10.06.2016 Views

eldo_user

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Monte Carlo Analysis<br />

Model-Based Monte Carlo Simulation<br />

When SSD_COMPLEXITY=0, a model is optimized to capture the shape of the output<br />

measures, and is defined as an affine combination of univariate random variables, as<br />

follows:<br />

In the chosen non-linear extension with SSD_COMPLEXITY=1, we assume that the<br />

surrogate function s(.) is represented as a linear combination of basis functions ϕ k (x),<br />

k=0, …, K:<br />

Notes<br />

and the coefficients α 0 , α 1 , …, α K are estimated with a dedicated optimization algorithm.<br />

• After running the Monte Carlo analysis with the SSD method, statistical plots are<br />

available in EZwave. The SSD method tries to provide the same post-analysis features<br />

as standard Monte Carlo. View the outputs in the .mcm file and the additional .mch, .mci,<br />

and .mco files.<br />

The following notes aim at expressing some important facts you have to understand before<br />

using this model-based approach. Some rules that may help you are provided.<br />

• The SSD approach suffers from an issue that is common to many model-based Monte<br />

Carlo Analyses. It is difficult to quantify the error committed on the Statistics obtained<br />

from the variability analysis. The fundamental problem is that we cannot relate the error<br />

estimated during the model-based Monte Carlo analysis to the true uncertainty that<br />

could be obtained by running the Monte Carlo based on SPICE simulations. A specific<br />

methodology has been implemented and tested.<br />

If we translate the popular adage “There's no such thing as a free lunch” to our<br />

variability settings, we want to express the idea that despite the potential CPU speedup<br />

we may obtain, it is impossible to get something for nothing. Using the statistical<br />

concepts of bias and variance, model-based approaches potentially reduce variance of<br />

estimators to zero, but the bias may be large and not controllable. The reason is that the<br />

cost of model evaluation becomes almost negligible with respect to true simulation.<br />

Hence, a very large number of model evaluation is allowed and implies almost zero<br />

variance estimators.<br />

Eldo® User's Manual, 15.3 461

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!