘Renewal in Mission’,<br />

assembly<br />

him to deepen his understanding of the meaning of cross and resurrection for<br />

helped<br />

for human self-understanding.<br />

quest<br />

foundation, the source of judgement, renewal and ultimate fulfilment of the<br />

spiritual<br />

of mankind today for its humanity.”(33)<br />

struggle<br />

self-understanding.<br />

increasingly used the phrase ‘new humanity’ as he articulated inSalvation and<br />

He<br />

“Jesus Christ and the New Humanity offered in Him are presented as the<br />

Humanisation:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!