Nanda - 2001 - Rice breeding and genetics research priorities an
Nanda - 2001 - Rice breeding and genetics research priorities an
Nanda - 2001 - Rice breeding and genetics research priorities an
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ABOUT THE BOOK<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> is one of the major cereals of the world <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is the staple for about 2.7<br />
billion people in Asia. Global dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for rice is projected to grow at least<br />
commensurately with the population growth. A 70 percent increase in<br />
supply by the year 2025 will be required to maintain the food-population<br />
bal<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />
The green revolution of the Í960's <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 1970'sin particular in Asia brought<br />
about a signific<strong>an</strong>t Increase in rice production in the irrigated ecology. It<br />
established without doubt the technical feasibility of maintaining rice<br />
production well ahead of the population growth in some of the developed<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> underdeveloped rice growing countries. However this phenomenal<br />
growth in production achieved with the adoption of green revolution<br />
technologies was not without its adverse effects; it has generated<br />
numerous problems r<strong>an</strong>ging from biological to environmental <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> socioeconomic.<br />
Another area of concern is that the rice yield in the rainfed<br />
ecologies has remained stagn<strong>an</strong>t over the years. There is a need for<br />
innovative approaches to enh<strong>an</strong>ce rice production across ,the rice<br />
ecologies to meet future challenges.<br />
This book has sixteen chapters. Scientists of international repute from<br />
International Research Institutes, Universities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Research Foundations<br />
have contributed the chapters in this book. The book enumerates past<br />
achievements, the future prospects <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> possible approaches in the field of<br />
'<strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics'. The book will be of immense use to <strong>research</strong><br />
scientists <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> policy makers.<br />
ISBN 1-57808-086-X
Preface<br />
The International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Food <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Agriculture<br />
Org<strong>an</strong>ization of the United Nations have carried out critical studies <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
projected the future dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> of rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> outlined various approaches to<br />
meet the challenges. I have tried in this publication to compile <strong>research</strong><br />
<strong>priorities</strong> in the field of . <strong>genetics</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>breeding</strong> to enh<strong>an</strong>ce rice<br />
production to meet future challenges.<br />
I am grateful to Drs. G. S. Khush, O. Ito^ S. S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i^ D. Senadhira,<br />
Gloria Cabuslay, Ev<strong>an</strong>gelina Ella, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> R. C. ChaudJhary former global<br />
co-ordinator, INGER of the International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute;<br />
Dr. B. N. Singh from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture;<br />
Dr. H. Ikehashi from the University of Kyoto, Jap<strong>an</strong>; Dr. M. J. Lawrence<br />
from the University of Birmingham, UK; Drs. A. P, K. Reddy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> J. S.<br />
Bentur from the <strong>Rice</strong> Directorate, Hyderabad, India; Drs. S. D. Sharma<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> J. Biswal from M. S. Swaminath<strong>an</strong> Research Foundation, Chennai,<br />
India; Drs. S. R. Dhua <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P. K. Agarwal from the Central <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Institute, Cuttack, India; Dr. K. K, Jena from Mahyco Research<br />
Foundation, India; Dr. R. J. Singh from the University of Illinois, Urb<strong>an</strong>a,<br />
USA; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Prof. Zh<strong>an</strong>g Yu from Huazhong Agricultural University,<br />
Wuh<strong>an</strong>, China for their quick response <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> willingness to contribute<br />
chapters for the book in their field of specialization. The quality of the<br />
book is undoubtedly enriched due to their contributions. My th<strong>an</strong>ks are<br />
due to the Food <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Agriculture Org<strong>an</strong>ization of the United Nations for<br />
the permission accorded to reproduce two chapters namely the Key<br />
Note Address by F.Riveros <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sustainable Integrated <strong>Rice</strong> Production<br />
by Sastry et ah from the Proceedings of the 18th Session of the<br />
International <strong>Rice</strong> Commission.<br />
The inspiration to compile this publication dawned on me during a<br />
visit to Moline, Illinois, USA, in J<strong>an</strong>uary 1997 to welcome my gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
daughter, Ayesha, This publication is therefore dedicated to her, Ayesha,<br />
to cherish her arrival.<br />
I take the opportunity to extend sincere th<strong>an</strong>ks to my wife,<br />
Anupama, my critic as well as source of encouragement. My special
vi<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
th<strong>an</strong>ks go to our children Jeetu, Upas<strong>an</strong>a^ Dolly/ Aruu/ Jolly <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Praha<br />
for their expert assist<strong>an</strong>ce in computer use <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> const<strong>an</strong>t support.<br />
4th J<strong>an</strong>uary 1999<br />
Jata S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong><br />
860/ Colony Lake Drive/<br />
Schaumburg/ IL. 60194<br />
USA
Contents<br />
Preface<br />
Keynote Address of the 18th Session of IRC<br />
F. Riveros<br />
1. <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Perspectives<br />
J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong><br />
2. Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong><br />
J,S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S.S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i<br />
3. Sustainable Integrated <strong>Rice</strong> Production<br />
S.V, Shasfty^ D.V. Tr<strong>an</strong>, V,N. Nguyen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong><br />
4. Drought <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Submergence in <strong>Rice</strong> Production<br />
Osamu Ito, Gloria Cabuslay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ev<strong>an</strong>gelina Ella<br />
5. New Pl<strong>an</strong>t Type of <strong>Rice</strong> for Increasing the Genetic<br />
Yield Potential<br />
Gurdev S. Khush<br />
6. Hybrid Sterility in <strong>Rice</strong>—^Its Genetics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Implication<br />
to Differentiation of Cultivated <strong>Rice</strong><br />
H. Ikehashi<br />
7. A Critical Evaluation of Current Breeding Strategies<br />
M./. Lawrence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D. Senadhira<br />
8. Insect <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Disease Resist<strong>an</strong>ce in <strong>Rice</strong><br />
A.P.K. Reddy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> }.S, Bentur<br />
9. Breeding <strong>Rice</strong> for Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to Diseases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Insect Pests<br />
Ram C. Chaudhary<br />
10. Breeding for Adverse Soil Problems in <strong>Rice</strong><br />
B.N. Singh<br />
11. Molecular Marker-Based Gene Tagging <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Its Impact on <strong>Rice</strong> Improvement<br />
Qifa Zh<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sibin Yu<br />
12. Exploitation of Alien Species in <strong>Rice</strong> Improvement—<br />
Opportunities, Achievements <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Future Challenges<br />
V<br />
1<br />
9<br />
23<br />
53<br />
73<br />
99<br />
109<br />
119<br />
143<br />
165<br />
215<br />
241<br />
269
viii<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
13. Cyto<strong>genetics</strong> of <strong>Rice</strong> 285<br />
RJ. Singh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S, Khush<br />
14. Species of Genus Oryza <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Their Interrelationships 311<br />
S.D. Sharma, S.R. Dhua <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P.K. Agarwal<br />
15. Origin of O. Sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Its Ecotypes 347<br />
S.D. Sharma, Smita Tripathy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jyostnamayee Biswal<br />
Index 371
Keynote Address of the<br />
18th Session of IRC<br />
F. Riveros’^<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> is the staple food of more th<strong>an</strong> half of the world^s population. In<br />
Asia alone^ 90% of the wofld's rice is produced <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> consumed. Most of<br />
the consumers, who depend on rice as their primary food, live in less<br />
developed countries. It is foreseen that the world's population may<br />
exceed 8 billion by 2025 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> will need about 765 million tons of rice, 70%<br />
more th<strong>an</strong> what is consumed today. This increase in rice production<br />
must be achieved through utilization of less l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, less water, fewer<br />
agrochemical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other inputs. It is thus imperative to find ways <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
me<strong>an</strong>s to lift the present yield level, optimize the use of various inputs<br />
such as water <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fertilizer in order to make the rice production efficient,<br />
cost effective, suitable for resource-poor farmers, sustainable <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
environment friendly.<br />
The green revolution of the 1960s <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 1970s brought signific<strong>an</strong>t<br />
increases in rice productivity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice production. In countries where<br />
rice is a staple food, production has increased by <strong>an</strong> average of 70% over<br />
the last 25 years. This has been possible through irrigation, the<br />
popularization of agrochemicals (fertilizers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pesticides), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic<br />
improvement of the rice pl<strong>an</strong>t to enh<strong>an</strong>ce its yield potential <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce to biotic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> abiotic stress. The merits of semidwarf highyielding<br />
varieties (HYVs) such as high-tillering, non-lodging habit,<br />
better interception of solar radiation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> improved harvest index have<br />
contributed to the wide accept<strong>an</strong>ce of the HYVs by farmers in the<br />
tropics. The extensive adoption of HYVs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> improved production<br />
technology were accelerated through favourable government policies;<br />
exp<strong>an</strong>sion of irrigated area; availability of credit facilities; intensive
. XVjiSSSS?.<br />
2 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
extension services; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> availability of agrochemicals, especially<br />
fertilizer. During this period, the seed industry gained: momentum in<br />
m<strong>an</strong>y countries, with increased availability of improved quality seed.<br />
The <strong>research</strong> infrastructures were also strengthened. With time, the<br />
intrinsic m<strong>an</strong>agement-responsive merit of HYVs was recognized.<br />
Cropping intensity was also increased due to the introduction of earlymaturing<br />
photoperiod-inserisitive varieties. However, the wide<br />
adoption of HYVs in place of traditional rice is the main cause of genetic<br />
erosion <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the decline in natural biodiversity.<br />
The green revolution undoubtedly established the technical feasibility<br />
of maintaining rice production well ahead of the population growth<br />
in m<strong>an</strong>y developing countries. Nevertheless, it virtually bypassed the<br />
countries in sub-Sahar<strong>an</strong> Africa, made limited contributions in countries<br />
with poor water control <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> totally failed in areas with problem soils.<br />
Recent observations, however, have shown a fall in gains <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> signs of<br />
stress in intensely cultivated irrigated l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s. In order to meet the everincreasing<br />
dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, about 10 million tons of more rice per year has to be<br />
produced. New technology frontiers need to be explored to increase rice<br />
production in support of food security, especially in low-income fooddeficit<br />
countries (LIFDCs). Environment-friendly socioeconomically<br />
acceptable technologies need to be developed to optimize the efficient<br />
use of water, fertilizers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other inputs, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to ervh<strong>an</strong>ce productivity.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> is grown widely in four ecosystems: irrigated l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, rainfed<br />
lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> deepwater <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tidal swamps. M<strong>an</strong>y factors<br />
determine the relative contribution of each ecosystem to future rice<br />
supplies; for example, production potential <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ch<strong>an</strong>ces for its<br />
enh<strong>an</strong>cement; public <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> private investment in production <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
infrastructure; availability of water, availability <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> price of production<br />
inputs; rate at which irrigated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> areas c<strong>an</strong> be<br />
exp<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ed; actual <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> predicted prices of rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> alternative crops; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>,<br />
of course, the population growth. Irrigated rice constitutes about half<br />
the total harvested area but contributes more th<strong>an</strong> two-thirds of the total<br />
production. Signific<strong>an</strong>t yield increases are expected to be realized in the<br />
years to come from the use of the new pl<strong>an</strong>t type developed by the<br />
International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (IRRI), coupled with improved<br />
resource m<strong>an</strong>agement. The increased production resulting frorn ch<strong>an</strong>ges<br />
in pl<strong>an</strong>t type <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cropping efficiency adds very little to farmer's costs.<br />
Producers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> consumers c<strong>an</strong> share gains. The new pl<strong>an</strong>t type<br />
developed by IRRI has a high harvest index, which was achieved by<br />
increasing p<strong>an</strong>icle size (i.e., more <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bigger grains) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reducing the<br />
number of tillers per hill.
F. Riveros 3<br />
Hybrid rice technology offers yet <strong>an</strong>other me<strong>an</strong>s of increasing<br />
irrigated rice potential. China has been successful in exploiting hybrid<br />
rice potential. Hybrid rice yields on average 15-20% more th<strong>an</strong> the<br />
common improved rice varieties. Recent rice hybrids have increased<br />
yields 30-40% (about 2t ha'^) beyond the limits set by the improved<br />
semidwarf varieties with the use of genetically diverse parental lines;<br />
japónica x indica or jav<strong>an</strong>ica x indica crosses are especially promising,<br />
China <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IRRI have capitalized on this technology. China exp<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ed the<br />
area pl<strong>an</strong>ted to hybrid rice from 9.6 million ha (30%) in 1986 to around<br />
18 million ha (or 54%) in 1993, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> has saved more th<strong>an</strong> 2 million ha of<br />
l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for agricultural diversification. Hybrid rice technology has not,<br />
however, spread to other countries, which is partly due to the high cost<br />
of hybrid seed. Practices to reduce the cost of hybrid seed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to<br />
increase seed yield have been developed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are now being tried in a<br />
number of countries. Exploitation of hybrid rice technology in irrigated<br />
ecosystems in India <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vietnam appears promising in the immediate<br />
future. There is need to improve the grain quality <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> incorporate a high<br />
level of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to insect pests <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> diseases in hybrid rice to make it<br />
widely acceptable in tropical conditions. Use of the two-line method of<br />
hybrid seed, using temperature-sensitive male sterility (TGMS) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
photoperiod-sensitive genetic male sterility (PGMS) may further<br />
expedite the spread of hybrid rice technology to other countries. Biotechnology<br />
may contribute signific<strong>an</strong>tly to enh<strong>an</strong>cing rice production though<br />
incorporation of the apomictic trait in rice, which will allow farmers to<br />
save their own hybrid seed.<br />
Because of intensive cropping, especially in the irrigated lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s<br />
of Asia, growth in rice yield has levelled off <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, in some cases, declined.<br />
This trend needs to be reversed. In addition to the urgency of breaking<br />
the yield barriers, the productivity of other inputs such as water <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
fertilizer must also be increased. With the current irrigated rice<br />
technology, only about 30-50% of the nitrogen fertilizer applied are<br />
actually used by the rice pl<strong>an</strong>t.<br />
In irrigated systems, more th<strong>an</strong> 5000 litres of water are used to<br />
produce 1 kg of rice. There is clearly a need to enh<strong>an</strong>ce the input/output<br />
efficiency of fertilizer, water <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> labour with <strong>an</strong> emphasis on low-cost,<br />
low-input, high-productivity technology. Water is a critical resource in<br />
rice culture. The costs of bringing new areas under irrigation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
rehabilitating the existing systems are high. It is, thus import<strong>an</strong>t to raise<br />
water-use efficiency in rice production systems through appropriate<br />
water control <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> m<strong>an</strong>agement techniques.<br />
Prices of fertilizers have soared. The fertilizer industry is based on<br />
nnn-rpni»wahlp ffos.sil fuell enerev sources <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> serious questions are
4 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
growth that measures up to current <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> future needs. The promotion of<br />
fertilizer also causes misgivingSy although no country c<strong>an</strong> afford to do<br />
away with them. Substitutes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> improvement of their efficiency would<br />
be beneficial. Agronomic practices that synergize with m<strong>an</strong>agement of<br />
soily water, symbiont <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> crop pl<strong>an</strong>ts will have to be employed.<br />
Integrated nutrient m<strong>an</strong>agement systems (INMS), which consist of<br />
improved crop agronomy to increase <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sustain crop production, need<br />
to be empahsized. In the irrigated ecology risk of salinization <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soil<br />
degradation is increasing which needs to be addressed expeditiously.<br />
Pesticides are signific<strong>an</strong>t inputs to rice production. In 1988 alone, US<br />
$ 910 million worth of insecticides were used in rice worldwide.<br />
Integrated pest m<strong>an</strong>agement (IPM) drastically reduces investment in<br />
insecticides. It is environment-friendly <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the risk of health hazards is<br />
reduced. Hence adoption of IPM practices should be encouraged.<br />
Similarly, farmers worldwide spend US $900 million each year on<br />
herbicides to control weeds. Perhaps the expenditure on herbicides<br />
could be decreased through the incorporation of pl<strong>an</strong>t traits such as<br />
competitiveness of rice against weeds, particularly during early crop<br />
establishment of new varieties. Exploring the use of natural pathogens<br />
for biological control, allelopathy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> proper tillage practices needs<br />
greater emphasis to control weeds across all the ecosystems.<br />
In addition, biotechnology has the potential to provide <strong>breeding</strong><br />
speed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> efficiency, genetic specificity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic novelty to rice,<br />
relating to productivity constraints such as diseases, insect pests, abiotic<br />
stresses <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> post-harvest quality. The greatest promise in rice<br />
improvement stems from DNA-marker-based gene identification <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
insertion to create tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic rice. The advent of molecular markers is<br />
expected to modify rice <strong>breeding</strong> drastically, since they enable the<br />
number of basic progenitors to be narrowed down <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> allow the<br />
creation of rice genetic maps.<br />
Collaborative <strong>research</strong> efforts in this new area should be encouraged<br />
to develop rice that is resist<strong>an</strong>t to <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> toler<strong>an</strong>t of major intractable<br />
biotic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> abiotic problems.<br />
Mech<strong>an</strong>ization is relev<strong>an</strong>t in crop intensification <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> labour<br />
enh<strong>an</strong>cement <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is <strong>an</strong> import<strong>an</strong>t component of technological development<br />
for boosting rice production in the years to come. Equipment<br />
needs to be developed to meet the requirements of small farmers, in<br />
particular women farmers, to lessen the drudgery of farm operations. It<br />
should not only be cheap but also fabricated locally so as to generate<br />
rural employment. Technologies or more information on ''value<br />
addition' at the farm or village level is needed to enh<strong>an</strong>ce incomes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>
F. Riveros 5<br />
industry: small-scale rural-based equipment makers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> artis<strong>an</strong>s. They<br />
are flexible^ quick to adopt useful technologies, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> provide local repair<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> backup services to farmers. The necessity of decentralizing the<br />
m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing industry so as to reach the rural community needs to be<br />
stressed, as this would generate rural employment <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> income.<br />
Among the various agricultural production systems, the rice-wheat<br />
cropping systems in Asia are import<strong>an</strong>t both agroecologically <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
socioeconomically.' This is the most extensive cropping system in the<br />
whole world <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is practised on about 23 million ha; almost 10 million<br />
ha are in East Asia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 13 million ha in South Asia. It supports a large<br />
number of subsistence farmers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> has shown remarkable resilience in<br />
productivity growth during the last three decades. However, there is<br />
now a growing concern about the sustainability of the rice-wheat<br />
production system as growth rate is stagnating <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> there is a tendency<br />
towards drop in productivity. There are also problems of degradation of<br />
soil structure; late pl<strong>an</strong>ting of wheat, late tr<strong>an</strong>spl<strong>an</strong>ting of rice,<br />
micronutrient deficiencies, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> increased diseases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pests, especially<br />
weeds. Accordingly, it is felt that rice-<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> wheat-growing countries<br />
must accord priority to raising <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sustaining the productivity of the<br />
region^s most import<strong>an</strong>t production system.<br />
The concept ^thriving with rice' seeks to increase rice production<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yield in irrigated areas. This does not solely address the rice crop,<br />
but the whole production <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> processing system, involving other<br />
agricultural activities relating to rice such as rice-cum-fish <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>imal<br />
husb<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ry. This concept is a four-pronged approach which includes: (i)<br />
improvemerit of economic returns of existing rice production schemes;<br />
(ii) diversification <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> intensification of rice-based farming systems; (iii)<br />
utilisation of the whole pl<strong>an</strong>t biomass of rice; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> (iv) tr<strong>an</strong>sformation of<br />
rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its by-products into value-added products. This approach was<br />
recently introduced in irrigated rice areas in Burkina Faso, Guinea, Mali<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senegal, In these intervention areas the rice yield was signific<strong>an</strong>tly<br />
raised <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rural employment was generated through development of<br />
small farm equipment <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> non-agricultural services. This concept needs<br />
to be popularized in areas where the effects of the erstwhile green<br />
revolution are not realized.<br />
The less favourable environments such as unfavourable rainfed<br />
lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s, upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> deepwater <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tidal wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s produce 20-25%<br />
of the world's rice. In the next two decades, they must sustain m<strong>an</strong>y<br />
million farmers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> consumers who, so far, have few of the benefits of<br />
adv<strong>an</strong>ced rice technology. The rainfed rice ecosystems share one major<br />
characteristic: <strong>an</strong> uncertain moisture supply. This uncertainty is the
6 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
to risk could be minimized by making cultivais available, more stable<br />
yields <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> increase in productivity of resources. One way to improve<br />
the well-being of rice-farming families in the rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s is to<br />
intensify the system by adding <strong>an</strong>other crop such as a coarse grain or<br />
foodgrain legume before <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> after rice, wherever this is possible.<br />
Inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> swamps have great potential in sub-Sahara Africa. About 138<br />
million ha of these wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s remain untapped in tropical Africa. About<br />
1.7 million ha are cultivated with either rainfed or irrigated rice. It is<br />
estimated that between 10 to 20 million ha of inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> swamps are located<br />
in West Africa. Emphasis on swampl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> development is a sound<br />
approach for agricultural exploitation. Swamp rice farming is more<br />
stable <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> productive th<strong>an</strong> upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>. In developed swamps, more th<strong>an</strong><br />
one crop of rice or multiple crops c<strong>an</strong> be grown depending on water<br />
availability, <strong>Rice</strong> yield c<strong>an</strong> be subst<strong>an</strong>tially increased with appropriate<br />
technology. Recent experience has demonstrated that inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> swamps<br />
c<strong>an</strong> be productive even with small-scale developments, since investment<br />
in irrigation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> drainage structures <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> m<strong>an</strong>agement is minimal.<br />
Centres of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural<br />
Research (CGIAR) as well as the National Agricultural Research Stations<br />
(NARS) have made contributions to boosting yields under relatively<br />
favourable conditions. Some progress has been made in improved<br />
farming practices for crop establishment, nutrient m<strong>an</strong>agement, onfarm<br />
water collection <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> weed control. However, more efforts-are<br />
needed to address problems with drought, flooding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soil under less<br />
favourable inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> valley swamp conditions.<br />
About 18 million ha of potential deepwater <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tidal wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s in<br />
South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> South-East Asia are not utilized. Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Latin America<br />
also have large areas of unused deepwater <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tidal wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s. The<br />
contribution of these areas could be enormous if constraints such as<br />
excess water, salinity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hazards to hum<strong>an</strong> health could be overcome.<br />
At present, deepwater rice is grown on 11% of the cultivated l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>,<br />
which corresponds to about 16 million ha.<br />
Large areas of floodplains <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> m<strong>an</strong>groves have been converted to<br />
agricultural l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>. Cultivation of deepwater rice will remain <strong>an</strong><br />
import<strong>an</strong>t component in food production by rural people in the densely<br />
populated floodplains <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> deltas of South-East Asia. Development of<br />
wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ecosystems such as m<strong>an</strong>groves <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> floodplains should not be<br />
limited to the growing of rice, but integrated with other l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>-use<br />
systems, including agriculture, agroforestry, wildlife m<strong>an</strong>agement,<br />
game r<strong>an</strong>ching <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ecotourism. The possibility of hsh culture integrated<br />
with deepwater rice cultivars grown in water more th<strong>an</strong> 50 cm deep for<br />
at least one month during the growing season has to be explored. Every<br />
---
F. Riveros 7<br />
culture technologies <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to encourage farmers to adopt such<br />
technologies.<br />
About 19 million ha of rice lie in the upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s of Asia, Africa, Latin<br />
America <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Caribbe<strong>an</strong>. The <strong>an</strong>nual 20 million tons of production<br />
support millions of people, most of whom live at subsistence level. The<br />
upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s are diverse <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> usually have poor or degraded soils.<br />
Topography r<strong>an</strong>ges from sloping terraces to well-drained flatl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
yields average 1 1 ha“^or less. Upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> farmers are the poorest among the<br />
world's rice farmers. 'Slash <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Burn' agriculture leads to serious soil<br />
erosion <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> degradation. This is further aggravated by shortening of the<br />
fallow periods.<br />
Serious efforts are needed in the upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ecosystem to arrest further<br />
degradation of soil through diversification of rice-based cropping<br />
systems. Mixed cropping of upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pasture crops, for example,<br />
has proven to be import<strong>an</strong>t for renovation of degraded pastures of<br />
sav<strong>an</strong>na in Latin America. The conservation of natural resources with<br />
focus on the mainten<strong>an</strong>ce of soil <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> water conservation should be the<br />
major objective in this agrbecology.<br />
The United Nations Conference on Environment <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Development<br />
(UNCED) showed increasing concern about greenhouse emissions <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
the conservation of biodiversity. Meth<strong>an</strong>e is <strong>an</strong> import<strong>an</strong>t greenhouse<br />
gas: the concentration of meth<strong>an</strong>e in the atmosphere is currently<br />
increasing at the rate of about 1% per year. Flooded rice fields are <strong>an</strong><br />
import<strong>an</strong>t source of meth<strong>an</strong>e on a global scale, contributing<br />
approximately 25% of the total atmospheric emission, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mitigation<br />
technologies are required to stabilize atmospheric meth<strong>an</strong>e<br />
concentration in the long term. Possible mitigation technologies include<br />
reducing inputs of easily degradable carbon; increasing soil <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>tmediated<br />
meth<strong>an</strong>e oxidation; reducing emission pathways through the<br />
selection <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>breeding</strong> of rice cultivars; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> preventing or reducing<br />
meth<strong>an</strong>e formation through intermittent aeration, sources <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mode of<br />
fertilizer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the application of chemical inhibitors.<br />
The development, adoption <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> impact of agricultural technologies<br />
are not simply the business of scientists <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> farmers; they are indeed a<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sect of the socioeconomic domain of a political system wherein<br />
those who support <strong>research</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> development (R & D) as well as those<br />
who benefit from it have a vested interest. An integrated approach to the<br />
rice production system is m<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>atory.<br />
In December 1993, the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations<br />
came to a successful conclusion. For agriculture, the basic aim of<br />
the Uruguay Round was to provide subst<strong>an</strong>tial progressive reductions<br />
in agricultural support <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> protection over <strong>an</strong> agreed period of time in<br />
_________ 1. _____1 _____ ] ______
1<br />
8 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
agricultural markets. Overall the world rice market is likely to benefit<br />
from the agreement. <strong>Rice</strong> quality will be given more serious<br />
consideration in future.<br />
The race between the dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> production has so far<br />
been evenly matched. We have not lost the race but the paradox still<br />
exists. Millions of people still go hungry due to lack of access of food or<br />
deficiencies in food distribution systems. The global population is<br />
exp<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing each year at <strong>an</strong> alarming rate. More people must be fed with<br />
food produced on less <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> less l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> with less water <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> less labour.<br />
The challenge for the future is tremendous: the dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for rice must<br />
match with the population explosion <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more rice must be produced<br />
by increasing the productivity of l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> through environment-friendly<br />
technology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> optimum resource m<strong>an</strong>agement. There is need to<br />
diversify rice-based farming system to generate employment <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> moré<br />
income for the poor farming community so as to arrest their migration<br />
to urb<strong>an</strong> areas. Apart from increasing the rice production, the major<br />
thrust should also be to conserve the natural resources, soil <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> water as<br />
well as biodiversity. Future generations should not pay a price for our<br />
present exploitation of nature's endowments. The goal should be: 'Let<br />
there be food for everyone. Let us strive to reduce hunger'.
<strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics:<br />
Research Perspectives<br />
J. S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong>*<br />
THE CHALLENGE<br />
The United Nation's recent population projections indicate that each<br />
year almost 80 million people are likely to be added to the world's<br />
population during the next quarter century. The world population<br />
would increase by 35%, from 5,69 billion in 1995 to 7.67 billion by 2020.<br />
The population increase will be more th<strong>an</strong> 95% in developing countries,<br />
whose share of global population is projected to increase from 79% in<br />
1995 to 84% in 2020. Over this period, the absolute population increase<br />
will be highest in Asia, but the relative increase will be greatest in sub-<br />
Sahar<strong>an</strong> Africa, where the population is expected to almost double<br />
(Pinstrup Andersen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ya-Lorch, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rosegr<strong>an</strong>t 1997).<br />
Dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for food depends on the population growth, its movement,<br />
income levels, economic growth, hum<strong>an</strong> resource development, life<br />
styles <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> preferences. Urb<strong>an</strong>ization will contribute to ch<strong>an</strong>ges in the<br />
types of food dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ed. The urb<strong>an</strong> population in the developing world<br />
is projected to double over the next quarter century to 3.6 billion . This<br />
will profoundly affect the dietary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> food dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pattern because of<br />
the increasing opportunity cost of women's time, ch<strong>an</strong>ges in food<br />
preferences, ch<strong>an</strong>ging life styles, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ch<strong>an</strong>ges in relative prices<br />
* Former <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics Specialist, Guy/91/001, FAO of the United Nations,<br />
Rome; Consult<strong>an</strong>t, Palashoaili, Bhub<strong>an</strong>eswar. Oriasa. Tnriia.
The magnitude in growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for rice will require new <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
challenging <strong>research</strong> approaches to meet the food needs. <strong>Rice</strong> is grown<br />
under four eco-systems, broadly defined on the basis of water regime:<br />
irrigated, rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> flood prone. These four ecologies<br />
account for 76,17, 4 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 3% of the current rice production respectively.<br />
In order to raise the current level of production, Scobie et ah ( FAO, 1993)<br />
suggested three areas which were to be sharply focused.<br />
> Raising the yield frontier of rice which has not increased since IR8<br />
was released.<br />
> Sustaining the current yields, particularly of the intensive<br />
irrigated systems which have shown accumulative stresses <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
decline in yield.<br />
> Closing the gap between potential yields <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> those achieved in<br />
farming systems, particularly in the rainfed systems.<br />
It is estimated that of the extra output of rice required by the year<br />
2030,91.3% will be needed in Asia. Of that increase, 70% will have to be<br />
10 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
associated with rural-urb<strong>an</strong> migration. The rural-urb<strong>an</strong> migration leads<br />
to diversified diets with a shift from basic staples such as sorghum,<br />
millet, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> maize to rice, wheat, livestock products, fruits, vegetables<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> processed foods.<br />
Prospects for economic growth during the next quarter century<br />
appear encouraging, with global income growth projected to average<br />
2.7% per year between 1993-2020. However, disparities in income levels<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> growth rates both between <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> within countries are likely to persist<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> poverty will remain entrenched in South Asia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Latin America<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to increase considerably in sub-Sahar<strong>an</strong> Africa, unless these<br />
countries implement perceptible <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> revolutionizing innovations.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> is one of the major cereals of the world <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is the staple food for<br />
about 2.7 billion people in Asia alone. Global dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for rice is<br />
projected to grow at least equal to population growth, thus requiring a<br />
70% increase in supply by the year 2025 (IRRI, 1993). The <strong>an</strong>nual growth<br />
rate in global rice production was only 1,8% during the 1985-92 period<br />
compared to 2.8% during 1975-85 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 3.6% during 1965-75. Over the<br />
years there has been a gradual decline in the armual growth rate of<br />
global rice production. The population in rice consuming countries is<br />
still growing at the rate of 1.8% per year. In order to meet the future<br />
dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> of rice, its production must be increased to at least match the<br />
rate of increase in population growth to maintain the food-population<br />
bal<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />
RESEARCH PRIORITIES
J.S, <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> 11<br />
produced in the irrigated systems, 21% in the rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s, 6.3% in<br />
the upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 3% in the flood-prone systems (FAO, 1993).<br />
The target for the intensively cropped irrigated system is to raise the<br />
experimental yield ceiling from 10 to 15 t ha"^ under tropical conditions.<br />
In less favorable rainfed areas, the target is to increase <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stabilize<br />
yields at 2.5 to 3 t ha“^from 1 t ha“\<br />
To make a qu<strong>an</strong>tum jump in the yield potential, it is imperative to<br />
underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in depth the fundamental physiological processes that<br />
determine growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yield. The driving forces for crop yield are well<br />
known; what is needed are both a source of nitrogen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> carbon as well<br />
as a sink for grain storage (Fischer, 1996). The opportunities to ch<strong>an</strong>ge<br />
these processes are:<br />
> Increasing the sink size <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> source through higher nutrient<br />
assimilation, particularly N <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> higher carbon assimilation<br />
>• Allocation of more storage reserves for grain<br />
> Increasing net carbon assimilation during grain filling through<br />
• enh<strong>an</strong>cing photosynthetic carbon assimilation<br />
• erdi<strong>an</strong>cing light interception <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> c<strong>an</strong>opy traits<br />
• utilization of org<strong>an</strong>ic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> inorg<strong>an</strong>ic carbon from soil<br />
• lodging toler<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
• reduction of photorespiration <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
• reduction in mainten<strong>an</strong>ce respiration.<br />
> Enh<strong>an</strong>cing the grain-filling duration.<br />
Concurrent with tr<strong>an</strong>scending the present yield barriers, the yield<br />
levels so achieved must be stabilized, providing durable resist<strong>an</strong>ce/<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce to biological <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> physical stresses through diversity in genes,<br />
cultivars <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> species. The environmental component must be<br />
appropriately addressed, ensuring the conservation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> perm<strong>an</strong>ency of<br />
the resource base of the intensive irrigated systems <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> how endogenous<br />
biological processes c<strong>an</strong> enh<strong>an</strong>ce the environment for the m<strong>an</strong>agement<br />
of pests <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> inputs (including nitrogen fixation) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> minimize soil<br />
losses in the upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s (Fischer, 1996) examined.<br />
Irrigated <strong>Rice</strong><br />
The target yield potential in the irrgated system is 15 t ha"^ To meet this<br />
target, the IRRI scientists proposed modifications of the present highyielding,<br />
semidwarf pl<strong>an</strong>t types <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> developed a new pl<strong>an</strong>t ideotype for<br />
direct seeded crop establishment.The traits targeted for this new pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
type are listed in Table 1.1 (Peng et al, 1994). Considerable progress has<br />
been made in developing varieties with the new traits which may break<br />
the yield barriers signific<strong>an</strong>tly.
Hybrid rice offers yet <strong>an</strong>other opportunity to boost the yield<br />
potential of rice. Hybrid rice has a yield adv<strong>an</strong>tage of 15-20% over the<br />
conventional high yielding varieties (Virm<strong>an</strong>i et al, 1993). There is<br />
evidence that the level of heterosis may be further enh<strong>an</strong>ced using<br />
indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tropical japónica hybrids based on the new pl<strong>an</strong>t type<br />
germplasm. The hybrid technology is targeted for areas with a high<br />
proportion of irrigated ecology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> areas with a high-labor l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ratio.<br />
Heterosis in rice is exploited to a considerable extent in China. The high<br />
productivity of hybrid rice enabled China to reduce its rice area from<br />
about 34.4 Mha in 1978 to about 31.98 Mha in 1988 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> at the same time<br />
increase, its rice production from 136 Mt to 169.1 Mt during the same<br />
period (Tr<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nguyen, 1998). This reduction in area of pl<strong>an</strong>ted rice<br />
not only promoted diversification in rice-based production systems for<br />
more incomes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> risk reduction, but also helped to minimize the<br />
country's global emission of green-house gases such as meth<strong>an</strong>e <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
nitrite oxide to the environment. Outside China, in hybrid rice was<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ted about 11,000 ha in 1992,34,000 ha in 1993, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 102,000 ha in 1996<br />
in Vietnam, with the average yield of 6 .5 1 ha“^or 15-30% higher th<strong>an</strong> the<br />
best commercial varieties. In India, farmers e:rew about 65,000 ha of<br />
12 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Table 1.1<br />
Traits of traditional <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> semidwarf rice varieties relative to the new<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t type under development at IRRI.<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>t Traditional Semidwarf, New pl<strong>an</strong>t type.<br />
part/trait tall variety modern proposed<br />
HYV 1960-1970 traits 1990<br />
Height (cm) >120-150 90-110 90-110<br />
Leaves Long, droopy Short, small, erect Thick, short, small,<br />
erect<br />
Tillers Low tillering Upright (compact). No unproductive<br />
high tillering. tillers<br />
Culm Tall <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thin Short <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stiff Short <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stiff<br />
P<strong>an</strong>icles 12-15/pl<strong>an</strong>t 15/pl<strong>an</strong>t 8/pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
Grains per p<strong>an</strong>icle 90-100 80-100 200-250<br />
Harvest index 0.30 0.50-0.55 0.55-0.60<br />
Growth duration 160-200 110-140 100-130<br />
(days)<br />
Grain yield 3-4 t ha'^ (not 6-10 t ha'^ 10-13 t ha"^<br />
potential N responsive) (N responsive) (N responsive)<br />
Root system Vigorous Vigorous<br />
Pests <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> diseases Variable resist<strong>an</strong>ce Multiple resist<strong>an</strong>ce Multiple resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Crop establishment Direct seeded or Direct seeded <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mainly direct seeded<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>spl<strong>an</strong>ted tr<strong>an</strong>spl<strong>an</strong>ted<br />
Varietal examples Peta Taichung<br />
native 1, IRS<br />
IR65598-112-2<br />
Source: Fischer, 1996.
J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> 13<br />
rice was also reported from B<strong>an</strong>gladesh, Korea DPR <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> My<strong>an</strong>mar.<br />
However, its impact in other countries is yet to be felt. Considerable<br />
<strong>research</strong> efforts are needed to enh<strong>an</strong>ce the level of heterosis, diversify<br />
CMS source, boost seed yield, improve grain quality <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> resist<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />
insect pests <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> diseases. Exploitation of apomixis will be a signific<strong>an</strong>t<br />
step forward in resolving the bottle-neck in hybrid seed technology.<br />
There are growing concerns world over about the extent, rate <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
effects of degradation of natural resources such as soil, water <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
biodiversity due to the dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s of Increasing population to boost food<br />
production. The irrigated rice culture has led to a build-up of salinity<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> waterlogging, micronutrient deficiencies, formation of hard p<strong>an</strong><br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> increased pest build-up, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> plateauing in the yield of rice varieties.<br />
Besides, the availability of water for irrigated rice is gradually being<br />
reduced due to clogging of waterways, growing competition for water<br />
betvyeen sectors, rising costs of developing new water resources. In<br />
years to come, the irrigated ecology will continue to provide the greatest<br />
potential to increase rice production. Sustainable rice production in the<br />
irrigated ecology will be increasingly dependent on yield increase <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
cropping intensity, as there is limited scope for the exp<strong>an</strong>sion of the net<br />
area. More rice needs to be produced with less water <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> less<br />
agrochemicals through efficient water m<strong>an</strong>agement, integrated nutrients<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pest m<strong>an</strong>agement,<br />
Rainfed <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Rainfed rice systems (rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> flood prone) have<br />
one major feature: uncertain moisture supply. Fields may have too<br />
much water, leading to submergence, or exposing the crop to drought<br />
stress. In the season the fields may be exposed to both drought <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
submergence for variable periods of crop growth. Most of the world^s<br />
resource-poor farmers grow rice in this risk-prone-ecology. It is<br />
imperative to take measures to minimize the risk of farmers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> enh<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
their productivity.<br />
Upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice is grown on about 20.4 Mha, which represents about<br />
14% of the world's rice area. Numerous subsistence farmers grow<br />
upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice mostly on poor, well-drained soil with <strong>an</strong> erratic rainfall <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
under shifting or perm<strong>an</strong>ent cultivation, or as a pioneer crop. <strong>Rice</strong> is<br />
grown either as a monocrop or in crop mixtures. The average yield in<br />
this ecology varies from 1 to 1.5 t ha^. These areas, marginal for rice<br />
production, are expected to grow rice in the medium term as long as the<br />
production from lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s fails to meet the dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>. The major problems
14 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
soil erosion, soil acidity, deficiency of micronutrients <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> weed<br />
infestation. The principal measures for improving upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice cropping<br />
systems are water <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soil conservation. Research should focus on<br />
underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing the fundamental physiological features of upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice.<br />
New approaches are needed, including national policy reorientation<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> political, will, in order to stabilize <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reduce vulnerable upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
rice areas <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> make them more economic, productive, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sustainable<br />
when exploited (Tr<strong>an</strong>, 1986).<br />
Rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice, including deepwater <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tidal wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s<br />
constitutes about 31% of the world's harvested rice areas <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 21% of the<br />
world's rice production (IRRI, 1993). The yield potential of the shallow<br />
rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> with assured rainfall is as good as that of irrigated<br />
areas, but has remained unexploited. These areas provide great<br />
opportunities for increased rice production. Woopereis (1993) suggested<br />
that to enh<strong>an</strong>ce productivity in the rainfed environment, <strong>research</strong> should<br />
focus on underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing processes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mech<strong>an</strong>isms to establish a basis<br />
for developing site-specific applications, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> appropriate crop models<br />
are needed to stimulate growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> examine the effects of variable<br />
weather on yields. Abiotic stresses such as submergence, elongation,<br />
salt toler<strong>an</strong>ce, P <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, Zn deficiency toler<strong>an</strong>ce, Al <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, Fe toxicity<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce, drought, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cold toler<strong>an</strong>ce are of signific<strong>an</strong>t import<strong>an</strong>ce in<br />
rainfed ecology. Research should focus on developing reliable screening<br />
techniques, indentifying suitable donors, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> proper underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing of<br />
genetic basis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> inherit<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />
BIOTECHNOLOGY<br />
Application of biotechnology in crop improvement has tremendous<br />
potential. It is estimated that by the year 2000, <strong>an</strong>nual farm sales of<br />
biotechnology-derived products are likely to total sothe $10 billion, with<br />
70% based on seeds <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 30% on veterinary products. Some $1 billion is<br />
spent armually on global <strong>research</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> development in biotechnology.<br />
Most of the bioengineering <strong>research</strong> carried out for cleveloping countries<br />
to date has been to lay the groundwork for future crop tr<strong>an</strong>sformation,<br />
but improvements in crop yields could come rapidly. The Rockefeller<br />
Foundation's support for rice biotechnology should begin to pay off in<br />
two to five years in the form of new varieties available to some Asi<strong>an</strong><br />
farmers. It is likely that efforts to improve the rice yield in Asia through<br />
biotechnology will result in a production increase of lO to 25% over the<br />
next 10 years (CGIAR,1997). The application of biotechnology in crop
J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> 15<br />
<strong>an</strong>thers or microspores (haploid <strong>breeding</strong>), exploitation of<br />
somoclonal variation in pl<strong>an</strong>ts regenerated from cultured cells,<br />
protoclonal variation in protoplast-derived pl<strong>an</strong>ts <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their seed<br />
progeny.<br />
> Production of tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic pl<strong>an</strong>t through DNA tr<strong>an</strong>sfer to pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
protoplasts using either chemical treatment (polyethylene glycol,<br />
PEG ) or electroporation for tr<strong>an</strong>sformation.<br />
> Insertion of genes coding for protein toxins from entomocidal<br />
bacteria, protein inhibitors of insect digestive enzymes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
certain lectins for insect pest resist<strong>an</strong>ce, developing herbicideresist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
cutivars.<br />
>■ Using molecular probes for disease diagnosis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> monitoring,<br />
which will allow more effective use of existing sources of<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />
V Developing rice genetic maps <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> markers to help identify the<br />
most import<strong>an</strong>t genetic components, modifying the level of<br />
expression of stress-induced rice genes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of alien<br />
genes that enh<strong>an</strong>ce a desired response. The high density<br />
molecular genetic map is of great value in map based cloning of<br />
agriculturally import<strong>an</strong>t genes. W<strong>an</strong>g et ah (1995) used BAG<br />
(bacterial artificial chromosome) libraries <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> identified clones<br />
carrying gene for bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Song et ah (1995)<br />
isolated by positioning cloning. The isolated gene was<br />
introduced into several elite rice cultivars through tr<strong>an</strong>sformation<br />
(Khush et ah, 1998).<br />
>* Protoplast fusion procedure, coupled with the regeneration of<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts from products of the fusion for the introgression of both<br />
nuclear <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cytoplasmic genes.<br />
>• Introduction of symbiotic biological nitrogen fixation.<br />
The greatest promise in rice improvement from the application of<br />
biotechnology may stem from DNA-marker based gene identification<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> gene insertion to create tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic rice (Wu, 1994). Marker assisted<br />
selection (MAS) was successfully employed for pyramiding four<br />
different genes (Xa^ xa^, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xa^^) for bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
(Hu<strong>an</strong>g et ah, 1997). Tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts c<strong>an</strong> be produced harboririg<br />
one or more insect resist<strong>an</strong>t gene(s) (Table 1.2). Among the tested<br />
insecticidal proteins, the four groups which are potentially useful<br />
against rice insect pests are:<br />
> Protease inhibitors such as serine proteases, cysteine proteases,<br />
zinc proteases, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> aspartyl proteases (Hilder et ah, 1993).<br />
> “ Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal proteins: A total of 20 insecticidal
16 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Table 1,2<br />
Some examples of tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts carrying agronomically<br />
import<strong>an</strong>t genes<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>sgene Gene tr<strong>an</strong>sfer method Useful trait Reference<br />
bar<br />
Microprojectile Toler<strong>an</strong>ce to herbicide Caocf fll., 1992<br />
bombardment<br />
bar PEG-mediated Toler<strong>an</strong>ce to herbicide Datta et al., 1992<br />
Coat protein Protoplast Toler<strong>an</strong>ce to stripe virus Hayakawa<br />
gene electroporation etal.,1992<br />
Chitinase PEG-mediated Sheath blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce Lin et al., 1995<br />
cnfIA(b) Protoplast Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to striped Fujimoto<br />
electroporation stem borer et al, 1993<br />
crylAib) Particle bombardment Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to yellow Wuhn et al, 1996<br />
stem borer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> striped<br />
stem borer<br />
crylAib) Particle bombardment Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to yellow<br />
stem borer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> striped<br />
Ghareyazie<br />
ei al, 1997<br />
stembordr<br />
crylAic) Particle bombardment Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to yellow<br />
stem borer<br />
Nayak<br />
et al, 1997<br />
CpTi PEG-mediated Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to striped Xu et al, 1996<br />
stem borer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pink<br />
stem borer<br />
Com Protoplast Insecticidal activity Irie et al, 1996<br />
cystatin (CC) electroporation for Sitophilus zeamais<br />
Source: Khushetal (1998).<br />
two major rice insect pests, striped stem borer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leaf folder,<br />
th<strong>an</strong> the untr<strong>an</strong>sformed control pl<strong>an</strong>ts (Fujimoto et at, 1993).<br />
> Lectins-Snowdrop lectin (GNA); GNA added to artificial diet has<br />
been shown to inhibit the growth of brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper (BPH).<br />
The gene encoding GNA has been cloned (Boulter et al, 1993;<br />
Gatehouse et fll.,1994). Once the GNA gene is introduced into<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic pl<strong>an</strong>ts, it is expected that the pl<strong>an</strong>ts will become<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t to BPH <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> green leaf folder.<br />
> Ribosome-inactivating proteins: This group of proteins has been<br />
shown to inhibit the growth of certain species of insects <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fungi.<br />
The major fungal diseases which attack rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts are Pyricularia<br />
oryzae <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rhizocionia sol<strong>an</strong>i causing serious crop damage in the form of<br />
blast <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sheath blight diseases. The following proteins are potentially<br />
useful against fungal pathogens of rice.<br />
> Chitinase <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> p-l,3-gluc<strong>an</strong>ases: These enzymes are found in<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts arid microbes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are capable of degrading the cell walls of<br />
fungi. In some inst<strong>an</strong>ces, the <strong>an</strong>tifungal activity of chitinase in<br />
vitro is enh<strong>an</strong>ced when applied in combination with p-1,3-<br />
gluc<strong>an</strong>ase. <strong>Rice</strong> has been tr<strong>an</strong>sformed using the chitinase sene
J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong><br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> such tr<strong>an</strong>sformed pl<strong>an</strong>ts showed some resist<strong>an</strong>ce to R. sol<strong>an</strong>i<br />
(Anuratha et al., 1994; Lamb et al.j 1994).<br />
> Ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIP): Several genes coding for<br />
RIP have been cloned. <strong>Rice</strong> has been tr<strong>an</strong>sformed with a RIP gene,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> relatively high levels of RIP were found in tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic pl<strong>an</strong>ts.<br />
The effectiveness of these tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic pl<strong>an</strong>ts against rice fungal<br />
pathogens, including R. sol<strong>an</strong>i are under investigation.<br />
> Thionins; Thionins are polypeptides with <strong>an</strong>tifungal activities.<br />
The usefulness of producing tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic pl<strong>an</strong>ts containing a<br />
thionin gene needs to be explored.<br />
> Antifungal peptides.<br />
Wu (1994) has summarized (Table 1.3) the genes currently available<br />
for producing insect resist<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fungal disease resist<strong>an</strong>t tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic rice<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts. He has projected that in about 12 to 18 years tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic disease <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
insect resist<strong>an</strong>t rice varieties will be available to farmers. An estimated<br />
<strong>an</strong>nual benefit of using insect resist<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> disease resist<strong>an</strong>t tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic<br />
rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts in the field is projected to be $ 13.4 billion (Table 1.4).<br />
Table 1.3<br />
Potential for producing insect <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fungal resist<strong>an</strong>t tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic<br />
rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts (Wu, 1994)<br />
Desired<br />
new traits<br />
Insect resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Fungal diseases<br />
Target insect or fungus<br />
Yellow stem borer; Striped<br />
stem borer; <strong>Rice</strong> leaf folder.<br />
Gall midge<br />
Brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper; Green<br />
leaf folder<br />
Sheath blight (Rsaloni)<br />
Blast (P.oryzae)<br />
Potentially useful genes<br />
for tr<strong>an</strong>sforming rice<br />
Genes encoding protease<br />
inhibitors CpTi, Pinll, SbTv, B.T.<br />
genes: cryIA(b),crylA(c)f<br />
Crylll, Pinll RIP z^nes<br />
GÑA gene, RIP genes<br />
Gene encoding chitinases,<br />
fil, 3-gluc<strong>an</strong>ases, RIPs, thionins,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>tifungal peptides<br />
Table 1.4 Estimates of effects or benefits of the rice biotechnology programs (Wu, 1994).<br />
Trait or yield<br />
enh<strong>an</strong>cement<br />
Multiple insect<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Multiple disease<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Time to production<br />
(years)<br />
Annual effect or benefit<br />
after realization<br />
Optinustic Conservative Area Yield Qu<strong>an</strong>tity Value in<br />
(M.ha) (%) (Mt) billion<br />
dollars<br />
12 21<br />
15 22<br />
37 30 41 8.0<br />
50 15 27 5.4
18 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
> CP (coat protein) genes for the two viruses that cause tungro<br />
disease have been cloned (Hay et ah, 1991) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> efforts are underway<br />
to express these genes in rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts. A coat protein gene for<br />
rice stripe virus was introduced into two japónica varieties by<br />
electroporation of protoplasts (Hayakawa et ah, 1992). The<br />
result<strong>an</strong>t tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic pl<strong>an</strong>ts expressed high levels of CP <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
exhibited a signific<strong>an</strong>t level of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to virus infection; this<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce was inherited by the progeny.<br />
> Starch levels <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> dry matter accumulation were enh<strong>an</strong>ced in<br />
potato tubers of pl<strong>an</strong>ts tr<strong>an</strong>sformed with glgc^^ gene from E. coli<br />
encoding ADPGPP (ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase), the critical<br />
enzyme for inregulating starch biosynthesis in pl<strong>an</strong>t tissues (Stark<br />
et ah, 1992). The glgc^^. gene has been introduced into rice at IRRI<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its expression is being investigated (Khush et ah, 1998).<br />
The advent of molecular markers is expected to modify rice <strong>breeding</strong><br />
drastically^ since they enable the number of basic progenitors to be<br />
narrowed down <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> allow the creation of rice genetic maps.<br />
Biotechnological approaches need a high investment. It is imperative to<br />
think a bal<strong>an</strong>ce between the conventional <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> biotechnological<br />
approaches. They should be complementary rather th<strong>an</strong> competitive for<br />
scarce resources.<br />
THE VISION<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> production should not be viewed in isolation but as a part of a<br />
holistic farming system in which the farmer's income <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> welfare as<br />
well as the diversity of the social biological <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> physical environments<br />
should be integrated into the design of appropriate technologies.<br />
Technological adv<strong>an</strong>cements are useful when accomp<strong>an</strong>ied by<br />
appropriate national policies which are supported by consistent <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
concrete programs. Therefore, long-term sustainable rice production<br />
requires the formulation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> implementation of relev<strong>an</strong>t program for<br />
rice <strong>research</strong>, development <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> production (Shastry ei fll.,1996).<br />
The 2020 vision is of a world 'where every person has access to<br />
sufficient food to sustain a healthy, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> productive life, where<br />
malnutrition is absent, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> where food originates from efficient,<br />
effective, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> low-cost food systems that are compatible with<br />
sustainable use of natural resources' (IFPRI, 1995). Existing technology<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> knowledge will not permit production of all the food needed in 2020<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> beyond. Most of the increase in food production will have to come
J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> 19<br />
economically or environmentally sound option in most parts of the<br />
world. Some of the yield increase will occur as more inputs are used <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
as production methods are improved. However^ accelerated investment<br />
in agricultural <strong>research</strong> is essential to achieve the required productivity<br />
increases. Low-income developing countries are grossly under investing<br />
in agricultural <strong>research</strong> compared with industrialized countries, even<br />
though agriculture accounts for a much larger share of their employment<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> incomes. Their public sector expenditures on agricultural <strong>research</strong><br />
are typically less th<strong>an</strong> 0.5% of the agricultural gross domestic product,<br />
compared with about 1% in higher income developing countries <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
2-5% in industrialized countries (Pardey et at, 1991). There is also a need<br />
to exp<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> realign international development assist<strong>an</strong>ce. Developed<br />
coimtries had agreed to allocate at least 0.7% of the gross national<br />
product (GNP) to foreign assist<strong>an</strong>ce. Most countries have not reached<br />
this target <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reduced their average contribution to 0.3% of GNP. The<br />
current downward trend in international development assist<strong>an</strong>ce must<br />
be reversed. To improve the effectiveness of the aid, each recipient<br />
country should develop a coherent strategy for achieving its goals<br />
related to food security, poverty, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> natural resources <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> should<br />
identify the most appropriate uses of international assist<strong>an</strong>ce (Pinstrup-<br />
Andersen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ya-Lorch, 1996),<br />
References<br />
Anuratha,C.S., Lin,W., Muthukrishn<strong>an</strong>, S., Datta, S., Potrykus, L, Vidyasekarati, P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mew,<br />
T. 1994, Genetic engineering of rice for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to sheath blight <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insects , 7th<br />
Meeting Inti. Program on <strong>Rice</strong> Biotechnology, Abstract, p.l59.<br />
Boulter, D., Gateouse, A.M.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>g, M. B. 1993, Genetically engineered insect resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
to the brown pl<strong>an</strong>t hopper (BPH) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other sucking insects, 6th Annual Meeting Inti,<br />
Program on <strong>Rice</strong> Biotechnology, Abstract, p. 9.<br />
Cao, J., Du<strong>an</strong>, X., McElroy, D.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Wu, R. 1992, Generation of herbicide resist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts following microprojectile-mediated tr<strong>an</strong>sformation of suspension<br />
culture cells. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Cell Rep., 11:586-591.<br />
CGIAR( Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research). 1997. Press Release, 9<br />
Oct., 1997, Washit^toni.DC.<br />
Cocking, E.C. 1996. Progress in rice biotechnology. In: Proc. 18th Session Inti, <strong>Rice</strong> Comm.,<br />
Rome, Italy 5-9 September, 1994. FAO, Rome, pp. 39-43.<br />
Datta, S.K., Datta, K,, Solt<strong>an</strong>ifar, N., Donn, G. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Potrykus. 1992. Herbicide resist<strong>an</strong>t indica<br />
rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts from IRRI <strong>breeding</strong> line IR72 after PEG mediated tr<strong>an</strong>sformation of<br />
protoplasts. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Mol, Biel., 20:619-629.<br />
FAO, 1993. Investment in rice <strong>research</strong> in the CGMR : a global perspective. Report of the<br />
Inter-Cehtre Review of <strong>Rice</strong>., AGR/TAC:IAR/93/4, Technical Advisory Secretariat,<br />
Rome, 84 pp.
20 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Fujimoto, H., Itoh,K., Yamamoto, M., Kyozuka, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shimamoto, K. 1993. Insect resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
rice generated by introduction of a modified gamma-endotoxin gene of Bacillus<br />
thuringiensis. Biotechnology, 11:1151-1155.<br />
Gatehouse, J. A ., Powell, K., W<strong>an</strong>g, M., Hilder, V. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Boulter, D. 1994, Progress towards<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic rice with resist<strong>an</strong>ce to rice brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper. 7th Meeting Inti. Program on<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Biotechnology, Abstract, p. 59.<br />
Ghareyazie, B., Alinia, F., Menguito, C.A., Rubia, L., de Palma, J.M., Liw<strong>an</strong>ag, E.A., Cohen,<br />
M. B., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bennett, J. 1997. Enh<strong>an</strong>ced resist<strong>an</strong>ce to two stem borers in <strong>an</strong><br />
aromatic rice containing a synthetic crylAtb) gene. Mol. Breed. 3:401-414.<br />
Hay, J.M., Jones, M.C., Blakebrough, M., Dasgupta, I., Davies, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hull, R. 1991. An<br />
<strong>an</strong>alysis of the sequence of <strong>an</strong> infectious clone of rice tungro bacilliform virus, a pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
pararetovirus. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:2615-2621.<br />
Hayakawa, T., Zhu, Y., Itoh, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kimura, Y. 1992. Genetically engineered rice resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
to rice stripe virus, <strong>an</strong> insect-tr<strong>an</strong>smitted virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Set. USA 89:9865-9869.<br />
Hilder, V. A., Gatehouse, A.M.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Boulter, D, 1993. Tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic pl<strong>an</strong>ts conferring insect<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce: protease inhibitor approach. In; Tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic Pl<strong>an</strong>ts S.D. Kung, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> R. Wu, (eds.)<br />
Acad. Press, NY, voi. l, pp. 317-338.<br />
Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N,, Angekes, E.R., Domingo, J., Magp<strong>an</strong>tay, G., Singh, S., Zh<strong>an</strong>g, G., Kumaravadivel,<br />
N. , Bennett, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1997. Pyramiding of bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes in<br />
rice: marker assisted selection using RFLP <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> PCR. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:313-320.<br />
IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute). 1995, A 2020 vision for Pood<br />
Agriculture <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Environment ; The vision, challenge <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> recommended action.<br />
IFPRI, Washington, DC, USA, 50 pp.<br />
Irie, K., Hosoyama, H., Takeuchi, T., Iwabuchi, K,, Watnabe, H., Abe, M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Arei, S. 1996.<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic rice established to express corn cystatin exhibits strong inhibitory activity<br />
against gut proteinases. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Mol, Biol. 30:149-157.<br />
IRRI (International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute). 1993.1993-1995: IRRI <strong>Rice</strong> Alm<strong>an</strong>ac, Los B<strong>an</strong>os,<br />
Philippines.<br />
Khush, G.S,, Bennett, J., Datta, S.K., Brar, D;S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> LI, Z, 1998. Adv<strong>an</strong>ces in rice <strong>genetics</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
biotechnology. Paper presented at 19th session Inti. <strong>Rice</strong> Comm., PAO, Cairo, Egypt, 7-9<br />
September, 1998,<br />
Lamb, C.J., Zhu, Q., Xu, Y., Dabi, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nelson, A. 1994. Engineeringerüiahced.resist<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />
microbial disease in rice, 7th Meeting Inti. Program on <strong>Rice</strong> Biotechnölögy^ Abstract,<br />
p.l58.<br />
'<br />
Lin, W,, Anuratha, C.S^. Datta, K., PotrykUs, I., Muthukrishn<strong>an</strong>, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Datt^/ S.BÎ. 1995.<br />
Genetic engineering of rice for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to sheath blight. Biotechnology 13:686-691.<br />
Nayak, P., Basu, D., Das, S., Basu, A.^ Ghosh, D., Ramakrishn<strong>an</strong>, N.A., Ghpsh> M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sen,<br />
S.K. 1997. Tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic elite indica rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts expressing CryIA(c) Ä-endotoxin of Bacillus<br />
thuringiensis are resist<strong>an</strong>t against yellow stem borer (Sciropophaga incertuldsy: Proc. Natl.<br />
Acad. Sei. USA 94: 2111-2116. ,.}<br />
Pardey, P.G., Roseboom, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Andersen, J.R. (eds.) 1991. Agricutural Research Policy:<br />
International Qu<strong>an</strong>titative Perspectives. Cambridge, U.K, Cambridge University Press:<br />
462 pp. ■<br />
Peng, S., Khush,G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cassm<strong>an</strong>, K.G. 1994. Evolution of the new pl<strong>an</strong>t ideotype for<br />
increased yield potential. In; Breaking the Yield Barriers: K.G.Cassm<strong>an</strong> (ed) Proc. Workshop<br />
on rice yield potential in favourable environments. Chap. 2. Los B<strong>an</strong>os, Philippines, IRRI.<br />
Pinstrup-Andersen, P., P<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ya-Lorch, R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rosegr<strong>an</strong>t, W.1996. The world fdod situation:<br />
recent developments, emerging issues <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> long term prospects, 2020 Visión Pôod Policy<br />
Report, International Pood Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.. d. 36.
J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> 21<br />
Shastry, S.V., Trariy D.V., Nguyen, V.N- <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong>, J.S. 1996. Sustainable integrated ríce<br />
production. In; Proc. of the 18th Session Inti. <strong>Rice</strong> Comm. FAO, Rome, pp. 45-58.<br />
Song, W. Y., W<strong>an</strong>g, G.L., Chen, L.L., Kim, H.S., Holsten, T., W<strong>an</strong>g, B., Zhai, W.X., Zhu, L.H.,<br />
Fauquet, C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ronald, P. 1995. The rice disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene, Xa21, encodes a<br />
receptor kinase-like protein. Science: 270:1804-1806.<br />
Stark, D.M., Timmerm<strong>an</strong>, K.P., Barry, G.F., Preiss, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kishore, G.M. 1992. Regulation of<br />
the amount of starch in pl<strong>an</strong>t tissues by ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase. Science: 285:<br />
287-292.<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>, D.V. 1986. An overview of the upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice in the world. In; 'Progress in Upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research', pp. 51-66, M<strong>an</strong>ila, IRRI.<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>, D.V. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nguyen, V.N. 1998. Global hybrid rice: Progress, issues <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> challenges. Paper<br />
presented 19th Session Inti. <strong>Rice</strong> Comm,, FAO, Cairo, Egypt, 7-9th September 1998.<br />
Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S., Prasad, M.N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kumar, J. 1993. Breaking the yield barrier of rice throughout<br />
exploitation of heterosis. In: K. Murailidhar<strong>an</strong><strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> E.A. Siddiq (eds.) New Frontiers in <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research, Directorate of <strong>Rice</strong> Research, Hyderabad, India, pp. 76-85.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g,G., Holsten, T.E., Song, W.Y., W<strong>an</strong>g, H.P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ronald, P.C. 1995. Construction of a rice<br />
bacterial artificial chromosome library <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> identification of clones linked to Xa^^ disease<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce locus. Pl<strong>an</strong>t J. 7:525-533.<br />
Woopereis, M.C.S. 1993. Qu<strong>an</strong>tifying the impact of soil <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> climate variability on rainfed<br />
rice production. (Ph.D Thesis). Wageningen Agrie. Univ. The Netherl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s. 188 pp.<br />
Wu, R. 1994. Report of the committee on Genetic Engineering {Molecular Analysis of <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genes). <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics News Letter.ll: 59-63.<br />
Wuhn, J., Kloti, A., Burkhardt, P.K., GhoshBiswas, G.C., Launis, K„ Iglesias, V.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Potrykus, 1.1996. Tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic indica rice <strong>breeding</strong> line IR58 expressing a synthetic<br />
gene from Bflci7/«s thuringiensis provides effective insect pest control. Bioiechonology<br />
14: 171-176<br />
Xu, D., Xue, Q., McElroy, D., Mawal, Y., Hilder, V.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Wu, R. 1996. Constitutive<br />
expression of a cowpea trypsin inhibitor gene CpTi, in tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts confers<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce to two major insect pests. Mo/. Breed. 2:167-173.
Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong><br />
J. S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong>* <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S. S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i*^<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Exploitation of heterosis (hybrid vigor) in corn has been a l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>mark in<br />
crop <strong>breeding</strong>. Heterosis has been exploited in a nuinber of crops such as<br />
bajra^ sorghum^ cotton, sunflower etc. However, its use has been limited<br />
in self-pollinated crops. In 1926, Jones first reported the occurrence of<br />
heterosis in rice. Its commercial exploitation was demonstrated in China<br />
in 1976 after development of the first set of stable <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> high yielding threeline<br />
hybrid rice varieties by Professor Yu<strong>an</strong> Long Ping <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> his team of<br />
scientists. The area pl<strong>an</strong>ted to hybrid rice in China rapidly increased to<br />
about 17 Mha in 1995. Hybrid rice varieties outyielded the commercial<br />
check varieties by about 15-20%. The high productivity of hybrid rice<br />
enabled China to reduce its rice area from about 34.4 Mha in 1978 to<br />
about 31.98 Mha in 1988 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> at the same time increased its rice<br />
production from 136.9 Mt to 169.1 Mt during the same period (Tr<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Nguyen, 1998). Presently, China is the leading producer of hybrid rice in<br />
the world (Table 2.1) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more th<strong>an</strong> 50% of the 32 Mha of rice area is<br />
under hybrid rice, accounting for more th<strong>an</strong> 70% of the total production.<br />
Outside China, hybrid rice was pl<strong>an</strong>ted to about 11,000 ha in 1992,34,000<br />
ha in 1993, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 102,000 ha in 1996 in Vietnam, with <strong>an</strong> average yield of 6.5<br />
t ha'^ or 15-30% higher th<strong>an</strong> the best commercial varieties (Tr<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Nguyen, 1998). In India, farmers grew about 65,000 ha of hybrid rice in<br />
1996, Limited commercial cultivation of hybrid rice was reported in<br />
B<strong>an</strong>gladesh, Korea DPR <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> My<strong>an</strong>mar.<br />
* Former <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics Specialist GUY/91/001, FAO of the United Nations,
24. <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Table 2,1<br />
Area, production <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yield of hybrid rice in China<br />
Kind Area (Mha'^) Production (Mt) Yield (kgha'^)<br />
Total rice 32,61 185.41 5685.70<br />
Conventional rice 14.97 67.93 4531.50<br />
Hybrid rice 17.64 117.48 6660.10<br />
Hybrid rice (as of total rice) 54.10 63.36 117.10<br />
Source: Xizhi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mao (1994).<br />
Heterosis is defined as the superior perform<strong>an</strong>ce in growth, vigor,<br />
vitality, reproductive capacity, stress resist<strong>an</strong>ce, adaptability, grain yield,<br />
grain quality <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other physiological traits of the Fj population of two<br />
genetically diverse parents (P) compared to either the mid-parent (MP) or<br />
better parent (BP) of the cross or to the check (CK). Heterosis is expressed<br />
as:<br />
I. Mid-parent heterosis (MP)<br />
H ^ X 100%<br />
MP<br />
II, Heterobeltiosis or heterc^is over the better parent (BP) value<br />
H = Fi"BP<br />
BP<br />
X 100%<br />
III. St<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard heterosis or heterosis over the check variety (CK)<br />
p „ p v<br />
H ^<br />
CK<br />
X 100%<br />
In general, the expression of increased vigor of Fi hybrid over its<br />
parents is called positive heterosis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that of decreased vigor is<br />
designated as negative heterosis.<br />
The success story of hybrid rice in China aroused spurts of interests at<br />
the International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (IRRI), Philippines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in m<strong>an</strong>y<br />
national rice <strong>research</strong> programs to intensify <strong>research</strong> on hybrid rice. The<br />
trials conducted at IRRI (Table 2.2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 2.4), Philippines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in several<br />
national programs, viz. Philippines, India, Vietnam, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Malaysia (Table<br />
2.3), the rice hybrids outyielded the best check variety .(Virm<strong>an</strong>i, 1996).<br />
M<strong>an</strong>y heterotic rice hybrids are released for commercial cultivation in<br />
countries other th<strong>an</strong> China (Table 2.5),<br />
The positive st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard heterosis in grain yield reported in rice<br />
hybrids is attributed to the increased dry matter production due to<br />
increased leaf area index, higher crop growth rate <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> harvest index,<br />
due to high spikelet number <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> increased grain weight (Ponnuthurai et<br />
'l 0R4V<br />
in nnm VtPr rtf n a n irlta c « » r n la n f <strong>an</strong>ilrtiliafc! niii-
J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S.S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i 25<br />
Tabic 2.2 Comparison of the highest yielding rice hybrids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> check<br />
variety in yield trail at IRRI during 1986-95<br />
Season Trial Hybrid<br />
Yield<br />
(t ha'b<br />
Difference Percentage<br />
of check<br />
Growth<br />
duration<br />
(1) (2)<br />
(3) (4) (5) (6) (7)<br />
1986 DS I. IR54754A/IRR6R 7.4 1.2 119 126<br />
n IR54754A/ARC 11353R 7.9 2.3 142 133<br />
1986 WS I IR54752A/IR64 3.9 1.0* 134 126<br />
n IR19728A/IR25167-9-2 3.6 0.6* 120 122<br />
III IR46830A/IR5OR 4.1 0.7* 120 110<br />
1987 DS I IR46830A/IR29723-143-3-2-IR 6.4 1.8* 139 112<br />
II IR54755A/IR2797-125-3-3-2R 7.8 1.8* 130 130<br />
III IR54752A/ARC 11353R 6.8 1.0* 117 128<br />
1988 DS IV IR54752A/IR64R 5.3 0.9* 120 120<br />
VI IR54752A/IR13146-45-2-3 6.8 1.1* 119 116<br />
1988 WS IR46830A/IR9761-19-IR 3.2 1.0* 145 105<br />
1989 DS I IR54752A/IR9761-19-IR 6,3 1.5* 131 111<br />
II IR54752/IR28228-119-2-3-1-IR 6.5 1.0* 119 124<br />
1989WS II IR54752A/54742-22-19-3R 3.5 0.8* 131 136<br />
1990DS IV IR58025A/Ir29723-143-3-2-IR 5.6 1,0* 121 128<br />
1991DS I IR62829A/IR35366-62-1-2-2-3 4.7 0.7* 118 112<br />
II IR58025Á/IR54745-2-45-3-2-4R 5.4 1.2* 128 122<br />
1991WS I IR58025A/IR19058-107-IR 6.4 1.2* 123 113<br />
n 1R62829A/IR47310-94-4-3-IR 5.1 1.1* 128 120<br />
1992DS III IR58025A/IR46R 6.3 0.8* 114 117<br />
1992WS IV IR58025A/IR54056-64-2-2-2 4,4 0.7* 119 126<br />
1993DS II IR58025A/IR34686-179-1-2-IR 7.4 0.8* 112 128<br />
1993WS I IR58025A/BG915 4.0 0.8* 125 105<br />
1994WS I IR58025A/IR59606-119-3 5.8 1.0* 121 105<br />
II IR68275A/IR46R 6,6 1.6* 132 122<br />
1995DS I IR58025A/IR58103-62-3 9,5 1.6* 120 114<br />
II IR58025A/RP633-76-IR 9.6 1.6* 120 121<br />
DS, Dry season; WS, Wet season.<br />
* Signific<strong>an</strong>t at least at 5% level using LSD test.<br />
Source: Virm<strong>an</strong>i (1996),<br />
compensation of yield components <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cultivation practices (Kim, 1985;<br />
Akita, 1988).<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> hybrids showing positive heterosis for adverse temperature,<br />
soil conditions <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> water regime will be of immense import<strong>an</strong>ce in<br />
developing rice hybrids for stress environments. Ti<strong>an</strong> et al. (1980) have<br />
reported positive heterosis for drought toler<strong>an</strong>ce, Akbar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yabuno<br />
(1975) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senadhira <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i (1987) for salt toler<strong>an</strong>ce; Chauh<strong>an</strong><br />
et al. (1983) for ratooning ability <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh (1983) for deep water<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce in rice hybrids.
26 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Table 2.3<br />
Yield adv<strong>an</strong>tage of some elite IRRI-bred rice hybrids in<br />
national trials during 1990-1993<br />
Country Year <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
season<br />
(1) (2)<br />
India<br />
Location<br />
(3)<br />
Hybrid<br />
(4)<br />
Yield Percentage<br />
(tha'^) of best check<br />
(5) (6)<br />
1990 WS M<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ya IR58025A/IR976M9-IR 9.3 112<br />
1991 DS M<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ya IR58025A/IR29723-143-3-2-IR 7.0 125<br />
Hyderabad IR62829A/IR10198-66-2R 6.8 128<br />
1991 WS Hyderabad IR62829A/IR10198-66-2R 7.0 117<br />
Maruteru IR62829A/IR35366-40-3R 6.3 112<br />
New Delhi IR62829A/IR35366-40-3R 11.6 123<br />
Hyderabad IR62829A/IR28238-109-2R 5.2 121<br />
M<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ya 1R58025A/IR40750-82-3R 6.4 121<br />
IR58025A/IR54742-22-19-3R 6.2 117<br />
Faizabad IR58025A/IR40750’82-3R 4.6 126<br />
1992 WS Hyderabad IR58025A/IR34686-179-1-2-1R 7.3 109<br />
M<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ya IR58025A/IR32419-28-3-1-3 7.5 114<br />
Coimbatore IR58025A/IR39323-182-2-3-3R 6.3 131<br />
Faizabad IR58025A/IR46R 6.6 135<br />
Cuttack IR62829A/IR46R 5.3 143<br />
Vietnam<br />
1990 WS Omon IR62829A/IR29723-143-3-2-1R 6.7 129<br />
Omon IR58025A/IR29723-143-3-2-1R 7.6 146<br />
1991 DS Omon IR62629A/IR29723-143^3-2-lR 6.1 122<br />
Omon IR58025A/IR29723-143-3-2-1R 6.0 120<br />
1991 WS Omon IR62928A/IR29723-143-3-2-1R 4.9 132<br />
Omon IR58025A/IR29723-143-3-2-1R 4.6 124<br />
1992 WS Omon IR62829A/IR29723-143-3-2-1R 5.5 112<br />
Omon IR58025A/IR21567-18-3R 6.2 112<br />
Omon IR58025A/IR52287-15-2-3-2R 6.7 144<br />
H<strong>an</strong>oi IR58025A/IR29723-143R 5.1 150<br />
IR58025A/IR66R 5.1 150<br />
IR62829A/IR10198-66 5.7 167<br />
1993 DS Omon IR62829A/IR47310-94-4-3-1R 5.8 110<br />
T<strong>an</strong>hiep IR62829A/IR47310-94-4-3-1R 7.3 112<br />
Binhau IR58025A/IR54742-22-19-3R 7.5 101<br />
Philippines<br />
1992 DS Maligaya IR58025A/IR32419-28-3-13 7.9 113<br />
S<strong>an</strong> Mateo IR62829A/IR20933-68-21-1-2R 8.0 139<br />
1993 DS Maligaya<br />
Group I IR64608A/IR29723-143-3-2-1A 7.8 122.<br />
Group II IR58025A/IR54742-22-79-3R 7.7 131<br />
S<strong>an</strong> Mateo<br />
Group I IR64608A/IR29723-143-3-2-1R 6.3 102<br />
Group II IR5025A/IR34686-179-1-2-1R 8.1 112<br />
Malaysia<br />
1990 DS Bumbong IR62829A/IR29723-143-3-2-1R 5.8 141<br />
Lima IR58025A/IR29723-143-3-2-1R 5.1 124<br />
1991WS Bumbong IR58025A/IR29723-143-3-2-1R 5.6 140<br />
Lima<br />
/n<strong>an</strong>rirzrio ida q o 11> K£. 117
J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S.S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i 27<br />
Table 2.4<br />
Yield adv<strong>an</strong>tage of some elite IRRI-bred rice hybrids evaluated in<br />
some collaborating countries during 1993-94<br />
Country Location Season<br />
Hybrid<br />
Yield<br />
(tha-^)<br />
Difference<br />
from check<br />
i<br />
1<br />
(1) (2)<br />
(3)<br />
(4)<br />
(5)<br />
(t ha'^)<br />
(6)<br />
1 • India<br />
'i Hyderabad 1993WS IR58025/IR54742 6.4 1.1*<br />
; IR58025A/IR32809 5.8 1.5*<br />
IR58025A/IR13419 5.6 1.3*<br />
i<br />
IR58025A/IR72R 5.6 1.3*<br />
{<br />
IR62829A/IR40750 5.2 0,8*<br />
■i 1994 DS IR62829A/IR40750 7.0 1.5*<br />
1 IR58025A/IR21567 7.5 1.2*<br />
n 1994 WS IR58025A/RP633-76-1 7.7 1.2*<br />
1 IR62829A/IR29723-143R 7.7 1.2*<br />
■i Karnal 1993 WS IR58025A/IR20933 9.6 0.9*<br />
i IR58025A/IR10198 9.8 0.8*<br />
1 Delhi 1994 WS IRa8025A/IR34686-179 5.2 1.0*<br />
j Kapurthala 1993 WS IR62829A/IR29723 9.6 2.4*<br />
1994 WS PMS10A/BR827-35-R 6.6 2.6*<br />
Chinsura 1993 WS IR58025A/IR10198 5.6 1.0*<br />
i 1993 WS IR62829A/IR54883 6.2 1.6*<br />
I Coimbatore 1993 WS .IR58025A/IR32809 5.6 1.3*<br />
j Wyra 1994 WS IR58025A/IR54791-19R 7.9 1.3*<br />
i<br />
i M<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ya 1993 WS IR58025A/IR13419 6.6 1.3*<br />
■] IR58025A/IR54742 7.1 2.4*<br />
1 1994 DS IR58025A/RP1057 10.0 2.5*<br />
IR62829A/IR40750 8.7 1.5*<br />
PMS8A/IR46R 8.7 1.5*<br />
1994 WS IR58025A/IR54969-41 9.2 2.8*<br />
IR58025A/RP633-76-1 8.0 1.6*<br />
■) Faizabad 1993 WS IR58025A/IR13419 7.6 1.5*<br />
■1 1994 WS IR58025A/IR25912-81 7.3 1.7*<br />
Karjat 1994 WS IR58025A/BR827-35R 3.2 2.5*<br />
1 Pakist<strong>an</strong><br />
1 Kalashah Kaku 1994 WS IR58025A/IR21567 6.9 2.4*<br />
1 Sialkot 1994 WS IR58025A/IR21567 5.1 1.2*<br />
j Farookabad 1994 WS IR58025A/IR29723 6.4 0.6*<br />
Philippines<br />
Maligaya 1994 WS IR68275A/IR46R 6.5 1.1*<br />
i S<strong>an</strong> Mateo 1994 DS PMS8A/IR29723 8.7 1.1*<br />
IRRI 1994 WS IR58025A/IR59606-119 5.8 1.0*<br />
IR68275A/IR46R 6.6 1.3*<br />
1\<br />
n IR58025A/IR52774-B-B 6.6 1.3*<br />
Vietnam<br />
ij Omon 1994 DS IR58025A/IR34686 7.8 1.9*<br />
'■i<br />
-jt IR58025A/IR25912 7.3 1.3*
28 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Table 2.5<br />
Heterotic rice hybrids released for commercial cultivation<br />
during 1993-94 in countries other th<strong>an</strong> China<br />
Country Hybrid Released as Year Recommended for<br />
Vietnam IR58025A/IR29723 UTL-1 1993 Mekong Delta<br />
IR62829A/IR29723 UTL-2 1993 Mekong Delta<br />
India IR58025A/Vajram APHR4 1994 Tel<strong>an</strong>g<strong>an</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Rayalseema<br />
IR62829A/MTU9992 APHR-2 1994 Tel<strong>an</strong>g<strong>an</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Rayalseema<br />
IR62829A/IR10198 MGR-1 1994 Tamil Nadu<br />
IR58025A/IR9761-194R KRH-1 1994 Karnataka<br />
IR58025A/KMR 3R KRH-2 1994 Karnataka<br />
IR62829A/Ajaya R CHNRH-3 1996 Boro Season<br />
in West Bengal<br />
IR58025A/IR40750 DRRH-1 1996 Tel<strong>an</strong>g<strong>an</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Rayalaseema<br />
Philippines ' IR62829A/IR29723-143-3-2-1R Rc26H<br />
(Magat)<br />
Source: Virm<strong>an</strong>i (1996); Siddiq et ah (1996).<br />
GENETIC BASIS OF HETEROSIS<br />
1994 Cagay<strong>an</strong><br />
Valley<br />
The genetic basis of heterosis is sought in finding expl<strong>an</strong>ations for<br />
in<strong>breeding</strong> depression in cross-pollinated crops <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> vigor expressed in<br />
hybrids of inbreds. There are two hypotheses to explain heterosis:<br />
(i) Domin<strong>an</strong>ce hypothesis.<br />
(ii) Overdomin<strong>an</strong>ce hypothesis.<br />
Domin<strong>an</strong>ce Hypothesis<br />
Davenport suggested the overdomin<strong>an</strong>ce hypothesis in 1908. According<br />
to this hypothesis^ heterosis results from action^ interaction <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
complementation olfavorable domin<strong>an</strong>t genes brought together in <strong>an</strong><br />
hybrid of two inbreds. The domin<strong>an</strong>t genes are presumed to be favorable<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> recessive genes deleterious for vigor <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> growth. If such <strong>an</strong><br />
expl<strong>an</strong>ation holds true to account for heterotic vigor in Fj hybrids^ it<br />
should be possible to accumulate favorable genes in inbreds, which<br />
should perform as well as the hybrid. However, the large number of<br />
genes involved in qu<strong>an</strong>titative characters such as in grain yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
linkage of deleterious recessive genes with favorable domin<strong>an</strong>t genes<br />
preclude the possibility of recovering homozygous lines as vigorous as<br />
the hybrid.
J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S.S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i 29<br />
î î î ,<br />
i-< m es<br />
rH rH<br />
T—1î<br />
i-l rH 00<br />
* t J<br />
V ) (N<br />
rH X~H<br />
î î ,<br />
CS O î<br />
x-H x-H os<br />
1<br />
X<br />
T i<br />
.S<br />
Ü<br />
O *VO *'©<br />
Ê *vo *a^ ’*00<br />
*iN *. LO -S'<br />
î *co<br />
0 0 i-i o<br />
*t-i *cs î<br />
Ï-H X—Í vo<br />
Í î<br />
VO v:t< Y<br />
* o î Í<br />
x-l t>. CO<br />
§<br />
0<br />
1 OJ c;<br />
0<br />
Oh<br />
1<br />
£<br />
*o*<br />
î î î<br />
i-i 00 -rP<br />
CO cr> fO<br />
î î ■î<br />
OV tW 1—l<br />
tH (N es<br />
á *co 'co *(S ' f Îh<br />
Ê<br />
Í t Í<br />
o\ 00 00 ^tr> e s CO<br />
î î î<br />
(Jv r-4 ,-t<br />
(S CO CO<br />
Í Í î<br />
Ov O' Os<br />
î , î<br />
T—1«<br />
t—( Œv t-H<br />
î î î<br />
-Vi< 00 V s<br />
tM tH cH<br />
l“ C CO<br />
1 1 1<br />
î i î<br />
m tn '(t*<br />
£<br />
ê<br />
•Í3<br />
en<br />
P<br />
g<br />
o<br />
T-H es T—Í<br />
^ ^ ^<br />
(N es ujl es es cc)<br />
'•S S<br />
I“ l T-1 CO (T) OJl rH rH cp rH o Y<br />
TJ<br />
•i3 VI<br />
ê<br />
-ê<br />
? :ôQLi<br />
(U<br />
ê<br />
-t<br />
g<br />
k > * , - .<br />
Uj \£) (N<br />
î î î<br />
in o\<br />
'X) LO (N<br />
î ä *<br />
i-< o Í<br />
o o r i<br />
t-H T—1 ÏS'<br />
: î<br />
o es lO<br />
CS eo<br />
Í î î<br />
tH 00 CO<br />
Tjl Tt'<br />
‘l>^ *LO o<br />
CS CO<br />
Vo *Lo Vs<br />
\ 0 ts. os<br />
î î Í ,<br />
S i ■n' CS<br />
T-l (S CS<br />
*'!l^ o *s#i<br />
LO lO CO<br />
t î î<br />
x-( lO CO<br />
in<br />
i : î<br />
os O X—1<br />
(OS Os 00<br />
t î î<br />
CS vO O<br />
rH<br />
*00 ‘lo *co<br />
CO CO CO<br />
'xH CO Ov<br />
(S CS es<br />
î î Í<br />
oo SP oo<br />
VD v5 I>.<br />
o "Ü* vo<br />
£<br />
in iN ^ eO rM LO ro c^ ^ x~i ^0<br />
! ç-<br />
-Ö<br />
fin<br />
S '<br />
Ê<br />
£<br />
w 00 ep CO CS \o<br />
1 r-<<br />
CO o es<br />
!<br />
tW Tifi t s<br />
1 1—'<br />
tH X—1 ^ (H o r#<br />
rH XH 1<br />
vo (3s<br />
T!l( UJl CJV<br />
■ÏÏ K w<br />
O nj<br />
iJ
30 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
homozygote for the same gene. If A1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> A2 are the two contrasting<br />
alleles for a single locus, the hétérozygote combination A1A2 is more<br />
favorable to the pl<strong>an</strong>t th<strong>an</strong> either of the homozygote combinations A1A1<br />
or A2A2, This phenomenon is called overdomin<strong>an</strong>ce. Overdomin<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
has been demonstrated in several traits that are controlled by a single<br />
gene (Berger, 1976). Heterosis c<strong>an</strong> result from partial to complete<br />
domin<strong>an</strong>ce, overdomin<strong>an</strong>ce, epistasis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a combination of these factors<br />
(Comstock <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Robinson, 1952). If partial to complete domin<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
predominates, it is theoretically possible to develop homozygotes with a<br />
perform<strong>an</strong>ce equal or superior to hybrids. However, if overdomin<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
type of epistasis predominates, then the highest-yielding lines must be<br />
heterozygotes (Sprague <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ebehart, 1977). Jinks (1983) observed<br />
inadequate evidence of genuine overdomin<strong>an</strong>ce for qu<strong>an</strong>titative<br />
characters <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> opined that apparent domin<strong>an</strong>ce due to non-allelic<br />
interaction <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> linkage disequilibrium was a common contributor to<br />
heterosis. It is therefore argued that in such situations recombin<strong>an</strong>t<br />
inbred lines as high yielding as or superior to Fj hybrids c<strong>an</strong> be<br />
developed provided appropriate <strong>breeding</strong> schemes are followed. Jinks,<br />
however, did not rule out the possibility of masking effects of a wide<br />
r<strong>an</strong>ge of incomplete or complete domin<strong>an</strong>ce at the individual loci<br />
including overdomin<strong>an</strong>ce at some. He concluded that such a situation<br />
would merely result in loss of accuracy in the prediction of the r<strong>an</strong>ge of<br />
pure <strong>breeding</strong> families extractable from heterotic cross. The best of these<br />
families would produce second cycle heterotic FjS, if they were crossed<br />
to <strong>an</strong>other family which carried alternative alleles at the loci displaying<br />
overdomin<strong>an</strong>ce. The genetic basis of the exploitation of heterotic rice<br />
hybrids in China <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> elsewhere c<strong>an</strong> be attributed to the aforesaid<br />
phenomenon as explained by Jinks.<br />
Although biometrical <strong>an</strong>alysis gives some insight into the relative<br />
import<strong>an</strong>ce of domin<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> overdomin<strong>an</strong>ce, such <strong>an</strong>alyses are not<br />
powerful enough to elucidate the role of overdomin<strong>an</strong>ce if it exists only<br />
for a reduced part of the set of loci in the qu<strong>an</strong>titative traits of interest<br />
(Gallis, 1988). It is difficult to establish conclusive proof for the genetic<br />
basis of heterosis for either of the hypotheses proposed because of the<br />
complexity of inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of qu<strong>an</strong>titative characters such as yield. All<br />
types of gene interactions both inter-<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> intra-allelic are probably<br />
involved. Gallis (1988) stated that heterozygosity for regulatory systems<br />
might be more signific<strong>an</strong>t for the expl<strong>an</strong>ation of heterosis. Heterozygosity<br />
for regulatory genes may lead to greater homeostasis in a variable<br />
environment <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> heterosis is the result of genotype x environment<br />
interaction <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> such a mech<strong>an</strong>ism will be a fundamental property at the<br />
dioloid level. Gallis fl988) observed that in both auto- <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> allogamous
J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S.S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i 31<br />
their studies observed a low correlation between marker heterozygosity<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> trait expression, indicating that the overall heterozygosity made<br />
little contribution to the heterosis. Their results provided strong<br />
evidence that epistasis played a major role for the expression of<br />
heterosis.<br />
Heterosis is a phenomenon of superior growth, development, differentiation<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> maturation caused by the interaction of genes, metabolism<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> environment. Therefore, a logical approach to explain heterosis<br />
would be to take into account the nuclear genome heterozygosity as well<br />
as the effect of cytoplasm. Several studies in rice have demonstrated the<br />
positive <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> negative effects of cytoplasm on agronomic as well as<br />
physiological characters (Maruyama et at, 1985; Sasahara et ah, 1986;<br />
Chen et ah, 1987; Young <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, 1990). W<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Wen (1995)<br />
studied the effect of sterility inducing cytoplasm in seven isogeneic<br />
alloplasmic male sterile lines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their maintainer, Lu-Hoongzao IB.<br />
They observed signific<strong>an</strong>t positive effects on spikelets/p<strong>an</strong>icles (CMS-K<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CMS-WA cytoplasm); signific<strong>an</strong>t effects on grain yield/p<strong>an</strong>icle<br />
(CMS-L, CMS-J, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CMS-WA cytoplasm); seed set percentage (CMS-L,<br />
CMS-J, CMS-Y, CMS-S, CMS-D, CMS-K <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CMS-WA cytoplasm); 1000<br />
grain weight (CMS-I, CMS-J, CMS-Y, CMS-S <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CMS-WA cytoplasm)<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> spikelets/p<strong>an</strong>icle (CMS-J cytoplasm).<br />
PREDICTION OF HETEROSIS<br />
Breeders are always interested in choosing parental lines which will<br />
result in a heterotic combination without making all the crosses possible<br />
among the potential parents. Several methods such as per se perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
of the parents, genetic diversity determined through geographic origin,<br />
multivariate <strong>an</strong>alysis using morphological <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> agronomic traits, isozyme<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> combining<br />
ability armlysis have been used to predict the best possible heterotic<br />
parental combination.<br />
In the hybrid rice <strong>breeding</strong> program's several internationally known<br />
commercial rice varieties <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> elite <strong>breeding</strong> lines have been used such as<br />
IR24, IR26, Mily<strong>an</strong>g46, IR661, IR9761-19-1R. Therefore, per se perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
is a basis for selecting parental lines for developing heterotic<br />
hybrids. However, it is also import<strong>an</strong>t that the parents selected to<br />
develop heterotic hybrids are adapted to the prevailing conditions for<br />
which hybrids are developed.<br />
The genetic basis of heterosis lies primarily in the inter allelic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>/<br />
or intra-allelic genetic differences among the parents. Therefore,
32 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
be related to the geographic origin of the parental lines. However,<br />
internationalization of pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>breeding</strong> efforts <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> massive exch<strong>an</strong>ge of<br />
unimproved <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> improved germplasm throughout the world may not<br />
always reflect the genetic diversity among parents of different geographic<br />
origin. On the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, extensive hybridization in several national <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
international <strong>breeding</strong> programs around the world has created vast<br />
genetic diversity among the lines developed under given geographic<br />
conditions <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one c<strong>an</strong> expect genetic diversity among parents from the<br />
same geographic origin.<br />
Biotechnological tools such as isozyme, RFLP <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om amplified<br />
polymorphic DNA (RAPD) are used to estimate genetic diversity among<br />
rice cultivars (Chu, 1967; Shahi et ai., 1969; Pai et ah, 1975; Fu <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pai,<br />
1979; Second, 1982; Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n, 1987; Mackill 1995). Isozyme<br />
polymorphism in parents <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hybrids in relation to heterosis for<br />
qu<strong>an</strong>titative traits has been studied by a number of <strong>research</strong>ers. Xiao<br />
(1981) Deng <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>g (1984); Yi et ah, (1984) have shown association of<br />
heterosis with a certain esterase peroxidase pattern in FjS. However,<br />
there was no association between the magnitude of heterosis in FjS <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
genetic diversity among parents as determined by polymorphism at six<br />
loci, viz. Est-9, Est-2, Amp-3, Sdh-1, Pgi-2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pgd-1 (Peng et ah, 1988).<br />
Conclusive evidence of relationship between RFLP studies <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic<br />
diversity in rice is lacking.<br />
Mahal<strong>an</strong>obis generalized dist<strong>an</strong>ce (D^ statistics) based multivariate<br />
<strong>an</strong>alysis (Mahal<strong>an</strong>obis, 1936) is used to estimate genetic diversity by<br />
classifying prospective parents of hybrids into various genetically diverse<br />
clusters. Parental lines belonging to dist<strong>an</strong>tly located clusters are more<br />
likely to give heterotic hybrids th<strong>an</strong> parental lines belonging to the same<br />
cluster. This technique has been used to classify rice cultivars by<br />
Julfiquar et ah (1985), Vaidy<strong>an</strong>ath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reddy (1985), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Li <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ang<br />
(1988), Li <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ang (1988) observed that p<strong>an</strong>icle, grain number <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
growth duration played a major role in estimating the genetic dist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
among parents. Inclusion complex traits such as yield may bias the<br />
estimation of genetic divergence (Julifquar et ah, 1985). Tropical<br />
japónicas or jav<strong>an</strong>ica rices are japónicas adapted to tropical conditions<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetically diverse from indica rices (Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n, 1987; Khush <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Acquino, 1994). In a study conducted at IRRI hybrids derived from<br />
indica/tropical japónica crosses were more heterotic th<strong>an</strong> hybrids<br />
derived from indica/indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tropical japónica/tropical japónica<br />
crosses (Table 2.7).<br />
Virm<strong>an</strong>i et ah (1991, 1994), on the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, observed a lower<br />
degree of heterosis in indica/temperate japónica crosses compared to<br />
crosses between indica/indica, implying that genetic diversity between
J.S, <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S.S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i 33<br />
Table 2.7<br />
Total biomass, grain yield, harvest index (HI), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 1000-grain weight<br />
of intervarietal <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> intravarietal group hybrids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their inbreds<br />
evaluated at IRRI, 1993 WS, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 1994 DS<br />
Group Nuniber Total biomass<br />
(g m'^)<br />
Grains HI 1000-grain<br />
wt (g)<br />
1993 WS (spacing 20 cm x 10 cm)<br />
TJ/I 3 1816a 890a 0.49a 31.0b<br />
I/I 5 1540b 710b 0,46b 28.0c<br />
TJ/TJ 5 1489b 643c 0,43c 32.6a<br />
I 9 1418b 603c 0.42c 26.3d<br />
TJ 8 1116c 412d 0.37d 28.8c<br />
1994 DS (spacing 15 cm x 10 cm)<br />
TJ/I 8 2047a 1030a 0.50a 28.1a<br />
I/I 8 1834b 894b 0.48b 27.0b<br />
TJ/TJ 8 1724bc 822c 0.48b 27.6b<br />
I 8 1651c 726d 0,44c 24.4c<br />
TJ 8 1453d 566e 0.39d 25.0c<br />
Source: Virm<strong>an</strong>i (1996),<br />
TJ, tropical japónica; I, indica.<br />
Data with suffix of same letter indicate that those data are not signific<strong>an</strong>tly different from<br />
each other.<br />
combinations. Hybrids between indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica rices show variable<br />
degrees of sterility. Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki (1984) suggested the use of wide<br />
compatibility gene(s) to overcome the hybrid sterility in indica/japónica<br />
hybrids. Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki (1984) showed that gamete abortion by <strong>an</strong><br />
allelic interaction at a locus (S5) caused hybrid sterility in S5i S5j but not<br />
in S5n S5i or S5n S5j; S5i, S5j <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S5n representing indica, japónica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
neutral allele respectively. Thus by incorporating the S5n allele into one<br />
of the parents, sterility may be overcome. The wide compatibility locus,<br />
S5n (WC) locus is closely linked with marker genes C (chromogen for<br />
pigmentation) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> wx (waxy endosperm) which are located on<br />
chromosome 6 (Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki, 1986, 1987). Subsequent to the<br />
findings of Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki (1984), a total of six loci, S-5, S-7, S-8, S-9,<br />
S-15 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S-16, located on chromosomes 6, 4, 6, 7,12 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 1 respectively,<br />
are known which c<strong>an</strong> cause hybrid sterility in intervarietal hybrids<br />
independent of each other <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for which neutral alleles WC genes have<br />
been identified in different rice cultivars (Y<strong>an</strong>agihara, et al., 1992; W<strong>an</strong>g<br />
et al, 1993). Virm<strong>an</strong>i (1996) has given a list of some WCVs identified<br />
with the S locus in Jap<strong>an</strong>, China <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IRRI (Table 2.8).<br />
Combining ability <strong>an</strong>alysis has been useful in identifying potential<br />
parents to produce heterotic hybrids. Generally speaking the probability<br />
of getting heterotic hybrids is high in parental lines having high general<br />
rnmViinmo- ahililv (GG A) flhidies Conducted at IRRI indicated that
34 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Table 2.8 Some WCVs identified in Jap<strong>an</strong>, China <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IRRI<br />
WCV cultivar Varietal group WC gene Reference<br />
Ket<strong>an</strong> N<strong>an</strong>gka TJ S5n Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki (1986)<br />
Calo toe TJ S5n Ikeháshi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki (1986)<br />
CP SLO 17 TJ S5n Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki (1986)<br />
NK 4a J S5n Araki et al. (1988)<br />
Norin PI 9a J S5n Arakai et al. (1990)<br />
B<strong>an</strong>ten TJ S7n Y<strong>an</strong>agihara et al. (1992)<br />
N22 Aus S5n, S7n Y<strong>an</strong>agihara et al. (1992)<br />
Dular Aus S5n, S7n Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki (1987);<br />
Vijayakumar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Virm<strong>an</strong>i (1993)<br />
Padi Buj<strong>an</strong>g Pendek TJ S5n Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki (1987)<br />
Aus 373 Aus S5n Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki (1987)<br />
DV 149 Aus . S5n Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki (1987)<br />
Kaladum<strong>an</strong>i Aus S5n Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki (1987)<br />
DV 52 Aus S5n Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki (1987)<br />
AS 35 Aus S5n Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki (1987)<br />
Lepudumai Aus S5n Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki (1987)<br />
0 2428 J S5n W<strong>an</strong>g ef al. (1991)<br />
TJ, Tropical japónica; J, japónica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> aus: <strong>Rice</strong> variety grown is the aus rice growing season<br />
in Bengal<br />
GCA effects (Peng <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, 1990), though sometimes heterotic<br />
combinations were obtained from parents having low GCA effects<br />
(Kumar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Saini, 1981). Srivastava <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Seshu (1983) reported that occasionally<br />
parents showing GCA did not result in heterotic combination.<br />
Apparently the prediction of heterotic combinations of parents c<strong>an</strong>not be<br />
made accurately based on combining ability studies alone.<br />
Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding Technology<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> is a self-pollinated crop. Therefore, use of <strong>an</strong> effective male sterility<br />
system to develop <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> produce hybrids in rice is imperative for the<br />
success of hybrid rice <strong>breeding</strong>. Cytoplasmic-genetic male sterility<br />
(CMS) system is extensively used in hybrid rice <strong>breeding</strong>. Recently,<br />
concerted efforts have been made to develop <strong>an</strong> environmentally<br />
sensitive genetic male sterility (EGMS) system <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its application in<br />
hybrid rice <strong>breeding</strong>. Apomixis, asexual seed production, a genetic tool<br />
for developing true <strong>breeding</strong> hybrids with perm<strong>an</strong>ently fixed heterosis<br />
has tremendous potential <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> needs sharp focus in the future <strong>research</strong><br />
strategy on hybrid rice.<br />
Cytoplasmic-Genetic Male Sterility (CMS)
I<br />
i<br />
J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S.S, Virm<strong>an</strong>i 35<br />
homozygotic recessive nuclear genes {rfrf) for fertility restoration <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
sterility inducing factor (S) in cytoplasm makes pl<strong>an</strong>ts male sterile. Thus,<br />
only S rfrf individuals are male sterile. Possible cytoplasmic-genetic<br />
constituents of pl<strong>an</strong>ts <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their pollen fertility behavior <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> accepted<br />
designations are: S rfrf (sterile, CMS), N rfrf (fertile maintainer), S /N<br />
RFRF ( fertile restorer), S Rfrf (fertile, hybrid). A CMS (A, line) is maintained<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> multiplied by crossing with its corresponding mdintainer (B,<br />
line). A cross of CMS <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a restorer (R) line results in a commercial<br />
hybrid.<br />
Based on the genetic behavior, the CMS lines are classified into two<br />
types, sporophytic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> gametophytic. In the sporophytic male sterility<br />
system, pollen sterility or fertility is determined by the genotype of the<br />
sporophyte, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the genotype of the grains has no effect per se. When<br />
tfie sporophyte genotype is S (rr), all the pollen grains will be abortive. If<br />
the genotype is N (RR) or S (RR), all the pollen grains will be fertile. When<br />
the sporophyte genotype is S (Rr), it produces two types of male gametes,<br />
S(R), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S(r), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> all the pollen grains are fertile. The CMS lines of WA<br />
type <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Gam type belong to the sporophytic type <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> have the following<br />
characteristic features;<br />
The F^ hybrid from the cross of A /R has normal pollen grains<br />
with normal fertility. Segregation in fertility will occur in F2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a<br />
certain proportion of male sterile pl<strong>an</strong>ts will appear in the<br />
population.<br />
• Abortion of pollen grains occurs at <strong>an</strong> earlier stage of microspore<br />
development. Most of the grains look wrinkled <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> irregular,<br />
• The <strong>an</strong>thers are milk-white in colour <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> water soaked <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
indéhiscent,<br />
• Male sterility is stable, but its restoring spectrum is relatively low.<br />
• The first internode from the top of the culm is shorter, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the basal<br />
part of the p<strong>an</strong>icles is enclosed in the flag leaf sheath to a varying<br />
degree.<br />
In the gametophytic male sterility system, fertility of the pollen<br />
grains is determined by the genotype of the gametophyte, viz, pollen.<br />
The nuclear gene R or r in the pollen results either in fertility or sterility<br />
respectively. The CMS lines, BT type, Ti<strong>an</strong> 1 type, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hong-Lien type<br />
belong to the gametophytic type <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> have the following features:<br />
• The Fi hybrid from the cross, A/R, has pollens of two genotypes,<br />
R <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> r, in equal proportion,<br />
• Pollen grains of genotype r are sterile.<br />
• Pollen abortion occurs at the later stage of microspore<br />
development.<br />
TT-io O f a cio n r1 or* <strong>an</strong>H i-nHi>tiicrpnt
36 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
• Its restoring spectrum is relatively broad.<br />
• P<strong>an</strong>icles are not enclosed in the sheath.<br />
Sampath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Moh<strong>an</strong>ty reported for the first time in 1954 the role of<br />
cytoplasm in causing male sterility in rice. However^ the first<br />
cytoplasmic male sterile line used in the development of commercial<br />
hybrids was developed in China in 1973 from a male sterile pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
occurring in a natural population of wild rice {Oryza sativa f spont<strong>an</strong>ea),<br />
(Yu<strong>an</strong>, 1977). The CMS pl<strong>an</strong>t was designated as wild rice with aborted<br />
pollen (WA). Since then a number of CMS lines have been developed in<br />
various program. Male sterility inducing cytoplasms were also<br />
identified in various geographic forms of O. perennis (Rutger <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Shinjyo, 1980). The frequency of male sterile cytoplasm in Asi<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Americ<strong>an</strong> strains was about 64% <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 4% respectively, Li <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zhu (1988)<br />
studied 300 strains of O. rufipogon <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> found 62 strains to possess male<br />
sterility inducing cytoplasm. In China most of the cytoplasmic male<br />
sterile lines have been primarily developed from the cytoplasmic source,<br />
viz. O. sativa /. spont<strong>an</strong>ea indica cultivars (Li <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zhu, 1988), although<br />
some japónica rices, Ke Qing 3, Zhaotong-Beizigu, Ma-zoou-gu <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
glaberrima D<strong>an</strong> botus were also donors of sterility-inducing cytoplasm.<br />
Yabuno (1977) identified three japónica cultivars; Akebono, Norin 19<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Omachi, to give cytoplasmic male sterile lines in combination with<br />
two accessions of O. glaberrima. Pradh<strong>an</strong> et al. (1990) identified two new<br />
CMS sources among indica cultivars, V20B <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sattari in crosses with<br />
japónica rices. V20B is the maintainer of CMS-WA cytoplasm but a<br />
source of sterile cytoplasm with japónica rice cultivar.<br />
Among the several CMS lines evaluated until 1996 for their stability<br />
of sterility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other desirable traits, only three lines, viz., IR58025A, IR<br />
62829A <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> PMS 3A were found to be commercially usable on a large<br />
scale. Even among these promising three CMS lines, IR 62829A has some<br />
problems of stability of male sterility at high temperature <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the outcrossing<br />
in PMS 3A is observed to be low. Therefore, there is only one<br />
reliable CMS line, IR 58025A, which has been used extensively for the<br />
development of commercial rice hybrids. During the past two years some<br />
other commercially usable CMS lines have been developed at IRRI.<br />
Extensive use of <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> dependence on a unitary source of sterilityinducing<br />
cytoplasm may lead to a sudden outbreak of pest <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> diseases<br />
as in the case of corn. In pearl millet the evidence was only empirical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
not conclusive. Hence, serious efforts are made for the diversification of<br />
the source of male sterility cytoplasm. Several interspecific crosses<br />
involving cultivated O. sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> closely related wild/weedy species of<br />
A genome (O. rufipogon, O. nivara, O. barthii, O. glaberrima <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
n rc .i-rT rv i-i-n ii4 -/i\ Ci.NQ,.>Í£»o r ^ o c o i s o o i - n r y o t o f i l i a r " i r f r » r a l C I Y I
J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S.S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i 37<br />
the Afric<strong>an</strong> species studied was found to possess sterile cytoplasm. In all<br />
six male sterility sources were developed which contained the sterile<br />
cytoplasm of either O. rufipogon or O. nivara (Table 2.9).<br />
Table 2,9<br />
Characteristics oi newly identified alternate CMS sources<br />
Code Source Type of sterility Restorers Maintainers<br />
RPMSl O. rufipogon Gametophytic Nil IR66,IR70, PMS 2B,V20 B<br />
RPMS2 0. nivara Gametophytic Nil IR66, IR70<br />
RPMS3 O. nivara Stained pollen IRBB7 PMS2E,IR62829B<br />
(MS 577A-like)<br />
RPMS4 0. nivara Sporophytic Nil IR66,PMS2B<br />
RPMS5 0. nivara Sporophytic IRBB7 PMS2B, IR 62829 B<br />
IR 66,1R70<br />
RPMS6 0. nivara Sporophytic 1RBB7 PMS 2B,IR 62829 B<br />
IR 66,IR 7<br />
Source: Siddiq et. ui., 1996.<br />
Of the six sources identified, three were found to be differ from the<br />
WA system based on restoration response <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pollen stainability.<br />
Among these three, two are gametophytic types <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one is sporophytic.<br />
Of the remaining three sources, one is similar to MS 577A, while the<br />
other two resemble the WA type with respect to restoration <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
mainten<strong>an</strong>ce reaction.<br />
During the past two decades about 20 CMS sources have been<br />
identified. However, the WA source is predomin<strong>an</strong>tly used in the<br />
production of commercial hybrids. Some of the recently identified<br />
sources include CMS-ARC, O. perenniSf IR66707A (Dalmacio et ah, 1995),<br />
O. ghimaepatitla, IR69700A ( Dalmacio et al., 1996) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> gamma ray<br />
induced mut<strong>an</strong>t from IR62829 B (IRRI, 1995). Pradh<strong>an</strong> et al. (1990a)<br />
identified two new sources, V20B <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sattari, through indica/japónica<br />
hybridization. V20B is a maintainer of CMS-WA source but itself was<br />
found to be a source of CMS with japónica cultivar Zhunghua-1 (Pradh<strong>an</strong><br />
et al, 1990b). More recently, two CMS sources from O. rufipogon <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
one from O. nivara were identified. These are designated as RPMS-1<br />
(0. rufipogon), RPMS-2 (O. nivara) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> RPMS-4 (O. rufipogon). Six CMS<br />
lines have been developed from these sources (Table 2.10). These CMS<br />
lines are highly stable except RPMS-2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> p<strong>an</strong>icle exertion is almost<br />
complete, unlike the WA source. However, no restorers have been<br />
identified from the cultivated germplasm for these lines.<br />
Two CMS lines, Pushpa A <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> M<strong>an</strong>gla A, are available with MS577A<br />
cytoplasm derived from O. rufipogon. However, these lines do not<br />
possess good agronomic traits <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> floral characteristics.<br />
With the intensification of <strong>research</strong> on hybrid rice, a number of
have been classified based on genetic behavior, relation between<br />
restorers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> maintainers, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the morphology of sterile pollen grains<br />
(Yu<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fu, 1996).<br />
According to the relationship of the restorer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> maintainer lines,<br />
the CMS lines may be classified into three groups. Group I is<br />
representable by WA type, group II by Hong-Lien type <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> group III by<br />
the BT type. The frequency of obtaining maintainer lines for the WA<br />
type is high in early maturing dwarf indica varieties cultivated in China,<br />
but low in IRRI lines. However, the frequency of obtaining restorer lines<br />
is high in IRRI lines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> varieties originating from Southeast Asia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
southern part of China.<br />
CMS lines of the Hong-Lien type are developed by backcrossing<br />
red-awned wild rice as the female parent with the recurrent male parent<br />
Li<strong>an</strong>-T<strong>an</strong>g-Zao. The relationship between restorers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> maintainers of<br />
the Hong-Lien type is roughly contrary to that observed in the WA type.<br />
Some early maturing dwarf indica varieties such as Zhen-Sh<strong>an</strong> 97, ER-<br />
Jiu-Ai <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xi<strong>an</strong>-Feng 1, which are maintainers for WA CMS lines, are<br />
restorers for Hong-Lien CMS lines. On the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, some restorers of<br />
WA CMS lines such as Peta, Tai-Ying 1, Indonesia 6 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xue-Gu-Zao,<br />
are good maintainers of Hong-Lien CMS lines. M<strong>an</strong>y IRRI lines, such as<br />
IR24, IR26 etc. partially restore fertility in the Hong-Lien type.<br />
The relation between restorers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> maintainers for the CMS lines<br />
developed by using the cytoplasm of Ti<strong>an</strong>-Ji-Du, e.g. Ti<strong>an</strong>-Ai A, is<br />
similar to that of the Hong-Lien type.<br />
The CMS lines Taichung 65, some japónica CMS lines such as Li-<br />
Ming <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Feng-Jin with sterile cytoplasm tr<strong>an</strong>sferred from BT <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CMS<br />
lines of japónica rice Ti<strong>an</strong> 1, belong to this type. Most of the japónica<br />
varieties from Jap<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> China are good maintainers for the BT type<br />
CMS line. The restorer eenes in the existine restorer lines of iaoonica rice<br />
38 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Table 2.10<br />
Desirable features of the new CMS lines possessing alternate<br />
sources of male sterility<br />
CMS line<br />
Stigma exsertion<br />
(%)<br />
P<strong>an</strong>icle exsertion<br />
(%)<br />
Outcrossing<br />
(%)<br />
Male sterility<br />
(%)<br />
RPMS 1-1 40.56 99.5 35.5 S<br />
RPMSl-2 38.60 96.5 28.5 S<br />
RPMSl-3 42.50 98.6 30.5 s<br />
RPMSl-4 46.46 99.5 35.5 s<br />
RPMS 2 42.40 98.6 34.2 US<br />
RPMS 4 39.46 98.9 31.6 s<br />
S, Stable; US, unstable.<br />
Source', Siddiqei ah, 1996.
To develop rice hybrids, it is necessary to have effective restorer lines.<br />
J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S.S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i 39<br />
from sporogenous cells results in male sterility of the pollen-free type/<br />
whereas failure in the mech<strong>an</strong>ism during microspore development <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
pollen maturation results in various types of pollen abortion.<br />
Classification of CMS lines based on the morphology of pollen grains<br />
stained with I-KI solution falls into the following categories:<br />
• Typical abortion type: The pollen grains are irregular in shape<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> not stainable with I-KI solution. Pollen abortion occurs<br />
relatively early^ mainly at the single nucleus stage. It is called the<br />
uninucleate abortion type. Most CMS lines of the WA type belong<br />
to this type.<br />
• Spherical abortion type: The pollen grains are spherical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> not<br />
stainable with I-KI solution. Pollen abortion occurs approximately<br />
at the two-nuclei stage. This type is called the binucleate abortion<br />
type. CMS lines of the Hong-Lien type belong to this category.<br />
• Stained abortion type: Pollen grains are spherical^ but much<br />
smaller compared to the normal pollen^ partially or lightly stained<br />
with I-Kl solution. Pollen abortion takes place at the three-nuclei<br />
stage. This type is called die trinucleate type. CMS lines of the BT<br />
type belong to this category.<br />
Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shinjyo (1988) proposed <strong>an</strong> interim designation for the<br />
various cytoplasmic sources known to induce male sterility. The CMS<br />
sources are designated in principle according to the name of the cultivar<br />
from which the cytoplasmic factor inducing male sterility is derived<br />
(Table 2.11).<br />
Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shinjyo (1988) also proposed a model for the<br />
identification of genetic differences among cytoplasm <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> restoring<br />
genes, which involves the development of CMS lines possessing<br />
different cytoplasm <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their restorer lines in <strong>an</strong> isogenic genetic<br />
background by recurrent backcrossing. These lines are then intercrossed<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their Fj pl<strong>an</strong>ts are evaluated for pollen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> spikelet fertility. If the Fj<br />
shows differential reaction to different Ri genes, the cytoplasm is<br />
considered different. To determine the allelic relationship among<br />
different Rf genes, two different restorer lines (cms-A Rfl Rfl <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cms-B<br />
Rf2 Rf2) are intercrossed; their Fj (cms-Afl Rf2) is pollinated by the<br />
maintainer having no restorer genes (N-rfl rfl <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>/or N-rf2 rf2) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
backcross progeny is evaluated for pollen fertility. The segregation<br />
pattern of the backcross progeny would indicate whether the Rf genes<br />
are allelic or non-allelic.<br />
Fertility Restoration
The frequency is also higher among indica rices compared to japónicas.<br />
Li <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zhu (1988) observed that among the three ecotypic rice cultivarse<br />
40 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Table 2.11 Male-sterile cytoplasm, its sources <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> designation<br />
Cytoplasm Strain Nuclear donor Reference Interim<br />
donor<br />
designation<br />
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)<br />
0. sativa Chinsurah boro II Taichung 65 Shinjyo <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Omura, 1966a cms-bo<br />
0. sativa Lead rice Fujiska 5 Watnabe et al., 1968 cms-ld<br />
0. sativa Taduk<strong>an</strong> NorinS Kitamura, 1962a cms-TA<br />
O. sativa Chinese strain Fujusaka Katsuo <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
f. spont<strong>an</strong>ea Mizushima, 1958 cmsCW<br />
0. sativa Wild abortive Several Lin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>Yu<strong>an</strong>, 1980 cmsWA<br />
f. spont<strong>an</strong>ea<br />
0. sativa Red-awned wild Lien- Lin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yu<strong>an</strong>, 1980 cmsHL<br />
f, spont<strong>an</strong>ea Tong-Tsao<br />
O. sativa Akebono 0 . glaberrima Yabimo, 1977 . cms-ak<br />
O, rufipogon W 1080 (India) Taichung 65 Shinjyo ef«/., 1981 cmsWlS<br />
0. rufipogon W 1090 (India) Taichung 65 Shinjyo <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Matomura, cmsW19<br />
1981<br />
0, rufipogon KR7 Taichung 65 Cheng <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hu<strong>an</strong>g, 1979 cmsKR<br />
0. sativa<br />
f. spont<strong>an</strong>ea YaChe Gu<strong>an</strong>g Xu<strong>an</strong> 3 Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsYC<br />
0. sativa Ti<strong>an</strong> Dong Zhen Sh<strong>an</strong> 97 Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsTD<br />
0. sativa Lie Zhou Zhen Sh<strong>an</strong> 97 Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsLZ<br />
0. sativa Indi<strong>an</strong> Jin N<strong>an</strong> Te 43 Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsIN<br />
0, sativa Dong Pu JinN<strong>an</strong> Te43 Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsDP<br />
O. sativa JunNiya Chao Y<strong>an</strong>g 1 Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsJNY<br />
0. sativa HePu Li Ming Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsHP<br />
0. sativa Teng Qiao Er-Jing-Qing Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsTQ<br />
0. sativa S<strong>an</strong> Ya Jing Yin 1 Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsSY<br />
0. sativa Rao Ping 6964 Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsRP<br />
0. sativa Gu<strong>an</strong>gzhou 6964 Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsGZ<br />
0, sativa Dwarf aborted Xue Qin Zhao Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsDA<br />
0, sativa Taichung Nativel P<strong>an</strong>khari 203 Athwal <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, 1972 cmsTN<br />
O. sativa Gamibiaca Chao Y<strong>an</strong>g 1 etc. Lin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yu<strong>an</strong>, 1980 msGAM<br />
0. sativa BircofPI 279120) Calrose Erickson, 1969 msBI<br />
0. sativa ARC 13728-16 IR101179-2-3-1 IRRI, 1986 cmsARC<br />
O. sativa Esh<strong>an</strong> Ta Bei Cu Hong Mao Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsSTB<br />
Ying<br />
0. sativa Ti<strong>an</strong> Ji Du Fujisawa 5 Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsTJD<br />
0, sativa IR24 Xiu Ling Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsIR24<br />
0. sativa Jing Chu<strong>an</strong> Nao N<strong>an</strong>Tai Geng Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsJCN<br />
0. sativa ShengQi Nong Ken 8 Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsSQ<br />
0> sativa Li Up Jing Yin 83 Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsLU<br />
0. sativa Zhao Jin Feng L<strong>an</strong> Bery Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsZJF<br />
0. sativa Zhao Tong BeiKe Ching 3 Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cihsZTB<br />
0. sativa Dissi Hatif Zhen Sh<strong>an</strong> 97 Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, 1988 cmsDIS
J. s. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S.S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i 41<br />
cultivars. Bulu <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tjerehh cultivated in Java, Indonesia, Tjereh<br />
cultivars had a higher frequency of restorers. Bulu rices while showed<br />
weak restoration. In Asia, restorers were found mainly in South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Southeast Asi<strong>an</strong> countries <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in southern China.<br />
The <strong>genetics</strong> of fertility restoration has been studied by several<br />
workers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> was recently reviewed by Virm<strong>an</strong>i (1996). The effect of<br />
restorer gene(s) for CMS-bo <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CMS-D cytoplasm was gametophytic<br />
causing partial pollen fertility, but normal spikelet fertility in Fj hybrids.<br />
On the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, the effect of restorer gene for CMS-WA cytoplasm was<br />
sporophytic which gave normal pollen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> spikelet fertility in Fj<br />
hybrids. The inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of fertility restoration in CMS-bo <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CMS-D<br />
cytoplasm was monogenic domin<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the two genes were allelic (Hu<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Li, 1985). Teng <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shen (1994) reported that the fertility restoration<br />
for CMS-bo was controlled by a domin<strong>an</strong>t gene RF-1 carried in the<br />
restorer line C57, or by <strong>an</strong> incompletely domin<strong>an</strong>t gene in Z H 157 which<br />
was diffefent from RF-1. W<strong>an</strong>g (1980) reported a single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene<br />
restoring fertility in cytosterile Zhen Sh<strong>an</strong> 97A, whereas all other studies<br />
indicated that the fertility restoration was controlled by two domin<strong>an</strong>t<br />
genes (Govindraj <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, 1988; Teng <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shen, 1994) with<br />
sporophytic effect <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that one of the genes had a stronger effect th<strong>an</strong> the<br />
other. Li (1985) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Li <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yu<strong>an</strong> (1986) reported that of the two restorer<br />
genes of IR24, one gene, RlR l, might have been inherited from a late<br />
indica variety from China, while the other, R2R2, from SLO 17. The two<br />
genes showed differential effects in their strength for restoration ability.<br />
The allelic test of restorer genes, present in six restorer varieties; (IR26,<br />
IR36, IR54, IR9761-19-1, IR2707-105-2-2-3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR42) indicated the<br />
presence of four groups of restorers possessing different pairs of restorer<br />
genes (Govindraj <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, 1988). These authors suggested that the<br />
probable sources of R genes in two popular varieties, IR36 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR42 are<br />
Cina, Latisail, Taduk<strong>an</strong>, TN1, TKM 6, PTB18, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> SLO 17. The existence<br />
of a large number of restorer ¡genes explains the high frequency of R lines<br />
among the elite indica <strong>breeding</strong> lines for the CMS-WA cytosterile system.<br />
Shinjyo (1975) located the Rf gene fcir CMS-bo cytoplasm on<br />
chromosome C, presently designated as chromosome 10 using trisomie<br />
<strong>an</strong>alysis. Yoshimura et al. (1982) located the Rf gene for CMS-bo<br />
cytoplasm on chromosome 7 using the tr<strong>an</strong>slocation inethod. Shinjyo <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Sato (1994) also located the restorer gene (Rf-2) for CMS-L cytoplasm on<br />
chromosome 2 using primary trisomie <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> linkage tester lines. Bharaj et<br />
al. (1995) using trisomie <strong>an</strong>alysis located the stronger restorer gene (Rf-<br />
WA-1) for CMS-WA cytoplasm on chromosome 7, while the weaker<br />
gene (Rf-WA~2) was located on chromosome 10. Shinjyo (1975) reported
42 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
G enetic M ale Sterility<br />
The cytoplasmic-genetic male sterility system is extensively used in the<br />
production of commercial rice hybrids. It is a three-line system involving<br />
a CMS source, a maintainer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a restorer. It is <strong>an</strong> effective system.<br />
However, there are some drawbacks, such as the sources of developing<br />
new CMS lines are rather limited <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> poor. Presently the WA type of<br />
CMS system is extensively used. The unitary cytosterility system<br />
associated with the narrow genetic base poses latent d<strong>an</strong>ger of<br />
susceptibility to d<strong>an</strong>gerous diseases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insect pests. In the long run this<br />
may bring about serious crop losses. Moreover, the sterility of japónica<br />
CMS lines (BT type) now used to produce japónica rice hybrids is not<br />
stable enough to produce pure seeds.<br />
Shi (1981) reported that Shi Ming Song found a male sterile pl<strong>an</strong>t in<br />
the field of a japónica rice cultivar Nong-ken 58 in Hubei province, China.<br />
It behaved is a male sterile when pl<strong>an</strong>ts headed under long daylength,<br />
but a male fertile under short daylength. The degree of male sterility<br />
was 99-100% at heading under artificial light of more th<strong>an</strong> 14 h, but<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts were male fertile when grown under artificial light of less th<strong>an</strong> 13<br />
h 45 min. (Lu <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>g, 1988). It was called Hubei-photoperiodsensitive<br />
genetic male sterile rice. Y<strong>an</strong>g et al (1989) induced *a<br />
photoperiod-sensitive genetic male sterile (PGMS) line (5460) in indica<br />
rice IR54. Subsequehtly, temperature-sensitive genetic male sterility<br />
(TGMS) was also reported (Zhou et al., 1988, 1991; Wu et at, 1991;<br />
Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Voc, 1991).<br />
Several PGMS <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> TGMS lines have been developed in China,<br />
Jap<strong>an</strong>, the USA <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> by IRRI (Table 2.12). Satynaray<strong>an</strong>a et al (1995)<br />
reported a new source of the TGMS line in India among spont<strong>an</strong>eously<br />
occurring sterile pl<strong>an</strong>ts from indica cultivar lET 10726. Orad <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hu<br />
(1995) used ethylmeth<strong>an</strong>e sulfonate to induce PGMS in rice cultivar<br />
M201. PGMS lines Nongken 58S <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> X-88 are completely pollen under<br />
long day (day length below 13.75 h). TGMS lines show complete pollen<br />
sterility when the maximum temperature during the day is above 27-<br />
29°C <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> partially fertile when the maximum day temperature is lower<br />
th<strong>an</strong> 27“C. However, the critical temperature has been found to vary<br />
depending on the source of the TGMS gene (Lu et al, 1994).<br />
Both PGMS <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> TGMS are referred to as environment sensitive<br />
male sterile (EGMS) mut<strong>an</strong>ts. W<strong>an</strong>g et al (1991a, b) Maruyama et al,<br />
(1991), Borkakati <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i (1989) reported both TGMS <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> PGMS to<br />
be monogervic recessive traits. Sun et al (1989) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Maruyama et al.<br />
(1991) designated the TGMS genes as tmsl <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> iws2, respectively.<br />
Borkakati <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>. Virm<strong>an</strong>i (1996) reported that the two TGMS mut<strong>an</strong>ts,
The TGMS gene in Norin PL12 has been designated as tms2 (Kinoshita<br />
1992). The TGMS gene in the mut<strong>an</strong>t IR32364TGMS is designated as<br />
fms3.<br />
The PGMS <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> TGMS lines are currently used to develop two-line<br />
rice hybrids. This system gives higher frequency of heterotic hybrids<br />
compared to the CMS system because of limited restrictions in the choice<br />
of parents. In China, about 11 usable S lines (2 japónica PGMS <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 9<br />
indica TGMS) have been developed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> registered <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 5 two-line hybrid<br />
rice varieties have been released for cultivation. The area under two-line<br />
hybrid rice varieties in China two increased from 60,000 ha in 1994 to<br />
about 330,000 ha in 1996 (Tr<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nguyen, 1998), The two-line hybrid<br />
varieties have a yield adv<strong>an</strong>tage of 5-10 % higher th<strong>an</strong> the commercially<br />
cultivated three-line hybrid varieties.<br />
The PGMS system is useful in temperate regions where the<br />
daylength differences during the rice-growing season are striking. The<br />
TGMS system, on the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, is useful under tropical conditions,<br />
where the daylength differences are marginal, while the temperature<br />
differences between high <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> low altitude are considerable.<br />
€<br />
J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S.S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i 43<br />
Table 2.12<br />
Some of the PGMS <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> TGMS lines developed in China,<br />
Jap<strong>an</strong>, the USA <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IRRI<br />
Une<br />
Varietal<br />
group<br />
Developed<br />
by<br />
Developed<br />
at<br />
Type<br />
Fertility induction<br />
conditions<br />
NongkenSSS J Spont<strong>an</strong>eous<br />
mutation<br />
China EGMS Daylength lovi^er th<strong>an</strong><br />
13.75 h<br />
Anong S I Spont<strong>an</strong>eous China TGMS Temperature 27'*C<br />
mutation<br />
Hennong S I Cross<strong>breeding</strong><br />
China TGMS Temperature<br />
below 29“C<br />
5460 S I Irradiation China TGMS Temperature<br />
below 29“C<br />
R59T S<br />
I Irradiation China TGMS Temperature<br />
below 29“C<br />
IR32364-20-1-3-2B<br />
I Irradiation IRRI TGMS Temperature<br />
below 29“C<br />
Norin PL 12 J Irradiation Jap<strong>an</strong> TGMS Temperature<br />
below 28“C<br />
IVA I Cross<strong>breeding</strong><br />
China TGMS Temperature<br />
below 24“C<br />
Di<strong>an</strong>xin lA J CMS China TGMS Temperature<br />
below 22®C<br />
EGMS J USA PGMS Daylength
44 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
APOMIXIS<br />
Apomixis is <strong>an</strong> asexual method of reproduction in which the embryo<br />
(seed) develops without the union of male <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> female gametes. It<br />
bypasses meiosis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> syngamy in the female gametophyte to produce<br />
embryos genetically identical to the maternal parent. Apomixis is the<br />
genetic tool to develop true <strong>breeding</strong> rice hybrids. The application of<br />
apomixis in rice would enable farmers to use the harvest of a hybrid crop<br />
as seed for the subsequent hybrid crop without experiencing genetic<br />
segregation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in<strong>breeding</strong> depression. Therefore, it will enable even the<br />
resource-poor farmers to benefit from hybrid rice.<br />
The indicators of apomixis are:<br />
• Identical maternal progeny from pl<strong>an</strong>ts of cross-pollinated species<br />
or progeny of Fi crosses.<br />
• Limited or no genetic variation in the F2 population of a cross<br />
between two distinct parents.<br />
• Recessive genotypes from a cross of parents with recessive genes<br />
pollinated with a parent possessing a domin<strong>an</strong>t marker gene.<br />
• Unusual high seed fertility in <strong>an</strong>euploids, triploids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> wide<br />
crosses normally expected to be sterile.<br />
• Aneuploid chromosome number or structural heterozygosity<br />
remaining consistent from parents to progeny.<br />
• Multiple seedlings per seed, multiple stigmas, multiple ovules per<br />
floret <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> doubled or fused ovaries.<br />
There are reports of mut<strong>an</strong>ts in rice with twin seedlings per seed<br />
(Yu<strong>an</strong> et al, 1990; Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, 1990) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> multiple pistillate<br />
ovaries (Suh, 1985,1988). Occurrence of apomixis in interspecific crosses<br />
in rice has been reported from China (Chen et al., 1988), But, the<br />
authenticity of this report has yet to be confirmed.<br />
The potential of apomixis in the commercial exploitation of heterosis<br />
in rice bears great promise, Khush <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Gquino (1994) have suggested<br />
three strategies to intensify the search for apomixis in rice. These include:<br />
• Analysis of the tetraploid wild germplasm of Oryza.<br />
• Induction of mutations for apomixis.<br />
• Use of molecular approaches to engineer apomixis.<br />
BIOTECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS<br />
Recent adv<strong>an</strong>ces in biotechnology have opened new avenues in hybrid<br />
rice <strong>breeding</strong>. Brar et al. (1994) have outlined several applications of<br />
ciirh afi <strong>an</strong>ther culture, embrvo rescue, protoplast fusion.
Table 2.13<br />
Application of biotechnology in hybrid rice'<br />
Technique<br />
Anther culture<br />
Embryo rescue<br />
Protoplast fusion line<br />
o p ia tic einbryogenesis<br />
Molecular markers<br />
Genetic tr<strong>an</strong>sformation<br />
Applications<br />
Extraction of high-yielding inbred lines from 'superior<br />
hybrids, purification of male sterile, maintainer arid restorer<br />
lines.<br />
'<br />
Overcoming incompatibility to produce hybrids between<br />
wild <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cultivated species, Deriving back-cross progenies to<br />
develop alloplasmic lines for diversification of CMS sources,<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of genes for apomixis from wild species into elite<br />
<strong>breeding</strong> lines.<br />
Expeditious tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of CMS into elite <strong>breeding</strong>, development<br />
of cybrids between otherwise sexually incompatible species.<br />
Production of artificial seeds for mass propagation of true<br />
<strong>breeding</strong> hybrid varieties.<br />
Tagging genes for wide compatibility, fertility restoratiôn,<br />
thermosensitive male sterility, apomixis, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> identifying<br />
QTLs for heterosis to facilitate marker-based selection;<br />
choosing parents based on RPLP diversity to obtain highly<br />
heterotic combinations.<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of cloned genes governing apomixis for producing<br />
true <strong>breeding</strong> commercial hybrids; exploitation of genetically<br />
engineered nuclear male sterility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fertility restoration<br />
systems to produce hybrid varieties.<br />
FUTURE OUTLOOK<br />
The development of semidwarf varieties of rice in the 1960s led to<br />
signific<strong>an</strong>t increases in the yield of rice. The yield potential of semidwarf<br />
high-yielding varieties in the tropics is 10 tha'^ during the dry season<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 6.5 tha'^ during the wet season. The maximum yield potential was<br />
estimated to be 9.5 tha'^ during the wet season <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 15.9 tha'^ during the<br />
dry season (Yoshida, 1981). Since the development of semidwarf<br />
varieties, however, there has been little improvement in the yield<br />
potential of rice. Major efforts in the past three decades have been<br />
towards the incorporation of disease <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insect resist<strong>an</strong>ce, shortening of<br />
growth duration <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> improvement in grain quality (Khush, 1994).<br />
Exploitation of heterosis through hybrid rice <strong>breeding</strong> has offered a<br />
potential venue for increasing rice yield. China has made remarkable<br />
progress in the exploitation of hybrid rice-<strong>breeding</strong> technology to boost<br />
rice production.<br />
Realization of the potential of hybrid rice technology is greater in<br />
countries with a higher proportion of irrigated rice area, a high l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>:<br />
labor ratio <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> under tr<strong>an</strong>spl<strong>an</strong>ting conditions where the seed
46 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> where rice is direct seeded if, yields of hybrid seed were around 3<br />
tons <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> above per hectare <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the seed cost reduced.<br />
The current level of heterosis in indica rice hybrids is around 15-<br />
20%. However, a higher level of heterosis is desirable. The magnitude of<br />
heterosis depends upon the genetic diversity between the two parents of<br />
the hybrid. In the last three decades, the genetic diversity among the<br />
improved indica rices has narrowed because of the massive international<br />
exch<strong>an</strong>ge of germplasm. However, there has been little gene flow<br />
between indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica rices <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> these two races of rice have<br />
remained distinct. A higher level of heterosis has been observed in<br />
hybrids between indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tropical japónica for yield th<strong>an</strong> indicaindica<br />
hybrids. However, this would require tackling associated<br />
problems such as intervarietal hybrid sterility, lodging, late maturity<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grain quality. Deployment of wide compatibility genes in <strong>breeding</strong><br />
indica/japónica hybrid is essential. Tagging of WC genes with molecular<br />
markers to assist in marker-aided selection for this trait would be very<br />
useful. <strong>Rice</strong> hybrids with the desired disease <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insect resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
acceptable grain quality c<strong>an</strong> be developed by <strong>an</strong> appropriate choice of<br />
parental lines.<br />
The CMS system has been successfully used in the development of<br />
rice hybrids. Though several CMS sources have been identified, only a<br />
few have been commercially exploited. It is very essential to genetically<br />
diversify the CMS sources to avert possible incidences of disease <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
insect epidemics. There is no dearth of restorers among the elite indica<br />
rice cultivars. However, the restorers among the japónica rices are scarce.<br />
It would be useful for the japónica rice hybrid program to find a new<br />
CMS source for which sufficient restorers are available. The efficiency of<br />
<strong>breeding</strong> of maintainer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> restorer lines in indica rice c<strong>an</strong> be accelerated<br />
by developing genetically diverse maintainer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> restorer populations<br />
using male sterility-facilitated recurrent selection (Virm<strong>an</strong>i et al, 1994).<br />
Protoplast culture in ricé makes it possible to produce cybrids which<br />
enable immediate tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of cytoplasmic male sterility into elite rice<br />
cultivars (Akagi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> FujimUra, 1994; Brar ef al, 1994). This approach<br />
needs to be explored to develop genetically diverse CMS lines<br />
expeditiously.<br />
The varieties developed during the past few decades have made a<br />
signific<strong>an</strong>t impact in the favorable environment. Signific<strong>an</strong>t heterosis<br />
observed for vegetative vigor <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> root characteristics suggests that<br />
hybrid rice technology may have a potential in abiotic stress<br />
environments (rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, flood-prone, drought-prone, low
J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S.S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i<br />
rice. Hybrid seed yields up to 5.8 tha'^ have been reported in China <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
up to 2.5 tha'^ have been reported in other countries. Strategies such as<br />
genetic improvement for flowering behavior of seed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pollen parents<br />
(selection seed parents with long, exserted stigma, longer duration <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
wider <strong>an</strong>gle of floret opening, small <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> horizontal leaves, selection of<br />
pollen parents with high percentage of residual pollen per <strong>an</strong>ther after<br />
exsertion, high pollen shedding potential through increasing number of<br />
blooming spikelets per unit area) have to be vigorously perused.<br />
Incorporation of elongated uppermost internode gene in male sterile<br />
lines would be useful in improving p<strong>an</strong>icle exsertion which would<br />
eliminate the application of GA3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reduce the cost of seed production.<br />
The success story of hybrid rice in China has established beyond<br />
doubt that hybrid rice technology has the potential to boost rice<br />
production. However, the major constraints for its adoption are:<br />
• need to buy fresh hybrid seed every pl<strong>an</strong>ting season;<br />
• high cost of hybrid seed;<br />
• need to establish seed production infrastructure in developing<br />
countries.<br />
Farmers will buy hybrid seed at a price higher th<strong>an</strong> that of inbred<br />
seed only if there is a cost: benefit ratio of 1 ; 4 (Khush, 1994). This will<br />
encourage investment by the government, private <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cooperative<br />
org<strong>an</strong>izations in the seed industry.<br />
Discoloration of hybrid seeds is a major problem. In China <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
northwestern India, CMS lines in hybrid seed production plots have been<br />
found to have a higher incidence of seed-borne diseases such as paddy<br />
bunt <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> false smut compared to pollen parents. This not only<br />
deteriorates the quality of the seed, but c<strong>an</strong> also cause serious outbreak of<br />
the disease in commercial crops of hybrid rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> therefore needs serious<br />
attention.<br />
Apomixis is the ultimate genetic tool to develop true <strong>breeding</strong><br />
hybrids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> facilitate commercial exploitation of heterosis. Through<br />
apomixis, heterosis c<strong>an</strong> be perm<strong>an</strong>ently fixed. Farmers need not purchase<br />
hybrid seed every year provided apomixis is successfully incorporated in<br />
the hybrids. Research efforts in the exploration of apomixis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its<br />
incorporation in the hybrid rice development technology need to be<br />
intensified.<br />
References<br />
Akagi, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fujimora, T. 1994. CMS Tr<strong>an</strong>sfer in japónica varieties with cybrid method In:<br />
Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong> Technolosiy: New Developments,<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Future Prospects S.S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i (ed.) IRRI,
48 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Akita'/ S. 1988. Physiological basis of heterosis in rice. In; '‘Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong>/' pp. 67-77. IRRI,<br />
M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines.<br />
Araki, H., Ikehashi, H., Toya, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Matsumoto, S. 1990. Development of wide compatibility<br />
rice line Norin PL 9. }pn. Agrie. Res. Q, 24: 78-81.<br />
Araki, H., Toya, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, H. 1988. Role of wide compatibility genes in hybrid rice<br />
<strong>breeding</strong>. In; Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong>, pp. 79-83. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines.<br />
Athwal, D. S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S. S. 1972. Cytoplasmic male sterility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hybrid <strong>breeding</strong> in rice.<br />
In: <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding, IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines pp. 615-620.<br />
Berger, E. 1976. Heterosis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the mainten<strong>an</strong>ce of enzyme polymorphism. Amer. Nat.llO:<br />
823-839.<br />
Bharaj, T. S., Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1995. Chromosomal location of fertility restoring<br />
genes for 'Wild Abortive' cytoplasmic male sterility using primary trisomics in rice.<br />
Euphytica 83; 169-173.<br />
Borkakati, R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. 1993. Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of a thermo-sensitive genic male sterile<br />
mut<strong>an</strong>t of indica rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Gene Newslett., 10:92-94.<br />
Brar, D.S., Pujimura, T„ McCouch, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zapata, F.J. 1994, Application of biotechnology in<br />
hybrid rice. In '.Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong> Technology; New Developmental^ Future Prospects S.S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i,<br />
(ed.), IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines pp. 51-62.<br />
Brar, D. S., Guo, Z. Y., Ahmed, M. I., Jachuck, P. J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S. S.1996. Diversification of<br />
CMS system to improve sustainability of hybrid rice technology. Paper presented 3rd<br />
Inti. Symp, Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong>, Indi<strong>an</strong> Council of Agricultural Research, November 14-16,1996.<br />
Chauh<strong>an</strong>, J.S., Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S. S., Aquino, R. C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vergara, B. S. 1983. Evaluation of hybrid rice<br />
for ratooning ability. Inti; <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newslett. 8(6): 6.<br />
Chen, J. S., Lin, Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jun, C. W. 1988. A study of apomixis in rice. Genet. M<strong>an</strong>ipulations Crops<br />
Newslett. 4(2); 3~10.<br />
Chen, Yinhui, Cai, Jumai <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Lu Haor<strong>an</strong>. 1987. Effects of male sterile cytoplasmic interaction<br />
on the genetic perform<strong>an</strong>ce of rice. /. Fuji<strong>an</strong> Agrie. Coll.16 (3): 190-197.<br />
Cheng, Y. K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hu<strong>an</strong>, C.S. 1979. Studies on cytoplasmic-genetic male sterility in cultivated<br />
rice (Oryzfl sativa L.). I. Effect of different cytoplasm sources on male abnormalities at<br />
<strong>an</strong>thesis. /. Agrie, Assoc. China 106:11-22.<br />
Chopra, K. 1996. Global assessment of hybrid rice technologies for <strong>breeding</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> seed<br />
production, Proc. 18th session Inti. <strong>Rice</strong> Comm., Rome, Italy, 5-9 September 1994, pp. 23-<br />
36.<br />
Chu, Y.E. 1967. Variation in peroxide isozymes of On/za perennis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. sativa. }pn. i. Genet.<br />
42: 233-240,<br />
Comstock/ R, E, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Robinson/ H.F. 1952. Estimation of average domin<strong>an</strong>ce of genes. In;<br />
Heterosis J.W. Gowen fed,)/ Iowa State College Press, Ames, lA pp. 494-^516.<br />
Dalmacip, R. D,, Brar, D, S., Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G. S. 1996. Male sterile line in rice O.<br />
sativa L , developed from O, glumaepatula cytoplasm. Inti <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newslett. 21(1): 22-23.<br />
Dalmado, R.D., Brar, D.S., Ishii, T., Sitch, L.A., Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S. S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G. S. 1995.<br />
Identification <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of new cytoplasmic male sterility source from O. perennis into<br />
indica rice (Oryza sativa 1.). Euphytica 82:221-225.<br />
Deng, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>g, G. 1984. A study on prediction of heterosis in crops, II. Analysis of<br />
heterosis of rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its esterase zymogram patterns, complementary patterns <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
artificial hybrid zymogram patterns. Hu<strong>an</strong> Agrie. Set. 3; 1-5. (in Chinese).<br />
Erickson, J.R. 1969. Cytoplasmic male sterility in rice {Oryza sativa L). Agron. Abs. B.<br />
Fu, Q. 1985. Studiés on the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of restoring genes for wild abortive cytoplasmic<br />
sterility in rice fOruzflfiiJfmfl-suBfi ho ela« >■ • - ...........
J.S. Nända <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S.S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i<br />
Pu, P.Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pai, C. 1979. Genetic studies on .isozymes in rice pl<strong>an</strong>t 2. Classification <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
geographic distribution of cultivated rice through isozyme studies,/. Agrie. Assoc. China<br />
107:1"16 (in Chinese with English summary).<br />
Gallis, A. 1988. Heterosis: its genetic basis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its utilization in pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>breeding</strong>. Euphytica<br />
39(3); 95-104.<br />
Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n, J.C. 1987. Isozymes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> classification of Asi<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice varieties. Theor.<br />
Appl. Genet.74:: 21-30.<br />
Govinda Raj, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. 1988. Genetics of fertility restoration of WA type<br />
cytoplasmic male sterility in rice. Crop. Sei, 28; 7&7~792.<br />
Hu, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Li, Z. 1985. A preliminary study on the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of male sterility of rice male<br />
sterile lines with four different kinds of cytoplasms. /. Huai^oung Agrie. Coll. 4(2): 15-22.<br />
Ikehashi, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki, H. 1984. Varietal screening of compatibility types revealed in Fj<br />
fertility of dist<strong>an</strong>t crosses in rice. Jpn. J, Breed. 34:304-313-<br />
Ikehashi, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki, H. 1986. Genetics of Fj sterility in remote crosses of rice. In: <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genetics, IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines pp. 119-130,<br />
Ikehashi, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki, H. 1987. Screening <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis of wide compatibility in<br />
hybrids of dist<strong>an</strong>t crosses in rice, Oryza sativa. Tech. Bull. 22. Tropical Agrie, Res. Center,<br />
Jap<strong>an</strong>.<br />
IRRI. 1986. Annual Report for 1985. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines.<br />
IRRI. 1995. Program Report for 1994. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines.<br />
Jinks, J.L. 1983. Biometrical <strong>genetics</strong> of heterosis. In: "Heterosis—Reappraisal of Theory <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Practice" R. Fr<strong>an</strong>kel, (ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 1-46.<br />
Jones, J.W. 1926. Hybrid vigor in rice. J. Amer, Soc. Agron.l8:424-428.<br />
Julfiquar, A. W., Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S. S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Carpena, A. L. 1985. Genetic divergence among some<br />
maintainer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> restorer lines in relation to hybrid <strong>breeding</strong> in rice (Oryza sativa L ) Theor.<br />
Appl. Genet. 70:671-678.<br />
Katsuo, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mizushima, U. 1958. Studies on the cytoplasmic difference among rice<br />
varieties, Oryza sativa L. On the fertility of hybrids obtained reciprocally between<br />
cultivated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>'wild varieties. Jpn. f. Breed. 8:1-5 (in Jap<strong>an</strong>ese).<br />
Khush, G.S. 1994. Increasing the genetic yield potential of rice; prospects <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> approaches.<br />
Inti. <strong>Rice</strong> Comm. Neioslett, 43:1-8, FAO, Rome, 1995.<br />
Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Aquino, R.C. 1994. Breeding tropical japónicas for hybrid rice production.<br />
In: Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong>: New Developments <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Future Prospects S.S.Virm<strong>an</strong>i (ed.), IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila,<br />
Philippines pp. 1-21,<br />
Kim, C. H. 1985. Studies on heterosis in Fj rice hybrids using cytoplasmic-genetic male<br />
sterile lines of rice (Oryza sativa L.), Res. Rep. Rural Dev. Administration, Suxoeon, Korea<br />
27(1): 1-33.<br />
Kinoshita, T. 1992. Report of the committee on gene symbolization, nomenclature <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
linkage groups. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Neufslett. 9:2-4.<br />
Kitamura, E. 1962, Studies on cytoplasmic sterility of hybrids in dist<strong>an</strong>tly related varieties of<br />
rice, Oryza sativa L. I. Fertility of Fi hybrids between strains derived from a certain<br />
Philippine x Jap<strong>an</strong>ese variety crosses <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jap<strong>an</strong>ese varieties. Jpn. J. Breed. 12; 81-84.<br />
Kumar, I, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Saini, S.S. 1981. Diallel <strong>an</strong>alysis in rice combining ability for various<br />
qu<strong>an</strong>titative characters. Genet. Agrie. 35: 243-252.<br />
Li, Y.C. 1985. The pedigree <strong>an</strong>alysis of the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of restoring genes in IR24. Sei. Agrie.<br />
Sin 1:24-31.<br />
T.i. Y.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ane. S. 1988. Genetic dist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> heterosis in japónica rice. In; Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong>,
50 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Li, Z. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zhu, Y. 1988 <strong>Rice</strong> male sterile cytoplasm <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fertility restoration. In: Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong>,<br />
IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines pp. 85--102.<br />
Lin, S.C- <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yu<strong>an</strong>, L.P. 1980, Hybrid rice <strong>breeding</strong> in China. In: Innovative Approadies to <strong>Rice</strong><br />
<strong>breeding</strong>, IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines pp. 35-51.<br />
Lu, X. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>g, J. 1988. Fertility tr<strong>an</strong>sformation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic behavior of Hubei<br />
photoperiod'Sensitive genetic male sterile rice. In: Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong>. Proc. Int. Symp. Hybrid<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>. Ch<strong>an</strong>gsha, Hun<strong>an</strong>, China, Oct 6-10,1986. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp 129-138.<br />
Lu, X.G., Zh<strong>an</strong>g, G., Maruyama, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. 1994. Current status of two-line method<br />
of hybrid rice <strong>breeding</strong>. In: Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong> Technology: New Developments <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Future Prospects,<br />
S.S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i (ed.), IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 37-50.<br />
Mackill, D.J, 1995. Classifying japónica rice cultivars with RAPD. Crop. Sci.35:889-894.<br />
Mahal<strong>an</strong>obis, P.C. 1936, On the generalized dist<strong>an</strong>ce in statistics. Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India B.<br />
2: 49-55.<br />
Maruyama, S., Mijazato, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nose, A. 1985. Basic studies in utilization of hybrid vigor in<br />
rice. V. Reciprocal difference <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> heterosis in hybrid seeds <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>ts./p«. /. Crop. Sci.<br />
54(4): 318-323.<br />
Maruyama, K., Araki, H, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kato, H. 1991. Thermosensitive genetic male sterility induced<br />
by irradiation. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics II, IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 227-232,<br />
Orad, J, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hu, J. G. 1995. Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> characterization of pollen fertility in<br />
photoperiodically sensitive rice mut<strong>an</strong>ts. Euphytica 82:17-23.<br />
Pai, C., Endo, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Oka, H. 1.1975, Genic <strong>an</strong>alysis for acid phosphatase isozymes in Oryza<br />
perennis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O, sativa. C<strong>an</strong>. /. Genet. Cytol. 17:637-650. .<br />
Peng, J. Y, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S. S. 1990. Combirung ability for yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> four related traits in<br />
relation to hybrid <strong>breeding</strong> in rice, Oryza 27:1-10.<br />
Peng, J.Y., Glazm<strong>an</strong>n., J.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. 1988. Heterosis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> isozyme divergence in<br />
indica rice, Crop Sci. 28; 561-563.<br />
Ponnuthurai, S., Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S. S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vergara, B, S. 1984, Comparative studies on the growth<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grain yield of some rice {Oryza sativa L.) hybrids. Philipp. ]. Crop Sci. 9(3): 183-193.<br />
Pradh<strong>an</strong>, S. B., Ratho, S. N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jachuck, P. J. 1990b. Development of new cytoplasmic genic<br />
male sterile lines through indica x japónica hybridization. Euphytica 48; 215-218,<br />
Pradh<strong>an</strong>, S. B., Ratho, S. N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jachuck, P. J. 1990a. Development of new cytoplasmic<br />
genetic male sterile lines through indica x japónica hybridization in rice Euphytica<br />
51: 127-130.<br />
Rutger, J. N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shinjyo, C. 1980. Male sterility in rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its potential use in <strong>breeding</strong>. In:<br />
Innovative Approaches to <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding, IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 53-66.<br />
Sampath, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Moh<strong>an</strong>ty, H.K. 1954. Cytology of semisterile rice hybrid. Cwrr. Sci, 2 3 :18JJ-<br />
183.<br />
Sasahara, T., Cui, C.H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kambayashi, M. 1986. Cold resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice with some reference<br />
to cytoplasmic effects. SABRAO 18(1): 69-71.<br />
Saty<strong>an</strong>aray<strong>an</strong>a, P.V., Kumar, I, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reddy, M. S. S, 1995. A new source of thennosensitive<br />
genic male sterility for two-line hybrid rice <strong>breeding</strong>. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res, Newslett. 20(1): 10.<br />
Second, G. 1982. Origin of the genetic diversity of cultivated rice ( Oryza spp.)-. Study of the<br />
polymorphism scored at 40 isozyme loci. ]pn. /, Gent. 57:25-57.<br />
Senadhira, D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S. S. 1987. Survival of some F^ rice hybrids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their parents in<br />
saline soil. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newslett. 12(1): 14-15.<br />
Shahi, B. B., Morishima, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Oka, H. 1.1969. A survey of variation in peroxidase, add<br />
phosphatase, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> esterase isozyme of wild <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cultivated Oryza species, fpn. f. Genet. 44:<br />
.808-319.
J.S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S.S. Virm<strong>an</strong>i 51<br />
Shinjyo, C. 1975. Genetical studies oí cytoplasmic male sterility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fertility restoration in<br />
rice, Oryza sativa L. Bull Coll Agrie., Lfnítí. Ryukus. 22:1-57.<br />
Shirijyo, C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Omura, T. 1966, Cytoplasmic male sterility in cultivated rice,. Oryza sativa L.<br />
I. Fertilities of Fj, F2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> offsprings obtained from their mutual reciprocal backcrosses<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> segregation of completely male sterile pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Jpn. /. Breed. 16(Suppl. 1): 179-180.<br />
Shinjyo, C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Matomura, K, 1981. Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of male sterility in isogenic lines of Taichung<br />
65 possessing male sterile cytoplasm <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fertility restorer genes from Oryza perertnts<br />
W1080 strain, Jpn. J. Breed. 31 (Suppl. 1); 240-241, (in Jap<strong>an</strong>ese).<br />
Shinjyo, C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sato, S. 1994. Chromosomal location of fertility-restoring gene Rf-2. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genet. Newslett. 11:93-95.<br />
Shinjyo, C,, Ishimura, Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>aki, M. 1981. Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of male sterility in isogenic lines of<br />
Taicung 65 possessing male-sterile cytoplasm <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fertility restoring genes of Oryza<br />
perennis W1080 strain. }pn. f. Breed. 31 (Suppl. 1): 238-239 (in Jap<strong>an</strong>ese).<br />
Shull, G. H. 1908. The composition of a field maize. Amer. Breed Assoc. Rep. 4:296-301.<br />
Siddiq, É.A., Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S., Ahmed, I.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jachuck, P.J. 1996, Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong>-A promising<br />
technological adv<strong>an</strong>cement for food security during 21st century. Paper presented at<br />
the 3rd Inti Symp, Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong>, November 14-16, Hyderabad, India.<br />
Singh, U.S. 1983. Hybrids excel st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard cultivar. Deep Water <strong>Rice</strong>. 1:1.<br />
Sprague, G. F. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ebehart, S. A, 1977. Corn <strong>breeding</strong>. In: Corn <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Corn Improvement, G.F,<br />
Sprague, (ed)., Amer. Soc. Agron. Madison, WI, pp. 309-362.<br />
Srivastava, M.N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Seshu, D,V. 1983. Combining ability for yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> associated characters<br />
in rice. Crop Scl 23:741-744.<br />
Suh, H.S. 1985. Studies on multiple pistillate male sterile rice. Kore<strong>an</strong> /. Breed. 17:439--443.<br />
Suh, H.S, 1988. Multiple pistillate male sterile rices for hybrid seed production. In ; Hybrid<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>, IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp, 181-187.<br />
Sun, Z. X., Min, S. K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xiong, Z. M. 1989. A temperature- sensitive mal^sterile line found<br />
in rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newslett. 6 :116-117.<br />
Teng, L. S, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shen, Z. T. 1994. Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of fertility restoration for cytoplasmic male<br />
sterility in rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newslett, 11:95-97.<br />
Ti<strong>an</strong>, C., Cheng, X. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Li<strong>an</strong>g, Z. 1980. Several views on popularization of Hsi<strong>an</strong> (indica)<br />
hybrid rice, Kunming Yunn<strong>an</strong> Nongye Keiji 2:12-18 (In Chinese).<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>, D.T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nguyen, V.N. 1998. Global hybrid rice: Issues <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> challenges. Paper presented<br />
19th Sess. Inti. <strong>Rice</strong> Comm., FAO, Cairo, Egypt, September 7-9.<br />
Vaidy<strong>an</strong>ath, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reddy, G.M. 1985. Studies on genetic divergence in the genus Oryza.<br />
J. Cytol Genet.20:59-68,<br />
Vijaya Kumar, R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. 1992, Wide compatibility in rice {Oryza sativa L.).<br />
Euphytica 64: 71-80.<br />
Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. 1996. Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong>. Adv. Agron. 57:577-^2.<br />
Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shinjyo, C. 1988. Current status of <strong>an</strong>alysis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> symbols for male sterile<br />
cytoplasms <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fertility restoring genes. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newslett. 5:9-15.<br />
Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S. S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>, B. H. 1988. Development of CMS lines in hybrid rice <strong>breeding</strong>, In:<br />
Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong>, IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 103-114.<br />
Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S. S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Voc, P. C. 1991. Induction of photo- <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thermo-sensitive male sterility in<br />
indica rice. Agron. Ahstr. p.ll9.<br />
Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pingali, P.L, 1994, Hybrid rice for tropics; Potentials, <strong>research</strong><br />
<strong>priorities</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> policy issues. In: Hybrid Research <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Development of Major Cereals in Asia<br />
Pacific Region R.S.Paroda <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> M. Rai (eds.)., FAO, B<strong>an</strong>gkok, pp. 61-86.<br />
Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S. S., Young, J. B., Moon, H. P., Kumar, I. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Flinn, J. C. 1991. Increasing rice yields
Ricé Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
W<strong>an</strong>, J. M., Y<strong>an</strong>agihara, S., Kato, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, H. 1993. Multiple alleles at a new locus<br />
causing hybrid sterility between Kore<strong>an</strong> indica variety <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a jav<strong>an</strong>ica variety in rice<br />
(Oryzfl sativa L.) Jpn. J. Breed. 43:507-516.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, C. L., Zou, J. S., W<strong>an</strong>g, Z. M., Li, C.G. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Li, H, B. 1991a. Identification of wide<br />
compatibility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> heterosis in rice, strain 02428 Xu<strong>an</strong>. Chinese /. <strong>Rice</strong> Sei. 51(1): 19-24.<br />
(Chinese with English summary).<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, W.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Wen, H. C. 1995. New cytoplasmic male sterile line with lower negative<br />
effects of cytoplasm on some qu<strong>an</strong>titative traits in rice. Inti. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newslett, 20: 20 in<br />
press.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, X. M., W<strong>an</strong>g, M. Q., Mei, G. Z., Wu, H, Y., Du<strong>an</strong>, W. J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>g, W. J. 1991b.<br />
Photoperiod-conditioned male sterility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its inherit<strong>an</strong>ce in rice. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics II,<br />
IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 217-226.<br />
Watnabe, Y. Sakaguchi, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kudo, M. 1968. On the male sterile rice pl<strong>an</strong>t possessing the<br />
cytoplasm of Burmese variety, Lead <strong>Rice</strong>, Jpn. J. Breed. 18 (suppl, 2): 77-78 (in Jap<strong>an</strong>ese),<br />
Xu, X.J., Yin, H.Q. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yin, H. 1991, Preliminary study of the temperature effect among S-1<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W6154S, Crop Res. (China) 5(2); 4-6.<br />
Xiao, Y. H. 1981. Study on esterase isozyme of hybrid rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> three lines. Hubei Agrie, Sd, II.<br />
(Chinese).<br />
Xizhi, L, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mao, C.X. 1994, Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong> in China-A Success Story. APAARI Publ.: 1994/3,<br />
FAO Regional Office for Asia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Pacific, B<strong>an</strong>gkok.<br />
Yabuno, T. 1977. Genetic studies on the interspecific cytoplasm substitution lines of japónica<br />
varieties of Oryza sativa L <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. glaberrima Steud. Euphytica 26; 451-463.<br />
Y<strong>an</strong>agiharaa, S., Kato, H, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, H. 1992, A new locus for multiple alleles causing<br />
hybrid sterility between <strong>an</strong> aus variety <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> jav<strong>an</strong>ica varieties in rice (Oryza satim L.).)pn.<br />
¡.Breed. 42: 793-801.<br />
Y<strong>an</strong>g, R.C., Li, W.M., W<strong>an</strong>g, N.Y., l<strong>an</strong>g, K.J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chen, Q. H. 1989. Discovery <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> preliminary<br />
study on indica photosensitive genetic male germplasm 5460ps. Chinese J. <strong>Rice</strong> Set. 3(1):<br />
47-48.<br />
Yi, O. H., Shi, S.Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ji<strong>an</strong>g, J.R. 1984. Analysis of the esterase isozymes in three lines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> F]<br />
in Oryza sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> prediction of heterosis. Acta Bot Sin. (Eng. Tr<strong>an</strong>s.) 26:506-512.<br />
Yoshida, S.1981. Fundamentals of <strong>Rice</strong> Crop Science. Los B<strong>an</strong>os, Philippines.<br />
Yoshimura, A., Iwata, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Omura, T. 1982. Linkage <strong>an</strong>alysis by reciprocal tr<strong>an</strong>slocation in<br />
rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts. III. Marker genes located on chromosomes 2,3,4, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 7 Jpn. I Breed. 32(4): 323-<br />
332.<br />
Yu, S.B., Li, J.X., Xu, C,G.,T<strong>an</strong>, Y.F., Gao, Y.J., Li, X.H., Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Qifa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>Saghai Maroof, M.A.<br />
1997. Import<strong>an</strong>ce of epislasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in <strong>an</strong> elite rice hybrid. 94:<br />
9226-9231.<br />
Yu<strong>an</strong>, L. P. 1977. The execution <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> theory of developing hybrid rice, Zhonggue Hongye Kexue<br />
1; 27-31, (in Chinese).<br />
Yu<strong>an</strong>, L.P., Li, Y.C, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Deng, H,D. 1990. Progress of studies in rice twin seedlings. Paper<br />
presented 4th Annual Meeting Rockefeller Foundation's Inti. Program on <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Biotechnology, May 9-12,1990. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines.<br />
Yu<strong>an</strong>, L.P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fu, X.Q. 1996. Technology of Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong> Production. FAO, Rome. 84 pp. ,<br />
Zhou, T.B., Xiao, H.C., Lei, D.Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Du<strong>an</strong>, Q.X. 1988. The <strong>breeding</strong> of indica photosensitive<br />
male sterile line. /. Hun<strong>an</strong> Agrie. Sei. 6:16-18.
Sustainable Integrated<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Production<br />
S. V. Shastry^ D. V. Tr<strong>an</strong>^, V, N. Nguyen® <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> J, S. <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong>*<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> provides about two-thirds of the caloric intake for more th<strong>an</strong> two<br />
billion people in Asia, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one-third of the caloric intake of nearly one<br />
billion people in Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Latin America. <strong>Rice</strong> production in the world<br />
has trebled since the turn of the century, which has enabled a stable<br />
decline in the world rice price (Mitchell, 1987). The growth in rice<br />
production was particularly rapid during the green revolution after the<br />
introduction of high-yielding varieties (HYVs) such as Taichung Native<br />
1, ADT27, H4, H5, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IRS (Ch<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ler, 1979).<br />
World population, however, continues to grow at a high rate of<br />
about 1.7% <strong>an</strong>nually (most of which occurs in the developing world),<br />
resulting in almost 90 million more consumers of agricultural products<br />
per year. In 1992, world dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for milled rice was about 390 Mt <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is<br />
expected to increase about 2% per <strong>an</strong>num over the next two decades<br />
(Yap, 1992). However, the phenomenal growth in rice production<br />
achieved with the adoption of green revolution technologies in areas with<br />
high yield potential, notably in Asia, has shown signs of accumulative<br />
^Former-Director of Research, IITA, Ibad<strong>an</strong>, Nigeria.<br />
Senior <strong>Rice</strong> Agronomist, FAO.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Agronomist, FAO, Rome.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics Specialist, GUY/91/001, FAO of the United Nations, Rome
The term "green revolution" is employed to describe the phenomenal<br />
growth in cereal production (including rice) that was achieved in the<br />
1960s in areas with a high potential for yield, by concurrent application of<br />
genetic, fertilizer, irrigation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>t protection technologies. In the case<br />
of rice, the green revolution has enabled a steady increase in production<br />
in Asia, which is well ahead of population growth in m<strong>an</strong>y countries<br />
(Singh in FAO, 1992). In Latin America, it allowed the region to be nearly<br />
self-sufficient, producing about 97 % of its consumption (FAO, 1993). In<br />
Africa, however, it has not been able to cope with <strong>an</strong> ever-increasing high<br />
rate of consumption.<br />
The green revolution has undoubtedly established the technical<br />
feasibility of maintaining high production in irrigated ecology, but has<br />
made a limited contribution in areas with poor water control <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> totally<br />
failed in areas with problem soils. In areas where it has been successful,<br />
the green revolution has introduced the type of rice farming that dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s<br />
a high investment. However, signific<strong>an</strong>t concerns have centered on<br />
"mining" the soil for pl<strong>an</strong>t nutrients, ch<strong>an</strong>ges in the status of rice pests<br />
from minor to major economic import<strong>an</strong>ce, the negative impact on the<br />
environment, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> on the long-term sustainability of production growth.<br />
The widespread use of HYVs has reduced the biodiversity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the germ<br />
sfnrk of fradifinnal nrndiirHon svstems. Recent!v. vield decline has been<br />
54 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
stresses (De Datta, 1994) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> has generated numerous problems with<br />
aspects r<strong>an</strong>ging from the biological to environmental <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> socioeconomic<br />
(Tr<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ton That, 1994). At the other end of the scale, the increase in<br />
rice production by exp<strong>an</strong>sion of upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> area, notably in Africa, has<br />
accelerated deforestation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> desertification which, in m<strong>an</strong>y countries,<br />
has caused severe losses in natural resources <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> biodiversity, as well as<br />
irreparable damages to the environment.<br />
International concern about rice production, therefore, has shifted<br />
from per se to sustainability of production growth, from the profitability<br />
of rice farming as <strong>an</strong> enterprise to conservation of the resource base <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
mainten<strong>an</strong>ce of the integrity of the environment for prosperity. Every<br />
technological opportunity for exp<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing rice production <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> elevating<br />
rice productivity is being scrutinized for sustainability over a longer time<br />
frame <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for its impact on the environment. In the coming decades, the<br />
challenge facing rice production will not be in exp<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing rice production<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> productivity at <strong>an</strong>y cost, but in integrating the diverse elements of<br />
technologies <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> evaluating the sustainability of technology packages.<br />
THE GREEN REVOLUTION
SUSTAINABLE IRRIGATED RICE<br />
S.V. Shastry et at.<br />
not to lose the tempo gained by the green revolution, while at the same<br />
time mitigating the associated negative effects. There is a const<strong>an</strong>t need to<br />
keep the dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> supply situation of rice in view while investigating<br />
the toler<strong>an</strong>ce limits for existing technology packages <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> emphasizing<br />
the need for innovation in specific areas.<br />
SUSTAINABLE RICE PRODUCTION<br />
Most rice production systems, with the possible exception of slash-<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>burn<br />
shifting rice cultivation, are considered relatively sustainable. These<br />
systems continue, albeit at a low level of output per unit of l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> time.<br />
However, Rutten (1988) stated that if the concept of sustainability serves<br />
as a guide, it must include the use of technology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> practices that<br />
enh<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> at the same time sustain productivity. The output of a<br />
sustainable system, which is different from the output of a stable system,<br />
must not only remain unch<strong>an</strong>ged, but must increase with time to satisfy<br />
the dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> of <strong>an</strong> increasing population. A sustainable agricultural<br />
system is one that c<strong>an</strong> evolve indefinitely towards greater hum<strong>an</strong> utility,<br />
greater efficiency of resource use, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a bal<strong>an</strong>ce with the environment<br />
that is favorable to hum<strong>an</strong>s <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to most other species (Harwood, 1988).<br />
The broad definition of sustainable development was elaborated by FAO<br />
as follows (FAO, 1989):<br />
Sustainable rural development is the m<strong>an</strong>agement <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> conservation<br />
of the natural resource base, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the orientation of technological <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
institutional ch<strong>an</strong>ge in such a m<strong>an</strong>ner as to assure the attainment <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
continued satisfaction of hum<strong>an</strong> needs for the present <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> future<br />
generations. Such sustainable development, in the agriculture, forestry<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fisheries sectors, conserves l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, water, pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>imal genetic<br />
resources, is environmentally non-degrading, technically appropriate,<br />
economically viable <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> socially acceptable.<br />
Sustainable rice production systems, therefore, may be defined as<br />
the ones in which technology packages are chosen for increasing paddy<br />
yield with a rational concern for resource, economy, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
environment. Such systems are exercisable, although they do not yet<br />
exist in ready forms.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> is grown over a wide r<strong>an</strong>ge of climatic, soil, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> water regimes,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> different classifications exist; the one adopted by the International<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (IRRI, 1984) is used here,
■' ■<br />
Wtä<br />
..--■■■<br />
56 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
(IRRI^ 1993). The irrigated rice ecology has experienced the most<br />
intensive adoption of green revolution technologies, such as HYVs,<br />
inorg<strong>an</strong>ic fertilizers, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pesticide application. In addition, the level of<br />
crop intensification is highest in irrigated rice ecology. The<br />
intensification of irrigated rice production, however, has led to a longterm<br />
decline in productivity. Although evidence is still scarce, yields of<br />
some modern varieties under optimal m<strong>an</strong>agement at IRRI <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other<br />
locations in the Philippines have declined by 0.1 to 0.3 the t ha”^y'^ over<br />
a 20-year period (Flinn, et al., 1982).<br />
The intensive monoculture of rice in <strong>an</strong> irrigated ecology has led to a<br />
build-up of salinity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> waterlogging, micronutrient deficiencies,<br />
formation of hardp<strong>an</strong>, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong> increased pest build-up. Other major<br />
concerns relating to sustainability of irrigated rice production systems<br />
are the increasingly limited water supply available for rice production,<br />
the clogging of waterways with aquatic weeds, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the plateau in yield<br />
potential of conventionally bred rice varieties of ttie green revolution<br />
generations (IRS type).<br />
The sustainability of rice production in irrigated ecology, however,<br />
will be increasingly dependent upon yield increase <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cropping<br />
intensity, as there is limited scope for the exp<strong>an</strong>sion of net area. During<br />
the past decade, rice, paddy areas in most of the major rice producing<br />
cormtries in Asia had remained static or even declined. In Latin America<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Africa, although there are regions with areas still potentially suitable<br />
for conversion to irrigated rice production, the cost of development of<br />
<strong>an</strong> irrigation infrastructure is too high to be affordable for m<strong>an</strong>y<br />
countries. The average yields of irrigated rice in m<strong>an</strong>y countries are still<br />
only about 3 to 4 t ha'^. There are therefore ample opportunities for<br />
increasing yield. It is necessary to mobilUe the inputs required to adopt<br />
recommended practices fully <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thus exploit judiciously the<br />
production potential of irrigated l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s.<br />
WATER MANAGEMENT<br />
The availability of water for irrigated rice productiori will become scarce<br />
increasingly as water in reservoirs, which were built for irrigation<br />
purposes, is increasingly diverted for household <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> industrial uses. The<br />
situation is particularly critical in arid <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> semi-arid areas. The efficiency<br />
of water m<strong>an</strong>agement practices in rice production must be critically<br />
L----£ :—<br />
r m i i a f l^ p v i p W f i d
Classic methods of maintaining soil productivity are fallowing, crop<br />
rotation, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> application of org<strong>an</strong>ic m<strong>an</strong>ures. With the advent of<br />
fertilizers for farming, the classic methods of soil productivity<br />
mainten<strong>an</strong>ce receded into the background. Major pl<strong>an</strong>t nutrients, which<br />
used to limit crop production, such as nitrogen, phosphorus <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
potassium, could now be enriched by application of fertilizers, which<br />
were high-<strong>an</strong>alysis compounds. Genetic improvement of crop pl<strong>an</strong>ts,<br />
which paid particular attention to crop cultivars responding to high<br />
rates of fertilizer application, further elevated the role of fertilizers in<br />
farming. However, several developments in the 1970s contributed to<br />
dampening the enthusiasm for fertilizers. After the energy crisis of 1973,<br />
the prices of fertilizers soared, resulting in <strong>an</strong> unfavorable bal<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
between the costs of grain <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fertilizers. Concerns about the<br />
environment have also conflicted with the promotion of fertilizers.<br />
Leachates from fertilized soil end up as nitrates in waterways.<br />
The concept of fertilizer application needs to be guided by the<br />
__ --t *1 J 1-------i.----------------------------X<br />
S.V. Shastry et at. 5 7<br />
<strong>an</strong> excessive waste of water, especially when feeder c<strong>an</strong>als are unlined<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> field bunds are neither well constructed nor maintained. Recent<br />
<strong>research</strong> has shown that intermittent flooding to keep the soil saturated<br />
provides better water-use efficiency (K<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iah, et al., 1990). Integrating<br />
the irrigation schedule with the time of fertilizer application <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
weeding c<strong>an</strong> avoid unnecessary drainage, thereby saving water. The<br />
timing of irrigation following rainfall distribution also reduces water<br />
loss through field runoff.<br />
Much water is wasted, since the water tariff is based on the area<br />
irrigated rather th<strong>an</strong> on the volume of water used. Volumetric fees would<br />
improve the farmers' incentive to aim for better water-use efficiency.<br />
Pivotal to all reform in water use is to educate beneficiaries on the need to<br />
reform <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> on the result<strong>an</strong>t opportunities, such as:<br />
• adherence to a tight calendar of field operations so as to minimize<br />
wasteful water runoff;<br />
• consolidation of holdings <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> compensatory l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> use;<br />
• choice of early-maturing cultivars <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> improvement of cropping<br />
intensity;<br />
• org<strong>an</strong>ization of community nurseries;<br />
• mainten<strong>an</strong>ce of field ch<strong>an</strong>nels <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> drains;<br />
• timely <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> efficient weed control.<br />
INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
58 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
long term. The notion of bal<strong>an</strong>ced fertilization envisages total nutrients<br />
available in the soil summed with <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> added fertilizers. In practice,<br />
however, the bal<strong>an</strong>ce is often influenced by the nutrient composition of<br />
added fertilizer,s. The recommended rates of P <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> K may either be<br />
inadequate or unnecessary. During 1981-1983, bal<strong>an</strong>ced fertilization<br />
produced higher yields <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> economic returns in demonstrations<br />
conducted in different agro-ecological zones in B<strong>an</strong>gladesh (Roy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Pederson, 1990).<br />
Every me<strong>an</strong>s to improve the efficiency of fertilizer use has become<br />
import<strong>an</strong>t. Technologies of the prefertilizer era, such as green m<strong>an</strong>uring<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the application of farmyard m<strong>an</strong>ure <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> compost, are being<br />
reemphasized. Adv<strong>an</strong>tage is being taken of the possibilities for biological<br />
nitrogen fixation with blue-green algae, Azolla ferns <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> free-living<br />
bacteria. Attempts to minimize fertilizer losses from the soil by modifying<br />
the practice of fertilizer application are underway. Practices such as<br />
coating urea with org<strong>an</strong>ic wastes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mixing it with soil to form pellets<br />
have gained renewed appeal.<br />
Water m<strong>an</strong>agement needs to be modified so as to compleiuent the<br />
use of fertilizers. Knowledge of crop pl<strong>an</strong>ts, such as their growth rates<br />
peak dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s for nutrients <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, is essential if the best benefits from<br />
fertilizers are to be realized while agronomic practices that synergize<br />
with m<strong>an</strong>agement of soil, water, symbionts <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> crop pl<strong>an</strong>ts will also<br />
have to be employed. The integrated nutrient m<strong>an</strong>agement system<br />
(INMS) is therefore a composite package of improved crop agronomy to<br />
increase <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sustain crop production without "mining'^ the soil <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> / or<br />
polluting the environment.<br />
INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT<br />
"Pest" is a collective term employed for various living org<strong>an</strong>isms (e.g.<br />
weeds, insects, fungi, viruses <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rodents) that cause crop yield losses<br />
as a result of competition, infection, infestation or ingestion. Experience<br />
with chemical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic control <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other approaches has led to a<br />
consensus that pests are not universally destructive <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that their<br />
<strong>an</strong>nihilation is not always desirable. A pesticide is <strong>an</strong> alleviator of specific<br />
stresses. Furthermore, it is often uneconomical to reduce pest population<br />
to very low levels. For <strong>an</strong> intelligent m<strong>an</strong>agement of pests, it is necessary<br />
to recognize the conditions which promote crop growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
as well as the ecology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> population dynamics of pests <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their natural<br />
enemies.
S;V. Shastry et at. 59<br />
expense of weed growth. Choosing cultivars with a rapid tillering habit,<br />
coupled with practices such as pl<strong>an</strong>ting of young seedlings with close<br />
spacing to accelerate tillering, c<strong>an</strong> produce a dense crop c<strong>an</strong>opy that c<strong>an</strong><br />
smother weeds. This effect may be further enh<strong>an</strong>ced when the cultivar<br />
has drooping leaves <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> when the crop has been adequately fertilized.<br />
An integrated package of genetic, mech<strong>an</strong>ical, water <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fertilizer<br />
technologies c<strong>an</strong> thus produce a sea ch<strong>an</strong>ge in the crop-weed bal<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />
M<strong>an</strong>agement of major rice diseases caused by fungi (rice blast),<br />
bacteria (leaf blight) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> viruses (tungro, grassy stunt) is achieved by a<br />
combination of practices. The choice of a highly resist<strong>an</strong>t genotype is<br />
beginning to lose its appeal because such resist<strong>an</strong>ce is often contained in a<br />
limited number of major genes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is therefore frequently ephemeral.<br />
Instead, durable resist<strong>an</strong>ce controlled by polygenes is preferable. Altering<br />
the sowing times so as to minimize the ch<strong>an</strong>ces of synchrony of the most<br />
susceptible host stage with environments-favorable for disease build-up,<br />
control of vectors or cultivation of trap crops for vectors of viral disease,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chemical control guided by disease forecasting (e.g. for blast) have<br />
visible effects on slowing down the epiphytotics. With the ch<strong>an</strong>ge in the<br />
"pl<strong>an</strong>t type" cultivars, the status of some diseases has also ch<strong>an</strong>ged. For<br />
example, bacterial leaf blight was recognized as a major disease only after<br />
the semidwarf varieties came to be grown in monsoon-affected Asia.<br />
A bl<strong>an</strong>ket cover of insecticide protection (i.e., prophylaxis) has been<br />
progressively recognized as being more harmful th<strong>an</strong> useful, since it<br />
eliminates a wide array of beneificial insects. Whereas genetic resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
has offered dramatic opportunities with respect to gall midge <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> brown<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>thopper, biotic variation in these insects has necessitated a const<strong>an</strong>t<br />
vigil. The import<strong>an</strong>ce of crop growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> health in partially<br />
compensating for insect infestation is convincing in the context of stem<br />
borer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> indicative in the context of other insects. For example, the<br />
damage caused by borers during the tillering phase (reflected in dead<br />
hearts) is almost fully compensated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> so, in most cases, chemical<br />
control of borers at this stage is unwarr<strong>an</strong>ted.<br />
A new movement, integrated pest m<strong>an</strong>agement (IPM), has gained<br />
currency in m<strong>an</strong>y developing countries. The emphasis of IPM is on<br />
experimentation at the field level <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> it is aimed at farmers. IPM views<br />
the crop in a holistic way <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> seeks to give weight at once to crop<br />
agronomy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>t protection. Emphasis is given to field diagnosis of<br />
the problem in its incipient stage. The complexity of mixed infections<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>/or infestations is discussed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> farmers are educated about the role<br />
of helpful fauna in rice fields. They are also taught to "dodge" the use of<br />
pesticide <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to decide for themselves when it is absolntplv nerpRR^rv to
60 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
MECHANIZATION<br />
Irrigated rice farming is in itself labor intensive <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> labor input rises<br />
further with the level of intensification; so mech<strong>an</strong>ization of a sort that<br />
matches the resource endowments of farmers is essential. <strong>Rice</strong> farming<br />
mech<strong>an</strong>ization has made a wide r<strong>an</strong>ge of labor-saving equipment<br />
available for irrigated rice production. However^ developing countries<br />
have little option other th<strong>an</strong> to pay attention to intermediate scale<br />
mech<strong>an</strong>ization <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> place greater reli<strong>an</strong>ce on renewable sources of energy.<br />
The humid tropical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> semiarid belt of sub-Sahar<strong>an</strong> Africa is one such<br />
example. The gap between the h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hoe <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> machete level of<br />
mech<strong>an</strong>ization <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tractorization is so wide that the former is grossly<br />
inadequate <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the latter is woefully unsustainable. The promotion of<br />
draft <strong>an</strong>imals for traction <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>sport need not be considered<br />
negatively, but rather recognized as the most appropriate in its particular<br />
context. Mech<strong>an</strong>ization in rice production must be viewed not only as a<br />
me<strong>an</strong>s to reduce labor inputs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hum<strong>an</strong> drudgery, but also a way to<br />
generate employment through the local m<strong>an</strong>ufacture <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mainten<strong>an</strong>ce of<br />
equipment.<br />
GENETIC IMPROVEMENT<br />
Wl<br />
The key to green revolution technologies is HYVs. However, the yielding<br />
potential of conventionally bred varieties of the green revolution<br />
generations for irrigated rice has reached a plateau. The development<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> adoption of new generation HYVs , especially with short duration,<br />
are still needed for sustainable irrigated rice production. High-yielding<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> short-duration rice varieties permit not only a higher level of rice<br />
production, but also better crop diversification, as less l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is needed<br />
for a shorter time to produce a certain qu<strong>an</strong>tity of rice. Diversification of<br />
intensified rice monoculture -reduces the risk of increasing the water<br />
table, which causes salinity in arid areas, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> waterlogging in humid<br />
areas. The development of hybrid rice with a yield potential of about 15<br />
to 30% over the best yields of conventional varieties gives much hope for<br />
sustainable irrigated rice production (Ton That, 1992). In China, the<br />
wide adoption of hybrid rice for cultivation has saved more th<strong>an</strong> 2<br />
million ha of l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for diversified crops, fisheries <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> livestock<br />
production. India, the Philippines, Vietnam <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other countries are also<br />
engaging in the development <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> production of hybrid rice. Efforts to<br />
develop super HYVs is <strong>an</strong>other move in the right direction.<br />
Farmers have bred their own rice varieties over the centuries. Today,<br />
the wide adoption of HYVs is the main cause of genetic erosion, as
S.V. Shastry et at. 61<br />
traditional rice is replaced <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> natural biodiversity declines. National<br />
governments <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> international org<strong>an</strong>izations should seek appropriate<br />
approaches to protect genetic diversity in time. They should enh<strong>an</strong>ce the<br />
conservation, evaluation, exch<strong>an</strong>ge <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> utilization of germplasm at the<br />
local, regional, national, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> international level, while taking farmers'<br />
rights into consideration. The wide-spread use of HYVs has also reduced<br />
fish production horn the traditional rice-fish culture system in m<strong>an</strong>y<br />
Asi<strong>an</strong> countries, as the agronomic: conditions used for HYVs are not<br />
suitable for fish life (Choudhury, 1996). The IPM approach <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
greening of rice production by encouraging org<strong>an</strong>ic fertilizer use would<br />
promote the resurgence of fish, frogs, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> m<strong>an</strong>y phytons in rice<br />
microfauna <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> microflora, resulting both in improved farmers' incomes<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hum<strong>an</strong> nutrition.<br />
DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF IRRIGATION<br />
SCHEMES<br />
Most discussion regarding irrigation centers on the scale of projects. The<br />
so-called large irrigation schemes are losing their popularity for a variety<br />
of reasons. Water-use efficiency is discouragingly low for a given level of<br />
investment, since a major portion of water loss is traceable to storage <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
tr<strong>an</strong>smission, The loss in tr<strong>an</strong>smission is high because, in <strong>an</strong> effort to<br />
scale down cost, m<strong>an</strong>y countries sacrifice sophistication when designing<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>smission c<strong>an</strong>als, l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>-shaping, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> making provision for drainage.<br />
The rehabilitation of large-scale irrigation schemes is <strong>an</strong> expensive<br />
operation.<br />
Therefore, the so-called small-scale irrigation schemes have grown<br />
in import<strong>an</strong>ce. The smallest irrigation scheme is the harnessing of<br />
underground or surface water for lift irrigation of <strong>an</strong> area totally owned<br />
by a family. Next in the scale are the medium-sized>'reservoirs which rely<br />
on the principle of water harvesting found in dry zones in Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
India or in inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> swamp valleys in West Africa. Larger schemes entail<br />
the diversification of rivulets for gravity flow. The long-term<br />
sustainability of these schemes depends on the recharge of aquifers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
the precipitation in a watershed; it is impaired by lowering of the water<br />
table, silting of reservoirs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> clogging of waterways. The m<strong>an</strong>agement<br />
of these irrigation schemes needs to be vigil<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> correctives must be<br />
introduced on a timely basis.<br />
There are some pervasive problems in rice farming in small<br />
irrigation schemes. The small size of holdings, along with their dispersal<br />
over wide dist<strong>an</strong>ces, leads to unavoidable losses in water. When the<br />
sowing of seedbeds is unduly protracted, the efficiency of water use
62 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
suffers because of <strong>an</strong> "idle run" in irrigation c<strong>an</strong>als. The tendency of<br />
farmers to raise a separate nursery on their own is a waste of resources.<br />
A consensus to consolidate the nurseries (i.e., community nurseries)<br />
close to the reservoir would contribute to the efficiency of water use.<br />
The desilting of reservoirs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the tr<strong>an</strong>sportation of soil to rice fields<br />
need to be encouraged. Holdings in easy reach of the c<strong>an</strong>al tend to be<br />
favored against the tail enders, who suffer from delayed pl<strong>an</strong>ting as well<br />
as submersion after tr<strong>an</strong>spl<strong>an</strong>ting. A reversal of insequence pl<strong>an</strong>tings<br />
(early pl<strong>an</strong>ting in low areas) would improve the aggregate perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
of a scheme.<br />
APPROPRIATE RICE FARMING SYSTEMS<br />
The diversity in rice farming systems is largely due to variation in the<br />
physical/ biological <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hum<strong>an</strong> factors that influence farming. In<br />
B<strong>an</strong>gladesh, for example, the rice crop is grown in three seasons-rspring,<br />
autumn <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> winter-<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> farmers allocate resources for farming activities<br />
by looking at each rice-growing season as a farm unit, guided by such<br />
considerations as subsistence, insur<strong>an</strong>ce against crop failure, income<br />
generation, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> avoid<strong>an</strong>ce of peak period for labor. Over the last three<br />
decades, the Boro (spring) season has grown in import<strong>an</strong>ce. The<br />
uncertainty of production from the Am<strong>an</strong> (winter) rice due to flooding<br />
has made farmers realize the value of spring rice, for which HYV<br />
technology is admirably suitable.<br />
The rice-based cropping system has emerged as <strong>an</strong> import<strong>an</strong>t<br />
program in South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> South Asia. A vast resource of rice fallow is being<br />
mobilized to raise supplementary income-generating crops such as grain<br />
legumes, sunflower, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pe<strong>an</strong>ut. The monocrop farming scenario of<br />
monsoon-affected Asia is rapidly ch<strong>an</strong>ging. The underlying incentives<br />
for these ch<strong>an</strong>ges are increased pressure on l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, declining margins with<br />
monocrop farming, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong> increased awareness of the sustainability of<br />
rice multicrop systems.<br />
Crop intensification is the farmer's practical measure in densely<br />
populated areas, such as the Red River delta <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the central plain in<br />
Vietnam. The traditional crop production system is double cropping of<br />
irrigated rice, using high levels of both internal <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> external inputs.<br />
Large irrigated l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s are left idle between two crops during the cool<br />
weather starting from late September to February, Sweet potatoes,<br />
potatoes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> winter vegetables are traditionally grown on limited areas
S.V. Shastry et at. 63<br />
The HYV technology has, in some cases, accelerated ch<strong>an</strong>ges in the<br />
farming system. Availability of <strong>an</strong> early-maturing HYV such as ADT27<br />
has triggered a large-scale conversion of single-cropped (Samba) rice<br />
l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s into double-cropped (Kurivai <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Thaladi) rice l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s in the<br />
Th<strong>an</strong>javur delta of Tamil Nadu, India. In parts of northern Andhra<br />
Pradesh, two crops of <strong>an</strong> early-maturing HYV are being grown in areas<br />
where one crop of a late-maturing variety (GEB 24) used to be grown.<br />
Several nontraditional rice-growing areas have emerged, (e.g. Pimjab,<br />
Hary<strong>an</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Teleng<strong>an</strong>a in India) in the process of replacing other crops—<br />
maize, sorghum, millet <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cotton—with HYVs of rice.<br />
Since the 1920s, pasture in irrigated rice rotations has been<br />
undertaken in New South Wales in Australia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> still offers potential to<br />
subst<strong>an</strong>tially improve the productivity, profitability, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sustainability<br />
of a rice cropping system. This system has helped Australi<strong>an</strong> rice farmers<br />
to obtain high yields (about 1 0 to 1 2 t ha"^) with less use of chemical<br />
fertilizers (only 60 to 100 kg of N ha'^) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> has provided them with<br />
opportunities for farm income through complementary <strong>an</strong>imal industries.<br />
Farmers usually grow two rice crops, which are then followed by three<br />
consecutive crops of subterr<strong>an</strong>e<strong>an</strong> clover {Trifolium subterr<strong>an</strong>eaum).<br />
These legume-based pastures supply subsequent rice crops with fixed<br />
soil nitrogen, improve soil structure, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> break weed cycles. However,<br />
<strong>research</strong> still needs to address the problems of disease, waterlogging,<br />
salinity, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> acidity as well as the need for improved pasture<br />
establishment <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> m<strong>an</strong>agement technology in order to conserve the<br />
ecology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> maximize production (Tr<strong>an</strong> in FAO, 1994a).<br />
Current interest in diversification is targeted towards utilizing<br />
renewable sources of energy more efficiently, minimizing the use of<br />
scarce high-energy inputs, conserving the productivity potential of<br />
natural resources, alleviating socioeconomic constraints, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lessening<br />
the negative impact of farming on the environment at large. The objective<br />
is to ensure the sustainability of the production system over a long time<br />
frame. The model aims to maximize the opportunities for recycling<br />
products, ensure that the low-cost by-products of one subenterprise<br />
become the inputs of <strong>an</strong>other subenterprise, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> avoid entropy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
waste.<br />
The most obvious aspect of diversification is the complement<br />
between the raising of crops <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> livestock, with Ihe former contributing<br />
the feed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the latter providing the m<strong>an</strong>ure. The less obvious benefit<br />
from diversified farming of crops <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> livestock is a more even<br />
distribution of labor dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, a better dispersal of income generation,
64 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
crops into cereals, legumes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> vegetables, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> livestock into large <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
small rumin<strong>an</strong>ts, nonrumin<strong>an</strong>ts <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> poultry) acts as <strong>an</strong> additional<br />
insur<strong>an</strong>ce against total failure of the enterprise that may result from<br />
unforeseen fluctuation in the dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> price of farm products.<br />
The by-products of rice farming, such as straw, br<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> broken<br />
rice, are often wasted unless the rice farmers keep livestock, dairy<br />
<strong>an</strong>imals, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> poultry. The use of rice field bunds for raising vegetables<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the use of rice fallow for grain legumes would minimize farmers''<br />
trekking back <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> forth between vegetable gardens <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice fields,<br />
which is done in West Africa, with result<strong>an</strong>t entropy. The use of bunds<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fallow would also encourage better utilization of by-products in pig<br />
rearing, as is done in China. There, interest in rice-cum-fish culture has<br />
been revived, particularly in shallow-flooded rice farms where the use<br />
of pesticides is not widespread. Traditional rice-fish culture systems are<br />
commonly exploited in rice fields with water depth of less th<strong>an</strong> 50 cm. It<br />
is estimated that if only 5% of irrigated rice areas with a production<br />
target of 300 kg ha'^y'^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 15% of deepwater rice areas with 600 kg<br />
hay'^ were used for rice-fish culture, a total of 3.2 Mt of fish could be<br />
produced (Choudhury, 1996),<br />
SUSTAINABLE RAINFED LOWLAND RICE<br />
Rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice, including deepwater <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tidal wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s,<br />
constitutes about 31% of the world's harvested rice areas <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 21% of<br />
world rice production (IRRI, 1993). The soil surface in the rainfed<br />
lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s is protected from horizontal displacement by a layer of flooded<br />
water saved from rainfall. In Asia, rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice areas come close<br />
to irrigated rice in terms of area. The yield potential of shallow rainfed<br />
areas with assured rainfall is as good as that of irrigated areas, but it has<br />
remained underexploited. These areas provide great opportunities for<br />
increased rice production. Flooded soils c<strong>an</strong> be continuously farmed.<br />
Submersion cuts down the severity of weed competition <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the soil<br />
reduction that follows flooding helps mobilize the pl<strong>an</strong>t nutrients in the<br />
soil into <strong>an</strong> available form, notably of iron <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> phosphorus. Free-living<br />
bacteria living on the surface of rice roots thrive on the oxygen pumped<br />
by the foliage of flooded rice; some of them are known to fix atmospheric<br />
nitrogen. On the negative side, the decomposition of org<strong>an</strong>ic matter<br />
under <strong>an</strong>aerobic conditions c<strong>an</strong> result in products that are toxic to the<br />
rice pl<strong>an</strong>t. Flooded rice itself is also a contributor to the build-up of<br />
greenhouse gases, particularly meth<strong>an</strong>e.
S.V. Shastry et at. 65<br />
iron <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> phosphorus. A depth of up to 30 cm c<strong>an</strong> render fertilizers less<br />
efficient. A depth in excess of 50 cm tends to activate the elongation of<br />
stemS/ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> only special cultivars c<strong>an</strong> withst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a water depth of more<br />
th<strong>an</strong> 1 m. Some general principles apply to water m<strong>an</strong>agement in all the<br />
lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice ecosystems, namely, fields should never be allowed to dry to<br />
the extent of developing cracks, since major losses of nitrogen c<strong>an</strong> occur<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> weed competition c<strong>an</strong> be intense; fields should not be flooded to<br />
more th<strong>an</strong> 30 cm in depth during the tillering phase; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fields should be<br />
drained if possible when fertilizer is applied (so as to enable absorption<br />
into soil) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reflooded one or two days later to conserve the nitrogen<br />
added to the reduced zone.<br />
L<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s which benefit from horizontal seepage from adjacent ridges<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for this reason remain wet or flooded for a considerable period after<br />
rains stop are highly productive for rice. Their soils are less prone to<br />
erosion <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> less vulnerable in drought th<strong>an</strong> the corresponding upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s.<br />
However, fluctuation in the water table <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> alternation between dry<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> wet surfaces in hydromorphic soils favor aquatic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> weeds,<br />
while the loss of soil nitrogen is accelerated by nitrification <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leaching.<br />
Minor improvements, such as constructing field bunds to follow contour<br />
lines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> making provision for drainage, c<strong>an</strong> elevate the productivity of<br />
hydromorphic l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s. Improvement of hydromorphic soils in inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
swamps for rice production is wide in Asia. In Africa, similar efforts have<br />
been initiated in West Afric<strong>an</strong> countries such as Burkina Faso, Benin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Sierra Leone.<br />
There are about 138 Mha of wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s suitable for the cultivation of<br />
bunded rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice in tropical Africa (Ton That, 1982), but only<br />
about 1.5 % of these are actually cultivated with either rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> or<br />
irrigated rice. Development of these wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s for rice cultivation<br />
increases the sustainability of rice production in Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> helps to slow<br />
down the clearing of forest for upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice cultivation.<br />
In Africa, Asia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Latin America, large areas of deepwater <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
m<strong>an</strong>groves have been successfully exploited over the years for<br />
agricultural production, including rice. Population pressure, however,<br />
has put this exploitation in environmental d<strong>an</strong>ger. Several ecosystems<br />
among those converted to agriculture have shown themselves to be<br />
unsuitable for sustainable deepwater rice production <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> have suffered<br />
. from degradation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ab<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>onment. Such wastel<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s c<strong>an</strong> be restored in<br />
<strong>an</strong> integrated l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> development pl<strong>an</strong> at a reasonable cost <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> effort.<br />
Adequate l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>-use pl<strong>an</strong>ning <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> surveys including socioeconomic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
environmental considerations for the short <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> long term should<br />
orecede the restoration of these ab<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>oned l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s. Several
66 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
SUSTAINABLE UPLAND RICE-BASED CROPPING<br />
Upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice (or dryl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice) grows on about 20.4 Mha, which represents<br />
about 14 % of the'world^s rice area. Numerous subsistence farmers grow<br />
upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice, mostly on poor, well-drained soil with <strong>an</strong> erratic rainfall <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
under shifting or perm<strong>an</strong>ent cultivation, or as a pioneer crop. <strong>Rice</strong> is<br />
grown either as a monocrop or in crop mixtures in the mont<strong>an</strong>e regions<br />
of the Far East, in the humid tropical belt of Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the subhumid<br />
savarmas of Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Latin America, with average yields r<strong>an</strong>ging from<br />
1 to 1.5 t ha'^ (Coulter, 1994). These areas which are marginal for rice<br />
production are expected to be grown to rice in the medium term, as long<br />
as the production from lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s fails to meet the dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>. The major<br />
problems of the sustainability of upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice production in the humid<br />
zone include soil erosion, soil acidity, deficiency of nutrients, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> weed<br />
infestation in intensive cultivation. The conventional solution to this<br />
problem is to practice arable cropping for a short cycle in partially cleared<br />
l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>scapes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to turn them over to bush (bush fallow) for a longer<br />
period. With mounting population pressure on l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, fallow periods are<br />
progressively reduced <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soil physical properties are rendered<br />
unsuitable for arable farming. Improper soil m<strong>an</strong>agement has led to soil<br />
erosion, degradation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> deforestation in m<strong>an</strong>y parts of the world.<br />
The principal measure to improve upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice cropping systems is<br />
water <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soil conservation. Water conservation should be emphasized<br />
with techniques of minimum tillage, bunding, weeding, proper pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
deirsity, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mulching <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> contour cultivation. The principle for soil<br />
erosion control is to provide a continuous vegetal cover throughout the<br />
year to diminish rainfall intensity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> runoff (P<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>e, Tr<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ton That<br />
inFAO,1994).<br />
The alley cropping system is a recent innovation whereby the<br />
perennial bush vegetation is replaced by leguminous shrubs which are<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ted in org<strong>an</strong>ized rows between which food crops are raised (K<strong>an</strong>g,<br />
et al, 1990). The composition of the alleys could eventually be modified<br />
so as to generate income. Alley cropping permits a continuous<br />
cultivation of arable crops, with the alleys providing the mulching<br />
materials where they are most needed. Mulch minimizes the direct<br />
impact of rain on the fragile tropical soil. On decomposition, the org<strong>an</strong>ic<br />
residue supplies nitrogen to the soil. Green leaf m<strong>an</strong>uring <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> alley<br />
cropping are just as relev<strong>an</strong>t for the production of small rumin<strong>an</strong>ts<br />
(sheep <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> goats) as for rice in the hydromorphic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> freely drained rice<br />
l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s of tropical Africa. M<strong>an</strong>y of the leguminous shrubs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> trees are
The integrated approach to rice farming must satisfy both economic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
ecological considerations, which bal<strong>an</strong>ce the costs at farm level with<br />
those for society, The economic viability of technology will determine its<br />
accept<strong>an</strong>ce by farmers. When technology is also environment friendly, it<br />
minimizes the costs to society. Improved technology permits the<br />
substitution of the more expensive resources by the less expensive.<br />
Therefore, application of improved technology tends to bring down the<br />
unit cost of output in a production system <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>/or permit the exp<strong>an</strong>sion<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> diversification of enterprises.<br />
The efficiency of a rice production system is determined by the<br />
productivity of one or more of the following major factors: l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, water,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> labor. The relative import<strong>an</strong>ce of these factors varies from location to<br />
location. For example, the productivity of l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is <strong>an</strong> import<strong>an</strong>t<br />
consideration in the Asi<strong>an</strong> hiunid <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subhumid tropics where l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is<br />
scarce. In semiarid Asia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sahel countries, the productivity of water<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> assume <strong>an</strong> equal import<strong>an</strong>ce. In Asi<strong>an</strong> countries where rural<br />
employment is scarce, the productivity of labor assumes less import<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
th<strong>an</strong> in countries of West Africa where labor scarcity is acute. The<br />
productivity of water is rarely taken into account when evaluating rice<br />
farVmolno-ips Althniiah irrigation is reallv. <strong>an</strong> exoensive<br />
S.y. Shastry et at. 67<br />
Crop rotation is <strong>an</strong> age-old method of maintaining soil fertility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
is extremely relev<strong>an</strong>t for upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice. The improved rice-pasture system<br />
in Latin America (i.e., one year of rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> three years of pasture)<br />
involves block or strip rotation: <strong>an</strong> upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> field is divided into several<br />
blocks or strips, each of which is cultivated with <strong>an</strong> upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> crop,<br />
including upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice, in a given year. In West Africa, the establishment<br />
of a food crop legume such as Vigna spp. in association with or after<br />
upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice is a promising system for sustainable upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice cultivation.<br />
Progress in rice <strong>research</strong> in this agroecology has been slowly achieved<br />
at the national <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> international level. Fimdamental physiological<br />
features of upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice should be studied to shed more light on the work<br />
being done in varietal improvement <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> agronomy. More productive <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
profitable upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice farming systems must adapt to local environments<br />
as substitutes for slash-<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>-bum cultivation. Subsistence living leaves<br />
small farmers little room for taking risks, New approaches are needed,<br />
including national policy reorientation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> politicial will, in order to<br />
stabilize <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reduce vulnerable upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice areas <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> make them more<br />
economic, productive <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sustainable when exploited (Tr<strong>an</strong>, 1986).<br />
SOCIOECONOMIC VIABILITY
68 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
risk-prone areas. It is only in exceptional circumst<strong>an</strong>ces (e.g. in<br />
groundwater exploitation) that farmers bear the real cost of irrigation.<br />
As a consequence, water-use efficiency in rice farming is appallingly<br />
low. The sustainability of m<strong>an</strong>y irrigation projects has, therefore, been<br />
seriously questioned.<br />
A major technological breakthrough is the adaptation of semidwarf,<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t-type cultivars to the tropics. The pl<strong>an</strong>t architectural attributes of<br />
the semidwarf gene in the variety Deo-Geo-Woo-Gen have contributed<br />
to <strong>an</strong> improved interception of solar radiation by the tropical rice pl<strong>an</strong>t.<br />
This is perhaps the most signific<strong>an</strong>t low-cost <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> environment-friendly<br />
technological adv<strong>an</strong>ce in rice farming this century.<br />
TECHNOLOGICAL ORIENTATION AND RISK MANAGEMENT<br />
Adv<strong>an</strong>ces in basic sciences have opened up fresh avenues for the<br />
development of new technologies. Research org<strong>an</strong>ization has assumed <strong>an</strong><br />
interdisciplinary task-force approach to resolve a problem <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> innovate<br />
solutions. Initially, emphasis was on the twinning of physical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
biological sciences. Towards the end of this century, this interdisciplinary<br />
ring was extended to economists, <strong>an</strong>thropologists <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> environmentalists.<br />
Application of production technologies culminated in the<br />
green revolution, which brought into focus the awareness <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> concerns<br />
for issues such as risks in production, equity in income distribution,<br />
economic sustainability, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> impact on the environment.<br />
Conceptualization of design, generation, tr<strong>an</strong>sfer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> evaluation of<br />
technologies has thus emerged as a collective responsibility of biology,<br />
physics, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> social scientists. There is a need for further refinement of<br />
the farming systems approach to <strong>research</strong> through incorporation of<br />
macroeconomic goals, scrutiny of economic sustainability, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sensitivity<br />
to environmental issues. This reorientation arises from the fact that <strong>an</strong><br />
improvement in technology often has system-wide implications <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
affects public policy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> investment. In addition, rice development<br />
c<strong>an</strong>not be considered in isolation but needs to be placed in the perspective<br />
of overall economic development.<br />
Farming as <strong>an</strong> enterprise has always had to reckon with <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reconcile<br />
<strong>an</strong> element of risk. The magnitude of what is at risk increases with every<br />
incremental ch<strong>an</strong>ge in production. The HYV technology c<strong>an</strong> be shown to<br />
be robust in <strong>an</strong> agronomic sense due to its stable perform<strong>an</strong>ce over a wide<br />
r<strong>an</strong>ge of climatic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> m<strong>an</strong>agerial situations. Yet it does not automatically<br />
follow that the risk involved in adopting HYV technology is minimal. In<br />
reality, the risk taken by farmers using HYVs is proportional to the yield
The high growth rate in rice production during the green revolution was<br />
made possible by the appropriate measures taken by international <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
national authorities. Sustainable rice production, c<strong>an</strong> also be achieved,<br />
therefore, with appropriate policies to protect natural resources <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
mobilize hum<strong>an</strong> resources <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> capital for a rational exploitation of<br />
existing l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> new l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reclamation. Policy measures such as<br />
taxation of resource utilization <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> price regulation create a favorable<br />
market environment for sustainable rice production. For example, the<br />
imposition of l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>-use taxes coupled with incentive prices for forestry<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fishery products encourage the shift from rice production in<br />
unfavorable areas such as upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> m<strong>an</strong>grove l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s to agroforestry,<br />
wildlife reserves, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fishery activities. The application of volumetric<br />
fees for irrigation water will encourage farmers to maintain irrigation<br />
c<strong>an</strong>als <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> economize in water use. Favorable market prices <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
conditions encourage farmers to adopt appropriate production<br />
techniques <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> farming systems.<br />
The need for sustainable agricultural production is more import<strong>an</strong>t<br />
in China th<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>ywhere else. Chinese scientists, development officials,<br />
politici<strong>an</strong>s <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> farmers have responded to this need with concerted<br />
'"phasing" approaches; in each phase various technologies have been<br />
integrated into packages. The first phase was initiated in 1950, at which<br />
time the following measures were popularized: use of improved varieties;<br />
growing of strong <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> healthy seedlings; intensive l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> preparation;<br />
application of proper pl<strong>an</strong>t densities; bal<strong>an</strong>ced fertilizer application;<br />
rational irrigation; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pest <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> disease control. During the second<br />
Hpvelonment of double cropping rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the concepts of three<br />
S.V. Shastry et at. 69<br />
magnitude of yield losses (in actual, not percentage terms) that<br />
epidemics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> epiphytotics c<strong>an</strong> inflict on a higher-level production<br />
system is much higher th<strong>an</strong> that of traditional low-production systems.<br />
The foregoing discussion does not imply <strong>an</strong> ab<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>onment of existing<br />
<strong>research</strong> establishment de novo of institutions m<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ated to conduct<br />
<strong>research</strong> on environment-friendly <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> economically sustainable technologies.<br />
A ch<strong>an</strong>ge in orientation is what is needed. As previously stated,<br />
there are no new technological leads available which meet the new<br />
goals. What is initially expected is that there will be a shift to the<br />
conventional technologies <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> practices which went out of fashion with<br />
the advent of seemingly inexpensive chemical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mech<strong>an</strong>ical technologies.<br />
This may be a tr<strong>an</strong>sient phase, which then gives way to major<br />
breakthroughs from biotechnological <strong>research</strong>.<br />
NATIONAL POLICIES FOR SUSTAINABLE RICE PRODUCTION
At the practical level, sustainable rice production is possible with<br />
consistent <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> concrete programs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> projects which take into account<br />
both the welfare of farmers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the conservation of natural resources.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> production projects such as swamp rice development, reclamation of<br />
m<strong>an</strong>grove rice areas <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> improvement of rice systems (e.g. deepwater,<br />
rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> irrigated) should be pl<strong>an</strong>ned <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
implemented with the following <strong>priorities</strong>:<br />
• Consideration of the sociopolitico-cultural setting, economic<br />
environment <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ecology to ensure the feasibility, profitability,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sustainability of the program <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its accept<strong>an</strong>ce by farmers.<br />
• Conformity with current national policies <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> laws (if <strong>an</strong>y) aimed<br />
at harmonizing economic returns <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> resource conservation. If<br />
such policies <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> laws do not exist, they should be established.<br />
• Promotion of the application of technologies requiring less fossil<br />
energy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> imported inputs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, at the same time, encouragement<br />
of the utilization of local resources <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> renewable energy which<br />
aim to help farmers become self-reli<strong>an</strong>t in production activities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
70 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
crops a year <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> high-yielding crops were emphasized. By noting the<br />
low outputs of individual technologies^ emphasis was placed on <strong>an</strong><br />
integrated approach encompassing l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> development, fertilization,<br />
improved cultivation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> improved seed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cropping systems during<br />
the third phase. During the fourth phase, in 1980, hybrid rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hybrid<br />
maize were popularized, with emphasis on multiple cropping <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> use<br />
of improved seed-growing techniques. The fifth phase, in 1985,<br />
prompted establishment of market correction measures. These<br />
integrated policy measures have increased crop yield signific<strong>an</strong>tly <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
enabled China to be not only self-sufficient, but also <strong>an</strong> exporter of rice<br />
(W<strong>an</strong>g in FAO, 1990).<br />
Similarly, in Indonesia integrated policies comprising the<br />
introduction of proven technologies, together with agricultural<br />
extension, input distribution, b<strong>an</strong>king services <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cooperatives, have<br />
been the key factors in successful sustainable rice production (Dudung,<br />
1994).<br />
In the long term, sustainable rice production needs comprehensive<br />
taxation law <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> price regulation to prevent undesirable influences from<br />
other sectors of the economy; for example, the silting of reservoirs by<br />
deforestation of watershed areas, the dumping of toxic materials from<br />
industrial <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mining sectors in agricultural l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> water, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
unchecked exp<strong>an</strong>sion of housing construction on prime irrigated l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s.<br />
FORMULATION OF PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
S.V. Shastry et at. 71<br />
• Establishment of indicators <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> frameworks for information<br />
collection^ relating to the monitoring <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> evaluation of project<br />
implementation as well as the integrity of the environment <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
population's welfare as rice development <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> population<br />
progress.<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
The application of science <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> technology to rice farming has so far<br />
progressed in the direction of relying on nonrenewable natural resources<br />
such as fossil fuel, of which there is not <strong>an</strong> unlimited supply. Therefore,<br />
the pattern of development that has given prosperity to m<strong>an</strong>y developed<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> some developing countries is unlikely to be accessible to those<br />
countries which have yet to modernize <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> improve the efficiency of rice<br />
farming. There is a need in all rice-growing countries to improve the<br />
efficiency of agrochemicals <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to modify production packages so as to<br />
give greater attention to renewable sources of energy. M<strong>an</strong>y of the crop<br />
production <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> protection technologies that prevailed in the prefertilizer,<br />
prepesticide era need to be reexamined in this ch<strong>an</strong>ged context.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> production should not be viewed in isolation but as a part of<br />
holistic farming systems in which the farmer's income <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> welfare as<br />
well as the diversity of the social, biological, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> physical environment<br />
should be integrated into the design of appropriate technologies. The<br />
intensified monocropping rice systems are still in need of diversification<br />
to maximize the opportunities to recycle products, avoid entropy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
waste <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rejuvenate degraded rice soils caused by continuous flooding.<br />
Technological adv<strong>an</strong>cements are useful when accomp<strong>an</strong>ied by<br />
appropriate national policies, which are supported by consistent <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
concrete programs. Therefore, in the long run sustainable rice production<br />
requires the formulation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> implementation of relev<strong>an</strong>t programs for<br />
rice <strong>research</strong>, development, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> production.<br />
FAO has a crucial role to play in articulating the paradigm shift in<br />
rice farming, clarifying the sustainability goals <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ecological concerns,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> presenting a r<strong>an</strong>ge of technological, institutional <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> m<strong>an</strong>agerial<br />
options that enable its member cotmtries to meet the current needs for<br />
rice without compromising the requirements of future generations.<br />
References<br />
Barghouti, L.G. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Umali, D. In: World B<strong>an</strong>k Technical Paper No. 180, pp. 107-126.<br />
Washington, DC, World B<strong>an</strong>k.<br />
Ch<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ler, R.F. 1979. <strong>Rice</strong> m the Tropics; A Guide to the Development of a National Program.
72 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Génetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Choudhury, P,C. 1996. Integrated rice-fish culture in Asia with special reference to<br />
deepwater rice. In: Proc. 18th Session IRC, 5-9 September 1994, Rome.<br />
Coulter, J.K. 1994. Upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice production <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its environmental impacts. IRC Newsl., 39; 41-<br />
49.<br />
De Datta, S.K. 1994. Sustainable rice production: challenges <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> opportunities. IRC Newsl.,<br />
39: 209-219.<br />
Dialla, B.E. 1994. The adoption of soil conservation practices in Burkina Faso. Indigenous<br />
Know. Dev, Mon. 1:10.<br />
Dudung, A.A. 1994. Modernizing rice farming; Indonesia's experience in conducting the<br />
green revolution, IRC Newsl 39; 265-275.<br />
FAO, 1989. Sustainable agricultural production: implications for international agricultural<br />
<strong>research</strong>, FAO Research <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Technology Paper No. 4, Rome.<br />
FAO. 1990, Technology for sustainable crop production <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> agricultural development in<br />
China. A consult<strong>an</strong>cy report submitted to FAO/RAPA, 47 pp.<br />
FAO. 1992, Research <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> development strategies for the increase <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sustained production<br />
of rice in Asia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Pacific region, FAO/RAPA; 1992/17.<br />
FAO. 1993, FAO Production Yearbook. 1992. Rome.<br />
FAO. 1994a, Mission report on the conference Temperate <strong>Rice</strong>: Achievement <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Potential,<br />
Y<strong>an</strong>co, NSW, Australia, 21-24 February 1994, Rome.,<br />
FAO. 1994b. Improved Upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Farming Systems. Rome, 117 pp.<br />
Flirm, J.C., De Datta, S.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Labad<strong>an</strong>, E. 1982, An <strong>an</strong>alysis of long-term rice yield in a wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
soil. Field Crop Res., 5: 201^216.<br />
Harwood, R.R. 1988. The contribution of agro-ecology to development of a sustainable<br />
agriculture. Paper presented at the colloquy Completing the Food Chain: Multisectoral<br />
Strategies for Combating Hunger Malnutrition. Smithsoni<strong>an</strong> Institute, Washington,<br />
DC, 4 October 1988.<br />
IRRI. 1984. Terminology for the rice growing environment. M<strong>an</strong>ila.<br />
IRRI. 1993. <strong>Rice</strong> in crucial environments (IRRI 1992-1993). M<strong>an</strong>ila, 65 pp.<br />
K<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iah, A,, Ton That, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Carpenter , A.J. 1990. Area ch<strong>an</strong>ges <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> system choices for<br />
irrigation in Asia 1990-2000. IRC Newsl., 39: 23-25.<br />
K<strong>an</strong>g, B.T., Reynolds, L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Atta-Krah, A.N. 1990. Alley cropping .Adv. Agron. 43:315-359.<br />
Lacy, J. 1994. <strong>Rice</strong> check: a collaborative learning for increasing productivity. Abstract<br />
presented at the conference Temperate <strong>Rice</strong>: Achievement <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Potential, Y<strong>an</strong>co, NSW,<br />
Australia, 21-24 February 1994.<br />
Mitchell, D .0 .1987. <strong>Rice</strong> market prospects'to the year 2000. Paper presented at the seminar<br />
Recent <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Future Movement in World <strong>Rice</strong> Prices, Jakarta, Indonesia, 13-14 J<strong>an</strong>uary<br />
1987,<br />
Roy, R.N, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pederson, 0,S, 1990. Economic use of fertilizer for rice. IRC Newsl, 39:118-<br />
126,<br />
Rutt<strong>an</strong>, V.W. 1988. Sustainability is not enough. Notes presented at the symposium Creating<br />
Sustainable Agriculture for the Future, 30 April 1988, University of Minnesota.<br />
Ton That, T. 1982. Potential <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> constraints of rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice development in tropical<br />
Africa. IRC Newsl, 31(1): 1-6.<br />
Ton That, T. 1992. Le programme de riz hybrid a la FAO, IRC Newsl, 41:51-59.<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>, D.V. 1986. An overview of upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice in the world. In: Progress in Upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research,<br />
M<strong>an</strong>ila IRRI p, 51-66.<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>, D.V. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ton That, T. 1994. Second generation of high-yielding rice varieties. IRC<br />
Newsl,39:127-132.<br />
Yao, C.L, 1992. Situation of the world rice market in 1991. IRC Newsl, 41:65-70.
* International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, P.O. Box 933,1099, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines.<br />
4<br />
Drought <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Submergence<br />
in <strong>Rice</strong> Production<br />
Osamu Ito"^, Gloria Cabuslay"^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ev<strong>an</strong>gelina Ella*<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> is grown in various agroecosystems defined on the basis of<br />
hydrology. The rice ecosystem c<strong>an</strong> be roughly classified into four types:<br />
irrigated, rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> deepwater. More th<strong>an</strong> half of<br />
the rice l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s are irrigated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nearly three-quarters of the rice<br />
production comes from this ecosystem. The irrigated ecosystem<br />
provides a micro-environment which is most favourable to rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> allows stable yields over time. If irrigation is not available, rice<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts would fully depend on water supply from rainfall <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> would<br />
often suffer from water deficit due to erratic rainfall, which makes grain<br />
production unstable <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> unpredictable. On the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, if the<br />
drainage system is not well developed, rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts are partially or fully<br />
submerged by water for variable periods of time depending on the<br />
intensity of rainfall. The deficit <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> excess of water (drought <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
submergence) are two major abiotic constraints which limit rice<br />
production signific<strong>an</strong>tly when rice cultivation moves out from the<br />
irrigated ecosystem.<br />
Drought, defined as a period of no rainfall or no irrigation that<br />
affects crop growth (H<strong>an</strong>son et al, 1995), has long been recognized as the<br />
primary constraint to rainfed rice production (De Data et al., 1975}
<strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Mackill et at, 1996). Drought causes a reduction in biomass <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
consequently^ a reduction in yield. Yield losses are more severe when<br />
drought occurs during the reproductive phase (Sarkarimg et ah, 1995).<br />
Flooding is a serious constraint to pl<strong>an</strong>t growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> survival in rainfed<br />
lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> deepwater areas because excessive water results in partial<br />
or complete submergence of the pl<strong>an</strong>t. Partial submergence occurs when<br />
40-99% of the shoot is under water (Setter et ah, 1987), Adverse effects of<br />
flooding cover approximately 2,2 Mha of rice l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> which includes 1.5<br />
Mha of flash-flood areas of rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 5 Mha of deepwater<br />
rice (Khush^ 1984). Depending on the water depth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> duration^<br />
flooding in rice fields may be categorized into two types (Ram et ah,<br />
1996): (i) flash or intermittent <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> (ii) stagn<strong>an</strong>t or prolonged.<br />
I. CHARACTERISTICS OF DROUGHT ENVIRONMENTS<br />
There is a wide r<strong>an</strong>ge of water-stress environments in rainfed ricegrowing<br />
areas, differing in both timing <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> intensity of water stress<br />
(Fukai <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cooper, 1995). These environments c<strong>an</strong> be grouped into two<br />
major categories, namely upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>. The rainfed<br />
lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ecosysteny accounts for 27% of the total rice area in the world<br />
(Sarkarung et ah, 1995). In South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia, rice is grown on<br />
approximately 40 Mha with yields averaging only 1.5 t ha'^ (Wade et ah,<br />
1995). On the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice grows on about 17 Mha worldwide<br />
with upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> areas contributing only 4% to total world rice production<br />
(IRRI, 1996).<br />
A. Upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> areas may have deep soils with high extractable soil water<br />
content, although water-stress development is generally more severe<br />
there th<strong>an</strong> in lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> areas (Fukai <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cooper, 1995). Furthermore,<br />
upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> areas are characterized by extreme diversity of soils <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
topography. The complexity of the ecosystem is well represented by<br />
cultivation of widely differing traditional cultivars with a variety of<br />
farming practices (IRRI, 1990).<br />
The major problems involving upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice cultivation c<strong>an</strong> be<br />
grouped into three categories (IRRI, 1990):<br />
(1 ) environmental problems, e.g., soil degradation, deforestation,<br />
lack of capital to purchase inputs, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> poor access to markets;<br />
(2 ) crop problems, e.g., poor m<strong>an</strong>agement, lack of efficient tools, high<br />
weed infestation; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
(3 ) pl<strong>an</strong>t problems, e.g., low yield potential, drought, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> blast<br />
damage.
Osamu Ito, Gloria Cabuslay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ev<strong>an</strong>gelina Ella 75<br />
B. Rainfed Lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> areas may be further grouped based on the presence or<br />
absence of a hardp<strong>an</strong> layer in the soil. The hardp<strong>an</strong> which develops as a<br />
consequence of puddling <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> construction of bunds in lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
conditions results in better retention of surface water, which delays<br />
development of pl<strong>an</strong>t water stress. In areas where puddling is not<br />
practised or where the soil is s<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>y, a hardp<strong>an</strong> may not develop,<br />
resulting in a large percolation loss of rain water (Fukai <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cooper,<br />
1995).<br />
As a result of hydrologic conditions which may fluctuate from<br />
submergence to drought, various systems of crop establishment are<br />
employed in rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, from direct dryseeding to tr<strong>an</strong>spl<strong>an</strong>ting<br />
(Wade et ah, 1995). Harvesting a rice crop is largely determined by the<br />
time at which the monsoon arrives <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the amount of rain that falls<br />
(Mackill et ah, 1996).<br />
Drought is m<strong>an</strong>ifested by the uncertain onset of rains at rice sowing<br />
or tr<strong>an</strong>spl<strong>an</strong>ting <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> by prolonged dry periods during the reproductive<br />
phase. Farmers practice direct seeding in their upper rice-fields using<br />
traditional, drought-toler<strong>an</strong>t, medium-statured cultivars to get <strong>an</strong> early<br />
harvest even if a mid-season drought occurs.<br />
Aside from hydrologic conditions, other problems which affect crop<br />
growth in the area are the occurrence of diseases such as blast in rice<br />
(Fukai <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cooper, 1995) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> low soil fertility (Mackill et ah, 1996), since<br />
farmers minimize inputs because the risk of water-related stress is high.<br />
II. EFFECT OF DROUGHT STRESS ON PLANT GROWTH<br />
A. Effect on Morphological Characters<br />
1. SHOOT<br />
A general effect of drought stress is a reduction in size of pl<strong>an</strong>ts (stunting<br />
or growth retardation). The height of the pl<strong>an</strong>t is particularly affected<br />
(Laude, 1971). According to (Kramer, 1969), leaf area, cell size, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
intercellular volume usually decrease, while cutinization, hairiness, vein<br />
density, stomatal frequency, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thickness of both palisade layer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
entire leaves usually increase. The amount of epicuticular wax, a<br />
signific<strong>an</strong>t component of the cuticle, is higher in dryl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>-adapated rices<br />
th<strong>an</strong> in irrigated rices. This often results in relatively thick, leathery,<br />
highly cutinized foliage, generally described as xeromorphic.<br />
In rice, leaf rolling <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> death of leaves are criteria found useful in<br />
assessing levels of drought toler<strong>an</strong>ce in a large-scale screening (Ch<strong>an</strong>g
<strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
et al, 1974). Singh et al. (1995) reported that drought imposition stopped<br />
leaf elongation when the soil moisture tensions exceeded 40-60 kPa in<br />
all establishment methods studied. Leaf rolling was found to reduce leaf<br />
area index by almost 50% to compared unrolled leaves. This was the<br />
primary cause for decline in tr<strong>an</strong>spiration rate in the initial stages of<br />
drought imposition. Further decline in tr<strong>an</strong>^iration was caused by<br />
stomatal closure at soil water tensions of 10^ kPa irrespective of the<br />
establishment method.<br />
Studies on root-related characteristics have elicited much interest from<br />
scientists because it is through roots that rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts take up moisture,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a wide r<strong>an</strong>ge of varietal differences exists in the rice root system<br />
(Mackill et al., 1996). Deeper roots may permit access to water that is not<br />
available to other pl<strong>an</strong>ts with a shallower root system (Moreshet et ah,<br />
1996). Furthermore, drought stress causes pronounced ch<strong>an</strong>ges in root<br />
structure, such as increased br<strong>an</strong>ching (Yamauchi et ah, 1996) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
density (Eghball <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mar<strong>an</strong>ville, 1993). However, most root studies<br />
focus only on morphology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ignore dynamic physiological activities<br />
in roots, e.g. respiration. Root respiration merits attention because it is<br />
closely linked to metabolic processes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> uptake of water <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nutrients<br />
(Ito et ah, 1996). The role of root respiration in adaptation of pl<strong>an</strong>ts to<br />
drought stress has not yet been fully explored.<br />
Drought-affected pl<strong>an</strong>ts generally exhibit a small root system<br />
configuration <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in m<strong>an</strong>y cases the reduction in size of root system is<br />
directly proportional to the magnitude of water shortage (Yamauchi et<br />
ah, 1996). Lilley <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fukai (1994a) found that root growth ceased in all<br />
the rice cultivars studied when water deficit was imposed at either the<br />
vegetative or reproductive stage. Cruz et ah (1986) reported that water<br />
stress decreased root length of IR54, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> this was attributed to increased<br />
soil mech<strong>an</strong>ical imped<strong>an</strong>ce. Morita <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Abe (1996) observed that roots<br />
of upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice respond to drought conditions with <strong>an</strong> increase in degree<br />
of br<strong>an</strong>ching.<br />
According to Slayter (1973), two types of effects of water deficit on<br />
root development c<strong>an</strong> be expected, the first being a reduction in rates of<br />
meristematic activity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> root elongation directly associated with the<br />
level of internal water deficit; the second, <strong>an</strong> effect of suberization on the<br />
water <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nutrient uptake properties of the root system as a whole. As<br />
rates of root elongation are reduced, the rate of suberization exceeds the<br />
rate of elongation, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the nonsuberized zone is reduced, until it is<br />
virtually eliminated in nonelongating roots. This phenomenon, common<br />
under conditions of severe water stress, subst<strong>an</strong>tially reduces the<br />
effective surface of the roots <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their activity as absorbing org<strong>an</strong>s.
Osamu ItO/ Gloria Cabuslay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ev<strong>an</strong>gelina Ella 77<br />
B. Effect on Yield<br />
Lilley <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fukai (1994b) found that water deficit during vegetative<br />
growth caused <strong>an</strong> insignific<strong>an</strong>t reduction in grain yield but tended to<br />
delay p<strong>an</strong>icle initiation. On the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, water deficit imposed during<br />
the reproductive period reduced grain yield to 20-70% of the irrigated<br />
control. A slow growth rate during p<strong>an</strong>icle development reduced grain<br />
number <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> potential grain size, while cultivars which recovered<br />
quickly after water deficit had a relatively higher grain yield.<br />
Singh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ingram (1991) reported that water stress during booting<br />
to early grain filling caused the greatest yield losses of 77% in IR20, IR46,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR72. Stress treatments during three different growth stages<br />
reduced pl<strong>an</strong>t height, culms per pl<strong>an</strong>t, leaf area, grain yield components,<br />
grain yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> daily as well as seasonal évapotr<strong>an</strong>spiration.<br />
In a study using 20 early-maturing rice cultivars, severe drought<br />
stress prolonged the maturity period of all cultivars by 2-27 days<br />
(Dikshit et ah, 1987). The long dry period <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the prolonged maturity<br />
period reduced the grain yield by 10-91%. Signific<strong>an</strong>t correlation was<br />
found between maturity prolongation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yield reduction due to<br />
drought stress.<br />
According to Dey <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Upadhyaya (1996), of the three critical stages<br />
of growth—seedling, vegetative <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>thesis—drought during <strong>an</strong>thesis<br />
is the most serious <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> devastating to yields because of its adverse<br />
effects on pollination <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the flowers become sterile. The decreased<br />
sugar delivery to reproductive tissues upon inhibition of photosynthesis<br />
due to drought stress triggers metabolic lesions leading to failure of<br />
male gametophyte development (Saini, 1997).<br />
C. Effect on Pl<strong>an</strong>t Functions<br />
1. P h o t o s y n t h e s is<br />
Photosynthesis is the driving force of pl<strong>an</strong>t productivity. The ability to<br />
maintain the rate of photosynthetic CO2 fixation under environmental<br />
stresses is fundamental to the mainten<strong>an</strong>ce of pl<strong>an</strong>t growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
production (Lawlor, 1995). Reduced biomass results in a small<br />
photosynthetic area, leading to a reduced assimilate storage in<br />
vegetative org<strong>an</strong>s which ultimately limits potential grain yield even if<br />
favourable conditions return (Begg, 1980).<br />
Drought has short-term as well as long-term aftereffects on<br />
photosynthesis (Boyer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mcpherson, 1976). In the short-term,<br />
photosynthesis may be affected by ch<strong>an</strong>ges at the chloroplast level <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>/<br />
or by stomatal movement. Two kinds of aftereffects appear following
<strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
rewatering of the pl<strong>an</strong>ts. First, there may be incomplete recovery of leafwater<br />
potential, which causes photosynthesis to remain below the levels<br />
of the control. This appears to be caused by breaks in water columns or<br />
other modifications of the pathway for water tr<strong>an</strong>sport in the pl<strong>an</strong>t.<br />
Second, there may be a direct aftereffect of drought on the<br />
photosynthetic process. Both depend on the severity of desiccation: the<br />
more severe desication is, the more severe are its aftereffects.<br />
Jones (1981) reported that soil moisture stress causing stomatal<br />
closure for periods of up to 8 days during the critical period from 2 0<br />
days before flowering to 1 0 days after flowering has little effect on the<br />
percentage of filled grain. Longer periods of stomatal closure c<strong>an</strong><br />
seriously affect yields.<br />
At the biochemical level, reports point to the effect of drought stress<br />
on photosystems, more on PSII th<strong>an</strong> PSI. He et al. (1995) found that<br />
damage to PSII photochemistry in waterstressed wheat leaves is brought<br />
on by a decreased rate of synthesis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> increased degradation of PSII<br />
proteins.<br />
In a review, Lawlor (1995) suggested the following sequence of<br />
events when C3 leaves are exposed to increasing water deficit:<br />
(a) Mild stress or partial loss (25%) of turgor <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a small decrease in<br />
relative water content or RWC (100% down to 90%) has little effect on<br />
photosynthetic metabolism. At this stage, the main limitation in<br />
photosynthesis is the reduction in diffusive conduct<strong>an</strong>ce caused by<br />
stomatal closure <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> decreased Q (intercellular CO2 concentration).<br />
Accumulation of sucrose <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> starch may occur, reflecting the<br />
mainten<strong>an</strong>ce of a positive bal<strong>an</strong>ce between synthesis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> consumption<br />
despite reduced photosynthesis.<br />
(b) Further loss of turgor <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reduction of RWC below 85%<br />
decreases stomatal conduct<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> potential CO2 assimilation rate due<br />
to metabolic alterations, but Cj may continue to decrease. The low Cj<br />
leads to <strong>an</strong> increase of the In vivo oxygenase/carboxylase ratio of<br />
Rubisco, causing a larger relative flux of carbon through the<br />
photorespiratory glycolate pathway. Increased photorespiration,<br />
relative to photosynthesis, recycles CO2 , consuming relatively more<br />
NADPH th<strong>an</strong> ATP.<br />
(c) Light-harvesting, electron tr<strong>an</strong>sport <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reduction of pyridine<br />
nucleotides <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other electron acceptors are little affected in the<br />
physiological r<strong>an</strong>ge of stress. The reduced to oxidized pyridine<br />
nucleotide ratio <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the size of the reduced pyridine nucleotide pool<br />
increase with moderate to servere stress.<br />
(d) ATP content decreases with moderate to severe stress due to<br />
impaired synthesis of ATP by the coupling factor, which is inhibited by<br />
the ionic conditions in the chloroplast. Consequently the ATP/reduced<br />
pyridine nucleotide ratio falls.
Osamu Ito, Gloria Cabuslay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ev<strong>an</strong>gelina Ella 79<br />
(e) Synthesis of RuBP is inhibited as a result of limited ATP supply^<br />
so the potential for CO2 assimilation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> photorespiration decreases<br />
progressively with developing stress <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> control shifts from CO2<br />
availability to RuBP synthesis.<br />
(f) Abnormal regulation of, or damage to enzymes is not the major<br />
lesion in photosynthetic metabolism.<br />
(g) CO2 assimilation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> synthesis of trióse phosphate, sucrose <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
starch decreases subst<strong>an</strong>tially while consumption of sucrose by<br />
respiration continues so that the total carbohydrate content of the leaves<br />
falls, starch more so th<strong>an</strong> sucrose.<br />
(h) The proportion of electron flow to O2 (Mehler reaction) increases,<br />
generating superoxide <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hydrogen peroxide which damage<br />
membr<strong>an</strong>es <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> enzymes. A greater proportion of the energy is<br />
dissipated by qj.jp (non-photochemical quenching) th<strong>an</strong> by qp (quenching<br />
due to photochemistry). Dissipation mech<strong>an</strong>isms (carotenoids,<br />
including the x<strong>an</strong>thophyll cycle <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>tioxid<strong>an</strong>t systems) become<br />
increasingly import<strong>an</strong>t, removing energy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reduct<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> destroying<br />
toxic compounds generated as energy is tr<strong>an</strong>sferred to unphysiological<br />
acceptors.<br />
(i) Severe water deficit causes subst<strong>an</strong>tial inhibition of<br />
photophosphorylation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a further decrease in ATP content. CO2<br />
assimilation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> photophosphorylation almost stop, respiratory<br />
processes dominate, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> C¡ rises greatly.<br />
(j) Excessive energy loads on the thylakoids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the detoxification<br />
systems eventually lead to membr<strong>an</strong>e damage <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> irreversible loss of<br />
photosynthesis. These processes may be linked to the accumulation of<br />
metabolites such as proline.<br />
2. C a r b o n P a r t it io n in g<br />
The term partitioning projects the concept of a central resource pool that<br />
is distributed among sinks (Dingkuhn <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kropff, 1996). Partitioning of<br />
assimilates ch<strong>an</strong>ges in the course of phenological development as<br />
different org<strong>an</strong>s are formed. In modern high-yielding varieties, the dry<br />
weight of the root system is similar to the shoot at the seedling stage but<br />
is only 1 0 % that of the shoot at flowering, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> even less at maturity.<br />
Boyer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> McPherson (1976) found that maize c<strong>an</strong> utilize previously<br />
accumulated dry matter for tr<strong>an</strong>slocation to the grain, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> suggested<br />
that photosynthetic activity before as well as during the grain-filling<br />
period was the import<strong>an</strong>t determin<strong>an</strong>t of grain yield during drought.<br />
The tr<strong>an</strong>slocation mech<strong>an</strong>ism, while having less photosynthate available<br />
for tr<strong>an</strong>sport, was itself relatively unaffected.<br />
The two stable endproducts of photosynthesis are sucrose <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
starch. Sucrose is synthesized in the cytoplasm <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> starch in the
<strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
chloroplast of mesophyll cells. According to V<strong>an</strong> der Werf (1996)/<br />
primary regulation of leaf carbon partitioning between sucrose <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
starch is believed to reside in the cytosol. Considering the low carbon<br />
supply under drought conditions, a shift in chemical partitioning of<br />
carbon occurs in favour of sucrose accumulation or starch<br />
remobilization in the leaf cells of stressed pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Continued sucrose<br />
synthesis is therefore required for export while sucrose accumulation is<br />
essential for osmotic adjustment during stress.<br />
V<strong>an</strong> der Werf (1996) further stated that low carbon supplies coupled<br />
with the need for some carbon to be used to osmotic adjustment rather<br />
th<strong>an</strong> growth/storage would necessitate modifications in sink dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> alterations in shoot-to-root ratio <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> source-to-sink relations. Most<br />
often ch<strong>an</strong>ges in the ratio are in favor of root growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reduced sink<br />
load, both of which are reflected in increased root-to-shoot ratio. Ma<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Lu (1990) observed promotion of root growth in hybrid rice by mild<br />
water stress, probably coupled with improved oxygen supply.<br />
In wheat, Nicolas et al. (1985) reported that under control conditions,<br />
the distribution of carbon among ear, stem, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> roots did not ch<strong>an</strong>ge<br />
during the experimental period. The grains acted as the main sink with<br />
daily carbon increment 3 times that of the stem <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 4 to 6 times that of<br />
the roots. Under mild drought stress, the sink strength of the roots<br />
increased relative to that of the grains <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stem in the more toler<strong>an</strong>t<br />
cultivar. However, under more severe stress, roots did not compete well<br />
with grains.<br />
3 . W a t e r -u s e e f f ic ie n c y (W U E )<br />
Evapotr<strong>an</strong>spiration studies on rice revealed that 759-1150 kg of water,<br />
with a me<strong>an</strong> of 875 kg, were required to produce 1 kg of rough rice grain<br />
(Shih et al, 1982). Considering that this resource is limiting in rainfed<br />
environments, a desirable trait for a rice cultivar to maintain growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
yield in drought-prone areas is to have efficient water use. Water-use<br />
efficiency of the whole pl<strong>an</strong>t is usually defined as the total dry matter<br />
produced per unit of water used (Boyer, 1996). At the leaf level WUE<br />
(also termed tr<strong>an</strong>spiration efficiency) is defined as the ratio of the rates<br />
of net carbon assimilation to tr<strong>an</strong>spiration (V<strong>an</strong> den Boogard et al,<br />
1995). WUE of tropical upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice was improved by stomatal closure<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leaf rolling during mild <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> intermediate water stress (Dingkuhn<br />
et al, 1989).<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>spiration efficiency is indirectly measured as carbon isotope<br />
discrimination (A), based on the relative contents of <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t tissues. The hypothesis is that cells accumulate relatively more<br />
th<strong>an</strong> because ^^C0 2 is lighter, hence diffuses more rapidly th<strong>an</strong>
Osamu ItO/ Gloria Cabuslay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ev<strong>an</strong>gelina Ella 81<br />
^^C0 2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is fixed more rapidly by Rubisco (Boyer, 1996). The unused C<br />
diffuses out according to the extent of stomatal opening. The inward<br />
diffusion <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> use of ^ ^ 0 2 correlates with photosynthesis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> dry mass<br />
while the outward diffusion of ^^C0 2 correlates with tr<strong>an</strong>spiration. Thus<br />
the relative uptake of <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> correlates with water-use efficiency.<br />
This development renewed interest in water-use efficiency studies<br />
which usually involved rigorous daily weight measurements. With the<br />
availability of mass spectrometers to measure relative contents of ^^C0 2<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ^^C0 2 , WUE c<strong>an</strong> now be determined with ease even under field<br />
conditions, as pl<strong>an</strong>t parts c<strong>an</strong> be harvested <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> immediately <strong>an</strong>alyzed<br />
for relative uptakes of ^^C0 2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ^^C0 2 -<br />
Farquhar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Richards (1984) reported that pl<strong>an</strong>ts with high WUE<br />
had high ratios of to or less discrimination against<br />
According to Boyer (1996), subst<strong>an</strong>tial water limitation usually gives a<br />
negative relationship between discrimination <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> WUE but under<br />
relatively favorable conditions, the relationship tends to become less<br />
negative or even positive. Among 28 upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rices with different wateruse<br />
efficiencies, Dingkuhn et aL (1991) reported carbon isotope<br />
discrimination to correlate negatively with WUE across all cultivars <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
within japónica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> aus groüps, but not among indica rices. Comparison<br />
of experimental data with varietal screening results of the International<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (IRRI) revealed that cultivars with good seedling<br />
vigor had high WUE <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> low discrimination.<br />
4. R o o t r e s p ir a t io n<br />
Roots appear to be the poor relations when it comes to the allocation of a<br />
limited supply of photosynthate (Wardlaw, 1990). A decrease in root<br />
growth is commonly mentioned as the primary result of drought stress<br />
(Pardales <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kono, 1990). This might lead to a reduced respiratory<br />
activity in the roots since rate of root respiration was found to correlate<br />
positively with the relative growth rate of roots (Poorter et al., 1991).<br />
Indeed, exposure to a dry soil led to a gradual decline in root respiration<br />
of Triticum aestivum, predomin<strong>an</strong>tly due to the engagement of the<br />
alternative pathway (Nicolas et at, 1985). The decline in respiration<br />
correlates with the accumulation of org<strong>an</strong>ic solutes,<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>t mitochondria possess a br<strong>an</strong>ched electron tr<strong>an</strong>sport chain that<br />
contains two pathways: the cytochrome pathway <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the alternative<br />
pathway (Atkin et a/., 1995). Both the cy<strong>an</strong>ide-sensitive, SHAM<br />
(salicylhydroxamic acid)-resist<strong>an</strong>t cytochrome pathway <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
cy<strong>an</strong>ide-resist<strong>an</strong>t, SHAM-sensitive alternative pathway obtain their<br />
electrons from Qj. (reduced ubiquinone). However, in contrast to the<br />
cytochrome pathway, electron tr<strong>an</strong>sport from Q, to O2 via the alternative<br />
pathway does not lead to the synthesis of ATP. In addition, Millar et al
<strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
(1995) stated that the alternative pathway releases energy as heat which<br />
c<strong>an</strong>not be utilized for <strong>an</strong>y metabolic activity. Induction of the alternative<br />
pathway is generally found under stress conditions^, e.g. wounding of<br />
tissue, chilling, osmotic stress, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> drought (Wagner <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Krab, 1995). In<br />
wheat, although total root respiration decreased imder drought, less<br />
respiration took place via the alternative pathway, especially for the<br />
more toler<strong>an</strong>t cultivars (Nicolas et al, 1985).<br />
From titrations with specific inhibitors (especially cy<strong>an</strong>ide <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
hydroxamates), it was concluded that the cytochrome pathway is used<br />
preferentially <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that the alternative pathway acts as <strong>an</strong> overflow, only<br />
engaged when the cytochrome pathway is saturated (Wagner <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Krab,<br />
1995). Thus engagement of the alternative pathway in roots tends to<br />
decrease when the availability for respiration decreases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> increases<br />
when the dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for carbohydrates for other processes decreases<br />
■(Lambers ei al.,. 1991). However, recent studies suggest that the<br />
cytochrome pathway does not have to be saturated for the alternative<br />
pathway to be engaged; hence these studies are incompatible with the<br />
Bahr <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bonner (1973) hypothesis of a preferential pathway (Millar et<br />
al., 1995; Dry ei al., 1989).<br />
III. MECHANISMS OF DROUGHT RESISTANCE<br />
Drought resist<strong>an</strong>ce refers to those properties which enable pl<strong>an</strong>ts of a<br />
given genotype to grow <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reproduce (yield) normally under drought<br />
conditions (Ch<strong>an</strong>g et al, 1974), To achieve this, pl<strong>an</strong>ts develop certain<br />
morphological <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> physiological traits which adapt them better to water<br />
stress in rainfed areas. This is supported by the existence of "traditional"<br />
upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cultivars in the rice germplasm. Scientists<br />
have been trying for years to exploit these adaptive mech<strong>an</strong>isms in <strong>an</strong><br />
attempt to increase yields in rainfed environments. These mech<strong>an</strong>isms<br />
c<strong>an</strong> be classified into escape, ayoid<strong>an</strong>ce, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> toler<strong>an</strong>ce mech<strong>an</strong>isms.<br />
A. Escape Mech<strong>an</strong>ism<br />
According to OToole <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g (1978), drought escape is the most<br />
effective adaptive mech<strong>an</strong>ism as far as productivity is concerned. It<br />
aims at crop growth during the period of high rainfall <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> high soil<br />
water availability to escape the drought period (Fukai <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cooper,<br />
1995). One way of achieving this is to grow short-duration cultivars<br />
which tend to escape late-season drought (Wonprasaid et al., 1996).<br />
Another method is to use photoperiod-sensitive cultivars whose<br />
sensitive reproductive stages are photoperiodically controlled to
Osamu Ito, Gloria Cabuslay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ev<strong>an</strong>gelina Ella 83<br />
coincide with the peak monsoon season, allowing the crop to complete<br />
grain filling under Ihe adequate water regime (O'Toole <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g,<br />
1978). Most traditional rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rices are sensitive to<br />
photoperiod (Mackill et al., 1996).<br />
B. Avoid<strong>an</strong>ce Mech<strong>an</strong>ism<br />
Strategies for avoiding low pl<strong>an</strong>t water status during a drought period<br />
include extracting more water from the soil <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> using soil water slowly<br />
during the early stages of a drought period so that more is available in<br />
the later period (Fukai <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cooper, 1995). Some root <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> shoot<br />
characteristics that enh<strong>an</strong>ce uptake <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> conservation of water during a<br />
rainless period are leaf rolling, stomatal closure, thick cuticle<br />
development, prolific root system, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> deep roots (O'Toole <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g,<br />
1978; Samson et al, 1995).<br />
C. Toler<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Toler<strong>an</strong>ce of water stress, usually involves the development of low<br />
osmotic potentials, which characterize m<strong>an</strong>y pl<strong>an</strong>t species found in arid<br />
environments (Morg<strong>an</strong>, 1984). Osmotic adjustment, or accumulation of<br />
solutes by cells, is a process by which water potential c<strong>an</strong> be decreased<br />
without <strong>an</strong> accomp<strong>an</strong>ying decrease in turgor (Taiz <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zeiger, 1991).<br />
According to Taiz <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zeiger (1991), most of the osmotic adjustment<br />
c<strong>an</strong> usually be accounted for by increases in concentration of a variety of<br />
common solutes, including sugars, org<strong>an</strong>ic acids, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ions (especially<br />
K^). However, a high concentration of ions c<strong>an</strong> be severely inhibitory to<br />
enzymes so that this occurs mainly within the vacuoles, where the ions<br />
are kept out of contact with enzymes in the cytosol or subcellular<br />
org<strong>an</strong>elles. Because of this compartmentation of ions, some other solutes<br />
must accumulate in the cytoplasm to maintain water potential<br />
equilibrium within the cell. These other solutes, called compatible<br />
solutes, are org<strong>an</strong>ic compounds that do not interfere with enzyme<br />
functions. Proline is a commonly accumulated compatible solute; others<br />
are sugar alcohol, sorbitol, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a quaternary amine, glycine betaine.<br />
Nicolas et al (1985) found osmotic adjustment to be higher in roots of<br />
drought-toler<strong>an</strong>t wheat cultivar, with contribution four times that of<br />
sugars.<br />
Despite much <strong>research</strong> on the accumulation of proline <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other<br />
compatible solutes during stress, it remains unclear whether these<br />
accumulations are resist<strong>an</strong>ce mech<strong>an</strong>isms or symptoms of stress<br />
(Mackill, 1996). In general, scientists believe that these are consequences
84 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
of drought injury <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, therefore, selection for these has not been proven<br />
useful<br />
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION OF<br />
FLOODWATER<br />
The degree of flooding is determined by m<strong>an</strong>y variables such as rainfall<br />
pattern <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> intensity, topography of the location, soil properties, the<br />
drainage system <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> so on. Not only does the depth of floodwater but<br />
also its physicochemical characteristics (O2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CO2 concentration, pH,<br />
turbidity etc.) greatly affect pl<strong>an</strong>t survival during submergence. It has<br />
been noticed that in order to obtain consistent genotypic differences in<br />
the germplasm improvement trials for submergence toler<strong>an</strong>ce, much<br />
more attention should be paid to the floodwater characteristics. Field<br />
<strong>research</strong> data on submergence are not interpretable <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong> experiment<br />
may not be repeatable because of insufficient biophysical information<br />
about the environmental conditions of floodwater. Levitt (1980) cited<br />
several mech<strong>an</strong>isms import<strong>an</strong>t in flooding of soils (referred to as<br />
waterlogging), but did not include the additional effects associated with<br />
partial <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> complete submergence. There are several factors involved<br />
with the adverse effects of flooding in rice. Some of these factors may<br />
combine, e.g., siltation of leaves may affect other factors such as<br />
mech<strong>an</strong>ical damage, light, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> gas diffusion. Limited gas diffusion is the<br />
most import<strong>an</strong>t factor during flooding (Setter et ah, 1995). Gas diffusion<br />
is 10^-fold slower in solution th<strong>an</strong> in air (Armstrong, 1979). Any gas<br />
produced under the water during flooding (e.g. O2 during the day, CO2<br />
at night, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ethylene) increases its concentration at the production site<br />
whereas <strong>an</strong>y gas consumed (e.g. O2 at night <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CO2 during the day)<br />
decreases its concentration at the consumption site due to the slow gas<br />
diffusion in water. This is supported by several data on gas<br />
concentrations obtained in rice field floodwater (Setter et ah, 1988a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Setter e.t ah, 1988b). A limited CO2 supply is common in flood-prone<br />
environments.<br />
The CO2 concentration in floodwater during turbulent flash floods<br />
tends to be in equilibrium with that in air due to rapid mixing (Setter et<br />
ah, 1987) but once the water level stabilizes, floodwater may become<br />
stagn<strong>an</strong>t, resulting in low CO2 concentration due to large iDoundary<br />
layer effects (Smith <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Walker, 1980; as discussed by Setter et ah, 1989).<br />
Some areas in Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> have floodwater with relatively high pH, which<br />
rises above 7.0 during the day presumably due to CO2 consumption<br />
through photosynthesis (Setter et ah, 1987). Coupled with little<br />
turbulence in the floodwater <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the resist<strong>an</strong>ce of the boundary layer<br />
facing the gas envelope around the leaves would lead to low CO2 , high<br />
O2 , <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> high pH in the boundary layer (Setter et ah, 1989).
Osamu ItO/ Gloria Cabuslay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ev<strong>an</strong>gelina Ella 85<br />
In some environments^ O 2 is completely absent (<strong>an</strong>oxia) in the<br />
fioodwater particularly during the night when the O2 produced in the<br />
daytime has been consumed for respiration. Burg <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Thim<strong>an</strong>n (1959)<br />
reported that <strong>an</strong> ethylene precursor accumulated during <strong>an</strong>oxia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that<br />
in waterlogged tomato pl<strong>an</strong>ts it was tr<strong>an</strong>sported from <strong>an</strong>oxic roots to<br />
the shoots via root-shoot vasculature (Jackson <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Campbelb 1975a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
1976). When the precursor reached the aerated shoots^ a large Amount of<br />
ethylene Qackson <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Campbell 1975a, 1975b <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 1976) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> faster rate<br />
of ethylene production were observed (Bradford <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Dilley^ 1978;<br />
Jackson, 1979; Jackson et al,, 1978) after 24-72 h waterlogging, especially<br />
at warmer temperatures (Burg <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Thim<strong>an</strong>n, 1959; Jackson, 1985).<br />
However, in submerged photosynthetic tissues, the O2 deficiency may<br />
not occur due to O2 evolution via photosynthesis during the day when<br />
the fioodwater becomes supersaturated with O2 (Heckm<strong>an</strong> 1979; Setter<br />
et at, 1987 for Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>; Whitton et al., 1988 for B<strong>an</strong>gladesh; Sinhababu et<br />
a l, 1991; Setter et at, 1995 for India). In principle, this high O 2<br />
concentration during the day may be injurious due to elevated<br />
photorespiration or oxidative damage associated with post<strong>an</strong>oxic injury,<br />
i.e., reentry of air following exposure to <strong>an</strong>oxia.<br />
Another import<strong>an</strong>t limitation to photosynthesis under water is some<br />
flash-flood affected areas is low irracli<strong>an</strong>ce due to turbidity. There was a<br />
reduction to < 1% irradi<strong>an</strong>ce in air at only 40 cm depth in one floodaffected<br />
location in eastern India (Setter et at, 1995). Whitton et al. (1998)<br />
made the same observation in fioodwater in B<strong>an</strong>gladesh due to surface<br />
algal floes.<br />
V. EFFECT OF SUBMERGENCE STRESS ON PLANT GROWTH<br />
A. Morphology<br />
1. A e r e n c h y m a f o r m a t io n<br />
An internal, longitudinally connected gas-filled intercellular space<br />
formed by cell separation or by breakdown of cortical cells or pericycle<br />
(aerenchyma) promotes root growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> survival in oxygen-deficient<br />
conditions (Ap Rees <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Wilson, 1984; Armstrong, 1979).<br />
Such gas-filled ch<strong>an</strong>nels would allow rapid gas movement from<br />
shoot to root apex to supply O2 for root respiration <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to release O2 into<br />
the rhizosphere for oxygenation. Oxygenation is of import<strong>an</strong>ce because<br />
it helps detoxify chemically reduced iron, m<strong>an</strong>g<strong>an</strong>ese, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hydrogen<br />
sulfide (Gambrell et al, 1991) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> may support nitrifying bacteria in the<br />
conversion of ammonia to nitrate (Blom et al, 1994). Aerenchyma not<br />
only promotes long-dist<strong>an</strong>ce oxygen tr<strong>an</strong>sport to the roots, but also
86 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
facilitates the connterflow of volatile compounds that accumulate in the<br />
<strong>an</strong>aerobic soil <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>t tissues which include eth<strong>an</strong>ol (Crawford <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Fineg<strong>an</strong>, 1989)^ CO2 , <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> meth<strong>an</strong>e (Vartapeti<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jacksort; 1997).<br />
High porosity in primary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> adventitious roots is achieved by the<br />
formation of aerenchyma^ although cubic as opposed to hexagonal<br />
packing also increases porosity (Yamasaki, 1952; Justin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Armstrong,<br />
1987). Aerenchyma is formed either by selective cell lysis commonly<br />
found in deeper rooted wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> species (Justin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Armstrong, 1987) or<br />
by cell separation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> differential rates of exp<strong>an</strong>sion, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> both<br />
developed constitutively in most but not all the wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> amphibious<br />
species examined (Smirnoff <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Crawford, 1983), The proportion of<br />
root occupied by aerenchyma in some wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> amphibious species<br />
such as Rumex crispus (La<strong>an</strong> et ah, 1989), rice (Justin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Armstrong,<br />
1987), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> willow Qackson <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Attwood, 1996) is further promoted by<br />
poor aeration. The formation of aerenchyma is the most import<strong>an</strong>t<br />
adaptive feature in facilitating O2 movement down into the roots. The<br />
movement of O2 through the aerenchyma is usually by diffusion though<br />
other mech<strong>an</strong>isms may occur as described by Armstrong et ah (1996). A<br />
comprehensive study of the types of aerenchyma in wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>ts<br />
(including rice) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nonwetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>ts has been done by Justin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Armstrong (1987).<br />
The size of aerenchyma in a root depends on several factors <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
their interactions. Aerenchyma is present in m<strong>an</strong>y roots of rice<br />
genotypes regardless of the environmental factors (Luxmoore <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Stolzy, 1969) but its volume varies with the genotypes (Barber et ah,<br />
1962; Justin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Armstrong, 1991). Aerenchyma formation in roots of<br />
other cereals, however, is very slow in well-aerated conditions but<br />
greatly enh<strong>an</strong>ced during waterlogging, e.g., in stagn<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> partial<br />
shortage of oxygen or in <strong>an</strong>oxic solutions (for corn <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> wheat, Yu et ah,<br />
1969; Varade et ah, 1970; Drew et ah, 1979). This response is more<br />
evident in lines with higher waterlogging toler<strong>an</strong>ce (Hu<strong>an</strong>g et ah, 1994;<br />
Hu<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Johnson, 1995). In corn it was shown that such response is<br />
mediated by ethylene (Drew et ah, 1979) which forms in signific<strong>an</strong>tly<br />
increasing amounts when the oxygen level is about 2 0 % of air saturation<br />
(Brailsford et ah, 1993). Low O2 stimulates ethylene synthesis in the roots<br />
(Jackson, 1985; Atwell et ah, 1988). Stagn<strong>an</strong>t conditions lead to the<br />
entrapment of ethylene produced in the pl<strong>an</strong>t tissues (Jackson, 1985).<br />
Ethylene action induces programed cell death in cortical cells of primary<br />
roots in association with a disorientation of microtubules in cells<br />
destined to collapse (Baluska et ah, 1993), degradation of the cell wall<br />
(Webb <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jackson, 1986), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong> increase in cellulase activity (Jackson<br />
et ah, 1993; He et ah, 1994).
Osamu Ito, Gloria Cabuslay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ev<strong>an</strong>gelina Ella 87<br />
The age of the root affects aerenchyma formation. An earlier view<br />
was that in cereals such as com <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> wheat/ aerenchyma would be<br />
formed in nodal but not seminal roots. Konings (1982) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Thomson et<br />
al. (1990) showed that the seminal roots of corn <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> wheat also form<br />
aerenchyma, provided the roots are exposed to stagn<strong>an</strong>t conditions or<br />
ethylene when they are still shorter th<strong>an</strong> 1 0 - 2 0 cm. In wheat, nodal roots<br />
longer th<strong>an</strong> 1 0 cm do not develop a large volume of aerenchyma even<br />
when exposed to conditions which induce aerenchyma formation<br />
(Thomson et al,, 1990).<br />
The formation of aerenchyma during flooding is not only confined<br />
to the roots but is also seen in the leaves (Jackson, 1989, Grinieva <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Bragina, 1993 as cited by Vartapeti<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jackson, 1997) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thus<br />
presumably interconnects with the root aerenchyma to form a<br />
continuum (Vartapeti<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jackson, 1997).<br />
2. S t e m e l o n g a t io n<br />
Adaptation to submergence is a complex process involving a number of<br />
traits. The suitable combination of these traits varies depending on the<br />
type of submergence, i.e., flash flood or stagn<strong>an</strong>t, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is generally<br />
observed not only in rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> similar monocots, but also in some dicots,<br />
e.g. the genus Rumex, a native of the floodplains of Europe<strong>an</strong> rivers (as<br />
reviewed by Blom et al,, 1990; Voesenek et al., 1992; La<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Blpm,<br />
1990). Like rice, Rumex consists of a r<strong>an</strong>ge of genotypes with varying<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> adaptation to submergence. Among these are Rumex<br />
acetosa, intoler<strong>an</strong>t to submergence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ethylenednsensitive so that<br />
elongation of the petioles does not occur either during submergence or<br />
exposure to ethylene, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> growing on the high ground of river b<strong>an</strong>ks;<br />
Rumex crispus, toler<strong>an</strong>t to complete submergence even in darkness with<br />
relatively little elongation during submergence, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> adapted in areas of<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sient submergence; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rumex maritimus, less toler<strong>an</strong>t to prolonged<br />
complete submergence in darkness th<strong>an</strong> Rumex crispus, with rapid<br />
elongation of petioles during submergence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> exposure to ethylene,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> like deepwater rice adapted in areas prone to prolonged<br />
submergence. Elongation growth may compete with mainten<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
processes for energy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> could thereby reduce survival during<br />
submergence. This correlative response between intoler<strong>an</strong>ce to complete<br />
submergence in darkness <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subst<strong>an</strong>tial ability to elongate was further<br />
explored by Setter <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Laureles (1996) who demonstrated with five rice<br />
genotypes that there is a good negative correlation (r = - 0.81) between<br />
survival <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> elongation growth during complete submergence. Increase<br />
in survival with the addition of a gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitor is<br />
most likely related to reduced elongation growth since (i) addition of<br />
gibberellin had the opposite effect by reducing survival <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> (ii)<br />
gibberellin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its biosynthesis inhibitor together had no effect on
88 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
elongation growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> survival. Moreover, a gibberellin-deficient<br />
mut<strong>an</strong>t of rice with equal initial dry weights <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> carbohydrate levels<br />
relative to a submergence-toler<strong>an</strong>t cultivar exhibited little elongation<br />
during submergence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> showed a high level of submergence toler<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />
This finding suggests that by selecting for less elongating genotypes,<br />
there could be a potential to increase submergence toler<strong>an</strong>ce in periods<br />
of complete submergence when the elongation ability is not required.<br />
Elongation under flash-flood conditions would constitute a<br />
disadv<strong>an</strong>tage because the taller pl<strong>an</strong>ts would tend to lodge once the<br />
water level recedes.<br />
Mainly characteristics of the shoot contribute to obtention of oxygen<br />
when the usual oxygen supply route is severed by flooding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stem<br />
elongation would be a major feature, ensuring rise of leaves above the<br />
water level <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hence the ability to photosynthesize. Rapid emergence<br />
into the aerial environment by young stems or petioles originating from<br />
the seed or perennating org<strong>an</strong>s rooted in the substratum presumably<br />
benefit the pl<strong>an</strong>t by allowing undisturbed photosynthesis, aerobic<br />
respiration, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pollination. Avoid<strong>an</strong>ce of submergence through stem<br />
elongation is typical of deepwater rice, a remarkable ecotype which c<strong>an</strong><br />
elongate its stem by up to 25 cm a day to reach 5 m or more in length <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
yield grains despite several months of deepwater stress (Vergara et al.,<br />
1976). Leaf <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> internode elongation is appropriate to the deep water<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> floating rice areas where water level remains > 1 0 0 cm high for<br />
several months, nonetheless pl<strong>an</strong>ts may completely submerged for short<br />
period if flooding is severe.<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>ts partially submerged <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> having the ability to elongate rapidly<br />
increase their endogeneous ethylene content by 2 to 3 times (Metraux<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kende, 1983). The import<strong>an</strong>ce of ethylene in underwater growth<br />
Was revealed by slow growth in the presence of <strong>an</strong> inhibitor of <strong>an</strong><br />
ethylene precursor <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reversal of the effect when the ethylene precursor<br />
was added.<br />
3. N o d a l r o o t f o r m a t io n<br />
A swelling at the base of the stem, called hypertrophy, quickly develops<br />
when this region is submerged during flooding, as reported in tomato,<br />
sunflower, corn, various woody species (Kramer, 1951; Phillips, 1964;<br />
Kutnetsova et al., 1981; Hook, 1984 respectively, as cited in Jackson,<br />
1985) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> floating rice (Suge, 1985). This is the result of <strong>an</strong> accelerated<br />
lateral cell exp<strong>an</strong>sion <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> c<strong>an</strong> be associated with increased intercellular<br />
space, cell lysis to form <strong>an</strong> aerenchyma, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subsequent adventitious<br />
rooting. There is subst<strong>an</strong>tial evidence (Kawase, 1974; Wample <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ried,<br />
1979) that hypertrophy in sunflower hypocotyls waterlogged over 1-3
Osamu Ito, Gloria Cabuslay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ev<strong>an</strong>gelina Ella 89<br />
days is associated with enh<strong>an</strong>ced ethylene concentration in the swelling<br />
tissue <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> increased cellulase activity that may soften cell walls, thirdly<br />
favoring exp<strong>an</strong>sion (Kawase 1979). The same response was induced<br />
when a water jacket was applied only to the base of hypocotyls (Kawase,<br />
1979) or the roots were submerged with hypocotyls in aerated water<br />
(Wample <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reid, 1975, 1978). Hypertrophy was also observed after<br />
applying ethephon, a subst<strong>an</strong>ce that breaks down to form ethylene in the<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t tissue (Kawase, 1974) or 0.1 Pa ethylene (Kawase, .1981). These<br />
findings suggest that submergence alone is sufficient, <strong>an</strong>oxic roots are<br />
not required to induce hypertrophy, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the entrapped ethylene is likely<br />
to be the cause even though Kawase (1981) failed to show evidence that<br />
silver ions inhibited cellulase activity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hypertrophy in submerged<br />
hypocotyls.<br />
B. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Metabolism<br />
The effect of limited gas diffusion during submergence is demonstrated<br />
by the observation that when a rice pl<strong>an</strong>t is flushed with air of high CO2<br />
partial pressure (1-2 kPa) while being submerged, it survives for up to a<br />
3-month complete submergence in contrast to 0.03 kPa in which the rice<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t dies within 1-2 weeks (Setter et al., 1989). The beneficial effects of<br />
high C0 2 -flushing treatments are rather complex because such<br />
treatments would result not only in <strong>an</strong> increase in CO2 supply, but also<br />
in O2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> possibly in decreased concentrations or effects of ethylene ini<br />
floodwater (Setter et al, 1997).<br />
The effects on growth due to O2 deficiency are described by Drew<br />
(1983), Jackson <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Drew (1984), Drew (1990), Setter <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ella (1994),<br />
Setter et al (1994), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Setter et al (1997). Anoxia for 24 h resulted in<br />
death of m<strong>an</strong>y pl<strong>an</strong>ts including <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>oxia-intoler<strong>an</strong>t rice cultivar IRS<br />
(Crawford 1989) because the absence of oxygen may stop respiration<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reduce energy production for survival <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> elongation growth. It<br />
inhibits oxidative phosphorylation reducing the rates of ATP synthesis<br />
by 12- to 18-fold unless there are metabolic adaptations.<br />
The energy shortage caused by <strong>an</strong>oxia may lead to reduced nutrient<br />
uptake, cessation of root elongation in submerged pl<strong>an</strong>ts, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> eventually<br />
pronounced root injury <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> death of the tips <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the whole root systems<br />
(Waters et al, 1989). Such effects on the root function <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> growth would<br />
cause reductions in shoot growth due to nutrient deficiencies (Drew,<br />
1983) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> feedback control on the rate of shoot growth to limit excessive<br />
increase in shoot-to-root ratio which might be mediated by pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
hormones such as ethylene Qackson <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Drew, 1984).<br />
Carbon assimilation during submergence is affected by several<br />
factors including CO2 supply, irradi<strong>an</strong>ce, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the capacity of the pl<strong>an</strong>t to
90 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
photosynthesize under floodwater. The last factor may be mediated by<br />
ethylene effects on chlorophyll Qackson et al.^ 1987). Carbohydrate is <strong>an</strong><br />
import<strong>an</strong>t factor in conferring submergence toler<strong>an</strong>ce in rice (Setter et<br />
al.f 1997). Several <strong>research</strong>es support this conclusion based on<br />
observations in (i) dark <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> shade treatments before <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> during<br />
submergence (Palada <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vergara^ 1972); (ii) CO2 supply <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hence<br />
floodwater pH which affects the ratio of carbon dioxide to bicarbonate<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>t photosynthesis under water (Setter et at, 1989); (iii) seed size<br />
(Ella <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Setter, 1996; IRRI, 1996); <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> (iv) seedling age (Reddy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Mittra, 1985; Chaturvedi et at, 1995; Mallik et at, 1995). There was a<br />
strong correlation between stem carbohydrate prior to submergence<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> toler<strong>an</strong>ce to 12-d submergence (r^ = 0.90,30-d-old rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts; Mallik<br />
et at, 1995).<br />
VI. CONCLUDING REMARKS<br />
Although productivity is low, there is <strong>an</strong> increasing tendency for farmers<br />
to use rainfed areas for rice cultivation. This is because of rapid<br />
conversion of prime agricultural l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s to housing <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> industrial uses,<br />
because l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>owners receive greater returns on their investments.<br />
Scientists, should therefore, work harder in developing cultivars<br />
adapted to drought/submergence-prone areas to meet the dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> of<br />
subsistence farmers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the ever-increasing world population,<br />
especially in developing countries.<br />
Despite concerted scientific efforts, development of high-yielding<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> drought submergence-toler<strong>an</strong>t rice cultivars remains elusive. This<br />
demonstrates the complexity of rainfed ecosystems, worsened by<br />
unpredictable moisture supply. A deeper underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing of the<br />
mech<strong>an</strong>isms of drought/submergence toler<strong>an</strong>ces in rice is necessary for<br />
breeders to be able to identify heritable traits that will make pl<strong>an</strong>ts<br />
adaptable to harsh conditions in rainfed areas.<br />
Ap Reses, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Wilson, P.M. 1984. Effects of reduced supply of oxygen on the metabolism<br />
to roots of Glyceria maxima <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pisum saiivum. Z. Pfl<strong>an</strong>zenphysiot 114:493-503.<br />
Armstrong, W. 1979. Aeration in higher pl<strong>an</strong>ts. In: Adv<strong>an</strong>ces in Bot<strong>an</strong>ical [^search. H.W.W.<br />
Woolhouse, (ed.). Acad. Press, London, pp. 225-332.<br />
Armstrong, W., Armstrong, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Becket, P.M. 1996. Pressurised aeration in wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
macrophytes: some theoretical aspects of humidity-induced convection <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thermal<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>spiration. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 31:25-36.<br />
Atkin, O.K., Villar, R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Lambers, H. 1995. Partitioning of electrons between the<br />
cytochrome <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> alternative pathways in intact roots. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Physio/. 108:1179-1183.
Osamu Ito, Gloria Cabuslay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ev<strong>an</strong>gelina Ella 91<br />
Atwell, B.J., Drew, M,C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jackson, M.B. 1988. The influence of oxygen deficiency on<br />
ethylene synthesis, l-aminocycloprop<strong>an</strong>e-l-carboxylic acid levels, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> aerenchyma<br />
formation in roots of Zea mays. Physiologia Pl<strong>an</strong>tamm 72; 15-22.<br />
Bahr, J.T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bonner, W.D. 1973. Cy<strong>an</strong>ide-insensitive respiration, II. Control of the<br />
alternative pathway. /. Boi7. Chem. 218:3446-^450.<br />
Baluska, F., Brailsford, R.W., Hauskrecht, M., Jackson, M.B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Barlow, P.W. 1993.<br />
Differential morphogenesis in the maize root cortex: involvement of microtubules <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
phytohormones during post-mitotic cell growth in relation to aerenchyma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other<br />
responses to environmental stresses. Botánica Acta 106:394-404.<br />
Barber, D.A., Ebert, M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ev<strong>an</strong>s, N.T.S. 1962. The movement of through barley <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts. J. Exp. Bot. 13: 397-403.<br />
Begg, J.E, 1980. Morphological adaptations of leaves to water stress. In: Adaptation of Pl<strong>an</strong>ts to<br />
Water <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> High Temperature Stress. N.C. Turner <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P.J. Kramer (eds.), Wiley-Interscience,<br />
New York, N. Y„ pp. 33-42.<br />
Boyer, J.S. 1996. Adv<strong>an</strong>ces in drought toler<strong>an</strong>ce in pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Adv. Agron. 56:187-218.<br />
Biom, C.W.P.M., Eogem<strong>an</strong>n, G.M., harm, P., v<strong>an</strong> der Sm<strong>an</strong>, A.J.M., v<strong>an</strong> de Steeg, H.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Voesenek L.A.C.J. 1990. Adaptations to flooding in pl<strong>an</strong>ts from river areas. Aquatic<br />
Bot<strong>an</strong>y 38: 29-47.<br />
Blom, C.W.P.M., Voesenek, LA.C.J., B<strong>an</strong>ga, M., Engelaar, W.M.H.G., Rijnders,J.H.G.M., V<strong>an</strong><br />
Steeg H.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Visser E.J.W. 1994, Physiological ecology of riverside species: Adaptive<br />
responses of pl<strong>an</strong>ts to submergence. Ann. Bot<strong>an</strong>y 74:253-263.<br />
Boyer, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> McPherson, H.G. 1976. Physiology of water deficits in cereal grains. Proc.<br />
Symp. Climate <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong>, IRRI, Los B<strong>an</strong>os, Laguna, Philippines, pp. 321-339.<br />
Bradford, K.J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Dilley, D.R. 1978. Effects of root <strong>an</strong>aerobiosis on ethylene production,<br />
epinasty, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> growth of tomato pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Physiol. 61:506-509.<br />
Brailsford, R.W., Voesenek, L.A.C.J., Blom, C.W.P.M., Smith, A.R., Hall, M.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jackson,<br />
M.B. 1993. Enh<strong>an</strong>ced ethylene production by primary roots of Ze
92 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Dingkuhn, M,, De Datta^ S.K., Dorffling, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Javell<strong>an</strong>a, C. 1989. Varietal differences in leaf<br />
water potential^ leaf net CO2 assimilation, conductivity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> water use efficiency in<br />
upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice. Aust, J. Agrie. Res. 40; 1183-1192.<br />
Dingkuhn, M., Farquhar, G.D., De Datta, S.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O'Toole, J.C. 1991. Discrimination of<br />
among upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rices having different water use efficiencies. Aust. }. Agrie Res. 42:1123-<br />
1131.<br />
Dingkuhn, M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kropff, M. 1996. Growth <strong>an</strong>alysis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> photoassimilate partitioning. In:<br />
Photoassimilate D/stríÍJwfi'o« in Pl<strong>an</strong>ts <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Crops. Source-Sink Relationship. E. Zamski <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> A.<br />
Schaffer, (eds.). MarceJ Dekker, New York, pp. 519-547.<br />
Drew, M.C. 1983. Pl<strong>an</strong>t injury <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> adaptation to oxygen in the root environment; a review.<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Soil 75:179-199.<br />
Drew, M.C. 1990. Sensing soil oxygen. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Cell Environ. 13: 681-693.<br />
Drew, M.C., Jackson, M.B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Giffard, S. 1979. Ethylene-promoted adventitious rooting <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
development of cortical air spaces (aerenchyma) in roots may be adaptive responses to<br />
flooding in Zea mays L. Pl<strong>an</strong>ta 147: 83-88.<br />
Dry, I.B., Moore, A.L., Day, D.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Wiskich, J.T. 1989. Regulation of alternative pathway<br />
activity in pl<strong>an</strong>t mitochondria. Non-linear relationship between electron flux <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
redox poise of the quinone pool. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 273; 148-157.<br />
Eghball, B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mar<strong>an</strong>ville, J.W. 1993. Root development <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>' nitrogen influx of corn<br />
genotypes grown under combined drought <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nitrogen stresses. Agron. J. 85; 147-152.<br />
Ella, E.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Setter, T.L. 1996. Import<strong>an</strong>ce of carbohydrates in rice {Oryza sativa L.) seeds<br />
exposed to <strong>an</strong>oxia. Proc. 12th Ann. Sei. Conf. Fed. Crop Sei. Soci. Philippines, Davao City,<br />
Philippines, 21 suppl. 1: 75.<br />
Farquhar, G.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Richards, R.A. 1984. Isotopic composition of pl<strong>an</strong>t carbon correlates<br />
with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Aust f. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Physiol. 11:539-552.<br />
Fukai, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cooper, M. 1995. Development of drought-resist<strong>an</strong>t cultivars using<br />
physiomorphological traits in rice. Field Crops Res. 40: 67-^6.<br />
Gambrell, R.P., Delaune, R.D., <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Patrick, W.H. Jr. 1991. Redox processes in soils following<br />
oxygen depletion. In: Pl<strong>an</strong>t Life Under oxygen deprivation. Ecology, physiology, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
biochemistry. M.B. Jackson, D.p, Davies <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> H. Lumbers (eds). The Hague. SPB Academic,<br />
pp. 101-117.<br />
Grinieva, G.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bragina, T.V. 1993. Structural <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> functional patterns of maize<br />
adaptation to flooding, Russi<strong>an</strong> Pl<strong>an</strong>t Physiol. 40:662-667.<br />
H<strong>an</strong>son, A.D., Peacock W.J., Ev<strong>an</strong>s L.T., Amtzen C.J., <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1995. Drought<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice. Nature 234; 2, In: Development of drought-resist<strong>an</strong>t cultivars using<br />
physio-morphological traits in rice. Fukai, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cooper M., (ed.). Field Crops Res. 40;<br />
67-86.<br />
He, C.J., Drew, M.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Morg<strong>an</strong>, P.W. 1994. Induction of enzymes associated with<br />
lysigenous aerenchyma formation in roots of Zea mays during hypoxia or nitrogen<br />
starvation. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Physiol, 105; 861-865,<br />
He, J.X., W<strong>an</strong>g, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Li<strong>an</strong>g, H.G. 1995. Effects of water stress on photochemical function <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
protein metabolism of photosystem II in wheat leaves. Physiol. Pl<strong>an</strong>t. 93: 771-777.<br />
Heckm<strong>an</strong>, C.W. 1979. <strong>Rice</strong>field ecology in Northeastern Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>: the Effect of Wef <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Dry<br />
Seasons on a Cultivated Aquatic Ecosystem. Dr. W. Junk (ed.) Publishers, London.<br />
Flu<strong>an</strong>g, B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Johnson, J.W. 1995. Root respiration <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> carbohydrate status of two wheat<br />
genotypes in response to hypoxia. Ann. Bot<strong>an</strong>y 75:427-432,<br />
Hu<strong>an</strong>g, B., Johnson, J.W., Nesmith, S, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bridges, D.C. 1994, Growth, physiological, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
<strong>an</strong>atomical responses of two wheat genotypes to waterlogging <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nutrient supply. J.<br />
Exp. Bot 45; 193-202.<br />
International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (IRRI) 1990. Program Report for 1989. Los Baños,<br />
Laguna, Philippines, p. 94.
Osamu lio, Gloria Cabuslay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ev<strong>an</strong>gelina Ella 93<br />
IRRI. 1996. Program Report for 1995. Los B<strong>an</strong>so, Laguna, Philippines, pp. 88,92.<br />
Ito, O., Katayama, K., Adu-Gyamfi, J.J., Devi, G. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rao, T.P. 1996. Root activities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
function in component crops for intercropping. In: Roots <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nitrogen in Cropping Systems<br />
of the Semi-Arid Tropics. O. Ito, C. Joh<strong>an</strong>sen, J.J. Adu-Gyamfi, K. Katayama, J.V.D.K.<br />
Kumar Rao <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T.J. Rego, (eds.). Proc. Inti. Workshop Dynamics of Root <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nitrogen in<br />
Cropping Systems of the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) at Pat<strong>an</strong>cheru, India, 21-25<br />
November 1994, pp. 149-172.<br />
Jackson, M.B. 1979. Is the diageotropic tomato ethylene-deficient? Pftysioi. Pl<strong>an</strong>t 46:347-351.<br />
Jackson, M.B. 1985. Ethylene <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> responses of pl<strong>an</strong>ts to soil waterlogging <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> submergence.<br />
Ann. Rev. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Physiol. 36:145-174.<br />
Jackson, M.B. 1989. Regulation of aerenchyma formation in roots <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> shoots by oxygen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
ethylene. In: Cell Separation in Pl<strong>an</strong>ts: Physiology, Biochemistry, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Molecular Biology. D.J.<br />
Osborne <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> M.B. Jackson, (eds,). Springer Berlin, pp. 263-274.<br />
Jackson, M.B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Attwood, P. 1996. Roots of willow {Salix viminalis L.) show marked<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce to oxygen shortage in flooded soils <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> solution culture. P/
94 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
La<strong>an</strong>, P., Berrevoets M.J., Lythe S., Armstrong, W., <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Blom, CWPM. 1989. Root morphology<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> aerenchyma formation as indicators for the flood-toler<strong>an</strong>ce of Rumex species. J, Eco/.<br />
77; 693-703.<br />
Lambers, H., v<strong>an</strong> der Wèrf, A, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Konings, H. 1991. Respiratory patterns in roots in relation<br />
to their functioning. In; Pl<strong>an</strong>t Roots: The Hidden Half. Waisel, Eshel <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kafkafi, (eds.), pp.<br />
229-263.<br />
Laude, H.M. 1971. Drought influence on physiological processes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subsequent growth. In:<br />
Drought Injury <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Crops. Proc. Symp. Ann. Meeting Crop Sei. Soci. Amer,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Amer. Seo. Agron., Tucson, Arizona, August 24,1970.<br />
Lawlor, D.W. 1995. The effects of water deficit on photosynthesis. In; Environment <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
meíflí?o//sm. F/ej:ií)27ifi/ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Acclimation. N. Smirnoff, (ed.) BIOS Sei. Publ. UK,pp. 129-160.<br />
Levitt, J. 1980, Responses of Pl<strong>an</strong>ts to Environmental Stresses, Vol. II. Water, Radiation, Salt, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Other Stresses. Acad. Press, NY.<br />
Lilley, J.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fukai, S. 1994 a. Effect of timing <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> severity of water deficit on four diverse<br />
rice cultivars, I. Rooting pattern <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soil water extraction. Field Crops Res. 37(3): 205-213.<br />
Lilley, Ï.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fukai, S. 1994b. Effect of timing <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> severity of water deficit on four diverse<br />
rice cultivars, III. Phenological development, crop growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grain yield. Field Crops<br />
Res. 37; 225-234.<br />
Luxmoore, R.Ï. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Stolzy, L.H. 1969. Root porosity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> growth response of rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> maize<br />
to oxygen supply. Agron. J. 61:202-204.<br />
Ma, y.F. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Lu, D.Z. 1990. Effect of irrigation methods on senescence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> physiological<br />
activities in hybrid rice after heading. Chinese /. <strong>Rice</strong> Sei, 4; 56-62.<br />
Mackill, D.J., Colim<strong>an</strong>, W.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Garrity, D.P. 1996. Rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice improvement.<br />
ÏRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines.<br />
Mallik, S., Kundu, C., B<strong>an</strong>eiji, C., Nayak, D.K., Chaterjee, S.D., <strong>N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a</strong>, P.K., Ingram, K.T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Setter, T.L., 1995. <strong>Rice</strong> germplasm evaluation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> improvement for stagn<strong>an</strong>t flooding. In:<br />
Rainfed Lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong>-Agricultural Research for High Risk Environment. K.T. Ingram, (ed.)<br />
IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, pp, 97-109.<br />
Metraux, J.P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kende, H. 1983. The role of ethylene in the growth response of submerged<br />
deep water rice. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Physiol. 72: 441-446.<br />
Millar, A.H., Atkin, O.K., Lambers, H., Wiskich, J.T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Day, D. A. 1995. A critique of the use<br />
of inhibitors to estimate partitioning of electrons between mitochondrial respiratory<br />
pathways in pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Physiol, Pl<strong>an</strong>t. 95:523-532.<br />
Moreshet, S., Bridges, D.C., NeSmith, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hu<strong>an</strong>g, B. 1996. Effects of water deficit stress<br />
on competitive interaction of pe<strong>an</strong>ut <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sicklepod. Agron. J. 8 8 ; 636-651.<br />
Morg<strong>an</strong>, J.M. 1984. Osmoregulation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> water stress in higher pl<strong>an</strong>ts. A««. Reí?. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Physiol.<br />
35: 299-319.<br />
Morita, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Abe, J. 1996. Development of root systems in wheat <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice. In: Roofs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Nitrogen in Cropping Systems of the Semi-Arid Tropics. O. Ito, C. Joh<strong>an</strong>sen, J.J. Adu-Gyamfi,<br />
K, Katayama, J.V.D.K. Kumar Rao <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T.J. Rego, (eds.). Proc. Inti. Workshop Dynamics<br />
of Root <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nitrogen in Cropping Systems of the Semi-Arid tropics (ICRISAT) at<br />
Pat<strong>an</strong>cheru, India, 21-25 November 1994. pp. 185-198,<br />
Nicolas, M.,Lambers, E.H., Simpson, R.J., <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Dalling, Wf.J. 1985. Effect of drought on<br />
metabolism <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> partitioning of carbon in two varieties of wheat differing in drought<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce, Ann, Bot. 55: 727-742,<br />
O'Toole, J.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g, T.T. 1978. Drought <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice improvement in perspective, IRRI<br />
Research Paper Series (14): 1-27.<br />
Palada, M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vergara, B.S. 1972. Environmental effect on the resist<strong>an</strong>ce of rice seedlings to<br />
complete submergence. Crop Sei. 12:209-212.
Osamu ItO/ Gloria Cabuslay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ev<strong>an</strong>gelina Ella 95<br />
Pardales, J.R. Jr. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kono, Y. 1990. Development of sorghum root system under increasing<br />
drought stress, fap. f. Crop Sci. 59(4): 752-761.<br />
Poorter, H., v<strong>an</strong> der Werf, A., Atkin, O.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Lambers, H. 1991. Respiratory energy<br />
requirements of roots vary with the potential growth rate of a pl<strong>an</strong>t species. Physiol.<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>t. 83:469-475.<br />
Ram, P.C., Singh, B.B., Singh, A.K., Singh, V.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh, V.P. 1996. Environmental <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t measurement requirements for the assessment of drought, flooding, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> salinity<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce in rice. In: Proc. Inti. Conf, Stress Physiology of <strong>Rice</strong>, 28 Feb.-5 Mar. 1994,<br />
Lucknow, India, pp. 44-69.<br />
Reddy, M,D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mittra, B.N. 1985. Effects of complete pl<strong>an</strong>t submergence on vegetative<br />
growth, grain yield, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> some biochemical ch<strong>an</strong>ges in rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Soil 87:365-<br />
374,<br />
Saini, H.S. 1997. Effects of water stress on male gametophyte development in pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Sex<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>t Reprod. 10: 67-73.<br />
Samson, B.K., Wade, L.J., Sarkarung, S., Has<strong>an</strong>, M. Amin, R., Hampichitvitya, D., P<strong>an</strong>tuw<strong>an</strong>,<br />
G., Rodriguez, R., Sigari, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Calendacion, A, 1995. Examining genotypic variation in<br />
root traits for drought resist<strong>an</strong>ce. In: Fragile Lives in Fragile Ecosystem. Proc. <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Conf., 13-17 February, 1995. IRRI, Los B<strong>an</strong>os, Laguna, Philippines, pp. 521-534.<br />
Sarkarung, S., Singh, O.N., Roy, J.K., V<strong>an</strong>avichit, A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bhekasut, P. 1995. Breeding<br />
strategies for rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ecosystem. In: Fragile Lives in Fragile Ecosystems. Proc. Inti.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Conf. 13-17 February, 1995, IRRI, Los B<strong>an</strong>os, Laguna, Philippines, pp. 709-<br />
720.<br />
Setter, T.L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ella, E.S. 1994. Relationship between coleoplile elongation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> alcoholic<br />
fermentation in rice exposed to <strong>an</strong>oxia, I. Import<strong>an</strong>ce of treatment conditions <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
different tissues. Ann. Bot<strong>an</strong>y 74:265-271.<br />
Setter, T.L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Laureles, E.V. 1996. The beneficial effect of reduced elongation growth on<br />
submergence toler<strong>an</strong>ce in rice. /. Exp. Bot. 47:1551-1559.<br />
Setter, T.L., Ella, E.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Valdez, A.P. 1994, Relationship between coleoptile elongation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
alcoholic fermentation in rice exposed to <strong>an</strong>oxia, II. Cultivar difference Anna. Bot<strong>an</strong>y 74:<br />
273-279.<br />
Setter, T.L., Ellis, M., Laureles,, E.V., Ella, E.S., Senadhira, D., Mishra, S.B., Sarkarung, S, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Datta, S, 1997. Physiology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>genetics</strong> of submergence toler<strong>an</strong>ce in rice. Ann. Bot<strong>an</strong>y 79<br />
(Suppl. A): 67-77.<br />
Setter, T.L, Ingram, K.T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tuong, T.P. 1995. Environmental characterisation requirements<br />
for strategic <strong>research</strong> in rice grown under adverse conditions of drought, flooding, or<br />
salinity. In: Rainfed Lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong>-Agricultural Research for High-Risk Environments, K.T.<br />
Ingram, (ed.), IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, pp. 3-18.<br />
Setter, T.L., Kupk<strong>an</strong>ch<strong>an</strong>akul, T,, Kupk<strong>an</strong>ch<strong>an</strong>akul, K., Bhekasut, P,, Wicngweera, A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Greenway, H. 1987. Concentrations of COj <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O2 in floodwater <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in internodal<br />
lacunae of floating rice growing at 1-2 meter depths. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Cell Environ. 10: 7&7-T/fi.<br />
Setter, T.L,, Kupk<strong>an</strong>ch<strong>an</strong>akul, T., Waters, I. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Greenway, H. 1988a. Evaluation of factors<br />
contributing to diurnal ch<strong>an</strong>ges in floodwater in deep water rice fields. New Phyiologist<br />
110: 151-162.<br />
Setter, T.L., Kupk<strong>an</strong>ch<strong>an</strong>akul, T., Kupk<strong>an</strong>ch<strong>an</strong>akul, K., Bhekasut, P., Wiengweera, A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Greenway, H. 1988b, Environmental factors in deep water rice areas in Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>: O^,<br />
CO2, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ethylene. In: Symp. 1987 Intel. Deepwater <strong>Rice</strong> Workshop. IRRI, Los Baños,<br />
Philippines, pp. 55-66.<br />
Setter, T.L., Waters. L, Wallace, I., Bhekasut, P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Greenway, H. 1989. Submergence of rice,<br />
I. Growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> photosynthetic response to CO2 enrichment of floodwater. Aust. J. Pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
Physiol 16: 251-263,
96 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Shih, S.F., Rahi, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Harrison, D.S., 1982. Evapotr<strong>an</strong>spiration studies on rice in relation<br />
to water use efficiency. Tr<strong>an</strong>s. ASAE 25(3); 702-707.<br />
Singh, A.K., Tuong, T.P., Woperies, M.C.S., Boling, A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kropff, M.J. 1995. Qu<strong>an</strong>tifying<br />
lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice responses to soil-water deficit. In: Fragile Lives in Fragile Ecosystems. Proc.<br />
Intel. <strong>Rice</strong> Research Conf. 13-17 February, 1995, IRRI, Los B<strong>an</strong>os, Laguna, Philippines,<br />
pp. 507-519.<br />
Singh, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ingram, K.T. 1991. Sensitivity of rice to water deficit at different growth stages.<br />
Phil.}, Crop Sei. 16 (SuppL No. 1); S ll.<br />
Sinhababu, D.P., P<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a, M.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rajam<strong>an</strong>i, S., 1991. Compatibility of dhaincha (Sesb<strong>an</strong>ia<br />
aculeata) with rice-fish in rainfed intermediate lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s (0-^0 cm). Onjza^28:497-A99.<br />
Slatyer, R.O. 1973. The effect of internal water status on pl<strong>an</strong>t growth, development <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
yield. In; Pl<strong>an</strong>t Response to Climatic Factors. R.O. Slatyer, (ed.). Proc. Uppsala Symp.<br />
UNESCO, Paris, pp. 177-191.<br />
Smirnoff, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Crawford, R.M.M. 1983. Variation in the structure <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> response to flooding<br />
of root aerenchyma in some wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Ann. Bot<strong>an</strong>y 51:237-249.<br />
Smith, F.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Walker, N.A. 1980. Photosynthesis by aquatic pl<strong>an</strong>ts—^Effects of unstirred<br />
layers in relation to assimilation of CO2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> HCO3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to carbon isotopic<br />
discriminationn. Neio Phytologist 8 6 : 245-259.<br />
Suge, H. 1985. Ethylene <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> gibberellin. Regulation of internodal elongation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nodal root<br />
development in floating rice. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Cell Physiol. 26:607.<br />
Taiz, L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zeiger, E. 1991. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Physiology. Benjamin/Cummings Publ. Co., pp. 346-^56.<br />
Thomson C.J., Armstrong, W., Waters, I., <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Greenway, H. 1990. Aerenchyma formation<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> associated oxygen movement in seminal <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nodal roots of wheat. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Cell Environ.<br />
13: 395-403.<br />
V<strong>an</strong> den Boogaard, R., Kostadinova, S., Veneklaas, E. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Lambers, H. 1995. Association of<br />
water use efficiency <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nitrogen use efficiency with photosynthetic characteristics of<br />
two wheat cultivars. /. Exptl. Bot. 46:1429-1438.<br />
V<strong>an</strong> der Wafer, A. 1996. Growth <strong>an</strong>alysis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> photoassimilate partitioning. In:<br />
Photoassimilate Distribution in Pl<strong>an</strong>ts <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Crops. Source-Sink Relationship. E. Zamski <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> A.<br />
Schaffer (eds.). Marcel Deeker, New York, pp, 1-6.<br />
Varade, S.B., Stolzy, L.H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Letey, J. 1970. Influence of temperature, light intensity, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
aeration on growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> root porosity of wheat (Tritkum aestivum), Agron.}. 62: 79-83.<br />
Vartapeti<strong>an</strong>, B.B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jackson, M.B, 1997. Pl<strong>an</strong>t adaptations to <strong>an</strong>aerobic stress. Ann. Bot<strong>an</strong>y<br />
79 (Suppl. A); 3y20,<br />
Vergara, B.S., Jackson, B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> De Datta, S.K. 1976. Deep water rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its response to deep<br />
water stress. In; Climate <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong>. Intel. <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, IRRI Los Baños<br />
Philippines, pp. 301-319.<br />
Voesenek, L.A.C.J., v<strong>an</strong> der Sm<strong>an</strong>, A.J.M., Harren, F.J.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Blow, C.W.P.M. 1992. An<br />
amalgamation between hormone physiology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>t ecology: a review on flooding<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ethylene. /. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Growfii Regulation 11:171-188.<br />
Wade, L.J., Sarkarung, S., McLaren, C.G., Guhey, A., Quader, B,, Boonwite, C,, Amar<strong>an</strong>te,<br />
S.T., Sarawgi, A.K., Haque, A., Harnpichitvitya, D., Pamplona, A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bhamri, M.C. 1995.<br />
Genotype x environment interaction <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> selection methods for identifying improved<br />
rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice genotypes. In; Fragile Lives in Fragile Ecosystems. Proc. Intel. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research Conf. 13-17 February, 1995, IRRI, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, pp. 885-900.<br />
Wagner, A.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Krab, K. 1995, The alternative respiration pathway in pl<strong>an</strong>ts: Role <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
regulation. Physiol. Pl<strong>an</strong>t. 95:318-325.<br />
Wample, R.L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reid, D.M. 1975, Effect of aeration on the flood-induced formation of<br />
adventitious roots <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other ch<strong>an</strong>ges in sunflower {Heli<strong>an</strong>titus <strong>an</strong>nuus L.). Pl<strong>an</strong>ta 127; ’<br />
263-270.
Osamu Ito, Gloria Cabuslay arvd Ev<strong>an</strong>gelina Ella 97<br />
Wample, R.L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reid, D.M. 1978. Control of adventitious root production <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hypocotylhypertrophy<br />
of sunflower (Heli<strong>an</strong>thus <strong>an</strong>nuus L.) in response to flooding. Physiol. Pl<strong>an</strong>t.<br />
44: 351-358.<br />
Wample^ R,L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reid, D.M. 1979. The role of endogeneous auxins <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ethylene in the<br />
formation of adventitious roots <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hypocotyl hypertrophy in flooded sunflower pl<strong>an</strong>ts<br />
(Heli<strong>an</strong>thus <strong>an</strong>nus L.). Physiol. Pl<strong>an</strong>t. 45:219-226.<br />
Wardlaw, I,F. 1990. The control of carbon partitioning in pl<strong>an</strong>ts. New Phytol. 116: 341-381.<br />
Waters, I., Armstrong, W., Thomson, C.J., Setter, T.L., Adkins, S., Gibbs, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Greenway, H,<br />
1989. Diurnal ch<strong>an</strong>ges in radial oxygen loss <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> eth<strong>an</strong>ol metabolism in roots of<br />
submerged <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> non submerged rice seedlings. New Phytologist 113; 439-451.<br />
Webb, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jackson, M.B. 1986. Tr<strong>an</strong>smission <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cryo-sc<strong>an</strong>ning electron microscopy study<br />
of the formation of aerenchyma (cortical gas-filled space) in adventitious roots of rice<br />
(Oryza sativa L.) /. Exp. Bot^3>7: 832-^41.<br />
Whitton, B.A., Aziz, A., Fr<strong>an</strong>cis, P., Rother, J.A., Simon, J.W. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tahmida, 2.N. 1988.<br />
Ecology of deepwater rice fields in B<strong>an</strong>gladesh, I. Physical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chemical environment.<br />
Hydrobiologia 169; 3-67.<br />
Wonprasaid, S., Khunthasuvon, S., Sittisu<strong>an</strong>g, P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fukai, S. 1996. Perform<strong>an</strong>ce of<br />
contrasting rice cultivars selected for rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> conditions in relation to soil<br />
fertility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> water availability. Field Crops Res. 47:267-275.<br />
Yamauchi, A., Pardales, J.R.Jr., <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kono, Y. 1996, Root system structure <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its relation to<br />
stress toler<strong>an</strong>ce. In: Roofs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nitrogen in Cropping Systems of the Semi-Arid Tropics. O. Ito,<br />
C. Joh<strong>an</strong>sen, J.J. Adu-Gyamfi, K. Katayama, J.V.D.K. Kumar Rao <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T.J. Rego (eds.).<br />
Proc. Inti. Workshop D^am ics of Root <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nitrogen in Cropping Systems of the Semi-<br />
Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) at Pat<strong>an</strong>cheru, India, 21-25 November 1994, pp. 211-233,<br />
Yamasaki, T. 1952. Studies of the 'excess moisture injury' of upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> crops in overmoist soil<br />
from the viewpoint of soil chemistry <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>t physiology. Bull. Nat Inst. Agri. Sei.<br />
(Jap<strong>an</strong>). B. 1:1-92.<br />
Yu, P.T., Stolyz, L.H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Letey, J. 1969. Survival of pl<strong>an</strong>ts xmder prolonged flooded<br />
conditions. Agron. J. 61:844-847,
New Pl<strong>an</strong>t Type of <strong>Rice</strong> for<br />
Increasing the Genetic Yield<br />
Potential<br />
Gurdev S, Khush’^<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Major increases in rice production have occurred during the last 25<br />
years because of large-scale adoption of high-yielding semidwarf<br />
varieties <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> improved m<strong>an</strong>agement practices. World rice production<br />
doubled in a 25-year period/ from 256 Mt in 1966 to 520 Mt in 1990.<br />
During this period/ rice production increased at a slightly higher rate<br />
th<strong>an</strong> the population. However/ the rate of increase of rice production is<br />
now lower (1.5% per year) th<strong>an</strong> the rate of increase of population (1.8%<br />
per year). If this trend is not reversed/ severe food shortage will occur in<br />
the next century. The present world population of 5.8 billion is likely to<br />
reach 6.0 billion in 2000 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 8.2 billion in 2025. The population of rice<br />
consumers is rapidly increasing <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> will probably increase by 60% in the<br />
next 25 years. It is estimated that dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for rice will exceed production<br />
by the early part of the next century (Pinstrup-Anderson/ 1994).<br />
Major increases in the area pl<strong>an</strong>ted to rice are unlikely. The area<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ted to rice has remained stable since 1980. Moreover/ a diminution in<br />
the area pl<strong>an</strong>ted to rice is likely because of the pressures on good rice l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
from urb<strong>an</strong>ization <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> industrialization. The increased dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for rice *<br />
* International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines.
100 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
will have to be met from less l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, with less water, less labor, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> less<br />
pesticides. Therefore, rice varieties with higher yield potential <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> better<br />
m<strong>an</strong>agement practices are needed to meet the goals of increased rice<br />
production. In its strategy document for 2000 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> beyond, the<br />
International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (IRRI) accorded highest priority to<br />
increase the genetic yield potential of rice (IRRI, 1989).<br />
The yield potential of current high-yielding rice varieties in the<br />
tropics is 10 t ha'^ during the dry season <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 6.5 t ha'^ during the wet<br />
season. Pl<strong>an</strong>t physiologists have suggested that physical enviror<strong>an</strong>ent in<br />
the tropics is not a limiting factor .for increasing rice yields. Maximum<br />
yield potential was estimated to be 9.5 t ha'^ during the wet season <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
15.9 t ha'^ during the dry season (Yoshida, 1981).<br />
MODIFICATION OF RICE PLANT IN THE 1960s<br />
Pre-green revolution rice varieties were tall <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leafy with weak stems<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> produced a total biomass (leaves, stems, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grain) of about 12 t.<br />
When nitrogenous fertilizer was applied at rates exceeding 40 kgha'^,<br />
these traditional varieties tillered profusely, grew excessively tall, lodged<br />
early, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the biomass could not be increased by fertilization. These<br />
varieties had a harvest index (ratio of dry grain weight to total dry matter<br />
or biomass) of 0.3. Thus of 12 tons biomass, about 30% was grain or a<br />
maximum yield of about 4 t ha"\ To increase the yield potential of<br />
tropical rice, it was necessary to improve the harvest index as well as<br />
total biomass or nitrogen responsiveness. This was accomplished by<br />
reducing the pl<strong>an</strong>t height through the incorporation of a recessive gene<br />
sd~l for short stature from a Chinese variety Dee-geo-woo-gen (Fig. 5.1)<br />
(Khush, 1995). The first semidwarf variety IR8, developed at IRRI, also<br />
had a combination of other desirable features such as profuse tillering,<br />
dark green <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> erect leaves, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sturdy stems. It had a harvest index of<br />
0.45 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> did not lodge when high doses of nitrogenous fertilizer were<br />
applied. With proper fertilization it could produce 18 t biomass per ha<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a grain yield of 8 1 ha'\ Thus the yield potential of tropical rice was<br />
doubled from 4 to 8 t ha'^ through modification of pl<strong>an</strong>t type. Since the<br />
development of IR8 in 1966, the yield potential of rice has been improved<br />
at the rate of about 1% per year. Thus IR72 released in 1980 produces a<br />
biomass of about 20 t ha'^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a harvest index of 0.5. It yields<br />
10 t ha'^ under proper m<strong>an</strong>agement.<br />
NEW PLANT TYPE FOR INCREASED YIELD POTENTIAL<br />
As discussed above, yield is a function of total dry matter or biomass<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the harvest index. Therefore, to further increase the yield potential
Gurdev S. Khush 101<br />
Fig. 5.1<br />
Plots of a conventional rice variety (left) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong> improved high-yielding<br />
variety (right).<br />
of tropical rice^ we have to either increase the total biomass production<br />
or the harvest index or both. We conceptualized a pl<strong>an</strong>t type to increase<br />
the biomass to about 23 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> harvest index to 0.55. Such a pl<strong>an</strong>t should<br />
produce a grain yield of about 12.5 t or <strong>an</strong> increase of 25% over the yield<br />
of existing high-yielding varieties*<br />
The harvest index c<strong>an</strong> be increased by increasing the proportion of<br />
energy stored in the grain or by increasing the sink size. The sink size<br />
c<strong>an</strong> be increased by:<br />
• larger number of spikelets per p<strong>an</strong>icle or ear,<br />
• greater partition of photosynthesis in spikelet formation,<br />
• increased spikelet filling,<br />
• slow leaf senescence,<br />
• mainten<strong>an</strong>ce of healthy root system, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
• increased lodging resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Biomass c<strong>an</strong> be increased by both genetic m<strong>an</strong>ipulation as well as by<br />
better m<strong>an</strong>agement practices. Varietal characteristics for increasing the<br />
biomass include;<br />
• establishment of desirable leaf c<strong>an</strong>opy structure,<br />
• rapid leaf area development,<br />
• rapid nutrient uptake, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
• increased lodging resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
To achieve these goals, a new pl<strong>an</strong>t type was conceptualized with the<br />
following attributes (Fig. 5.2) (Khush, 1994).<br />
• lower tillering capacity,<br />
• no unproductive tillers.
102 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
- . M l<br />
'V /-''’M '-vt .SM' i ■ '. : ■<br />
r !/<br />
/f'íMvV<br />
\hAA/X<br />
' ■<br />
■'"MV'-T';<br />
■ A y<br />
'/ 0 V<br />
/fw-"<br />
' ¥ :/m A<br />
■ \ a<br />
Fig. 5.2<br />
Sketches of different pl<strong>an</strong>t types of rice. Left: tall traditional pl<strong>an</strong>t type;<br />
Center; improved high-yielding high tillering pl<strong>an</strong>t type; Right:<br />
proposed low tillering ideotype of super rice.<br />
I; i<br />
• 200-250 grains per p<strong>an</strong>icle^<br />
• 90-100 cm height,<br />
• very sturdy stems,<br />
• dark green thick <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> erect leaves,<br />
• thicker <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> deeper roots,<br />
• multiple disease <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insect resist<strong>an</strong>ce, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
• acceptable grain quality<br />
Reduced Tillering<br />
Increases in the yield potential of other cereals such as maize <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
sorghum have resulted from increases in sink size (ear size). Selection<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>breeding</strong> for large sink size were accomp<strong>an</strong>ied by a decrease in tiller<br />
number. Modern maize <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sorghum varieties have a single culm (stem),<br />
whereas primitive maize <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sorghum had a large number of tillers with<br />
small cobs (or ears) (Khush, 1993). Teosinte, the <strong>an</strong>cestor of maize, has<br />
20-25 tillers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> small cobs with a few grains. The agriculturists who<br />
domesticated maize in the Americas continued to select maize with large<br />
cobs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> this resulted in reduced tiller number. By the fifteenth century,<br />
when maize was introduced into Europe, it had only 4-5 tillers. Further
Gurdev S, Khush 103<br />
selection resulted in uniculm pl<strong>an</strong>ts y/ith very large cobs. Single culm<br />
sorghums were bred in the post-Mendeli<strong>an</strong> era.<br />
By contrast, modern rice varieties produce 20-25 tillers under<br />
favorable growth conditions. Only 14-15 of these tillers produce<br />
p<strong>an</strong>icles, w h ich , are small, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the rest remain unproductive.<br />
Unproductive tillers compete with productive tillers for solar energy<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mineral nutrients— especially nitrogen. Elimination of the<br />
unproductive tillers could direct more nutrients to grain production.<br />
Furthermore, dense foliage that results from excess tiller production<br />
creates a humid microenvironment favorable to disease <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insect buildup.<br />
Reduced tillering also facilitates synchronous flowering <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
maturity, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more uniform p<strong>an</strong>icle size. Genotypes with lower tiller<br />
number are also reported to produce a larger proportion of heavier<br />
grains (Padmaja Rao, 1987).<br />
The number of grains produced per unit of l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> area primarily<br />
determines the grain yield in cereal crops grown in high-yield<br />
environments without stress (Takeda, 1984). Increasing the number of<br />
p<strong>an</strong>icles or the number of grains per p<strong>an</strong>icle c<strong>an</strong> increase the number of<br />
grains per unit l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> area. The modern high-yielding varieties have a<br />
much higher p<strong>an</strong>icle number th<strong>an</strong> the traditional rice varieties they have<br />
replaced. There is a limit to how much the number of p<strong>an</strong>icles c<strong>an</strong> be<br />
increased. Additional tillers become unproductive, produce excessive<br />
vegetative growth, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> have a higher proportion of unfilled grains.<br />
Hence, the approach is to increase the number of grains per p<strong>an</strong>icle rather<br />
th<strong>an</strong> the number of p<strong>an</strong>icles per imit area.<br />
Grain Density <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Grain-filling Percentage<br />
Larger grains tend to be chalky <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thus have a lower market value.<br />
Medium-size grains with high density (higher specific gravity) are more<br />
desirable. High-density grains tend to occur on primary br<strong>an</strong>ches of. the<br />
p<strong>an</strong>icle, whereas the grains of the secondary br<strong>an</strong>ches have lower density<br />
(Ahn, 1986). Low tillering varieties have more primary tillers per unit<br />
l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> area. Thus, they should produce a higher proportion of high-density<br />
grains <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> contribute to increased yield potential,<br />
A variable proportion of grains in rice varieties remains unfilled.<br />
Higher grain-filling rates are essential to achieve maximum yield.<br />
Photosynthate (carbohydrate) production in leaves <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stems, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>slocation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> accumulation in the grains, are prerequisites for higher<br />
grain-filling rates. For higher photosynthate production, dark green <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
thick leaves that senesce (die) slowly are desirable. Thicker stems have<br />
more vascular bundles, which provide a more effective system to<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sport photosynthates to the grains. Thicker stems also contribute to<br />
lodging resist<strong>an</strong>ce.
104 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chgillenges<br />
Leaf Characteristics<br />
Light is used more efficiently if the leaves are erect (Yoshida, 1976).<br />
Therefore <strong>an</strong> erect leaf <strong>an</strong>gle is a desirable trait for achieving high yield.<br />
Photosynthesis is greater when leaves are exposed to light on both sides,<br />
as in erect leaves. Droopy leaves are exposed to light only on one side.<br />
They also raise the relative humidity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reduce the temperature since<br />
they lessen light penetration <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> air movement. Thicker leaves generally<br />
contain more nitrogen per unit leaf area <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> have a higher photosynthetic<br />
rate. Thick <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> green leaves may show slower leaf senescence.<br />
Growth Duration<br />
The optimum growth duration for maximum rice yield in the tropics is<br />
thought to be 120 days from seed to seed. In tr<strong>an</strong>spl<strong>an</strong>ted rice, varieties of<br />
shorter growth duration usually give lower yields when pl<strong>an</strong>ted at<br />
conventional spacing, since they do not produce sufficient vegetative<br />
growth for maximum yield (Yoshida, 1976). Growth duration of about<br />
120 d allows the pl<strong>an</strong>t to utilize more soil, nitrogen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> solar radiation,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> results in higher yields. However, for adaptation to various cropping<br />
systems, varieties with varying growth duration of 100-130 d are<br />
required.<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>t Height, Stem Thickness, Biomass Production<br />
Short stature reduces the susceptibility of rice crop to lodging <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leads<br />
to a higher harvest index. A pl<strong>an</strong>t height of 90-100 cm is considered<br />
ideal for maximum yield. Increased biomass production is not difficult<br />
to achieve when the rice crop is grown in a high solar radiation<br />
environment, provided there is <strong>an</strong> ample supply of nitrogen (Akita,<br />
1989). Without strong, thick culms, however, increased biomass results in<br />
lodging, mutual shading, increased disease incidence, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lower yield<br />
(Vergara, 1988). Hence the import<strong>an</strong>ce of sturdy stems for lodging<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce in raising the biomass production.<br />
Roots are foundations of pl<strong>an</strong>ts, yet they remain relatively unstudied<br />
compared to the rest of the pl<strong>an</strong>t. <strong>Rice</strong> varieties differ as much in the pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
parts below the soil surface as in the parts above ground. For example,<br />
different cultivars are known to have different lengths, degrees of<br />
br<strong>an</strong>ching, volumes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thickness. Thicker <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> deeper roots provide
Gurdev S. Khush 105<br />
better <strong>an</strong>chorage <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lodging resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Healthy roots are more efficient<br />
at supplying nutrients, particularly during the grain-filling period.<br />
Disease <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Insect Resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
For the full expression of yield potential, genetic resist<strong>an</strong>ce to diseases<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insects is essential. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce is even more import<strong>an</strong>t under tropical<br />
conditions. Major diseases of rice are blast, bacterial blight, sheath blight,<br />
grassy stunt <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tungro viruses. Major insects are brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper,<br />
green leafhopper <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stem borers.<br />
Grain Quality<br />
In the tropics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subtropics, consumers prefer long, slender <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
tr<strong>an</strong>slucent grains with intermediate amylose content <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> intermediate<br />
gelatinization temperature. <strong>Rice</strong>s with such characteristics are soft <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
moist when cooked <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> remain soft upon cooling. Short grained rices<br />
with low amylose content <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> low gelatinization temperature are sticky<br />
when cooked <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are preferred in temperate areas such as Jap<strong>an</strong>, Korea,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> China.<br />
BREEDING FOR NEW PLANT TYPE<br />
Breeding work on the new pl<strong>an</strong>t type popularly known as "super rice"<br />
was started in 1989. About 2,000 entries from the IRRI germplasm b<strong>an</strong>k<br />
were grown to identify parents or donors for various traits. Parents for<br />
low tillering, large p<strong>an</strong>icles, thick stems, a vigorous root system, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
thick dark green leaves were identified. Hybridization was undertaken in<br />
the 1990 dry season. To begin with, these parents were crossed with a<br />
short statured parent <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>breeding</strong> lines with short stature <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
aforementioned traits were selected. These lines were intercrossed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t types with the proposed ideotype were selected. To date, over 2,100<br />
crosses have been made <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more th<strong>an</strong> 110,000 pedigree nursery rows<br />
have been grown. Numerous <strong>breeding</strong> lines with targeted traits have<br />
been selected. These lines have short stature, 6-10 tillers, dark green <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
erect leaves <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> large p<strong>an</strong>icles with 200-250 grains per p<strong>an</strong>icle. A pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
of one such line is shown in Fig. 5.3. The yield potential of these new<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t type lines is being evaluated in replicated yield trials under various<br />
m<strong>an</strong>agement practices. On the basis of observational trials the following<br />
characteristics of the new pl<strong>an</strong>t type lines (NPT) have been observed:<br />
• The NPT lines produced 6-10 tillers versus 25-27 tillers for<br />
modern high-yielding lines.
106 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
I<br />
Fig. 5.3<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>ts of super rice (left) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> modern high yielding variety (right).<br />
The number of grains per p<strong>an</strong>icle in the NPT lines was 2-3 times<br />
greater th<strong>an</strong> IR72, the modern high-yielding variety.<br />
Some of the NPT lines had 20% more grains per square meter of<br />
l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> th<strong>an</strong> IR72 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thus a 20% larger potential sink size.<br />
Photosynthesis per unit area of single leaves in the new pl<strong>an</strong>t type<br />
lines was 10-15% higher th<strong>an</strong> that of IR72 at the vegetative <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
reproductive phases. This adv<strong>an</strong>tage was mainly due to a higher<br />
concentration of leaf nitrogen in the NPT lines.<br />
The NPT lines had greener, thicker, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more erect leaves th<strong>an</strong><br />
those of IR72. They had one or two more functional leaves at<br />
flowering compared to IR72.<br />
The flag leaves of NPT lines (the keys to photosynthesis during<br />
grain filling) appear to function photosynthetically longer th<strong>an</strong><br />
those of IR72. This may result in a longer grain-filling period <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
contribute to increased yield potential.
Gurdev S. Khush 107<br />
• The NPT lines have thicker <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sturdier stems, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> much greater<br />
lodging resist<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />
• The growth duration of NPT lines is similar (110-120 d) to that of<br />
IR72.<br />
Improvements Still Needed<br />
l^ce germplasm is classified into two broad groups-indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japorüca.<br />
Indica varieties are grown in the tropics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subtropics. Modern highyielding<br />
varieties, grown in the tropics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subtropics belong to the<br />
indica group while those grown in the temperate areas belong to japónica<br />
group. Some japónica varieties are grown in the tropics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are called<br />
tropical japónicas in contrast to temperate japónicas grown in Jap<strong>an</strong>,<br />
Korea, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> northern China. Improved indicas have long slender grains<br />
whereas most of the japónicas have short bold grains. For developing the<br />
NPT lines, tropical japónica parents were used because m<strong>an</strong>y of them<br />
have large p<strong>an</strong>icles, some have low tillering ability, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> others have<br />
thick stems <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a vigorous root system. However, they have short bold<br />
grains. Consequently, the NPT lines also have short bold grains.<br />
Preference in the tropics is for long slender grains. Therefore, a few<br />
tropical japónica parents with long slender grains were identified <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
crossed with NPT lines. NPT lines with long slender grains are now<br />
being selected.<br />
Most of the NPT lines lack resist<strong>an</strong>ce to tropical diseases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insects<br />
as the parents used for developing these lines are susceptible. However,<br />
donors for blast <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bacterial blight were identified within the tropical<br />
japónica germplasm <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> utilized in the hybridization program. NPT lines<br />
with resist<strong>an</strong>ce to blast <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bacterial blight have now been selected.<br />
Genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper, green leafhopper <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tungro<br />
viruses are being incorporated from the indica germplasm through<br />
backcrossing <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> molecular marker-aided selection.<br />
PROSPECTS FOR NEW PLANT TYPE<br />
It is expected that during the next 3-4 years, NPT lines with all the<br />
desirable traits will become available. These lines will be shared with the<br />
national rice improvement programs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> evaluated under local<br />
conditions. Those found suitable will be multiplied <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> released for onfarm<br />
production. Thus NPT varieties should be widely grown by 2005.<br />
When pl<strong>an</strong>ted widely in the tropics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subtropics, they will help feed<br />
300 million more rice consumers.<br />
NPT lines could not be adapted for growing in the temperate areas<br />
as they lack cold toler<strong>an</strong>ce, one of the most import<strong>an</strong>t adaptability traits
108 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
of temperate rices. However, NPT lines could be useful parents for<br />
increasing the yield potential of temperate rice. Collaboration has been<br />
established wiüi the rice improvement programs of Korea <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Egypt to<br />
breed NPT varieties adapted to local conditions.<br />
NPT varieties will also be useful for increasing the level of heterosis<br />
(yield adv<strong>an</strong>tage) of hybrid rice. Most of the hybrid rices grown in China<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> elsewhere are based on indica germplasm <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> show yield adv<strong>an</strong>tage<br />
of 10-15%. The level of heterosis depends on the genetic dist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
between the parents. Since the NPT lines are based on japónica<br />
germplasm, hybrids between them <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the elite indica lines show yield<br />
adv<strong>an</strong>tage of 20-25% (Khush <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Aquino, 1994). Thus the NPT rices will<br />
also be useful in increasing the yield potential of hybrid rice.<br />
References<br />
Ahn, J.K. 1986. Physiological factors affecting grain filling in rice. Ph.D. thesis, Uiriv.<br />
Philippines, Los Baños, Philippines.<br />
Akita, S. 1989, Improving yield potential in tropical rice. In: Progress in Irrigated <strong>Rice</strong> Research,<br />
(IRRI), M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 41-73.<br />
IRRI (International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute) 1989. IRRI towards 2000 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> beyond, (IRRI), Los<br />
Baños, Philippines.<br />
Khush, G.S. 1993. Varietal needs for different environments <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>breeding</strong> strategies. In: New<br />
Frontiers in <strong>Rice</strong> Research, K. Muralidhar<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> E.A. Siddiq (eds.) Directorate of <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research, Hyderabad, India, pp. 68-75.<br />
Khush, G.S. 1994, Increasing the genetic yield potential of rice: prospects <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> approaches.<br />
Inti. <strong>Rice</strong> Comm. News/., 43:1-8.<br />
Khush, G.S. 1995. Modern varieties—their real contribution to food supply <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> equity. Geo).<br />
35(3): 275-284.<br />
Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Aquino, R.C. 1994. Breeding tropical japónicas for hybrid rice production.<br />
In: Hj/brid <strong>Rice</strong> Technology: New Developments <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Future Prospects. S.S., Virm<strong>an</strong>i, (ed.)<br />
IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp, 33-36.<br />
Padmaja Rao, S. 1987. High density grain among primary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> secondary tillers of short- <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
long-duration rices. Inti. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newsl. 12(4): 12.<br />
Pinstrup-Anderson, P. 1994. World food trends <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> future food security. Food Policy Report.<br />
Inti Food Policy Res. Inst., Washington, DC.<br />
Takeda, T. 1984. Physiological <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ecological characteristics of high yielding varieties of<br />
lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice. In: Proc. Inti. Crop Sci. Symp., Fukuoka, Jap<strong>an</strong>.<br />
Vergara, B.S. 1988. Raising the yield potential of rice. Philippine Tech. f. 13:3-9.<br />
Yoshida, S. 1976. Physiological consequences of altering pl<strong>an</strong>t type <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> maturity. In: Proc.<br />
Inti <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Conf., Inti. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Inst,, Los Baños, Philippines.<br />
Yoshida, S. 1981. Fundamentals of <strong>Rice</strong> Crop Science. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines.
6<br />
Hybrid Sterility in <strong>Rice</strong>—Its<br />
Genetics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Implication to<br />
Differentiation of Cultivated<br />
<strong>Rice</strong><br />
H. Ikehashi*<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Ch<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ratna (1964) reviewed the cytological basis of hybrid sterility. Oka<br />
(1974) proposed a theory of gamete abortion by duplicate recessive<br />
gamete lethal genes. Further studies by the present author <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
coworkers have shown that <strong>an</strong> allelic interaction at a single locus is<br />
responsible for gamete abortion.<br />
In typical Indica-Japonica crosses, hybrid sterility is caused by <strong>an</strong><br />
allelic interaction at locus S-5, where Indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Japónica cultivars carry<br />
S-5' <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S-5^ alleles respectively, while some cultivars have a neutral<br />
allele, S-5”. The S-5VS-5^ genotype produces semi-sterile p<strong>an</strong>icles due to<br />
partial abortion of female gametes carrying the allele of S-5^ (Fig. 6.1 A).<br />
Such abortion does not occur in S-5”/S-5' <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 5-5“/S-5^ genotypes<br />
(Big. 6.1B). The donor of S-5" is referred to as the widely compatible<br />
variety (WCV) (ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki, 1986). As soon as the simple<br />
monogenic nature of hybrid sterility was understood, it was applied to<br />
Faculty of Agriculture, Kyoto Ur\iversity, Jap<strong>an</strong>.
lio <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
hybrid rice <strong>breeding</strong> to enh<strong>an</strong>ce the level of heterosis.. This allele has<br />
been incorporated into Indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Japónica varieties to overcome hybrid<br />
sterility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to realize pronounced heterosis in inter-subspecific hybrids<br />
(Ikehashi, 1991; Yu<strong>an</strong>a^ 1992; Zou et ah, 1992).<br />
GENETICS OF HYBRID STERILITY<br />
The allele S-5” has been effective for a large number of Indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Japónica crosses. Of the more th<strong>an</strong> 10,000 varieties from China, only a few<br />
show hybrid sterility in their crosses to WCVs (W<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, 1995a).<br />
However, in a broad r<strong>an</strong>ge of varietal testing, such WCVs exhibited<br />
hybrid sterility when crossed to varieties from the Indi<strong>an</strong> subcontinent or<br />
native varieties in China. Further genetic <strong>an</strong>alyses of hybrid sterility gene<br />
loci (HSGLi) were conducted subsequently.<br />
A large number of three-way crosses (A/B//C) were made after<br />
confirming that a hybrid A /C produced semisterile p<strong>an</strong>icles <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>other<br />
hybrid B /C was fertile. The progeny of A/B//C segregated into<br />
semisterile pl<strong>an</strong>ts as expected from A /C <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fertile ones as expected<br />
from B /C in a ratio of 1 ; 1. When the backcross A/C//C was made, the<br />
progeny resulted in semisterile pl<strong>an</strong>ts as expected from A /C <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fertile<br />
ones from C /C in a certain ratio. Thereafter, such genetic markers<br />
CO segregating with semisterility were surveyed to identify a locus for<br />
semisterility. In the backcrosses, pl<strong>an</strong>ts were used as female to find<br />
the distortion of marker genotypes which was caused by the abortion of<br />
female gametes carrying one of the alleles. Table 6.1 shows <strong>an</strong> inst<strong>an</strong>ce of<br />
such <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>alysis in which the hybrid sterility in a cross between Jaya <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Ket<strong>an</strong> N<strong>an</strong>gkais cosegregated with two markers, Est-9 on chromosome 7<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Est-1 on chromosome 4, but not with Amp-3, which is the marker for<br />
S-5 on chromosome 6. Allelic differences at the new locus were estimated<br />
following the model of allelic interaction at S-5. For three given varieties.<br />
Table 6.1<br />
Distribution of spikelet fertility classified by marker genotype in<br />
Jaya/Ket<strong>an</strong> N<strong>an</strong>gka/ZJCet<strong>an</strong> N<strong>an</strong>gka<br />
Genotype Number of Pl<strong>an</strong>ts in % Spikelet Fertility class Total Me<strong>an</strong><br />
S . 1<br />
1 0 2 0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1 0 0<br />
Est-9VEst-9^ 0 0 0 1 â 3 7 9 23 1 2 59»* 77.68*'"<br />
Est-9^/Est-9^ 0 1 6 2 2 18 13 É 7 a 2 83 50.1<br />
Est-lVEst-l° 0 0 0 1 1 1 9 12 2 2 11 57** 78.9**<br />
Est-lV Est-l“ 0 1 6 23 2 0 15 4 4 2 a 85 49.8<br />
Amp-3 VAmp-3^ 0 0 2 13 10 9 5 9 16 8 77 61.3<br />
Amp-3^/Amp-3^ 0 1 4 11 11 7 8 7 15 6 75 60.4<br />
** Shows signific<strong>an</strong>t difference between two genotypes at 1%.<br />
Underlined numbers are assumed recombin<strong>an</strong>ts.
H. Ikehashi 111<br />
©<br />
0<br />
0<br />
©<br />
VO<br />
bi)<br />
©<br />
'a (1) tu<br />
4-1 4-1<br />
U cu<br />
o E<br />
,Q fd<br />
(d tn<br />
nH0)<br />
(d44<br />
E OJ<br />
n E<br />
o d<br />
C Ö1<br />
■n<br />
rH tn<br />
\ txT<br />
p4 ‘H<br />
4-)<br />
tí u<br />
M 4J<br />
o tí<br />
XI -H<br />
X<br />
cd<br />
u<br />
1<br />
XI<br />
« í
112 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
A, B <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> N/ if a hybrid A /B showed gamete abortion at a HSGL S-X, but<br />
N /A <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> N /B showed no distorted segregation of markers for S-X, the<br />
variety N was determined to possess a neutral allele S-Xn at the new<br />
locus.<br />
IDENTIFICATION OF HYBRID STERIUTY GENE LOCI (HSGLi)<br />
AND MARKERS<br />
A number of new HSGLi were identified, as shown in Table 6.2. A locus<br />
S-7 was detected in hybrids between aus varieties (summer rice in Indi<strong>an</strong><br />
subcontinent) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> some jav<strong>an</strong>icas (Y<strong>an</strong>agihara et al., 1992). A lociis S-8<br />
was detected in a hybrid between a Kore<strong>an</strong> indica variety <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> some<br />
jav<strong>an</strong>icas (W<strong>an</strong> et al, 1993). A locus S-9 was detected in hybrids between<br />
aus varieties <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> some jav<strong>an</strong>icas (W<strong>an</strong> et al., 1996a). A locus S-15 was<br />
found in hybrids between <strong>an</strong> aus variety Dular (WCV) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> some IRRI<br />
lines IR2061 (W<strong>an</strong> et al,, 1996a). A locus S-16 was identified near Est-1 on<br />
chromosome 1 in hybrids between Ket<strong>an</strong> N<strong>an</strong>gka <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> local varieties in<br />
the Tai-hu Lake region of Yxmn<strong>an</strong> province in China (W<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi,<br />
1995a). Locus S-17 (t) was identified in crosses between Penuh Baru II<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> some japónicas (W<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, 1995c). Isozyme <strong>an</strong>alyses were<br />
conducted according to Ishikawa et al. (1989) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n et al.<br />
(1988). From these genetic <strong>an</strong>alyses, a number of tester varieties are being<br />
developed. Such tester varieties maybe used to identify respective alleles<br />
in other varieties.<br />
Table 6,2<br />
Loci for Hybrid Sterility<br />
' Locus Chromosome Marker genes in order Crosses<br />
1; S-5 6 wx, C, S-5, Amp-3, Est-2 Indica/Japónica<br />
Pgi-2, RG213, alk<br />
liv S-7 7 Rc, S-7, Est-9, rfs Aus/Jav<strong>an</strong>ica<br />
j j<br />
Ga-11, Acp-4<br />
■F S-8 6 Cat-1, Pox-5, S-8 IR2061 /Jav<strong>an</strong>ica<br />
s-9 , 4 Ph, Ig, Mal-1, Est-1, S-9 Aus/Jav<strong>an</strong>ica<br />
S-15 1 2 Acp-1, Pox-2, S-15, Sdh-1 IR2061 /Dular(Aus)<br />
'■':;j S-16 1 Linked Est-5 (15-20%) China N./Jav<strong>an</strong>ica<br />
S-17(t) 12 Pox-2, S-15, Sdh-1, S-17(t) P.B. Il/Japonica<br />
Initially, three alleles were identified at locus S-5. In the course of<br />
further <strong>an</strong>alysis, however, allelic differentiation at HSGLi was shown to<br />
form a number of alleles at a single locus. Especially in Indi<strong>an</strong> varieties,<br />
more th<strong>an</strong> five alleles were identified at S-7 using a set of testers. In the<br />
survey of diversity of alleles at HSGLi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> isozymes in Chinese varieties<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> summer rice of India (Aus), the Indi<strong>an</strong> cultivars showed the highest
H. Ikehashi 113<br />
diversity in terms of alleles at HSGLi (W<strong>an</strong>- <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, 1997). For<br />
inst<strong>an</strong>ce, Basmati 370 showed several loci for hybrid sterility (Table 6.3),<br />
viz.. S-8, S"7 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S-5 (W<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, 1995b). In contrast, hybrid<br />
sterility in typical indica-japonica crosses was predomin<strong>an</strong>tly controlled<br />
by alleles at S-5.<br />
HYBRID STERILITY IN POLLEN AND HYBRID RICE<br />
Hybrid sterility is also expressed in pollen. Genetic <strong>an</strong>alyses for hybrid<br />
sterility in pollen were difficult, as there are a large number of pollen<br />
genotypes in a single spikelet. Recently, it has become possible to<br />
identify some loci for pollen sterility at a locus on chromosome 7 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
<strong>an</strong>other on chromosome 12 (W<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, 1996c). At ga-11 locus on<br />
chromosome 7, pollen carrying <strong>an</strong> indica-type allele was found to abort<br />
in the heterozygote. Thus, its mech<strong>an</strong>ism is the same as that of female<br />
gametes. It is therefore clear that hybrid sterility for pollen (male<br />
gamete) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> spikelet (female gamete) is independently controlled. This<br />
is because a new gene responsible for both female <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> male abortion<br />
may not be conserved.<br />
Although a high level of heterosis was realized in indica-japonica<br />
hybrids by utilizing WCG, their pollen fertility was low due to hybrid<br />
sterility expressed in their pollen. The yield of hybrids was unstable in<br />
adverse conditions due to poor pollen viability. Thus the import<strong>an</strong>ce of<br />
WCG for pollen is recognized. The possible solution to this is to develop<br />
indica-jav<strong>an</strong>ica hybrids, as m<strong>an</strong>y jav<strong>an</strong>ica varieties show normal pollen<br />
fertility in their crosses to indicas <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to japónicas ( Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki,<br />
1987). In China, a number of new rice hybrids using jav<strong>an</strong>ica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> indica<br />
varieties have been developed by the two-line system (Bai Del<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Luo Xiaohe, 1996).<br />
SYSTEMATIC ENHANCEMENT OF HETEROSIS<br />
The hybrid sterility genes are diverse in Indi<strong>an</strong> rice varieties (Table 6.3).<br />
A r<strong>an</strong>ge of potential restorers may be narrowed by hybrid sterility in<br />
their crosses to cms lines, if the cms line contains non-neutral hybrid<br />
sterility genes. It may therefore be advisable to incorporate maintainers<br />
having Wide Compatibity gene (WCG) to use a wide r<strong>an</strong>ge of restorers.<br />
There should also be systematic enh<strong>an</strong>cement of heterosis levels through<br />
testing the combining ability of potential maintainers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> restorers. The<br />
signific<strong>an</strong>ce of HSGLi in such a system remains to be investigated.
114 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Table 6.3<br />
Distribution of spikelet fertility (SF) classified by marker<br />
genotype in Basmati crosses<br />
Genotype<br />
Number of pl<strong>an</strong>ts in % spikelet fertility<br />
To 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />
Total<br />
Me<strong>an</strong><br />
Basmati 370 /IR36//IR36<br />
Cat-lVCat-1^ 2 3 3 5 4 6 3 ^ 2 0 52.3**<br />
Cat-lVCat-1^ 2 1 1. 1 1 2 1 17 18 16 61 75.8<br />
SF was not differentiated at Est-2, Est-9, Est-1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sdh-1<br />
Basmati 370/IR2061-628//Basmati 370<br />
Cat-lVCat-l^ 1 1 1 1 0 2 8 10 8 6 38*»<br />
Cat-1 VCat-1^ 3 2 2 4 7 9 a 8 g 4 55<br />
SF was not differentiated at Est-2,Est-9, Est-1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, Sdh-1<br />
Basmati 370/IR2061-418//Basmati 370<br />
76.3*»<br />
51.7<br />
Est-9VEst-9^ 2 2 3 3 6 3 14 a ■ S 4 50** 56.3**<br />
Est-9 VEst-9^ 1 1 1 2 1 1 4 10 10 6 37 74.3<br />
SF was not differentiated at Est-2,.Cat-l, Est-1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sdh-1<br />
, Basmati 370/ Ket<strong>an</strong> N<strong>an</strong>gka / / Akihikari<br />
Amp-3VAmp-3^ 0 1 0 0 3 2 14 11 7 5<br />
Amp-3 VAmp-3^ 2 1 2 3 4 2 4 Z S 3<br />
42<br />
33<br />
76.5**<br />
52.3<br />
Underlined numbers are assumed recombin<strong>an</strong>ts.<br />
** Shows signific<strong>an</strong>t difference between two genotypes at 1%. (W<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, 1995c)<br />
DIFFERENTIATION OF HYBRID STERILITY GENES<br />
An irradiated mut<strong>an</strong>t Miyukimochi (Toda, 1982) was <strong>an</strong>alyzed together<br />
with its original variety, Toyonishiki. The semisterility in hybrids<br />
between Toyonishiki <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR36 was caused by <strong>an</strong> allelic interaction of<br />
S-5VS-5^, whereas the semisterility in hybrids between Miyukimochi<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR36 was attributed to allelic interaction of both S-5VS-5^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S-7VS-<br />
7. Thus, the neutral S-7" in Toyonishiki was found to have mutated into<br />
S-7'' by irradiation with Co^ (W<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, 1996b).<br />
Another case of mutational ch<strong>an</strong>ge of hybrid sterility allele was<br />
found in <strong>an</strong> experimental line, 02428 from China, which possesses the<br />
S-5” allele (Zou et al., 1992). The parents for 02428, P<strong>an</strong>gxiegu <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Jib<strong>an</strong>gdao, were found to possess S-5^. The allele S-5” in 02428 was<br />
considered to be induced from S-5^ by irradiation of the parents with<br />
Co® (W<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, 1996b).<br />
The above incidences of mutation explain the way by which a new<br />
allele is fixed. In the first case, a mut<strong>an</strong>t allele S-7^ was induced in the<br />
background of a neutral allele S-7” in Toyonishiki, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the heterozygote<br />
produced S-7"/S-7" <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S-7VS-7^ without showing sterility. In similar<br />
ways, a number of new alleles might have been conserved in rice, as selffertilization<br />
is predomin<strong>an</strong>t in this crop (Fig. 6.2). It is of interest that a<br />
series of new alleles may easily be fixed under a genetic background of
H. Ikehashi 115<br />
Q s - x v s - r<br />
genetic drift<br />
S-XVS-X"<br />
< o<br />
Fig. 6.2 Origin of hybrid sterility alleles at a locus.<br />
neutral alleles^ while a different series of alleles under a different genetic<br />
background. Thus, it is underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>able that a varietal group contains a<br />
series of alleles without revealing a high level of hybrid sterility as found<br />
in intergroup hybrids. In test crosses among aus cultivars from the Indi<strong>an</strong><br />
subcontinent, almost all the crosses showed no hybrid sterility, but the<br />
same cultivars showed a wide r<strong>an</strong>ge of hybrid sterility when testcrossed<br />
with jav<strong>an</strong>ica, indicating their differentiation of alleles at HSGLs<br />
as in the case of Jaya/Ket<strong>an</strong> N<strong>an</strong>gka (Table 6.2). Likewise, relatively few<br />
cultivars showed hybrid sterility in crosses among jav<strong>an</strong>ica cultivars<br />
(Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki, 1987).<br />
VARIETAL DIFFERENTIATION AND HYBRID STERILITY<br />
Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n (1987) has shown that there are predomin<strong>an</strong>tly indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
japónica types in East Asia while there are a series of intermediate types<br />
in the Indi<strong>an</strong> subcontinent (Fig. 6.3), He suggested that they are<br />
alternative gene pools. In the light of our <strong>an</strong>alysis of hybrid sterility<br />
genes, the hybrid sterility in Chinese cultivars was found to be caused<br />
mostly by <strong>an</strong> allelic interaction at S-5, while the hybrid sterility genes in<br />
Indi<strong>an</strong> cultivars were found to be very much differentiated. The two<br />
predomin<strong>an</strong>t types in East Asia c<strong>an</strong> be understood if the two were<br />
introduced originally from diverse sources as was the one in the Indi<strong>an</strong><br />
subcontinent <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> propagated in the course of cultivation (Fig. 6.4).
116 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
,__ I<br />
' S<br />
'-T'<br />
&<br />
/ \<br />
! / \<br />
c Q \<br />
VII<br />
Fig. 6.3<br />
Distribution of 1688 Asi<strong>an</strong> rice varieties in 6 varietal groups based on<br />
isozyme variation at 15 loci. Groups are designated I to VI; class 0<br />
corresponds to unclassified varieties from J.C. Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n, 1987.<br />
The mutation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fixation of hybrid sterility genes may not initially be<br />
evident^ as indicated in Fig. 6.3. After isolation of some groups by hum<strong>an</strong><br />
activities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sporadic hybridization among them, such hybrid sterility<br />
became apparent. Hybrid sterility in rice is cited as a major reproductive<br />
barrier, which may cause isolation of varietal groups <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lead to<br />
differentiation. The hybrid sterility may be indicative of varietal<br />
differentiation, which might be caused by the dissemination of a few<br />
genetically narrow types in the exp<strong>an</strong>sion of rice cultivation. It is<br />
import<strong>an</strong>t for breeders to underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that hybrid sterility is h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>led by<br />
genetic m<strong>an</strong>ipulations. The concept of hybrid barrier should be critically<br />
examined in the light of active <strong>breeding</strong>.<br />
I. I
118 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
References<br />
\<br />
i' I<br />
Bai Del<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Luo Xiaohe, 1996. Li<strong>an</strong>gyou Peite, a new tw6 -line hybrid rice released in<br />
China. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Notes. 21(1); 42-43.<br />
Ch<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ratna^ M.F. 1964. Genetics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Breeding of <strong>Rice</strong>. Chap.5, Longm<strong>an</strong>, London, pp. 389.<br />
Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n, J.C. 1987. Theor, Appl. Genet., 74:21-30.<br />
Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n, J.C., Reyes, B.G. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1988. Electrophoretic variation of isozymes in<br />
plumules of rice (Oryza sativa L.)—a key to the identification of 76 alleles at 24 loci. IRRI<br />
Research Paper Series No.134,<br />
Ikehashi, H. 1991. Genetics of hybrid sterility in wide hybridization in rice. In: Biotechnology<br />
in Agriculture <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Forestry, Vol.l4. <strong>Rice</strong>, Y.P.S. Bajaj (ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin<br />
Heidlberg, pp. 113-127.<br />
Ikehashi, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki, H. 1986. Genetics of sterility in remote crosses of rice. In; <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genetics, IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 119-130.<br />
Ikehashi, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki, H. 1987. Screening <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis of wide compatibility in<br />
hybrids of dist<strong>an</strong>t crosses in rice Oryza sativa L. Tech. Bull. Trap. Agr. Res. Center, Jap<strong>an</strong>,<br />
No. 23.<br />
Ichikawa, R., Mqrishima, H., Mori K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kinoshita, T. 1989. Chromosomal <strong>an</strong>alysis of<br />
isozyme loci <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> allelic expression at cellular level in rice. /. Fac. Agr. Hokkaido Univ.<br />
64(1); 85-98.<br />
Oka, H. 1974. Analysis of genes controlling Fj sterility in rice by the use of isogenic lines.<br />
Genetics 77; 521-534.<br />
Toda, M. 1982. The <strong>breeding</strong> of four new mut<strong>an</strong>t varieties by gamma-rays in rice. Report of<br />
symp. Breeding of Varieties by Use of Radiations. Gamma Field Symposia 21:7-15.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>, J., Y<strong>an</strong>agihara, S., Kato H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, H. 1993. Multiple alleles at a new locus<br />
causing hybrid sterility between Kore<strong>an</strong> indica variety <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a jav<strong>an</strong>ica variety in rice<br />
{Oryza sativa L.). Jap. /. Breed. 43:507-^516.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, H. 1995a. Identification of a new locus S-16 causing hybrid sterility in<br />
native rice varieties {Oryza sativa L.) from Tai-hu lake region <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yunn<strong>an</strong> Province,"<br />
China. Breed. Sci. 45:461-470.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, H, 1995b. Loci for hybrid sterility in Basmati crosses. Inti. <strong>Rice</strong> Res.<br />
Notes. 20:4.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, H. 1995c. A new locus for hybrid sterility in remote crosses of<br />
cultivated rice {Oryza sativa L.) Breed. Sci. 6 . Suppl. 2:191.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>, J., Yamaguchi, Y., Kato, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, H. 1996a. Two new loci for hybrid sterility in<br />
rice {Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:183-190.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, H. 1996b. Evidence for mutational origin of hybrid sterility genes in<br />
rice (Oryza sativa L.). Breed. Sci. 46:169-174.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, H, 1996c. A new locus for hybrid sterility in remote crosses of<br />
cultivated rice {Oryza sativa L.)7. Breed. Sci. 46, Suppl. 1:87.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, H. 1997. Identification of two types of differentiation in cultivated rice<br />
{Oryza sativa L.) detected by polymorphism of isozymes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hybrid sterility. Euphytica,<br />
94: 151-161. .<br />
Y<strong>an</strong>agihara, S., Kato H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikehashi, H. 1992. A new locus for multiple alleles causing<br />
hybrid sterility between <strong>an</strong> Aus variety <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jav<strong>an</strong>ica varieties in rice (Oiyzfl sativa L.).<br />
Jap. J. Breed. 42: 793-801.<br />
Yu<strong>an</strong>, L. P. 1992. The strategy of the development of hybrid rice <strong>breeding</strong>. In: Current Status<br />
of Two Line Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong> Research. L.P.Yu<strong>an</strong>, (ed.). Agrie. PubL, Ltd., Beijing, pp. 1-5.<br />
Zou, J., Nie, Y., P<strong>an</strong>, Q. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fu, C. 1992. The tentative utilization of wide compatibility strain<br />
02428 in Indica/Japónica rice. In: Current Status of Two Line Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong> Research,<br />
L.P.Yu<strong>an</strong>, (ed.). Agrie. PubL, Ltd., Beijing, pp. 333-339.
A Critical Evaluation of<br />
Current Breeding Strategies<br />
M.J. Lawrence^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D. Senadhira^<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
It has been predicted that world production of rough rice will need to<br />
rise by 70% in the next 35 years in order to keep up with the <strong>an</strong>ticipated<br />
growth in the hum<strong>an</strong> population <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> income-induced dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for food<br />
(IRRI, 1993). There has been no increase in the area pl<strong>an</strong>ted with rice<br />
since 1980, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> increasing urb<strong>an</strong>ization <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> industrialization c<strong>an</strong> be<br />
expected to reduce this area (FAO, 1988). It follows that only raising the<br />
average yields of crops grown in existing areas c<strong>an</strong> increase rice<br />
production. Since 73% of current rice production comes from crops<br />
raised under irrigation, most of the required increase will have to come<br />
from new, high-yielding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stable varieties that have been bred for this<br />
ecosystem.<br />
In principle, <strong>an</strong> increase of 70% should be achievable, not only<br />
because both the world <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Asi<strong>an</strong> production of rice has, as a result of<br />
the work of agronomists <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> breeders, doubled over the past 30 years,<br />
with only a modest concomit<strong>an</strong>t increase in the area devoted to the<br />
irrigated crop but, more particularly, because national yields, in the<br />
^Pl<strong>an</strong>t Genetics Group, School of Biological Sciences^ University of Birmingham, Birmingham<br />
B15 2TT, UK<br />
^ Pl<strong>an</strong>t Breeding, Genetics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Biochemistry Division, International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute,<br />
PO Box 933,1099 M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines
120 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
I■ 'i<br />
I !■<br />
majority of countries, are still well below the maximum possible with<br />
existing cultivars. In practice, however, it may be more difficult to<br />
increase rice production by this amount. First, whereas most modern<br />
indica cultivars are bred for use in tr<strong>an</strong>spl<strong>an</strong>ted crops, <strong>an</strong>ticipated rising<br />
costs of labor will make this traditional practice increasingly uneconomic.<br />
New varieties, therefore, will have to be bred for use in directly<br />
sown crops; this will require a modification of the present IR8 ideotype<br />
towards pl<strong>an</strong>ts which produce fewer tillers, all of which are fertile.<br />
Agronomists may also have to devise better ways of m<strong>an</strong>aging fertilizers<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> controlling weeds in the crop. Secondly, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more import<strong>an</strong>tly<br />
there appears to be a widespread belief among breeders that modern<br />
indica cultivars that have been bred for use as tr<strong>an</strong>spl<strong>an</strong>ted crops in the<br />
lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tropics have reached a yield potential barrier of 10 t ha"^. The<br />
evidence on which this belief is based is that while recently released<br />
cultivars of this type, such as IR64 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR72, achieve higher yields in<br />
agricultural environments th<strong>an</strong> the pioneering variety of this ideotype,<br />
IR8, released in 1966, the yield of the latter differs little from that of the<br />
former in experimental environments in which crops are protected from<br />
attack by pests <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> diseases (Flinn et ah, 1982; Cassm<strong>an</strong> et al., 1994;<br />
Kropff et al, 1994). Hence the superior perform<strong>an</strong>ce of more recent<br />
varieties in agricultural environments is chiefly due to their genetic<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce to a number of import<strong>an</strong>t pests <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> diseases, which IR8 lacks;<br />
that is, their superiority in this respect lies in the fact that they are able to<br />
avoid losses of yield, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thus have a greater yield stability over seasons<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> locations. Nevertheless, these observations suggest that despite 30<br />
years of attempting to breed for increased yield, the yield potential of<br />
the rice crop has remained more or less static.<br />
In <strong>an</strong> attempt to overcome this serious problem, scientists at the<br />
International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (IRRI) have initiated two<br />
alternative <strong>breeding</strong> programs. One involves a radical redefinition of<br />
ideotype, known as new pl<strong>an</strong>t type, in which recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines<br />
are extracted from crosses between temperate <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tropical japónica<br />
cultivars, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the other, the production of hybrid varieties, initially from<br />
crosses between indica parents, but later from indica x japónica crosses<br />
(IRRI, 1989; Khush et al, 1994; Peng et al, 1994). There may be a number<br />
of other reasons for preferring these crosses to those between indica<br />
parents, among which is the desire to reduce p<strong>an</strong>icle number per pl<strong>an</strong>t,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to increase culm thickness <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> number of spikelets per p<strong>an</strong>icle in a<br />
directly seeded crop, as in the new pl<strong>an</strong>t type program, or to exploit<br />
heterosis for yield in hybrid varieties. Nevertheless, the cause or causes<br />
of the yield barrier with indica cultivars appears to have received<br />
surprisingly little attention. So we shall turn first to a discussion of<br />
possible expl<strong>an</strong>ations of this problem before going on to review the
M.J. Lawrence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D. Senadhira 121<br />
results of some experiments which, though undertaken with this<br />
particular problem in mind, have implications for the improvement of<br />
the rice crop in general.<br />
THREE POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS OF THE STASIS FOR YIELD<br />
There are three possible expl<strong>an</strong>ations for this lack of progress with yield.<br />
First, modern indica cultivars of type IRS may have a narrow genetic<br />
base for yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other characters of interest. If so, further subst<strong>an</strong>tial<br />
responses to selection for these characters are unlikely because most of<br />
the increasing alleles at the loci controlling them have become fixed as a<br />
result of past selection or, perhaps, because of the effects of genetic drift<br />
causing r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om fixation of alleles in populations of small effective size<br />
(<strong>an</strong> effect usually overlooked in the literature). In these circumst<strong>an</strong>ces,<br />
selection has reached a limit, which, in the absence of mutation or<br />
introgression of genes from other sources, c<strong>an</strong>not be breached (Falconer<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mackay, 1996). Were this the case, no further expl<strong>an</strong>ation Would be<br />
necessary. The belief that this first expl<strong>an</strong>ation is true appears to have<br />
been one of the reasons underlying the decision to initiate the new pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
type program at IRRI.<br />
Second, though considerable genetic variation for these characters<br />
is, in fact, still present, conventional <strong>breeding</strong> procedures have failed to<br />
exploit it. These methods have, of course, been successfully employed to<br />
produce the great majority of all varieties of small-grain cereals,<br />
including rice. Their success rate per cross is low, however, so breeders<br />
have to make m<strong>an</strong>y hrmdreds of crosses each season to ensure that some<br />
promising lines ultimately emerge from their programs. These methods,<br />
therefore, chief among which is the pedigree method, c<strong>an</strong>not, on this<br />
evidence alone, be regarded as Very efficient. This possibility appears<br />
not to have been considered by breeders at IRRI.<br />
Third, while conventional <strong>breeding</strong> procedures may be reasonably<br />
efficient in exploiting genetical variation when selecting for enh<strong>an</strong>ced<br />
perform<strong>an</strong>ce with single characters, this is not the case when attempting<br />
to select for.a number of characters of interest simult<strong>an</strong>eously. Thus, for<br />
<strong>an</strong> aggregate phenotype consisting of k completely uncorrelated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
equally import<strong>an</strong>t components, if p is the overall proportion of individuals<br />
to he selected, the proportion, p,, selected for each component<br />
considered independently of every other (independently culling levels)<br />
is equal to the /cth root of p„ Unless k is very small, it is not<br />
possible to carry out more th<strong>an</strong> rather weak selection on these<br />
components; for example, if p is 0.05 or 5%, then for <strong>an</strong> aggregate<br />
phenotype consisting of three components, the selection pressure on
122 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
each, measured by pj, c<strong>an</strong> be no greater th<strong>an</strong> 0.37 or 37%. This problem,<br />
for which unfortunately there is no general solution, is, of course,<br />
encountered in virtually all <strong>breeding</strong> programs; if the second<br />
expl<strong>an</strong>ation also holds, this problem will be worse. In the case of indica<br />
cultivars, it is possible that in introgressing genes for disease <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pest<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce from very low yielding donors, via wide hybridization with<br />
other Oryza species, the selection pressure on yield was relaxed in order<br />
to ensure that some resist<strong>an</strong>t recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines were obtained.<br />
Investigating the First Possibility<br />
If the first expl<strong>an</strong>ation is true, evidence for heritable variation for<br />
qu<strong>an</strong>titative characters of interest, including yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its components,<br />
should be scarce in all crosses between indica parents. In consequence,<br />
the heritability of these characters should be low <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> it should be<br />
difficult to extract a recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred line whose perform<strong>an</strong>ce exceeds<br />
that of the better parent from <strong>an</strong>y of these crosses. If, on the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>,<br />
it turns out that this is not the case, one or other of the other expl<strong>an</strong>ations<br />
(or both) must hold.<br />
The trial designs used by breeders are not capable of yielding<br />
estimates of the genetic parameters that are required to test the first<br />
possibility because the material raised in them is neither r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>omized<br />
nor appropriately replicated. Perera et al. (1997) investigated the<br />
potential of a total of ten crosses between indica parents to yield<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive segreg<strong>an</strong>ts with respect to twelve qu<strong>an</strong>titative characters<br />
in three experiments that were designed with this purpose in mind. All<br />
of these parents, which between them included all three of the age<br />
classes of the crop, were of improved pl<strong>an</strong>t type with a relatively high<br />
yield potential. Seven of the crosses (crosses 1-7) were effectively taken<br />
at r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om from conventional <strong>breeding</strong> programs at the <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Development Institute at Batalagoda in Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka where these<br />
experiments were carried out; the remaining three (crosses 8 - 1 0 ) were<br />
made with the specific purpose of maximizing response to selection for<br />
yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other characters of interest. In each of these experiments, the<br />
families of the basic (P^, P 2 , Fj, F2 , Bj <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> B2 ) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> F3 generations of each<br />
cross were raised in completely r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>omized blocks <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>ts scored<br />
individually for each character.<br />
The results obtained from these experiments leave little doubt of the<br />
presence of considerable amount of additive genetical variation in each<br />
cross for each of the characters scored for the following reasons. First,<br />
the parents differed signific<strong>an</strong>tly for 63 out of a total of 105 combinations<br />
of crosses <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> characters; in addition, the FiS displayed signific<strong>an</strong>t<br />
better parent heterosis for 23 Of these combinations. Overall, 78 of these<br />
combinations (74%) indicated that the parents of these crosses differed
M,J. Lawrence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D. Senadhira 123<br />
genetically; this is the simplest <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> most direct evidence of ttie presence<br />
of heritable variation in these crosses.<br />
Second, vari<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>alysis of the F3 families of these crosses showed<br />
that with three exceptions only, all characters were heritable. However,<br />
the me<strong>an</strong> scores of the parents differed signific<strong>an</strong>tly for two of these<br />
exceptional characters <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Fj displayed signific<strong>an</strong>t better parent<br />
heterosis for the third. Taken as a whole, therefore, these results leave<br />
little doubt that all characters in all crosses were heritable. Estimates of<br />
their heritability (Table 7.1) showed that nearly one-third were 50% or<br />
greater <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that less th<strong>an</strong> one-fifth were below 2 0 %.<br />
Table 7,1<br />
Estimâtes of the heritability (7o) of characters obtained from the<br />
vari<strong>an</strong>ce components of vari<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>alysis of F3 families<br />
Cross TN DH I n* CL PL NPP PW GW' NGP GY NEP NSP<br />
1 25 46 ■23 48 55 48 45 23 39 - -<br />
2 6 8 63 48 36 33 24 54 31 1 0 0 - -<br />
3 28 50 1 0 0 (5) 90 54 63 30 1 0 0 _ - -<br />
4 17 6 8 30 25 31 2 0 31 16 76 - - -<br />
5 64 6 8 39 56 64 75 81 43 1 0 0 “ - -<br />
6 15 63 50 37 21 38 47 92 32 16 63 42<br />
7 (2 ) 82 44 34 19 5 17 61 19 11 36 32<br />
8 11 93 70 40 9 (2 ) 15 30 1 2 31 28 1 2<br />
9 67 46 29 46 21 59 29 58 42 44 29 35<br />
10 11 63 67 96 31 21 28 60 6 43 24 9<br />
Note: LOb2029xBg34-6(3-^ months);2,Bg380-2xBg34-6(3-L months);82-662 x 82-618(4<br />
4 months); 4, Bg380-2 x 82^662 {4-4-j- months); 5,82-1799xIR50 (3 months); 6, Bg850<br />
X1R50 (3 y months); 88-5328 x Ob2552 (4-4^ months); 8,Bg34-8 x IR58 (3 months); 9,<br />
Bg94-1 X IR62 (3-1-months); <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 10, Bg90-2 x IR72 (4 -4 ^ months). Key to the<br />
characters scored TN = tiller number, DH = days to heading, HT = height, CL = culm<br />
length, PL = p<strong>an</strong>icle length, NPP = number of p<strong>an</strong>icles per pl<strong>an</strong>t, PW = p<strong>an</strong>icle weight,<br />
GW = thous<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grain weight, NGP = number of grains per p<strong>an</strong>icle, NEP = number of<br />
empty spikelets per p<strong>an</strong>icle <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> NSP = number of spikelets per p<strong>an</strong>icle. The F3 families<br />
of Crosses 1-5 were raised in one trial, those of 6 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 7 in a second <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> those of Crosses<br />
8-10 in a third. The entries in parentheses indicate characters for which although there<br />
was no evidence of heritable variation from vari<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>alysis of P3 families, were<br />
clearly heritable on other evidence (see text). Parents of crosses with age class in parentheses:<br />
l,Ob2029X<br />
Third, predictions of the proportion of recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines that<br />
c<strong>an</strong> be extracted by single seed descent from these crosses, whose me<strong>an</strong>s<br />
are equal to or greater th<strong>an</strong> that of the better parent (or that of the Fj<br />
where this shows signific<strong>an</strong>t better parent heterosis), showed that it<br />
should be possible to obtain one or more such lines for most characters if<br />
100 were produced from each cross. To be 99% certain pf obtaining one f:
124 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
or more lines that achieved the desired targets for a minority of<br />
characters, however, these predictions indicated that it might be<br />
necessary to raise as m<strong>an</strong>y as 500 such lines by single seed descent. Only<br />
four of these predictions suggested that there was no prospect of<br />
achieving the desired targets for the characters concerned. These crosses<br />
were, therefore, clearly capable of yielding superior tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive<br />
segreg<strong>an</strong>ts for the great majority of characters.<br />
Fourth, the proportions of F3 families of crosses 8 , 9, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 10 whose<br />
me<strong>an</strong>s achieved the desired targets for characters of interest were<br />
broadly consistent (though, as expected, on average a little lower) with<br />
the corresponding proportions of recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines expected to<br />
achieve these targets (Table 7.2). If the me<strong>an</strong>s of F3 families display<br />
useful tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive variation, those of their F descend<strong>an</strong>ts are virtually<br />
certain to do so.<br />
Table 7 .2<br />
The predicted proportion (P) of recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines that c<strong>an</strong> be<br />
extracted from Crosses 8-10 by single-seed descent whose me<strong>an</strong>s are<br />
expected to equal or exceed the indicated targets <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the proportion<br />
of F3 families {Pf} whose me<strong>an</strong>s achieved these targets.<br />
K Cross Statistic PL NPF PW GW NGP GY NEP NSP<br />
i 8 Target ¿26.0 ^ 35.8 >3.8 >26.7 > 130.6 >94.7 35,8 >4.0 >26.5 ¿ 132.8 ¿ 93.8 S30.6 ¿ 167.5<br />
1 , ; P 12% 25% 5% 11% 34% 31% 26% 42%<br />
1 i' 15% 15% 8% 5% 33% 28% 23% 35%<br />
i . 10 Target >29.2 >33.2 >5.1 ¿29.4 ¿ 174.9 ¿ 136.0 ^21.9 > 2 1 1 .2<br />
■i !■ M P 30% 31% 4% 10% 5% 18% 2% 15%<br />
y<br />
2<br />
^ _____<br />
1% 32% 5% 5% 1 1% 8% 0% 13%<br />
Note: Targets were taken as the me<strong>an</strong>s of the higher scoring parent or that of the Fj, when this<br />
was greater, except for NEP where the target was the me<strong>an</strong> of the lower scoring parent or<br />
that of the Fj when this was lower.<br />
Fifth, these crosses had considerable potential for yield. The<br />
predicted yields in tons per hectare of the parents <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> F^s of crosses 8 ,9 ,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 1 0 , together with those of their highest scoring F3 family <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
predicted yield of the best 1 % of the recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines that c<strong>an</strong> be<br />
extracted by single seed descent from these crosses, are shown in Table<br />
7.3. The entries in this Table leave little doubt that it should be possible<br />
to extract recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines from each of these crosses whose<br />
perform<strong>an</strong>ce is appreciably better th<strong>an</strong> that of their F^. The predictions<br />
for Cross 10 are of special interest because it is of the same age class (4-<br />
4 y months) as the crosses in IRRI's new pl<strong>an</strong>t type program. We note<br />
that the predicted yield of the best F3 family is, at 9.65 t ha'^ only just<br />
short of the assumed yield barrier of 1 0 t ha"^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, in particular, that of
M J. Lawrence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D. Senadhira 125<br />
the top 1% of recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines is at 11.37 t ha'^ comfortable<br />
greater th<strong>an</strong> this barrier.<br />
Table 7.3<br />
Predicted yields (t ha‘^) of the parents of Crosses 8-10 (Bg <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR),<br />
their Fj, their highest scoring F3 family <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> those of the top 1% of<br />
the recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines (RlLs) that could be extracted from<br />
them.<br />
Family Cross 8 Cross 9 Cross 10<br />
Bg 5.16 5.30 8.31<br />
IR 4.76 4.94 6.89<br />
Fi 5.92 5.86 8.50<br />
Best F3 6.27 6.79 9.65<br />
Topl%ofRILs 6.61 8.10 11.37<br />
The results of this investigation are inconsistent with the notion that<br />
there is a shortage of exploitable genetical variation for yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other<br />
qu<strong>an</strong>titative characters among modern indica cultivars <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, in<br />
particular, are not consistent with the belief that the crop has reached a<br />
yield potential barrier of 10 t ha'^. The possibility that the crop has a<br />
narrow genetic base c<strong>an</strong>, therefore, be discounted; it follows that the<br />
inability of breeders to breach this barrier must have some other cause.<br />
Investigating the Second Possibility<br />
Conventional <strong>breeding</strong> methods involve selection in the early<br />
generations of crosses. In the case of the widely used pedigree method,<br />
selection is carried out in every generation, whereas with the bulk<br />
method, this is usually not initiated before the F5 generation. The<br />
modified pedigree method is intermediate in this respect, weak negative<br />
selection (perhaps better described as culling) being carried out on bulk<br />
populations of the P2 F3 generations of crosses, before selection of a<br />
similar type to that employed with the pedigree method is practiced in<br />
the F4 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fg generations. The selection practiced for characters such as<br />
height <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> days to maturity is of the stabilizing type, with the aim of<br />
choosing individuals that have a similar phenotype to that of<br />
recommended varieties that are included in trials for this purpose.<br />
Selection for pl<strong>an</strong>ts with large p<strong>an</strong>icles bearing a large number of<br />
spikelets, on the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, is directional. All of this selection is visual<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> therefore indirect; yield, for example, is not usually measured<br />
directly much before the F^ generations of pedigrees when individuals<br />
are more or less homozygous.<br />
Now, if this early generation selection is effective, the recombin<strong>an</strong>t<br />
inbred lines produced by these methods are expected to be better th<strong>an</strong><br />
those produced by single-seed descent (SSD), in which no selection is<br />
practiced during the course of in<strong>breeding</strong>. The SSD method, therefore,
126 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
c<strong>an</strong> be used as a control against which the efficiency of conventional<br />
methods c<strong>an</strong> be assessed. Fahim et al. (1997) compared the pedigree,<br />
modified pedigree <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bulk methods with SSD in terms of their relative<br />
efficiency in exploiting heritable variation for yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other<br />
qu<strong>an</strong>titative characters in Crosses 6 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 7. The number of Fg families<br />
produced by each of these methods in each cross is shown in Table 7.4.<br />
The me<strong>an</strong>s of the families produced by the conventional methods were,<br />
on average, greater in both crosses th<strong>an</strong> those produced by SSD for<br />
m<strong>an</strong>y of the characters, including grain yield, for which greater<br />
expression was desired. However, though without exception the best<br />
families produced by each of these methods achieved the desired target<br />
for every character considered on its own, none were signific<strong>an</strong>tly better<br />
th<strong>an</strong> the best family produced by SSD (Table 7.5). The chief effect of the<br />
selection carried out with the conventional methods was, therefore, to<br />
cull pl<strong>an</strong>ts of poor perform<strong>an</strong>ce (negative selection) rather th<strong>an</strong> to select<br />
those of superior perform<strong>an</strong>ce (positive selection).<br />
Table 7.4 The number of<br />
families produced by the four <strong>breeding</strong> methods in each cross<br />
Method Cross 6 Cross 7<br />
Pedigree (P)<br />
Modified pedigree (MP)<br />
6 uIk(B)<br />
Single-seed descent (SSD)<br />
51<br />
14<br />
25<br />
100<br />
22<br />
12<br />
30<br />
100<br />
Total 190 164<br />
Table 7.5<br />
Me<strong>an</strong> Scores of the best Fg families produced by each method for<br />
each character for which improvement was desired from each cross<br />
Cross PL NPP GY GW PW NGP NEP NSP<br />
Target ä25.9 a 27.2 >87.2 >23.8 a 4.45 a 175.8
M.J. Lawrence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D. Senadhira 127<br />
each cross. If this comparison was confined to. the costs incurred from<br />
the p2 to the Fs of these pedigrees, SSD would be much less costly th<strong>an</strong><br />
the other methods because with SSD, generations were adv<strong>an</strong>ced in the<br />
nursery, rather th<strong>an</strong> in the field. The audit of these costs also did not<br />
include the salary of the pl<strong>an</strong>t breeder who carried out selection in the<br />
conventional methods. Again, for convenience, the pedigrees of these<br />
crosses were adv<strong>an</strong>ced synchronously at the rate of two generations per<br />
<strong>an</strong>num with all four methods; in practice, it should be possible to raise<br />
three or more generations per <strong>an</strong>num with SSD, giving it a further<br />
adv<strong>an</strong>tage over conventional methods. Lastly, it c<strong>an</strong> be argued that this<br />
comparison is biased against SSD because whereas several thous<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts were raised in each generation with the conventional methods,<br />
only 100 lineages were adv<strong>an</strong>ced to the Fg generation with SSD; if, say,<br />
500 such lines were raised in the trial, it is likely that the best would<br />
have signific<strong>an</strong>tly outperformed the best lines produced by the other<br />
methods.<br />
Despite these difficulties, the results of this comparison leave little<br />
doubt that SSD was at least as effective as conventional methods in<br />
exploiting the heritable variation in these crosses. Though, as far as we<br />
are aware, this is the first such investigation with rice, a number of other<br />
investigation into the efficiency of early generation selection have been<br />
carried out. Among these are those of Empig <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fehr (1971), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Boerma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cooper (1975) with soybe<strong>an</strong>; Casali <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tigchelaar (1975 a)<br />
with tomato; Kaufm<strong>an</strong>n (1971) with oats; Park et al. (1976) with barley;<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Knott <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kumar (1975), Tee <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Qualset (1975) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Oeveren (1992)<br />
with wheat. Casali <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tigchelaar (1975b), Cornish (1990a, b) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Oeveren <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Stam (1992) have also investigated this question by<br />
computer simulation. Though the methods <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> designs used in these<br />
previous investigations differ in some import<strong>an</strong>t details from those<br />
employed by Fahim et al. (1997), there is general agreement that, in<br />
terms of the production of the best lines, SSD is, at worst, only slightly<br />
less efficient th<strong>an</strong> other methods, is frequently superior, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is<br />
potentially more rapid <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cost effective th<strong>an</strong> the latter.<br />
The conclusion that emerges from this investigation of the second<br />
possibility is obvious, namely, that the inability of breeders to breach the<br />
1 0 t ha"^ yield barrier with indica cultivars is almost certainly due in<br />
part, at least, to the use of inefficient <strong>breeding</strong> procedures. If, therefore,<br />
the attempt to practice selection in the early generations of pedigrees<br />
were to be ab<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>oned, a larger number of recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines<br />
could be produced by SSD, for a given expenditure of effort, th<strong>an</strong> with<br />
present methods, wtuch would increase the probability of extracting<br />
superior tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive segreg<strong>an</strong>ts from crosses.
123 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Investigating the Third Possibility<br />
It is not possible^ as pointed out earlier, to carry out more th<strong>an</strong> rather<br />
weak selection on the components of <strong>an</strong> aggregate phenotype unless the<br />
number of such comppnents is small (or the population of individuals<br />
that are c<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>idates for selection is very large), if the proportion of<br />
individuals ultimately selected is to be held at a reasonable level. In the<br />
simple, three-component example used to illustrate this point, it was<br />
assumed that the components were uncorrelated; this is, of course, very<br />
unlikely in practice. Suppose that the desired gain for each of these<br />
components is in the increasing direction. Then, if these components are<br />
positively correlated, the response to selection on the aggregate<br />
phenotype will be better th<strong>an</strong> what our calculation indicated. If on the<br />
other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, one of the components is negatively correlated with the<br />
others, the response expected will be less th<strong>an</strong> if they were imcorrelated.<br />
The sign <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> .magnitude of these correlations, therefore, determines the<br />
overall response to selection on the aggregate phenotype.<br />
Though selection has to be made with respect to the phenotypes of<br />
individuals, it is the genetic correlation between components that<br />
influences the. magnitude of this response. There are two causes of<br />
genetic correlation—pleiotropy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> linkage disequilibrium (Falconer<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mackay, 1996). When the same set of genes determines two<br />
characters, they are likely to be pleiotropically correlated; we expect<br />
tiller <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> p<strong>an</strong>icle number, for example, to be pleiotropically related.<br />
Both Falconer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mackay (1996) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Simmonds (1979) state that<br />
pleiotropy is the chief cause of genetic correlation, because in<br />
populations of individuals that mate at r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om, linkage disequilibrium,<br />
especially if the loci concerned are not linked in their inherit<strong>an</strong>ce, is<br />
expected to decay quite quickly over generations. There are good<br />
reasons, however, for expecting linkage disequilibrium to be <strong>an</strong><br />
import<strong>an</strong>t cause of genetic correlation between characters in the crosses<br />
h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>led by breeders of self-pollinating crop pl<strong>an</strong>t species. Thus, <strong>an</strong>y<br />
cross between a pair of homozygous parents is bound to generate<br />
linkage disequilibrium with respect to loci for which they differ.<br />
Suppose that the genotype of one parent with respect to a pair of loci is<br />
A"'' <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that of the other parent is A'*^A^B’*'B‘*'. Then, initially, the<br />
only gametes present are (those of the first parent) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
(those of the second parent). In the next generation, however, the<br />
missing pair of gametes, A'’B‘^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> A"^B^ are generated as a result of<br />
recombination <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> segregation at meiosis in the Fj double heterozygote,<br />
A'^'B^/A^B’*'. If the loci are not linked, the frequencies of the four-gamete<br />
types (haplotypes) are expected to be equal <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> linkage equilibrium will<br />
have been restored in a single generation. If, on the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, the loci
M J. Lawrence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D. Senadhira 129<br />
are linked in their inherit<strong>an</strong>ce, the frequencies of the parental gamete<br />
types will be higher th<strong>an</strong> those of the recombin<strong>an</strong>t types by <strong>an</strong> amount<br />
depending on how closely they are linked. Furthermore, this linkage<br />
disequilibrium of genes that are linked in their inherit<strong>an</strong>ce will decay<br />
much more slowly over the generations of the selfing series th<strong>an</strong> under<br />
r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om mating because, since the frequency of heterozygotes halves<br />
with each generation of the former, opportunities for recombination<br />
become increasingly less common. We have gone into this import<strong>an</strong>t<br />
matter in some detail because it appears to have been rarely considered<br />
in the literature.<br />
Now, if the genetic correlation between a pair of characters is,<br />
allowing for some sampling variation, more or less const<strong>an</strong>t in<br />
magnitude <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sign over crosses, it is likely that the chief cause of this<br />
correlation is pleiotropy. But if, on the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, thé chief cause of<br />
genetic correlation is the linkage disequilibrium of genes that are linked<br />
in their inherit<strong>an</strong>ce, the magnitude <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sign of the correlation would be<br />
expected to vary over crosses, so that, in principle, breeders could select<br />
those crosses in which the genetic correlations between characters of<br />
interest were most favourable to their objectives. Sriyoheswar<strong>an</strong> (1995)<br />
obtained estimates of the genetic correlations between the characters<br />
scored in Crosses 8-10 from the components of the me<strong>an</strong> products of the<br />
<strong>an</strong>alysis of covari<strong>an</strong>ce of the data from the F3 families of these crosses.<br />
Bearing in mind that the proportion of variation of one character caused<br />
by its relationship with <strong>an</strong>other is the square of the correlation between<br />
them, attention may be confined to those pairs of characters for which<br />
the absolute value of the estimate is equal to or greater th<strong>an</strong> 0.5. Figure<br />
7.1 shows the genetic correlations between characters in these crosses<br />
which meet this criterion, the great majority of which were signific<strong>an</strong>tly<br />
different from zero. The correlations between five pairs of characters<br />
(TN <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> NPP; PW <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> NGP; NSP <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> H, PW <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> NEP) are consistent<br />
over crosses in terms of their sign <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> relative magnitude; in addition, a<br />
sixth pair (NEP <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> NSP) only just fails to fall into this category, the<br />
correlation between these characters in Cross 8 being 0.48. The cause of<br />
the genetic correlations between these characters (most of which are, of<br />
course, expected) c<strong>an</strong>, therefore, be attributed to pleiotropy. Apart from<br />
these, the most striking feature of the correlations shown in Figure 7.1 is<br />
the extent to which they vary over crosses. While it is not possible to<br />
definitely njle out the possibility that the genetic correlations between<br />
these characters is due to pleiotropy, because different genes will have<br />
segregated in these crosses (see Falconer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mackay, 1996 on this<br />
point), the most reasonable interpretation of this variation over crosses<br />
is that the chief cause of genetic correlation between these draracters is<br />
the linkage disequilibrium of genes that are linked in their inherit<strong>an</strong>ce.
m<br />
M J. Lawrence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D. Senadhira 131<br />
It is worth pointing out that this variation in, the magnitude <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, in<br />
one case (GY <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> NSP), also of sign, is not a consequence of the decision<br />
to consider only those correlations whose absolute magnitude is equal to<br />
or greater th<strong>an</strong> 0.5, since the great majority of estimates not included in<br />
the Figure are well below this value <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hence are not signific<strong>an</strong>tly<br />
different from zero. For example, while the correlation between GY <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
TN was 0.95 in Cross 9 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 0.70 in Cross 10, it was only 0,11 in Cross 8 .<br />
Again, while GY was highly <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> positively correlated to H in Cross 10<br />
(0,77), there was little evidence that these characters were correlated in<br />
Cross 8 or 9 for which the estimates were only 0.05 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 0.22,<br />
respectively. Indeed, for GY <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> PW, while the correlation between<br />
these characters was 0.70 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 0.75 in Crosses 8 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 10 respectively, it<br />
was - 0.45 in Cross 9, <strong>an</strong> estimate which was just signific<strong>an</strong>tly different<br />
from zero; this is one of the very few cases where truncation may have<br />
concealed a relationship of potential interest.<br />
This variation between crosses with respect to the magnitude <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
sign of the genetic correlations between characters has been routinely<br />
observed in other rice crosses of the indica type (see Perera, 1985 for<br />
Crosses 1-5), in a pair of new pl<strong>an</strong>t type crosses (Bentota et ahf 1997),<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> also in five spring barley crosses (Thomas <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tapsell, 1985). The<br />
ubiquity of this variation strongly supports the conclusion that the chief<br />
cause of genetic correlation between characters in pedigrees founded by<br />
crosses between pairs of inbred lines is the linkage disequilibrium<br />
between the genes that determine these characters that are linked in<br />
their inherit<strong>an</strong>ce. This, in turn, suggests that breeders might be able to<br />
select crosses not ordy in terms of their capacity to yield superior<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive segreg<strong>an</strong>ts with respect to single characters of interest, but<br />
also those in which the genetic correlations between characters are<br />
potentially favorable to the breeders objectives. Crosses which fulfill the<br />
first of these requirements in which, in addition, characters for which<br />
greater expression is desired are subst<strong>an</strong>tially <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> positively correlated,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the correlations between this group of characters <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> those, such as<br />
days to maturity, which breeders wish to maintain within <strong>an</strong> interval,<br />
are zero or small, are of greater interest th<strong>an</strong> crosses in which these<br />
additional requirements are not met.<br />
A BIOMETRICAL BREEDING PROCEDURE<br />
Perera et al. (1997) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fahim et al. (1997) carried out investigations for<br />
the specific purpose of identifying the cause of the inability of breeders<br />
to breach <strong>an</strong> assumed yield potential barrier of 1 0 t ha"* with indica<br />
cultivars bred for use in the lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tropics. They showed that there is
132 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
no evidence of a shortage of exploitable genetical variation for yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
other characters of interest in such cultivars <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that the chief cause of<br />
the failure to make progress with yield is almost certainly the use of<br />
inefficient <strong>breeding</strong> procedures coupled with the well-known difficulty<br />
of making progress with multitrait selection. These results; however,<br />
have broader implications, because the procedures used indicate how<br />
present <strong>breeding</strong> methods could be modified to make them more<br />
efficient.<br />
We have proposed elsewhere (Lawrence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senadhira 1997) a<br />
biometrical procedure which involves selection carried out at the Fj, F3 ,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fg generations of pedigrees founded on single crosses between<br />
inbred parents, the first two stages involving selection between<br />
pedigrees <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the third, selection within pedigrees that survive the first<br />
two stages of scrutiny. The purpose of the first stage is to identify<br />
crosses whose Fi progeny display better-parent heterosis for yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
other characters for which improvement is desired because, in the<br />
absence of overdomin<strong>an</strong>ce (for which it is now agreed there is very little<br />
evidence; see Jinks, 1983), heterosis c<strong>an</strong> occur only when the increasing<br />
genes for which the parents differ are at least partially dispersed<br />
between them. But such crosses are those most capable of displaying<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive variation in later generations; heterosis serves as a me<strong>an</strong>s<br />
of recognizing these crosses. A trial which includes the parents <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
Fj^s of a number of crosses would allow breeders to identify those which<br />
are most promising in this respect <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to discard the rest.<br />
The purpose of the P3 trial is to provide <strong>an</strong>swers to four import<strong>an</strong>t<br />
questions about crosses. First, are all characters of interest heritable?<br />
Second, is the cross predicted to yield a reasonable proportion of<br />
superior recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines for such characters?<br />
Third, do the me<strong>an</strong>s of F3 families display useful tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive<br />
variation? Fourth, is the pattern of genetic correlations between<br />
characters favorable to the objectives of the program in improving all<br />
components of the desired aggregate phenotype? If the <strong>an</strong>swer to <strong>an</strong>y of<br />
these questions is no, breeders would need to consider whether it was<br />
worthwhile adv<strong>an</strong>cing the pedigree further.<br />
Any cross which survives the first two stages of this objective <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
systematic procedure is likely to produce superior recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred<br />
lines for each of a number of characters considered singly, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> also<br />
simult<strong>an</strong>eously for some if not all, of all the characters for which<br />
improvement is desired. The purpose of the third <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> final, F^ stage is to<br />
identify such lines that are extracted from crosses by single-seed descent.<br />
For reasons given earlier, there is little point in attempting to carry out<br />
selection for qu<strong>an</strong>titative characters during the course of in<strong>breeding</strong>; it<br />
is better to defer selection within pedigrees until such time that
M J. Lawrence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D. Senadhira 133<br />
individuals are^.more or less homozygous <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to redirect effort <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
resources to maximizing the number of recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines<br />
produced from each cross.<br />
It must be emphasized that the trials at each of the three stages of<br />
this new procedure are capable of providing objective <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> unbiased<br />
information on the genetical variation segregating in crosses, if, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
only if, the entries in them are appropriately replicated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rar^domized,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>ts are scored by measuring them directly for characters of<br />
interest. Since none of these crucial requirements are fulfilled at <strong>an</strong>y of<br />
the early stages in conventional <strong>breeding</strong> programs, the implementation<br />
of this new <strong>breeding</strong> strategy would, of course, involve a considerable<br />
departure from current practice. - .<br />
THE RELIABILITY OF PREDICTIONS<br />
Prediction of the proportion of recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines that c<strong>an</strong> be<br />
extracted from a cross by single-seed descent, whose me<strong>an</strong>s equal or<br />
exceed <strong>an</strong>y desired st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard, involves estimation of the me<strong>an</strong>, m <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
vari<strong>an</strong>ce, D (or, in the alternative notation, 2VA*; see Kearsey <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pooni<br />
1996) of the distribution of these lines from the early generations of the<br />
pedigree (Jinks <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pooni, 1976). Calculation of the one-tailed normal<br />
deviate, using these estimates then allows one to determine this<br />
proportion from st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard statistical tables. Estimates of these<br />
parameters c<strong>an</strong> be obtained from a variety of sources (Jinks <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pooni<br />
1980). Perera et al. (1997) chose to derive these estimates from P3 families<br />
on the grounds that families of this generation have to be raised in order<br />
to adv<strong>an</strong>ce pedigrees, whereas those of triple test crosses (Kearsey <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Jinks, 1968), for example, do not. How reliable are these predictions?<br />
Table 7.6 shows the predicted <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> actual proportions of recombin<strong>an</strong>t<br />
inbred lines extracted by SSD from Crosses 6 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 7 whose<br />
perform<strong>an</strong>ce achieves the target for each of the characters for which<br />
improvement was desired (Fahim et ah, 1997). It is evident that there is<br />
reasonable agreement between the predicted <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> observed proportions<br />
over characters. But the families in this case were raised in the same<br />
trial as the F3 families from which estimates of m <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D were obtained.<br />
In practice, of course <strong>an</strong> Fg trial is likely to be held at least one year after<br />
the corresponding F 3 trial; that is, these trials will be carried out in<br />
different environments. Any difference between these environments<br />
which has the effect of simply adding or subtracting a more or less<br />
const<strong>an</strong>t amount to the scores of individuals should be easily detected<br />
from a. comparison of the gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> me<strong>an</strong>s of the two trials (i.e. P3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> F 5 )<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> accommodated, when the scores of the parents of the cross have
134 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
been used to define the targets for improvement by including tihem in<br />
the Fg trial. A similar argument holds for that type of genotypeenvironment<br />
interaction which exp<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s or contracts the observed<br />
vari<strong>an</strong>ce of the distribution of recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines about their<br />
me<strong>an</strong> relative to the estimate of this vari<strong>an</strong>ce obtained from F3 families,<br />
because the r<strong>an</strong>k order of genotypes, allowing for some sampling<br />
variation, is not expected to ch<strong>an</strong>ge much in these circumst<strong>an</strong>ces.<br />
Potentially the most serious form of genotype-environment interaction<br />
is that which ch<strong>an</strong>ges the r<strong>an</strong>k order of genotypes over environments<br />
(often referred to as crossover interaction). There are two reasons,<br />
however, for believing that this type of interaction is unlikely to cause a<br />
serious loss of reliability of the prediction of the proportion of superior<br />
lines that c<strong>an</strong> be extracted from a cross. First, while there is no doubt<br />
that genotype-environment interaction of this type occurs in rice, as in<br />
other crops, nearly all of the relev<strong>an</strong>t evidence appears to come from<br />
multilocational trials. Breeders, on the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, will almost certainly<br />
carry out trials in the same location as the F3 trials; differences<br />
between environments in the same location are expected to be smaller<br />
th<strong>an</strong> those between the environments of different locations, especially<br />
for irrigated crops. Second, the genotypes most vulnerable to ch<strong>an</strong>ges in<br />
their r<strong>an</strong>k order are those that determine intermediate phenot3^es;<br />
extreme lines, those that fall into the tails of the distribution, are less<br />
likely to suffer these ch<strong>an</strong>ges. In consequence, neither the me<strong>an</strong>, nor the<br />
vari<strong>an</strong>ce of the distribution of recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines with respect to a<br />
qu<strong>an</strong>titative character is expected to be much affected by genotypeenvironment<br />
interaction of this type. In general, therefore, genotypeenvironment<br />
interaction is not expected to markedly affect the accuracy<br />
of single character predictions of the proportion of superior inbred lines<br />
that c<strong>an</strong> be extracted from a cross; there is now a considerable body of<br />
empirical evidence that supports this conclusion.<br />
Table 7.6<br />
Predicted <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> actual proportions (%) of the recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines<br />
extracted from Crosses 6 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 7 whose perform<strong>an</strong>ce achieved the<br />
target for each of the characters for which improvement was desired.<br />
Cross Proportion PL NPP GY GW PW NGP NEP NSP<br />
6 Predicted 53% 61% 29% 27% 3% 3% 32% 8 %<br />
Actual 38% 37% 25%= 45% 7% 6 % 31% 9%<br />
7 Predicted 6 6 % 40% 16% 83% 35% 1 1 % 40% 23%<br />
Actual 58% 2 2 % 9% 80% 35% 15% 47% 19%<br />
Note: The Targets were the me<strong>an</strong>s of the better parent of each cross for the character<br />
concerned.<br />
This conclusion is not expected to hold, however, when a major gene<br />
for, say, disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce is segregating in a cross. Clearly, when the
M.J, Lawrence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D. Senadhira 135<br />
incidence of the disease in question is negligible in the F 3 trial but<br />
appreciable in the trial, genotypes which determine high-yielding<br />
phenotypes in the former are not expected to do so in the latter if they<br />
are susceptible to this disease. If resist<strong>an</strong>ce is recessive, it would be<br />
possible to screen the individuals of the F2 generation of the cross,<br />
provided that both the expressivity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the penetr<strong>an</strong>ce of the gene is<br />
complete, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the screening procedure used allows no escapes. If these<br />
conditions c<strong>an</strong> be met, then single-seed descent could be initiated from<br />
the sub-set of F2 individuals that are resist<strong>an</strong>t to the disease. Because<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce is usually domin<strong>an</strong>t, however, it would be necessary to carry<br />
out a preliminary screen at F2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a final screen at F^ on a subset of<br />
seedlings immediately prior to the third stage trial, in order to identify<br />
recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines that homozygous for resist<strong>an</strong>ce (see Lawrence<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senadhira, 1998 for details). In all other circumst<strong>an</strong>ces, selection<br />
within pedigrees should be delayed until the F^ generation.<br />
SELECTING FOR STABILITY OF PERFORMANCE<br />
The ideal variety is one that performs well in the full r<strong>an</strong>ge of<br />
environments in which it c<strong>an</strong> reasonably be grown; that is, it displays<br />
little genotype-environment interaction over these environments so its<br />
perform<strong>an</strong>ce is stable. There are two points worth making about stability<br />
of perform<strong>an</strong>ce. First, experiments with Nicoti<strong>an</strong>a rusUca have shown<br />
that it is possible to successfully select for all four combinations of the<br />
extremes of me<strong>an</strong> perform<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> environmental sensitivity so as to<br />
obtain recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines that are high-high, high-low, low-high<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> low-low for these characters respectively (Brunmpton et al, 1977;<br />
Jinks et al, 1977, Boughey <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jinks, 1978; Boughey et al, 1978; Jinks <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Pooni, 1987). This indicates that although these characters are often<br />
positively correlated before selection, they must be, at least partially,<br />
controlled by different sets of genes. There is, of course, no reason for<br />
supposing that this is not true of other species also. This suggests that it<br />
might be desirable to carry out Fg trials in a limited number of locations<br />
that represent the r<strong>an</strong>ge of environments in which the crop c<strong>an</strong> be<br />
reasonably grown, rather th<strong>an</strong> a single location as with current practice.<br />
If this could be done it would be possible to identify recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred<br />
lines that have a high <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stable yield much earlier th<strong>an</strong> at present.<br />
Gravois et al (1990), using Shukla's (1972) stability statistics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> K<strong>an</strong>g's<br />
(1988) r<strong>an</strong>k sum method, have shown how high-yielding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stable<br />
genotypes c<strong>an</strong> be identified in rice.<br />
Second, the environments used by breeders to evaluate crosses are<br />
irearly always considerably better th<strong>an</strong> those in which farmers raise<br />
their crops; on these grounds alone, a case c<strong>an</strong> be made for carrying out
136 ’ <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
selection in the kind of environment for which a variety is bred^ rather<br />
th<strong>an</strong> those of <strong>breeding</strong> stations. There is <strong>an</strong> additional reason for<br />
carrying out selection in a poor environment. Thus, <strong>an</strong> experiment with<br />
the fungus, Schizophyllum commune, in which selection was practiced for<br />
both high <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> low growth rate at each of two different temperatures,<br />
20° C <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 30 °C, over several generations showed that, although they had<br />
a virtually identical average growth rate, the high line selected at 20°C<br />
(the poor environment) had a lower vari<strong>an</strong>ce over temperatures th<strong>an</strong> the<br />
high line selected at 30°C (Jinks <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Connolly, 1973). In addition to<br />
displaying a greater stability, the me<strong>an</strong> growth rate of the high line<br />
selected in the poor environment when raised at 30°C was not much less<br />
th<strong>an</strong> that of the high line selected at this temperature. Again, there is, no<br />
reason for supposing that this outcome is peculiar to growth rate in<br />
Schizophytlum. Data from the International Network for Genetic Evaluation<br />
of <strong>Rice</strong> (INGER) could be used to establish that this relationship also<br />
holds for rice. That varieties bred at Batalagoda, <strong>an</strong> environment which<br />
for irrigated rice is not as good as that at Los Baños, have in general, a<br />
wider adaptability th<strong>an</strong> those bred at IRRI suggests that this is likely to<br />
be the case.<br />
The practical implications of the results from these experiments<br />
with Schizophyllum <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nicoti<strong>an</strong>a are clear, namely, that the initial<br />
selection for high-yielding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stable genotypes in rice should be done<br />
in poor environments <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that subsequent testing of their stability<br />
should be carried out in thé r<strong>an</strong>ge of environments in which the crop is<br />
grown by farmers. The question of whether the initial selection should<br />
be carried out in farms or in poor environments simulated in <strong>breeding</strong><br />
stations is for those concerned to decide.<br />
!■:<br />
I<br />
HYBRID VARIETIES<br />
Discussion has been confined so far to <strong>breeding</strong> programs whose end<br />
products are recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines. Given the apparent success of<br />
hybrid varieties in China (Lin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yu<strong>an</strong>, 1980; Yu<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, 1988),<br />
a number of hybrid rice-<strong>breeding</strong> programs have been initiated<br />
elsewhere, including IRRI. Hybrid varieties are, of course, bred to<br />
exploit heterosis. There is no doubt that the Fj progeny of single crosses<br />
of rice frequently display better-parent heterosis for yield; each of the<br />
five crosses investigated by Perera et al. (1997) in which grain yield was<br />
recorded (Crosses 6 - 1 0 ), for example, displayed better-parent heterosis<br />
for this character. The <strong>breeding</strong> of hybrid varieties c<strong>an</strong> be justified on<br />
genetical grounds, however, if <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> only if, the genes for which the<br />
parents differ display overdomin<strong>an</strong>ce. If this is the case, no inbred line
M.J. Lawrence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D. Senadhira 137<br />
extracted from a cross is expected to match the perform<strong>an</strong>ce of the<br />
original Fj hybrid; that is, the cross is not expected to yield superior<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive segreg<strong>an</strong>ts. But as we saw earlier, the predicted yield of<br />
the best F3 family was greater th<strong>an</strong> that of the in each of Crosses 8-10<br />
shown in Table 7,3. Again, though only one of the best families of<br />
Cross 7 shown in Table 7.5 had <strong>an</strong> average yield that matched that of the<br />
Fi of this cross (108.6 g), all four such families exceeded the yield of the<br />
Pj in Cross 6 (98.3 g). This evidence of tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive segregation in these<br />
crosses indicates that the chief cause of the heterosis exhibited by their<br />
Fj progeny is the dispersion of genes that display incomplete domin<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
in the increasing direction between the parents. These results, therefore,<br />
which are, of course, similar to those obtained from a wide r<strong>an</strong>ge of crop<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t species (Jinks, 1983; Kearsey <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pooni, 1992), provide no genetical<br />
justification for the <strong>breeding</strong> of hybrid varieties in rice. The heterosis,<br />
which crosses frequently show, c<strong>an</strong> be more easily fixed in recombin<strong>an</strong>t<br />
inbred lines extracted from them, thus avoiding the difficulties <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
expense of having to breed male sterility into the female parent of<br />
hybrid varieties. As explained earlier, however, heterosis c<strong>an</strong> serve the<br />
very useful purpose of identifying those crosses in which the genes are<br />
dispersed between the parents <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hence those capable of yielding<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive segreg<strong>an</strong>ts in later generations of the pedigree. The chief<br />
justification for hybrid varieties is the commercial adv<strong>an</strong>tage to <strong>breeding</strong><br />
comp<strong>an</strong>ies of being able to protect the inbred parents of these varieties,<br />
so that farmers are obliged to purchase their seed from these comp<strong>an</strong>ies<br />
every year rather th<strong>an</strong> save seed from their own crops.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Adoption of the procedures discussed in this chapter should allow<br />
breeders to exploit the genetical variation for each character of interest<br />
in their crosses more efficiently <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> systematically th<strong>an</strong> hitherto. The<br />
problem of how best to improve the crop for all characters<br />
simult<strong>an</strong>eously, remains, however. As seen above, the empirical<br />
evidence indicates that the chief cause of the genetic correlation between<br />
the majority of characters is the linkage disequilibrium of genes that are<br />
linked in their inherit<strong>an</strong>ce, because the magnitude <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sometimes also<br />
the sign of these correlations, varies considerably over crosses. This<br />
suggests that it should, in principle, be possible to choose crosses at the<br />
F3 stage of pedigrees not only in terms of their potential to yield superior<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive segreg<strong>an</strong>ts with respect each character considered<br />
independently, but also those in which the pattern of genetic correlations<br />
are most favorable to the breeders objectives in effecting improvement<br />
for all characters simult<strong>an</strong>eously. Choosing crosses on this basis.
138 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
however, would be justifiable only if the estimates of genetic correlation<br />
obtained from the data of F3 families are sufficiently precise.<br />
The question of the precision of estimates of genetic correlation<br />
obtained frpm the generations of the selling series appears to have<br />
received little attention. Some insight into this problem c<strong>an</strong> be obtained,<br />
however, from the modification of formulae developed for use with<br />
data obtained from populations of individuals that mate at r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om<br />
(Falconer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mackay, 1996). Preliminary calculations showed that the<br />
st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard errors of estimates of genetic correlations between characters<br />
obtained from F3 data sets of the size that Sriyoheswar<strong>an</strong> (1995) was<br />
concerned with (40 families of size 10) c<strong>an</strong> be uncomfortably large<br />
unless the heritabilities of the characters are appreciable or the genetic<br />
correlation between them is large or, of course, both. This is <strong>an</strong><br />
additional reason for confining attention to estimates of genetic<br />
correlation whose absolute value is greater th<strong>an</strong> 0.5. It would be prudent,<br />
therefore, to disregard estimates when these conditions are not fulfilled.<br />
However, this is only a first <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> partial step towards abatement of<br />
this problem. What c<strong>an</strong> be done to improve efficiency when selection is<br />
carried out at the third, Fg stage of the biometrical <strong>breeding</strong> strategy? At<br />
present, most breeders appear to use what Simmonds (1979) has referred<br />
to as <strong>an</strong> ad hoc version of independent culling levels. In principle, the<br />
most efficient way of tackling the problem would be to Omploy some<br />
kind of index selection method, which has the great adv<strong>an</strong>tage of<br />
combining information from the components of aggregate phenotype in<br />
a systematic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> objective way. While the simplest index is weight free,<br />
most involve phenotypic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic vari<strong>an</strong>ces <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> covari<strong>an</strong>ces of<br />
characters <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the same take into accoimt the economic value of each<br />
component in the aggregate phenotype (see Baker, 1986 for a<br />
comprehensive account of these methods). Although the economic<br />
weights attached to components would presumably depend upon the<br />
objectives of a <strong>breeding</strong> program <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hence apply to all crosses in a<br />
program, the phenotypic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic vari<strong>an</strong>ces <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> covari<strong>an</strong>ces of<br />
characters are, for reasons given above, expected to vary over crosses.<br />
Thus, it would be necessary to compute <strong>an</strong>y index that uses this<br />
information for each cross separately. The use of <strong>an</strong> index of this kind,<br />
however, would be worthwhile only if the estimates of these statistics<br />
were sufficiently precise. Reassuringly, preliminary calculations of a<br />
similar type to those used with estimates obtained horn the F3 families<br />
show that estimates of genetic correlations between characters obtained<br />
from Fg trials involving 1 0 0 families of size ten are very much more<br />
precise th<strong>an</strong> the former. This must also be true of the estimates of genetic<br />
vari<strong>an</strong>ces <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> covari<strong>an</strong>ces on which these genetic correlations are based.<br />
Thus, although further work on this problem would be desirable, the
M.J. Lawrence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D. Senadhira 139<br />
foregoing suggests that it might be worthwhile using a selection index to<br />
identify those recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines extracted from a cross whose<br />
perform<strong>an</strong>ce comes closest to achieving the desired level for all<br />
characters of interest to the breeder simult<strong>an</strong>eously.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
We are indebted to our colleagues, Drs. M J. Kearsey <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> H.S. Pooni, for<br />
discussion <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> comment on m<strong>an</strong>y aspects of the work presented here,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to Professor RJ. Baker of the University of Saskatoon, C<strong>an</strong>ada, for<br />
help with the question of precision of estimates of genetic correlation.<br />
References<br />
Baker, R. 1986. Selection Indices in Pl<strong>an</strong>t Breeding. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.<br />
Bentota, A.P., Senadhira, D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Lawrence, M.J. 1997. Qu<strong>an</strong>titative <strong>genetics</strong> of rice, III. The<br />
potential of pair of new pl<strong>an</strong>t type crosses. Field Crops Res. (in press).<br />
Boerma, H.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cooper, R.L, 1975. Comparison of three selection procedures for yield in<br />
soybe<strong>an</strong>. Crop Sei, 15; 225-229.<br />
Boughey, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jinks, J.L. 1978. Joint selection for both extremes of me<strong>an</strong> perform<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
of sensitivity to a macro-environmental variable. III. The determin<strong>an</strong>ts of sensitivity.<br />
Heredity 40: 363-369.<br />
Boughey, H., Jinks, J.L., Coombs, D.T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shufflebotham, W. 1978. Joint selection for both<br />
extremes of me<strong>an</strong> perform<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> of sensitivity to a macro-environmental variable, IV.<br />
Growth pattern <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sensitivity. Heredity 41:175-183.<br />
Brumpton, R.J., Boughey, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jinks, J.L. 1977. Joint selection for both extremes of me<strong>an</strong><br />
perform<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> of sensivity to a macro-environmental variable, I. Family selection.<br />
Heredity 38: 219-226.<br />
Casali, V.W.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tigchelaar, E.C. 1975a. Breeding progress in tomato with pedigree<br />
selection <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> single seed descent, /, Amer. Soc. Hort. Sei. 100:362-364.<br />
Casali, V.W.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tigchelaar, E.C. 1975b. Computer simulation studies comparing<br />
pedigree, bulk <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> single seed descent selection in self pollinated crops. /. Amer. Soc.<br />
Hort. Sei. 100:364-367.<br />
Cassm<strong>an</strong>, K.G., De Datta, S.K., Oik, D.C., Alc<strong>an</strong>tara, J.A., Samson, M., Descalsota, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Dizon, M. 1994, Yield decline <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the nitrogen economy of long-term experiments on<br />
continuous, irrigated rice systems in the tropics. In: Experimental Basis of Sustainability <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Environmental Quality, R. Lai <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> B.A. Stewart (eds.). Lewis/CRC Publishers, Boca Raton,<br />
Florida, USA, pp, 181-222.<br />
Cornish, M.A. 1990a, Selection during a selling programme, I, The effects of a single round of<br />
selection. Heredity 65: 201-211.<br />
Cornish, M.A. 1990b. Selection during a selling programme, II. The effects of two or more<br />
rounds of selection Heredity, 65:213-220,<br />
Empig, L.T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fehr, W.R. 1971. Evaluation of methods for generation adv<strong>an</strong>ce in a bulk<br />
hybrid soybe<strong>an</strong> population. Crop Sei. 11:51-54.<br />
Fahim, M., Dh<strong>an</strong>apala, M.P., Senadhira, D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Lawrence, M.J. 1997. Qu<strong>an</strong>titative <strong>genetics</strong><br />
of rice, II. A comparison of the efficiency of four <strong>breeding</strong> methods. Field Crops Res. (in<br />
press).
140 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Falconer, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to Qu<strong>an</strong>titative Genetics, Longm<strong>an</strong>,<br />
Harlow, Essex, UK (4th ed.).<br />
FA O 1988. FAO World Crop <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Livestock.Statistics 1948-1955. FAO Quart. Bull. Statistics, vol.<br />
4, Rome.<br />
Flinn, J.C., De Datta, S.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Labad<strong>an</strong>, E. 1982. An <strong>an</strong>alysis of long-term rice yields in a<br />
wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soil. Field Crops Res., 5; 201-206.<br />
Gravois, K.A., Moldenhauer, K.A.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rohm<strong>an</strong>, P.C. 1990. Genotype-by-environment<br />
interaction for rice yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> identification of stable high-yielding genotypes. In: Genotype<br />
by Environment Interaction <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pl<strong>an</strong>t Breeding, M.S. K<strong>an</strong>g (ed.). Louisi<strong>an</strong>a State University,<br />
Baton Rouge, LA, USA, pp. 181-188.<br />
IRRI1989. IRRI Toward 2000 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Beyond. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines.<br />
IRRI1993. <strong>Rice</strong> Alm<strong>an</strong>ac 1993-1995. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines,<br />
Jinks, J.L. 1983. Biometrical <strong>genetics</strong> of heterosis. In: Heterosis, Monographs on Theoretical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Applied Genetics, R, Fr<strong>an</strong>kel (ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1-46.<br />
Jinks, J.L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Connolly, V. 1973. Selection for specific <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> general response to environmental<br />
differences. Heredity 30: 33-40.<br />
Jinks, J.L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pooni, H.S. 1976. Predicting the properties of recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines derived<br />
by single seed descent. Heredity 36:253-266.<br />
Jinks, J.L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pooni, H.S. 1980. Comparing predictions of me<strong>an</strong> perform<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
environmental sensitivity of recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines based upon F3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> triple test cross<br />
families. Heredity 45; 305-312.<br />
Jinks, J.L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pooni, H.S. 1987. The genetical basis of environmental sensitivity. In: Proc. 2nd.<br />
Inti. Conf. Qu<strong>an</strong>titative Genetics. B.S. Weireí al. (eds.), Raleigh, NC, USA.<br />
Jinks, J.L., Jayasekara, N.E.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Boughey, H, 1977. Joint selection for both extremes of<br />
me<strong>an</strong> perform<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> of sensitivity to a macro-environmental variable, II. Single seed<br />
descent. Heredity 39j 345-355,<br />
K<strong>an</strong>g, M.S. 1988. A r<strong>an</strong>k-sum method for selecting high-yielding, stable corn gentoypes.<br />
Cereal Res. Communi. 16:113-115.<br />
Kaufm<strong>an</strong>n, M.L. 1971. The r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om method of oat <strong>breeding</strong> for productivity. C<strong>an</strong>. J. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Sei.<br />
15:13-16.<br />
Kearsey, M.J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jinks, J.L. 1968. A general method of detecting additive, domin<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
epistatic variation for metrical traits, I. Theory. Heredity 23:403-409.<br />
Kearsey, M.J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pooni, H.S. 1992. The potential of inbred lines in the presence of heterosis.<br />
In: Reproductive Biology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pl<strong>an</strong>t Breeding. Y. Dattee, C. Dumas <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> A. Gallais (eds.).<br />
Springer-Verlag, London, UK, pp. 371-^385.<br />
Kearsey, M.J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pooni, H.S. 1996. The Genetical Analysis of Qu<strong>an</strong>titative Traits. Champm<strong>an</strong> &<br />
Hall, London, UK.<br />
Khush, G.S., Brar, D.S., Bermett, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. 1994. Apomixis for rice improvement. In:<br />
Apomixis: Exploiting Hybrid Vigor in <strong>Rice</strong>. G.S. Khush (ed.), IRRI Los Baños, Philippines,<br />
pp. 1- 2 1 .<br />
Knott, D.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kumar, J. 1975. Comparison of early generation yield testing <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> single seed<br />
descent procedure in wheat <strong>breeding</strong>. Crop Sei. 15:295-299.<br />
Kropff, M.J., Peng, S., Setter, T.L., Matthews, R.B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cassm<strong>an</strong>, K.G. 1994. Qu<strong>an</strong>titative<br />
underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing of rice yield potential. In: Breaking the Yield Barrier. K.G. Cassm<strong>an</strong> (ed.).<br />
Proc. Workshop on <strong>Rice</strong> Yield Potential in Favorable Environments. IRRI, Philippines, pp. 5-<br />
20.<br />
Lawrence, M.J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senadhira, D. 1997. Qu<strong>an</strong>titative <strong>genetics</strong> of rice, IV. A <strong>breeding</strong> strategy.<br />
Field Crops Res. (inpress).
M J. Lawrence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D. Senadhira 141<br />
Lawrence, M.J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senadhira, D. 1998. A biometrical <strong>breeding</strong> procedure. IRRI Discussion<br />
paper Series No.?? IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines (in press).<br />
Lin, S.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yu<strong>an</strong>, L.P. 1980. Hybrid rice <strong>breeding</strong> in China. In: Innovative Approaches to <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Breeding, IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines pp, 35-51.<br />
Oeveren, A.J. v<strong>an</strong> 1992. A comparison between single seed descent <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> early cross selection<br />
in wheat <strong>breeding</strong>. Euphytica 58:275-287.<br />
Oeveren, A.P, v<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Stam, P. 1992. Comparative simulation studies on the effects of<br />
selection for qu<strong>an</strong>titative traits in autogamous crops: early selection versus single seed<br />
descent. Heredity, 69: 342-351.<br />
Park, S.J., Walsh, E.J., Reinbergs, E., Song, L.S.P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kasha, K.J. 1976. Field perform<strong>an</strong>ce of<br />
doubled haploid barley lines in comparison with lines developed by pedigree <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> single<br />
seed descent methods. C<strong>an</strong>. J. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Sci. 56; 467-474.<br />
Peng, S., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cassm<strong>an</strong>, K.G. 1994. Evolution of new pl<strong>an</strong>t ideotype for increased<br />
rice potential. In: Breaking the Yield Barrier. K,G. Cassm<strong>an</strong> (ed.), Proc. Workshop on <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Yield Potential in Favorable Environments. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 5-20.<br />
Perera, A.L.T., Pahim, M., Sriyoheswar<strong>an</strong> S,, Dh<strong>an</strong>apala, M.P., Senadhira, D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Lawrence,<br />
M.J. 1997. Qu<strong>an</strong>titative <strong>genetics</strong> of rice, I. Evidence of unexploited genetical variation for<br />
yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other qu<strong>an</strong>titative characters in modern índica cultivars. Field Crops Res. (in<br />
press).<br />
Shukla, G.K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental<br />
components of variability. Heredity 29:237-245.<br />
Simmonds, N.W. 1979. Principles of Crop Improvement. Longm<strong>an</strong>, London <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> New York.<br />
Sriyoheswar<strong>an</strong>, S. 1995. Qu<strong>an</strong>titative inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of some agronomic characters of three wide<br />
crosses in rice. Ph. D. thesis, Univ. Birmingham, UK.<br />
Tee, T.W. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Qualset, C .0 .1975. Bulk populations in wheat <strong>breeding</strong>: comparison of single<br />
seed descent <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om bulk methods. Euphytica 24:393-405.<br />
Thomas, W.T.B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tapsell, C.R. 1985. Cross prediction studies in spring barley, 3.<br />
Correlation between characters. Theor, Appl. Genet. 71:550-555.<br />
Yu<strong>an</strong>, L.P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. 1988. Status of hyrbid rice <strong>research</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> development. In: Hybrid<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 7-24.
8<br />
Insect <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Disease<br />
Resist<strong>an</strong>ce in <strong>Rice</strong><br />
A.P.K. Reddy* <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> J.S. Bentur*<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
With the advent of the green revolution in rice during the late sixties^,<br />
there was considerable, accentuation of insect <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> disease problems in<br />
India. Although the extent of losses varied from region to region <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
depended on several factors, inst<strong>an</strong>ces of complete loss of the crop due<br />
to one or two pests have often been reported. The most successful<br />
strategy during the last two decades to m<strong>an</strong>age insects <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> diseases has<br />
been to grow resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> need-based application of<br />
pesticides. Pest-resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties are adv<strong>an</strong>tageous because their use<br />
involves no additional cost nor knowledge base. Resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties are<br />
known for their compatibility with other methods such as biocontrol<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pesticides <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are ecologically safe <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> socially acceptable. Further,<br />
effectiveness of resist<strong>an</strong>t pl<strong>an</strong>ts is not affected by weather vagaries.<br />
Considerable area under rice is currently protected from insect <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
disease damage solely by host pl<strong>an</strong>t resist<strong>an</strong>ce, since viral <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a few<br />
bacterial diseases have no effective chemical protection. The information<br />
available on the ch<strong>an</strong>ging insect <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> disease pest scenario in India <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
the efforts are underway to breed pest-resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties to mitigate<br />
losses associated with major pests are reviewed.<br />
Directorate of <strong>Rice</strong> Research, Rajendr<strong>an</strong>agar, Hyderabad 500030, India.
144 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
MAJOR INSECT PESTS AND DISEASES<br />
Among the 100 insect pests that affect rice crop, stem borers, in<br />
particular the yellow stem borer (YSB) Scirpophaga incertulas, are the<br />
most serious pests in India. Gall midge (GM), Orseolia oryzae causing<br />
silver shoot damage comes next in import<strong>an</strong>ce. Among the pl<strong>an</strong>thoppers,<br />
the brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper (BPH) Nilaparvata lugens <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the whitebacked<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>thopper (WBPH) Sogatella furcifera are the most import<strong>an</strong>t<br />
species, sometimes causing, total devastation of crop the green<br />
leafhopper (GLH) Nephotettix viriscens <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nephotettix nigropictus cause<br />
low damage to the crop as direct feeders but the former as a vector of the<br />
tungro disease causes considerable losses indirectly. <strong>Rice</strong> hispa,<br />
Didadispa armígera, traditionally a sporadic pest, is appearing in m<strong>an</strong>y<br />
areas as a major pest. At times the leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis,<br />
thrips <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> gundhi bug (ear bug) also become serious.<br />
Among the 85 diseases that affect rice crop, blast disease caused by<br />
Pyricutaria grísea is considered a major production constraint. It affects<br />
leaves, nodes, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> p<strong>an</strong>icles. Bacterial blight (BB), caused by X<strong>an</strong>thomonas<br />
oryzae pv oryzae, is a major problem in irrigated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rainfed ecosystems.<br />
Sheath blight, caused by Rhizoctonia sot<strong>an</strong>í, assumed economic<br />
import<strong>an</strong>ce during the 1980's because of ch<strong>an</strong>ged m<strong>an</strong>agement practices<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> altered crop c<strong>an</strong>opy structure. Sheath rots, hither to considered<br />
unimport<strong>an</strong>t as a group have lately become problematic in upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s of eastern India. Tungro disease continues to occur in<br />
cyclic form <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is causing subst<strong>an</strong>tial losses. False smut disease, caused<br />
by Ustilaginoidea vireps, is gaining import<strong>an</strong>ce in northwest <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> eastern<br />
India.<br />
CHANGING INSECT AND DISEASE SCENARIO<br />
i : ,1<br />
During 1965-1995 the number of insect pests under "major pest status"<br />
rose from 3 to 13 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in the case of diseases, from 2 to 8 . Pl<strong>an</strong>thoppers<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leafhoppers assumed major pest status with the advent of the green<br />
revolution. The gall midge has become a major endemic pest in m<strong>an</strong>y<br />
new areas. Sporadic pests such as hispa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the gundhi bug have been<br />
causing serious losses in certain years. Yield losses due to insect pests<br />
have been estimated to r<strong>an</strong>ge from 21-30% (Kalode <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Krishnaiah,<br />
1991). Among diseases, recurrent crop losses were reported due to<br />
epidemics of bacterial blight <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice tungro virus during the era of<br />
high-yielding varieties (HYV). Consequent to varietal shift in the<br />
eighties, blast reemerged as a major problem, especially in rabi (dry<br />
season) rice areas. Sheath blight has been a major concern in eastern
A.P.K. Reddy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> J.S. Bentur 145<br />
India <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the southern state of Kerela. In several stages^ sheath ro t false<br />
smuh leaf scald <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grain discoloration gained economic import<strong>an</strong>ce. In<br />
general, it is estimated that 1 0 % grain is lost in tropical'Asia due to<br />
diseases (Reddy, 1993).<br />
FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR PEST ACCENTUATION<br />
Before the onset of the green revolution, rice was grown in India for<br />
centuries with traditional tall varieties. They lodged when excess<br />
org<strong>an</strong>ic m<strong>an</strong>ners were applied to the field. Therefore, farmers grew<br />
them under low to moderate levels of org<strong>an</strong>ic m<strong>an</strong>ure application.<br />
Farmers generally pl<strong>an</strong>ted several local varieties with diverse genetic<br />
background in a mosaic fashion during <strong>an</strong>y one season. Thus low<br />
nitrogen application <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic diversity in the subsistence ricecropping<br />
system kept pests <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> disease problems to a minimum.<br />
However, there were occasional epidemics of blast, brown spot <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> low<br />
but chronic losses due to stem borers. But with the advent of<br />
monoculture of high-yielding varieties with a narrow genetic base,<br />
excessive use of synthetic nitrogenous fertilizers, absence of crop<br />
diversification, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> double cropping in the rice-rice cropping system<br />
accentuated insect <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> disease problems. Besides varietal shift, some<br />
other factors that accentuated disease problems were (a) ch<strong>an</strong>ges in crop<br />
m<strong>an</strong>agement practices <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> (b) improper pesticide use. Of these factors,<br />
new photo insensitive, dwarf, nitrogen-responsive, profuse tillering,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> short duration varieties with different pl<strong>an</strong>t architecture proved to<br />
be the most congenial hosts for pest development; survival from season<br />
to season led to rapid spread of these pests over vast stretches of rice<br />
areas. Cultivation of HYVs ch<strong>an</strong>ged crop m<strong>an</strong>agement practices. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
cultivation in irrigated areas became a profitable enterprise tempting<br />
farmers to higher use of nitrogenous fertilizers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pesticides to realize<br />
higher returns. Absence of crop diversification coupled with<br />
monoculture of high-yielding quality rices <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> absence of crop discipline<br />
(lack of synchronous pl<strong>an</strong>ting) proved to be other import<strong>an</strong>t reasons for<br />
the upsurge of m<strong>an</strong>y pests. Indiscriminate use of pesticides, particularly<br />
insecticides, was a signific<strong>an</strong>t cause of outbreaks of such insect pests as<br />
BPH during the seventies <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> eighties (Kalode <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Krishnaiah, 1991).<br />
Destruction of natural enemies was found to be the cause for such<br />
outbreaks (Kenmore, 1980), Leaf folders have also been observed in<br />
severe from wherever pyrethroids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> org<strong>an</strong>ophosphorous compounds<br />
were overused.
146 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
HOST PLANT RESISTANCE<br />
Concepts <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Levels of Resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
M■I<br />
In 1968/ V<strong>an</strong> der Pl<strong>an</strong>k recognized two basic types of resist<strong>an</strong>ce on the<br />
basis of genetic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> epidemiological concepts namely: (i) monogenic,<br />
complete, race-specific resist<strong>an</strong>ce (vertical); <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> (ii) polygenic, incomplete,<br />
race non specific resist<strong>an</strong>ce (horizontal). Race-specific resist<strong>an</strong>ce is<br />
qualitative in nature <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> often characterized by hypersensitivity in a<br />
host genotype. Race nonspecific, qu<strong>an</strong>titative resist<strong>an</strong>ce has also been<br />
called field resist<strong>an</strong>ce, generalized resist<strong>an</strong>ce, rate-reducing resist<strong>an</strong>ce,<br />
dilatory resist<strong>an</strong>ce etc. (Lee et ah, 1989).<br />
In recent years, a few other terms related to resist<strong>an</strong>ce, i.e. partial<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> durable resist<strong>an</strong>ce, have come into vogue. Partial resist<strong>an</strong>ce is<br />
qu<strong>an</strong>titative <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> may be equated to field resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Durable resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
is a retrospective concept <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is based on the longevity of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in a<br />
given ecosystem irrespective of genetic control <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> magnitude. It<br />
essentially describes the commercial utility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> longevity of a particular<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t variety.<br />
S p e c if ic r e s is t a n c e<br />
[1ii<br />
Specific resist<strong>an</strong>ce c<strong>an</strong> either be immunity or high level of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />
insects <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pathogens. In neither allows the pathogen to sporulate/<br />
insect pest to multiply nor allows pl<strong>an</strong>t injury under <strong>an</strong>y known<br />
conditions, but it is short lived in nature <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is often known to break<br />
down, with serious economic consequences. In Korea, the resist<strong>an</strong>ce of<br />
the "Tongil" varieties for blast was effective for a 5-year period. In<br />
Jap<strong>an</strong>, the longevity of resist<strong>an</strong>t blast varieties is 3 years (Marchetti <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Bonm<strong>an</strong>, 1989). In Colombia, resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties to blast released during<br />
1969-1986 lasted only for a year or two before being overcome by<br />
previously unidentified virulent races (Ahn <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mulekar, 1986). In<br />
m<strong>an</strong>y inst<strong>an</strong>ces of investigation complete resist<strong>an</strong>ce for blast was<br />
monogenic (Kiyosawa, 1981; Marchetti et ah, 1987). Although racespecific<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce conferred by a single gene or a combination of a few<br />
genes is generally short lived, as <strong>an</strong>ticipated, there are m<strong>an</strong>y inst<strong>an</strong>ces of<br />
such genes proving effective for long periods <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> remaining effective in<br />
m<strong>an</strong>y coimtries, viz. Pi-zt, Pi-b, Pi~ta2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> others. Tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of major<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes into elite cultivars is normally easy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> has been<br />
utilized successfully in m<strong>an</strong>y rice improvement programs,<br />
notwithst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing the breakdown by the new genotypes of pathogen<br />
populations.<br />
Erosion of monogenic resist<strong>an</strong>ce against BPH (conferred by Bphl<br />
gene) in IR 26 within 2 years of its intensive cultivation in the Philippines
A.P.K, Reddy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> J.S. Bentur 147<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Indonesia in the mid-1970s is a classical example of inherent<br />
weakness of monogenic resist<strong>an</strong>ce against insect pests (Cohen et al.,<br />
1997). Similarly^ monogenic resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice against GM conferred by<br />
the Gm2 gene in the resist<strong>an</strong>t variety Phalguna led to the breakdown of<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce consequent to the development of Biotype 4 in parts of<br />
Andhra Pradesh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Maharastra (Bentur et al., 1987).<br />
P a r t ia l r e s is t a n c e<br />
Varieties that lack complete resist<strong>an</strong>ce but sustain only minor losses<br />
from blast are referred to as partially resist<strong>an</strong>t. This kind of resist<strong>an</strong>ce is<br />
qu<strong>an</strong>titative^ race specific (Toriyama; 1975) or race nonspecific (Ezuka^<br />
1979; Yeh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bonm<strong>an</strong>, 1986). In some rice-growing environments<br />
highly conducive to blast, partial resist<strong>an</strong>ce may not be sufficient to<br />
control the disease. In such situations, breeders exploit more complete<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce through gene pyramiding or superimposing complete<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce onto varieties possessing partial resist<strong>an</strong>ce (Bonm<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Mackill, 1988).<br />
Moderate resist<strong>an</strong>ce against insects is characterized by a moderate<br />
level of insect mortality imder a no-choice setup <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> relatively less pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
damage. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce known against the yellow stem borer in cultivated<br />
rice c<strong>an</strong> best be recognized as moderate resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Likewise, the<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce known against polyphagous pests such as the leaf folder,<br />
thrips etc. are of moderate level. Polygenic resist<strong>an</strong>ce to insects is<br />
moderate but is more stable th<strong>an</strong> monogenic resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
against YSB, which is polygenic, has not been lost so far. Nevertheless,<br />
the moderate level of resist<strong>an</strong>ce has a key role to play in pest m<strong>an</strong>agement.<br />
In addition to the above, a recent concept field toler<strong>an</strong>ce has been<br />
introduced. Here the cultivar displays low resist<strong>an</strong>ce or even<br />
susceptibility when tested as a young pl<strong>an</strong>t or under a very rigorous/<br />
no-choice setup. But at the adv<strong>an</strong>ced stage of growth/maturity, such<br />
varieties tend to register relatively less damage th<strong>an</strong> the other<br />
susceptible cultivars. Some of the BPH donors, e.g. Utri Rajapp<strong>an</strong>,<br />
Triveni <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> K<strong>an</strong>c<strong>an</strong>a, have displayed such resist<strong>an</strong>ce/toler<strong>an</strong>ce (P<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Heinrichs, 1983).<br />
D u r a b l e r e s is t a n c e -<br />
Durable resist<strong>an</strong>ce is that which has remained effective for a long period<br />
while a qultivar possessing it has been widely cultivated in <strong>an</strong><br />
environment favoring the disease (Johnson, 1981). Durable resist<strong>an</strong>ce is<br />
retrospective rather th<strong>an</strong> prospective. The definite longevity required<br />
for durable resist<strong>an</strong>ce is not predetermined. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce is referred to as<br />
durable if resist<strong>an</strong>ce of one variety remains effective even though
i-:<br />
'!<br />
148 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
<strong>an</strong>other succumbs to <strong>an</strong> epidemic. The mode of inherit<strong>an</strong>ce is not fully<br />
understood <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> methods to evaluate it are yet to be developed. Only<br />
when such questions are <strong>an</strong>swered, will <strong>breeding</strong> programs for durable<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce attain practical value (Lee et al., 1989).<br />
Some varieties considered having durable blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce are: IR 36<br />
in tropical Asia (Yeh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bonm<strong>an</strong>, 1986); Mily<strong>an</strong>g 30, Mily<strong>an</strong>g 42 in<br />
Korea (Lee et al, 1989); lAC 2 5 ,1 AC 47, Moroberek<strong>an</strong> from. West Africa,<br />
(Nottenghem, 1985); Zhen Sh<strong>an</strong> 97 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zhen Luon 13 in China (Lee et al.,<br />
1989). For bacterial leaf blight in China, resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Nongken 58 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a<br />
few varieties possessing Xa3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xa4 genes was considered durable <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
in the Philippines varieties possessing Xa4 resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene are<br />
considered durable (Lee et al., 1989; Bonm<strong>an</strong> et al, 1992). No such<br />
information exists on durable resist<strong>an</strong>ce to RTV <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other diseases.<br />
GENETICS OF RESISTANCE<br />
Insects<br />
Several studies have been done on genetic characterization of resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
against major insect pests such as BPH, WBPH, GLH, gall midge, stem<br />
borer etc., mainly in the Philippines, India, Jap<strong>an</strong>, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> China. Due to the<br />
prevalence of distinct geographic populations in these cotmtries, the<br />
genetic information obtained in one country need not always hold true<br />
in other countries. This is Well documented as several resist<strong>an</strong>t donors<br />
reported in one country are found to be susceptible in other countries.<br />
Generally, resist<strong>an</strong>ce to insect pests is simply inherited with one or two<br />
domin<strong>an</strong>t/recessive genes (Table 8.1). While the complementary action<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> inhibitory nature of some of the genes were noted, cytoplasmic<br />
influence or strong environmental interaction with the genotype to<br />
influence the phenotype is not common.<br />
I<br />
I<br />
i<br />
PLANTHOPPERS AND LEAFHOPPERS<br />
Studies at IRRI by Khush <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> his group have identified five domin<strong>an</strong>t<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> five recessive genes against BPH four domin<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> two recessive<br />
genes against WBPH, six domin<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> two recessive <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> two yet<br />
unidentified genes against GLH <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> three domin<strong>an</strong>t genes against the<br />
!z;igzag leafhopper (Brar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1991). Of these Bphl, bpH2, Wbphl,<br />
Glhl, Glh2, Glh3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> GlhS are not functional against the South Asi<strong>an</strong><br />
population of pests. Recent studies in China <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jap<strong>an</strong> have suggested<br />
the presence of several new genes conferring resist<strong>an</strong>ce against BPH <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
WBPH which need to be characterized in terms of allelic relationship<br />
with the known genes. Genetic studies in India revealed two or three
n<br />
A.P.K. Reddy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> J.S. Bentur 149<br />
gene involvement in conferring resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH in several inst<strong>an</strong>ces,<br />
whereas a single domin<strong>an</strong>t or recessive gene was responsible for WBPH<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Recent qu<strong>an</strong>titative trait loci (QTL) mapping studies at IRRI<br />
(Alam, 1997) showed that the resist<strong>an</strong>ce of IR64 to the Central Luzon<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IRRI BPH populations is mostly governed by a complex of minor<br />
genes which conform to the durability of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in the variety.<br />
G a l l m id g e a n d S t e m b o r e r<br />
Table 8 .1<br />
Genes conferring resist<strong>an</strong>ce against major pests of rice<br />
Type cultivar/variety (Source)<br />
(3)<br />
Pest<br />
(1)<br />
Gene<br />
(2 )<br />
Brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper. Bfhl Mudgo<br />
Nilaparvata lugens bph2 ASD7<br />
Bph3<br />
Rathu Heenati<br />
bph4<br />
Babawee<br />
bpb5<br />
ARC10550<br />
Bph6<br />
Swarrwlatha<br />
bph7<br />
T12<br />
bphS<br />
Chin saba<br />
Bph9<br />
Balamawee<br />
BphlO(t)<br />
IR65482-4-136-2’2<br />
(Brar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1991)<br />
White-backed pl<strong>an</strong>thopper, Wbphl N22<br />
Sogatdlafurcifera Wbphl ARC10239<br />
Wbph3<br />
ADR52<br />
wbpH4<br />
Podiwi AB<br />
WbphS<br />
N'Di<strong>an</strong>g Marie<br />
Wbph6(t)<br />
Giu-yi-Gu<br />
(Brar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1991)<br />
Green leafhopper. Glhl P<strong>an</strong>khari 203<br />
Nephottetix virescens Glh2 ASD7<br />
Glh3<br />
IR8<br />
glh4<br />
Ptb8<br />
Glh5<br />
ASD8<br />
GIH6<br />
TAPL796<br />
Glh7<br />
Maddai Karupp<strong>an</strong><br />
glhS<br />
DV85<br />
(Brar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1991)<br />
Gall midge, Gml W1263<br />
Orseolia oryzae Gtti2 Siam 29<br />
Gm4(t)<br />
Abhaya<br />
Gm6(i) Dukong No. 1<br />
(Chaudury et al, 1985,<br />
Srivastav et ai, 1994,<br />
Katiyar et aL, 1996)<br />
Blast, Pi-a Jae Keum<br />
Pyricularia grísea Pi-b Tjina<br />
Pi-I<br />
Doazi Chali<br />
Contd
150 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Pest<br />
(1)<br />
Gene<br />
(2 )<br />
Type cultivar/variety (Source)<br />
(3)<br />
Pi~k<br />
Yakei-ko<br />
Pi-kh HR2 2<br />
Pi~kp<br />
Pusur<br />
Pi-ks<br />
To-to<br />
Pi-ta<br />
Oka-ine<br />
Pi-zt<br />
Co25<br />
(Kiyosawa, 1977)<br />
Bacterial blight. Xal Kogyoku<br />
X<strong>an</strong>thomonas oryzae Xal Tetep<br />
pv. oryzae Xa3 Wase Aikoku<br />
Xa4<br />
TKM6<br />
Xa5<br />
DZ192<br />
Xa7<br />
DV85<br />
Xa8<br />
PI231129<br />
XalO<br />
CaS209<br />
Xal3<br />
BJl<br />
Xa21<br />
Oryza longistamimta<br />
(Ogawa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kush, 1989)<br />
A single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene generally confers resist<strong>an</strong>ce against the gall<br />
midge. While two domin<strong>an</strong>t genes have been designated as Gmt <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Gm2, conferring resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice varieties W1263 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Phalguna<br />
respectively^ (Chaudhary et. ah, 1985), <strong>an</strong>other seven genes have been<br />
tentatively designated. In view of the prevalence of at least six different<br />
biotypes in the country, biotype specific resist<strong>an</strong>ce was studied. It was<br />
found that separate genes confer resist<strong>an</strong>ce to a specific biotype <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
despite the presence of m<strong>an</strong>y domin<strong>an</strong>t genes in a cultivar, only one of<br />
them will express in response to attack by a specific biotype (Reddy et<br />
at., 1997). Against the stem borer, one single recessive or three<br />
complementary genes have been reported in variety TKM 6 . The allelic<br />
relationship of these genes is not well studied.<br />
Diseases<br />
B l a s t<br />
. ;l!<br />
Scattered genetic studies on blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce started before physiologic<br />
races were generally recognized. M<strong>an</strong>y such studies used specific races.<br />
From these studies it appeared that resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties carried one, two,<br />
or occasionally three genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> most of these genes were<br />
domin<strong>an</strong>t (Table 8.1). Kiyosawa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> his colleagues in Jap<strong>an</strong> did the most<br />
extensive studies during the early seventies. They identified 13<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes; two were found in japónica varieties while the others<br />
were from exotic cultivars. Kiyosawa (1972) proposed the gene-for-gene<br />
concept <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> linkages for genes known up to that time. Recent studies<br />
have provided a great deal of new information. Marchetti et aL (1987)<br />
identified three recessive genes that confer resist<strong>an</strong>ce to US races IC-17,
A.P.K. Reddy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> J.S. Bentur 151<br />
IG-1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IH-1 . At the International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (IRRI)/ the<br />
Philippines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Central <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (CRRI)^ India, a few<br />
of the traditional rice cultivars evaluated had one or two domin<strong>an</strong>t<br />
genes. It was also observed that one or two domin<strong>an</strong>t genes (< biblio >)<br />
controlled isolate-specific resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Similar results were reported in<br />
West Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Latin America, where several domin<strong>an</strong>t resist<strong>an</strong>t genes<br />
were reported (Nottenghem, 1985).<br />
B a c t e r ia l l e a f b l ig h t<br />
Reports on <strong>genetics</strong> of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BB indicate that major genes confer<br />
high levels of resist<strong>an</strong>ce, which were qualitative in nature. At IRRI,<br />
using the Philippine races of the pathogen, 15 genes for BB resist<strong>an</strong>ces<br />
were identified (Table 8.1). Xal, Xa2, Xa3, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> XalO convey a high<br />
degree of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to a few Jap<strong>an</strong>ese <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Philippine races of BB<br />
patiiogen, whereas Xa3, Xa4, Xa5, Xa8, Xal3, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xa21 confer a high<br />
degree of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to the South Asi<strong>an</strong> population of BB pathogen. X«4<br />
is the major resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene present in several of the rice cultivars<br />
released for commercial cultivation in the Philippines, viz. IR 20 through<br />
IR 72. Several cultivars possessing Xai are also widely cultivated in<br />
southern China. Genetics of BB resist<strong>an</strong>ce has been extensively studied<br />
in India <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> several domin<strong>an</strong>t/recessive genes have been reported<br />
against the local races of X. oryzae (Table 8.1). Under Indi<strong>an</strong> conditions<br />
the functional resist<strong>an</strong>t genes are Xa3, Xa5 + Xa7, Xa8, Xal3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xa21<br />
(DRR, 1992).<br />
R ic e T u n g r o V ir u s (RTV)<br />
Studies on gerietics of RTV resist<strong>an</strong>ce are few. Preliminary studies<br />
conducted in earlier years at IRRI <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in India showed resist<strong>an</strong>ce to be<br />
domin<strong>an</strong>t (IRRI, 1966; Shastri et al,, 1972) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> governed by a single or<br />
two or three genes. Seetharam<strong>an</strong> et al. (1976) showed that three genes are<br />
involved in resist<strong>an</strong>t parents Kataribhog <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kamod 253^ Shahjah<strong>an</strong> et<br />
al. (1991) reported that varieties Utri Mearah, Kataribhog, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P<strong>an</strong>khari<br />
203 were resist<strong>an</strong>t to RTSV. It was observed that resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Utri<br />
Mearah is controlled by a single recessive gene while three<br />
complementary genes govern resist<strong>an</strong>ce in P<strong>an</strong>kari 203. The author also<br />
noted that restrictive multiplication of RTBV in Utri Mearah was a<br />
polygenic character. Studies at IRRI have shown that RTV is a complex<br />
disease <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis is complicated. Resist<strong>an</strong>ces to green<br />
leafhopper (GLH) segregate in <strong>breeding</strong> material <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> interfere with<br />
assessment of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to RTV (Hibino et al., 1987). A single domin<strong>an</strong>t<br />
gene governed RTSV resist<strong>an</strong>ce when <strong>an</strong>alysis was done independently<br />
by ELISA <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>tibiosis experiments.
152 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
MECHANISM OF RESISTANCE<br />
Insects<br />
M o r p h o l o g ic a l t r a it s<br />
i.'ll<br />
A general association between morphological <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>atomical characters<br />
of the pl<strong>an</strong>t (like height <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thickness of stem/ leaf blade width <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
texture, leaf sheath compactness, length of the elongated internode, etc.)<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insect resist<strong>an</strong>ce was reported by earlier workers, but none per se<br />
was shown to be the real cause of resist<strong>an</strong>ce (Pathak, 1969). Leaf<br />
pubescence, for inst<strong>an</strong>ce, did not account for the large differences noted<br />
in number of eggs laid by the striped stem borer on the resist<strong>an</strong>t hairy<br />
leaves of TKM 6 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the susceptible glabrous leaves of Rexoro. Likewise,<br />
leaf hairiness or compactness of leaf sheath implicated in gall midge<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce (Roy et al., 1969; Rao et ah, 1971) were later refuted to be the<br />
cause of resist<strong>an</strong>ce (Sain <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kalode, 1994). Studies on the leaf folder<br />
showed only a weak positive correlation between leaf width <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leaf<br />
damage among varieties <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a negative correlation between trichome<br />
density on leaf <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> egg-laying preference by C. medinalis (Dakshay<strong>an</strong>i et<br />
ah, 1993),<br />
A n t ix e n o s is (N o n p r e f e r e n c e )<br />
Give a choice, insects generally prefer susceptible verieties to resist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
ones for alighting, shelter <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> oviposition. This is mainly a behavioral<br />
response with a possible involvement of semiochemicals. However,<br />
preference may also result from gustatory-mediated responses. A higher<br />
number of adults/nymphs settling on susceptible varieties th<strong>an</strong> on<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties is generally seen in the case of leaf <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>thoppers<br />
(Kalode, 1983; Baqui, 1990; Mishra <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Misra, 1991). Such a response is<br />
more pronounced with time lag, thereby indicating involvement of<br />
feeding stimuli. Antixenosis for oviposition is more discrete <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is<br />
mediated through a different set of cues (Thompson <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pellmyr, 1991).<br />
This phenomenon is widely reported for leafhoppers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>thoppers<br />
(Kalode, 1983; Mishra <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Misra, 1991) the stem borer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice hispa,<br />
but not for the leaf folder (Dakshay<strong>an</strong>i et ah, 1993) or gall midge (Sain<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kalode, 1994).<br />
A n t ib io s is<br />
More widespread <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> distinct physiological resist<strong>an</strong>ce involves<br />
<strong>an</strong>tibiotic effects of the resist<strong>an</strong>t pl<strong>an</strong>t on the insect pest. These m<strong>an</strong>ifest<br />
as reduced nymphal/larval survival, poor growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> development.
A.P.K. Reddy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> J.S. Bentur 153<br />
lowered pupation rate^, weaker adults <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> low build-up of pest<br />
population through generations (Ramaraju <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Babu, 1990), though<br />
hypersensitive reaction against insect pest attack is rare but not<br />
uncommon (Fern<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>es, 1990). Some of the rice varieties resist<strong>an</strong>t to the<br />
gall midge display hypersensitive reaction with tissue necrosis at the<br />
site of attack leading to insect mortality (Bentur <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kalode, 1996). This<br />
type of resist<strong>an</strong>ce is also inducible against a virulent biotype through<br />
prior infestation by <strong>an</strong> avirulent biotype . The possible role of phenols is<br />
suspected.<br />
T o l e r a n c e<br />
In some rice varieties, toler<strong>an</strong>ce is noted as the basis of resist<strong>an</strong>ce,<br />
especially against pl<strong>an</strong>thoppers (P<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Heinrichs, 1983). Here the<br />
host pl<strong>an</strong>t exhibits <strong>an</strong> ability to grow <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reproduce normally or repair<br />
injury due to insect feeding to a marked degree in spite of supporting a<br />
population approximately equal to that which would severely damage a<br />
susceptible variety (P<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1995).<br />
P l a n t b io c h e m ic a l s<br />
Correlative studies on resist<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> susceptible pl<strong>an</strong>t varieties, generally<br />
suggest that the amount of major elements such as nitrogen, potash, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
silica present in the pl<strong>an</strong>t tissue influences growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> development of<br />
stem borers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leaf folders (Pathak 1969; Ramach<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>r<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kh<strong>an</strong><br />
1991; Sudhakar et aL, 1991). Feeding studies on BPH revealed that oxalic<br />
acid <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> p-sitosterol acted as deterrents (Hopkins, 1991) while higher<br />
amino acid content <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lower phenols favored GLH perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
(Visw<strong>an</strong>ath<strong>an</strong> arid Kalode, 1990). Steam distillates of resist<strong>an</strong>t/<br />
susceptible varieties have been shown to elicit various behavioral/<br />
physiological effects on insects. These effects have been attributed to<br />
undefined allelochemicals.<br />
Diseases<br />
Infection of pl<strong>an</strong>ts by fungal <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bacterial pathogens results in <strong>an</strong><br />
inducible defense response. This c<strong>an</strong> include synthesis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> accumulation<br />
of phytoalexins, reinforcement of cell walls by deposition of callóse,<br />
lignin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> related phenols, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong> increase in the activity of hydrolytic<br />
enzymes such as chitinases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> gluconases. Most of the information<br />
available on the mech<strong>an</strong>ism of resist<strong>an</strong>ce pertains to a few fungal <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
bacterial diseases. Early works are mostly correlation studies—<br />
correlation of silicon content with resist<strong>an</strong>ce, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the increased content<br />
of nitrogenous compounds including amino adds, amines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soluble
154 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
nitrogen, with susceptibility. More recent studies have dealt with hostparasite<br />
interaction <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more specifically with host cultivar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
pathogenic race.<br />
B l a s t<br />
Different subst<strong>an</strong>ces in pl<strong>an</strong>ts such as epicuticular waxes, free phenols<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cell wall bound phenoloxidases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> phytoalexins were reported to<br />
operate against the blast pathogen. However, none of these mech<strong>an</strong>isms<br />
are universal in nature (Sridhar et al, 1990). Cuticular waxes of varieties<br />
susceptible to blast favor development of a large number of appressoria<br />
when compared with those of resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties. Intense tissue<br />
browning, a characteristic feature of resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties, limits the growth<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sporulation of the pathogen. The biochemical processes associated<br />
with tissue browning affect pathogen development. Cell walls of rice<br />
leaf blades contain cinnamate derivatives <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the toxic activities of p-<br />
coumarate, ferulate <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their oxidized products are associated with<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce. A few compounds such as probenazol were developed for<br />
controlling blast disease, which augment development of phytoalexins<br />
that reduce fungal growth. However, it was also shown that resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
to P. grísea is not always governed by phytoalexins.<br />
B a c t e r ia l l e a f b l ig h t<br />
The resist<strong>an</strong>ce mech<strong>an</strong>ism of rice cultivars to X. oryzae involves induced<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce, protective reaction of <strong>an</strong>tibacterial compounds <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a few<br />
other general mech<strong>an</strong>isms associated with pl<strong>an</strong>t defense mech<strong>an</strong>isms.<br />
Induced resist<strong>an</strong>ce was noted when the rice pl<strong>an</strong>t was challenged with<br />
<strong>an</strong> incompatible isolate of the pathogen prior to infection by a compatible<br />
isolate. Also, preinoculation of either incompatible pathogen or<br />
nonpathogen c<strong>an</strong> induce resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice against primary compatible<br />
challengers. In some resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties, ultrastructural ch<strong>an</strong>ges of rice<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts to incompatible isolates of X. oryzae have been demonstrated<br />
where the bacterial cells are immobilized by fibrillate material induced<br />
from the cell walls of the host. A few workers have also demonstrated<br />
the postinfection defense mech<strong>an</strong>isms with tissue specificity. A group of<br />
<strong>an</strong>tibacterial compounds such as tr<strong>an</strong>s 2 -hexenal, tr<strong>an</strong>s 2 -hexeonoic acid<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cos 3-hexeonic acid, syringaldéhyde, coniferaldehyde have been<br />
identified <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> associated with resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts to X. oryzae.<br />
Purushotham<strong>an</strong> (1975) reported the presence of a larger amount of total<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ortho-dihydroxy phenols in resist<strong>an</strong>t cultivars th<strong>an</strong> in susceptible<br />
cultivars. Reddy et al. (1977) suggested the role of phenols in the<br />
restriction of BB pathogen in the host tissue.
A.PX. Reddy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> J.S. Bentur 155<br />
B r o w n s p o t<br />
Some <strong>an</strong>atomical features of rice leaves have been observed to be related<br />
to resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Several workers in earlier years have shown that thicker<br />
epidermal cells <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more silicated cells are positively connected with<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Some reports also indicate the involvement of phenol<br />
compounds <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their oxidation system in the resist<strong>an</strong>ce mech<strong>an</strong>ism<br />
(Ou, 1985).<br />
BREEDING FOR RESISTANCE AND GENETIC GAINS<br />
Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to Insects<br />
Resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties play a vital role in the m<strong>an</strong>agement of insect pests, in<br />
particular the endemic ones, e.g. brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> gall midge.<br />
Diversified sources of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to insect pests have been identified<br />
through glasshouse <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> field screening, A total of 261 donors resist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
to BPH, 184 to WBPH, 194 to GM <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 28 to leaf folder were identified.<br />
Strong <strong>breeding</strong> programs supported by multilocation testing under the<br />
coordinated program resulted in the development <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> release of 36<br />
varieties resist<strong>an</strong>t to gall midge, 24 to brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper, 3 each to stem<br />
borer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> green leafhopper, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one to the white-backed pl<strong>an</strong>thopper<br />
(Table 8.2). Of the GM resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties, all are resist<strong>an</strong>t to GM Biotype<br />
1; 24 against Bio type 2; 11 against Bio type 3; 9 against Biotype 4; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 6<br />
against Biotype 5. M<strong>an</strong>y of these resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties possessing high yield<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other desirable agronomic traits have been cultivated extensively in<br />
pest-prone areas either as a principal method of control or as a<br />
supplement to other methods of insect pest m<strong>an</strong>agement.<br />
Multiple Resist<strong>an</strong>ce against Insect Pests<br />
Pest problems have become more complex in recent years because m<strong>an</strong>y<br />
pests occur in a given area at the same time <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cause signific<strong>an</strong>t damage.<br />
Hence screening <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>breeding</strong> programs have been reoriented to develop<br />
varieties with resist<strong>an</strong>ce to more th<strong>an</strong> one insect pest. A number of donors,<br />
such as Velluthacheera, ADR 52, P<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>i, Chennellu, etc., have been<br />
identified to possess multiple pest resist<strong>an</strong>ce (Kalode et aU, 1977).<br />
Varieties developed with multiple pest resist<strong>an</strong>ce are listed below.<br />
Variety<br />
Suraksha<br />
Shaktim<strong>an</strong><br />
Lalat<br />
Rasmi<br />
Daya<br />
Samalei<br />
Pests<br />
GM, BPH, WBPH<br />
GM, BPH, WBPH<br />
GM, BPH,GLH<br />
GM,BPH<br />
GM,BPH,GLH<br />
GM,BPH,GLH
156 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to Diseases<br />
Host pl<strong>an</strong>t resist<strong>an</strong>ce has also been <strong>an</strong> import<strong>an</strong>t component in rice<br />
disease m<strong>an</strong>agement. Massive screening programs operated at various<br />
levels in the country during the past two decades have identified several<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t donors^ leading to the development of several commercial<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties for major diseases (Table 8.2). These varieties have<br />
been utilized as a principal method for combating the pests.<br />
B l a s t<br />
ill<br />
A large number of blast-resist<strong>an</strong>t cultivars are available in India <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
elsewhere. But a population of P, grísea quickly adapts to these varieties<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> resist<strong>an</strong>ce breaks down. For inst<strong>an</strong>ce/ the rice varieties NLR 9672/<br />
Int<strong>an</strong>, Tellahamsa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> others are no longer effective against the local<br />
races of the pathogen. On the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>/ m<strong>an</strong>y varieties grown in<br />
rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> irrigated rices do possess toler<strong>an</strong>ce to blast disease.<br />
A few widely cultivated blast-resist<strong>an</strong>t cultivars are Rasb IR 36/<br />
Swarnadh<strong>an</strong> among others. The primary donors for resist<strong>an</strong>t cultivars<br />
in Indi<strong>an</strong> conditions have been Co4/ MTU5/ Zenith/ Tetep, Tadiik<strong>an</strong>, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
others. To avoid the boom-<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>-bust cycle, efforts are underway to<br />
develop varieties that have better levels of qu<strong>an</strong>titative resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
(Reddy, 1993).<br />
B a c t e r ia l l e a f b l iC h t<br />
Of the 535 varieties released in India, about 35 possess a moderate level<br />
of BB resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Only a few of these, viz. IR 20, IR 36, Saket 4, Swarna,<br />
Mahsuri derivatives, Biraj, Radha, Sura], <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Daya are widely grown. A<br />
highly resist<strong>an</strong>t variety, Ajaya, was recently released for commercial<br />
cultivation (Reddy, 1993). Although a high degree of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BB is<br />
achieved through <strong>breeding</strong> programs, varieties with field toler<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
helped to reduce BB epidemics. Cultivars such as Saket 4, IR 20, Swarna<br />
did not suffer much pest damage even when pl<strong>an</strong>ted on large acres in<br />
different states.<br />
R ic e T u n g r o V ir u s<br />
Breeding for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to RTV, as mentioned earlier, is complicated by<br />
several factors. However, success has been achieved in developing RTV<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t cultivars such as Vikramarya, Radha, lET 9994, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a few<br />
others. Several new techniques coming into vogue, such as ELISA, could<br />
simplify screening procedures for detection of RTSV <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> RTBV<br />
independently <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> help to develop RTV-resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties.
A.P.ÍC. Reddy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> J.S. Bentur 157<br />
Table 8,2<br />
Resist<strong>an</strong>ce donors <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> varieties ivith resist<strong>an</strong>ce to major pests<br />
developed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> released for commercial cultivation in India.<br />
Pest<br />
Donors<br />
(1)<br />
(2 )<br />
Brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper. ARC 5984, ARC 6650,<br />
Karivennel, Leb Mue<br />
Nh<strong>an</strong>g,<br />
M<strong>an</strong>oharsali, Oorapundy,<br />
Ptb 10, Ptb 18,<br />
Ptb 21, Ptb 33<br />
White-backed<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>thopper Ptb 33 HKR120<br />
Varieties released<br />
(3)<br />
Chait<strong>an</strong>ya, Krishnaveni,<br />
Vajram, Pratibha,<br />
Makom, Pavizham,<br />
M<strong>an</strong>asarovar, Co42,<br />
Ch<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><strong>an</strong>a, Nagarajuna,<br />
Sonasali, Rasmi,<br />
Jyothi, Bhadra,<br />
Neela, Ann<strong>an</strong>ga,<br />
Daya, Aruna, K<strong>an</strong>akaa,<br />
Remya, Bharatidas<strong>an</strong>,<br />
Karthika<br />
Gall midge<br />
C R 143; Eswarkora,<br />
Leu<strong>an</strong>g 152, Ob 677,<br />
Ptb 21, Siam 29<br />
Ptb 10, Ptb 18,<br />
Divya, Dh<strong>an</strong>ya Lakshmi,<br />
Kakatiya, Erramallelu,<br />
Kama, Ruchi, Orugallu,<br />
Kavya, Rajendradh<strong>an</strong> 202,<br />
Mdu 3, Buhb<strong>an</strong>, Samalei,<br />
Phalguna, Mahaveer,<br />
Vibhava,<br />
Pratap, Udaya, IR36,<br />
Sarasa, Neela, Lalat,<br />
Shakti, Suraksha, Daya,<br />
Shaktim<strong>an</strong>, Tara, Kshira,<br />
Sneha, Poth<strong>an</strong>a,<br />
Surekha, Vikram, Kunti<br />
Usha, Asha, Abhaya<br />
Stem borer TKM 6 Ratna, Sasyasree, Vikas<br />
Blast<br />
Bacterial Blight<br />
Tetep, Taduk<strong>an</strong>,<br />
Zenith, Co4,<br />
Moroberek<strong>an</strong>, Correon,<br />
Dissi Hatif, Taride 1<br />
lAC 25, IRAT3<br />
BJ1,TKM6,<br />
Lacrosee, Zenith,<br />
Nira, Java 14,<br />
Wase-aikoku<br />
Rasi, Akasi,<br />
Sasyasree, V<strong>an</strong>i<br />
Improved Sona, Morth 18,<br />
Himdh<strong>an</strong>, Himalaya-1,<br />
Himalaya-2, K332,<br />
K333, HPU 741,<br />
VLB, VLK 39,<br />
NLR 9672, IRS,<br />
IR20, IR36, IR64,<br />
P<strong>an</strong>t Dh<strong>an</strong> 10, VL Dh<strong>an</strong> 221<br />
Mahsuri, Prasad,<br />
Ramakrishna, Saket 4,<br />
Sasyasree, IET4141,<br />
CNM540,IR20,<br />
IR54, IR64,<br />
Ajaya, Asha Daya<br />
{Contd.)
158 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Pest<br />
(1)<br />
Sheath blight<br />
Donors<br />
(2)<br />
T141, OS4<br />
BCP3, Saibham,<br />
Bhuhj<strong>an</strong>, Saduwee,<br />
Laka, Ramedja,<br />
Ta-Oo-Cho-z, Athebu<br />
Phourel, ARC 15368<br />
Varieties released<br />
(3)<br />
P<strong>an</strong>kaj, Swamadh<strong>an</strong>,.<br />
M<strong>an</strong>asarovar<br />
Brown spot<br />
T141, BAMIO,<br />
Chl3, Ch45<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> tungro Ftb 2, Ptb 18, ADT 21,<br />
ARC 10599, ARC 14320,<br />
ARC 14766<br />
Rasi, Jag<strong>an</strong>nath<br />
IR36, IR42<br />
CNM529, CNM'540<br />
Vikramarya, Radha<br />
ïl :<br />
RICE SHEATH BLIGHT<br />
Most of the released varieties are highly susceptible to sheath blight <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
a high degfee of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in O. saliva is not available. A few cultivars,<br />
e.g. P<strong>an</strong>kaj <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Swarnadh<strong>an</strong>^ have toler<strong>an</strong>ce to this disease.<br />
M u l t ip l e d is e a s e r e s is t a n c e<br />
A rice crop in a given area may be vulnerable to attack by different<br />
pathogens at different growth stages of the crop or^ due to the incidence<br />
of certain diseases, be predisposed to other diseases. For example, RTV<br />
or BB infections in the early growth stages weaken the pl<strong>an</strong>ts <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
predispose them to sheath rot infections. The synergistic action of two or<br />
more diseases may cause extensive crop losses, indicating the need to<br />
develop resist<strong>an</strong>ce for more th<strong>an</strong> one disease (Reddy et al., 1986). But<br />
until recently, no systematic efforts made to develop multirésist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
varieties, because most multiple disease-resist<strong>an</strong>t donors have not been<br />
available for commercial exploitation. The All-Ind|.a Coordinated <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Improvement Program (AICRIP) therefore undertook evaluation of<br />
adv<strong>an</strong>ced <strong>breeding</strong> lines for multiple stresses under various<br />
environments. A few commercial varieties developed for resist<strong>an</strong>ce/<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce to more th<strong>an</strong> one disease are listed below.<br />
Variety<br />
Disease<br />
IR36 Blast, Brown spot 1<br />
Rasi Blast, Brown spot * ^<br />
Vikramarya<br />
RTV, Blast<br />
Swamadh<strong>an</strong><br />
Blast, Sheath blight<br />
P<strong>an</strong>kaj Sheath blight/Blast -1<br />
Radha<br />
Blast, Sheath blight<br />
CNM539 Blast, Brown spot, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> RTV %<br />
In view of the complexity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> high rate of mutability <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> evolution<br />
of new pathotypes/races, it is more difficult to breed for multiple<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce in a given ecosystem. Moreover, more complex "R" genes in a
A.P.K. Reddy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> J.S. Bentur 159<br />
host system preclude the development of desirable agronomic traits<br />
such as yield quality/ etc. This has been the experience of <strong>breeding</strong><br />
programs; nonetheless, the search for multiple resist<strong>an</strong>ce in commercial<br />
cultivars continues.<br />
RESISTANT VARIETIES IN INTEGRATED POST MANAG1ÇMENT<br />
Breeding pest resist<strong>an</strong>t rice cultivars is one of the primary aims of rice<br />
improvement programs worldwide as varietal resist<strong>an</strong>ce c<strong>an</strong> be the<br />
major strategy in rice integrated pest m<strong>an</strong>agement (IPM), Most rice<br />
farmers in Asia have small l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>holdings <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> derive relatively low<br />
income from rice production. Some of the limitations, for example,<br />
prohibitive pesticide cost, lack of credit facilities to purchase the<br />
pesticides, lack of knowledge <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> skill to use pesticides effectively, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
the concomit<strong>an</strong>t harmful effects of pesticides compel IPM pl<strong>an</strong>ners to<br />
overwhelmingly depend upon the genetic resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice for pest<br />
control. Peshresist<strong>an</strong>t varieties are adv<strong>an</strong>tageous because their use<br />
involves neither additional cost nor a knowledge base. Resist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
varieties are also known for their compatibility with other control<br />
methods viz. biocontrol <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cultural practices, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thus are ecologically<br />
safe <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> socially acceptable. Further perform<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>t pl<strong>an</strong>ts is<br />
not affected by weather vagaries.<br />
In gall midge endemic districts in Teleng<strong>an</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the northern<br />
coastal districts of Andhra Pradesh, cultivation of gall midge-resist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
varieties such as Surekha <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Phalguna in over 70% of the rice area<br />
brought down pests to a minor level, resulting in about 45% increase in<br />
yield levels. Similar results were realized by cultivation of BPH-resist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
varieties Chait<strong>an</strong>ya, Vajram, Krishnaveni in the coastal districts of<br />
Andhra Pradesh; M 05, M 06, M 07 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jyothi in Kutt<strong>an</strong>ad area of<br />
Kerala. In stem borer prone areas, cultivation of moderately resist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
varieties Vikas <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sasyasree needed occasional additional protection<br />
(Krishnaiah <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reddy, 1989; Desai, 1987). Vikramarya <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lET 9444<br />
could successfully check the viral disease (Reddy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reddy, 1993).<br />
USE OF BIOTECHNOLOGY<br />
In the past, genetic improvement for pest resist<strong>an</strong>ce has been achieved<br />
mainly through the application of classical <strong>genetics</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> conventional<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t-<strong>breeding</strong> methods. Pl<strong>an</strong>t breeders have relied upon the primary<br />
gene pool. The growing complexity of the pest-disease syndrome<br />
warr<strong>an</strong>ted newer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> novel genes/me<strong>an</strong>s beyond the conventional gene<br />
pool, however. Recent adv<strong>an</strong>ces in the fields of cellular <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> molecular
I<br />
I<br />
160 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
biology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> available tools of genetic engineering offer <strong>an</strong> array of<br />
innovative approaches to exploit rare <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> novel gene sources from<br />
dist<strong>an</strong>tly related species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> even unrelated org<strong>an</strong>isms <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> move these<br />
genes into the rice genome.<br />
Cell/tissue Culture Techniques<br />
Among various cell/tissue culture techniques, embryo rescue <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
somacloning find extensive application in genetic enh<strong>an</strong>cement of rice.<br />
Using the embryo rescue technique resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes for BPH <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> WBPH<br />
were successfully tr<strong>an</strong>sferred to elite O. sativa cultures from O. officinalis,<br />
O. minuta, O. latifolia, O, australiensis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. gr<strong>an</strong>ulata (Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush,<br />
1987; Ye <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Saxena, 1990; Velusamy, 1991; Brar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1995). The<br />
YSB resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene from O. hrachy<strong>an</strong>tka is also being to tr<strong>an</strong>sferred to<br />
cultivated rice (Bennett et ah, 1997).<br />
Molecular Markers<br />
Marker-aided selection offers greater adv<strong>an</strong>tage for gene pyramiding.<br />
Gene tags useful for BB resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes Xai, Xa5, Xal3, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xa21 have<br />
been identified <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> suitable selectable markers developed. These<br />
markers help in the identification of two or more genes that have been<br />
combined in one individual pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> assess the effectiveness of 2 - 4<br />
gene pyramids (Zh<strong>an</strong>g et ah, 1996; Hu<strong>an</strong>g et ah, 1997). Three gall midgeresist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
genes—Gm2, Gm4(t), Gm6(t) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one gene each for BPH-<br />
BphW(t), QLU~~Glh? (in ARC 11554) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> WFBH~~Wbphl have been<br />
tagged <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mapped (Bennett et ah, 1997). Once suitable markers are<br />
available for these <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> m<strong>an</strong>y more similar genes, tasks like gene<br />
pyramiding for durable <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> multiple resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>breeding</strong> will be made<br />
easier.<br />
Gene Cloning <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Introgression of Cloned Genes<br />
A r<strong>an</strong>ge of novel genes for insect resist<strong>an</strong>ce is now available for<br />
incorporation into <strong>an</strong>y pl<strong>an</strong>t genome (Carozzi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Koziel, 1997). Genes<br />
from the ubiquitous soil bacterium. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), encoding a<br />
class of insecticidal crystal proteins, have been successfully incorporated<br />
into the rice genome. Tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic pl<strong>an</strong>ts with crylAh (Fujimoto et ah,<br />
1993; Wunn et ah, 1996; Ghareyazie et ah, 1997; Wu et ah, 1997; Cheng et<br />
ah, 1998) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cry 1 Ac (Nayak et ah, 1997, Cheng et ah, 1998) genes have<br />
been reported to be resist<strong>an</strong>t to rice pests such as YSB, LF, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> striped<br />
stem borer. Genes for expression of protease inhibitors from pl<strong>an</strong>t
A.P.K. Reddy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ).S. Bentur 161<br />
sources have also been used in rice tr<strong>an</strong>sformation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> these pl<strong>an</strong>ts<br />
carrying potato proteinase inhibitor II (Du<strong>an</strong> et al, 1996), cowpea trypsin<br />
inhibitor (CpTi) (Xu et al, 1996) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> corn cystatin (Irie et ah, 1996) genes<br />
are also insect resist<strong>an</strong>t. These <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> m<strong>an</strong>y more of the new resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
genes now available will fill the gap in the primary gene pool; thus a<br />
high level of resist<strong>an</strong>ce against such pests as YSB is now feasible.<br />
Good sources of resist<strong>an</strong>ce against sheath blight fungus Rhizoctonia<br />
sol<strong>an</strong>i are lacking. A novel gene encoding chitinase enzyme has been<br />
incorporated into the rice genome using a constitutive promoter<br />
CaMV35S (Datta et ah, 1996). These tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic pl<strong>an</strong>ts are currently being<br />
evaluated for sheath blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Novel genes have also been<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sgressed into rice to confer resist<strong>an</strong>ce against viral diseases.<br />
Successful tr<strong>an</strong>sformation include: against RTBV (rice tungro bacilliform<br />
virus) a gene encoding complete or mutated viral protein (Kloti et ah,<br />
Í996); against RTSV (rice tungro spherical virus) a gene for coat protein<br />
(Shivam<strong>an</strong>i et ah, 1996)^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> against RRSV (rice ragged stunt virus) basal,<br />
genome segments coding nonstructural protein (Upadhyaya et al., 1996).<br />
The new BB gene Xa21 has been cloned (Ronald et ah, 1994) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> has been<br />
used for tr<strong>an</strong>sformation of several commercial varieties. Some of these<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic rices are proposed for field evaluation in the Philippines<br />
during 1998 (Benneth pers. commu.). Use of such a native gene to<br />
develop new resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties through tr<strong>an</strong>sformation technology does<br />
not alter the rest of the genetic constitution of the variety tr<strong>an</strong>sformed<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thus saves time involved in conventional <strong>breeding</strong> through several<br />
cycles of backcrosses.<br />
DNA Fingerprinting <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Diversity in Pest Populations<br />
The third area in which biotechnology aids utilization of host pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce is underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing biodiversity in pest populations. A series of<br />
repetitive DNA elements have been isolated from the genome of X.<br />
oryzae, causal org<strong>an</strong>ism for BB, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> used for DNA fingerprinting of<br />
various collections of pathogen strains. Spatial distribution of the<br />
pathogen within India was delineated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> functional resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes<br />
for the common lineages/pathotypes were determined (Yashitola et ah,<br />
1997). Restricted fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) <strong>an</strong>alysis has<br />
been successfully used to detect genetic variability in Asia (Adhikari et<br />
ah, 1995; George et ah, 1997). Considerable progress has been made in<br />
the last decade in studying population variability of the blast pathogen<br />
P. grísea. Sexually compatible strains of the fungus have been identified<br />
in natural populations <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> molecular karyotypes have been determined.<br />
Also, population biology of the fungus has been clarified <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> progress<br />
toward genetic identification, cloning, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> characterization of
162 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sposable elements <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> host/cultivar specificity genes has been<br />
made. Information gained from these <strong>an</strong>alyses played a key role in the<br />
development of national <strong>breeding</strong> strategies such as lineage exclusion<br />
(Leong et al, 1994; Zeigler et ah, 1994). DNA fingerprinting involving<br />
APLP techniques has recently been used in a study on Asi<strong>an</strong> rice gall<br />
midge populations from six different countries (Bermett et ah, 1997).<br />
This study suggested that evolution of the new gall midge biotype (now<br />
designated as Biotype 6 ) in the northeastern state of M<strong>an</strong>ipur (India)<br />
was more likely through migration of the pest from China rather th<strong>an</strong><br />
through selection pressure of the resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties.<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
Utilization of commercial rice varieties possessing pest resist<strong>an</strong>ce for<br />
effective <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> economic m<strong>an</strong>agement of insect pests has helped to<br />
stabilize rice production. Multiple pest damage <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> continuous<br />
emergence of new pest or biotype/pathotype problems have been<br />
posing new challenges to the ongoing crop improvement efforts. Further<br />
efforts are needed to breed multiple pest-resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties with<br />
polygenic background to confer wide-r<strong>an</strong>ge resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Ecological<br />
underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing of the pest population structure helps in developing<br />
suitable deployment strategies for achieving durable resist<strong>an</strong>ce. A large<br />
proportion of the idéntified sources of resist<strong>an</strong>ce still remains unutilized.<br />
Untapped resist<strong>an</strong>t genes available from l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> races <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> wild accessions<br />
are yet to be explored. Cellular <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> molecular techniques also offer a<br />
wide r<strong>an</strong>ge of novel me<strong>an</strong>s to enrich the existing resource base. Utilizing<br />
pest-resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties as the core^ area-specific IPM programs could be<br />
developed. Thus there is ample scope for developing multiple-resist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
varieties with polygenic background to meet the new challenges of the<br />
next millenium.<br />
References<br />
Adhikari, T.B., Veeracruz, C.M., Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q., Nelson, R.J., Skinner, D.Z., Mew, T.W. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Leech,<br />
J,E. 1995. Genetic diversity of X<strong>an</strong>thomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in Asia. App/. Environ.<br />
Microbiol. 61; 966-971.<br />
Ahn, S.W. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mulekar, A, 1986. <strong>Rice</strong> blast m<strong>an</strong>agement under upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> conditions In:<br />
Progress in Upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 363-374.<br />
Alam, S.N. 1997. Durability <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic basis of resist<strong>an</strong>ce of rice variety IR64 to brown<br />
pi<strong>an</strong>thopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stál). Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Philippines, Los Baños, Philippines,<br />
Baqui, M.A, 1990. Varietal preference of rice brown pi<strong>an</strong>thopper Nilaparavata lugens (Stál)<br />
(Homoptera; Delphacidae). B<strong>an</strong>gladesh /. Zoo/. 18:119-121.
A.P.K. Reddy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> J.S. Bentur 163<br />
Bennett J-, Cohen, M,B., Katiyar, S.K. Ghareyazie, B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S, 1997. Enh<strong>an</strong>cing insect<br />
resistnacein rice through biotechnology. In: Adv<strong>an</strong>ce^ in Insect Control; Role ofTr<strong>an</strong>sgenic<br />
N.B. Carozzi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> M.G. Koziel, (eds.). Taylor <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fr<strong>an</strong>cis, London, pp. 79-93.<br />
Bentur, J.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kalode, M.B. 1996. Hypersensitive reaction <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> induced resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice<br />
against Asi<strong>an</strong> rice gall midge Orseolia oryzae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 78: 77-81,<br />
Bentur, M.B., Srinavasn, T.E. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kalode, M.B, 1987. Occurrence of a virulent of rice gall<br />
midge (GM) Orseolia oryzae Wood-Mason biotype (?) in Andhra Pradesh, India. Inti. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Res. Newslett, 12; 33-34.<br />
Bonm<strong>an</strong>, J,M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mackill, D.J. 1988. Durable resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice. Oryza 25:103-110.<br />
Borun<strong>an</strong>, J.M., Khush, G.S, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nelson, R.J. 1992. Breeding rice for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to pests. Ann.<br />
Rev, Phytopathol. 30: 507-528..<br />
Brar, D.S, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1991. Genetics ofresist<strong>an</strong>ce to insects in crop pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Adv<strong>an</strong>ces<br />
Agron. 45: 223-274.<br />
Brar, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1995. Wide hybridization for enh<strong>an</strong>cing resist<strong>an</strong>ce to biotic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
abiotic stresses in rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice. Rroc. Inti. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Conf. Feb. 13-17,1995.<br />
Carozzi, N.B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Koziel, M.G. 1997. Adv<strong>an</strong>ces in Insect Control: Role of Tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic Pl<strong>an</strong>ts.<br />
Taylor <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fr<strong>an</strong>cis, London.<br />
Chaudhary, B.F., Srivastava, P.S., Shrivastava, M.N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1985. Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce of gall midge in some rice cultivara of rice. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics. IRRI, Los Baños,<br />
Philippines, pp. 523-527.<br />
Cheng, X,, Sard<strong>an</strong>a, S., Kapl<strong>an</strong>, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Altosaar, 1 .1998. Agrobacterium-tr<strong>an</strong>sformed rice<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts expressing synthetic cryIA(b) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cryIA(c) genes are highly toxic to striped stem<br />
borer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yellow stem borer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:2767-2772.<br />
Cohen, M.B., Alam, S.N., Medina, E.B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bernal, C.C. 1997. Brownpl<strong>an</strong>thopper,Ní7flpflttJ«ffl<br />
lugens, resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice cultivar IR64: mech<strong>an</strong>ism <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> role in successful N. lugens<br />
m<strong>an</strong>agement in Central Luzon, Philippines. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 85:221-229.<br />
Crill, J.P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1982. Effective <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stable control of rice blast with monogenic<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce. In: Evolution of the Gene Rotation Concept for <strong>Rice</strong> Blast Control. IRRI, Los Baños,<br />
Philippines, pp. 87-102.<br />
Dakshay<strong>an</strong>i, K., Bentur, J.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kalode, M.B. 1993. Nature of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice varieties<br />
against leaffolder Cnaphalocrods medinalis (Guenee). Insect Sci. Applic. 14:107-114.<br />
Datta, S.K., Quimo, C., Torrizo, L., Datta, K., Alam, M.F., Abrigo, E., Oilvia, N., Alejar, M.,<br />
Biswas, S., Muthukrishn<strong>an</strong>, S., Potrykus, I., Sellar, T., Mew, M.W. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1996.<br />
Genetic engineering for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to sheath blight <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other agronomic characters. In:<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Genetics III. IRRI Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 785-791.<br />
Desai, B.D. 1987. Operational <strong>research</strong> projects: constraints <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> achievements. Annu. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Workshop, Patna, India (mimeo).<br />
Directorate of <strong>Rice</strong> Research (DRR) 1992. Progress report of the AICRIP Kharif 1992, vol. 2.<br />
Directorate of <strong>Rice</strong> Research, Hyderabad, India.<br />
Du<strong>an</strong>, X-, Li, X., Xuc, Q., Abo-El-Saad, Xu, D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Wu, R. 1996. Tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts<br />
harboring <strong>an</strong> introduced potato proteinase inhibitor II gene are insect resist<strong>an</strong>t. Nature<br />
Biotechn. 14; 494-498.<br />
Bzuka, A. 1979. Breeding for <strong>genetics</strong> of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Jap<strong>an</strong>. In: Proc. <strong>Rice</strong> Blast Workshop.<br />
IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 27-40,<br />
Fern<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>es, G.W. 1990. Hypersensitivity: A neglected pl<strong>an</strong>t resist<strong>an</strong>ce mech<strong>an</strong>ism against<br />
insect herbivores. Environ. Entomol. 19; 1173-1182.<br />
Fujimoto, H„ Itoh, K., Yamamoto, M., Kyozuka, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shimamoto, K. 1993. Insect resist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
rice generated by modified delta endotoxin gene of Bacillus thuringiensis. Bio techn. 11:<br />
1151-1155.
164 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
George, M.L.C., Cruz, W.T., Leach, J.E. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nelson, R.J. 1997. Movement of X<strong>an</strong>thomonas<br />
oryzae in Southeast Asia detected using PCR based DNA fingerprinting. Phytopath. 87:<br />
302-309.<br />
Ghareyazie, B., Alinia, P., Menguito, C.A., Rubia, L.G., dePamla, J.M., Liw<strong>an</strong>ag, E.A., Cohen,<br />
M. B., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bennett, J. 1997. Enh<strong>an</strong>ced resist<strong>an</strong>ce to two stem borers in <strong>an</strong><br />
aromatic rice containing a synthetic crylA(b) gene. Molec. Breed. 3:401-414.<br />
Hibino, H., Tiongco, E.R., Cabin<strong>an</strong>agow, R.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Florez, Z.M. 1987. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to rice<br />
tungro associated viruses in rice under experimental <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> natural conditions. Phytopath.<br />
77; 871-875.<br />
Hopkins, R.M. 1991. Feeding behaviour of the brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper (BPH) on susceptible <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t rice cultivars. Jnt. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newslett. 16{6): 10.<br />
Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N., Angeles, E.R., Domingo, J., Magp<strong>an</strong>tay, G,, Sing, S., Zh<strong>an</strong>g, G., Kumara Vaditel,<br />
N. , Bennettl, f, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1997, Pyramiding of bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes in<br />
rice; marker assisted selection using RFLP <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> PGR. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:313-320.<br />
International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (IRRI) 1996. Annual Report for 1995. IRRI, Los Baños,<br />
Philippines.<br />
Irie, K-, Hoypyama, H., Takeuchi, T., Iwabuchi, K., Wat<strong>an</strong>abe, H., Abe, M., Abe, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Arai,<br />
S. 1996. Tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic rice established to express com cystatin exhibits strong inhibitory<br />
activity agáinst insect gut proteases. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Molec. Biol, 30:149-157.<br />
Jena, K..K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1987. Introgression of genes fromOrt/za officinalis Wall et Watt, to<br />
cultivated rice O. sativa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80; 737-7^5.<br />
Johnson, R. 1981. Durable resist<strong>an</strong>ce: Definition of genetic control <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> attainment in pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
<strong>breeding</strong>. Phytopath. 71; 567.<br />
Kalode, M.B. 1983. Leafhopper <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>thopper pests of rice in India. In: Inti. Workshop on<br />
Leafhoppers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pl<strong>an</strong>thoppers of Economic Import<strong>an</strong>ce. W.J. Kright, N.C. P<strong>an</strong>t, T.S. Robertson,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> M.R. Vilson (eds.). Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, London, pp. 225-245.<br />
Kalode, M.B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Krishnáiah, K. 1991. Integrated pest m<strong>an</strong>agement in rice. Indi<strong>an</strong> /. Pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
Protect. 19; 117-132,<br />
Kalode, M.B., Trishna, T.S., Pophaly, D,J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Laxminaray<strong>an</strong>a, A. 1977, Note on new multiple<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t donors to major insect pests of rice. Indi<strong>an</strong> /. Agrie. Sei. 47(12) 626; 627.<br />
Katiyar, S.K., T<strong>an</strong>, Y., Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Y., Hu<strong>an</strong>g, B,, Xu, Y., Zhao, L., Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N., Khush, G.S, atvd<br />
Bennett, J. 1995. Molecular tagging of gall midge resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes in rice. In: Fragile Lives<br />
in Fragile Ecosystems. IRRI Los Baños, Philippines, pp: 935-948.<br />
Kenmore, P.E, 1980. Ecology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> outbreaks of a tropical insect pest of the green revolutionthe<br />
rice brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper Nilaparvata lugens (Stäl). Ph.D. thesis, Univ. California,<br />
Berkeley.<br />
Kiyosawa, S. 1972. Genetics of blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce. In; <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines.<br />
Kiyosawa, S. 1977. Genetics of blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding, IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines,<br />
pp. 203-225.<br />
Kiyosawa, S. 1981. Gene <strong>an</strong>alysis for blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Oryza 18:196-203.<br />
Kloti, A. J., Fuherer, R., Terada, S., Wurm, J,, Burkhardt, P.K., Chen, G., Höhn, Th., Ghosh, G.C.<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Potrykus, 1.1996, Toward genetically engineered resist<strong>an</strong>ce to tungro virus. In: <strong>Rice</strong><br />
. Genetics III, IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 763-767.<br />
Krishnaiah, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reddy, P.C, 1989. Operational <strong>research</strong> project on integrated control of<br />
rice pests in Medchal area of R<strong>an</strong>ga Reddy district of Andhra Pradesh. Ann. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Workshop, Hissar, India (mimeo).<br />
Lee, E.J,, Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mew, T.W, 1989. Durable resist<strong>an</strong>ce to rice diseases in irrigated<br />
environments. In: Progress in Irrigated <strong>Rice</strong> Research. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp.<br />
93-110.
A.P.K. Reddy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> J,S. Bentur 165<br />
Leong, S.A., Farm<strong>an</strong>, M., Smith, J,, Budda, A., Tora, Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nitla, 1994. Molecular genetic<br />
approach to the study of cultivar specificity in the rice blast fungus. In; <strong>Rice</strong> B/ast Disease.<br />
R. S. Zeigler, S.A. Leong, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P.S. Teng, (eds.). Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 87-110.<br />
Marchetti, M.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bonm<strong>an</strong>, J.M. 1989. <strong>Rice</strong> blast disease m<strong>an</strong>agement. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Farming<br />
Systems: New Direciiofxs. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 175-183.<br />
Marchetti, M.A., Lai, X.H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bollach, C.N. 1987. Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to Pyricularia<br />
oryzae in rice cultivars grown in United States, Phytopath. 77: 799-804.<br />
Mishra, N.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Misra, B.C. 1991. Orientation of white backed pl<strong>an</strong>thopper, SogatdU<br />
furcifera (Horvath) towards some rice varieties. Indi<strong>an</strong> }. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Profeci. 19:179-181.<br />
Nayak, P., Basu, D., Das, S., Basu, A., Ghosh, D., Ramakrishn<strong>an</strong>, N.A., Ghosh, M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sen,<br />
S. K. 1997. Tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic elite indica pl<strong>an</strong>ts expressing CrylAc 5-endotoxin of BíícíVíms<br />
thuringiensis are resist<strong>an</strong>t against yellow stem borer (Scirpophaga incertuks). Proc. Natl.<br />
Acad. Sci. USA, 94; 2111-2116.<br />
Nottenghem, J.L. 1985. Blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce methodologies in the Ivory Coast, 1972-1985. In:<br />
Progress in Upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 305-316.<br />
Ogawa, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1989. Major genes to bacterial blight in rice. In: Bacterial Blight of<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 177-192.<br />
Ou, S.H. 1985, <strong>Rice</strong> Diseases. Commonwealth Institute of Mycology, Kew, Engl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>.<br />
Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong>, S.Y. 1965. Breeding for blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce in India. In: The <strong>Rice</strong> Blast Disease of<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD, USA, pp. 343-359.<br />
P<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Heinrichs, E.A. 1983. Levels of toler<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>tibiosis in rice varieties<br />
having moderate resist<strong>an</strong>ce to the brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stál)<br />
(Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Environ-. Entomol. 12; 1204-1214.<br />
P<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1995. Host Pl<strong>an</strong>t Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to Insects. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CAB International, Oxon, UK,<br />
Pathak, M.D. 1969. Stem borer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leafhopper-pl<strong>an</strong>thopper resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice varieties.<br />
Entomol. Exp. Appl. 12: 789-800.<br />
Purushotham<strong>an</strong>, D. 1975, Ch<strong>an</strong>ges in phenolic compounds in rice varieties as influenced by<br />
X<strong>an</strong>thom<strong>an</strong>as oryzae infection. <strong>Rice</strong>, 25:85-89.<br />
Ramach<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>r<strong>an</strong>, R, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kh<strong>an</strong>, Z.R. 1991. Mech<strong>an</strong>isms of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in wild rice Oryz«<br />
brachy<strong>an</strong>tha to rice leaffolder Ciiap/w/ocracis medinalis (Guenee) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).<br />
/. Chem. Ecol. 17:41-65.<br />
Ramaraju, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Babu, P.C.S. 1990. Growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> development of whitebacked pl<strong>an</strong>thopper<br />
{Sogatelkfurcifera) on rice (Oryza sativa). Indi<strong>an</strong> /. Agrie. Sci. 60:249-251.<br />
Rao, Y.S., Israel, P., Yadava, C.P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Roy, J.K. 1971. Nature of gall midge resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice,<br />
Curr. Sci. 40:497-498.<br />
Reddy, A.P.K. 1993. Ch<strong>an</strong>ging scenario: rice diseases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their m<strong>an</strong>agement. In: Pest <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Disease M<strong>an</strong>agement in India-The Ch<strong>an</strong>ging Scenario. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Protection Assoc. India,<br />
Hyderabad, India, pp. 121-125.<br />
Reddy, A.P.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reddy, P.C. 1993. Integrated disease m<strong>an</strong>agement in rice. In: Pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
Protection <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Environment. D.V.R. Reddy, H.C. Sharma, T.B. Gour, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> B.J. Divakar,<br />
(eds.). Pl<strong>an</strong>t Protection Assoc. India, Hyderabad, India, pp. 239-259.<br />
Reddy, A.P.K., Miah, S.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mew, T.W. 1986. Disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice.<br />
In; Progress in Rainfed Lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong>. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 253-262.<br />
Reddy, A.V., Rao, U.P., Siddiq, E.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bentur, J,S, 1997 Genetics of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to rice gall<br />
midge (Orseolia oryzae). Indi<strong>an</strong> }. Genet Pl<strong>an</strong>t Breed. 57:361-372.<br />
Reddy, P.R., Nayak P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sridhar, R. 1997. Physiology of bacterial leaf blight of rice:<br />
Influence of light intensity on some biochemical ch<strong>an</strong>ges associated with disease<br />
development. Indi<strong>an</strong> Phytopathol. 30:51-54.
Ti<br />
166 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>'Challenges<br />
/íl<br />
Ronald, P.C., Holtein, T., Scambray, J., Song, W., W<strong>an</strong>g, G. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> William, C. 1994. Molecular<br />
genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis of the rice bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce locus. Xa2I. In; Blast Disease of <strong>Rice</strong>.<br />
R.S. Zeigler, S.A, Leong, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P.S. Teng, (eds.). Los Baños, Philippines, 187-194.<br />
Roy, J.K., Israel, P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P<strong>an</strong> war, M.S. 1969. Breeding for insect resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice. Oryza 6:38-<br />
44.<br />
Sain, M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kalode, M.B. 1994. Greenhouse evaluation of rice cultivars for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to gall<br />
midge, Orseolia oryzae (Wood-Mason) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> studies on mech<strong>an</strong>isms of resist<strong>an</strong>ce, insect Set.<br />
Appl. 15: 67-74.<br />
Seetharam<strong>an</strong>, R., Prasad, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Anj<strong>an</strong>eyulu, A. 1976. Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to tungro<br />
disease. Indi<strong>an</strong>/. Genet. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Breed. 36:34-36.<br />
Shahjah<strong>an</strong>, M., Imbe, T., Jal<strong>an</strong>i, B.S., Zakri, A.H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Othm<strong>an</strong>, O. 1991. Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce to rice tungro virus in rice {Oryza sativa L.). In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics II. IRRI, Los Baños,<br />
Philippines, pp. 247-254,<br />
Shastri, S.V.S., John, V.T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Seshu, D.V. 1972. Breeding for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to rice tungro in<br />
India. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 239-252,<br />
Shivam<strong>an</strong>i, E . , Shen, P., Ong, C .A., Hamidah, G., Has<strong>an</strong>, G., Mohamad Senawi, M.T., Beachy,<br />
R.N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fauquet, C.M, 1996. Biological screening <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>alysis of tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic rice lines<br />
expressing coat protein genes of rice tungro spherical virus. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics III. IRRI,<br />
M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp .768-772.<br />
Sridhar, R., Nayak, M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kumar, S. 1990. Physiology of disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice blast<br />
fungus. In; Extended Summary-Proc. Inti. Symp. <strong>Rice</strong> Research; New Frontiers.<br />
Directorate of <strong>Rice</strong> Research, Hyderabad, India, 221 pp,<br />
Srivastava, M.N., Kumar, A., Shrivastava, S.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sahu, R.K. 1994. A new gene for gall<br />
midge resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Neivslett, 10: 79-80.<br />
Sudhakar, G.K., Singh, R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mishra, S.B. 1991. Susceptibility of rice varieties of different<br />
duration to rice leaffolder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guen. Evaluated under varied l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
situations,/, Entomol,/Ies. 15: 79-87.<br />
Thompson, J.N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pellmyr, O. 1991. Evolution of oviposition behaviour <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> host<br />
preferences in Lepidoptera. Ann. Rev. Entomol, 36:65-89,<br />
Toriyama, K, 1975. Recent progress of studies on horizontal resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice <strong>breeding</strong> for<br />
blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Jap<strong>an</strong>. In; Horizontal Resisfimee to Blast Disease of <strong>Rice</strong>. CIAT, Cai,<br />
Colombia, pp. 65-100,<br />
Upadhyaya, N.M., Ram, K,, Y<strong>an</strong>g, M., Kosiratno, W. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Waterhouse, P.M. 1996. <strong>Rice</strong> ragged<br />
stunt virus synthetic resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica rice tr<strong>an</strong>sformation. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics<br />
III, IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 773-779.<br />
V<strong>an</strong> der Pl<strong>an</strong>k, J.E. 1968. Disease Resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Acad. Press, NY.<br />
Velusamy, R. 1991. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce of <strong>breeding</strong> lines derived from Oryza officinalis to brown<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>thopper (BPH). iui. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Neu/slell. 16(1): 14.<br />
Visw<strong>an</strong>ath<strong>an</strong>, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kalode, M.B. 1990.. Biochemical aspects of varietal resist<strong>an</strong>ce to green<br />
leafhoppers, Nephotettix virescens (Dist<strong>an</strong>t) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nephotettix nigropictus (Stál). Proc. Indi<strong>an</strong><br />
Acad. Sci., Anim. Sci, 99; 57-66,<br />
Wu, C., F<strong>an</strong>, Y., Zh<strong>an</strong>g, C,, Oliva, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Datta, S.K. 1997. Tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic fertile japónica rice<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts expressing a modified cry lA(b) gene resist<strong>an</strong>t to yellow stem borer. Pi<strong>an</strong>f Cell Rep.<br />
17; 129-132.<br />
Wünn, J.f Kloti, A., Burkhardt, P.K., Ghosh Biswas, G.C., Launis, K., Iglesias, V. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Potrykus,<br />
I. 1996. Tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic indica rice <strong>breeding</strong> line IR58 expressing a synthetic cryIA(b) gene<br />
from Bacillus thuringlensis provide effective insect pest control. Bio tech. 14:171-176.<br />
Xu, D., Xue, Q., McElory, D., Mawal, Y., Hilder, V.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Wu, R. 1996. Constitutive<br />
expression of a cowpea trypsin inhibitor gene Cp Ti in tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts confers<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce to two major rice insect pests. Mol. Breed. 2:186-193.
A.P.K. Reddy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> J.S. Bentur 167<br />
Yashitola, I., Kkrishnaveni, D., Reddy, A.P.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sonti, R. 1997. Genetic diversity within a<br />
population of X<strong>an</strong>thomonas oryzae pv oryzae in India. Phytopath. 87: 765-775.<br />
Ye, Z.H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Saxena, R.C. 1990. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to whitebacked pl<strong>an</strong>thopper in elite lines of<br />
cultivated x wild rice crosses. Crop Sci. 30:1178-1182.<br />
Yeh, W.J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bonm<strong>an</strong>, J.M. 1986. Assessment of partial resist<strong>an</strong>ce toPyricukria Oryzae in six<br />
rice cultivars. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Pathol. 35:319-323.<br />
Yu, X.P., Wu, G.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hu, C. 1990. Studies on toler<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>itbiosis nature of rice<br />
varieties to whitebacked pl<strong>an</strong>thopper. Acta Phytophylactica Sínica 17:327-330.<br />
Zeigler, R.S., Thomas, Nelson, R.J., Levy, M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Correa Victoria, F.J. 1994. Lineage<br />
exclusion: A proposal for linking blast population <strong>an</strong>alysis to resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>breeding</strong>. In: <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Blast Disease, R.S. Zeigler, S.A. Leong, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P.S. Teng, (eds.). IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines.<br />
Zh<strong>an</strong>g, G., Angeles, E.R., Abenes, M.L.P., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N. 1996. RAPD <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> RFLP<br />
mapping for the bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes Xa 13 in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93:65-<br />
70.
Breeding <strong>Rice</strong> for Resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
to Diseases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Insect Pests<br />
Ram C. Chaudhary*'<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> has been under cultivation for over thous<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s of years <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in 115<br />
countries. As a result, it has become a host for a number of diseases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
insect pests, 54 in temperate zone, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> about 500 in tropical countries<br />
(Swaminath<strong>an</strong>, 1979). Of the major diseases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pests, 45 are fungal,<br />
10 bacterial, 15 viral (Ou, 1985), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 75 insect pests <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nematodes.<br />
DISEASES<br />
The major fungal diseases of rice are blast, sheath blight, brown spot,<br />
narrow brown leaf spot, sheath rot <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leaf scald. Ten major bacterial<br />
diseases have been identified in rice ({IRRI, 1969; Ling, 1972; Ou, 1985;<br />
Goto, 1979, 1988). The bacterial diseases, which cause serious economic<br />
losses in rice-growing countries are bacterial blight, bacterial leaf streak,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bacterial sheath rot. Twelve viral diseases of rice have been<br />
identified but the import<strong>an</strong>t ones are tungro, grassy stunt, ragged stunt,<br />
or<strong>an</strong>ge leaf (in Asia), hoja bl<strong>an</strong>ca (America), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stripe <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> dwarf (in<br />
temperate Asia).<br />
* Ex~Global Co-ordinator INGER, International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, Philippines;<br />
Chairm<strong>an</strong>, Participatory Rural Development Foundation, Gorakhpur 273014, India,
170 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Blast<br />
HIM<br />
'1.<br />
Blast disease of rice caused by the fungus Magnaporthe grísea (<strong>an</strong>amorph^.<br />
Pyricularia grísea) is the most destructive one. It has been reported from<br />
almost all rice-growing countries of the world. The fungus c<strong>an</strong> infect the<br />
rice pl<strong>an</strong>t at <strong>an</strong>y growth stage. Typical leaf lesions of leaf blast or foliar<br />
blast are spindle-shaped. Large lesions (1.5 cm x 0.5 cm) usually develop<br />
gray centers. The lesions collapse <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leaves of the susceptible varieties<br />
may be killed. Pinhead-size brown lesions, indicating resist<strong>an</strong>t reaction,<br />
may be confused with the symptoms of brown spot. The fungus may<br />
also attack the stem at the nodes, node blast, in which the stem bends<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> breaks at the nodes causing complete spikelet sterility. The fungus<br />
may also attack the last internode, neck blast, causing partial to complete<br />
sterility.<br />
G enetics<br />
Leaf blast<br />
Chaudhary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nayak (1987) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G<strong>an</strong>gopadhyay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong><br />
(1987) have reviewed the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of leaf blast. Goto (1978) observed<br />
a decline in resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Ginga, a lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> variety <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> descend<strong>an</strong>t of<br />
Sensho. Sensho, <strong>an</strong> upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> variety possessed a high degree of blast<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce with Rbl, Rb2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rb3 genes, but Lazy Ginga, La-isogenic<br />
line of Ginga, proved that Rbl of Sensho had not been introduced to<br />
Ginga. Absence of Rbl caused a signific<strong>an</strong>t decline in blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce of<br />
Ginga. The two blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes, which controlled a moderate level<br />
of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Ginga, were assumed to be multiple alleles or the two<br />
genes other th<strong>an</strong> Rbl of Sensho.<br />
Kiyosawa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cho (1980) made a detailed study of blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
in Tongil. The cross of Palkweng/Tongil in F3 showed segregation,<br />
which could be explained by the two or more genes against seven fungal<br />
strains, which had been used as differential strains in Jap<strong>an</strong>. The tests of<br />
hybrids of Tongil with Kiyosawa^s differential varieties indicated that at<br />
least two of these genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce were Pi-a Pi-b. The test of Tongil<br />
with fungus mut<strong>an</strong>ts.supported the presence of two genes.<br />
Kiyosawa (1981) put forth the concept of gene-for-gene for blast<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Palkweng-Tongil against Ina-72 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ina-72+ races. The<br />
possibility of application of the gene-for-gene concept to the hostpathogen<br />
relationship of rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice blast system was confirmed<br />
through gene <strong>an</strong>alyses in Jap<strong>an</strong>ese rice varieties. According to the genefor-gene<br />
concept in blast, resist<strong>an</strong>ce to virulent isolates of P. grísea finds a<br />
susceptible genotype in the resist<strong>an</strong>t cross but not in the resist<strong>an</strong>t parent.<br />
It was also found that when the parents are resist<strong>an</strong>t to <strong>an</strong> isolate, their<br />
descend<strong>an</strong>ts become susceptible to the same isolate (Goto, 1978). Ginga,
Ram C. Chaudhary 171<br />
a descen<strong>an</strong>t variety of Sensho <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fukunishiki^ parental cultivar Zenith,<br />
was found susceptible to some races of P. grísea whereas their parents<br />
showed resist<strong>an</strong>ce. The authors concluded that the resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene linked<br />
with a marker could not be inherited, so the descendahts failed to retain<br />
the resist<strong>an</strong>ce as in their parents.<br />
Kiyosawa et al. (1983) developed mathematical models to study the<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene frequencies in each prefecture of Jap<strong>an</strong>. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />
blast disease between a hybrid Fukunishiki <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its parental cultivar<br />
Zenith was found to be different (Goto, 1976). Both varieties carried the<br />
major gene Pi-z but Fukunishiki had one recessive gene <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zenith had<br />
the modifier Rb6 to the blast strain Ken-53-33, Rb6 , the modifier gene of<br />
Pi-z in Zenith, gave effective control for isolates Fuku 67-57 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ken-53-<br />
33 while Fukunishiki, the derivative of Zenith could not possess Rb6 . It<br />
was also formd to be less resist<strong>an</strong>t th<strong>an</strong> Zenith. Kiyosawa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yabuki<br />
(1976) observed the presence of Av-a, Av-k'*’, Av-a'^, Av-k <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Av-a^,<br />
Av-k genes, but not Av-a Av-k gene in K<strong>an</strong>agawa Prefecture, Jap<strong>an</strong><br />
where Pi-a+ Pi-k, Bi-a Pi-k+ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-a Pi-k+ varieties were grown. The<br />
authors developed a model on the race frequency ch<strong>an</strong>ge in a hostpopulation<br />
system with genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> avirulence gene for<br />
host. They assumed genotypes of true resist<strong>an</strong>ce, Ab, A+, +B, ++, in a<br />
host population <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> four genotypes (races) for avirulence, ab, a+, +b<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tt in <strong>an</strong> airborne pathogen population. They established equations<br />
following the rate of frequency ch<strong>an</strong>ges on a given, host population. In<br />
this case, A <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> B were resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes while a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> b were avirulence<br />
genes which specifically corresponded to the respective resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes.<br />
Kiyosawa (1981) studied the race frequencies of pathogens or<br />
virulence <strong>an</strong>alysis in blast fungus by computer simulation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
theoretical equations. The ratios between the observed value to the<br />
expected value of the fungus genot5rpe Av-i Av-k+ (abbreviated "tt"<br />
genotype ratio) for virulence was calculated. The "tt" genotype ratios<br />
were higher in different districts of Jap<strong>an</strong> for all the ten years. The "tt"<br />
genotype frequencies showed decreasing values with decrease of<br />
individual virulence genes. The ch<strong>an</strong>ge in frequencies of the "tt"<br />
genotype (race) could not be explained by simple directional or<br />
stabilizing selections. The "tt" genotype ratio returned to one even after<br />
directional <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>/or stabilizing selections <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that limited use of virulence<br />
(v) gene <strong>an</strong>alysis to search for the causes of the ch<strong>an</strong>ge in pathogen<br />
geirotype (race) frequencies.<br />
Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong> (1965) studied the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of leaf blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
in the cross Co. 13 Co. 25 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its reciprocal. They found the resist<strong>an</strong>ce in<br />
Co. 25 to be controlled by three genes along with modifiers. Rath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong> (1972) reported the presence of one independent<br />
domin<strong>an</strong>t gene in Zenith <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tetep against race lA-II <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ID-I <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one
172 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
domin<strong>an</strong>t gene in Ginga <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Norin to the race lA-II. Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
his colleagues (Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong>^ 1974) did a detailed study using two<br />
races, viz. IDl <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IC17 of P, grísea, 16 crosses with IDl <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 8 crosses<br />
with IC17. The was resist<strong>an</strong>t in crosses involving the resist<strong>an</strong>t parents.<br />
Zenith S 67, Tetep <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Taduk<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> susceptible parents, Co 13.<br />
However, in the cross Cl 5309 (S) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S 67 (R), the Fj was resist<strong>an</strong>t to<br />
race IC 17. Fj was susceptible when tested against IDl. Against race IC<br />
17, the cross involving Cl 5309 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zenith revealed that the inhibitory<br />
gene in Cl 5309 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zenith was selective in action <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> expressed itself<br />
only with some races of P, grísea, confirming the earlier findings of Rath<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong> (1972). Studies with F2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> F3 showed that the<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce of Tetep, Taduk<strong>an</strong>, Zenith to the races IC17 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IDl was<br />
governed by three pairs of domin<strong>an</strong>t genes of which <strong>an</strong>y two could<br />
confer resist<strong>an</strong>ce to the varieties. The three genes might be the same or<br />
allelic in the varieties. The resist<strong>an</strong>ce of S 67 to race IC 17 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ID 1 was<br />
governed by two pairs of domin<strong>an</strong>t complementary genes which were<br />
also present in Zenith but not expressed tmder predisposing conditions<br />
of high fertility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> low night-temperature. The variety Cl 5309<br />
appeared to have four pairs of genes including one pair of inhibitory<br />
genes which inhibited the resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene of Zenith, Tetep, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Taduk<strong>an</strong><br />
with respect to IC 17 of P. grísea. The variety BJl might possess general<br />
or field resist<strong>an</strong>ce governed by polygenes. Based on these studies, the<br />
genetic constitution of the varieties to race IC17 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ID 1 of P. grísea<br />
were designated as: Zenith (Pi-za, Pi-zb, Pi-zc), Tetep (Pi-za, Pi-zb, Pizc),<br />
Taduk<strong>an</strong> (Pi-za, Pi-zb, Pi-zc), S 67 (Pi-za, Pi-zb or Pi-zc), BJ 1 (Pi-za,<br />
Pi-zb or Pi-zc), Cl 5309 (Pi-za, Pi-zb, Pi-zc (IP 1-z), Co. 13 (Pi-za, Pi-zb,<br />
Pi-zc (IP 1 -z).<br />
The genetic constituents of rice varieties for blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce has been<br />
estimated by utilizing Jap<strong>an</strong>ese cultivars <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-k, Pi-a, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-z <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pik,<br />
Pi-ta <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-ta2 resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes in Tetep, Zenith, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Taduk<strong>an</strong><br />
respectively have been assumed. But Moh<strong>an</strong>ty <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G<strong>an</strong>gopadhyay<br />
(1982) observed digenic blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Zenith Taduk<strong>an</strong>, while<br />
monogenic resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Tetep to Cl isolated from F2 population to their<br />
crosses with Ratna, Karuna <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Co. 13. Tetep, Zenith <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Taduk<strong>an</strong><br />
possess one, two, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> three genes respectively for blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce to C3<br />
isolate of P. grísea.<br />
Methods for Gene Analysis<br />
The Mendeli<strong>an</strong> ratio method of gene <strong>an</strong>alysis is followed in most<br />
countries. In this method, usually one resist<strong>an</strong>t variety belonging to a<br />
particular group is crossed with a susceptible variety <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the F2 hybrids<br />
are artificially inoculated with a fungus strain. The pattern of resist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> susceptible ratio showed the gene involved resist<strong>an</strong>ce. F3 seedlings<br />
consisting of resist<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> susceptible progenies were raised in rows
Ram C. Chaudhary 173<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tested against separate fungus strains. When all the pl<strong>an</strong>ts in the F3<br />
lines showed resist<strong>an</strong>t reactions to one fungus strain^ it was concluded<br />
that the same resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene controlled the resist<strong>an</strong>ce against the two<br />
fungus strains. Different reactions of some lines to the two fungus<br />
strains indicated participation of different genes in the process.<br />
Kiyosawa (1976,1978) devised the frequency distribution curve method<br />
in order to avoid the great deal of labour required in gene- <strong>an</strong>alysis<br />
through hybridization.<br />
Qu<strong>an</strong>titative Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Rath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong> (1972) in their genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis of the penetration<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> establishment phases of the disease reaction concluded that during<br />
the penetration phase field resist<strong>an</strong>ce was controlled by a polygene with<br />
few loci. Using the sheath inoculation technique, Kaur et al. (1984)<br />
reported that penetaration <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong> establishment phase was governed by<br />
polygenes, while resist<strong>an</strong>ce to spread of infection in the host was<br />
governed by major genes. Takahashi (1965) proposed a working<br />
hypothesis to explain the relationship between gene action <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
expression of resist<strong>an</strong>ce for the rice blast disease <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> indicated that (a)<br />
there were several pairs of genes controlling blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice<br />
varieties^ (b) there were races of pathogen specific in their host reaction,<br />
(c) fewer fungal races were associated with high degree of resist<strong>an</strong>ce, (d)<br />
a susceptible host cell permitted symbiotic mycelial growth for a fairly<br />
long period while a resist<strong>an</strong>t cell inhibited it by a hypersensitive<br />
reaction, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> (e) mycelial growth was inhibited in the infected cells of<br />
the host due to some factors resulting from the host-parasite interaction.<br />
Qu<strong>an</strong>titative <strong>an</strong>alysis of the lesion type demonstrated distinct<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce/susceptible reactions in the parents involved; the me<strong>an</strong> value<br />
of the F2 progenies of the different crosses were closer to the parental<br />
values rather th<strong>an</strong> the corresponding mid-parental values. This<br />
suggested that major genes might be responsible for this phase of disease<br />
reaction. Qu<strong>an</strong>titative estimations for the lesion number showed that the<br />
variety Tetep was highly resist<strong>an</strong>t, Zenith was resist<strong>an</strong>t, wliile the other<br />
five were susceptible to both the races imder study. Me<strong>an</strong> values of F2<br />
populations in most cases were intermediate between the parental<br />
values <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a few were in the extra-parental r<strong>an</strong>ge. This suggested that<br />
the factors controlling lesion number were primarily polygenic.<br />
Hashioka (1950) examined the degree of resist<strong>an</strong>ce on the basis of<br />
lesion types. Takahasi (1965) steered the need for qu<strong>an</strong>titative <strong>an</strong>alysis<br />
to estimate blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> did a critical study on the basis of<br />
number <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> type of lesions, independently <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in combination <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> on<br />
the measurement of the degree of mycelial growth in host cells. He<br />
observed the method based on the degree of mycelial growth in the host<br />
cells to be accurate in estimating resist<strong>an</strong>ce to blast.
174 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Linkages<br />
■ !i ?í<br />
ií.- ■■■ I<br />
Hr<br />
The early variety of Koshihikari <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the late variety Shir<strong>an</strong>ui were<br />
crossed with the testers ER <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> LR which carried alleles of Lm locus for<br />
earliness <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lateness respectively, as well as Pi-z4 for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to P.<br />
grísea (Yokoo <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kikuchi, 1977). Shir<strong>an</strong>ui appeared to carry Lms, which<br />
conferred earlier heading th<strong>an</strong> "Lmti" <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> at <strong>an</strong>other locus, a gene<br />
conferring late maturity th<strong>an</strong> "Lm4". The segregation ratio of early to<br />
late in the F2 of Koshihikari Shir<strong>an</strong>ui was 1:3 as expected from the<br />
contributions of "Lme" <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> "Lms". Yokoo <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kikuchi (1977) also<br />
reported the linkage relation between the heading time <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> blast<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce of seven varieties with early maturing (ER) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a late<br />
maturing lime (LR) carrying Pi-zt for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to P. grísea. "ER" carried<br />
the "Em2" allele for heading time <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the "LR" carried the "Lm ". The<br />
heading time of early varieties was controlled by "Lm " alleles for<br />
lateness. "Lm" was closely linked to Pi-zt. Goto (1976) also showed that<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce to blast of Fukunishiki derived from Zenith was the same as<br />
that of Zenith. Both varieties carried the major gene Pi-z but Fukunishiki<br />
had one recessive gene <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zenith had a modifier, RB6 , to the blast<br />
strain Ken 53-33. Rb6 , the modifier of Pi~z in Zenith, expressed resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
to isolate Fuki 67-57 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ken 53-33, while Fukunishiki without Rb6 was<br />
less resist<strong>an</strong>t th<strong>an</strong> Zenith.<br />
Goto (1978) observed that Ginga, derived from Sensho (<strong>an</strong> upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
variety) which had high blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce with three genes, Rbl, Rb2, Rb3,<br />
did not have Rbl. Rbl gene of Sensho linked with gene la had not been<br />
introduced in Ginga. Goto (1970) followed the sheath inoculation<br />
method <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> found three independent genes, Rbl, Rb2, Rb3, which acted<br />
additively for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to the four isolates belonging to three<br />
international races, IC 1 (Ken 53-33), IG-1 (Hoku-h Hoku 2 ) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IF 1<br />
(Nagasa) in a two-cross combination, Sensho, H 79. tujimaki et al. (1975)<br />
observed eight indica varieties collected from four Asi<strong>an</strong> countries to be<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t to seven differential strains of P. grísea selected by Kiyosawa. A<br />
single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene, Pi-zt, controlled the resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Ken 53-33. This<br />
gene was widely distributed among the indica varieties tested.<br />
Kiyosawa (1972a) tr<strong>an</strong>sferred the resist<strong>an</strong>t gene from indica varieties to<br />
B T 8 , Bl-9, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bl-11. These varieties carried the independent gene Pi-b<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-t. Either of these gene pairs were closely linked to Pi-a, Pi-k, Pi-i,<br />
Pi-ta, Pi-z, Pi-m, or Pi~f.<br />
Yokoo <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kikuchi (1977) made crosses among five varieties that<br />
varied in heading time <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> presence of the Pi-zt allele for resist<strong>an</strong>ce P.<br />
grísea. In the F2 of Fujisaki 5 J315, homozygous resist<strong>an</strong>t pl<strong>an</strong>ts were<br />
mostly late heading, homozygous susceptible pl<strong>an</strong>ts were early heading,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> heterozygous pl<strong>an</strong>ts were mostly intermediate in heading time.<br />
Linkage between heading time <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> resist<strong>an</strong>ce was observed in Norin 8<br />
J315.
n<br />
Ram C. Chaudhary 175<br />
Goto et al. (1981) <strong>an</strong>alyzed the linkage of four genes^ viz. Pi-a, Pi-k,<br />
Pi“Z, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-I <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reported that Pi-a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-k were in rectilinear order in<br />
the 8 th linkage group <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-I <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-z were independent of the first<br />
group. Studies on linkage relationship showed that all the genes for blast<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce found so far belong to the four linkage groups^ "bt^^ "la"<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> "wx". Prom the results obtained in a uniform blast nursery triab<br />
Carreon <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tetep were identified as parents with a broad spectrum of<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce but Carreon proved to be a poor combiner. Progeny of IR 1416 .<br />
(14-400 Tetep) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Progeny of IR 1544 (IR 24 Tetep) have excellent grain<br />
quality of good combining ability <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are resist<strong>an</strong>t to green leafhopper.<br />
M<strong>an</strong>y lines with blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> multiple toler<strong>an</strong>ce to insects <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
diseases were developed. Gompai-15 was used in crosses <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> three<br />
blast resist<strong>an</strong>t lines with multiple toler<strong>an</strong>ce to other diseases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insects<br />
were developed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> named as IR 28, 29 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 34.<br />
According to Li et al. (1983), <strong>an</strong>ther culture was found useful in<br />
introducing Pi-zt gene from Toride 1, Toride 2 into Zhonghua 8 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Zhonghua 9. This could be accomplished within a year while the<br />
backcross method took 12 years. Colour "c" cluster spikelets "cl" <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
white striped "ws" waxy endosperm "wx", brown mottled discoloration<br />
of leaf <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> p<strong>an</strong>icle gold hull "b ll", tri<strong>an</strong>gular hull "ki", Waise-aikoku,<br />
Shirosasa dwarf "dw" (Iwata <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Omura, 1971) were found to be linked<br />
with resist<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />
Kiyosawa (1972b) compiled data on the linkage relationship among<br />
genes for blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other traits in four groups; taking into<br />
consideration all the information available upto that time. Introduction<br />
of useful genes by backcrossing was developed by Fujimaki et al. (1975).<br />
When Pyricularia resist<strong>an</strong>t, photosensitive, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> late flowering indica<br />
varieties were backcrossed as donor parents with susceptible japónica<br />
varieties, resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> days to heading were polygenic in Norin<br />
25/Co. 4, Morak Sappillai/Fujisaka 5 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fujisaka 5/Konotor. In BCj<br />
generation of Norin Tjina <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> four other crosses, segregation for<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce was digenic, while in BC2 it was monogenic or digenic.<br />
Kiyosawa (1968) studied the <strong>genetics</strong> blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce in the Chinese<br />
varieties, To-to type, Chokoto, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Minohakai <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reported the presence<br />
of genes, Pi-a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-k. Michakasi was found to possess <strong>an</strong> additional<br />
gene, Pi-m. No linkage relationship was found between Pi-a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-k,<br />
Pi-a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-m, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-m <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-k. In the Kore<strong>an</strong> variety, Diazichall<br />
(Butamochi), Kiyosawa (1968) found Pi-a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-i genes after testing<br />
against seven fungus strains. The gene Pi-i behaved independently of<br />
the gene Pi-a.<br />
Kiyosawa (1969) studied the <strong>genetics</strong> of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in two varieties,<br />
Shiriniki <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kusabe varieties using the Philippines race Ken ph. 03 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
its mut<strong>an</strong>t Ken ph. Od2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reported the presence of two domin<strong>an</strong>t
176 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce, Pi-k2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-k, in Shiriniki <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kusabe, The gene<br />
Pi-ks was allelic to the gene, Pi-k. Gene pattern for resist<strong>an</strong>ce in the<br />
Pakist<strong>an</strong>i variety Pusur was complex <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> conditioned by three genes<br />
(Kiyosawa, 1968). Of the three genes in the Var. K2 (derivative of Pusur),<br />
two were identical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> or allelic to Pi-k <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-s <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> were designated Pik6<br />
. Thus three genes (Pi-k, Pi-ks <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-kl) of the nine known genes of<br />
Jap<strong>an</strong> were located on one locus.<br />
Analysis of hybrid progenies of HR 22 by Kiyosawa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Murty<br />
(1969) indicated that a gene similar to Pi-k controlled resist<strong>an</strong>ce in five of<br />
the seven strains of P. grísea tested. A derivative from the hybrid HR 22/<br />
Sasashigure was <strong>an</strong>alyzed. The gene for blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce was observed to<br />
be <strong>an</strong> allele of Pi-k <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> was designated Pi-kh.<br />
Nagai et aL (1973) were the first to introduce the variety Toride 1<br />
(Toride is <strong>an</strong> indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica cross with resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene from TKm 1)<br />
of India as a multiracial resist<strong>an</strong>t donor parent. After backcrossing four<br />
times with Norin 8 of Jap<strong>an</strong> as a recurrent parent, they succeeded in<br />
producing the variety TKM 1. This selection proved resist<strong>an</strong>t to most of<br />
the major pathogenic races of the rice blast fungus collected throughout<br />
the country, Yokoo <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kiyosawa (1970) reported that the resist<strong>an</strong>ce in<br />
TKMl was controlled by a domin<strong>an</strong>t gene, designated Pi-zt, which<br />
differed from Pi-k, Pi-i, Pi-ta, Pi-a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their alleles. The resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene<br />
of Toride 1 was allelic to Pi-z of the USA variety Zenith <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> it seemed to<br />
be at a different locus from that of Pi-m.<br />
Blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce of Toride 2, a variety with multiple resist<strong>an</strong>ce, bred<br />
from the hybrid of (Norin 8 Co. 25) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> (Norin 8 ) was <strong>an</strong>alyzed<br />
(Kiyosawa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yokoo, 1970). Toride 2 carried the genes Pi-zt <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-a.<br />
The gene Pi-zt was the same as that found in the variety Toride 1, which<br />
was bred by tr<strong>an</strong>sferring the resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene in the Indi<strong>an</strong> variety TKM 1<br />
to Norin 8 . Following the sheath inoculation technique. Goto (1970)<br />
carried out gene <strong>an</strong>alysis for blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce in two cross combinations,<br />
viz. Sensho H79 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Imochi Shrirazu H9 with four isolates belonging to<br />
three international races, IC-1 (Ken 53-33), IG-1 (Hoku 1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hoku 2 )<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IF-1 (Naga 8 a). Three independent genes, Rbl, Rb2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rb3 acted<br />
additively for conferring resist<strong>an</strong>ce to the four isolates.<br />
Nagai et ah (1973) described in detail the blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce of variety<br />
Toride 1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Toride 2 to seven strains of P. grísea. Toride 1 was found to<br />
carry a new resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene Pi-z+ that was independent of Pi-i, Pi-k, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Pi-ta, but weakly associated with Pi-a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> allelic or closely associated<br />
with Pi-z-I-. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Toride 2 was controlled by Pi-a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-z+.<br />
Kiyosawa (1970) reviewed the resist<strong>an</strong>ce of local <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> exotic varieties for<br />
<strong>genetics</strong> of resist<strong>an</strong>ce of P. grísea. The resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene Pi-a was<br />
universally distributed in the resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties throughout the world.<br />
The locus Pi-k had multiple alleles, Pi-k, Pi-k8 , Pi-kp, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-kh, of
Ram C. Chaudhary 177<br />
which only Pi-k8 was found in Jap<strong>an</strong>ese varieties. Tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
genes to some indica varieties was carried out by Kiyosawa (1972a). It<br />
was shown that the rice lines BL 8 / BL 9 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> BL 11 carried the gene Pi~b<br />
for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to P. grísea <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> BL carried the independent genes Pi-b <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Pi-t. Neither of these genes appeared to be closely linked to Pi-S/ Pi-k, Pii,<br />
Pi-taj, Pi-z+/ Pi-m, or Pi-f. The presence of halo lesions appeared to be<br />
controlled by Pi-t.<br />
Kiyosawa (1974b) assessed 12 varieties for their response to seven<br />
strains of P. grísea <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> classified their response pattern as Shin 2 (New 2)<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shinsetu or Sekhishunakumo types. In Shin 1 type^ a domin<strong>an</strong>t gene<br />
named Pi-i was found while Shinsetu type possessed Pi-i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-a genes.<br />
Kiyosawa (1974c) summarized all the possible genes in Jap<strong>an</strong>ese<br />
varieties of rice against seven strains of P. grísea <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> divided them into<br />
twelve groups. Some non-Jap<strong>an</strong>ese varieties were <strong>an</strong>alyzed for their<br />
reaction to P. grísea by crossing them with Jap<strong>an</strong>ese varieties <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 13<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes were identified in both Jap<strong>an</strong>ese <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> non-Jap<strong>an</strong>ese<br />
varieties^ viz. Pi-a^ Pi-i^ Pi-ks^ Pi-kp, Pi-kh, Pi-ta^ Pi-ta2/ Pi-z, Pi-z+, Pi-m^,<br />
Pi-b <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-t. The loci Pi-k <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-m were linked <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> so were Pi-z <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pii.<br />
Kiyosawa (1983) suggested frequencies of nonr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om association of<br />
virulent genes Av-k+ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Av-km <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Av-ta+ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Av-ta2+.<br />
This clearly indicates that not only matching of resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene, but<br />
also <strong>an</strong> additive part should be present on the same loci for durable<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />
Diallel <strong>an</strong>alysis<br />
Diallel <strong>an</strong>alysis has been employed by Moh<strong>an</strong>ty <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G<strong>an</strong>gopadhyay<br />
(1985) to explore the nature of gene action for blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Tetep,<br />
Zenith, Taduk<strong>an</strong>, Ratna, Jaya, Ratna, Karuna, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Co 13. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce in<br />
the first three varieties was associated with the domin<strong>an</strong>ce effect <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in<br />
the last four with the recessive effect. The parental order of strength of<br />
functional blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes was Zenith Tetep, Taduk<strong>an</strong>, Jaya,<br />
Ratna, Karuna Co 13. Rath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong> (1973) reported that the<br />
lesion types were controlled by major genes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lesion number was<br />
under polygenic control.<br />
Wu et al. (1981) studied the <strong>genetics</strong> of resist<strong>an</strong>ce of Ta-poo-Choo-2,<br />
Taduk<strong>an</strong>, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mamoriaka, which were resist<strong>an</strong>t to four races in Taiw<strong>an</strong>,<br />
by crossing each of the four varieties with Lomello with no known gene<br />
for resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Atkins <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Johnston (1965) studied the crosses between<br />
varieties Zenith <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Gulfrose susceptible to race 1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> resist<strong>an</strong>t to race<br />
6 . They concluded that resist<strong>an</strong>ce to US race 1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 6 was controlled by<br />
<strong>an</strong> independent single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene, Pi-1 in Zenith <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi- 6 in<br />
Gulfrose. Currently used donors for resist<strong>an</strong>ce, identified genes, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
their chromosomal locations are listed in Table 9.1, while improved<br />
varieties released using various resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes are listed in Table 9.2.<br />
i I
178 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges ■<br />
Neck blast<br />
Hashioka (1950) observed that resist<strong>an</strong>ce to neck blast was domin<strong>an</strong>t in<br />
some crosses while recessive in others. He was of the opinion that leaf<br />
blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce was independent of neck blast. Ou <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nuque (1963)<br />
artificially infected several varieties in the leaf <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> half-emerged p<strong>an</strong>icle<br />
stages. They found that varieties resist<strong>an</strong>t to isolates at the seedling<br />
stage showed no neck blast while those susceptible to isolates at the<br />
seedling stage had 46-100% neck rot.<br />
Table 9.1<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> genes conferring resist<strong>an</strong>ce to blast fungus, registered with the <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genetics Cooperative {<strong>Rice</strong> Genetics NexiKletter, vol. 12,1995)<br />
|i|' ^^<br />
Resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
gene<br />
Donor variety<br />
'Chromosome<br />
location<br />
Reference<br />
Pi a Aichi Asahi 11 Yamasaki <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kiyosawa, 1966<br />
Pi-I Ishikari Shiroke, Pujisaka 5 6 Yamasaki <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kiyosawa, 1966<br />
Pik K<strong>an</strong>to 51, Kusabue 11 Yamasaki <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kiyosawa, 1966<br />
Pi k-m Tsuyuake 11 Kiyosawa, 1968<br />
Pi k-p Pusar, K60 11 Kiyosawa, 1969<br />
Pi k-h HR-22, K3 11 Kiyosawa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Murty, 1969<br />
Pi k^s Shin 2, Norin6 11 Kiyosawa, 1969<br />
Pi z Zenith, Fukunishiki 6 Kiyosawa, 1967<br />
Piz-t TKM l,Toridel 6 Yokoo <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kiyosawa, 1970<br />
Pi-zS*^ 5173, C101A51 6 Mackill <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bonm<strong>an</strong>, 1992<br />
Pi ta Taduk<strong>an</strong>, Pi No. 1, K 1, 1 2 Kiyosawa, 1966<br />
Pi ta-2 Taduk<strong>an</strong>, Pi No. 4, Reiho 12 Kiyosawa, 1967<br />
Pib Bengaw<strong>an</strong>, BLl 2 Kiyosawa, 1972<br />
P it Tjahaja, K59 1 Kiyosawa, 1972<br />
Pish Shin2, Nipponbare - Imbe <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Matsumoto, 1985<br />
Pi-1 LAC23, CIOILAC 11 Mackill <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bonm<strong>an</strong>, 1992<br />
Pi-2 5173 6 Inukai et«/., 1994<br />
Pi-3 Pai-k<strong>an</strong>-tao, C104PKT 6 ? Mackill <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bonm<strong>an</strong>, 1992<br />
Pi-5(t) Moroberek<strong>an</strong> 4 W<strong>an</strong>g et ah, 1994<br />
Pi-6 (t)* Apura 1 2 Yu et al, 1991<br />
Pi-7(t). Moroberek<strong>an</strong> 11 W<strong>an</strong>g et aL, 1991<br />
Pi-8 Kasalath 6 P<strong>an</strong> et ah, 1996<br />
Pi-9(t)* WHD-IS-75-1-127,0 . minuta - Reimers et at., 1997<br />
Pi-lO(t)* Tongil 5 Naqvi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chattoo, 1996<br />
Pi-ll(t)* Zaiyeqing 8 8 Kinoshita et ah, 1996<br />
Pi-12(t) Moroberek<strong>an</strong> Inukai et ah, 1996<br />
Pi-13(t) Maow<strong>an</strong>gu 6 Vaxietah 1995<br />
Pi-14(t) Maow<strong>an</strong>gu 2 P<strong>an</strong> et al., 1995<br />
Pi-15(t) GA25 - P<strong>an</strong> et ah, 1995<br />
Pi-16(t) Aus373 2 Anon., 1995<br />
Pi-17{t) DJ123 7 Anon., 1995<br />
Not yet registered<br />
In the Uniform Blast Nursery in Taiw<strong>an</strong>, Ch<strong>an</strong>g et ah (1965) reported<br />
that neck rot <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> seedling blast were fbund to be different <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> perhaps
m i<br />
Ram C. Chaudhary 179<br />
separate genes acted for resist<strong>an</strong>ce in leaf <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> neck blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce. In<br />
the cross between Co. 13 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Co. 25 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its reciprocal cross, neck blast<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce was observed to be governed by two or three domin<strong>an</strong>t genes<br />
with modifiers (Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong>, 1965), who suggested that genes for leaf<br />
blast <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> neck blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce were different. Ito (1965) could find no<br />
correlation between neck <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> seedling blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Ou (1985)<br />
emphasized the existence of different races for which pl<strong>an</strong>ts showing<br />
leaf blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce later became susceptible to neck blast. In the field,<br />
m<strong>an</strong>y races might be present <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> they might ch<strong>an</strong>ge at different seasons.<br />
When varieties are thoroughly tested for resist<strong>an</strong>ce at the seedling stage,<br />
further testing at the flowering stage does not appear necessary.<br />
Table 9.2<br />
Summary of resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> susceptibility of IR varieties developed by<br />
IRRI, Philippines.<br />
Variety<br />
Blast<br />
Bacterial<br />
blight<br />
Disease <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insect reactions<br />
Tungro<br />
Green ■<br />
Leafhopper<br />
Brown<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>thopper<br />
Stem<br />
borer<br />
Gall<br />
midge<br />
IR5 MR S S R S MR S<br />
IRS S s S R S S S<br />
IR20 MR R s R s MR s<br />
1R22 S R s S s S s<br />
IR24 S S s R s S s<br />
IR26 MR R MR R R MR s<br />
IR28 R R R R R MR s<br />
IR32 MR R R R R MR R<br />
IR36 MR R R R R MR R<br />
1R38 MR R R R R MR R<br />
IR42 MR R R R R MR R<br />
1R46 MR R R R R MR R<br />
IR50 S R R R R S -<br />
IR54 MR R R R R MR -<br />
IR58 MR R R R R S<br />
„<br />
IR60 MR R R R R MR -<br />
IR62 MR R R R R MR -<br />
IR64 MR R R R R MR -<br />
IR66 MR R R R R MR -<br />
IR68 MR R R R R MR<br />
„<br />
IR72 MR R R R R MR -<br />
R: Resist<strong>an</strong>t; S: Susceptible; MR: Moderately resist<strong>an</strong>t.<br />
In Egypt, Balal et al. (1977) studied leaf blast <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> neck blast in five<br />
crosses from varieties resist<strong>an</strong>t (YNA 282 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Arabi) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> susceptible<br />
(Nahda <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Giza 159), Observations in the F2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> F 3 indicated that leaf<br />
blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce was simply inherited <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> controlled by two genes<br />
designated LPl <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> LP2. YNA 282 possessed LPi while Arabi carried<br />
Lpi Ppi; Nahda <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Giza 159 both possessed IPil <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IPi2 genes.
180 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to leaf blast was positively correlated with neck blast in three<br />
out of four crosses. The correlation was highly signific<strong>an</strong>t. YNA. 282<br />
possessed the complementary genes NPil <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> NPi2 while Arabi carried<br />
NPi3. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to leaf blast was highly <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> signific<strong>an</strong>tly correlated<br />
with resist<strong>an</strong>ce to neck blast in three out of four crosses in a positive<br />
way. Hence^ the genes for leaf blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce (LPil <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> LPi2) were<br />
effective to some extent in combating neck blast.<br />
B r e e d in g<br />
iiíi' :<br />
Breeding for blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce has been followed in various countries for<br />
the last 60 years. Efforts <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> achievements of early years have been<br />
reviewed by Ito (1965)/ Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong> (1965)/ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chaudhary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nayak<br />
(1987). Broadly speaking, there are two types of resist<strong>an</strong>ce: avoid<strong>an</strong>ce or<br />
disease escape <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> true resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Avoid<strong>an</strong>ce involves a heterogeneous<br />
group of mech<strong>an</strong>isms, which depends on the structure of the entire<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t/ of certain pl<strong>an</strong>t parts or of certain pl<strong>an</strong>t tissues. True resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
reduces the first moment of contact between the host tissue <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
parasite. It implies <strong>an</strong> intimate contact between the host tissue <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
parasite <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> involves the expression of their mutual interaction.<br />
Resist<strong>an</strong>ce may be of a hypersensitive type, which is frequently used in<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>breeding</strong>. The resist<strong>an</strong>ce controlled by major genes is race<br />
specific <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> has been used extensively. But due to hitherto unexplained<br />
reasons, such resist<strong>an</strong>ce has had a short life sp<strong>an</strong>. Contrary to major<br />
genic resist<strong>an</strong>ce, the partial resist<strong>an</strong>ce, controlled by polygenes, is<br />
durable. Thus in the <strong>breeding</strong> program, <strong>breeding</strong> lines or test varieties<br />
with less th<strong>an</strong> complete resist<strong>an</strong>ce are selected.<br />
Over time, various strategies have been followed to control blast<br />
disease using host pl<strong>an</strong>t resist<strong>an</strong>ce. The usual practice of replacing the<br />
succumbed variety has been followed but with little success. Pyramiding<br />
of the major blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene was followed but given up for fear of<br />
developing the super race of "blast fungus".<br />
Ezuka (1979) suggested that if a high level of "field resist<strong>an</strong>ce" were<br />
to be incorporated in a variety with "true resist<strong>an</strong>ce", such a variety<br />
would be more stable. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes Pi-ta <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-ta2 from the<br />
Philippines variety Taduk<strong>an</strong> were tr<strong>an</strong>sferred to japónica background.<br />
A number of varieties resist<strong>an</strong>t to blast were released in Jap<strong>an</strong>: Shinju,<br />
Futaba, Vasevakaba, Kog<strong>an</strong>ennishiki, Ukonnishiki, Hoiriarenishiki,<br />
Fugimoriri, Reimi, K<strong>an</strong>to 51, K<strong>an</strong>to 53, K<strong>an</strong>to 54, Kasabue, Yuukara,<br />
Shenshuraku, Kongo, Minehikari, Shikokata, Tosa, Senbon, Asahikari,<br />
Satomino, Akige, Toride 1, Toride 2.<br />
In India, Co. 4 was developed as a resist<strong>an</strong>t variety in 1924 followed<br />
by TKM-1. Since blast disease is limited to hilly tracts <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> certain
Ram C. Chaudhary 181<br />
seasons, <strong>breeding</strong> is limited to just those situations. From time to time a<br />
number of varieties have been released for such situations. At IRRI,<br />
Philippines, incorporation of blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce is one of the import<strong>an</strong>t<br />
aims of the <strong>breeding</strong> program. Donors such as Dawn, Tetep, Zenith,<br />
Gam pai 15, P<strong>an</strong>khari 203, Carreon, Ram Tulasi, Oryza nivara, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a<br />
number of improved pl<strong>an</strong>t type lines are used on a regular basis.<br />
Screening of all <strong>breeding</strong> lines is a regular feature. As a result, most test<br />
entries from the <strong>breeding</strong> program come out with a reasonable degree of<br />
success. In addition to the concept of complete resist<strong>an</strong>ce, partial<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce is followed in the irrigated rice ecosystem with the idea that<br />
such resist<strong>an</strong>ce may be durable,<br />
Given the uncertainty of the variability of the pathogen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
history of resist<strong>an</strong>ce breakdown, it is not surprising that a number of<br />
different pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>breeding</strong> approaches have been proposed to achieve<br />
durable blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Until very recently, however, the tools to apply<br />
the concepts for <strong>breeding</strong> for durable blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce have been lacking.<br />
Molecular techniques for characterizing pathogen virulence, pathogen<br />
populations, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> host pl<strong>an</strong>t resist<strong>an</strong>ce, should offer the me<strong>an</strong>s to test<br />
hypotheses on the nature of durable resist<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />
Proposals for the use of major genes have moved beyond developing<br />
lines with single genes effective against a few pathotypes. Robinson's<br />
(1973) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nelson's (1978) general proposal that major genes may be<br />
combined, or "pyramided", to confer "horizontal" resist<strong>an</strong>ce effective<br />
against all pathotypes of a pathogen, was supported by Ou (1979) as a<br />
me<strong>an</strong>s to achieve reasonably durable resist<strong>an</strong>ce to blast. Crill et aL (1981)<br />
proposed that varieties with different major genes could be rotated in<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> out of production in a particular region to take adv<strong>an</strong>tage of<br />
virulence shifts in the pathogen population driven by the ch<strong>an</strong>ges in<br />
varietal resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Mackenzie (1979) proposed the use of multi lines, or<br />
a mixture of lines, each carrying one or a few major genes. He<br />
emphasized the care with which the resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes should be<br />
m<strong>an</strong>ipulated, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that usefulness <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> durability will depend on how<br />
they are deployed.<br />
Other rice scientists have argued that major genes obscure the<br />
underlying resist<strong>an</strong>ce of the pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that the use of these genes may<br />
result in lines that are extremely susceptible when the major genes are<br />
overcome (the so-called "vertifolia effect" of V<strong>an</strong> der Pl<strong>an</strong>k). That is,<br />
there will be no me<strong>an</strong>s to select for the minor genes, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in crosses in<br />
which the parents differ markedly in composition there is a high<br />
probability that most minor genes of interest will be lost. We c<strong>an</strong><br />
presume that this underlying resist<strong>an</strong>ce is functionally equivalent to that<br />
mediated by QTLs. Various proposals have been put forth to avoid<br />
erosion of resist<strong>an</strong>ce, escape, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the "vertifolia effect". These include
182 Ríce Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
M:<br />
<strong>breeding</strong> in environments that are extremely conducive to blast disease<br />
development ("hot spots"), rejection of <strong>breeding</strong> lines that are<br />
symptomless, inclusion of traditional <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> "unimproved" sources of<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce obtained from blast conducive environments, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> proper<br />
characterization of the target environment (Kiyosawa, 1972b; Ezuka,<br />
1979; Ou, 1979; Buddenhagen, 1983; Bonm<strong>an</strong> et al., 1992, Johnson <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Bonm<strong>an</strong>, 1993). An approach integrating most of these suggestions has<br />
been applied with some success at the Centro Internacional de<br />
Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) rice <strong>breeding</strong> <strong>research</strong> farm in eastern<br />
Colombia (Correa-Victoria et at., 1992) where materials are developed<br />
for distribution to rice programs in Latin America, Latin America tends<br />
to have serious blast problems because nitrogen application rates are<br />
high, water control in irrigated fields is usually poor, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> vast areas are<br />
grown under upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> conditions. A word of caution should be raised<br />
regarding the use of "hot spot" <strong>breeding</strong> sites. By developing complex<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce under conditions of high pathogen diversity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> unknown<br />
variability,'breeders may be allowing the pathogens to adapt to novel<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene combination.<br />
In contrast to CIAT, IRRI has opted to focus on developing partial<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce for the less blast-conducive irrigated rice environments.<br />
Breeding lines are evaluated in blast nurseries (Bonm<strong>an</strong> et al., 1991,<br />
1992) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> those with relatively reduced disease development are<br />
selected as partially resist<strong>an</strong>t. Cultivars developed in this m<strong>an</strong>ner have<br />
generally performed well in the field, but when conditions are<br />
particularly favorable for disease development, economic losses may<br />
occur.<br />
Bacterial Blight<br />
Bacterial blight (BB) caused by the bacteria Xatithomonas campestris pv.<br />
oryzae. The disease has been reported from most Asi<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Afric<strong>an</strong> ricegrowing<br />
countries. The disease is reported to produce three types of<br />
symptoms: leaf blights, kresek, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pale yellow (Ou, 1985; Mew <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Vera Cruz 1977, 1979; Mew et ah, 1971). The leaf blight symptoms are<br />
characterized by small water-soaked spots or stripes or lesions at the<br />
margin of the leaf blades, from the early tillering stage to the flowering<br />
stage. The spots enlarge <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> form a wavy margin. The lesions c<strong>an</strong> cover<br />
the entire leaf blade <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> may even adv<strong>an</strong>ce into the leaf sheath. In<br />
severely diseased fields, grains may also be infected, lesions appearing<br />
as discolored water-soaked spots on the glumes (Ou, 1985).<br />
Kresek symptoms are characterized by withering of the leaves of the<br />
entire pl<strong>an</strong>t at the early vegetative stage (2~4 weeks after tr<strong>an</strong>spl<strong>an</strong>ting).<br />
Affected pl<strong>an</strong>ts show marked stunting <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soft roots that later may
Ram C. Chaudhary 183<br />
become detached <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> float on the surface of the water (Goto, 1970).<br />
Kresek is usually caused by bacterial invasion of roots during<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>spl<strong>an</strong>ting or through cut ends of leaves. Pale yellow symptoms are<br />
characterized by the production of pale yellow leaves, which are<br />
normally green, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the youngest leaf is uniformly pale yellow to<br />
whitish. Broad greenish-yellow stripes may appear on the leaf blade<br />
(Ou, 1985). Pale yellowing is normally associated with early infection in<br />
which the growing point remains alive but tr<strong>an</strong>slocation systems are<br />
blocked by bacterial mass in the xylem vessels, The pathological<br />
relationships between the three symptoms of bacterial blight syndrome<br />
are not fully understood. Although caused by the same pathogen, kresek<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leaf blight appear to be distinct <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> independent of each other. Pale<br />
yellowing is a secondary effect of either leaf blight or kresek (Hsieh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Ch<strong>an</strong>g, 1977; Mew et a/., 1971).<br />
E t io l o g y<br />
Farmers of Fukuoka area in Jap<strong>an</strong> first noticed this malady in 1884<br />
(Tagami <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mizukami, 1962) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thought it to be a physiological<br />
disorder resulting from high soil acidity, as the oozing from the leaves<br />
had <strong>an</strong> acidic reaction. In 1908, Takaishi found bacterial masses in the<br />
dew drops, isolated the bacteria <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> successfully inoculated the leaves<br />
but did not name the org<strong>an</strong>ism (Ou, 1985). Subsequent workers<br />
identified the org<strong>an</strong>ism as Bacillus oryzae Hora <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bokura, Pseudomonas<br />
oryzae Uyeda <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ishiyama, Bacterium oryzae (Uyeda <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ishiyama,<br />
Nakatsi), X<strong>an</strong>thomonas oryzae (Uyeda <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ishiyama), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> very recently<br />
X<strong>an</strong>thomonas campestris (Dye et ah, 1980).The disease is now widely<br />
distributed in almost the entire Asi<strong>an</strong> continent (Mew <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1981),<br />
Australia (Buddenhagen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reddy, 1972), Latin America (Loz<strong>an</strong>o,<br />
1977), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in several Afric<strong>an</strong> countries (Mew <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1981). Yield<br />
losses r<strong>an</strong>ging from 10% to 80% have been reported in Jap<strong>an</strong>, Indonesia<br />
(Reitsma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Schure, 1950), Ir\dia (AICRIP 1971; Rao <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kauffm<strong>an</strong>,<br />
1977), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Philippines (Reys et al, 1982). The disease not only causes<br />
yield reduction, but also lowering of grain quality. The extent of damage<br />
from the disease depends on factors such as temperature, relative<br />
humidity, rainfall, wind, spacing, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> growth stage of the crop when the<br />
disease occurs.<br />
V a r ia t io n in P a t h o g e n ic it y<br />
Jap<strong>an</strong>ese scientists in 1957 suspected the pathogenic variability of the<br />
pathogen when a resist<strong>an</strong>t variety Asakaze was severely infected by the<br />
blight (Khush, 1977a). Based on the differential reaction of the varieties<br />
in different locations in various countries, m<strong>an</strong>y reports appeared
184 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
(Buddenhagen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reddy, 1972; Ezuka <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Horino, 1974;<br />
G<strong>an</strong>gopadhyay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong>, 1987). Several reports supported the<br />
existence of pathogenic races of the bacterium (G<strong>an</strong>gopadhyay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong>, 1987; Mew <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vera Cruz, 1977, 1979). Currently strains<br />
of X, campestris cv. oryzae are classified into four groups based on their<br />
pathogenicity. Some countries have specific pathotypes .that are very<br />
different from others.<br />
S o u r c e s o p r e s is t a n c e<br />
yni<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> germplasm collections have been evaluated for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />
bacterial blight in several countries, notably B<strong>an</strong>gladesh, China, India,<br />
Indonesia, Jap<strong>an</strong>, Laos, Malaysia, Nepal, Philippines, Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka,<br />
Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, Vietnam, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a large number of donors have been identified.<br />
The resist<strong>an</strong>t doors identified at IRRI Philippines originated in three<br />
geographic regions. A large number came from northeast India,<br />
B<strong>an</strong>gladesh, Nepal, which was designated as Gene Center 1, for bacterial<br />
blight by Khush (1977a, 1977b). The other group came from Gene Center<br />
2 , which consists of southern India <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka. The third Gene Center<br />
is Java <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> adjoining isl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s of Indonesia. Only a few donors came from<br />
China, Laos, Malaysia, the Philippines, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>.<br />
A very novel source of resist<strong>an</strong>ce was identified in <strong>an</strong> accession of<br />
Oryza longistaminata (Devadath, 1983), who claimed it was "immune" to<br />
the races of the pathogen known till then.<br />
G e n e t ic s<br />
Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to bacterial blight disease in rice has been<br />
studied extensively in Jap<strong>an</strong> (Skaguchi et ah, 1968) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IRRI (Murty <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Khush, 1972; Olufowote et ah, 1977; Singh et ah, 1983). The studies in<br />
Jap<strong>an</strong> indicated that the resist<strong>an</strong>ce of the Kidama group to isolates of<br />
group I of the bacterium were controlled by a single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene,<br />
Xa-1. The virulence of the R<strong>an</strong>taj-emas group had two genes for<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce, Xa-1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xa-2. The gene Xa-2 conveys resist<strong>an</strong>ce to the<br />
bacterial isolates of group II. Xa-1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xa-2 are linked with a<br />
recombination value of 2.16% <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are located on chromosome 11. No<br />
variety with Xa- 2 alone has been identified although segregates with<br />
Xa- 2 Xa - 2 genotypes have been obtained in the segregating populations<br />
of crosses between varieties of the R<strong>an</strong>taj-emas group <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kinmaze<br />
group (Khush, 1977a).<br />
Ogawa et ah (1978) found that the resist<strong>an</strong>ce of the Kogyoku group<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Java group of varieties to bacterial group V was governed by a<br />
single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene designated as Xa-kg or a gene very closely linked<br />
with it. Xa-kg was inherited independently of Xa-w but it was closely
Ram C. Chaudhary 185<br />
linked with Xa-1 with a recombination value of 2%. The resist<strong>an</strong>ce in<br />
Jaya 14 was reported to be controlled by three domin<strong>an</strong>t geneS/ Xa-l, Xa-<br />
2, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xa-kg. Yamada (1984) studied the <strong>genetics</strong> of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in IR28,<br />
which was resist<strong>an</strong>t to all five pathotypes of the bacterium present in<br />
Jap<strong>an</strong>. He reported that one major gene controlled the resist<strong>an</strong>ce in this<br />
variety to bacterial group I <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>other major gene controlled its<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce to bacterial group V, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the two genes were linked closely<br />
with a crossover value of about 4%. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to other pathotypes (1/ II/<br />
IV) was controlled by minor genes or polygenes.<br />
Studies at IRRI on the <strong>genetics</strong> of bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce have<br />
shown that bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice may be domin<strong>an</strong>t or<br />
recessive depending on the donor parent. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Sigadis is<br />
governed by a single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes in Sigadis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
'fKM 6 are allelic but the gene in Bjl is different. Likewise/ Zenith <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
B859A4-18-1 have the same gene for resist<strong>an</strong>ce while the gene in Wase<br />
Aikoku 3 is non allelic. Varieties IR20 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR22 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the <strong>breeding</strong> line<br />
IR1529-680-3 possess the same domin<strong>an</strong>t gene for resist<strong>an</strong>ce designated<br />
as Xa-4 (Petpisit et al., 1977). IR 1330-3-2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> PelitaI/1 possess Xa-4/ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Kale <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CB II have xa-5 gene for resist<strong>an</strong>ce (Olufowote et al., 1977).<br />
The domin<strong>an</strong>t gene in variety Semora M<strong>an</strong>gga from Indonesia was<br />
located at the Xa-4 locus but its expression was different from that in<br />
other varieties possessing Xa-4 gene. The gene in Semora M<strong>an</strong>gga<br />
imparted resist<strong>an</strong>ce only at the booting <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> post-flowering stages <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
was designated Xa-4b/ in contrast to the Xa-4a present in IR22, which<br />
conveyed resist<strong>an</strong>ce at all growth stages (Librojo et al., 1976). A<br />
domin<strong>an</strong>t gene conveying resist<strong>an</strong>ce to bacterial leaf blight at booting<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> postponing stages showing a phenomenon of domin<strong>an</strong>ce reversal<br />
was reported by Sidhu <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush (1978) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> named Xa-6.<br />
Among resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties/ gene Xa-4b was most widely distributed/<br />
followed by xa-5 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xa-4a (Sidhu et ah, 1979). Cultivars DZ 78 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
PI231129 possess Xa-7 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> xa-8/ respectively. Xa-7 conveys resist<strong>an</strong>ce at<br />
the booting <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> postbooting stages whereas xa-8 is effective at all stages<br />
(Sidhu et d., 1979). Variety Sateng from Laos possesses <strong>an</strong>other recessive<br />
genC/ xa-9/ which conveys resist<strong>an</strong>ce at all growth stages (Singh et al.,<br />
1983). Variety CAS 209 from Senegal possesses a new gene/ Xa-10/ which<br />
conveys resist<strong>an</strong>ce to Philippine isolates <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> belongs to group II (Yoshimura<br />
et al, 1983).<br />
The recessive gene xa-13 located on chromosome 5 was identified<br />
from variety BJl. Xa-14 was identified from Taichimg native 1, Xa-16<br />
from Tetep/ Xa-17 from Asaminori, Xa-18 from Toyonishiki/ xa-19 from<br />
XM 5/ xa-20 from XM 6, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xa-21 from Oryza longistaminata (Anon<br />
1995).
186 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
B reeding<br />
Breeding work for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to bacterial blight has been carried out in<br />
Jap<strong>an</strong> for 60 years <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> at IRRI for 30 years. National rice improvement<br />
programs of B<strong>an</strong>gladesh, China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Nepal, Sri<br />
L<strong>an</strong>ka, Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, Vietnam are now endeavoring to incorporate resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
to bacterial blight into the improved varieties (Chaudhary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nayak,<br />
1987). The first bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>t variety, Norin 27, was bred at<br />
Kumamoto Breeding Center <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> released in 1946 (Mizukami, 1966).<br />
Askaze was bred in the early 1950s <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hayatomoto in the early 1960s at<br />
Kyushu Agricultural Experiment Station. Since then, several varieties<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t to bacterial blight have been developed but all of them have the<br />
Xa-1 gene for resist<strong>an</strong>ce (Toriyama, 1975). The <strong>breeding</strong> program for<br />
incorporating resist<strong>an</strong>ce to bacterial blight was started at IRRI in 1964<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> several resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties have been released by the IRRI <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
Philippine Seed Board: IR20, IR22, IR26, R28, IR29, IR30, IR32, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR34.<br />
Varieties IR36, IR38, IR40, IR42, IR43, IR44, IR45, IR46, IR48, IR50, IR52,<br />
IR54, IR56, IR58, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR60 released by the Philippine Seed Board are also<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t. All these IR varieties have Xa-4 for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to bacterial<br />
blight, although improved <strong>breeding</strong> lines with Xa-5, Xa-6 , <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xa-7 have<br />
also been developed. Efforts to develop varieties resist<strong>an</strong>t to BB at IRRI<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in other countries have been summarized by Khush (1977a, b; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
1989).<br />
Brown Spot<br />
The brown spot disease caused by Cochliobolus miyabe<strong>an</strong>us (Ito et<br />
Kuribayashi) Drechsler ex Dastur, is more commonly known by its other<br />
scientific name, Helminthosporium oryzae Breda de Ha<strong>an</strong>. It has been<br />
known for the past 80 years <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> has been reported in all rice-growing<br />
countries in Asia, USA <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Africa (Ou, 1985). The fungus attacks rice<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts in all growth stages. The symptoms of brown spot disease (Ou,<br />
1985) are most conspicuous on the leaves <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the glumes. They may also<br />
appear on the coleoptile, the leaf sheath, p<strong>an</strong>icle <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more rarely on<br />
roots of young seedlings. Typical spots on the leaves are oval, about the<br />
shape <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> size of a sesame seed, brownish with a gray or whitish center<br />
when fully developed. They are relatively uniform <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> evenly<br />
distributed over the leaf surface. The most devastating rice-yield losses<br />
that led to the Great Bengal famine of 1943 in which a few million people<br />
died of starvation, is attributed to the brown spot disease (Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong>,<br />
1973).
Ram C. Chaudhary 187<br />
Etiology<br />
The fungal spores after falling on the leaf surface germinate <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
penetrate the tissue. Nawaz <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kausar (1962), Misra <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chatter] ee<br />
(1963) noted that the pathogenicity of fungus isolates r<strong>an</strong>ges from very<br />
weak to extremely virulent.<br />
Genetics<br />
Emphasis centered on identifying varieties resist<strong>an</strong>t to brown spot after<br />
the 1943 epidemic 1943 in Bengal. A number of varieties were identified<br />
as resist<strong>an</strong>t in India^ viz. Dakar Nagar 273-32, Patnai 549-33, Kalma 219,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nagra 4 M 4 (G<strong>an</strong>guli, 1946), Ch 13, Ch 41, Ch 45, T498-2a, Co 20,<br />
BAM 10, T998M, T2112, T2118, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T96 (Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong> et al, 1966). In<br />
Jap<strong>an</strong>, Asada et aL (1954) identified Hain<strong>an</strong> No. 217, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chin Tiu Chin<br />
as resist<strong>an</strong>t.<br />
The <strong>genetics</strong> of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to brown spot has not been studied<br />
adequately. Nagai <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hara (1930) reported that resist<strong>an</strong>ce in a Kore<strong>an</strong><br />
strain of rice was monogenic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> domin<strong>an</strong>t. On the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, Adair<br />
(1941) found resist<strong>an</strong>ce to be controlled by a recessive gene. Studies at<br />
IRRI, Philippines (IRRI, 1983), reported resist<strong>an</strong>ce to be controlled by a<br />
single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene in one variety, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> by two complementary genes<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one inhibitory gene in <strong>an</strong>other variety.<br />
Breeding<br />
Although no org<strong>an</strong>ized effort is currently employed, nonetheless<br />
<strong>breeding</strong> lines are scored <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> selected for resist<strong>an</strong>ce under filed<br />
conditions in most countries where brown spot is a problem. In India, all<br />
the trial entries are screened on a regular basis (Misra et al, 1976) by the<br />
Central <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (CRRI), Cuttack, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Directorate of <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research (DRR), Hyderabad.<br />
Sheath Blight<br />
Sheath blight (ShB) of rice caused by Rhizoctonia sol<strong>an</strong>i Kuhn, once a<br />
minor disease, has become a major disease in m<strong>an</strong>y countries, inflicting<br />
heavy losses. It was first reported from Jap<strong>an</strong> in 1910 by Miyake <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
subsequently in B<strong>an</strong>gladesh, China, India, Indonesia, Philippines, Sri<br />
L<strong>an</strong>ka, Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, USA, Brazil, Surinam, Madagascar, Malaysia,<br />
Vietnam, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Venezuela (Premlatha Dath, 1990).<br />
Sheath blight usually attacks rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts at the tillering stage, causing<br />
greenish-gray ellipsoid or ovoid spots (about 1 0 mm long) on the leaf<br />
sheath. Sclerotia are formed on or around these spots but are easily<br />
detached. The size <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> color of the spots <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the formation of sclerotia
188 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
depends on environmental conditions. Under favorable conditiorts they<br />
are also formed on the upper leaf sheath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the leaf blades. Eventually<br />
the whole leaf blade gets blighted^, killing most leaves partially or fully.<br />
Grain formation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> filling is severely affected. Singh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pavgi (1969)<br />
reported details of infection^ etiology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> losses due to sheath blight.<br />
Mizuta (1956) reported a yield loss of 25% when the blight affects the<br />
flag leaf. Earlier the disease was serious in the temperate regions where<br />
dew deposition was heavy for prolonged periods. But now due to the<br />
use of high tillering varieties, high pl<strong>an</strong>t population <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> heavy use of<br />
nitrogen fertilizers, the diseases has spread to other areas as well.<br />
V ariation in Pathogenicity<br />
Fungal isolates differ in pathogenicity (Akai et ah, 1960; IRRI, 1974).<br />
However, the susceptible <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> resist<strong>an</strong>t reactions used in distinguishing<br />
the races are not so clear cut, often creating confusion.<br />
Resist<strong>an</strong>t donors<br />
Among cultivars grown in the southern United States, the highest level<br />
of resist<strong>an</strong>ce is found in the short <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> medium grain type rices, which<br />
are closer to japónica types. The long grain types are mostly susceptible<br />
(Lee <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rush, 1983). None of the rice varieties grown in Taiw<strong>an</strong> are<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t. Since 1970, thous<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s of <strong>breeding</strong> lines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> varieties have<br />
been tested at IRRI, Philippines, using the adult-stage inoculation<br />
method (IRRI, 1974) but none were found to be resist<strong>an</strong>t (IRRI, 1984;<br />
Premlatha Dath, 1990). Premlatha Dath (1990) has cited a large list of<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t to moderately resist<strong>an</strong>t lines; however, their perform<strong>an</strong>ce was<br />
not consistent under close scrutiny. This was primarily due to the<br />
methods of inoculation, field conditions, inoculum used, disease scoring<br />
method, aggressiveness of the pathogen used, etc. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce was also<br />
reported in some accessions for O. barthii <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. rufipog<strong>an</strong> (K<strong>an</strong>naiy<strong>an</strong><br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Prasad, 1978).<br />
A number of factors such as morphological (tightness of leaf sheath<br />
around stem, amount of wax deposition on outer leaf sheath) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
presence of toxins are associated with incident of the disease.<br />
Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Limited information is available on the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of sheath blight<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce primarily due to a dependable resist<strong>an</strong>t parent. But<br />
indications from the perform<strong>an</strong>ce of F^s are that the resist<strong>an</strong>ce is<br />
domin<strong>an</strong>t (Premlatha Dath, 1990). In certain cases a clear-cut 3 : 1<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t : susceptible segregation pattern was reported (Hashioka, 1951;<br />
Ch<strong>an</strong>g, 1962) in the F2 generation. Wax thickness, which was correlated
Ram C. Chaudhary 189<br />
with resist<strong>an</strong>ce, also segregated into a 3:1 ratio in p2 - Goita (1985)<br />
studied the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in crosses between four susceptible<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> three resist<strong>an</strong>t lines. Inoculation was done under control conditions.<br />
The frequency distribution of the F2 progeny showed a bimodal pattern<br />
with modes at 5 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 7. In most crosses, the resist<strong>an</strong>t-to-susceptible ratio<br />
was 9 ; 7, suggesting that two pairs of complementary genes controlled<br />
the resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Heritability estimates were low though, possibly due to<br />
epistatic interactions <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other unexplained reasons.<br />
B r e e d in g<br />
Due to the fact that dependable resist<strong>an</strong>t donors are lacking, <strong>breeding</strong><br />
for resist<strong>an</strong>t cultivars has not been very successful. Even in Jap<strong>an</strong> where<br />
the disease is serious, successful <strong>breeding</strong> for resist<strong>an</strong>ce has not been<br />
achieved (Toriyama, 1975). Khush (1977b) suggested a <strong>breeding</strong> strategy<br />
which involves continuous evaluation of the germplasm to identify lines<br />
with higher levels of resist<strong>an</strong>ce, through screening of all adv<strong>an</strong>ced<br />
<strong>breeding</strong> lines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> elimination of highly susceptible material, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
org<strong>an</strong>ized <strong>breeding</strong> programs using selected lines with moderate levels<br />
of resist<strong>an</strong>ce. The program aims at pyramiding minor genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
from several parents into the same line by recurrent selection.<br />
But such approaches failed to yield expected results at IRRI<br />
Philippines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Indonesia. A program to breed high yielding cultivars<br />
with a high level of resist<strong>an</strong>ce was initiated in 1979 at DRR, Hyderabad,<br />
using such donors as P<strong>an</strong>kaj, Ramadja, T 141, OS 4. Some <strong>breeding</strong> lines<br />
were reported to combine better levels of resist<strong>an</strong>ce with high yield<br />
(R<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Saty<strong>an</strong>aray<strong>an</strong>a, 1982; Reddy et al, 1986). The approach using<br />
genetic engineering with chitinase genes from rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> barley appears<br />
bright (Khush, 1998) for the control of ShB in rice.<br />
Tungro<br />
Tungro virus disease of rice is limiting rice production in B<strong>an</strong>gladesh,<br />
India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, causing yield<br />
losses up to 1 0 0 %. In India, tungro disease was first identified in 1967<br />
but acquired epidemic proportions in 1973 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 1981 in the north-eastern<br />
region. The disease is tr<strong>an</strong>smitted by rice green leafhoppers Nephotettix<br />
virescens <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nephotettix nigropictus. These leafhoppers acquire the virus<br />
while feeding on phloem, of the infected rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>smit the<br />
same to healthy pl<strong>an</strong>ts during feeding.<br />
Etiology<br />
The virus is a nonpersistent leafhopper tr<strong>an</strong>smitted virus. It c<strong>an</strong> readily<br />
be tr<strong>an</strong>smitted within a minimum period of two hours after acquisition.
190 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Quick <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> efficient tr<strong>an</strong>smission of the virus, occurrence of the vector in<br />
vast numbers, easy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rapid build-up of the vector under early<br />
vegetative growth under field conditions, quick moving <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> longdist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
migrating prolific <strong>breeding</strong> vectors spread the disease rapidly.<br />
Tungro is endemic to areas with overlapping or continuous crop<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ting. Off-season, the virus survives on wild rices, rice stubble, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
some weeds as symptomless carries.<br />
The leaves of the affected pl<strong>an</strong>ts turn or<strong>an</strong>ge or brick-red, coupled<br />
with chlorosis in newly emerged leaves. The infected pl<strong>an</strong>ts are greatly<br />
stunted <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> may have a reduced number of tillers, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> may not bear<br />
p<strong>an</strong>icles. Even if p<strong>an</strong>icles emerge, they are reduced in length <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bear<br />
discolored <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chaffy spikelets.<br />
The symptoms differ based on strain <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> particle type of the rice<br />
tungro vims (RTV). Rivera <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ou (1967) first reported the existence of<br />
strain sin RTV from the Philippines. Two strains designated as "s" <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
"m" were identified. Anj<strong>an</strong>eyulu <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> John (1972) subsequently<br />
identified four strains: RTV 1, RTV 2A, RTV 2B, RTV3. Misra et al (1976)<br />
added RTV 4 to the list. It is known that RTV is a complex made up of<br />
separate viruses, which c<strong>an</strong> be separated on the basis of symptomology,<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>smission characters, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the electron microscopic structure of the<br />
virus particles itself.<br />
Genetics<br />
No thorough <strong>an</strong>alysis of the mode of inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of tungro resist<strong>an</strong>ce has<br />
been carried out to date. Preliminary reports indicate that two genes<br />
may convey resist<strong>an</strong>ce in some varieties. A study of the P<strong>an</strong>khari 203/<br />
Taichung Native 1 at IRRI indicated that resist<strong>an</strong>ce in P<strong>an</strong>khari 203 is<br />
governed by two complementary domin<strong>an</strong>t genes (IRRI, 1967).<br />
According to Shastry et al, (1972), resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Latisail is under duplicate<br />
gene control giving a segregation ratio of 9 : 7.<br />
After compilation of the International <strong>Rice</strong> Tungro Virus Project,<br />
Ling et al (1981) reported that the reaction of 1 0 rice varieties, viz. TNI,<br />
IR26, Ambemohar 159, Habig<strong>an</strong>j, DW8 , Kataribhog, Latisail, P<strong>an</strong>khari<br />
203, IR34, Gam Pai 30-1-2-15, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ptb 18 differed in different localities,<br />
indicating strainal variation of RTV. They further concluded that<br />
Habig<strong>an</strong>j, DW 8 , <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ptb 18 c<strong>an</strong> be used to separate the RTV strains.<br />
Some accessions of wild rice species, e.g. O. gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis, O. latifolia, O.<br />
malampzhuaensis, O. minuta, O. officinalis, O. perrieri, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
schweinforthi<strong>an</strong>a, have been reported to be resist<strong>an</strong>t to RTV (Anj<strong>an</strong>eyulu<br />
et al, 1981). A number of improved pl<strong>an</strong>t type varieties have been<br />
developed using one or the other donors (Tables 9.2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 9.3),<br />
i ¡Ml'
Ram C. Chaudhary 191<br />
Breeding<br />
The earliest <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> classic work on <strong>breeding</strong> for tungro resist<strong>an</strong>ce was<br />
carried out in Indonesia in the early 1930s. Mentek disease, now known<br />
to be identical to Tungro, has caused serious crop losses in the country<br />
since 1859. Even though its exact nature was not exactly understood at<br />
that time, several varieties were found resist<strong>an</strong>t to it when grown in<br />
mentek-infected areas. At Bogor in 1934, V<strong>an</strong> der Muelen crossed the<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t variety Latisail from India with the susceptible variety Tjina<br />
from China. Seeds from the F4 bulk of that cross were divided into four<br />
parts <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grown at four experiment stations located in the regions<br />
where mentek was causing serious crop losses. Three stations were in<br />
West Java <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the fourth in East Java. Individual pl<strong>an</strong>t selections were<br />
made at each station on the basis of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to mentek. Single pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
progeny lines were further evaluated for mentek resist<strong>an</strong>ce, yielding<br />
ability, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> agronomic traits at the stations <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in farmers' fields. From<br />
the trials, several adv<strong>an</strong>ced generation <strong>breeding</strong> lines with mentek<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> good agronomic traits were identified <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> released as<br />
varieties. Those selected were Bengaw<strong>an</strong> (at Ngale in East Java), Peta,<br />
Mas, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Int<strong>an</strong> (at Singamerta), Fadjar (in West Java), Pelopor <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Salak<br />
(Bogor), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tjahaja (at Tjitajam, near Bogor). Int<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mas were<br />
released for commercial production in 1940; Tjahaja, Fadjar, Pelopor,<br />
Bengaw<strong>an</strong>, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Peta, in 1941; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Salak, in 1942. Within a short time, the<br />
varieties were distributed all over the country, where they gradually<br />
replaced the old, susceptible varieties, particularly where mentek was<br />
known to be serious. Varieties Peta, Int<strong>an</strong>, Bengaw<strong>an</strong>, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mas became<br />
especially popular in Indonesia, the Philippines, Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, B<strong>an</strong>gladesh,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> India where all four proved resist<strong>an</strong>t to tungro (G<strong>an</strong>gopadhyay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong>, 1987).<br />
The <strong>breeding</strong> program for tungro resist<strong>an</strong>ce at IRRI was started<br />
during 1966-1967. Several resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties—Peta, Int<strong>an</strong>, Sigadis,<br />
TKM6 , HR21, Malagkit Sungsong, Gam Pai, Ptb 18, P<strong>an</strong>khari 203, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
BJl—^were donor parents. Improved pl<strong>an</strong>t type <strong>breeding</strong> lines with<br />
tungro resist<strong>an</strong>ce were identified from the crosses of most of those<br />
parents (Table 9.3) Seven IRRI-named varieties are moderately to highly<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t to tungro. IR 20, IR 26 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR 30 inherit their moderate<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce from TKM6 . Gam Pai 15 is the donor parent of the highly<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t IR 28, IR 29, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR 34. The IRRI <strong>breeding</strong> program for<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce was exp<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> screening under field conditions started in<br />
1971, Tungro resist<strong>an</strong>ce is one of the major <strong>breeding</strong> objectives in<br />
Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, B<strong>an</strong>gladesh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> India.<br />
Variety C4063 developed in the Philippines, RD5 in Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> BR41<br />
M
192 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities arid Challenges<br />
B<strong>an</strong>gladesh are moderately resist<strong>an</strong>t. In India Triveni is highly resist<strong>an</strong>t,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vijaya, Ratna, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pusa 2-21 are moderately resist<strong>an</strong>t.<br />
Several resist<strong>an</strong>ce donors, including P<strong>an</strong>khari 203, Ptb 18, Gam Pai,<br />
TKM6 , <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> HR 21, have been utilized in the resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>breeding</strong> program<br />
of IRRI since 1966-67. Most IR varieties, except IRS, IR8 , IR22,<br />
IR24, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR43 have varying levels of tungro resist<strong>an</strong>ce.- Varieties IR28,<br />
IR29, IR34, IR50, IR52, IR54, IR56, IR58, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR60 are highly resist<strong>an</strong>t.<br />
Varieties IR32, IR36, IR38, IR42, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR48 are moderately resist<strong>an</strong>t. The<br />
rice improvement program of Indonesia, Malaysia, Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, the Philippines,<br />
B<strong>an</strong>gladesh, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> India incorporate resist<strong>an</strong>ce to RTV in the improved<br />
varieties.<br />
Table 9.3<br />
Some improved pl<strong>an</strong>t typ>e varieties, tungro-resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
selections developed at IRRI from various donor parents.<br />
Donor parent Variety / Selection Cross<br />
TKM6 IR20 Peta/TN1//TKM6<br />
IR26<br />
IR24/TKM6<br />
IR30<br />
IR24/TKM6/IR20VO. nivara<br />
Gam Pai 15 IR28 PetaVTNl/Gam Pai 15/4/IR8/<br />
Taduk<strong>an</strong>//TKM6 ^<br />
/TN1////IK24VO. nivara<br />
IR29<br />
Peta^ /TNI/Gam Pai 15/4/IR8/<br />
Taduk<strong>an</strong>//TKM6 ^<br />
/TN1////IR24VO. nivara<br />
IR34<br />
Peta^ /TNI/Gam Pai 15/4/IR8/<br />
Taduk<strong>an</strong>//TKM6 *<br />
/TN1////IR24^ / 0. nivara<br />
Ptb 18 IR32 IR20^ / 0 . nivara//CR94-13<br />
1R36 IR8/Taduk<strong>an</strong>/TKM6VTN1 ///<br />
IR24^ / 0 . nivara<br />
/4/CR94-13<br />
HR21 IR2034-289-1 IR24//Mudgo/IR8///Peta3 /TNI<br />
//HR21/4/IR24VO. nivara<br />
P<strong>an</strong>khari 203 IR825-11-2 IR8 /P<strong>an</strong>kahri 203//Peta® / TNI<br />
Sigadis IR127-80-1 CP231/SIO 17//Sigadis<br />
Grassy Stunt<br />
Agati et al. (1941) described from the Philippines for the first time the<br />
symptoms of a disease that appeared to be grassy stunt. The disease first<br />
appeared on the IRRI farm in 1963 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its tr<strong>an</strong>smission by the brown<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>thopper (Nilaparvata Ingens) was demonstrated in 1964 (Rivera et al,<br />
1966). Grassy stunt has now been reported from Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka,<br />
Indonesia, India, B<strong>an</strong>gladesh, Vietnam, China, Cambodia, Laos,<br />
My<strong>an</strong>mar (Khush, 1977a). When fully developed, symptoms on the<br />
diseased pl<strong>an</strong>ts are expressed as severe stunting, excessive tillering, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>
Ram C. Chaudhary 193<br />
<strong>an</strong> erect habit. The leaves turn short; narroW; erect, pale green or pale<br />
yellow, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> often have numerous small dark brown spots of various<br />
shapes, which may form blotches. The leaves may turn green when<br />
supplied with adequate nitrogenous fertilizers (Ling, 1972), Depending<br />
on the age of the pl<strong>an</strong>t at which it is infected, the yield losses may r<strong>an</strong>ge<br />
from 0% to 100% (Ling, 1972).<br />
Etiology<br />
Since the reactions of varieties from various countries are identical, it<br />
was postulated that there is no strainal variation in the virus (Khush,<br />
1977a). Of late, virologists at IRRI Philippines have identified a new<br />
strain of the virus based on serological relationship <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> similarity in<br />
morphology, symptomatology, virus-vector interaction. This new strain<br />
has been designated as rice grassy stimt 2 (RGS V2 ) versus the original<br />
strain RGS VI. RGS V2 infected pl<strong>an</strong>ts show stunting, leaf yellowing <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
spreading growth habit. However, the symptoms may vary depending<br />
on the variety <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the age of the pl<strong>an</strong>t. Leaves of some varieties are<br />
mottled or striped <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> have irregular rusty blotches. Pl<strong>an</strong>ts infected at<br />
the seedling stage show profuse tillering <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> narrow leaves, as do pl<strong>an</strong>ts<br />
infected with RGS Vl^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> die prematurely. However, pl<strong>an</strong>ts infected at<br />
later growth stages develop symptoms indistinguishable from those<br />
caused by the tungro virus infection. Symptoms of this type are most<br />
prevalent in the field (Hibino et at, 1983).<br />
RGS V2 differs from RGS VI in pathogenicity to rice varieties. O.<br />
nivara, which is resist<strong>an</strong>t to RGS VI, is susceptible to TGS V2.<br />
Consequently, all the varieties with O. nivara resist<strong>an</strong>ce are susceptible<br />
to RGS V2 , which is prevalent in the Philippines, Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Indonesia (Hibino et aï., 1983).<br />
Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
A single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene Gd confers resist<strong>an</strong>ce to grassy stunt disease.<br />
INSECT PESTS<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> grows in hot-humid environments where insect pests also flourish<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> damage crops. More th<strong>an</strong> 100 species of insects are considered rice<br />
pests but only 20 species are of major economic import<strong>an</strong>ce. These<br />
species infest all parts of the rice pl<strong>an</strong>t at one or the other growing stage.<br />
But host-pl<strong>an</strong>t resist<strong>an</strong>ce is available only against a limited number of<br />
insect pests. Genetics of resist<strong>an</strong>ce has been reported against these pests<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> systematic <strong>breeding</strong> has been undertaken, resulting in the release of<br />
varieties resist<strong>an</strong>t to these pests.
194 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Brown Pl<strong>an</strong>thopper<br />
The brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal) is the most serious of<br />
the rice pests. The distribution of brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper (BPH) in various<br />
rice-growing countries has been listed by Flint <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Magor (1982) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Pathak <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kh<strong>an</strong> (1994). Due to, host specificity a number of biotypes of<br />
BPH developed in due course of time. Biotypes 1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 2 are widely<br />
distributed in southeast Asia. Bio type 3 is a laboratory biotype produced<br />
in the Philippines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> biotype 4 occurs in the Indi<strong>an</strong> subcontinent.<br />
D amage<br />
ilil<br />
BPH causes considerable damage by direct feeding. BPH sucks the sap<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> plugs the xylem <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> phloem with its feeding sheath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pieces of<br />
tissue pushed into these vessels during exploratory feeding. This direct<br />
feeding may result in "hopper burn" which results in 100% crop loss. In<br />
addition to the damage by feeding, it also tr<strong>an</strong>smits grassy stunt <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
ragged stunt viral diseases, which may cause 50-90% losses due to<br />
result<strong>an</strong>t high sterility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> p<strong>an</strong>icle deformation.<br />
; {i<br />
i<br />
G enetics<br />
More th<strong>an</strong> 100 resist<strong>an</strong>t cultivars have been genetically <strong>an</strong>alyzed.<br />
Athwal et al (1971) showed that the resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Mudgo, C 022, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
MTU15 was governed by the same domin<strong>an</strong>t gene, which they<br />
designated Bph-1. A single recessive gene, designated bph-2, conveyed<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce in ASD7. Bph-1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bph-2 are closely linked <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> no<br />
recombination between them has been observed. Chen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g (1971)<br />
also reported that a single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene controls resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Mudgo.<br />
Athwal <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pathak (1972) reported that MGL2 possesses Bph-1, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ptb<br />
18 possesses bph-2. Martinez <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush (1974) investigated the<br />
inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in two <strong>breeding</strong> lines of rice that originated<br />
from the crosses of susceptible parents. One of the lines, IR747B2-6,<br />
possessed Bph-1 , <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the other, IRl154-243, possessed bph-2. It was<br />
hypothesized that one of the parents, TKM6 has Bph- 1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> also <strong>an</strong><br />
inhibitory gene I-Bph-1 while some progenies segregate for these two<br />
genes due to independent recombination <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> give resist<strong>an</strong>t descend<strong>an</strong>ts.<br />
In a genetic study of 28 varieties, Lakshminaray<strong>an</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush<br />
(1977) found 9 varieties with Bph-1, lis with bph-2, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one variety with<br />
both genes. Two varieties were found to have new genes. A single<br />
domin<strong>an</strong>t gene, which conveys resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Rathu Heenati was<br />
designated as Bph-3. This gene segregates independent of Bph-1. A<br />
single recessive gene, which controls resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Babawee, was
Ram C. Chaudhary 195<br />
designated bph~4. This gene segregates independent of bph-2. Genetic<br />
<strong>an</strong>alysis of 20 resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties by Sidhu <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush (1978) revealed<br />
that 7 varieties had Bph-3/10 had bph-4/ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> resist<strong>an</strong>ce in the remaining<br />
three was governed by two genes. Sidhu <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush (1979) also reported<br />
that Bph-3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bph-4 were closely linked. Genes bph-4 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> GLH-3 were<br />
also linked with a map dist<strong>an</strong>ce of 34 units. The bph-4 gene appeared to<br />
be linked with sd-1 (recessive gene for semidwarf stature). However^<br />
bph-4 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xa4 (gene for bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce) are inherited<br />
independently. Ikeda <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> K<strong>an</strong>eda (1981) also foimd that bph-2 as well as<br />
Bph-1 segregate independent of both Bph-3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bph-4, whereas Bph-3<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bph-4 as well as Bph-1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bph-2 are closely linked. Ikeda <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
K<strong>an</strong>eda (1982) reported that Bph-1 segregated independent of the gene<br />
for dwarf virus resist<strong>an</strong>ce in K<strong>an</strong>to PL-3 as well as the gene governing<br />
stripe disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce in K<strong>an</strong>to PL-2.<br />
On the basis of trisomie <strong>an</strong>alysis, Ikeda <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> K<strong>an</strong>eda (1981) identified<br />
the loci of Bph-3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bph-4 on chromosome 10. In <strong>an</strong>other study, Ikeda<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> K<strong>an</strong>eda (1983) located Bph-1 on chromosome 4, No linkage was<br />
detected between Bph-1 on the one h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ig <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> d-11 markers on<br />
chromosome 4 on the other. However, bph- 2 was found linked with d-2,<br />
with a 39.4% recombination value. Khush et al. (1985) carried out a<br />
genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis of ARC10550. This cultivar is resist<strong>an</strong>t to BPH<br />
populations in B<strong>an</strong>gladesh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> India (biotype 4), but is susceptible to<br />
biotypes 1 ,2 , <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 3. It was found to have a single recessive gene, bph-5,<br />
for resist<strong>an</strong>ce, which segregates independent of Bph-1,. bph-2, Bph-3,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bph-4.<br />
Seventeen additional rice cultivars, resist<strong>an</strong>t to biotype 4 but<br />
susceptible to biotypes 1, 2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 3 were genetically <strong>an</strong>alzyed by Kabir<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush (1988). Seven were found to have a single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene for<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce. The domin<strong>an</strong>t gene(s) of these cultivars segregated<br />
independent of bph-5. Thé domin<strong>an</strong>t g<strong>an</strong>e of Swarnalata was designated<br />
as Bph-6 . In the remaining 10 cultivars, resist<strong>an</strong>ce is conferred by a<br />
single recessive gene. The recessive genes of eight, cultivars were found<br />
to be allelic to bph-5. However, the recessive genes of two cultivars are<br />
nonallelic to bph-5. The recessive gene of T12 was designated bph-7.<br />
Two Thai varieties. Col. 5 Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Col. 11 Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chin<br />
Saba from My<strong>an</strong>mar were reported to have single recessive genes,<br />
which are allelic to each other but are non allelic to bph-2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bph-4.<br />
Similarly cultivars Kaharm<strong>an</strong>a, Balamawee, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pokkali were found to<br />
have single domin<strong>an</strong>t genes that are allelic to each other but different<br />
from Bph-1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bph-3 (Ikeda, 1985). Since these cultivars are resist<strong>an</strong>t to<br />
bio types 1,2, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 3, compared to cultivars with bph-5, Bph- 6 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bph-7,<br />
which are susceptible, Nemoto et al (1989) concluded that the recessive<br />
gene of Col. 5 Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, Col. 7. Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chin Saba must also be<br />
1<br />
!
196 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
different from bph-5 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bph-7. They designated this gene as bph-8 .<br />
Similarly, they designated the domin<strong>an</strong>t gene of Kajharm<strong>an</strong>a,<br />
Balamawee <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pokkali as Bph-9. Several genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to the<br />
BPH have been tr<strong>an</strong>sferred from wild Oryza species to cultivated rice<br />
through wide hybridization (Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1990). Genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis to<br />
determine allelic relationships of these genes with known genes is<br />
underway. An introgression line from the cross of cultivated rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
australiensis has a domin<strong>an</strong>t gene for BPH resist<strong>an</strong>ce, which has been<br />
designated as Bph-10. Bph-10 confers resist<strong>an</strong>ce to three biotypes to<br />
BPH. The genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice varieties c<strong>an</strong> be inferred without<br />
genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis by determining their reaction to different biotypes<br />
(Table 9.4). Most of the varieties released for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH also have<br />
multiple resist<strong>an</strong>ce to various diseases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pests (Tables 9.2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 9.5).<br />
Breeding<br />
i' i<br />
Bph“l confers resist<strong>an</strong>ce to Biotypes 1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 3, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bph-2 against biotypes<br />
1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 2. Bph-3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bph-4 confer resist<strong>an</strong>ce to all known biotypes. The<br />
genes bph-5, Bph-6 , <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bph-7 confer resist<strong>an</strong>ce to Biotype 4 only, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
bph- 8 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bph-9 provide resist<strong>an</strong>ce to biotypes 1, 2, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 3 (Table 9.5),<br />
Based on these considerations, systematic <strong>breeding</strong> for resist<strong>an</strong>ce against<br />
BPH has been done in all the countries where this pest causes serious<br />
damage, These resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes provide most of the protection to the<br />
rice varieties.<br />
Sources of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH were indetified in 1967 (Pathak ei al,<br />
1969). The pagoram on <strong>breeding</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>genetics</strong> was started in 1968. Two<br />
genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce, Bph-1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bph-2 , were identified in 1970 (Athwal et<br />
al., 1971). The first resist<strong>an</strong>t variety with Bph-1, IR 26, was released in<br />
1973 (Khush, 1977a). The variety was widely accepted in the Philippines,<br />
Indonesia, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vietnam but became susceptible in 1976-1977 because of<br />
the development of biotype 2 of the BPH. By that time, varieties IR 36<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR 38 with bph- 2 gene had been developed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> released (Khush,<br />
1977b), IR 36 soon replaced IR 26 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> became the domin<strong>an</strong>t rice variety.<br />
Its resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH has held up for 14 years in most areas <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> it is still<br />
widely grown (Table 9.4). Most of the varieties released for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />
BPH, also have multiple resist<strong>an</strong>ce to various diseases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pests<br />
(Table 9.5).<br />
Incorporation of newly identified genes Bph-3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bph-4 continued<br />
after their identification. In 1982, when a biotype capable to damaging<br />
IR 36 appeared in small pockets of the Philippines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in Indonesia,<br />
IR 56 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR 60 with Bph-3 for resist<strong>an</strong>ce were released (IRRI, 1983). IR<br />
6 6 with bph-4 for resist<strong>an</strong>ce was released in 1987 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR 6 8 , IR 79, IR 72<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR 74. All with Bph-3-were released in 1988. These varieties are now<br />
widely grown in tropical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subtropical rice-growing countries. Thus,
J i<br />
Ram C. Chaudhary 197<br />
the continuous identification of new genes followed by their<br />
incorporation maintained the genetic diversity of resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
helped keep ahead of the shifting enemy, BPH.<br />
White-backed Pl<strong>an</strong>thopper<br />
White-backed pl<strong>an</strong>thopper (WBPH) Sogatella furcifera (Horvdth) is one of<br />
the major pests of rice in South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia, Pacific region, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Australia.<br />
D a m a g e<br />
Like the brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper, WBPH likewise causes considerable<br />
damage by direct feeding. WBPH sucks the sap <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> plugs the xylem <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
phloem with its feeding sheath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pieces of tissue pushed into these<br />
vessels during exploratory feeding. Direct feeding may result in "hopper<br />
burn" which results in 100% crop loss. Fortunately WBPH is not known<br />
to tr<strong>an</strong>smit <strong>an</strong>y viral diseases.<br />
Table 9.4 Interrelationships between biotypes of BPH <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> gene for resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice<br />
Variety Gene Chromosome,<br />
location<br />
Reaction to biotype<br />
1 2 3 4<br />
Mudgo Bph-1 1 2 R S R S<br />
ASD7 bph-2 4 R R S S<br />
Rathu Heenati Bph-3 1 0 R R R R<br />
Babawee bph-4 10 R R R R<br />
ARC 10550 bph-5 - S S S R<br />
Swarnalata Bph-6 - S S S R<br />
T 1 2 bph-7 - s s S R<br />
Chin Saba bph-8 - R R R -<br />
Balamawee Bph-9 - R R R -<br />
0 . australiensis Bph-lOm 1 2 R R R R<br />
TN (1) None - S S S S<br />
R : Resist<strong>an</strong>t; S : Susceptible.<br />
Table 9.5<br />
Current knowledge of varietal resist<strong>an</strong>ce against green leafhopper,<br />
zigzag leafhopper, brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> white-backed pl<strong>an</strong>thopper<br />
Insect- Resis- Chro- Reference Varietal source of resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
pest t<strong>an</strong>ce mosome<br />
(1)<br />
gene<br />
(2 )<br />
location<br />
(3) (4) (5)<br />
Green Glh-1<br />
-<br />
Athwal et al., 1971 P<strong>an</strong>khari 203<br />
leafliopper<br />
Glh-2 Athwal et al., 1971 ASD7<br />
Clh-3 10 AthwaUfaL 1971 IR8<br />
glh-4 - Siwi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush 1977 P tb 8<br />
(Contd.)
198 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Ml<br />
:| Il<br />
M!<br />
Table 9.5 Contd.<br />
Insect- Resis- Chro- Reference Varietal source of resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
pest t<strong>an</strong>ce mosome<br />
gene location<br />
(1) (2 ) (3) (4) (5)<br />
Glh~5 - Siwi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1977 ASD 8<br />
Qlh-6 5 Rezaul Karim <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pathak, TAPL # 796<br />
1982<br />
Glh-7 —■ Rezaul Karim <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pathaky Moddai Karupp<strong>an</strong><br />
1982<br />
Gih-8 -<br />
DV 85<br />
Zigzag Zlh-l “ Angeles et al., 1986 Rathu Heenati<br />
leafhopper<br />
Zlh-2 - Angeles et al., 1986 Ptb21<br />
Zlh-3 - Angeles et al., 1986 Ptb 33<br />
Brown Bph~l 12 Sidhu <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1978 Mudgo<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>thopper<br />
Bph-2 4 Sidhu <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1978 ASD7<br />
Bph-3 1 0 Lakshminaray<strong>an</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rathu Heenati<br />
Khush, 1977<br />
Bph-4 1 0 Lakshminaray<strong>an</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Babawee<br />
Khush, 1977<br />
Bph-5 - Khush et al., 1985 ARC 10550<br />
Bph-6 - Kabir <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1988 Swarnalata<br />
Bph‘7 - Kabir <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1988 T12<br />
Bph-8 . - Nemoto et aL, 1989 Chin Saba<br />
Bph-9 Nemoto et al., 1989 Pokkali<br />
Bph- 12 Khush et al., 1994 O, australiensis<br />
10(t) ..<br />
White-backed Wph-1 7 Sidhu et ai, 1979 N22<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>thopper<br />
Wph~2 . - Angeles etal., 1981 ARC 10239<br />
Wpk-3 “ Hern<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ez <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, ADR 52<br />
1981<br />
Wph-4 — Hern<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ez <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, Podiwi AB<br />
1981<br />
Wph-5 Wu<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1984 N'Di<strong>an</strong>g Marie<br />
Wph-6(t) - Min et al., 1981<br />
Gall Midge Gm-1 Chaudhary et ah, 1986 W1263,<br />
Eswarakora<br />
Gm-2 4 Chaudhary et al. 1986 Phalguna, Siam<br />
29, Leu<strong>an</strong>g 152<br />
gm-3 - Sahii et al., 1985 RP 2068-18-3-5<br />
Gm-4 (0 - Srivastava et al., 1994 Abhaya<br />
Gm-5 (0 - Srivastava et al., 1994 ARC5984<br />
Gm-6 (t) - Katiyar et al., 1995 Duok<strong>an</strong>g # 1<br />
Gm-7(t) - Reddy etaL, 1997 Bhum<strong>an</strong>s<strong>an</strong><br />
Gm-8 (t)<br />
NHTA8<br />
Gm-9 (t) - NHTA8<br />
Gm~10(t) - NHTA8<br />
Gm-11 (t)<br />
B<strong>an</strong>glei<br />
G e n e t ic s<br />
More th<strong>an</strong> 300 cultivars resist<strong>an</strong>t to WBFH have been identified <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 80<br />
of them have been <strong>an</strong>alyzed genetically. Five genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce^ one
Ram C. Chaudhary 199<br />
recessive <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> four domin<strong>an</strong>t^ have been identified. A single domin<strong>an</strong>t<br />
gene^ designated Wbph-1^ was found to convey resist<strong>an</strong>ce to the WBPH<br />
in the variety N22 (Sidhu et ah, 1979). Resist<strong>an</strong>ce in ARC 10239 is<br />
governed by a single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene designated Wbph-2 (Angeles et al.,<br />
1981). This gene segregates independently of Wbph-1. Nair et al. (1982)<br />
investigated 21 additional varieties: 19 had Wbph^l <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> two had Wbph-<br />
2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong> additional recessive gene. The resist<strong>an</strong>ce of 2 of the 14 varieties<br />
<strong>an</strong>alyzed by Hern<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ez <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush (1981) was governed by Wbph-2.<br />
Eleven varieties had a single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene each that segregated<br />
independent of Wbph-1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Wbph-2. The domin<strong>an</strong>t gene of one such<br />
variety, ADR52, was designated Wbph-3. Only one variety, Podiwi A 8 ,<br />
had a recessive gene, which was designated wbph-4. Saini et al. (1982)<br />
<strong>an</strong>alyzed 13 additional varieties. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce was governed by Wbph-1 in<br />
four varieties, Wbph-2 in six, Wbph-1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Wbph-2 in two, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a single<br />
domin<strong>an</strong>t gene in Hornamawee segregated independent of Wbph-1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Wbph-2. Wu <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush (1985) investigated the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
in 15 varieties. They found that resist<strong>an</strong>ce in nine varieties was<br />
controlled by Wbph-1, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> two genes conferred resist<strong>an</strong>ce in four<br />
varieties. The remaining two varieties had single domin<strong>an</strong>t genes for<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce, which segregated independent of Wbph-1, Wbph-2, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Wbph-3. The domin<strong>an</strong>t gene of N'Di<strong>an</strong>g Marie was designated Wbph-5.<br />
Jayaraj <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Murty (1983) studied the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in nine<br />
varieties. They found that it was controlled by a single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene in<br />
three varieties <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> by a recessive gene in six other varieties.<br />
Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in 10 cultivars was investigated by Singh et<br />
al. (1993). Eight cultivars, i.e., ARC 5838, ARC 6579, ARC 6624, ARC,<br />
ARC 10464, ARC 11321, ARC 11320, Balamawee, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR2425-90-4-3,<br />
were found to have single recessive genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce. The recessive<br />
genes of IR2415-90-4-3, ARC 5838, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ARC 11324 were found to have<br />
single recessive genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce. The recessive genes of IR2415-90-4-<br />
3, ARC 5838, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ARC 11324 were found to be allelic to each other.<br />
Resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Ptbl9 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IET6288 was found to be under domin<strong>an</strong>t gene<br />
control.<br />
Green Leafhopper<br />
Several species of green leafhopper (GLH) are rice pests but three are of<br />
economic signific<strong>an</strong>ce. Nephotetix cincticeps (Uhler) distributed in China,<br />
Jap<strong>an</strong>, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Korea is a vector of rice dwarf <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yellow dwarf. Nephotetix<br />
virescens (Dist<strong>an</strong>t) distributed in South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia is a vector of<br />
yellow dwarf, tungro, penyakit merah, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yellow-or<strong>an</strong>ge leaf.<br />
Nephotetix nigropictus is also distributed in South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia
200 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is a known vector of rice dwarf, yellow dwarf, tr<strong>an</strong>sitory yellowing,<br />
tungro, yellow-or<strong>an</strong>ge leaf, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice gall dwarf.<br />
Damage<br />
Other th<strong>an</strong> the feeding damage done by sucking, which results in<br />
reduced growth of the crop at a young stage, GLH is also .a vector of a<br />
number of viruses, which once spread c<strong>an</strong> cause serious yield losses.<br />
G enetics<br />
Athwal et ah (1971) first investigated the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />
GLH in varieties P<strong>an</strong>khari 203, ASD7, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR 8 . They found that<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce in each variety was controlled by one domin<strong>an</strong>t gene. The<br />
domin<strong>an</strong>t gene in P<strong>an</strong>khari 203 was designated Glh-1; that in ASD7,<br />
Glh-2; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that in IR 8 , Glh-3. The three genes segregated independent of<br />
each other. Siwi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush (1977) identified two more genes; one<br />
recessive designated glh-4 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the other domin<strong>an</strong>t designated Glh-5.<br />
Two domin<strong>an</strong>t genes, Glh- 6 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Glh-7, were identified by Rezaul Karim<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pathak (1982).<br />
Aveshi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush (1984) studied the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in 18<br />
varieties. Two had Glh-1, three had Glh-2 , two had Glh-3, one glh-4, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
three had two genes. The allelic relationships of the resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes of<br />
seven varieties are still not known. Ru<strong>an</strong>gsook <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush (1987)<br />
<strong>an</strong>alyzed 15 rice cultivars genetically. The resist<strong>an</strong>ce was governed by<br />
two domin<strong>an</strong>t genes in Katia Badger 13-20, Laki 659, Las<strong>an</strong>e, Asmaita,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Choron Bawala, but by single domin<strong>an</strong>t genes in the remaining 10<br />
cultivars. Later it was found that one of the two domin<strong>an</strong>t genes of<br />
Choron Bawla is allelic to Glh-2. The single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene in Chiknaql<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one of the two domin<strong>an</strong>t genes of Laki 659 are allelic to Glh-3. The<br />
second of the two domin<strong>an</strong>t genes of Katia Badger 13-20, Laki 659, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Las<strong>an</strong>e are allelic to Glh-5. The two domin<strong>an</strong>t genes of Asmaita <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene of Hashikalmi, Ghaiya, ARC 10313, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Garia are<br />
nonallelic to <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> independent of Glh-1, Glh-2, Glh-3, glh-4, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Glh-5.<br />
Tomar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tomar (1987) studied the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in 11<br />
cultivars. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce in eight cultivars was found to be governed by<br />
single domin<strong>an</strong>t genes, while single recessive genes conferred resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
in the three other cultivars. Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce studies of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in 12<br />
cultivars by Gh<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush (1988) revealed single domin<strong>an</strong>t genes in<br />
six cultivars, two independent domin<strong>an</strong>t genes in four cultivars, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
single recessive genes in two other cultivars. The single recessive gene in<br />
ARC 7012 is allelic to glh-4 but that in DV85 is nonallelic to <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> independent<br />
of glh-4. The recessive gene was designated glh-8 .
Ram C. Chaudhary 201<br />
Breeding<br />
A large number of donors have been used to breed resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties<br />
against GLH. Earlier varieties released by IRRI Philippines/ e.g. IR5/ IRS,<br />
IR20; IR24/ IR26, IR30 had the Glh-3 gene. Other genes, e.g. glh-4 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Glh-5, have also been used. As a result of continuous <strong>breeding</strong> effort to<br />
introduce more th<strong>an</strong> one gene into the newly developing varieties, a<br />
large number of varieties <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lines have become available with a good<br />
degree of resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Some of the varieties bred by IRRI using various<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes are given in Tables 9.2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 9.5.<br />
Zigzag Leafhopper<br />
The zigzag leafhopper, Recilia dorsalis {Motschulsky) is so known not<br />
because of its damage pattern but rather the zigzag coloring pattern on<br />
the wings of adults. The zigzag leafhopper (ZLH) is distributed<br />
throughout South Asi<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asi<strong>an</strong> countries.<br />
Damage<br />
The zigzag leafhopper, Recilia dorsalis (Motschulsky) is a leafhopper not<br />
so much known for serious damage due to sucking of pl<strong>an</strong>t sap but as a<br />
vector of serious viral diseases such as gall dwarf, tungro, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yellowor<strong>an</strong>ge<br />
leaf virus.<br />
Genetics<br />
The <strong>genetics</strong> of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to the zigzag leafhopper (ZLH) was<br />
investigated by Angeles et at (1986) in such cultivars as Rathu Heenati,<br />
Ptb21, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ptb33. Single domin<strong>an</strong>t genes that segregate independent of<br />
each other <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> conveyed resist<strong>an</strong>ce to ZLH damage were designated<br />
Zlh-1 (Rathu Heenati), Zlh-2 (Ptb21), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zlh-3 (Ptb33) are. Tests for<br />
independence of various genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to leaf <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>thoppers<br />
revealed that Zlh-1, Zlh-2, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zlh-3 are independent of Wbph-3. Zlh-2<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zlh-3 also segregated independent of bph-2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bph-3.<br />
Gall Midge<br />
The rice gall midge, Orseolia oryzae {Wood-Mctöon) is a serious pest of rice<br />
in certain areas of South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia. It has been reported from<br />
B<strong>an</strong>gladesh, China, India, Indonesia, Laos, My<strong>an</strong>mar, Nepal, Pakist<strong>an</strong>,<br />
Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka, Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vietnam. In Africa, <strong>an</strong>other species of gall<br />
midge, Orseolia oryzivora (Harris <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Gagne), damages the crop, but is not<br />
a serious pest. It is reported to occur in Cameroon, Gh<strong>an</strong>a, the Ivory<br />
Coast, Liberia, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sud<strong>an</strong>. Both species
H.-:<br />
202 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
require high humidity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thus lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rices are damaged more th<strong>an</strong><br />
upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>.<br />
Damage<br />
The Asi<strong>an</strong> rice gall midge (GM) Orseolia oryzae {Wood-Mason) is a serious<br />
pest in m<strong>an</strong>y countries of South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia, causing 10-100%<br />
yield losses. The characteristic symptom of attack is a long, hollow,<br />
tubular gall commonly called a "silver shoot", a response to a secretion<br />
of the salivary gl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s containing "cecidogen", which causes<br />
proliferation of cells at the site of feeding. The larvae feed on the<br />
growing point of the tiller <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the growing tiller is converted into a<br />
tubular gall. Tillers with silver shoots do not produce p<strong>an</strong>icles <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> dry<br />
off. In addition, GM induces the prolonged tillering, delays flowering,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reduces the number of ears bearing tillers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 1 , 0 0 0 grain weight as<br />
well as yield. The existence of differential biotypes based on differential<br />
varietal reaction has been known for some time.<br />
Afric<strong>an</strong> rice gall rpidge is yet <strong>an</strong>other pest but with a similar mode of<br />
damage that occurs in several Afric<strong>an</strong> countries. Only limited<br />
information on the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of varietal resist<strong>an</strong>ce against it is<br />
available.<br />
Genetics<br />
In India, six biotypes have been characterized to date (J. Bentur, pers,<br />
comm.). Gall Midge biotype (GMB) 1 is confined to central Andhra<br />
Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> parts of Orissa. GMB 2 is confined to<br />
coastal Orissa, while GMB 3 is distributed in Northern Teleng<strong>an</strong>a of<br />
Andhra Pradesh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> southern Bihar. Biotype GMB 4 is widely distributed<br />
in the northern coastal areas of Andhra Pradesh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vidarbha<br />
of Maharashtra. GMB 5 has limited distribution in Kutt<strong>an</strong>ad area of<br />
Kerala, GMB 6 is distributed in M<strong>an</strong>ipur <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is believed to be present in<br />
other neighboring countries.<br />
Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to gall midge has been postulated to be due to two genes<br />
in W1263 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> four genes in Ptbl8 (Shastry et aL, 1972). Sastry <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Prakasa Rao (1973) inferred the presence of three recessive genes for<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce in W1263 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W12708. Saty<strong>an</strong>arayaiah <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reddi (1972),<br />
however, convincingly showed that resist<strong>an</strong>ce in W1263 is governed by<br />
a single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene. Two to three domin<strong>an</strong>t complementary genes<br />
for resist<strong>an</strong>ce (Sastry et ah, 1984) govern resist<strong>an</strong>ce in CR57-MR-1523.<br />
Chaudhary et al. (1986) studied the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in five<br />
cultivars, all of which were found to have a single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene for<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Allele tests revealed that Usha, Samridhi, W1263 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> BD6-1<br />
have the same gene for resist<strong>an</strong>ce, which was designated Gm-1. Surekha,<br />
Phalguna <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IET6285 have the same gene for resist<strong>an</strong>ce, which is
Ram C. Chaudhary 203<br />
nonallelic to <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> independent of Gm-1; this gene was designated Gm-2,<br />
Kalode et al. (1976) found different reactions of W1263 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> JBS 446 at<br />
two locations, indicating biotypic variation in gall midge. The gene gm-<br />
3 (t) was reported from variety RP 2068-18-3-5. Variety Abhaya was<br />
released with yet <strong>an</strong>other gene, designated Gm-4(t). The gene Gm-5 (t)<br />
was reported from variety ARC 5984, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the gene Gm- 6 (t) from<br />
Duok<strong>an</strong>g No. 1. Variety Bhum<strong>an</strong>s<strong>an</strong> was reported to have two genes,<br />
Gm-7 (t) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Gm- 8 (t). Similarly, NHTA 8 was reported to have two<br />
genes, namely Gm-9 (t) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Gm-lO(l). Recently, the gene Gm- 1 1 was<br />
reported from variety B<strong>an</strong>glei.<br />
Breeding<br />
The existence of biotype <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its geographic distribution, complexity of<br />
reaction, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> damage has made <strong>breeding</strong> of resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties difficult.<br />
Still a number of varieties have been developed that are resist<strong>an</strong>t to a<br />
number of biotypes.<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>ting a resist<strong>an</strong>t variety is the most effective me<strong>an</strong>s of preventing<br />
gall midge damage. Differences in varietal susceptibility to this pest<br />
were reported as early as 1922 in Vietnam, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in 1927 in India. Several<br />
rice improvement programs of B<strong>an</strong>gladesh, India, Indonesia, Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are currently screening varieties <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> have a regular<br />
<strong>breeding</strong> program for resist<strong>an</strong>ce. In India, several rice varieties, such as<br />
Eswarakora, HR42, HR63, Ptb 18, Ptb 21, Siam 29, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Thai variety<br />
Leung 152, were found highly resist<strong>an</strong>t. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to gall midge is<br />
reported to be primarily due to <strong>an</strong>tibiosis. Larval development is<br />
retarded on resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties but is normal on susceptible varieties.<br />
Genes Gm-2, Gm-4(t), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> GM6 -(t) have been tagged to molecular<br />
markers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thus it should be possible to start maker-aided selection.<br />
This will also solve the problems of screening varieties against all the<br />
biotypes of gall midge, as their collection at one location is forbidden Q.<br />
Bentur, pers. comm.).<br />
Stem Borer<br />
The stem borers of rice belong to the order Lepidoptera, principally the<br />
families of Pyralidae <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Noctuidae. Thirty-five pyralids belonging to<br />
12 genera, 10 noctuid species belonging to 3 genera, 5 diopsid species<br />
belonging to the genus Diopsis have been recorded as rice stem borers<br />
(Chaudhary et ah, 1984; Pathak <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kh<strong>an</strong>, 1994). Five of these—^yellow<br />
borer {Scirpophaga incertulus Walker), striped borer {Chilo suppressalis<br />
Walker), white borer {Scirpophaga innotata Walker), dark-headed borer<br />
{Chilo polychrysus Meyrick), pink borer {Sesamia inferens Walker)— are of<br />
economic signific<strong>an</strong>ce in Asia. The yellow borer is primarily distributed
204 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
in the tropics, but also occurs in temperate areas where temperature<br />
remains above 100“C <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rainfall above 1,000 mm. In Afric<strong>an</strong> countries,<br />
stalked-eyed fly (Diopsis macrophthalma)' <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Afric<strong>an</strong> white-heads<br />
{Malirpha separatella) are the major stem borer species causing extensive<br />
damage. In the Americ<strong>an</strong> continent. South Americ<strong>an</strong> white borer {Rupela<br />
albinella) is the major stem borer species.<br />
DAMAGE<br />
iNl<br />
In Asia, the yellow borer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the striped borer are the major pests <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
widely distributed from India to Jap<strong>an</strong>. They are reported to be<br />
responsible for a steady <strong>an</strong>nual damage of 5-10% of the rice crop with<br />
local catastrophic outbreaks of 60% damage (Jepson, 1954). All the<br />
species, except the pink borer, which lays eggs between the leaf sheath<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the stem instead of on the leaf blade, have the same mode of life<br />
history. Eggs hatch after one week <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> within one or two days firstinstar<br />
larvae migrate to between the leaf sheath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the stem where they<br />
feed on the sheath. During the second instar, they bore inside the stem<br />
where they feed inside the lumen. Pathak (1968) described the damage<br />
caused by borers as follows: the initial boring <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> feeding by the larvae<br />
in the leaf sheath causes broad longitudinal whitish discolored areas at<br />
the feeding sites, but rarely results in wilting <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> drying of the leaf<br />
blades. About a week after hatching, the larvae cease feeding on the leaf<br />
sheath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bore into the stem <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> feed on the inner tissue of stem walls.<br />
Such feeding frequently results in severing of the apical parts of the<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t from the point of damage. When this kind of damage occurs<br />
during the vegetative phase of the pl<strong>an</strong>t, the central whorl of leaves does<br />
not unfold, turns brownish <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> dries, while the lower leaves remain<br />
healthy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> green. This condition is known as "dead-heart" <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
affected tillers die without bearing p<strong>an</strong>icles. Larvae feeding above the<br />
primordia some times cause "dead-hearts" but if no further damage<br />
occurs, the severed portions get pushed out by new growth.<br />
After p<strong>an</strong>icle initiation, severing of the growing pl<strong>an</strong>t parts from the<br />
base results in drying of the p<strong>an</strong>icles. These p<strong>an</strong>icles may not emerge at<br />
all. Those that do emerge produce no grains <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> remain straight <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
appear whitish; they are called "white-heads" When the larvae at the<br />
base damage the newly emerged p<strong>an</strong>icles, partially filled grains are<br />
formed. Pl<strong>an</strong>ts c<strong>an</strong> compensate for a low percentage of "dead-hearts"<br />
but for every percent of "white-heads" 1-3% of yield loss may be<br />
expected (Pathak et at, 1971). Although stem-borer damage becomes<br />
evident only as "dead-hearts" or "white-heads", yet signific<strong>an</strong>t losses<br />
result from the feeding of larvae within the stem without severing the<br />
growing point (Catling <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Islam, 1981) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reduction in pl<strong>an</strong>t vigor<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yield.
Ram C. Chaudhary 205<br />
Genetics<br />
The available donors only have a moderate degree of resist<strong>an</strong>ce (Table<br />
9.6) on the st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard scoring system (INGER, 1995) Under field<br />
conditions^ a number of scapes occur resulting into misclassification of<br />
susceptible pl<strong>an</strong>ts as resist<strong>an</strong>t. An additional complication in inherit<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
studies occurs ,due to various types of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in different varieties^<br />
starting from morphological to <strong>an</strong>atomical to biochemical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>tibiosis.<br />
Therefore^ conclusive studies on the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to stem<br />
borer resist<strong>an</strong>ce are hard to come by.<br />
Apparently, the only information on <strong>genetics</strong> of resist<strong>an</strong>ce available<br />
earlier th<strong>an</strong> 1964 (Pathak, 1964) was that of Koshiary et al. (1957) who<br />
crossed Giza 14, a resist<strong>an</strong>t variety, with Sydney A. Based on the study<br />
of p2 pl<strong>an</strong>ts <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> F3 progenies, they suggested the resist<strong>an</strong>ce to be under<br />
polygenic control. The polygenic nature of inherit<strong>an</strong>ce was also reported<br />
in variety Chi<strong>an</strong><strong>an</strong> 2 in crosses with Rexoro (Pathak, 1970; IRRI, 1973).<br />
Athwai <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pathak (1972) investigated the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />
the striped borer by studying the body weight of larvae fed on the F2<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the dead-heart" counts in Rexoro/TKM 6 cross. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce,<br />
i.e., low body weight, was domin<strong>an</strong>t in F^; in F2 about 75% larvae had<br />
low body weight. Thus it was concluded that resist<strong>an</strong>ce was a simply<br />
inherited trait. But the "dead-heart" counts of the F2 progenies in the<br />
field did not show a definite pattern of segregation although the<br />
reaction was domin<strong>an</strong>t; thus it was concluded that several genes for<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce might be involved.<br />
Based on the logic of increasing the level of resist<strong>an</strong>ce in <strong>breeding</strong><br />
lines, Khush (1977b) concluded that the gene action for striped borer<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce was additive.<br />
Breeding<br />
During the last 40 years, large numbers of germplasm have been<br />
screened against various species of stem borers. Details for various<br />
species, screening done in various countries, etc. are reviewed by<br />
Chaudhary et al. (1984), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kh<strong>an</strong> et al. (1991). Extensive screenings<br />
have been done for resist<strong>an</strong>ce against striped borer. A generalized<br />
scoring system, which is widely followed (INGER, 1995) for scoring<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce, has been given in Table 9.6. Most varieties now being<br />
developed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> released have a good degree of resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> even<br />
multiple resist<strong>an</strong>ce (see Table 9,2).<br />
International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (IRRI)<br />
Work on <strong>breeding</strong> for resist<strong>an</strong>ce of the striped borer at IRRI was initiated<br />
in 1966. Several donors were crossed with improved pl<strong>an</strong>t type<br />
germplasm. M<strong>an</strong>y improved <strong>breeding</strong> lines with resist<strong>an</strong>ce similar to or
206 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Table 9.6 Scoring system of damage due to stem borer (based on SES, INGER, 1995).<br />
Score Dead-hearts % White-heads % Description<br />
0 0% 0 % Highly resist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
1 1- 1 0% 1-5% Resist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
3 1 1 - 2 0 % 6- 1 0 % Moderately resist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
5 21-30% 11-15% Moderately susceptible<br />
7 31-60% 16-25% Susceptible<br />
9 61% <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> above 26% <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> above Highly susceptible<br />
U<br />
better th<strong>an</strong> that of their donor parents including multiple disease <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
insect resist<strong>an</strong>ce were developed. Because the donors were related, it<br />
was assumed that they had different genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Based on this<br />
assumption, a program was initiated in 1972 to accumulate genes for<br />
different sources to develop improved germplasm by diailel selective<br />
mating (DSM) as proposed by Jensen (1970). The method involves: (1)<br />
crossing a number of moderately resist<strong>an</strong>t parents in all possible<br />
combinations; (2 ) intercrossing the Fj populations so obtained in all<br />
possible combinations; (3) screening the double crossed Fj progeny for<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce; (4) intercrossing the pl<strong>an</strong>ts found, to have better resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
th<strong>an</strong> either of the parents. The crossing, screening, selection <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
recrossing are continued until minor genes from different sources are<br />
accumulated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the intensity of the trait is built up. The DSM is a type<br />
of recurrent selection involving a broad gene pool, breaking linkages,<br />
freeing of genetic variability <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fostering of genetic recombination.<br />
Striped borer: Breeding for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to striped borer at IRRI started<br />
in 1965 when IR 8 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Feta *3/TN l were crossed with TKM. By 1968 a<br />
number of progenies, e.g. IR532E239, IR532E257, IR532E576 (released as<br />
IR20 later) with superior resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yield had been identified. A<br />
number of crosses such as IR7474, IR1330, IR1514A, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR1561 were<br />
made to incorporate striped borer resist<strong>an</strong>ce into good agronomic<br />
background (IRRI, 1971). In the following years, a number of progenies<br />
from multiple crosses of moderately resist<strong>an</strong>t lines were screened (IRRI,<br />
1972, 1973, 1974), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> several <strong>breeding</strong> lines from progenies of IR1702,<br />
IR2031, IR2058, IR2061, IR2070, IR2071, IR2151, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR2153 crosses were<br />
identified as having a good degree of resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Some of the promising<br />
lines were released as IR28, IR32, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR34 (IRRI, 1975, 1976). One<br />
<strong>breeding</strong> line, IR4442-207-2-3, was found to have the best level of<br />
' resist<strong>an</strong>ce apparently combined from TKM6 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CR94-13,<br />
A DSM system was started in 1972 to accumulate genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
from seven different <strong>breeding</strong> lines, namely CR94-13, IR5-156<br />
(Mehr<strong>an</strong> 69), IR1365-83-2-5-3, IRl 416-131-5-2-3, IR1514A-E666, IR1561-<br />
228-3-3, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IRl721-11-13-25. Another group of crosses were made<br />
using the same scheme, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> three cycles of selective mating produced<br />
superior donors (IRRI, 1976).
Ram C. Chaudhary 207<br />
Yellow borer: The <strong>breeding</strong> program for yellow borer resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
started after 1972 when screen-house techniques for screening were<br />
developed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> some donors were identified. Three improved pl<strong>an</strong>t type<br />
lines-IR1721-ll/ IR1917-3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IRl820-52-2—were found resist<strong>an</strong>t. IR<br />
1820-52-2 had a higher level of resist<strong>an</strong>ce th<strong>an</strong> all the previously known<br />
donors though none of its parents were known for their resist<strong>an</strong>ce (IRRI^<br />
1976). IR34 was released as a moderately resist<strong>an</strong>t variety in 1975^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
moderately resist<strong>an</strong>t lines IR2071-625-1-252 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR2070-414-3-9 were<br />
released by the Philippine government as IR36 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR40 respectively in<br />
1976. Such efforts were also reported later.<br />
A new <strong>breeding</strong> approach to upgrade the level of stem borer resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
was adopted in 1980^ using the male-sterility-facilitated-composite<br />
(MSFC) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> male-sterility-facilitated-recurrent-selection (MSRS) scheme<br />
(Chaudharyj, 1981). Genetic male sterile IR36ms was used as the female<br />
parent to cross with 26 known donors of yellow borer resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a<br />
composite population was created by mixing the seed of each single<br />
cross in equal amoiints. The composite was grown during the 1982 dry<br />
season in such a way so as to synchronize the maximum tillering phase<br />
with the peak population of yellow stem borer. It was assumed that<br />
under heavy pressure only those pl<strong>an</strong>ts with a good degree of resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
would come to heading <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> contribute pollen for seed setting on the<br />
male sterile pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Only the seeds set on the male sterile pl<strong>an</strong>ts were<br />
harvested to start the next cycle (Chaudhary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1990).<br />
India<br />
Beginning in 1964/ TKM6 / CBl, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CB2 were used as resist<strong>an</strong>t donors<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a large number of crosses were made with semidwarf high-yielding<br />
varieties as well as with local improved lines (Roy et aL, 1971). Stem<br />
borer resist<strong>an</strong>ce trials were started in 1968 with entries em<strong>an</strong>ating from<br />
TKM6 / IR532/ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Eswarakora <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> continued until 1975 with newer<br />
(AICRIP 1969/ 1975) entries from such donors as Ptbl8 / ptb21/ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Eswarakora, But TKM appeared in the percentage of 85.9% entries.<br />
Jag<strong>an</strong>nath was the first resist<strong>an</strong>t variety released in the post-IR8 era. It<br />
was followed by a series of resist<strong>an</strong>t entries: Cauvery/ Ratna, Vijaya,<br />
Pusa 2-21/ Hamsa/ Rajendra/ Phalguna/ Supriya/ Kumar/ Parijat/ Saket 4<br />
in various states of India (Seetharam<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sobha R<strong>an</strong>i/1979).<br />
Other Countries<br />
Varietal development for stem borer resist<strong>an</strong>ce depended in several<br />
countries primarily on introductions. In B<strong>an</strong>gladesh/ <strong>breeding</strong> lines such<br />
as IR20/ Ch<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ina/ (IR532-1-176)/ Purbachi (Chen-chu Ai I)/ IR28/ lET<br />
2845/ lET 5540, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR580 were introduced, international testing of the<br />
known resist<strong>an</strong>t lines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> varieties commenced in 1976 in the form of<br />
the International <strong>Rice</strong> Stem Borer Nursery (IRSBN) with 6 8 entries. The
208 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
trial was continued for over a decade <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> served a useful purpose of<br />
testing <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> making the resist<strong>an</strong>t donors globally available (INGER1995),<br />
i<br />
i<br />
M a n a g e m e n t o f s t e m b o r e r u s in g m o d e r a t e l y r e s is t a n t v a r ie t ie s<br />
Since none of the commercially available varieties have a very high level<br />
of resist<strong>an</strong>ce, m<strong>an</strong>agement of the stem borer using moderately resist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
varieties appears to be a bright possibility. The import<strong>an</strong>ce of moderate<br />
level of resist<strong>an</strong>ce was demonstrated in a study of the population growth<br />
of the striped borer at IRRI (IRRI, 1972). IR20 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Taitung 16 were used<br />
as the resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rexoro as the susceptible one. Taitung 16<br />
has <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>tibiosis type of resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Fewer larvae survived on Taitung 16<br />
th<strong>an</strong> on ÏR20 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rexoro (Table 9.7), Survival on Taitung 16 declined<br />
with each subsequent generation. The larvae raised on IR20 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Taitung<br />
16 were smaller th<strong>an</strong> those on Rexoro (Table 97), Consequently, the<br />
moths reared on these two varieties were smaller <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> laid fewer eggs.<br />
Also, larvae reared on these two varieties produced fewer female moths.<br />
Although the varieties had the same number of larvae at the start, the<br />
fourth generation moths produced 82 times more eggs on Rexoro<br />
compared on Taitung 16. Combined effects of these factors produced<br />
much lower borer population (IRRI, 1972).<br />
Table 9.7<br />
Population growth of the striped stem borer (SSB) on selected rice varieties,<br />
(susceptible) Rexoro, (resist<strong>an</strong>t) 1R20 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Taitung 16 (IRRI, 1972).<br />
<strong>Rice</strong><br />
variety<br />
Generation<br />
of<br />
SSB<br />
Survival<br />
(%)<br />
Avg. wt(mg)<br />
Larva<br />
Pupa<br />
Days for<br />
50%<br />
pupation<br />
Sex<br />
ratio<br />
Egg<br />
masses/<br />
female<br />
Eggs/<br />
mass<br />
Rexoro 1 72.0 87.4 27 m 5.1<br />
2 - 68,3 63.9 30 1.09 3.5 19.1<br />
3 ■68.9 63.1 71.6 27 1.17 4.9 23.9<br />
4 69,8 85.9 71.4 28 1.16 4.2 2 2 .8<br />
IR20 1 69.7 - 43.5 26 1.09 4.8<br />
2 - 48,6 46.0 30 1.06 2.4 14.1<br />
3 67.0 45,2 47.0 29 1.06 2 .8 16.4<br />
4 64.8 54.2 47.6 29 1.06 2.9 15.4<br />
Taitung 1 49.2 30.8 32.5 30 1.08 •4.7 19.3<br />
16 2 52.0 34.3 31.3 31 1.09 2 .8 15,6<br />
3 41.6 28.5 40 1.09 2.7 13.3<br />
4 17.5 25.7 42 1.09 2.5 11.3<br />
FUTURE DIRECTION<br />
The next millenium will witness some of the toughest challenges in rice<br />
supply for the growing populace. The present production has to be
Ram C. Ghaudhary 209<br />
doubled in the next 10 years using less l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, water, labor <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chemicals<br />
(fertilizers, pesticides, fungicides, bactericides, etc.). The socioeconomj-c<br />
situation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> environmental consciousness will impose these<br />
production constraints. Above all, stability in the production has to be<br />
added on a sustainable basis. The sum total of the given scenario dictates<br />
that host-pl<strong>an</strong>t resist<strong>an</strong>ce will have to receive top priority.<br />
On the positive side, newer tools provided by biotechnology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
related developments will make the identification <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of more<br />
potent genes easier. Some of the developments are briefly described<br />
below.<br />
(a) Gene pools for potent genes: Traditionally, the rice gene pool<br />
consists of wild species, weed races> l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> races, cultivars, <strong>breeding</strong><br />
stocks, released varieties, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> induced mut<strong>an</strong>ts. All these types of<br />
germplasm c<strong>an</strong> be considered as primary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> secondary types (Harl<strong>an</strong><br />
artd De Wet, 1971). The primary gene pool consists of about 150,000<br />
accessions of l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> races, varieties, weed races, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 4 wild species, viz.<br />
0 . nivara, O.rufipog<strong>an</strong>, O. barthii, O. longistaminata (Table 9.8). The secondary<br />
gene pool consists of O. punctata, O. officinaliis, O. eichingeri, O.<br />
minuta, O. latifolia, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. hrachy<strong>an</strong>tha, Th.e tertiary gene pool consists of<br />
more dist<strong>an</strong>tly related species such as 0 . meyeri<strong>an</strong>a, O. ridleyi, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
species belonging to related genera such as Leersia hex<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ra, Porteresia<br />
coarctata which are difficult to cross using conventional me<strong>an</strong>’s. In the<br />
not too dist<strong>an</strong>t future, these could be targeted using biotechnological<br />
tools already available.<br />
(b) Conventional <strong>breeding</strong> methods: While no major shift is expected<br />
in the traditional <strong>breeding</strong> methods such as pure line selection, mass<br />
selection, hybridization <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> selection using the pedigree method, bulk<br />
method, single-seed descent, back cross <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mutation, emphasis will be<br />
placed on a few novel ones. Breeding methods such as male-sterilityfacilitated-recurrent<br />
selection (Chaudhary et ah, 1981; Chaudhary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Khush, 1990), wide hybridization (Brar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1991), markerraided<br />
selection (T<strong>an</strong>ksley, 1983), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hybrid rice <strong>breeding</strong> will hold center<br />
stage (Yu<strong>an</strong>, 1993; Virm<strong>an</strong>i, 1994). Newer tools such as somaclonal<br />
variation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic engineering (Khush, 1998) will find more<br />
prominent use.<br />
(c) Wide hybridization: Wild species are more resist<strong>an</strong>t or sometimes<br />
immune (Devadath, 1983) to various insect pests <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> diseases but<br />
the tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes to cultivated rice posed problems<br />
through conventional me<strong>an</strong>s (Khush <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Brar, 1991). But methods<br />
became available whereby a number of very useful genes have been<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sferred from wild species to cultivated rice (Table 9.8). Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Khush, 1990, Mult<strong>an</strong>i et ah, 1994). Such tr<strong>an</strong>sfers will speed up with the<br />
identification more resist<strong>an</strong>t genes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> potent tools to aid the tr<strong>an</strong>sfer.
210 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Table 9.8<br />
Genes for disease ai\d insect resist<strong>an</strong>ce tr<strong>an</strong>sferred from wild species<br />
into cultivated rice<br />
Alien donor Genome Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to Reference<br />
Oryza australiensis EE Bacterial blight <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> BPFi Ishii et ah, 1994<br />
Oryza bracHy<strong>an</strong>tha FF Yellow stem borer Khush etal., 1994<br />
Oryza latifolia CCDD Bacterial blight, BPH<br />
Am<strong>an</strong>te ei ah, 1992<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tungro<br />
Oryza longistaminata Bacterial blight Devadath, 1983<br />
Oryza minuta BBCC Brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper<br />
Am<strong>an</strong>te et ah, 1992<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sheath blight<br />
Oryza nivara AA Grassy stunt virus resist<strong>an</strong>ce Khush, 1977<br />
Oryza offici<strong>an</strong>lis c c BPH, WBPH <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tungro Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1990<br />
Oryza ridleyi Unknown Tungro <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yellow stem borer Khush et ah, 1994<br />
Í'<br />
1<br />
Ü<br />
; : 1<br />
: 1<br />
■¡': ' !'<br />
hi- !^:<br />
IT<br />
1T<br />
liir<br />
iI :<br />
J ^!<br />
(d) Marker-aided selection: Marker-aided selection helps in th<br />
cases in which the resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene under reference is tightly liked with<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t morphological traits so that the resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the morphological<br />
trait segregate together in the <strong>breeding</strong> population. Pl<strong>an</strong>ts selected on<br />
the basis of a morphological trait are automatically resist<strong>an</strong>t. Such<br />
situations are seldom encoimtered, however. But the molecular markers<br />
(isozymes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> restriction fragment lengths polymorphisms, IRFLPs) are<br />
very useful (Mackill <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bonm<strong>an</strong>, 1992) for tagging genes of economic<br />
import<strong>an</strong>ce. They differ from morphological markers in several respects<br />
(T<strong>an</strong>ksley, 1983):<br />
(i) The genotypes of molecular loci c<strong>an</strong> be determined at the whole<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t, tissue, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cellular levels. The phenotypes of most<br />
morphological markers c<strong>an</strong> only be distinguished at the whole<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t level.<br />
(ii) A relatively large number of naturally occurring alleles is found<br />
at molecular loci. Distinguishable alleles at morphological marker<br />
loci occur less frequently.<br />
(hi) Usually deleterious effects are associated with alternate alleles of<br />
molecular markers. Undesirable phenotypic effects, on the other<br />
h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, often accomp<strong>an</strong>y morphological markers.<br />
(iv)<br />
possible genotypes to be distinguished in <strong>an</strong>y segregating<br />
generation. Alleles at morphological marker loci usually interact<br />
in a domin<strong>an</strong>t-recessive m<strong>an</strong>ner, prohibiting their use in m<strong>an</strong>y<br />
crosses.<br />
(V) With morphological marker loci, strong epistatic effects limit the<br />
number of segregating markers that c<strong>an</strong> be unequivocally scored<br />
in the same segregating generation. With molecular markers, very<br />
few epistatic or pleitropic effects are observed.<br />
If<br />
markers c<strong>an</strong> be tagged (Table 9,9), selection efficiency c<strong>an</strong> be increased
Ram C. Chaudhary 211<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the time <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> money spent on selections c<strong>an</strong> be minimized. The<br />
presence or absence of the associated molecular marker would indicate^<br />
at a very early stage^ the presence or absence of the desired gene.<br />
Co domin<strong>an</strong>ce of the molecular marker allows all possible genotypes to<br />
foe identified in <strong>an</strong>y <strong>breeding</strong> scheme even if the economic gene c<strong>an</strong>not<br />
be scored directly. A tight linkage (less th<strong>an</strong> 5 cM) is necessary for<br />
tagging a gene with a single molecular marmer. For a gene-tagging<br />
approach to be successful, molecular markers placed at. intervals of less<br />
th<strong>an</strong> 5 cM throughout the genome are required. Isozyme markers are<br />
not numerous enough in <strong>an</strong>y crop to inark the whole genome. However,<br />
RFLP markers are numerous <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> saturated maps c<strong>an</strong> be prepared<br />
(BChush et al, 1994). In a number of cases, resist<strong>an</strong>ce to insects is<br />
qu<strong>an</strong>titative <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is governed by polygenes (Khush et al., 1994). In such<br />
c^ses, it is import<strong>an</strong>t to establish linkage between the molecular markers<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the polygenes (qu<strong>an</strong>tative trait loci or QTL) to help in the selection.<br />
(e) Genetic engineering: Tools of genetic engineering are most potent<br />
to tr<strong>an</strong>sfer resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes from incompatible crosses <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> unrelated<br />
genera or species or even synthetic genes. Tr<strong>an</strong>sgeiiic pl<strong>an</strong>ts may be<br />
produced using tools such as agrobacterium-mediated tr<strong>an</strong>sformation,<br />
electroporation, biolistic method, gene gun or projectile bombardment,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> microinjection. The Bt gene has already been tr<strong>an</strong>sferred in rice<br />
(Khush, 1998) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of a number of novel genes is still<br />
underway. The Bt gene is known to be effective in controlling the striped<br />
stem borer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the leaf folder.<br />
Table 9.9<br />
List of resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes in rice tagged with molecular markers<br />
Gene<br />
Resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
to<br />
Donor variety<br />
Chromosome<br />
location<br />
Reference<br />
Bph-10 (t) BPH 0 . australiensis 12 Ishii et al, 1994<br />
Gm-2 Gall midge Siam 29 4 Moh<strong>an</strong> etal, 1994<br />
Hbv Hoja bl<strong>an</strong>ca F<strong>an</strong>ny 12 see Khush et al, 1994<br />
Pi-2 (t) Blast LAC 23 11 Xu etal, 1991<br />
Pi-2 (t) Blast 5173 6 Yu et al, 1991<br />
Pi-4 (t) Blast Tetep 12 Yu et al, 1991<br />
Pi-?(t) Blast IRAT13 4 CIAT, 1991<br />
Pi-sm Blast Moroberek<strong>an</strong> 4 W<strong>an</strong>g, 1994<br />
Pi-zh Blast Zhaiyeqing 8 see Khush et al, 1994<br />
Wph-1 WBPH N 22 7 McCouch, 1990<br />
Xa-1 BB Kogyku 4 Yoshimura et al, 1992<br />
Xa-2 BB Tetep 4 Yoshimura etal, 1992<br />
Xa-3 BB Chogoku45 11 Yoshimura et al, 1992<br />
Xa-4 BB IR20 11 Yoshimura et al, 1992<br />
xa-5 BB IR1545-339 5 McCouch et al, 1991<br />
Xa-W BB CAS 209 11 see Khush et al, 1994<br />
Ka-21 BB O. hngistamimta Ronald et al, 1992
212 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
!íi í'<br />
References<br />
Adair, C.R. 1991. Tech. Bull USDA 171.<br />
Aga ti, J.A., Sisón, P.L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Abalos, R. 1941. Philipp.}. Agrie 12:197-210.<br />
AICRIP (All India Coordí<strong>an</strong>ted <strong>Rice</strong> Improvement P r o j e c t , 1 9 6 9 , Report, Vols. l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ll,<br />
ICAR, New Delhi, India.<br />
AICRIP {All India Coordinated <strong>Rice</strong> Improvement Project) 1971, Ann. Rep. Vols. I, III, ICAR,<br />
New Delhi, India.<br />
Akai S., Ogura, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sato, T. 1960. Annals Phytopath. Soc. Jpn. 25:125-130.<br />
AICRIP (All India Coordinated <strong>Rice</strong> Improvement Project 1975, Annual Report. Vols I <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> III,<br />
ICAR, New Delhi, India.<br />
Anj<strong>an</strong>eyulu, A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> John, V.T. 1972. Phytopath. 62; 1116-1119.<br />
Angeles, E.R., Khush, G.G. S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Heinrichs. E. A. 1986. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics, IRRI, Los Baños,<br />
Philippines, pp 537-549.<br />
Anj<strong>an</strong>eyulu, A., Shukla V.D., Rao, G.M, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh, S.K. 1981. Ini. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newslett. 6(1): 12-<br />
13,<br />
Angeles, E.R., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Heinrichs, E.A, 1981. Crop Sei. 6:551-554.<br />
Anon, 1995. R.ice Genet. Newslett. 12:9-154.<br />
Athwal, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pathak, M.D. 1972. In. <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding IRRl, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines<br />
pp. 375-386,<br />
Athwal, D.S., Pathak, M.D., Bad<strong>an</strong>gco, E.H, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pura, C.D. 1971, Crop Sei. 11:747-750.<br />
Atkins, J.G. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Johnston, T.H. 1965. Phytopatk. 55:993-995.<br />
Aveshi, G.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1984. Crop Prot. 3:41-52.<br />
Balal, M.S., Selim, A.K., Hassavien, S.H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Maximoos, M. A. 1977. Egypti<strong>an</strong> }. Gen. Cytol 6;<br />
332-341.<br />
Bonm<strong>an</strong>, J.M., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nelson, R.J. 1992, Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 30:507-528.<br />
Bonm<strong>an</strong>, J.M., Estrada, B.A., Kim, C.K., Ra, B.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Lee, E.J. 1991. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Disease 75:468-466.<br />
Brar, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1991. In: H<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>book of Pl<strong>an</strong>t Cell Culture, 4, McMill<strong>an</strong> Publ. Co., New<br />
York, USA pp. 221-263.<br />
Buddenhagen, I.W. 1983. In: Durable Resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Crops. Plenum Press, New York, USA. pp.<br />
401-428.<br />
Buddenhagen, I.W. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reddy, A.P.K, 1972, In: <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding, IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines,<br />
pp. 289-295.<br />
Catling, H.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Islam, Z. 1981. Proc. Deepwater <strong>Rice</strong> Workshop, B<strong>an</strong>gkok, Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, IRRI,<br />
Philippines.<br />
Ch<strong>an</strong>g, T.T. 1962. IRC Newslett. 11 (2): 1-7.<br />
Ch<strong>an</strong>g, T.T., W<strong>an</strong>g, M.K., Lin, K.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Geng, C.P. 1965. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Blast Disease, The Johns<br />
Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Maryl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, USA. pp. 371-377.<br />
Chaudhary, B.P., Srivastava, P.S., Shrivastava, M.N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1986. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics<br />
IRRI, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, pp. 523-528.<br />
Chaudhary, R.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nayak, P.R. 1987. In; Adv<strong>an</strong>ces in <strong>Rice</strong> Pathology, TNAU-ICAR, New<br />
Delhi, India pp. 1-35.<br />
Chaudhary, R.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1990. Insect Sei. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Applic. 11:659-669.<br />
Chaudhary, R.C., Heinrichs, E.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1981. /«f. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newslett. 6:7-8.<br />
Chaudhary, R.C., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Heinrichs, E.A. 1984. Insect Set. Applic. 5(6): 447-463.<br />
Chen, L.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g, W.L. 1971. /. Taiw<strong>an</strong> Agrie. Res. 20:57-60.<br />
CIAT (Centro Internactional de Agricultura Tropical) 1991. Cali, Colombia, pp. 51^6.<br />
Correa-Victoria, F.J., Zeigler, R.S., Tohme, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Levy, M. 1992. Proc. Symp. Durability<br />
Disease Resist<strong>an</strong>ce. lAC, Wageningen, Netherl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s.
Ram C. Chaudhary 213<br />
Crill, P„ Ham, Y,S, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Beachell, H.M. 1981, Kore<strong>an</strong> J. Breeding 13(2): 106-114.<br />
Devadath, S. 1983. Current Sei. 52:27-28.<br />
Dye, D.W,, Bradbung, J.F., Goto, M., Hayward, A.C., Lelbiatt, R.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shroth, M. N. 1980.<br />
Rev. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Pathol. 59:153-169.<br />
Ezuka, A, 1979, Proc. <strong>Rice</strong> Blast Workshop, IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 27-48,<br />
Bzuka, A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Harino, K. 1974. Bull Tokai-Kinki Natl. Agrk. Exp. Stn. 27:19-31.<br />
Flint, P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Magor, J.I. 1982. ODA Mise, Rep. No. 58, Centre for Overseas Pest Research,<br />
London.<br />
Fujimaki, H., Kiyosawa, ,S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yokoo, M, 1975. Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Jap<strong>an</strong> 41:176-184.<br />
G<strong>an</strong>gopadhyaya, S, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong>, S.Y. 1987. Breeding for Disease Resist<strong>an</strong>ce in <strong>Rice</strong>.<br />
Oxford & IBH Publ, New Delhi, India 340 pp.<br />
Gh<strong>an</strong>i, M.U. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1988. /. Genet. 67:151-159.<br />
Goita, M. 1985. Dies. Abs. Int. B. 46(5): 1808B.<br />
Goto, 1.1970. Ann. Phytopath. Soc., Jap<strong>an</strong> 36:304-312.<br />
Goto, 1.1976. Ann. Phytopath. Soc., Jap<strong>an</strong> 42:239-244,<br />
Goto, 1.1978. Ann. Phytopath. Soc., Jap<strong>an</strong> 44:447-455,<br />
Goto, 1.1979. Ann. Phytopaih. Soc., Jap<strong>an</strong> 45:252-255.<br />
Goto, 1.1988. Ann. Phytopath. Soc., Jap<strong>an</strong> 54:460-465.<br />
Goto, I,, Jaw, Y.L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Baluch, A.A. 1981. Ann. Phytopath. Soc., Jap<strong>an</strong> 47:252-255.<br />
Harl<strong>an</strong>, J.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> De Wet, J, M.J. 1971. Taxon 20:509-517.<br />
Hashioka, Y. 1950. Taiw<strong>an</strong> Agrie. Agio. Res. Inst. Tech. Bull. 8; 237.<br />
Hashloka, Y. 1951. Ann. Phytopatk. Soc. Jap<strong>an</strong>, 15:98-99<br />
Hern<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ez, J.E. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1981. Oryza 18(1): 45-50.<br />
Hibino, H., Tinongco, E.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cabunag<strong>an</strong>, R.C. 1983. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newslett. 8(4); 12-13.<br />
Hsieh, S.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g, S.C. 1977. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Prot. Bull. Taiw<strong>an</strong>, 19(1): 275-286.<br />
Ikeda, R. 1985. Bull. Natl. Agrie. Res. Cent. 3:1-54.<br />
Ikeda, R, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> K<strong>an</strong>eda, C. 1981, Jap. J. Breed. 31; 279-285.<br />
Ikeda, R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> K<strong>an</strong>eda, C. 1982. Jap. J. Breed. 32:177-185.<br />
Ikeda, R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> K<strong>an</strong>eda, C. 1983. Jap. J. Breed, 33:40-44.<br />
Imbe, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Matsumoto, S. 1985. Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce of rice varieties to blast fungus<br />
strains virulent of the variety "Reiho". Jp«, J. Breed. 35:332-359 (In Jap<strong>an</strong>ese with English<br />
Summary).<br />
INGER 1995. Proc, Advisory Committee Meeting, IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, 345 pp.<br />
Inukai,T., Nelson, R.J., Mackill, D.J., Bonmañ, J.H., Takamar, I., <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kinoshita,T. 1996. Theor.<br />
Appl. Genet. 93:560-567.<br />
Inukai, T., Nelson, R.J., Zeigler, R.S., Sarkarung, S., Mackill, D.J., Bonm<strong>an</strong>, J.M., Takamar, I,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kinoshota, T. 1994. 84:1278-1283.<br />
IRRI (International <strong>Rice</strong> Research institute) 1967. Ann. Rep. 1966. IRRI, Los Baños, Laguna,<br />
Philippines, 302 pp.<br />
IRRI 1969. Ann. Rep. 1970. IRRI, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, 402 pp.<br />
IRRI 1971. Ann. Rep. 1970. IRRI, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, 266 pp.<br />
IRRI 1972. Ann. Rep. 1971 IRRI, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, 265 pp.<br />
IRRI 1973. Ann. Rep. 1972, IRRI, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, 246 pp.<br />
IRRI 1974. Ann. Rep. 1973, IRRI, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, 266 pp.<br />
ÍRRI1975. Ann. Rep. 1974, IRRI, Los Bafios, Laguna, Philippines, 384. pp.<br />
IRRI 1976. Ann. Rep. 1975. IRRI, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, 479 pp.<br />
IRRI 1983. Ann. Rep. 1982. IRRI, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.<br />
IRRI 1984. Ann. Rep. 1983. IRRI, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.
214 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
IIHH'<br />
Ishii, T., Brar, D.S, Multam, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khushy G,S. 1994. Molecular tagging of genes for brown<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>thopper resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> earliness introgressed fvomOryza australiensis into cultivated<br />
rice, O. Sativa. Genome 37: 217-221.<br />
Ito, R. 1965. In: The <strong>Rice</strong> Blast Disease. The John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Maryl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, USA pp,<br />
361-^70.<br />
Iwata, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Omura, T, 1971. }ap. f. Breed. 21:16-17.<br />
Jayaraj, D, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Murty, V.V.S. 1983. Froc. 15th Int. Cong. Genet. 1983. AbstractNo. 1309, p. 724.<br />
Jena, K.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1990. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 737-745.<br />
Jensen, N.F. 1970; Crop Sci. 10:629-635. .<br />
Jepson, W.F. 1954. Commonwealth Inst, of Entomology, London.<br />
Johnson, R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bonm<strong>an</strong>, N.M. 1993. In: New Frontiers in <strong>Rice</strong> Research, DRR, Hyderabad,<br />
India pp. 206-212.<br />
Kabir, M.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1988. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Breed. 100:54-58.<br />
Kalode, M.B., Shastry, M.V.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pophaly D.J. 1976. J. Biol. Scii 19:62-65.<br />
K<strong>an</strong>eda, C. 1980. Gamma Field Symp. 27: 71-89.<br />
K<strong>an</strong>naiy<strong>an</strong>, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Prasad, N.N. 1978. ÍMíer, <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newslett. 2(1): 6.<br />
Katiyar, S.K., T<strong>an</strong>. Y,, Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Y., Hu<strong>an</strong>g, B., Xu, Y,, Zhao, L., Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N,, Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Bennett. 1995. Molecular tagging of gall midge resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes in rice. In: Fragile Lives in<br />
Fragile Ecosystems. IRRI Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 935-948.<br />
Kaur, S., Kaur, P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong>, S.Y. 1984. Indi<strong>an</strong> Phytopath. 37:100.<br />
Kh<strong>an</strong>, Z.R., Litsinger, J.A., Barrion, A.T., Vill<strong>an</strong>ueva, F.F.D., Fern<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ez, N.J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Taylo, L.D.<br />
1991. World Bibliography of <strong>Rice</strong> Stem Borers. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines.<br />
Khush, G.S. 1977a. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 28:296-308.<br />
Khush, G,S, 1977b. Adv. Agron. 29: 265-341.<br />
Khush, G.S. 1989. In; Progress in Irrigated <strong>Rice</strong> Research IRRI, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines,<br />
pp. 79-82.<br />
Khush, G.S. 1998. Proc. 3rd Asi<strong>an</strong> Crop Science Conf. Taichung, Taiw<strong>an</strong> roc. Abstract, p. 28.<br />
Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Brar, D.S. 1991. Adi?. Agron. 45:223-274.<br />
Khush, G.S., Rizaul Karim, A.N.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Angeles, E.R. 1985. /. Genet. 64:121-125.<br />
Khush, G.S., Brar, D.S., Zapata, F.J., Nelson, R., McCouch,S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bottrell, G. 1994. In; Toward<br />
Enh<strong>an</strong>ced <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sustainable Agricultural Productivity in 2000 s, Vol. II. Taichung District Agrie.<br />
Imp. Stn., Taiw<strong>an</strong> roc, pp. 387-414.<br />
Kiyosawa, S. 1967. Genetic studies on host-pathogen relationship in rice blast disease, Proc.<br />
Symp. <strong>Rice</strong> diseases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their control by governing resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other<br />
measures, Tokyo, pp. 137-153.<br />
Kiyosawa, S. 1968. Jap. J. Breed, 18; 193-205,<br />
Kiyosawa, S. 1969. Jap, J. Breed. 19; 121-128.<br />
Kiyosawa, S. 1970. Bull, Natl. Inst. Agrie. Sci. D 21:73-105.<br />
Kiyosawa, S. 1972a. Bull. Natl. l«sf. Agrie. Sci. D 23:69-96.<br />
Kiyosawa, S. 1972b. Jap. J. Breed. 12:140-146.<br />
Kiyosawa, S. 1974a. Agrie. Hortic, 49: 445-446.<br />
Kiyosawa, S. 1974b. Jap. J. Breed. 24:117-124.<br />
Kiyosawa, S. 1974c. Mise. Publ. Natl. Inst. Agri. Sci. 1; 1-58.<br />
kiyosawa, S. 1976. Oryza 13:1-32.<br />
Kiyosawa, S. 1978. Jap. J. Breed. 28: 287-296.<br />
Kiyosawa, S. 1981. Oryza, 18; 196-203.<br />
Kiyosawa, S. 1983. Agrie. Hortic. 10:1432-1439.<br />
Kiyosawa, S, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Murty, V.V.S. 1969. Jap, J, Breed. 22; 1269-276<br />
Kiyosawa, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yokoo, M. 1970. Jap. J. Breed, 20:181-186.<br />
Kiyosawa, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yabuki, S. 1976. Agrie. Horfic. 51:571-572.
Ram C. Chaudhary 215<br />
Kiyosawa, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cho, C.1.1980. ]ap. ]. Breed. 30:73-82.<br />
Kiyosawa, S., Orimoto, Y., Kun, He. Yung, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ling, Z.Z. 1983. Oryza 20:216-222.<br />
Koshiary, M.A., P<strong>an</strong>, C.I., Hak, G.E., Zaid, I.S.A., Azizi, A., Hindi, C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Masoud, M. 1957.<br />
IRC Newslett. 6: 23-25.<br />
Lakshminaray<strong>an</strong>a, A, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S, 1977. Crop Sci. 17; 96-100.<br />
Lee, P.N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rush, M.C. 1983. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Disease 67:829-832.<br />
Li, M.P., Ni, P.C., Chen, Y.G.G., <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shen J.H. 1983. Acta Agronomica Sínica 9:173-179.<br />
Librojo, V., Kauffm<strong>an</strong>, H.E. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G,S. 1976. SABRAO /. 8; 105-110.<br />
Ling, K.C. 1972. <strong>Rice</strong> Virus Diseflses, IRRI Los Baños, Philippines, 134 pp.<br />
Ling, K.C., John, V.T., Rao, P.S., Anj<strong>an</strong>eyulu, A., Miah, M.S.A., Ghosh, A., Koesn<strong>an</strong>g, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Flores, Z.M. 1981. iizt. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newsíeíí. 6(1): 12<br />
Loz<strong>an</strong>o, J.C. 1977. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Disease Rep. 61: 644-648.<br />
MacKenzie, D.R. 1979. In: Proc. <strong>Rice</strong> Blast Workshop. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines pp. 199-<br />
216.<br />
Mackill, D.J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bonm<strong>an</strong>, J.M. 1992, Phytopath. 82: 746-749.<br />
Martinez, C.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1974. Crop Sci. 14:264-267.<br />
Me. Couch, S.R. 1990. Construction <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> application of a molecular linkage map of rice based<br />
on restriction fragement length polymorphism (RFLP). Ph. D. Thesis, Cornell University,<br />
Ithaca, NY, USA.<br />
Me. Couch, S.R., Abenes, M.L., Angeles, E.R., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D. 1991. Molecular<br />
tagging of a recessive gene Xa-5, for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to bacterial blight of rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet.<br />
Newslett. 8:143-145.<br />
Mevii, T.W. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vera Cruz, C.M. 1977. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newslett. 2(3): 8,<br />
Mew, T.W. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vera Cruz, C.M. 1979. Phytcfpath. 69:152-155.<br />
Mew, T.W. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1981. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Pathogenic Bacteria Cali, Colombia,<br />
pp. 504-510.<br />
Mew, T.W., Vera Cruz, C.M., Reyes, R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zaragoza, B.Z. 1971. IRRI Research Paper Series<br />
No. 39,8 pp,<br />
Min, S., Wu, M., Lu, Z. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tsai, G. 1981, The inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of economic traits in early Hsein<br />
rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its role in high yield <strong>breeding</strong> Scientia Agriculturea Sínica 2:31-37 (in Chinese),<br />
Misra, A.P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chatterjee, A.K. 1963. Indi<strong>an</strong> Phytopath. 16:275-281.<br />
Misra, R.K., Mathur, S.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chaudhary, R.C. 1976. In: Proc. Symp. Increasing <strong>Rice</strong> Yield in<br />
Kharif. CRRI, Cuttack, India, pp. 95-113.<br />
Mizukami, T. 1966. Jap<strong>an</strong> Agrie. Res. Qtly. 1:6-11.<br />
Mizuta, H. 1956, Associated Pl<strong>an</strong>t Protection. Kyushu, Jap<strong>an</strong>, pp, 100-102.<br />
Moh<strong>an</strong>, M., Nair, S., Bentur, J.S., Rao, U.P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bennett, J. 1994. RFLP <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> RAPD mapping of<br />
rice GM2 gene that confuse resist<strong>an</strong>ce to Biotype 10 gall midge (Orseolia Oryzae) Theor.<br />
Appl. Genet. 87: 782-788.<br />
Moh<strong>an</strong>ty, C.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G<strong>an</strong>gopadhyay, S. 1982. Ann. Phytopath. Soc. jap<strong>an</strong> 48:5.<br />
Moh<strong>an</strong>ty, C.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G<strong>an</strong>gopadhyay, S. 1985, Indi<strong>an</strong> Phytopath. 36:54-59.<br />
Mult<strong>an</strong>i, D.S., Jena, K.K., Brar, D.S., detos Reyes, B.G., Angeles, E.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G. S. 1994.<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:102-109.<br />
Murty, V.V.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G,S. 1972. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding, IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 301-<br />
305<br />
Nagai, I, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hara, S. 1930. Jap. J. Bot 5:41.<br />
Nagai, K., Fujikami, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yoku,M. 1973./flp«fi Agrk. Res. Qtly. 7:63-70.<br />
Nagvi, N.I. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chattoo, B.B. 1996. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Ill; 570-576.<br />
Nawaz, M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kausar, A.J. 1962. Biologia Lahore 8:35-48.<br />
Nelson, R.R. 1978. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 16; 359-378.
216 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Nemoto, H., Ikeda, R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> K<strong>an</strong>eda, C. 1989. }ap. J. Breeding 39:23-28.<br />
Ogawa, T., Morinaka, T., Fuji, K, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kumura, T. 197S,Ann. Phi/lppath. Soc. Jap<strong>an</strong> 44; 137-141.<br />
Olufowote, J.O., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kauffm<strong>an</strong>, H.E. 1977.■ Phytopath, 67: 772-775.<br />
Ou, S.H. 1979. In: Proc, <strong>Rice</strong> Blast Workshop. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 81-137.<br />
Ou, S.H. 1985. <strong>Rice</strong> Diseases (2nd ed.). Commonwealth Mycological Inst., Kew, Surrey, UK.<br />
380 pp.<br />
Ou, S.H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nuque, P.L. 1963. IRC Klewslett. 12(4): 30-35.<br />
Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong>, S.Y. 1965. Cwrrertí Sei. 34:307-308.<br />
Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong>, S.Y. 1973. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 11:11-26.<br />
Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong>, S.Y. 1974, Final Tech. Rep. US-PL-480 Proj. CRRI, Cuttack, India.<br />
Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong>, S.Y,, G<strong>an</strong>guly, D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ch<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>w<strong>an</strong>i, G.H. 1966. Indi<strong>an</strong> Phytopath, 31:72-75.<br />
P<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1995. Host Pl<strong>an</strong>t Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to Insects. CABI-IRRI, Wallingford, UK,<br />
431 pp.<br />
Pathak, M.D. 1964. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Comm. Newslett. 13; 15-21.<br />
Pathak, M.D. 1968. Ann, Rev. Ent. 13:257-294.<br />
Pathak, M.D. 1970. In: Concept of Pest M<strong>an</strong>agement N.C. State Univ, Raleigh, pp. 138-157.<br />
Pathak, M.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kh<strong>an</strong>, Z.R. 1994. Insect Pests of <strong>Rice</strong>. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, ICIPE,<br />
Kenya, 89 pp.<br />
Pathak, M.D., Ch<strong>an</strong>g, C.H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fortuno, N.E, 1969. Nature 223:502-505.<br />
Pathak, M.D., Andres, F., Galacgac, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ramos, R. 1971. ÍRRÍ Tech. Bidl. 11: 69 pp.<br />
Petpisit, V., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kauffm<strong>an</strong>, H.E, 1977. Crop Sei, 17:551-554,<br />
Prakasa Rao, P.S. 1984. Cecidology Internationale 6 :9-17.<br />
Premlatha Dath, A. 1985. Sheath Blight of <strong>Rice</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its M<strong>an</strong>agement, Assoc. Publ. Co., New<br />
Delhi, 129 pp.<br />
Premlatha Dath, A. 1990. Sheath Blight Disease of <strong>Rice</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its M<strong>an</strong>agement. Assoc. Publ. Co.<br />
New Delhi, India, \29 pp.<br />
R<strong>an</strong>i, N.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Saty<strong>an</strong>aray<strong>an</strong>a, K, 1982. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Neioslett. 7(5): 7<br />
Rao, P.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kauffm<strong>an</strong>, H.E. 1977. Phytopath. 55: 281-284.<br />
Rath, G.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong>, S.Y. 1972. Proc. Indi<strong>an</strong> Acad. Set. 76:106.<br />
Rath, G.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Padm<strong>an</strong>abh<strong>an</strong>, S.Y. 1973. //Riso 22(2): 123-129.<br />
Reddy, A. P.K., Miah, S.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mew, T.W. 1986. In: Progress in Rainfed Lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong>, IRRI, Los<br />
Baños, Philippines, 253-262 pp.<br />
Reitsma, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Schure, P.S.J. 1950. Contrih. Gen. Agrie. Res. Stn. Bogor 117:1-17.<br />
Reys, R.C., Vera Cru2;, C.M., Aballa, T.C., Baraoid<strong>an</strong>, M.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mew, T.M. 1982. In: Revised<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Production M<strong>an</strong>ual, IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines.<br />
Rezul, Karim, A.N.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pathak, M.D, 1982. Genetic control of iron deficiency chlorosis<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce in rice, Rt. N 6:115-116.<br />
Rivera C.T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ou, S.H. 1967. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Disease Rep. 51; 877-^881.<br />
Rivera, C.T., Ou, S.H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lida, T.T. 1966. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Disease Rep. 50:453-456.<br />
Robinson, R.A. 1973. Rev. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Pathol. 52:483-501.<br />
Ronald, P.C., Alb<strong>an</strong>o, B., Tabien, R:, Abenes, L., Wu, K., Me. Couch, S.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D.<br />
1992. Genetic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> physical <strong>an</strong>alysis of the rice bacterial leaf blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce locus Xfl-22,<br />
Mol. Gen. Genet. 236:113-120.<br />
Roy, J.K., Israel, P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P<strong>an</strong>war, M.S. 1971. Oryza 8:129-134.<br />
Ru<strong>an</strong>gsook, B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1987. Crop Protec. 6; 244-249.<br />
Sahu, V.N., Mishra, R., Chaudhary, B.P., Srivastava, P.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Srivastava, M.N. 1985.<br />
Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to gall midge in rice REN 7:118-121.<br />
Saini, R.S., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Heinrichs, E.A. 1982. Crop Protect. 1 :289-297.<br />
Sastry, M.V.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Prakasa Rao, P.S. 1973. Curr. Sei. 42: 652-653.
Ram C, Chaudhary 217<br />
Sastry, M.V.S., Prasada Rao, U., Kalode, M.B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sain M. 1984. Indi<strong>an</strong> J. Genet. 44:325-328.<br />
Saty<strong>an</strong>aray<strong>an</strong>aiah, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reddi, M.V. 1972,>4iid/ini Agrie. J. 19; 1-8.<br />
Seetharam<strong>an</strong>, R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shobha R<strong>an</strong>i, N. 1979. Dir. Extn., Ministry of Agrie. Govt, of India 79 pp.<br />
Shastry, S.V.S., Freem<strong>an</strong>, W.H., Seshu, D.V., Israel, P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Roy, J.K. 1972. In; <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding,<br />
IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 353-365.<br />
Sidhu, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1978. Theor. Appl. Genet. 33:199-203.<br />
Sidhu, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1979. Euphytica 28:233-237.<br />
Sidhu, G.S., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Madr<strong>an</strong>o F.G. 1979. Euphytica 28:227-232.<br />
Singh, L. 1993. In: Host Pl<strong>an</strong>t ^sist<strong>an</strong>ce to Insects. G.S.- Dhaliwal <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> V. K. Dilawari (eds.).<br />
Kaly<strong>an</strong>i Publ., New Delhi, pp. 31-78.<br />
Singh, R.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pavgi, M.S. 1969. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Disease Rep. 53:444-445,<br />
Singh, R.J., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mew, T.W. 1983. Crop Sd. 23:558-560.<br />
Siwi, B.H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1977, Crop Sci. 29:17-20.<br />
Skaguchi, S., Suwa, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Murata, N. 1968. Bh//. N«í/. Jnsi. Agrie. Sci. Jap<strong>an</strong> 16:1-18.<br />
Swaminath<strong>an</strong>, M.B. 1979. In: Proc. V Mel. Wheat Genetics Symp. New Delhi, India, 1978.<br />
Srivastava, M.N., Kumar, A., Sri vasta va, S.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sahu, R.K. 1994. A new gene for gall midge<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newslett. 10:79-80.<br />
Tagami, Y, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mizukami, T. 1962. Spec. Rep. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Disease <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Insect Pests Forecasting Service<br />
10,112 pp. Tokyo, Jap<strong>an</strong>.<br />
Takahashi, Y. 1965. In: The <strong>Rice</strong> Blast Disease. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Maryl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, USA<br />
303 pp.<br />
T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D, 1983. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Mol. Biol. Rep, 1; 3-^.<br />
Tomar, J.B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tomar, S.D. 1987. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Breed. 98:47-52.<br />
Toriyama, K. 1975. In: Horizontal I^sist<strong>an</strong>ce to the Blast Disease of <strong>Rice</strong>. CIAT, Cali, Colombia,<br />
pp. 65-100.<br />
Uchimiya, H., H<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Brar, D.S. 1989, J, Biotech. 12:1-20.<br />
Uchimiya, H., Toki, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Brar, D.S. 1991. Gamma Field Symp. No. 30, NIAR Ibaraki, Jap<strong>an</strong>,<br />
pp, 151-163.<br />
Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. (ed.) 1994. Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong> Technology: New Developments <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Future Prospects IRRI,<br />
Los Baños, Philippines, 296 pp.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, G.L., Mackill, D.J., Bonm<strong>an</strong>, J.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D. 1994. Genetics 136; 1421-1434.<br />
Wu, C.F. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1985. Crop Sci. 11; 505-509.<br />
Wu, S.Z., Hsu, S.M., Chen, F.K., Choi, L.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Liu, J.M. 1981. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newsletts, 6(5): 6.<br />
Yamada, T. 1984. Jap. J. Breed. 34; 181-190.<br />
Yamazaki, Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kiyosawa, S. 1966, Studies on inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of rice varieties to blast I.<br />
Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of Jap<strong>an</strong>ese varieties is to several strains of the fungus. Bull. Natl. Ins. Agr. Sci.<br />
D. 14; 36-39 (In Jap<strong>an</strong>ese).<br />
Yamazaki, Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kosaka, T. (eds.) 1980. Blast Disease <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Breeding for Resist<strong>an</strong>t Varieties of<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>. Tokyo, Hukyu-Sha 340 pp.<br />
Yokoo, M., <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kiyosawa, S, 1970. Jap. J. Breed. 20:129-132.<br />
Yokoo, M., <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kikuchi, F. 1977. Jap, J. Breed. 27:123-130.<br />
Yoshimura, A., Mew, T.M., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Omura. T. 1983. Phytopath. 73:1409-1412.<br />
Yoshimura, S., Yoshimura, A., Saito, A,, Kishimoto, N., Kawase, M., Y<strong>an</strong>o, M., Nakagahra,<br />
M., Ogawa, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Iwata, N. 1992. RFLP <strong>an</strong>alysis of introgressed chromosomal segments<br />
in three near isogenic lines of rice bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes Xa-1, Xd-3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xa~4.<br />
Jap. f. Genet. 67:29-37.<br />
Yu<strong>an</strong>, L.P. 1993. In: New Frontiers in <strong>Rice</strong> Research. DRR, Hyderabad, India, pp. 86-90.<br />
Yu, Z.H., Mackill, D.J., Bonm<strong>an</strong>n, J.M., T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D. 1991. Tagging genes for blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
in rice via linkage to RFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:471-476.
10<br />
Breeding for Adverse Soil<br />
Problems in <strong>Rice</strong><br />
B.N. Singh*<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Since the release of IR 8 in 1966, world rice area increased by 2 2 million<br />
ha, from 126 Mha to 148 Mha in 1992. The paddy production during the<br />
same period doubled from 261 million tons to 528 Mt. This was mainly<br />
due to adoption of the improved high-yielding varieties with toler<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
to biophysical stresses, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> better input-responsive production<br />
technology. With the growing world population, paddy production has<br />
to be increased to 810 Mt by the year 2025 (Rosegr<strong>an</strong>t et al., 1995). The<br />
increase in production should be met through <strong>an</strong> increase in<br />
productivity per unit of l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong> increase in rice area. Good rice<br />
l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s in periurb<strong>an</strong> areas are fast declining due to rapid urb<strong>an</strong>ization <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
industrialization. The increase in area to meet the dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> of rice will<br />
have to come from marginal l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> problem soil areas. Globally, 138<br />
Mha of such l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are available, of which 23 Mha are potential areas for<br />
rice cultivation (Boje-Klein, 1986). These adverse soils are widely<br />
distributed in arid, semiarid, subhumid, humid, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> temperate regions<br />
of the world. Broadly adverse soils are classified as saline, sodic, acid<br />
sulfate, calcareous, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> acid upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s. The saline soils c<strong>an</strong> either be<br />
inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> or coastal. These soils are characterized by multiple nutrient<br />
stresses. In addition to this there is a deficiency or toxicity of nutrients.<br />
Lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Breeder, WARDA Bouake, Côte d 'Ivoire
2.20 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
individual which adversely affects soil quality. The nutrient deficiencies<br />
are zinc, phosphorus, iron, sulfur <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> silica. The nutrient toxicides are<br />
aluminum, iron, boron, hydrogen sulfide, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> m<strong>an</strong>ag<strong>an</strong>ese. These<br />
problem soils c<strong>an</strong> be exploited for rice cultivation through varietal<br />
improvement <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soil amendments. No variety c<strong>an</strong> tolerate acute<br />
nutrient deficiency or toxicity, but some c<strong>an</strong> tolerate these partially<br />
better th<strong>an</strong> others. Varieties toler<strong>an</strong>t to problem soils will reduce the<br />
cost of reclamation through amendments. Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pormamperuma<br />
(1976), Ponnamperuma (1984), Chaubey <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senadhira (1994), De Datta<br />
et al (1994), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Flowers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yeo (1995) have done some reviews on this<br />
topic.<br />
SOIL STRESSES ’<br />
Inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Salinity<br />
Globally around 77 Mha of l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are affected by salinity, of which 72%<br />
have a light to moderate degree of salinity (Munns <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Richards, 1998).<br />
In these areas, the water table is high <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> underground water may be<br />
saline or normal. These soils have a pH r<strong>an</strong>ging from 7,0 to 8.3,<br />
exch<strong>an</strong>geable sodium less th<strong>an</strong> 15%, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> electrical conductivity in<br />
saturation extract (ECe) of more th<strong>an</strong> 4 mmho cm'^ at 25®C in the top 50<br />
cm. Four mmho cm”^ is the point beyond which rice yields decline<br />
appreciably as the salt content increases (Maas <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hoffm<strong>an</strong>, 1977), The<br />
salt composition is mainly of chlorides <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sulfates of Na, Ca, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mg.<br />
These soils are deficient in nitrogen, phosphorus, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> zinc. At present<br />
about 5 Mha of saline l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s are cultivated to rice. Problems of salinity<br />
are increasing due to poor drainage in c<strong>an</strong>al irrigation systems. Mapping<br />
of groundwater quality is essential for its suitability to irrigation (Gupta,<br />
1994). In Pakist<strong>an</strong>, of a total 15 Mha of irrigated l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, 11 Mha are salt<br />
affected. In Iraq, 50% of the 3.6 Mha suffer from salinity, in India-26<br />
Mha, Indonesia-15 Mha, China-7.6 Mha, Malaysia-4.8 Mha, B<strong>an</strong>gladesh-<br />
4 Mha, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in Egypt-about 1 Mha. In Australia 20%, China 15%, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Israel 13% of irrigated l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is affected by salinity (Abrol, 1986; Gleick,<br />
1993; Hu<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rozelle, 1993; Ghassemi et al, 1995; Kijne et al, 1998).<br />
Coastal Salinity<br />
Around 27 Mha of l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in the humid zone of coastal areas are inundated<br />
by sea water. Most of these l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s are under m<strong>an</strong>grove vegetation. Areas<br />
closer to the mouth of estuaries have more saline water inundation th<strong>an</strong><br />
areas farther away from the sea. There are about 2.1 Mha of coastal
B.N. Singh 221<br />
saline soils in India, which are mainly found in Gujarat, Orissa, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
West Bengal. In West Africa, 1.5 Mha of cultivable m<strong>an</strong>grove swamp are<br />
affected by salinity, of which only 0.2 Mha are under cultivation (Jones,<br />
1986). Coastal soil salinity is also increasing in the Nile delta in Egypt,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the northern Senegal Kiver delta. In m<strong>an</strong>y coastal saline areas, the<br />
soils are acidic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are potential acid sulfate soils. In the dry season, the<br />
salinity effect increases due to sea-water intrusion. Waterlogging is<br />
common in coastal saline areas in the wet season.<br />
Sodicity or Alkalinity<br />
Around 31 Mha l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in semiarid <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subhumid areas of South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Southeast Asia, Africa, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Australia have a pH r<strong>an</strong>ging from 8.3 to<br />
11.0, exch<strong>an</strong>geable sodium more th<strong>an</strong> 15%, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ECe less th<strong>an</strong> 4 mmho<br />
cm“^in the top 50 cm. Their salt composition is mainly carbonates <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
bicarbonates of sodium <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> calcium. These soils are deficient in<br />
nitrogen, phosphorus, zinc <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> iron, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> have boron toxicity. These<br />
soils do not have a high water table <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> water percolation is low. In<br />
Pakist<strong>an</strong>, 9.4 Mha <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in India, 2.5 Mha soils in the Indo-G<strong>an</strong>getic plains<br />
are affected by sodicity (Pormamperuma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> B<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>yopadhya, 1980).<br />
Calcareous Saline Sodic<br />
About 6 Mha are classified as calcareous saline sodic soils. They have<br />
high calcium carbonates (3-38%) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pH r<strong>an</strong>ging from 7.5 to 11.0.<br />
Severe zinc, iron <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> phosphorus deficiency occurs in such soils. These<br />
types of soils are common in Pakist<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> India. In northern Bihar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
eastern Uttar Pradesh in India, over 200,000 ha of calcareous saline sodic<br />
soils with up to 49% free CaCQs are found.<br />
Acid Sulfate<br />
Around 13 Mha soils in Indonesia, Vietnam, Cambodia, Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>,<br />
B<strong>an</strong>gladesh, West Africa, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Venezuela have a pH r<strong>an</strong>ging from 3.0 to<br />
4.5, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are classified as acid sulfate. Around 507o of such l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s are<br />
under cultivation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the rest are potential area for rice cultivation. In<br />
the associated m<strong>an</strong>grove, where sea-water immdation is reduced during<br />
the dry season, acid sulfate soils develop over a period of time due to<br />
sulfide or sulfuric acid deposition. These soils show iron <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> aluminum<br />
toxicity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> phosphorus deficiency.
222 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Feat Soils<br />
Peat soils cover more th<strong>an</strong> 200 Mha worldwide, of which 32 Mha are in<br />
the tropics, specifically 22 Mha in Asia, 7 Mha in Latin America, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 3<br />
Mha in Africa. In Indonesia, about 16.5 Mha peat soils occur in coastal<br />
lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, of which only 0.5 Mha is cultivated. The pH of peat soils r<strong>an</strong>ges<br />
from 3.5 to 7.5 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> org<strong>an</strong>ic matter more th<strong>an</strong> 65% by weight in a<br />
minimum depth of 50 cm (Driessen, 1978). Subst<strong>an</strong>tial areas under peat<br />
soils occur in Malaysia, Vietnam, Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, India (Kerala) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are being<br />
reclaimed for cultivation, <strong>Rice</strong> grown in peat soils (Histosols) suffers<br />
from N, P, K, Cu, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 2n, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mo deficiencies.<br />
Add Upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s<br />
In tropical humid forests (Ultisols <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Oxisols) of Latin America, West<br />
Africa, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> high rainfall areas in Meghalaya, India, upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice is grown<br />
on aerobic soils with low pH (4.0-6.5). Around 1,400 Mha of such l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s<br />
are accounted for in Latin America alone, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 300 Mha are potential<br />
areas for upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice (Sarkarung, 1986). Availability of P in these soils is<br />
reduced by reaction of soluble P with iron <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> aluminum oxides. These<br />
soils in general suffer from P, K, Al, Ca, Mg, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zn, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Si deficiencies.<br />
Phosphorus (P) Deficiency<br />
P deficiency occurs in acid upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s, calcareous soils, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> acid sulfate<br />
soils. It signifies the non availability of added or soil P to pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Around<br />
3 Mha of rainfed upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice grown in humid zones of Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 6 Mha<br />
in Latin America suffer from P deficiency. It is a problem in Ultisols,<br />
Oxisols, Andosols, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> some Vertisols.<br />
Zinc (Zn) Deficiency<br />
This is the most common nutrient deficiency of wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice after N <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
P deficiency. It occurs in soils with pH more th<strong>an</strong> 7 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> org<strong>an</strong>ic carbon<br />
more th<strong>an</strong> 3%. Zinc deficiency in rice was first reported by Nene in 1966.<br />
Subsequently more <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more paddy l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s suffering from it have been<br />
identified. In India alone, it is suspected that around 8 Mha rice is<br />
affected (Jones et al, 1982). It is common in calcareous, sodic, inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
saline, s<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>y, peat, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> regardless of pH in continuously wet soils. Zinc<br />
deficiency is becoming a problem in acid upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soils under reduced<br />
fallow period in southeastern Nigeria (Singh et al, 1997). In the Ivory<br />
Coast, it has also been observed in upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice of the moist sav<strong>an</strong>na zone<br />
(Sahrawat et al, 1993).
B.N. Singh 223<br />
Iron (Fe) Deficiency<br />
Upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice grown on acid, alluvial calcareous, alkaline <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> s<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>y soils<br />
under <strong>an</strong>aerobic conditions suffers from iron deficiency. Iron is<br />
import<strong>an</strong>t for chlorophyll biosynthesis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> linked with a number of<br />
enzyme systems in the pl<strong>an</strong>t. In India, it has been reported from Bihar,<br />
West Bengal, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vertisols of central <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> western Maharastra (T<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>on<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shinde, 1993). Crops such as soybe<strong>an</strong>, chickpea, pe<strong>an</strong>ut, sugarc<strong>an</strong>e,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lentil also suffer from iron chlorosis.<br />
Silicon (Si) Deficiency<br />
Soils such as Oxisols, Ultisols, Histosols, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> s<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>y Entisois are low in<br />
available silica. <strong>Rice</strong> grown in acid upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soils of humid zones in Africa<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> highly weathered upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soils in the sav<strong>an</strong>na zone of Latin America<br />
shows silicon deficiency. Use of basic slag as a source of Si to lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
rice is common in Jap<strong>an</strong>, Korea, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Taiw<strong>an</strong> for soils containing<br />
relatively low levels of extractable Si.<br />
Sulfur (S) Deficiency<br />
Lack of org<strong>an</strong>ic sulfur causes stunted growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yellowing of leaves. In<br />
alkaline soils of Pakist<strong>an</strong>, soils having 33 ppm sulfur have shown<br />
response to increased grain yield through sulfur application (Karim <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Majlish, 1958). Most of the wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soils in India have started showing S<br />
deficiency due to declining use of single superphosphate <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
ammonium sulfate, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the sole application of urea as <strong>an</strong> inorg<strong>an</strong>ic<br />
fertilizer. S deficiency not only affects pl<strong>an</strong>t yield, but also protein<br />
quality, by reducing s3mthesis of S-containing amino acids.<br />
Iron (Fe) Toxicity<br />
This is one of the major soil constraints of acid lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soils, inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
valley swamps, coastal swamps, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> irrigated lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s in Ultisols ¡<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Oxisols; ^In the humid forest <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> moist sav<strong>an</strong>na zone of Africa, interflow<br />
of ferrous ions occurs from upper slopes (Moorm<strong>an</strong>n <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> v<strong>an</strong> Breem<strong>an</strong>,<br />
1978). More th<strong>an</strong> 50% lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice in Sierra Leone, Liberia, Guinea,<br />
Nigeria, The Ivory Coast, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senegal is affected by iron toxicity. It also<br />
occurs in Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka, Vietnam, Malaysia, India (Kerala, Orissa), Indonesia<br />
(Kalim<strong>an</strong>t<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sumatra), the Philippines, Brazil, Colombia, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Madagascar (Sahrawat <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh, 1995). <strong>Rice</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>ts show symptoms of<br />
broirzing due to high dissolved iron, Fe^'*' in soil solution around the
224 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
rooting zone {Ponnamperuma et al, 1995). Young acid sulfate soils in<br />
coastal areas also show symptorns of iron toxicity (Ottow et al, 1991).<br />
Aluminum (Al) Toxicity<br />
This is a problem in rice grown in acid upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> acid sulfate soils^<br />
with pH 5.0 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> below. In such soils it is also related low P availability.<br />
In acid upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s, if Al Concentration in soil solution is more th<strong>an</strong> 1 to 2<br />
ppm, it shows Al toxicity. The Al toxicity inhibits root growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
restricts the nutrient <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> water uptake <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leads to poor growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
yield.<br />
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2 S) Toxicity<br />
H 2S toxicity occurs in young acid sulfate soils due to the reduction of<br />
sulfates in submerged soils.<br />
Boron (B) Toxicity<br />
In coastal soils <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> volc<strong>an</strong>ic areas, B toxicity is hazardous to crop<br />
production. Soils irrigated with geothermal water or inundated by<br />
brackish water have shown B toxicity.<br />
Nutrient Imbal<strong>an</strong>ces<br />
Nutrient stresses are caused by synergistic or <strong>an</strong>tagonistic uptake of one<br />
<strong>an</strong>other. Deficiency or toxicity of one element may be induced by surplus<br />
or toxicity of others. In iron toxic soils with a low leVel of P <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> K, the<br />
toxicity symptoms are severe at low iron levels of 30 ppm. The ophmum<br />
ratios for rice have been identified as: P /Z n (20-60), P /F e (10-20), K /<br />
Na, Ca/M g (1.0-1.5), Fe/Z n (5-7), Pe/M n (1.5-2.5). More studies are<br />
needed regarding these nutrient imbal<strong>an</strong>ces (De Datta et al, 1994).<br />
1': ' j<br />
VARIETAL IMPROVEMENT TO SOIL STRESSES<br />
J<strong>Rice</strong> is <strong>an</strong> ideal crop for reclamation of m<strong>an</strong>y problem soils. Selection of<br />
rice cultivars with a higher level of toler<strong>an</strong>ce to soil stresses has been <strong>an</strong><br />
ongoing <strong>research</strong> activity in m<strong>an</strong>y national <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> international programs.<br />
M<strong>an</strong>y superior cultivars were selected from the l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> races. International<br />
agricultural <strong>research</strong> centers such as IRRI, CIAT, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> WARDA have also<br />
been engaged in the developments of improved cultivars with high<br />
yield potential.
B.N. Singh 225<br />
The production potential of rice cultivars in problem soils c<strong>an</strong> be<br />
enh<strong>an</strong>ced through genetic m<strong>an</strong>ipulations- However^ there is need for a<br />
better underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing of the constraints, their soil chemistry, nutrient<br />
interactions development of reliable appropriate laboratory <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> field<br />
screening methodologies, identification of hot spot locations <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their<br />
characterization, studies on the physiological mech<strong>an</strong>ism of toler<strong>an</strong>ce;<br />
germplasm evaluation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>breeding</strong> for toler<strong>an</strong>ce, <strong>genetics</strong> of toler<strong>an</strong>ce,<br />
pre<strong>breeding</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> biotechnology; strengthening seed production, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
technology dissemination.<br />
Diagnosis of Constraints<br />
To develop appropriate varieties for problem soils, it is essential to<br />
properly underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> characterize the soil constraint. Site<br />
characterization is essential for better technology targeting. As the biotic<br />
constraints vary from one location to <strong>an</strong>other, it is relev<strong>an</strong>t to develop<br />
location-specific varieties. Sometimes toler<strong>an</strong>ce to one stress is related to<br />
other stresses. So it is better to evaluate for one stress initially <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other<br />
stresses later. Salinity toler<strong>an</strong>t lines are also toler<strong>an</strong>t to alkalinity, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zn deficiency. Fe toxicity toler<strong>an</strong>t lines are toler<strong>an</strong>t to Zn deficiency.<br />
In rainfed upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s, toler<strong>an</strong>ce to P deficiency is closely related to<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce to A1 or Mn toxicity. Thus, toler<strong>an</strong>ce to salinity, Fe toxicity,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zn deficiencies are the crucial traits for developing stresstoler<strong>an</strong>t<br />
varieties.<br />
Nutrient Interactions<br />
It has been observed that in rice a deficiency of one nutrient causes<br />
increased uptake of nutrients of the same valence. Under saline<br />
conditions, K deficiency increased Na resulted in uptake (Yoshida <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Cast<strong>an</strong>eda, 1969). Yoshida et at (1971) showed that Zn-deficient rice had<br />
a higher Fe <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mn content th<strong>an</strong> rice that had adequate Zn. N content is<br />
also reduced in Zn-deficient rice (Sedberry et at, 1971). Iron toxicity is a<br />
complex nutrient disorder <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the deficiencies of other nutrients,<br />
especially P, K, Ca, Mg, Si, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zn, have been implicated for iron<br />
toxicity in rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts (V<strong>an</strong> Breemen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Moorm<strong>an</strong>n, 1978). A1 toxicity is<br />
related to poor availability of P <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ca to the pl<strong>an</strong>ts.<br />
Symptoms <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Screening Methodologies<br />
Screening for different soil stresses c<strong>an</strong> be carried out in the laboratory,<br />
greenhouse <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> field. Screening methodologies for certain nutrients c<strong>an</strong><br />
be developed in culture solutions <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> screening done in the greenhouse.
226 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Field screening at hot spot locations is also appropriate. But due to the<br />
highly heterogeneous nature of the soil, several replications may be<br />
needed for precision. There is a need to characterize the site for nutrients<br />
in the root zone <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> also in the soil profile up to 100 or 150 cm.<br />
Salinity toler<strong>an</strong>ce screening in the laboratory is mostly confined to<br />
the germination stage (Pearson et al, 1966; Bari et al, 1973). Yoshida et al<br />
(1976) developed the greerütouse technique for salinity screening at<br />
IRRI In this method, seeds are pregerminated on styrofoam with 100<br />
holes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nylon net bottom. They are grown in a nutrient medium at pH<br />
5.0 for 14 days. Further, they are tr<strong>an</strong>sferred to a saline medium. The<br />
salinity level of 6,800 ppm <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> EC 12 ds m"^ in solutiori is prepared by<br />
adding 1:1 mixture of sodium chloride <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> calcium chloride. Seedling<br />
survival is recorded after 2 weeks. St<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard resist<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> susceptible<br />
checks are used for comparison (IRRI, 1996). Field screening at wellcharacterized<br />
hot spot locations, or maintaining the pH <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> EC in the<br />
field by irrigating with saline water c<strong>an</strong> also be equally reliable. Asch et<br />
al (1997) in a field screening method in arid sahel at Ndiaye, Senegal<br />
maintained the sodium concentration (EC 3.5 mS cm“^) by irrigating<br />
with sodium chloride saline water.<br />
For A1 toxicity toler<strong>an</strong>ce, both culture solution <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> field screenirig<br />
techniques are available (Howeler <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cadavid, 1976; Sarkarung, 1986;<br />
Coronel et al, 1990). In the culture solution method,.SO^ppm A1 is added<br />
for the A1 toxicity screening. The relative root length, in 30. ppm A1 is<br />
compared with that in the normal nutrient medium. In" field'screening,<br />
comparison are made with reference varieties grown in?f trip plots<br />
without lime <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> with 3 t lime plof^ (Sarkarung, 1986). ^ ;<br />
Iron chlorosis is a problem of calcareous <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> s<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>y âéfhbic jsQilç. In<br />
addition to field screening, a laboratory screening method By détiinating<br />
orthophen<strong>an</strong>throline reactive in the topmost leaves is simple; àffd<br />
reliable (Singh et al, 1985, 1986).<br />
In zinc deficiency, the symptoms start appearing a week after<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>spl<strong>an</strong>ting <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in the case of acute deficiency, the leaves dry <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t dies, In mild deficiency, sometimes pl<strong>an</strong>ts recover, but mattirity is<br />
delayed by 10-20 days. In early stages, the symptoms first appeal at the ^<br />
third leaf from the top. Brown rusty spots appear toward the leaf base<br />
that coalesce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grow toward the leaf tip. The zinc deficient plots haya<br />
a brown rusty appear<strong>an</strong>ce, tillering is reduced, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> growth is retarded.<br />
IRRI (1996) has developed the St<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard Evaluation System (SES) pf;<br />
rice screening for salt <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> alkali injury, iron toxicity, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zn<br />
deficiencies. The SES is based on a scale of 1. to 9 :1 is highly .toler<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
9 highly susceptible. Pl<strong>an</strong>t growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tillering, are the two major traits<br />
scored for screening. Symptoms of P deficiency are not easily<br />
recognized. Tillering is severely reduced in P-deficiency. P-efficient
B.N. Singh 227<br />
genot3^ e s have high tillering ability at low P levels in a culture solution<br />
or in a P-deficient field. In salt injury/ the leaves roll up while in alkali<br />
injury, they are discolored. In iron toxicity, the leaves turn or<strong>an</strong>ge,<br />
or<strong>an</strong>ge-yellow, to reddish-brown or purple. Zinc deficiency symptoms<br />
m<strong>an</strong>ifest at the third leaf from the top <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the leaves turn brown.<br />
Bronzing is the typical symptom of iron toxicity, but yellow or or<strong>an</strong>ge<br />
coloration is observed in iron-toxic soils due to deficiencies in P, K, Ca,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mg induced by the high iron content (Howeler, 1973). It' is better to<br />
evaluate the lines after flowering <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> at maturity. The comparison<br />
should be made with toler<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> susceptible checks. As the soil is<br />
highly heterogeneous, the maximum score among the different<br />
replications should be taken as the criterion for reaction of a line. The<br />
comparative yield in relation to toler<strong>an</strong>t check should also be used as a<br />
criterion for selecting higher yielding genotypes. The scale for grain<br />
yield will be different th<strong>an</strong> the one for vegetative stage toler<strong>an</strong>ce. Asch ef<br />
al. (1997) classified lines with up to 40% yield reduction as toler<strong>an</strong>t, 41-<br />
50% moderately toler<strong>an</strong>t, 51-60% moderately susceptible, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> above<br />
61% highly susceptible.<br />
Hot-spot Locations<br />
Certain sites, where the deficiency or toxicity symptoms always appear,<br />
c<strong>an</strong> be used for hot-spot screening (Table 10.1). In order to validate the<br />
results from one site to other sites, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for technology targeting, it is<br />
essential to characterize, the site for different nutrients. The growing<br />
seasons also affect the m<strong>an</strong>ifestation of symptoms in the pl<strong>an</strong>ts. In<br />
salinity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> iron toxicity screening under irrigated conditions at Ndiaye,<br />
Senegal, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Korhogo Ivory Coast, higher damage scores were observed<br />
in the dry season th<strong>an</strong> in the wet season (Asch et al, 1997; Sahrawat <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Singh, 1998). So, where facilities are available, it is better to screen in the<br />
dry season th<strong>an</strong> in the wet season to select better toler<strong>an</strong>t lines.<br />
Physiological Mech<strong>an</strong>ism of Toler<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
It was earlier reported that both osmotic imbal<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong> accumulation<br />
of chloride ion () cause salt injury. Later the role of Na <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Na-<br />
K imbal<strong>an</strong>ce was reported as adversely affecting yield (Devitt et al,<br />
1980; Ponnamperuma, 1984). Studies have shown that rice is very<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>t to salinity during germination, but sensitive at the first to<br />
second leaf stage, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> at flowering. Its toler<strong>an</strong>ce increases during<br />
tillering (Pearson et al, 1966). Salinity damage is predomin<strong>an</strong>tly due to<br />
excessive Na ion uptake <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Na accumulation in the leaves. Resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
to salinity is composed of avoid<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> toler<strong>an</strong>ce. Avoid<strong>an</strong>ce c<strong>an</strong> be
228 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Table 10.1 Key sites for field screening for different problem soils<br />
Soil stress<br />
Inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> salinity<br />
Coastal salinity<br />
Alkalinity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
sodicity<br />
Iron toxicity<br />
Aluminium<br />
toxicity'<br />
Zinc deficiency<br />
Iron deficiency<br />
Acid lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Acid upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s<br />
Country <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> locations<br />
B<strong>an</strong>gladesh (Joydebpur), Cambodia (Tuk Chha, Suay Rieng),<br />
Burma (Kyaukt<strong>an</strong>), Korea (Hwasong, Kyehwa, Namy<strong>an</strong>g,<br />
Gyhewa), Ir<strong>an</strong> (Amol)<br />
B<strong>an</strong>gladesh (Satkhira), India (C<strong>an</strong>ning, -P<strong>an</strong>vel), Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka<br />
(Ambal<strong>an</strong>tota, Bentota, Kirinda), Egypt (Sakha, Seru), Sierra Leone<br />
(Rokupr), Senegal (Djibelor)<br />
India (Karnal, K<strong>an</strong>pur, Kumarg<strong>an</strong>j, Pindi), Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> (Meung),<br />
Pakist<strong>an</strong> (Pindi Bhatti<strong>an</strong>)<br />
Sierra Leone (Rokupr), Ivory Coast (Korhogo), Nigeria (Bende,<br />
Edozhigi), Liberia (Suakoko), Guinea (Killissi)<br />
Colombia (CIAT, ll<strong>an</strong>os)<br />
India (Pusa, Bihar), Philippines (IRRI)<br />
India (Pusa, Bihar)<br />
Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> (Prachinburi), Burma (Myaung Mya, Sagamya), Malaysia<br />
(Alor Setar), India (Barap<strong>an</strong>i), Vietnam (Moc Hoa, Long <strong>an</strong>)<br />
Burma (Aungb<strong>an</strong>), Colombia (Villavicencio), Indonesia (Kotabaru),<br />
Ivory Coast (M<strong>an</strong>), Nigeria (Amakama, Onne, Uyo), Philippines<br />
(Iloilo), Vietnam (Dong Mai)<br />
achieved by restricting the entry of sodium ions into the shoot (restricted<br />
uptake, retention in the roots), whereas toler<strong>an</strong>ce requires either<br />
excretion through salt gl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s, or compartmentalization in stem, leaf<br />
sheath, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> older leaves (Flowers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yeo, 1989). The potassiumsodium<br />
absorption <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its distribution in different pl<strong>an</strong>t parts is also <strong>an</strong><br />
import<strong>an</strong>t selection criterion for selecting salt-toler<strong>an</strong>t cultivars (Devitt<br />
et ah, 1980; Gregorio <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senadhira, 1993; Asch et al, 1997). Toler<strong>an</strong>t<br />
varieties such as Pokkali, Nona Bokra, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> SR 26B excluded Na content<br />
in shoots, absorbed more K, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> had lower Na-K ratios (Gregorio <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Senadhira, 1993). Asch et al. (1997) studied Na-K ratio compartmentalization<br />
in the top three leaves, older leaves, stem, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leaf sheath.<br />
They observed lower ratios in toler<strong>an</strong>t cultivars in the top three leaves.<br />
In response to sodium chloride, stressed pl<strong>an</strong>ts accumulate<br />
osmoprotective subst<strong>an</strong>ces such as proline <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> trehalose. Seedling vigor,<br />
vegetative growth, lodging, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>t height are also import<strong>an</strong>t traits<br />
for dilution of salts, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> should be considered for selecting salt-toler<strong>an</strong>t<br />
rice varieties.<br />
Zinc is <strong>an</strong> essential catalyst in the s)mthesis of auxins in pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Zinc<br />
deficiency reduces alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity in roots under<br />
<strong>an</strong>aerobic conditions after flooding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leads to a subsequent drop in<br />
ATP production (Moore <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Patrick, 1988).<br />
Iron toxicity is mainly caused by <strong>an</strong> increase in ferrous concentrations<br />
in the soil solution. Easily decomposable org<strong>an</strong>ic matter <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
initial low soil pH reduce the ferric oxide (active Fe). Anaerobic<br />
»!■
B.N. Singh 229<br />
microbial activity also stimulates release (Ponnamperuma, 1965).<br />
The critical level for iron toxicity in pl<strong>an</strong>ts at maturity is 300 mg Fe kg“^.<br />
The exact mech<strong>an</strong>ism of varietal differences in toler<strong>an</strong>ce to iron toxicity<br />
is not clear, but it may be due to exclusion of iron in the oxidizing<br />
rhizosphere, reduced tr<strong>an</strong>slocation of iron, toler<strong>an</strong>ce for high iron levels<br />
in the pl<strong>an</strong>t tissues, or a combination of these factors (Jayawardena et ai,<br />
1977).<br />
Sufficient amounts of silica in rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts enh<strong>an</strong>ce resist<strong>an</strong>ce to blast<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other fungal <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bacterial pathogens associated with grain<br />
discoloration (Winslow et al., 1997). It provides a glass like coating on<br />
the epidermal surface that blocks penetration by pathogens.<br />
Germplasm Evaluation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Breeding for Toler<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Selection from the l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> race collections from a salt-affected area has<br />
been one of the appropriate <strong>breeding</strong> methods (Table 10.2). Some<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>t rice varieties Damodar, Dasal, Getu, Patnai 23, Pokalli,<br />
Nonasail—are the selections from the l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> races of coastal saline areas<br />
of West Bengal <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kerela, India (B<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>hopadhyay <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sinha, 1985).<br />
Jhona 349 was selected from the Punjab <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hary<strong>an</strong>a for toler<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />
inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> salinity. One of the early <strong>breeding</strong> lines of IRRI, IR 6-156-2, was<br />
found suitable for saline soils of Sind province in Pakist<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is still<br />
widely grown (Somoro <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> McLe<strong>an</strong>, 1972). Mahsuri, a variety<br />
developed in Malaysia, through the FAO Indica/Japonica hybridization<br />
program, is P efficient <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> toler<strong>an</strong>t to zinc deficiency. It is the most<br />
widely grown variety in India, Nepal, B<strong>an</strong>gladesh, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> My<strong>an</strong>mar. In<br />
India, in the coastal saline area of Maharastra, P<strong>an</strong>vel varieties, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for<br />
inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> salinity rice varieties such as Usar 1, Co 43, PVR 1, MR 18, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
m<strong>an</strong>y other improved varieties have been developed by the pedigree<br />
method (Salvi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chav<strong>an</strong>, 1983; R<strong>an</strong>a, 1986), CSRIO, a high-yielding<br />
semidwarf cultivar has been released for cultivation in inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> saline<br />
areas of India. It yields <strong>an</strong> average of 4 t ha"^ in salt-affected soils,<br />
without amendments. Its cultivation for three consecutive years<br />
improves soil <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reduces sodicity stress (Mishra et al., 1992). IR 42 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
IR 64 are other improved semidwarf rice cultivars toler<strong>an</strong>t to P <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zn<br />
deficiency, saliiuty, alkalinity, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> iron <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> boron toxicity (Khush, 1987).<br />
Both varieties are widely grown in m<strong>an</strong>y countries. From traditional<br />
donors for salt toler<strong>an</strong>ce, improved lines such as IR 4595-4-1-1-3<br />
(Pokkali), IR 9884-54-3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR 10198-66-2 (Nona Bokra), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR 10206-<br />
29-2-1 (SR 26B) have been developed by the pedigree <strong>breeding</strong> method<br />
(Chaubey <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senadhira, 1994), In coastal saline areas, where<br />
waterlogging is a problem, intermediate stature, photosensitive varieties<br />
are required. Through somaclonal variation, semidwarf lines from
230 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Pokkali were developed, which could be further used in <strong>breeding</strong><br />
programs (Senadhira et al, 1994).<br />
Table 10.2<br />
Traditional <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> inxproved rice varieties with a higher level of<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce to soil stresses<br />
!•!■<br />
Stress Traditional cultivars Improved cultivars<br />
Inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Damodar, Getu, Dasal, Jhona 349, IR30,IR32,IR36,CSR10,<br />
salinity Kalarata Cit<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>uy, Usarl, Co43, MR18<br />
Coastal Pokali, Rajasal, Nona Bokra, Nona sai IR8, Rok5, IR64, IR4630-22-2,<br />
salinity 1, Patnai 23, Vy tilla 1, SR 26B P<strong>an</strong>vel 1<br />
Akalinity<br />
Acid<br />
sulfate<br />
Cheriviruppu, Damodar, Basmati<br />
370, DA 29<br />
KDML105, Bahagia<br />
ÍR6(IR6-15ó-2)<br />
SungaiLilin (IRl 1288-B-B-69-<br />
1), NN2B (IR2823-399-5-6),<br />
NN5B (IR4570-83-3-3), IR2151-<br />
196-3-1-3><br />
IR 2153-26-3-5-6<br />
Peat soils Bengaw<strong>an</strong>, Kuatik Putih, Lay<strong>an</strong>g IR64, Sungallin (IR11288-B-B-<br />
69-1)<br />
P deficiency Patnai 23, SR 26 B, Jhona 349,<br />
KDML 105, H4<br />
IR5, IR20, IR28, IR42, IR54,<br />
IR60, IR62, IR64, Mahsuri<br />
Zinc Getu, Madhukar, Nam Sagui 19, BG90-2, IR20, IR32, IR34, IR42,<br />
deficiency Pokkali, Bhura ratta Rasi, Govind (lET 6155), RAU<br />
4009-3, RAU4005-26<br />
Iron Azucena, Palaw<strong>an</strong>, TCA148-3, TCA ÍR36,IR43,Rasi,MTU17,<br />
deficiency 62-31-1 Prabhavati, IET7972, IET7973,<br />
BR34<br />
Iron toxicity<br />
Al toxicity,<br />
upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s<br />
Al toxicity,<br />
lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s<br />
Acid<br />
upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s<br />
Matc<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>u, Kuatik putih, Ngoba,<br />
GÍSSÍ27<br />
CR 94-13, ÍR20, Lemaya,<br />
Suakoko 8,<br />
WITAl, W rr A3, CK4, CK73<br />
Azucena, Palaw<strong>an</strong>, Moroberek<strong>an</strong> Ml-48 IRAT104, lAC 165,<br />
IRAT 122<br />
Salumpikit, Siyam Kuning,<br />
IR29<br />
Gudab<strong>an</strong>g Putih, Siyam, Lemo<br />
Azucena, M55, LAC 23, OS 6 HA 116, UPLRi-5, IRAT 144,<br />
IRAT 104,IRATI33<br />
Salinity toler<strong>an</strong>ce is also a desirable trait in japónica rices. In the<br />
screening of 657 japónica varieties, 19 lines were found toler<strong>an</strong>t.<br />
However, none of the lines had toler<strong>an</strong>ce similar to Pokkali. Namy<strong>an</strong>g 7<br />
was the best line (Lee <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senadhira, 1996). A field screening of 41<br />
genotypes in strip plot design with fresh water <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> saline water<br />
treatment was carried out at Ndiaye, Senegal during both wet <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> dry<br />
seasons (Asch et ah, 1997). Grain yield decline, spikelet sterility, sodium<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> potassium distribution in the top three leaves, stems, stem base <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
roots, were taken as criteria for selecting salt toler<strong>an</strong>ce. Five lines, I Kong<br />
Pao, IR 64, IR 4630-22-2, CSR 10, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Aiwu were observed to be salt<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>t. The potassium/sodium ratio in the three leaves from the top<br />
was high in these genotypes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> this could be used as a reliable index<br />
for salt toler<strong>an</strong>ce.
n<br />
B.N. Singh 231-<br />
Khao Dawk Mali 105, a selection from the l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> races, is a widely<br />
grown variety in add sulfate soils of northeast Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>. An IRRI line, IR<br />
11288-B-B-69-1, has been released as Sungai Lilin in southern Sumatra,<br />
Indonesia for acid sulfate soils. IR64, <strong>an</strong> early maturing semidwarf<br />
variety, has been released as OM8 6 in Vietnam. It is also toler<strong>an</strong>t to add<br />
sulfate soils. In peat soil at Kalim<strong>an</strong>t<strong>an</strong>, Indonesia, some farmers have<br />
started growing two crops in a year. High-yielding semidwarf cultivars<br />
are grown as the first crop, followed by a local photosensitive crop. The<br />
Surj<strong>an</strong> system has also been introduced in some areas (Ismunadji et al,<br />
1991).<br />
Genetic variability exists for toler<strong>an</strong>ce to iron deficiency. Fe-efficient<br />
genotypes c<strong>an</strong> be screened at hot-spot locations. The problem of iron<br />
chlorosis is severe in seedlings grown in dry seeded upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> aerobic<br />
soils. Certain genotypes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> varieties have shown toler<strong>an</strong>ce to iron<br />
chlorosis. These are prabhavati, Rasi, MTU17, IR1561-22-8-3, Basmati 1-<br />
63, PVRl, AUl (T<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>on <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shinde, 1993). At Pusa, Bihar, India, the<br />
problem is severe in calcareous saline sodic, soils. In a screening trial<br />
involving 20 elite lines, only three lines, viz. BR 34, lET 7972, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lET<br />
7973, were found toler<strong>an</strong>t (Singh et al, 1985, 1986).<br />
Zinc deficiency is widespread in different parts of the Indi<strong>an</strong> subcontinent.<br />
In young <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> old alluvial calcareous soil of northern Bihar, 50<br />
to 80% soils are zinc deficient. A field screening of 50 promising lines<br />
was carried out at Pusa, Bihar (Singh et al, 1981). Based on the number<br />
of hills infested in a 10 to 15 m^plot, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> maximum score from 3<br />
replications, only two lines, viz. RAU4005t26 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> RAU4009-3, were<br />
observed as toler<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the other four, RAU4005-57, Govind (UPR 82-<br />
1-7), RAU9-31-2-1, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR2071-586-5-6-3 were moderately toler<strong>an</strong>t.<br />
Other released varieties such as like Jaya, Prasad, Sita, Ratna, Rajendra<br />
Dh<strong>an</strong>l, IR36 were found susceptible to highly susceptible. This is one of<br />
the major reasons for low acceptability of modern semidwarf varieties<br />
in northern Bihar.<br />
Genetic evaluation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>breeding</strong> for problem soil toler<strong>an</strong>ce have<br />
been systematically carried out at IRRI, Philippines. The selected donors<br />
were used in hybridization programs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>breeding</strong> lines were screened<br />
for various traits like salinity, alkalinity, iron toxicity, peatiness, P, Zn<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fe deficiencies, arid Al, Mn <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> B toxicities; Up to December 1992,<br />
about 200,000 lines had been screened at IRRI, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> about 15% were<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>t (De Datta et al, 1994), M<strong>an</strong>y improved lines with higher yield<br />
potential <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> resist<strong>an</strong>ce to different diseases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pests have been<br />
developed from traditional donors. Some of them are already being<br />
grown in m<strong>an</strong>y problem soil areas (Table 10.2) Rapid generation adv<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
(RGA) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> shuttle <strong>breeding</strong> were used to raise two to three generations<br />
each year. Anther culture of Fj allows the rapid fixation of homozygosity
232 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
1.<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> signific<strong>an</strong>tly reduces the <strong>breeding</strong> cycle, Zapata et al (1991)<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sferred the salinity toler<strong>an</strong>ce from toler<strong>an</strong>t varieties through <strong>an</strong>ther<br />
culture. One of the lines ACj, performed well under botii saline <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> non<br />
saline conditions.<br />
Screening for iron toxicity was one of the major <strong>breeding</strong> objectives<br />
at WARDA <strong>research</strong> station at Suakoko, Liberia, UTA <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> WARDA<br />
<strong>research</strong> stations at Edozhigi, Nigeria, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Korhogo, Ivory Coast. For<br />
iron toxicity, over 30,000 lines have been screened so far at different<br />
stations of WARDA <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IITA. Most of the lines, including such highyielding<br />
varieties as IR5, Bouake 189, ITA212, ITA306, BG90-2, IR46,<br />
ITA123, were severely affected by bronzing <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> were susceptible,<br />
Matc<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>u <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Gissi 27 were identified as donors for toler<strong>an</strong>ce to iron<br />
toxicity. Suakoko 8 , <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Suakoko 1 2 were released as varieties toler<strong>an</strong>t<br />
to iron toxicity from WARDA center in Liberia. Suakoko 8 was later<br />
released in Sierra Leone as ROK 24 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is still a widely grown variety of<br />
inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> valley swamps, Suakoko 8 was selected from a cross between<br />
Siam 25 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Malunja <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> introduced from Malaysia as line 2526 in 1973<br />
(Virm<strong>an</strong>i et al, 1978), WITA 1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> WITA 3 were recently released in the<br />
Ivory coast for iron toxicity areas. CK4, CK73, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CK263 are the other<br />
varieties released in Guinea Conakry. WITA 1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> WITA 4 have been<br />
found toler<strong>an</strong>t to iron toxicity in Nigeria (Sahrawat <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh, 1995,<br />
1998). In Indonesia, varieties such as Kapuas <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bat<strong>an</strong>g Ombilin, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
in Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka-BWlOO, BW267-3, BW272-6B, are recommended for iron<br />
toxic areas (Ismumadji et al, 1991; Gunatilaka, 1994),<br />
For Al toxicity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P deficiency, screening methods in culture<br />
solution have been developed at IRRI to screen a large number of lines<br />
(Chaubey et al, 1994, Khatiwada et al, 1996). Toler<strong>an</strong>ce to Al toxicity is a<br />
major <strong>breeding</strong> objective at CIAT Cali, Colombia. A large number of<br />
lines are screened routinely (Sarkarung, 1986), Only toler<strong>an</strong>t lines are<br />
further evaluated in yield tiials. Screening for toler<strong>an</strong>ce to acid upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s<br />
is one of the major <strong>breeding</strong> objectives at WARDA, Bouake, Ivory Coast.<br />
Screening of lines is routinely carried out near M<strong>an</strong>. The soil is <strong>an</strong> Ultisol<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> toler<strong>an</strong>ce to P deficiency is one of the major selection criteria. Some<br />
of the newly released varieties, e.g. WAB56-50, WAB56-125, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
WAB56-104, had better P efficiency th<strong>an</strong> IDSA6 (Sahrawat et al, 1997).<br />
Tropical japónica varieties were more adapted to add upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
ecology in West Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Latin America. Winslow et al, (1997)<br />
observed that they have higher Si content (93%) in their hush compared<br />
to indica genotypes. They also exhibit better resist<strong>an</strong>ce to grain<br />
discoloration th<strong>an</strong> indicas. These differences between the ecotypes<br />
suggest their adaptation mech<strong>an</strong>ism to Si-deficient soils.
?<br />
B.N. Singh 233<br />
GENETICS OF TOLÉRANCE<br />
Genetic studies of toler<strong>an</strong>ce have been carried out for certain traits such<br />
as salt toler<strong>an</strong>ce, iron toxicity, P efficiency, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> A1 toxicity toler<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />
Jones (1986) studied the <strong>genetics</strong> of salt toler<strong>an</strong>ce in two m<strong>an</strong>grove<br />
swamp varieties, viz. Pokali <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pa Merr 108A at Rokupr, Sierra Leone.<br />
The relative root length in saline <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nonsaline culture solution was<br />
taken as a criterion for measuring salt toler<strong>an</strong>ce. Additive genetic<br />
variation, maternal effects, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive segregation were observed<br />
in parents <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> progenies. Akbar et al. (1986) studied the <strong>genetics</strong> of salt<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce in Pokkali, Nona Bokra, Damodar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jhona 349. Growing<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts in a nutrient solution medium, Yoshida et al. (1976) carried out<br />
genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis. Data were taken on Na <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ca levels at the seedling<br />
stage, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yield per pl<strong>an</strong>t. Both additive <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> domin<strong>an</strong>ce effects were<br />
observed for the traits studied.<br />
Gregorio <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senadhira (1993) reported the <strong>genetics</strong> of salinity<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce in Nona Bokra, Pokkali, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> SR 26B using the culture solution<br />
method. Na-K ratio was used as a criterion for selecting parents <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
crosses with high general <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> specific combining abilities. Improved<br />
lines were good general combiners <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reciprocal differences were<br />
observed, suggesting that toler<strong>an</strong>t parents should be used as female<br />
parents in crosses.<br />
Abifarin (1986) reported a single domin<strong>an</strong>t gene in Suakoko 8 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a<br />
recessive gene in Gissi 27 for toler<strong>an</strong>ce to iron toxicity. The genes in two<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t lines were nonallelic, which shows that more toler<strong>an</strong>t pl<strong>an</strong>ts<br />
could be recovered from the segregating generations of the two crosses.<br />
Chaubey et al. (1994) studied the <strong>genetics</strong> of P deficiency in lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice<br />
varieties. Relative ability to tiller under P-deficient <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P-suppIemented<br />
nutrient medium was used to classify the genotypes. The toler<strong>an</strong>t<br />
parents—^IR 20, IR 28, IR 54 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mahsuri— showed recessive genes for<br />
P efficiency. Both additive <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> domin<strong>an</strong>t gene effects were observed in<br />
the toler<strong>an</strong>t parents. IR 54, Mahsuri <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR20 were good general<br />
combiners. Khatiwada et al. (1996) have studied the <strong>genetics</strong> of Al<br />
toxicity in upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice cultivars, IRAT 104, Moroberek<strong>an</strong>,<br />
IR 43 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR 29. In a diallel study of parents <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> F|, upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> varieties<br />
were found to be good general combiners. Reciprocal effects were also<br />
observed. In such situations, toler<strong>an</strong>t parents should be used as female<br />
parents in crosses.<br />
PREBREEDING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY<br />
In coastal areas of India <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> B<strong>an</strong>gladesh, pl<strong>an</strong>ts of Porteresia coarctata, of<br />
the tribe oryzeae, contain high Na <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tolerate high salinity. The
234 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
mech<strong>an</strong>ism seems to be tissue toler<strong>an</strong>ce. Oryza rufipogon <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
glaberrima germplasm are known for their toler<strong>an</strong>ce to acidity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> iron<br />
toxicity. There is a need to select donors with a high degree of toler<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to incorporate these traits into improved germplasm. Somaclonal<br />
variation has been used to select high-yielding salt toler<strong>an</strong>t lines, which<br />
c<strong>an</strong> also be used as donors in <strong>breeding</strong> programs (Senadhira et al, 1994).<br />
In bread wheat, Triticum aestimm L., a single locus, Knal, has been<br />
identified, which controls Na"^ exclusion in roots <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> enh<strong>an</strong>ces K^/Na"^<br />
ratio in the shoots <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> salt toler<strong>an</strong>ce (Dvorak et at, 1994). The existence<br />
of such genes in rice should be explored. Recent biotechnological tools<br />
c<strong>an</strong> help in isolating such genes, cloning <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> incorporating them in a<br />
high-yielding background, even from the related <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> alien species.<br />
GERMPLASM EXCHANGE, SEED PRODUCTION AND<br />
TECHNOLOGY DISSEMINATION<br />
Toler<strong>an</strong>ce to nutrient toxicity or deficiency is one of the major traits for<br />
selecting higher yielding cultivars for problem soils. Growth duration,<br />
non-lodging, resist<strong>an</strong>ce to location-specific disease <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insect resist<strong>an</strong>ce,<br />
photoperiod sensitivity, grain type, pericarp color <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other attributes<br />
decide the acceptability of a line. In temperate regions, toler<strong>an</strong>ce to cold,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grain quality are some other major criteria for varietal selections.<br />
The earliest recorded introduction <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> germplasm exch<strong>an</strong>ge of a salttoler<strong>an</strong>t<br />
variety is Pokkali, a selection from a l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> race in Kerala, India,<br />
to Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka in 1939. It was recommended for cultivation in 1945 on<br />
saline rice l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s of the West Coast (Fern<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>o, 1949). IRRI, through its<br />
International <strong>Rice</strong> Testing Program (IRTP) since 1976 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> later through<br />
the International Network for Genetic Evaluation in <strong>Rice</strong> (INGER), has<br />
played a major role in germplasm exch<strong>an</strong>ge among different ricegrowing<br />
countries. The two nurseries viz., IRSATON (International <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Salinity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Alkalinity Toler<strong>an</strong>ce Observational Nursery), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IRALON<br />
(International <strong>Rice</strong> Acid Lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Soils Observational Nursery) were<br />
involved in distribution of lines from ÎRRI <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> national programs. In<br />
West Africa, improved germplasm <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> segregating populations are<br />
distributed to NARS through the lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice <strong>breeding</strong> task force<br />
(Sahrawat <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh, 1995).<br />
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT<br />
A toler<strong>an</strong>t variety alone c<strong>an</strong>not increase the production potential from<br />
adverse soils. But growing of a toler<strong>an</strong>t variety will reduce the dosage of<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t nutrients <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soil amendments. It is essential to take <strong>an</strong> integrated<br />
approach to increase productivity from such soils. Green m<strong>an</strong>uring with
B.N. Singh 235<br />
I<br />
Sesb<strong>an</strong>ia is a useful practice for rn<strong>an</strong>agement of saline <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sodic soils.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> is the most favored crop in such soils. Nitrogen up to 160 kg in 3-^<br />
splits as ammonium sulfate has been found better th<strong>an</strong> urea^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> c<strong>an</strong><br />
yield up to 8 t ha'\ Use of slow release fertilizers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sulfur-coated or<br />
lac-coated urea has shown promise in saline soils. Use of gypsum <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
leaching reduces sodidty. For m<strong>an</strong>agement of iron-toxic soils^r cultural<br />
practices such as early pl<strong>an</strong>tings drainage of fields <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>ting on the<br />
ridges (Winslow et ai, 1989), use of sufficient P, K, Ca, Mg, Si, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zn<br />
nutrients, in addition to pl<strong>an</strong>ting toler<strong>an</strong>t varieties, will increase the<br />
production potential from such soils (Fatra <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Moh<strong>an</strong>ty, 1989;<br />
Sahrawat <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh, 1995).<br />
Application of P <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> K should be increased one <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> half times over<br />
the normal dose. Use of basic slag at the rate of 10--151 ha“^will reduce<br />
the silicon deficiency in soils. Either soil or foliar application with zinc<br />
sulfate c<strong>an</strong> correct Zn deficiency. Application of zinc sulfate (20% zinc)<br />
at the rate of 25 kg ha'^ suffices for growing six crops. When symptoms<br />
of zinc deficiency appear in the field, a spray of 1 % zinc sulfate with<br />
0.5% lime will alleviate the deficiency symptoms. Application of rock<br />
phosphate has been suggested in acid upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soils (P<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a, 1987). In acid<br />
sulfate soils, liming, P <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> K application, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> drainage where possible<br />
reduce the adverse effect in such soils. In the Mekong delta, 3-6 tons of<br />
lime, 22 kg P ha'^, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong> early plowing immediately after flood<br />
recession is recommended to m<strong>an</strong>age the acid sulfate soils with high Al<br />
toxicity (V<strong>an</strong> Mensvoort et al, 1985). Peat soils c<strong>an</strong> be productive by<br />
growing wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice with toler<strong>an</strong>t varieties, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> N, P, K, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zn<br />
fertilizer use. Sulfur deficiency c<strong>an</strong> be corrected by application of sulfur<br />
at the rate of 11 kg ha'^. Application of pyrites, gypsum, ammonium<br />
sulfate, m<strong>an</strong>g<strong>an</strong>ese sulfate, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> single superphosphate alleviates S<br />
deficiency. Raising paddy seedling under puddled or flooded condition<br />
will reduce iron chlorosis. Soil application of ferrous sulfate has not<br />
proven to be a corrective measure. Two to three foliar sprays of 1%<br />
ferrous sulfate or Fe-chelates, mixed with 1% lemon (vitamin C) will<br />
reduce chlorosis damage (T<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>on <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shinde, 1993). Application of<br />
lime <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P fertilizer alleviates Al toxicity damage in acid upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>. Seawater<br />
intrusion in acid sulfate soils reduces the effect of Al toxicity.<br />
CONCLUSIONS AND FOLLOW-UP<br />
Problem soils are the most potential areas of food production to meet<br />
the growing dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> of the increasing world population. Productivity<br />
from such soils c<strong>an</strong> be increased through selecting toler<strong>an</strong>t varieties <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
applying appropriate soil amendments. Characterization of problem
236 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
soils is the primary step to develop <strong>an</strong> integrated approach for<br />
m<strong>an</strong>agement of such soils. Screening for salinity, zinc deficiency, P<br />
defficiency, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> iron toxicity should be the four major areas for largescale<br />
screening. Pre<strong>breeding</strong> will help in broadening the genetic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
physiological basis of resist<strong>an</strong>ce. Biotechnology c<strong>an</strong> help in tagging,<br />
cloning, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> incorporating genes for toler<strong>an</strong>ce to different stresses.<br />
There is a need to share the available <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> new information through<br />
small working groups. Farmer participation in problem identification,<br />
technology testing <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>sfer, technology targeting, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> training are<br />
essential. Modeling would provide <strong>an</strong> essential tool in characterization<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> problem solving. Seed production of new varieties <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> availability<br />
of soil amendments at the proper time are essential in technology<br />
dissemination. International centers such as IRRI, CIAT, WARDA, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
IWMI in collaboration with institutions in developed countries, NARS,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> NGOs should strengthen the upward <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> downward <strong>research</strong>.<br />
There is need to have task forces to provide small gr<strong>an</strong>ts for thematic<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> focussed <strong>research</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> development activities. Public awareness<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>nual mettings on "M<strong>an</strong>agement of problem soils for rice<br />
cultivation" at different centers should be essential activities in future.<br />
Acknowledgment<br />
The author expresses his gratitude to Dr. K.L. Sahrawat, soil scientist at<br />
WARDA, for valuable discussion <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> critical comments on the<br />
m<strong>an</strong>uscript.<br />
References<br />
i!« >:<br />
Abifarin, A.O. 1986. Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of toler<strong>an</strong>ce to iron toxicity in two rice cultivars. In: <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genetics, IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 423-428.<br />
Abrol, I.P. 1986. Salt affected soils: Problems <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> prospects in developing countries. In:<br />
Global Aspects of Food Production M.S. Swaminath<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> S.K. Sinha (eds.) IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila,<br />
Philippines, pp. 283-305.<br />
Akbar, M. 1975. Water <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chloride absorption in rice seedlings. /. Agrie. Res. 13:341-343.<br />
Akbar, M., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> HilleRis Lambers, D. 1986. Genetics of salt toler<strong>an</strong>ce in rice. In:<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Genetics, pp. 399-409.<br />
Anjos Cutrim, V.D., Ngugen, T. V., Silva, f.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Galvo, J.D. 1981. Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of toler<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />
aluminium toxicity in Brazili<strong>an</strong> rice. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newslett. 6(4): 9.<br />
Asch, F., Dingkuhn, M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Dorffling, K. 1997. Physiological stresses of irrigated rice caused<br />
by soil salinity in the Sahel. In: Irrigated <strong>Rice</strong> in the Sahel: Prospects for Sustainable Development<br />
K.M, Miez<strong>an</strong>, M.C.S. Woperies, M,Dingkuhn, J, Deckers, T.F. R<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>olph (eds.).<br />
West Africa <strong>Rice</strong> Development Association, pp. 247-274.<br />
B<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>yopadhyay, A.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sinha, T.S. 1985. <strong>Rice</strong> Cultivation in Coastal Saline Soils. Better<br />
F<strong>an</strong>ning in Salt Affected Soils. Series 10. Central Soil Salinity Res. Inst., Karnal, India.<br />
Bari, G., Hamid, A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Aw<strong>an</strong>, M.A. 1973. Effect of salinity on germination <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> seedling<br />
growth of rice varieties. IRC Neivletl. 22 (3): 32-36.
I j<br />
B.N. Singh 237<br />
Boje-Klein, G. 1986. Problem soils as potential areas for adverse soils toler<strong>an</strong>t varieties in<br />
south <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> southeast Asia. IRRI Research Paper Series Vol. 119,53 pp.<br />
Chaubey, C.N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senadhira, D. 1994. Conventional pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>breeding</strong> for toler<strong>an</strong>ce to problem<br />
soils. Theor. Appl. Genet. Monograph, 21:11-36.<br />
Chaubey, C.N., Senadhira, D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Gregorio, G.B. 1994. Genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis of toler<strong>an</strong>ce for<br />
phosphorus deficiency in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 313-317.<br />
Coronel, V.P., Akita, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yoshida, S. 1990. Aluminium toxicity toler<strong>an</strong>ce in rice seedlings,<br />
la Pl<strong>an</strong>t Nutrition-Physiology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Applications M.L. V<strong>an</strong> Beusichem (ed.). Kluwer<br />
Academic Publ., The Netherl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s pp. 357-363.<br />
De Datta, S.K., Neue, H.U., Senadhira, D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Quij<strong>an</strong>o, C. 1994. Success in rice improvements<br />
for poor soils 1994. In: Proc. Workshop on Adaptation of Pl<strong>an</strong>ts to Soil Stresses. August 1-4,<br />
1993, Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska.<br />
Devitt, D., Jarrell, W.M., Stevenes, K.L. 1980. Sodium-Potassium ratios in soil solutions <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t response under saline conditions. Soil Sei. Soc. Am. J. 45:80-86.<br />
Driessen, P.M, 1978. Peat Soils, In: Soils <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice, IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 763-779.<br />
Dvorak, J., Noam<strong>an</strong>, M.M., Goyal, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Gorham, J. 1994. Enh<strong>an</strong>cement of the salt toler<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
of Tniicwm turgidum by the Knal locus tr<strong>an</strong>sferred from theTnfici/m aestivum chromosome<br />
4D by homeologous recombination. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87:872-877.<br />
Fern<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>o, L.H. 1949. The perform<strong>an</strong>ce of salt resist<strong>an</strong>t paddy, Pokkali, in Ceylon. Trop.<br />
Agric. 105:124-126.<br />
Flowers, T J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yeo, A.R. 1989. Effects of salinity on pl<strong>an</strong>t growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> crop yield. In:<br />
Environmental Stress in Pl<strong>an</strong>tsj.H. Cherry (ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.<br />
Flowers, T.J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yeo, A.R. 1995. Breeding for salinity resist<strong>an</strong>ce in crop pl<strong>an</strong>ts: where next?<br />
Aust. J, Pl<strong>an</strong>t Physiol. 22; 875-884.<br />
Ghassemi, F., Jakem<strong>an</strong>, A.J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nix, H.A. 1995. Salinisation of l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> water resources.<br />
Hum<strong>an</strong> causes, m<strong>an</strong>agement <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> case studies. C<strong>an</strong>berra, Australia. Centre for Resource<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Environmental studies.<br />
Gleick, P.H, 1993. Water in crisis; A guide to the world's fresh water resources. Oxford<br />
University Press, New York, USA.<br />
Gregorio, G.B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senadhira, D. 1993. Genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis of salinity toler<strong>an</strong>ce in rice. Theor.<br />
Appl. Genet. 86: 333-338.<br />
Giinatilaka, G. A. 1994. <strong>Rice</strong> production in relation to iron toxic soils in Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka, In: <strong>Rice</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Problem Soils in South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia. D. Senadhira (ed.). IRRI Discussion paper series,<br />
4, IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines pp. 109-114.<br />
Gupta, R.J. 1994. Groundwater quality for irrigation. In: Salinity M<strong>an</strong>agement for Sustainable<br />
Agriculture. D.L.N. Rao, N.T. Singh, R.K. Gupta, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> N.K. Tyagi. (eds.) Central Soil<br />
salinity Research Institute, Karnal, India, pp. 89-100.<br />
Howeler, R.H, 1973. Iron induced or<strong>an</strong>ging disease of rice in relation to physiochemical<br />
ch<strong>an</strong>ges in a flooded oxisol. Soil Sei. Soc. Amer. Proc. 37:898-903.<br />
Howeler, R.H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cadavid, L.F. 1976. Screening for rice cultivars to A1 toxicity in nutrient<br />
solution as compared with a field screening method. Agron.}. 68:551-555.<br />
Hu<strong>an</strong>g, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rozelle, S. 1993. Environmental stress <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grain yield in China. Resource<br />
paper for the Dubos forum. Technology Prospects for Sustainable Agriculture.<br />
Ikehashi, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ponnamperuma, F.N. 1976. Varietal toler<strong>an</strong>ce of rice for adverse soils. In:<br />
Soils <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong>. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp 801-823.<br />
IRRI. 1996. St<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard Evaluation System for rice (4th ed.), July 1996, INGER, IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila,<br />
Philippines, 52 pp.<br />
Ismunadji, M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Soepardi, G. 1984. Peat soils problems <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> crop production. In: Orgawic<br />
Matter <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong>. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 489-502.
238 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
iim i<br />
i lii ;■<br />
■ i<br />
I<br />
Ismunadji, M., Ardjasa, W.S, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Von Uexkull, H.R. 1991. Increasing productivity of iron<br />
toxic soils of Indonesia. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Production on the Acid Soils of the Tropics, pp. 213-217. P,<br />
Deturck <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> F.N. Ponnamperuma (eds,). Institute of Fundamental Studies, K<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>y,<br />
Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka.<br />
Jayawardena, S.D.G., Watabe, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>aka, K. 1977. Relation between oxidizing power<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> resist<strong>an</strong>ce to iron toxicity in rice. Rep, Soc. Crop Sei. Breed. Kinki, Jap<strong>an</strong> 22:35-47.<br />
Jones, M.P. 1986. Genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis of salt toler<strong>an</strong>ce in m<strong>an</strong>grove swamp rice. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics.<br />
IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 411-422.<br />
Jones, U.S., Katyal, J.C., Mamaril, C.P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Park, C.S. 1982, Wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice nutrient deficiencies<br />
other th<strong>an</strong> Nitrogen. In; <strong>Rice</strong> Research Strategies for the Future. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines<br />
pp. 327-378.<br />
Karim, M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Majlish, M.A.K. 1958. A study of the formative effects of sulphur on rice<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t. Pak. J. Sei. Res. 10:52<br />
Khatiwada, S.P., Senadhira, D., Carpena, A.L., Zeigler, R.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fern<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ez, P.G. 1996.<br />
Variability <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>genetics</strong> of toler<strong>an</strong>ce for aluminium toxicity in rice. Theor, Appl. Genet. 93:<br />
738-744.<br />
Khush, G.S. 1987. <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>breeding</strong>: past, present <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> future. J. Genet. 66(3): 195-216.<br />
Kijne, J.W., Prathapar, S.A., Wopereis, M.C.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sahrawat, K.L. 1998. How to m<strong>an</strong>age<br />
salinity in irrigated l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s: A selective review with particular reference to developing<br />
countries. SWIM Paper 2, International Irrigation Water M<strong>an</strong>agement Institute, Colombo,<br />
Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka.<br />
Lee, K.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senadhira, D. 1996. Salinity toler<strong>an</strong>ce in Japónica rice. SABRAO /. 28 (1); 11-17.<br />
Maas, E.V. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hoffm<strong>an</strong>, G.J. 1997. Crop salt toler<strong>an</strong>ce: current assessment./. Irrg. Drainage<br />
Div. ASCE 103:115-134,<br />
Mishra, B., Singh, R.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bhattacharya, R.K. 1992, CSR10, a newly released dwarf rice for<br />
salt affected soils. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. hiotest 17(1); 19.<br />
Moore, P.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Patrick, W.FL 1988. Effect of zinc deficiency on alcohol dehydrogenase<br />
activity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nutrient uptake in rice. Agron.}. 80 :882-885.<br />
Moorm<strong>an</strong>, P.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> V<strong>an</strong> Breem<strong>an</strong>, N. 1978. <strong>Rice</strong>: Soil, Water, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> L<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila,<br />
Philippines, 185 pp.<br />
Munns, R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Richards, R.A. 1998. Improving crop productivity in saline soils. In: Crop<br />
Productivity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sustainability: Shaping the Future Proc. 2nd Int. Crop Sei. Cong. 1996. L.<br />
Chopra, R.B, Singh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> A. Verma (eds.), Oxford <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IBH Publishing, New Delhi, pp. 453-<br />
465.<br />
Nene, Y.L. 1966. Symptoms cause <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> control of Khaira disease of paddy. Bull. Indi<strong>an</strong><br />
Phytopath. Soc. 3; 97-101.<br />
Ottow, J.C.G., Prade, K., Bertembreiter, W, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jacq, V.A. 1991. Strategies to alleviate iron<br />
toxicity of wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice on acid sulphate soil. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Production on Acid Soils of the tropics.<br />
P. Detruck <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ponnamperuma (eds.). Institute of Fundamental Studies, K<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>y, Sri<br />
L<strong>an</strong>ka.<br />
P<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a, N. 1987. Acid soils of eastern India: Their chemistry <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> m<strong>an</strong>agement. /. Indi<strong>an</strong> Soc.<br />
Soil Sn. 35:568-581.<br />
Patra, B.N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Moh<strong>an</strong>ty, S.K. 1989. Effects of amendments on tr<strong>an</strong>sformations of Fe <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mn<br />
in iron toxic soils under submergence. Ind. Soc. Soil Sei, 37:276-283.<br />
Pearson, G.A., Ayers, A.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Eberhard, D.L. 1966. Relative salt toler<strong>an</strong>ce of rice during<br />
germination <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> early seedling development. Soil Sei. 102:151-156.<br />
Ponnamperuma, F.N. 1965, Dynamic aspects of flooded soils <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the nutrition of rice pl<strong>an</strong>t.<br />
In; The Mineral Nutrition of the <strong>Rice</strong> Pl<strong>an</strong>t. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Maryl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>,<br />
pp. 295-298.
vt<br />
B.N, Singh 239<br />
Ponnampemma, F.N. 1984. Role of cultivar toler<strong>an</strong>ce in increasing rice production in saline<br />
l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s. In; Salinity Toler<strong>an</strong>ce in Pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Strategies for Crop Improvements. R.C. Staples <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
G.H. Toenniessen. (eds.). Wiley Inlerscience, New York pp 255-271.<br />
Ponnamperuma, F.N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> B<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>yopadhya, A.K. 1980. Soil salinity as a constraint on food<br />
production in the humid torpics. In: Priorities for Alleviating Soil Related Constraints to Food<br />
Production in the Tropics. IRRh M<strong>an</strong>ila^ Philippines, pp. 203-216.<br />
Ponnamperuma, F.N., Bradfield, R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Peek, M. 1955. Physiological disease of rice<br />
attributable to iron toxicity. Nature 175:265,<br />
R<strong>an</strong>a, R.S. 1986. Breeding crop varieties for salt affected soil. In: Approaches for Incorporating<br />
Drought <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Salinity Resist<strong>an</strong>ce in Crop PÍBnfs. V.L, Chopra <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> R.S.Paroda (eds.). Oxford<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IBH, New Delhi, pp 25-55.<br />
Rosegr<strong>an</strong>t, M.W., Agcao, li M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Perez, N. 1995. <strong>Rice</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Global Pood Economy:<br />
Projections <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Policy Implications of future Food Bal<strong>an</strong>ces. International Food Policy<br />
Research Institute, Washington, D.C.<br />
Sahrawat, K.L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh, B.N. 1995. M<strong>an</strong>agement of iron toxic soils for lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice<br />
cultivation in West Africa. Proc. Third Afric<strong>an</strong> Soil Science Society Conference, Vol. 28.<br />
pp. 617-624.<br />
Sahrawat, K.L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh, B.N. 1998. Seasonal differences in iron toxicity toler<strong>an</strong>ce of<br />
lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice cultivars. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Notes: 23(1): 18-19,<br />
Sahrawat, K.L., Diatta, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jones, M.P. 1993. Zinc deficiency in upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice. WARD A Ann.<br />
Rep. 1993. pp. 37-38.<br />
Sahrawat, K.L., Jones, M.P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Diatta, S. 1997. Direct <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> residual fertilizer phosphorus<br />
efficiency of upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice in <strong>an</strong> ultisol. Nutrient Cycling in Agrocecosystems. 48; 209-215.<br />
Sahrawat, K.L., Mulbah, C.K., Diatta, S., Delaune, R.D., Patrick, W.H., Singh, B.N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jones,<br />
M.P. 1996. The role of toler<strong>an</strong>t genotypes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>t nutrients in the m<strong>an</strong>agement of iron<br />
toxicity in lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice. /. Agrie. Sei, Cambridge. 126:143-149.<br />
Salvi, P.V. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chav<strong>an</strong>, K.N. 1983. Coastal saline soils of Maharashtra. /. Indi<strong>an</strong> Soc. Coastal<br />
Agrie. Res. 1:21-26.<br />
Sarkarung, S. 1986. Screening upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice for aluminium toler<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce, In:<br />
Progress in Upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 271-281.<br />
Sedberry, J.E., Petreson, F.J., Wilson, E., Nugent, A.L., Engler, R.M, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Brupbacher, R.H.<br />
1971. Effect of zinc <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other elements on the yield of rice l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nutrient content of the rice<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Louisi<strong>an</strong>a State Univ. Agrie Expt. Stn. Bull. 653.<br />
Senadhira, D., Neue, H.U. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Akbar, M. 1994. Development of improved donors for salinity<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce in rice through somaclonal variation. SABRAO J. 26:19-25.<br />
Singh, B.N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh, B.P. 1984. Toler<strong>an</strong>ce to iron deficiency in rice. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newslett.<br />
9(6): 8.<br />
Singh, B.N., Singh, B.P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sinha, M.K. 1981. Relative toler<strong>an</strong>ce of semi-dwarf indica rice<br />
lines to zinc stress in calcareous soils. Ann. Agrie. Res. 2(1-2): 27-32.<br />
Singh, B.N., Fagade, S., Ukwungwu, M.N., Williams, C., Jagtap, S. S., Oladimeji, O., Efisue, A.<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Okhidievbie, O. 1977. <strong>Rice</strong> growing environments <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> biophysical constraints in<br />
different agroecological zones of Nigeria. Mei. /. 2(1): 35-44'.<br />
Singh, P.B., Singh, R.A., Sinha, M.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh, B.N. 1985. Evaluation of technique for<br />
screening Fe-efficient genotypes of rice in calcareous soil. J. Agrie. Sei, Cambridge: 105:<br />
193-197.<br />
Singh, B.P., Sinha, M.K., Singh, R.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh, B.N. 1986. Reaction of genotypes of rice to<br />
iron chlorosis in a calcareous soil. Exp. Agrie. 22:75-78.<br />
Somoro, A.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> McLe<strong>an</strong>, G.W. 1972. High yielding rice varieties in West Pakist<strong>an</strong>. In; Ríce;<br />
Breeding. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 157-159.
ii'<br />
240 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Tagawa, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ishizaka, N. 1963. Physiological sttidies on the toler<strong>an</strong>ce of rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts to<br />
salinity. Proc. Crop Sci. Soc. Jpn. 31: 249-252.<br />
T<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>on, H.L.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shinde, J.E. 1993. Fertility m<strong>an</strong>agement for rice in problem soils of India.<br />
In; Neiv Frontiers in <strong>Rice</strong> Research; K. Muralidhar<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> E.A. Siddiq. (eds.). Directorate of<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research, Hyderabad, India, pp. 315-322,<br />
V<strong>an</strong> Breem<strong>an</strong>, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Moorm<strong>an</strong>n, F.R. 1978. Iron Toxic soils. In: Soils <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong>. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila,<br />
Philippines, pp. 781-800.<br />
V<strong>an</strong> Mensvoort, M.E., L<strong>an</strong>tin, R.S., Brinkm<strong>an</strong>, R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> V<strong>an</strong> Breem<strong>an</strong>, N. 1985. Toxidties of<br />
wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> soils. In: Wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>. Soils: Characteristation, Classification, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Utilisation. IRRI<br />
M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 123-138.<br />
Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S., Tubm<strong>an</strong>, A.F., Sumo, F. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Worzi, P.M, 1978. Suakoko 8, a new rice variety<br />
recommended for iron toxic swamps in Liberia. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Nezoslett, 3; 3~4,<br />
Winslow, M.D., Okada, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Correa-Victoria, F. 1997. Silicon deficiency <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the adaptation<br />
of tropical rice ecotypes. Pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Soil. 188: 239-248.<br />
Winslow, M.D., Yamauchi, M., Alluri, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Masajo, K., 1989. Reducing iron toxicity in rice<br />
with resist<strong>an</strong>t genotype <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ridge pl<strong>an</strong>ting. Agron. J. 81:458-460.<br />
Yoshida, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cast<strong>an</strong>eda, L. 1969. Partial replacement of potassium by sodium In the rice<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t under weakly saline condition. Soil Sci. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Nutr. 15; 183-186.<br />
Yoshida, S., Porno, D.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bhadrachalam, A. 1971. Zinc deficiency of the rice pl<strong>an</strong>t on<br />
calcareous <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> neutral soils in the Philippines. Soil Sci. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Nutr. 17: 83-87.<br />
Yoshida, S., Forno, D.A., Cock, S.H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Gomez, K.A. 1976. Laboratory M<strong>an</strong>ual for<br />
Physiological Studies in <strong>Rice</strong>. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines.<br />
Zapata, F.J., Alejar, M.S., Torrizo, L.B., Novero, A.U., Singh, V.P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senadhira, D. 1991.<br />
Field perform<strong>an</strong>ce of <strong>an</strong>ther culture derived lines from Fj crosses of indica rices under<br />
saline <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nonsaline conditions. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:6-11.<br />
i I<br />
■> t
u<br />
Molecular Marker-Based<br />
Gene Tagging <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Its Impact<br />
on <strong>Rice</strong> Improvement<br />
Qifa Zh<strong>an</strong>g* <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sibin Yu*<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Developments of biotechnology in the last two decades have resulted in<br />
two main technical approaches for genetic m<strong>an</strong>ipulation of the pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
genome, tr<strong>an</strong>sformation, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> marker assisted selection. While<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sformation is dependent on the availability of genes that are isolated<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cloned <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is the subject of a different chapter, the technique of<br />
marker-assisted selection is completely based on mapping <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic<br />
characterization of the genes for the targeted traits. Recent adv<strong>an</strong>ces in<br />
genome <strong>research</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the availability of high-density molecular marker<br />
linkage maps (Causse et ah, 1994; Kurata et ah, 1994) have greatly<br />
facilitated gene mapping <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic <strong>an</strong>alyses in rice. In this chapter, we<br />
shall focus on the present status of gene mapping <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic <strong>an</strong>alyses of<br />
the traits that are the major targets for rice-<strong>breeding</strong> programs worldwide.<br />
We shall also discuss the impacts of such developments on rice<br />
genetic improvement.<br />
* National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University,<br />
Wuh<strong>an</strong> 430070, China
242 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
MAPPING AND GENETIC ANALYSIS OF DISEASE RESISTANCE<br />
i<br />
i i'i'f<br />
Monogenic Resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes have been one of the major subjects for<br />
molecular marker-based mapping <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic <strong>an</strong>alyses. A large number<br />
of studies have been carried out in the last decade for identifying <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
mapping genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to various rice diseases (Table 11.1). All<br />
classes of available molecular markers have been used in the mapping<br />
studies including restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RELPs),<br />
r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>omly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPDs), simple sequence<br />
repeats (SSRs), sequence tagged sites (SSTs)^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> amplified fragment<br />
length polymorphisms (AFLPs). Near isogenic lines (NILs) that were<br />
developed by introgressing the resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene from the donor parent<br />
via repeated back crossing were used extensively for identifying the<br />
linked markers, hence the gene-containing chromosomal regions.<br />
Segregating populations from crosses between NILs was also frequently<br />
used to determine the linkage between molecular markers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
targeted genes. When NILs were not available, bulked segreg<strong>an</strong>t<br />
<strong>an</strong>alysis was also used for identifying linked markers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> segregating<br />
populations, or in some cases only susceptible individuals were used for<br />
calculating the recombination frequencies between markers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
genes.<br />
The studies listed in Table 11.1 were highly concentrated in the two<br />
most import<strong>an</strong>t diseases, fungal blast caused by Pyricularia grísea <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
bacterial leaf blight (BLB) caused by X<strong>an</strong>thomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, that<br />
collectively account for most of the yield losses of rice worldwide due to<br />
diseases. Molecular markers linked to the genes at dist<strong>an</strong>ces within a<br />
few centi-Morg<strong>an</strong> (cM) were identified for the majority of the genes, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
markers fl<strong>an</strong>king the resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes on both sides were also obtained<br />
in a number of cases. In the extreme, cosegregating markers were obtained<br />
for several genes. However, there were also cases in which the<br />
closest markers were not tightly linked to the genes, especially for<br />
markers identified for blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes. Additional markers therefore<br />
should be identified for those genes. It should also be noted that<br />
linked molecular markers have not been found for quite a few blast<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes although the chromosomal locations were determined<br />
previously (McCouch et ah, 1994).<br />
Inspection of the genes listed in Table 11.1 clearly revealed <strong>an</strong><br />
import<strong>an</strong>t feature regarding their distribution. A large cluster of disease<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes is located on chromosome 1 1 , which includes genes for<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BLB, blast, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> viruses. There also appeared to be <strong>an</strong>other<br />
cluster of genes on chromosome 12. The individuality of the resist<strong>an</strong>ce
Qifa Zh<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sibin Yu 243<br />
genes on chromosome 1 1 appears to be evident as judged by the mapping<br />
results; each of the BLB resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes Xa3, Xa4, XalO, Xa21^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Xa22 is mapped to a distinct position. However^ the identities of the<br />
blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes are less clear <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> need further characterization.<br />
For example, the genes Pi-ta <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-ta^ could not be separated even in<br />
large F2 populations (Rybka et al., 1997), It has also been suggested that<br />
Pi-4 is allelic or possibly identical to Pi-ta (Inukai e t 1994).<br />
Qu<strong>an</strong>titative Resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
In addition to the monogenic resist<strong>an</strong>ce that confers complete resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is inherited qualitatively, m<strong>an</strong>y systems of host-pathogen<br />
interactions often result in partial resist<strong>an</strong>ce or qu<strong>an</strong>titative resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
(Young, 1996). While qualitative resist<strong>an</strong>ce conditions compatibility<br />
between the host carrying the specific resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pathogen<br />
strain carrying the corresponding a virulence gene, qu<strong>an</strong>titative<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce reduces the level of disease damage in a compatible reaction.<br />
Because qu<strong>an</strong>titative resist<strong>an</strong>ce places less selection pressure on the<br />
specific pathogen strain th<strong>an</strong> does qualitative resist<strong>an</strong>ce, it is also<br />
believed to be more durable th<strong>an</strong> qualitative resist<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />
There have been several undertakings in mapping qu<strong>an</strong>titative resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
in rice. An outst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing example is the work of W<strong>an</strong>g et al. (1994)<br />
who conducted a qu<strong>an</strong>titative trait locus (QTL) <strong>an</strong>alysis of the blast<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce in the variety "Morobereken" in! various environments. The<br />
experimental population consisted of 281 F7 recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines<br />
(Rlt-s) from a cross between two varieties, '"Morobereken^'— a japónica<br />
cultivar with durable resist<strong>an</strong>ce to blast in Asia, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> "C 039"—a highly<br />
susceptible indica cultivar. They first separated qualitative resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
from qu<strong>an</strong>titative resist<strong>an</strong>ce by identifying RILs showing complete resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
to each of the five isolates used in the test. The RILs that did not<br />
contain genes governing qualitative resist<strong>an</strong>ce were then tested for<br />
qu<strong>an</strong>titative resist<strong>an</strong>ce by inoculation under greenhouse conditions with<br />
the isolate P 06-6 in polycyclic tests. Ten chromosomal segments (QTLs)<br />
were found to be associated with effects on lesion numbers. They also<br />
tested the entire RIL populatiou under field conditions at two blast<br />
screening sites in the Philippines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Indonesia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> foimd that QTLs<br />
identified in greenhouse tests were good predictors of blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce at<br />
the two field sites. A very interesting finding was that three of the<br />
markers reported to be linked to complete resist<strong>an</strong>ce in previous studies<br />
were associated with QTLs for partial resist<strong>an</strong>ce. This led the authors to<br />
propose that complete resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> partial resist<strong>an</strong>ce may be controlled<br />
by the same genes (alleles), showing different reactions to different<br />
isolates of the fungus. Such a hypothesis implies that a resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene
244 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Table 11.1<br />
Genes for disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce that have been tagged using molecular markers<br />
■i.:<br />
¡ I I l i i<br />
4' :|i!<br />
li'hlS<br />
Gene Disease Source of Chromo- Closest Dist<strong>an</strong>ce Reference<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce some markers (cM)<br />
Xa-1 Bacterial Kogyoku 4 Y5212L 0.9 Yoshimura ei 1996<br />
blight C600 0<br />
Y5212R 1.7<br />
Xa-3 Bacterial Chugoku45 11 XnpblSl 2.3 Yoshimura et al., 1995<br />
blight<br />
Xa-4 Bacterial IR20 11 XNpblSl 1.7 Yoshimura et al., 1995<br />
blight<br />
Xa-5 Bacterial IR1545-339 5 RG556 0.7 Blair <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> McCouch,<br />
blight RZ390 0.8 1997<br />
Xa-10 Bacterial IRBBIO 11 C^072oo[| 5.3 Yoshimura et al., 1995<br />
blight CD0365 16.2<br />
Xa-13 Bacterial IR66699-5-5-4-2 8 RZ28 4.8 Zh<strong>an</strong>g et al., 1996a<br />
blight RG136 3.7<br />
Xa-21 Bacterial 0. longistaminata 11 AB9 2.8 Williams et al., 1996<br />
blight RG103 0<br />
560 1.8<br />
Xa-22(t) Bacterial Zhach<strong>an</strong>glong 11 L190 0.8 Lin et al., 1998<br />
blight R1506 0<br />
G3132B 0.7<br />
Pi-1 Blast LAC23 11 RZ536 14.0 Yu et al., 1996<br />
Pi-2(t) Blast 5173 6 RG64 2.8 Yu ei a/., 1991<br />
Pi-4(t) Blast Tetep 12 RG869 15.3 Yu et al., 1991<br />
Pi-5(t) Blast Morobereken 4 RG498
Qifa Zh<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sibin Yu 245<br />
that exhibits a qualitatively compatible reaction with a fungal isolate<br />
may also provide some protection against the same isolate.<br />
Pertinent data were also obtained by Luo (1998) who studied BLB<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce of <strong>an</strong> RIL population from a cross between "Teqing", a<br />
cultivar from China <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> "Lemont", a cultivar from the United States.<br />
The population <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the parents were inoculated with three strains of the<br />
pathogen—CR4j, CR6 , <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CX08—<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lesion length was used as the<br />
measurement for level of infection. "Teqing" was qualitatively resist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
to CR4 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CX08 but susceptible to CR6 , while 'Xemont" was susceptible<br />
to all three strains. As expected, the Fj was resist<strong>an</strong>t to CR4 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
CX08 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> highly susceptible to CR6 .<br />
The lesion length caused by CR4 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CX08 each showed a bimodal<br />
distribution suggesting the involvement of major genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
although there was also considerable variation in lesion length within<br />
the resist<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> susceptible classes. On the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, lesion length<br />
caused by CR6 exhibited continuous distribution. Interestingly, tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive<br />
segregation was observed in both directions, arid a number of<br />
the RILs displayed a highly resist<strong>an</strong>t reaction. Moreover, mapping<br />
<strong>an</strong>alysis revealed a major gene for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to all three strains located<br />
on chromosome 11, which was inferred to be Xa4. This gene explained<br />
65.2, 55.2, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 52.1% of the total variation in lesion length caused by<br />
these three strains respectively. In all three cases, the allel from "Teqing"<br />
had a large effect in reducing the lesion length. The study also identified<br />
a number of QTLs for resist<strong>an</strong>ce, almost all of them located in close<br />
proximity to loci governing resist<strong>an</strong>ce to various diseases. Results from<br />
this study also strongly suggest that QTLs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> major genes are different<br />
alleles of the same loci, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> even major genes c<strong>an</strong> confer nonspecific<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce to the pathogen.<br />
Qu<strong>an</strong>titative resist<strong>an</strong>ce plays <strong>an</strong> import<strong>an</strong>t role in a system in which<br />
genes for qualitative resist<strong>an</strong>ce are not available. This is the case with<br />
the sheath blight disease caused by Rhizoctonia sol<strong>an</strong>i. Although shealth<br />
blight is one of the most serious diseases in m<strong>an</strong>y rice growing areas,<br />
major gene(s) conferring qualitative resist<strong>an</strong>ce has not been found despite<br />
extensive screening in both cultivated gene pools <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> among wild<br />
relatives. However, considerable variation exists among different varieties<br />
in the level of disease severity, which provides the basis for qu<strong>an</strong>titative<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce that confers a certain level of protection against R. sol<strong>an</strong>i<br />
under field conditions.<br />
Li et at. (1995b) conducted a QTL <strong>an</strong>alysis of qu<strong>an</strong>titative resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
to K. sol<strong>an</strong>i using a population of 255 F4 families from a cross between a<br />
susceptible variety "Lemont" <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a resist<strong>an</strong>t (partial resist<strong>an</strong>ce) variety<br />
"Teqing". The population was evaluated in two years with artificial
246 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
inoculation under field conditions. Analysis identified six QTLs contributing<br />
to R. sol<strong>an</strong>i resist<strong>an</strong>ce in this population. These six QTLs were<br />
located on six different chromosomes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> collectively explain approximately<br />
60% of the genotypic variation in this population. Analysis also<br />
showed that alleles from the resist<strong>an</strong>t parent at five of the QTLs contributed<br />
to reduced level of the disease infection^ but at one of the QTL, the<br />
allele from the susceptible parent produced <strong>an</strong> increase in resist<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />
Such a distribution of alleles conferring a resist<strong>an</strong>ce reaction from both<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> susceptible parents is very similar to that revealed by QTL<br />
<strong>an</strong>alysis of typical qu<strong>an</strong>titative traits.<br />
i ! E<br />
MAPPING AND GENETIC ANALYSIS OF INSECT RESISTANCE<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> is the host for a large number of insects. Yield losses due to damage<br />
by insects are severe in all rice-growing areas of the world. In addition to<br />
' the direct damage caused by feeding, some leaf insects, e.g. pl<strong>an</strong>thopper<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leaf hopper, are also vectors for viral diseases, leaf tr<strong>an</strong>smitting the<br />
pathogens while feeding on the pl<strong>an</strong>ts. A large number of studies on the<br />
inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of insect resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice (Khush <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Brar, 1991) have also<br />
identified a large number of varieties with resist<strong>an</strong>ce to the various<br />
insects.<br />
A number of studies in mapping genes for insect resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice<br />
have also been undertaken (Table 11.2). The gene conferring GLH<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce is located at the same position as the one specifying tungro<br />
spherical virus (TSV) resist<strong>an</strong>ce (Table 11.1). All the three genes for<br />
Table 11.2 Genes for pest resist<strong>an</strong>ce that have been tagged using molecular markers<br />
mu<br />
Gene Pest Source of<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
GLH<br />
B ph-l(t)<br />
Bph-W(t)<br />
Bph-?<br />
Gm2<br />
Gm4(t)<br />
Green<br />
leafhopper<br />
Brown<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>thopper<br />
Brown<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>thopper<br />
Brown<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>thopper<br />
Gall<br />
midge<br />
Gall<br />
midge<br />
Chromosome<br />
Closest<br />
markers<br />
Dist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
(cM)<br />
Reference<br />
ARC11554 4 RZ262 5.5 Sebasti<strong>an</strong> et a i, 1996<br />
IR28 12 XNpb248 Hirabayashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Ogawa, 1995<br />
0 . australiensis 12 RG457 3.68 Ishii et a i , 1994<br />
IR64 12 Sdh-1<br />
RG463<br />
Hu<strong>an</strong>g et al., 1997<br />
Phalguna 4 RG329 1.3 Moh<strong>an</strong> et a i, 1994<br />
ARC6650<br />
RG476 3.4<br />
Abhaya 8 ^^0570 Moh<strong>an</strong> et a i, 1997
Qifa Zh<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sibin Yu 247<br />
brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper resist<strong>an</strong>ce that were subjected to molecular marker<br />
mapping are mapped to chromosome 1 2 ; the identity for one of them<br />
need further characterization (Hu<strong>an</strong>g et ah, 1997). Another observation<br />
is that the precision of the mapping is not quite as good as in the cases of<br />
disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce; the linkages of the markers to the genes were not very<br />
tight <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> markers fl<strong>an</strong>king both sides were not available for most of the<br />
genes mapped. ThuS; more work is needed for identifying tightly linked<br />
markers for marker-assisted selection. More work should also be<br />
conducted for tagging other previously identified genes for insect<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />
A major difficulty in tagging insect resist<strong>an</strong>ce is the shortage of<br />
genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to a number of economically very import<strong>an</strong>t insects.<br />
For example, the yellow stem borer is one of the most damaging pests in<br />
m<strong>an</strong>y rice-growing areas of the world. However, genes for stem borer<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce are rare in the cultivated gene pools. Future efforts should be<br />
directed toward the identification of the germplasms for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />
this Insect; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> also to tr<strong>an</strong>sference of the genes into cultivated<br />
germplasm.<br />
MAPPING AND GENETIC ANALYSES OF GRAIN QUALITY<br />
Grain quality represents one of the major problems of rice production in<br />
m<strong>an</strong>y rice-producing areas of the world. There are m<strong>an</strong>y components<br />
contributing to rice quality; the most import<strong>an</strong>t components are probably<br />
cooking <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> eating qualities, which involve a number of physical<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chemical characteristics of the starch <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are also related to the<br />
appear<strong>an</strong>ce of the grains.<br />
The most import<strong>an</strong>t constituents of cooking <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> eating quality are<br />
amylose content, gelling temperature, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> gelling consistency. It has<br />
been determined that the waxy gene located on chromosome 6 plays a<br />
major role in controlling amylose content (W<strong>an</strong>g et ah, 1995; T<strong>an</strong> ef ah,<br />
1998). Tightly linked markers to this locus on both sides are available in<br />
the two high density maps (Causse et ah, 1994; Kurata et ah, 1994), It was<br />
also shown recently that gelling temperature <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> gelling consistency are<br />
likewise controlled by the waxy locus or closely linked chromosomal<br />
block (Table 11.3).<br />
The mo^t import<strong>an</strong>t trait for grain appear<strong>an</strong>ce is grain length, especially<br />
length-to-width ratio, which to some extent is related to cooking<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> eating quality, as this ratio is highly correlated with chalkiness of<br />
the endosperm. Grain length appeared to be inherited as a qu<strong>an</strong>titative<br />
trait in studies in which the grain length of the parents did not differ<br />
much; four to seven QTLs were identified in these studies (Hu<strong>an</strong>g et ah,
248 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
1997; Redona <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mackill/ 1998). However, a major gene effect was<br />
detected in a cross between two parents that showed a large difference<br />
in grain length (Table 11.3).<br />
Another import<strong>an</strong>t characteristic of cooking quality is the cookedgrain<br />
elongation. The study by Ahn et ah (1993) showed that a gene for<br />
this trait is located on chromosome 8 . Ahn et al, (1992) also showed that<br />
a gene for frag<strong>an</strong>ce of cooked rice is also located on chromosome 8 with<br />
a loose linkage to the locus for elongation.<br />
Table 11.3<br />
Major genes for grain quality that have been tagged using molecular markers<br />
Gene Trait Source Chromo- Closests Dist<strong>an</strong>ce Reference<br />
some markers (cM)<br />
Wx<br />
Gl<br />
fg r<br />
Amylase<br />
conter\t<br />
Minghui 63 6 Wx 0 W<strong>an</strong>g et al., 1995;<br />
T<strong>an</strong> et a i, 1998<br />
Gelling Minghui 63 6 Wx T<strong>an</strong> et a/,, 1998<br />
temperature<br />
¿elling Minghui 63 6 Wx T<strong>an</strong>af al., 1998<br />
consistency<br />
Grain length<br />
Aroma<br />
Minghui 63 3<br />
T<strong>an</strong> et al., 1998<br />
8 RG28 4.5 Ahn et a l, 1992<br />
Grain Basmati 370 8 RZ323 Ahn et al., 1993<br />
elongation<br />
RZ562<br />
MAPPING AND GENETIC ANALYSIS OF FERTILITY RELATED<br />
GENES<br />
Fertility Restoration of WA-CMS<br />
The most widely used cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) system in hybrid<br />
rice production is the wild-abortive (WA) CMS. It is estimated that<br />
hybrids developed by making use of the WA-CMS accounted for<br />
approximately 90% of the hybrids produced in China in the past. M<strong>an</strong>y<br />
studies demonstrated that two independent loci control fertility<br />
restoration in this system (Zhou, 1983; Young <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, 1984; Li <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Yu<strong>an</strong>, 1986). However, contradictory results have been obtained in the<br />
literature concerning the chromosomal locations of the two loci. The<br />
trisomic <strong>an</strong>alysis of Bharaj et al (1995) suggested that the two Rf loci<br />
were located on chromosomes 7 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 10. A molecular marker study by<br />
Zh<strong>an</strong>g et al (1997) based oh segregation populations from crosses between<br />
isogenic lines located one of the loci (R/3) on chromosome 1. A<br />
further study by Yao et al (1997), who searched for the Rf loci using<br />
RFLP markers covering the entire rice genome in <strong>an</strong> F2 population from<br />
a cross between the parents of the most widely used hybrid (Sh<strong>an</strong>you
Qífa Zh<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sibin Yu 249<br />
63)^ ''''Zhensh<strong>an</strong> 97A" <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ''Minghui 63"/ showed that the two loci were<br />
located on chromosomes 1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 10. The locus on chromosome 1 was<br />
located in the same region as R/3 determined by Zh<strong>an</strong>g ef at (1997). But<br />
the identity of the locus on chromosome 10 remained to be characterized,<br />
since there was evidence indicating that <strong>an</strong>other locus for fertility<br />
restoration of the BT CMS system, Rfl, was located in the nearby region<br />
on chromosome 10 (Ichikawa et at, 1997). Yao et at (1997) thus designated<br />
this locus as R/(u) in which "u" indicated uncharacterized identity.<br />
Markers closely linked to <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bracketing both Rf3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> R/(u) have<br />
been obtained (Table 11.4).<br />
P h o t o p e r io d -s e n s it iv e g e n ic m a l e s t e r il it y<br />
The photoperiod-sensitive genic male sterility (PSGMS) rice was found<br />
as a spont<strong>an</strong>eous mut<strong>an</strong>t from a late japónica variety Nongken 58 grown<br />
in Hubei Province, China. Numerous studies conducted in the past had<br />
established that this mut<strong>an</strong>t possesses a number of desirable<br />
characteristics that might be useful in hybrid rice: pollen fertility of this<br />
mut<strong>an</strong>t is regulated by photoperiod length; it is completely sterile when<br />
grown under long-day conditions, whereas pollen fertility varies when<br />
it is grown under short-day conditions. Studies have also demonstrated<br />
that the sterility is controlled by a relatively simple genetic system,<br />
usually one or two Mendeli<strong>an</strong> loci.<br />
However, the results from mapping studies appeared to be complicated.<br />
The study by Zh<strong>an</strong>g et at (1990), who attempted to map the<br />
gene(s) for PSGMS using a series of morphological markers, indicated<br />
that one of the loci segregating for male sterility in their mapping<br />
populations was located on chromosome 5, But in a molecular markerbased<br />
<strong>an</strong>alysis involving <strong>an</strong> indica PSGMS line, Zh<strong>an</strong>g et at (1994b)<br />
determined that the two loci segregating for male sterility in the population<br />
were located on chromosomes 3 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 7 respectively. They designated<br />
these two loci as pms2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pmsl according to the amount of effect<br />
that each locus had on fertility. Moreover, in molecular marker-based<br />
<strong>an</strong>alyses of two crosses using Nongken 58S as the PSGMS parent, Mei et<br />
at (1998a) also detected two loci segregating for sterility, one located on<br />
chromosome 7 that was the same as pmsl, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the other on chromosome<br />
12 {pms3). They (Mei et at, 1998b) further determined that pms3 was the<br />
locus on which the original PSGMS mutation occurred that ch<strong>an</strong>ged the<br />
cultivar Nongken 5S to the PSGMS rice Nongken 58S. Markers bracketing<br />
all three loci were identified although the dist<strong>an</strong>ce varied from one<br />
case to <strong>an</strong>other (Table 11.4).<br />
Further complications have arisen in the practice of <strong>breeding</strong> for new<br />
PSGMS lines, especially in indica genetic backgrounds. The two major<br />
difficulties encountered are instability of sterility in m<strong>an</strong>y newly bred
250 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
indica PSGMS lines, such that variable amounts of seed setting occur<br />
when the temperature fluctuates at certain stages of rice growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> development,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> low reversibility of other newly developed PSGMS lines.<br />
The sterility of these lines is highly stable but the lines c<strong>an</strong>not revert to<br />
normal fertility under short-day conditions. A molecular marker-based<br />
genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis revealed very complex genetic bases of the stability of<br />
sterility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reversibility to fertility, involving both multiple QTLs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
epistatic interactions between loci for the two phenomena (He etal, 1999).<br />
Thus, molecular markers may be particularly helpful for sorting out the<br />
desired genotypes in the <strong>breeding</strong> of PSGMS lines.<br />
ii<br />
Table 11.4<br />
Fertility related genes that have been tagged using molecular markers<br />
m II<br />
li It:<br />
Gene Trait* Source Chromosome<br />
Closest<br />
markers<br />
Dist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
(cM)<br />
Reference<br />
pmsl PSGMS 3<strong>2001</strong>S 7 RG477 0.5 Zh<strong>an</strong>g et aU, 1994;<br />
R1807 3.8 W<strong>an</strong>g, 1998<br />
pms2 PSGMS 3<strong>2001</strong>S 3 RG348 1 0 .6 Zh<strong>an</strong>g et aL, 1994<br />
RG191 7.0<br />
ptns3 PSGMS Nongken 58S 1 2 R2708 9.0 Mei et al, 1998b<br />
RZ261 5.5<br />
tmsl TGMS 5460S 8 RZ562 W<strong>an</strong>g et al., 1995<br />
RG978<br />
tms3(t) TGMS IR32364 6 OP AC6640 7.7 Subudhi et al., 1997<br />
TGMS OPAA7ij5o 1 0 .0<br />
Rfl FR(BT) MTCIOR 1 0 G2155 Ichikawa et al., 1997<br />
Rf3 FR(WA) IR24 1 RG532 2 .6 Zh<strong>an</strong>g effl/., 1997<br />
OPKOSgQQ 5.5 Yao et al, 1997<br />
Rf(u) FR(WA) Minghui 63 1 0 G4004 3.3 Yao et al., 1997<br />
C234 15.2<br />
S5 WC 02428 6 R2429 i.b Liu et al, 1997<br />
RZ450 13.4<br />
PSGMS, Photoperiod sensitive male sterility; TGMS, thermosensitive genic male sterility;<br />
FR, fertility restoration; WC, wide compatibility.<br />
T h e r m o s e n s it iv e g e n ic m a l e s t e r il it y<br />
Three TGMS mut<strong>an</strong>ts have been reported in the literature—5460S, H89-<br />
1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR32364TGMS—identified in China (Sun et ah, 1989), Jap<strong>an</strong><br />
(Maruyama et at., 1991), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IRRI (Virm<strong>an</strong>i <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Voc, 1991) respectively.<br />
All three TGMS mut<strong>an</strong>ts were obtained through irradiation<br />
mutagenesis.<br />
A common characteristic of the TGMS mut<strong>an</strong>ts is that their pollen<br />
fertility is regulated by temperature. They are male sterile under high<br />
temperature conditions but show partial to full fertility under low<br />
temperature conditions, although the temperature regime for fertility<br />
induction may not necessarily be the same for these TGMS mut<strong>an</strong>ts.<br />
Studies have also shown that, unlike the PSGMS rice, the
Qifa Zh<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sibin Yu 251<br />
thermosensitive male sterility of all three mut<strong>an</strong>ts is controlled in each<br />
by a single recessive gene (Mamyama et al, 1991; Y<strong>an</strong>g et al, 1992;<br />
Borkakati <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i^ 1996).<br />
Molecular marker <strong>an</strong>alyses were performed to determine the map<br />
locations of the TGMS genes in two of the mut<strong>an</strong>ts (W<strong>an</strong>g et al, 1995;<br />
Subudhi et al, 1997). In both cases^ the genes were tagged by RAPD<br />
<strong>an</strong>alysis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> indirectly mapped by converting the RAPD to RFLP<br />
markers.<br />
W id e c o m p a t ib il it y<br />
Wide compatibility .varieties (WCVs) are a special class of rice<br />
germplasm that is able to producé fertile hybrids whein crossed to both<br />
indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica rice (Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Arakh. 1984), while hybrids<br />
between indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica varieties usually show partial sterility<br />
(Kato et al, 1928). The discovery of WCVs brought breeders hope for<br />
breaking the fertility barrier between indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica subspecies <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
provided the possibility of exploiting the very strong heterosis<br />
demonstrated in intersubspecific crosses. Results from m<strong>an</strong>y studies<br />
(e.g. Ikehashi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki, 1986; Liu et al, 1992; Zheng et al, 1992;<br />
Y<strong>an</strong>agihara et al, 1995) indicated the existence of a gene for wide<br />
compatibility (WCG) at the S5 locus on chromosome 6 that was subsequently<br />
fine mapped by Liu et al (1997) using '02428' as the WCV parent<br />
(Table 11.4). Liu et al (1997) also detected the existence of two minor loci<br />
located on chromosomes 2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>; 1 2 whose joint effect could result in<br />
partial sterility even in the presence of the WCG.<br />
It has also been demonstrated that different WCVs differ in the<br />
genetic basis of wide compatibility. In a study using 'Dular', a variety<br />
from India with a very high level of wide compatibility, as the WCV<br />
parent, W<strong>an</strong>g et al (1998) identified five loci controlling fertility segregation<br />
in the population, located on chromosomes 1, 3, 5, 6 , <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 8 respectively.<br />
The locus on chromosome 6 corresponded to the S5 locus identified<br />
previously. But the locus showing the largest effect was the one on<br />
chromosome 5. They also identified two interactions involving two <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
three loci respectively, among the five loci in conditioning hybrid sterility,<br />
indicating a complex genetic basis of wide compatibility.<br />
MOLECULAR MARKER-BASED ANALYSES OF HETEROSIS<br />
Relationship between Molecular Marker Heterozygosity<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Heterosis<br />
One of the major efforts in molecular marker-based study of heterosis<br />
has been concentrated in the characterization of correlation between
252 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Hi<br />
molecular marker heterozygosity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hybrid perform<strong>an</strong>ce with the hope<br />
of finding a me<strong>an</strong>s for predicting hybrid perform<strong>an</strong>ce using molecular<br />
makers. A number of studies covering a wide r<strong>an</strong>ge of the cultivated<br />
rice germplasm have been conducted; almost all employed a diallel<br />
design in which the experimental lines were crossed in all possible nonreciprocal<br />
pairs. The parents were assayed using a large number of<br />
molecular markers covering the entire rice genome <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genotypes of the<br />
hybrids were deduced from the parental genotypes. All the hybrids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
parents were examined for agronomic perform<strong>an</strong>ce in replicated Held<br />
trails. Two statistics were adopted to provide measurements for<br />
heterozygosity of the F| genotypes^ general heterozygosity^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> specific<br />
heterozygosity. General heterozygosity measured the level of<br />
heterozygosity based on all markers included in a study <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> specific<br />
heterozygosity of a trait was based on markers that appeared to have<br />
signific<strong>an</strong>t effects on that trait detected using one-way vari<strong>an</strong>ce arialysis.<br />
Variable results were produced from these studies (Table 11.5). For<br />
example, in a study involving eight elite parental lines widely used in<br />
hybrid rice production in China, Zh<strong>an</strong>g et al (1994a, 1995) detected high<br />
correlations between specific heterozygosity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> heterosis for yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
yield component traits. However, using essentially the same set of<br />
molecular markers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the same <strong>an</strong>alysis, much lower correlations were<br />
observed in the studies of a set of indica varieties <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a set of japónica<br />
varieties with a broad r<strong>an</strong>ge of representations, including parents of<br />
hybrid rice, modern elite cultivars, primitive cultivars <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> races<br />
from several countries (Zh<strong>an</strong>g et al, 1996b). On the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, very few<br />
correlations were detected in the study involving intersubspecific<br />
crosses making use of the wide compatibility gene (Zhao et al., 1998).<br />
Thus, clearly, the correlations between genotype heterozygosity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
hybrid perform<strong>an</strong>ce were highly variable depending on the genetic<br />
material used in the studies.<br />
Genetic Basis of Heterosis<br />
There have been two major studies in rice investigating the genetic basis<br />
of heterosis. The study of Xiao et al (1995) involved the use of <strong>an</strong> F^<br />
population of 194 recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred lines derived from a cross<br />
between <strong>an</strong> indica line "9024" <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a japónica variety "Lunhui 422". The<br />
RILs were backcrossed to both parents, resulting in a total of 388 BCiFy<br />
lines. All the BC lines, the RILs, the parents <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the were examined<br />
for perform<strong>an</strong>ce of 12 qu<strong>an</strong>titative traits in a replicated field trial, A total<br />
of 37 QTLs were detected at LOD threshold 2.0 in the BC1F7 populations.<br />
Twenty-seven of the QTLs were detected in only one of the two BC<br />
populations; the heterozygotes were superior to the respective
Qifa Zh<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sibin Yu 253<br />
homozygotes in 82% of the cases. The remaining ten QTLs were detected<br />
in both BC populations <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the heterozygotes had phenotypes falling<br />
between the two homozygotes. The authors concluded that domin<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
is the major genetic basis of heterosis in this population.<br />
Table 11.5<br />
Correlations between heterozygosity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hybrid perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
in various genetic materials <strong>an</strong>alyzed<br />
Tillers/pl<strong>an</strong>t Grains/p<strong>an</strong>icle Grain weight Yield<br />
Parents of elite hybrids (Zh<strong>an</strong>g et ni., 1995)<br />
Perform<strong>an</strong>ce 0.13/0.10 .0.13/0.18 , 0.53**/0.70** 0.36/0.48**<br />
Heterosis 0.49’^V0.35 0.54**/0.71 0.30/0.25 0.56**/0.77**<br />
Indica mixture (Zh<strong>an</strong>g et al., 1996b)<br />
Perform<strong>an</strong>ce -0.14/0.27 0.47**/0.57** 0.37*/0.61** 0.43**/0.44**<br />
Heterosis 0.17/0.30 0.24/0.32 0.14/0.54** 0.34**/0.45**<br />
Japónica mixture (Zh<strong>an</strong>g et aL, 1996b)<br />
Perform<strong>an</strong>ce 0.12/0.52** 0.42*»/0.68** -0.08/0.26 0.48**/0.59**<br />
Heterosis 0.17/-0.03 0.12/0.13 -0.04/-0.05 0.17/0.09<br />
Inlersubspecific crosses (Zhaoef al., 1998)<br />
Indica x indica<br />
Perform<strong>an</strong>ce -0.55/-0.36 0.44/0.84** 0.25/0.10 0.20/0.26<br />
Heterosis 0.11/-0.16 0.22/Û.33 0.49/0.32 0.37/0.33<br />
Japónica X japónica<br />
Perform<strong>an</strong>ce 0.28/0.51* -0.15/-0.56* 0.18/0.54* 0.43/0.65**<br />
Heterosis 0.10/0.15 0.02/-0.23 0.03/24 0.41/52*<br />
Indica x japónica<br />
Perform<strong>an</strong>ce -0.05/-0.21 0.19/0.29 -0.08/-0.12 0.20/0.32<br />
Heterosis 0.27/0.00 0.10/0.27 0.18/-0.08 0.24/-0.11<br />
** signific<strong>an</strong>t at 0.05 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 0.01 probability levels respectively. Calculation on general<br />
he lerozygosity/ specific he terozygosity.<br />
I I!<br />
In <strong>an</strong>other study^ Yu et al (1997) investigated the genetic basis of<br />
heterosis of a cross between the parents of <strong>an</strong> elite rice hybrid, sh<strong>an</strong>you<br />
63, the most widely grown hybrid in rice production in China. Data for<br />
yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> three traits that were components of yield were collected over<br />
two years from replicated field trials of 250 F2 :3 families from this cross.<br />
Subst<strong>an</strong>tial heterosis still existed in the F 3 families for yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grains<br />
per p<strong>an</strong>icle. A total of 32 QTLs were detected at LOD 3.0 for the four<br />
traits using 150 segregating marker loci covering the entire rice genome.<br />
Twelve of the QTLs were observed in both years <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the remaining 20<br />
were detected in only one year. Overdomin<strong>an</strong>ce was observed for most<br />
of the QTLs for yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> also for a few QTLs for the component traits.<br />
The most striking feature is the observation of frequent <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> widespread<br />
occurrence of digenic interactions in this population, including additive<br />
by additive, additive by domin<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> domin<strong>an</strong>ce by domin<strong>an</strong>ce types<br />
of interactions. The interactions involved large numbers of marker loci.
254 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
most of which were not detectable on a single locus basis. The authors<br />
concluded that epistasis plays <strong>an</strong> import<strong>an</strong>t role both in the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
of qu<strong>an</strong>titative traits <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> as the genetic basis of heterosis.<br />
There may be m<strong>an</strong>y reasons for the disagreement between the two<br />
studies in the conclusions regarding the genetic basis of heterosis^ such<br />
as the types of genetic materials used in the studies <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the levels of<br />
heterosis of the crosses. However, the results from both studies clearly<br />
demonstrate that molecular markers, hence genome mapping, have<br />
provided efficient tools for dissecting the genetic basis of heterosis.<br />
ilHi<br />
MAPPING AND GENETIC ANALYSES OF GENES FOR<br />
AGRONOMIC TRAITS<br />
Numerous studies have been conducted on mapping genes of agronomic<br />
traits. Traits studied include those extensively investigated in<br />
<strong>breeding</strong> programs such as yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yield component traits, pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
height <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> heading date, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> those not frequently examined in conventional<br />
genetic <strong>an</strong>alyses, such as root morphology, seedling vigor <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
stress toler<strong>an</strong>ce which are related to agronomic perform<strong>an</strong>ce. These<br />
studies demonstrated that most of the traits are qu<strong>an</strong>titatively irrherited<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the genes are thus mostly QTLs.<br />
Yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yield Component Traits<br />
Studies are increasing on mapping QTLs for yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> three other traits,<br />
including tillers per pl<strong>an</strong>t, grains per p<strong>an</strong>icle <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grain weight, that are<br />
components of yield. Figure 11.1 summarizes the results from seven<br />
studies involving eight populations conducted in recent years. A total of<br />
69 QTLs were detected including 16 for yield, 19 for grains per p<strong>an</strong>icle, 9<br />
for tillers per pl<strong>an</strong>t, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 25 for grain weight. Ten of the QTLs were<br />
shared in two or more populations, including one for yield, one for<br />
grains per p<strong>an</strong>icle, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> eight for grain weight. The remaining QTLs were<br />
found in only one of the populations. It is also clear from Figure 11.1 that<br />
some of the chromosomal regions are much more active th<strong>an</strong> others in<br />
controlling the expression of QTLs; such QTL-active regions appeared<br />
to be concentrated on chromosomes 1, 2, 4, 5, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 8 . In contrast, some<br />
chromosomes, especially chromosomes 9 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 12, did not seem to have<br />
very much effect on yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yield component traits. Such concentrated<br />
distribution of the QTLs for yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yield component traits may have<br />
import<strong>an</strong>t implications in rice-<strong>breeding</strong> programs.
7 7 7<br />
Qifa Zh<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sibin Yu 255<br />
2<br />
RG324<br />
CDO507<br />
Fig. 11.1<br />
iContd)
256 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenge
Qifa Zh<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sibin Yu 257<br />
6<br />
1ÍZ39Ü<br />
C263<br />
R830<br />
CDO580<br />
BGL760<br />
RG360<br />
CÍ19<br />
R223?<br />
RG671<br />
C1003X<br />
R565<br />
C952<br />
C1084X<br />
R1952<br />
C226a<br />
RZ398<br />
RZ450<br />
RZ588<br />
CD0226<br />
RZ945<br />
R1436<br />
C1239X<br />
CDO105*<br />
RG13<br />
R1553<br />
CD0345<br />
G1314a<br />
R594<br />
C43<br />
CD089<br />
C1402<br />
RG470X<br />
RZ70<br />
C246<br />
RG697X<br />
R1714<br />
RG435<br />
RG1I9<br />
CD054<br />
Fig. 11.1<br />
(Cotttrf)<br />
RG213<br />
R2147, G200<br />
R2I71<br />
CD0544<br />
RG653<br />
RZ405<br />
G342
258 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
7 8<br />
C1017<br />
RZ143<br />
C390<br />
R1010<br />
R2285<br />
C1121<br />
R1813<br />
RG1034<br />
RG978
— n<br />
Qifa Zh<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sibin Yu 259<br />
10<br />
-R C701<br />
•R1933<br />
C148<br />
R1629X<br />
I RZ920<br />
RZ561<br />
C1286<br />
2b<br />
1 1 .<br />
R2825<br />
CD098<br />
R1877<br />
C1361<br />
CDO250<br />
CD094*<br />
C488<br />
RG 134<br />
C16<br />
C809<br />
■RZ421<br />
•C223<br />
■C405*<br />
I centromeric region 1 yield grains/p<strong>an</strong>icle<br />
M tillers/pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
Il 1000-seed weight<br />
Fig. 11.1<br />
(Contd)
260 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
n 12<br />
7 7<br />
R Z 5 2 5<br />
" C 3 6 2 X<br />
:i04X<br />
Cl 116a<br />
■R2918X<br />
■C794<br />
•RG118<br />
■G320<br />
■ R G 1 0 9 4<br />
I ------RGI67<br />
'^G257<br />
‘RG16<br />
^RG2<br />
' CD0534<br />
■C1172<br />
■ C 5 0 b<br />
G1CI3<br />
■ G 1 4 6 5<br />
■ C 9 5 0<br />
■ G 1 8 1<br />
" R Z 5 3 6<br />
•C104X<br />
•RG574X<br />
RZ103X<br />
•R2918X<br />
RZ257<br />
' R2672X<br />
R367<br />
' ABC 45 4<br />
R3375<br />
■R1869<br />
RG341<br />
' R887X<br />
■RG9<br />
' RG457<br />
C751a<br />
■RG413*<br />
“ ■ ^ R' R2708 2<br />
^ 'reD 0344*<br />
\ y R G 5 4 3<br />
\ V r G 4 6 3 , R G 9 0 1<br />
X I 069<br />
" W g958<br />
J ^ 9 9 6<br />
\ R 1 6 8 4<br />
\ g181<br />
Fig. 11.1 pisWbuiionofqu<strong>an</strong>liealivetraiilocl(QTU)lbryield<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>(heirthreecomponent<br />
ttmts idmti fied in eight popuiations of rice. The most iikeiy positions of the QTLs<br />
( UD > 2.4) for the four traits are placed on the map of Xiong et a i (1998a) that<br />
integrated markers from the maps of Causse et ul. (1994) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kurata et al., (1994).<br />
of each bar represents the population used for QTL detection;<br />
l-z55^ ^2:4 lines from the Lemont/Teqing cross (Li et al., 1997); 2a--171 F,<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts from Waiyin 2/CB (Lin et al,<br />
AoiT c ^ r ^ ooobied haploid lines from Zhaiyeqing/Jingxi 17 (Lu et al, 1996);<br />
4-231 F2 pl<strong>an</strong>ts from Palaw<strong>an</strong>/IR 42 (Wu et al, 1996); 5-194 recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred<br />
lines from 9024/LH422 (Xiaoef al, 1996a); 6-300 BC2 testcross families of V20/O.<br />
ra/ipo^oii/Ce64 (Xiao ei al, 1996b); 7-250 F2.3 lines from Zhensh<strong>an</strong> 97/Minghui<br />
63 (Yu c?f al, 1997).
Qifa Zh<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sibin Yu 261<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>t Height<br />
Two genes for semidwarfism, sdl <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sdg^ were mapped to chromosomes<br />
1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 5 respectively (Cho et at, 1994; Li<strong>an</strong>g ei al, 1994). Eleven<br />
dwarfing genes were identified <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mapped to various chromosomal<br />
locations (Table 11.6). A number of QTLs were also detected for this trait<br />
which involved all 12 rice chromosomes (Lu et al, 1996; Xiao et al,<br />
1996a; Hu<strong>an</strong>g et al., 1996; Zhu<strong>an</strong>g et al, 1997).<br />
To gain insights into the nature of the major genes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> QTLs controlling<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t height, Hu<strong>an</strong>g et al (1996) studied the genetic effects of the<br />
loci contributing to pl<strong>an</strong>t height usirig five mapping populations. The<br />
difference in height between the two parents was large for all the<br />
populations, presumably due to the existence of major genes for either<br />
dwarfism or semidwarfism. Analysis detected a total of 23 QTLs with<br />
eight of them shared by at least two of the five populations. A very<br />
interesting feature revealed by this <strong>an</strong>alysis is that, for each of the<br />
previously identified dwarfing or semidwarfing genes, at least one QTL<br />
mapped to its close proximity. The authors interpreted such positional<br />
correspondence between the QTLs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> major genes for pl<strong>an</strong>t height as<br />
evidence for supporting the hypothesis that QTLs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> major genes are<br />
different alleles of the same loci.<br />
Heading Date<br />
Heading date in rice is mainly determined by two factors—duration of<br />
basic vegetative growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> photoperiod sensitivity—;cach of which is<br />
Table 11.6<br />
Major gene loci for pl<strong>an</strong>t height <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> heading date that were directly or<br />
indirectly tagged using molecular markers<br />
I<br />
Gene Chromosome Linked marker Reference<br />
sdl 1 RZ730-RG690 Adapted from Hu<strong>an</strong>g et al., 1997<br />
dlO 1 RG345~RZ276<br />
dl8 1 RG472<br />
dS 2 RG654-RG256-RG95<br />
d32 2 RZ318-RG157<br />
d30 2 RG157-RG171<br />
d56 3 RG104-RG144<br />
d31 4 RZ590-RG214<br />
d ll 4 RG163 (or RG218)<br />
sdg 5 RG403-RG13-CD0105<br />
d9 6 RG648-RG424<br />
d27 11 RG103<br />
d33 12 RG463-RG457<br />
Hdl 6 R1679 Y<strong>an</strong>o et«/., 1997<br />
Hd8 8 RG333-C1121 Lu et al., 1996; Xiong et al,, 1998b
262 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
controlled by several genes (Kinoshita^ 1995). One of thé major genes for<br />
photoperiod sensitivity, Sel, located on chromosome 6 was tagged'by<br />
Mackill et al. (1993), which was further resolved by Y<strong>an</strong>o et al. (1997)<br />
using QTL <strong>an</strong>alysis as explaining 67% of the total phenotypic variation.<br />
This locus was located on top of the marker locus R1679 in the map of<br />
Kurata et al. (1994), Scrutiny of the published QTL <strong>an</strong>alyses (Li et al,<br />
1995a; Lu et aï-, 1996; Xiao et ai, 1996a; Xiong ef al, 1998) also indicated<br />
the existence of a locus on chromosome 8 that had a major effect on<br />
heading date by explaining from 33% to 52% of the phenotypic variation.<br />
This is likely to be <strong>an</strong>other locus for photoperiod sensitivity. In addition,<br />
a number of QTLs with minor effects pn heading date were also detected<br />
in various studies were which involved chromosomes 1, 3, 6 , 7, 8 , 10,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 1 1 .<br />
Root Morphology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Stress Toler<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Several studies have been conducted in QTL mapping of root morphology<br />
in the context of drought toler<strong>an</strong>ce (Table 11.7). Very large<br />
numbers of QTLs were detected for some of the traits, which indicated<br />
that the genetic basis for root morphology is complex. A comparison of<br />
the results obtained from two different populations (Ghampoux ei al,<br />
1995 vs. Yadav et al, 1997) showed that 1 to 3 of the QTLs for the various<br />
traits could be repeatedly detected. However, none of the QTLs<br />
exhibited a major effect.<br />
Table 11,7 Summary of the QTLs detected for root morphology traits<br />
Trait Number Method Statistical Vari<strong>an</strong>ce Reference<br />
of QTLs of threshold explained<br />
detected <strong>an</strong>alysis* (%)<br />
Total root number 19 M/Q LOD4.1 8-15 Ray ei al, 1996<br />
Penetrated roots 4 M/Q LOD3.2 6 -8<br />
Root penetration 6 M/Q LOD3.9 7-13<br />
index<br />
Total root weight 6 ANOVA P
Qifa Zh<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sibin Yu 263<br />
Some studies mapping genes for toler<strong>an</strong>ce to abiotic stress including<br />
submerging <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ferrous iron toxicity (Table 11.8) have been done. A<br />
major gene locus, Subl, was identified for submerging toler<strong>an</strong>ce (Xu <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Mackill, 1996). One of the loci detected for ferrous iron toxicity toler<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
also appeared to have a large effect as it explained 32% of the variation<br />
in leaf bronzing (Wu et at, 1997).<br />
Table 11.8<br />
Stress toler<strong>an</strong>ce genes that have been tagged by molecular markers<br />
Subi<br />
Gene Trait Source Chromosome<br />
Submerging<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Ferrou<br />
toxicity<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Closest<br />
markers<br />
FA13-A 9 C1232<br />
RZ698<br />
Azucena 1 RG345-<br />
RG381<br />
Dist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
(cM)<br />
Reference<br />
4 XÙ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mackill,<br />
1996<br />
2.3 Wueffl/,, 1997<br />
PERSPECTIVE<br />
Tlie results of the extensive studies in tagging <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic <strong>an</strong>alyses of<br />
genes will have signific<strong>an</strong>t impacts on rice genetic improvement.<br />
Marker-assisted Selection<br />
Recently, molecular marker-assisted selection has been successfully applied<br />
in rice-<strong>breeding</strong> programs. For example, Hu<strong>an</strong>g et al. (1997) used<br />
marker-assisted selection to pyramid multiple genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />
BLB, which increased both the spectrum <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> level of resist<strong>an</strong>ce of the<br />
result<strong>an</strong>t lines. Chen et aL (1998) developed a new version of Minghui<br />
63, the best restorer line in Chinese hybrid rice production, by precise<br />
replacement of the Xa21 containing region. The improved version contained<br />
only a fragment of less th<strong>an</strong> 4.0 cM (0.35%) surrounding the Xa21<br />
locus from the donor parent with the remainder (>99.65%) of the genome<br />
from the recipient. Such a precise replacement may be very Import<strong>an</strong>t<br />
for maintaining the combining ability of the restorer line.<br />
It is expected that molecular marker-assisted selection will have a<br />
major role to play in future in genetic improvement of crops, including<br />
rice. This is not only because the technique itself has provided a highly<br />
efficient tool for speedy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> precise selection, but also because it<br />
possesses several adv<strong>an</strong>tages compared to genetic tr<strong>an</strong>sformation. First,<br />
it does not require isolation of the targeted gene, which often takes years<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> considerable resources to accomplish. Second, most of the gene<br />
constructs, such as those commonly used in m<strong>an</strong>y tr<strong>an</strong>sformation
264 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
studies, are now covered by intellectual property rights <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hence are<br />
not freely available for varietal development. Third, the progeny developed<br />
by marker-assisted selection in general does not suffer from the<br />
adverse effects such as over- or underexpression, tr<strong>an</strong>sgene silencing<br />
etc., which are now frequently reported with tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Thus the<br />
perform<strong>an</strong>ce of the progeny resulting from marker-assisted selection is<br />
much more predictable th<strong>an</strong> that from tr<strong>an</strong>sformation. The large number<br />
of genes that have been precisely tagged <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mapped will therefore<br />
provide a rich source for marker-assisted <strong>breeding</strong>.<br />
Gene Isolation<br />
11<br />
I<br />
Currently, the most common practice for obtaining new genes is mapbased<br />
cloning. Molecular markers that are closely linked to genes of<br />
interest c<strong>an</strong> serve as the starting points for cloning the genes following<br />
the map-based cloning approach. Using this approach, several import<strong>an</strong>t<br />
genes have now been isolated in rice, including two genes for BLB<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce (Song et ah, 1995; Yoshimura et ah, 1998) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one gene for<br />
blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce (W<strong>an</strong>ge et ah, 1998). It is also known that molecular<br />
cloning of a number of genes is in progress (e.g., Lin et al., 1998; Lu et aL,<br />
1998). It c<strong>an</strong> be expected that the process of gene isolation using this<br />
approach will be greatly accelerated with the adv<strong>an</strong>ces of the<br />
international effort in sequencing the entire rice genome, which<br />
supposedly will be completed in the next 5 to 10 years. It is highly likely<br />
that all the genes that are accurately mapped with closely linked markers<br />
could be quickly isolated with the availability of the sequence<br />
information.<br />
Recent developments in DNA-chip technologies may also provide a<br />
powerful tool for large-scale isolation of new gens in the near future<br />
(Lemieux et al., 1998). It c<strong>an</strong> be expected that large numbers of genes will<br />
become available for rice improvement in the next decade.<br />
Germplasm Enh<strong>an</strong>cement<br />
Wild relatives have for long been recognized as import<strong>an</strong>t gene pools for<br />
qualitatively inherited resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>/or toler<strong>an</strong>ce to biotic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> abiotic<br />
stress. Recent studies using molecular markers have demonstrated that<br />
wild relatives may also be import<strong>an</strong>t sources of useful genes for<br />
agronomic perform<strong>an</strong>ce including yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yield component traits. For<br />
example, Xiao et al. (1996b) reported two QTLs from a wild rice that<br />
showed large effects in increasing the perform<strong>an</strong>ce of <strong>an</strong> elite rice<br />
hybrid. Such a finding has generated considerable interest in identifying
I—^<br />
Qifa Zh<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sibin Yu 265<br />
genes for agronomic perform<strong>an</strong>ce from wild relatives that are potentially<br />
useful for varietal improvement. Indeed, in several studies, DNA<br />
segments from wild relatives have been reported to have signific<strong>an</strong>t<br />
effects on yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yield component traits in the genetic backgrounds of<br />
cultivars, which were referred as wild QTLs. Such wild QTLs may be<br />
potentially rich source of genes of agronomic import<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />
In summary, recent developments in genome mapping <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic<br />
engineering have provided a knowledge base, identified germplasm<br />
resources, provided useful genes, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> offered effective tools for rice<br />
improvement. Integration of this knowledge <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the genetic resources<br />
into <strong>breeding</strong> programs will greatly increase the efficiency of varietal<br />
development.<br />
References<br />
Ahn, S.N., Bollich, C.N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D. 1992. RFLP tagging of a gene for aroma in rice<br />
Theor. Appl 84: 825-828.<br />
Ahn, S.N., Bollich, C.N., McClung, A.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D. 1993. RFLP <strong>an</strong>alysis of genomic<br />
regions associated with cooked-kernel elongation in rice.Theor. Appl. Gen. 87:27-32.<br />
Bharaj, T.S., Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S. S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S, 1995, Chromosomal location of fertility restoring<br />
genes or 'wild abortive' cytoplasmic male sterility using primary trisomiqs in rice.<br />
Euphytica 83:169-173.<br />
Blair, M.W. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> McCouch, S.R. 1997. Microsatellite <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sequence-tagged site markers diagnostic<br />
for the rice bacterial leaf blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce genexa-5. Theor. Appl. Gen. 95:174-184.<br />
Borkakati, R.P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S. S. 1996. Genetics of thermosensitive male sterility in rice.<br />
Euphytica 8 8 :1-7.<br />
Causse, M.A., Fulton, T.M., Gho, Y.G., Ahn, S. N., Chunwongse, J., Wu, K.S., Xiao, J.H., Yu,<br />
Z.H., Ronald, P.C., Harrington, S.E., Second, G., McCouch, S.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D. 1994.<br />
Saturated molecular ihap of the rice genome based on <strong>an</strong> interspecific backcross population.<br />
Genetics 138:1251-1274.<br />
Champoux, M.C., W<strong>an</strong>g, G,, Sarkarung, S., Mackill, D.J., O'Toole, J.C,, Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
McCouch, S.R, 1995. Locating genes associated with root morphology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> drought<br />
avoid<strong>an</strong>ce in rice via linkage to molecular markers. Theor. Appl. Gen. 90:969-981.<br />
Chen, S., Lin, X., Xu, C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q. 1998. Marker—assisted selection to improve bacteria<br />
blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce of Minghui 63, <strong>an</strong> elite restorer of hybrid rice. Abstracts. 18th Inti. Gen.<br />
Cong. 10-15 August 1998, Beijing, p. 158.<br />
Cho, Y.G., Bun, M.Y., McCouch, S.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chae, Y.A. 1994. The semidwarf gene, sd~l, of rice<br />
{Oryza sativa L,), II, Molecular mapping <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> marker-assisted selection, Theor. Appl. Gen.<br />
89: 54-59.<br />
Hay<strong>an</strong>o-Saito, Y., Tsuji, T., Fujii, K., Sai to, K., Iwasaki, M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sai to, A. 1998. Localization of<br />
the rice stripe disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene, $tv-h', by graphical genotyping <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> linkage <strong>an</strong>alysis<br />
with molecular markers, Theor, Appl. Gen. 96:1044-1049.<br />
He, Y., Y<strong>an</strong>g, J., Xu, C., Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Z. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q. 1999. Genetic bases of instability of male<br />
sterility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fertility reversibility in photoperiod sensitive genic male sterile rice. Theor,<br />
Appl. Gen. in press.<br />
Hirabayashi, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ogawa, T. 1995. RFLP mapping of Bph-1 (brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
gene) in rice. Breed. Sci. 45:367-^91.
'i I<br />
266 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N., Courtois, B,, Khush, G.S., Lin, H.X., W<strong>an</strong>g, G,, Wu, P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zheng, K. 1996'.<br />
Association of qu<strong>an</strong>titative trait loci for pl<strong>an</strong>t height with major dwarfing genes in rice.<br />
Heredity 77: 130-137,<br />
Hü<strong>an</strong>g, N., Angeles, E.R., Domingo,]., Magp<strong>an</strong>tay, G., Singh, S,, Zh<strong>an</strong>g, G., Kumaravadivel,<br />
N., Bennett, J, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1997. Pyramiding of bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes in<br />
rice: marker-assisted selection using RFLP <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> PCR. Theor. AppL Gen. 95:313-320,<br />
Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N,, Parco, A., Mew, T., Magp<strong>an</strong>tay, G., McCouch, S.R., Guiderdoni, E., Xu, J.,<br />
: Subudhi, P., Angeles, E,R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S, 1997, RFLP mapping of isozymes, RAPD <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
QTLs for grain shape, brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper resist<strong>an</strong>ce in a doubled haploid rice population,<br />
Moke. Breed 3; 105-113,<br />
Ichikawa, N., Kishimoto, N., Inagaki, A., Nakamura, A,, Koshino, Y., Yokozeki, Y., Oka, M.,<br />
S'amoto, S., Akagi, H., Higo, K., Shiniyo, C., Fujimura, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shimada, H. 1997. A rapid<br />
PCR-aided selection of a rice line containing the Rf-1 gene which is involved in restoration<br />
of the cytoplasmic male sterility. Moke, Breed. 3:195-202,<br />
Ikehashi, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki, H. 1984. Variety screening of compatibility types revealed in Fj<br />
fertility of dist<strong>an</strong>t crosses In rice. Jap. /, Breed. 34:304-^13,<br />
Ikehashi, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Araki, H. 1986. Genetics of F^ sterility in remote crosses of rice. In: <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genetics. Symp, 27-31 May 1985. IRRI M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp, 119-130.<br />
Inukai, T., Nélson, R.J., Zeigler, R.S., Sarkarung, S., Mackill, D.J., Bonm<strong>an</strong>, J.M., Takamure, I.<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kinoshita, T. 1994. Allelism of blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes in near-isogenic lines of rice.<br />
Phytopath. 84: 1278-1283.<br />
Ishii, T., Brar, D.S., Mult<strong>an</strong>i, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1994. Molecular tagging of genes for brown<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>thopper resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> earliness introgressed from Oryza australiensis into cultivated<br />
rice, O, sativa. Genome 37: 217-221.<br />
Kato, S., Kosaka, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kara, S. 1928. On the affinity of rice varieties as shown by fertility of<br />
hybrid pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Bull Set, fac. Agríe, Kyushu Univ. 3; 132-147.<br />
Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Brar, D.S. 1991. Genetics of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to insects in crop pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Adv. Agron.<br />
‘ 45: 223-264.<br />
Kinoshita, T. 1995. Report of commitee on gene symbolization, nomenclature <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> linkage<br />
groups. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newslett. 12; 9-153.<br />
Kurata^ N., Nagamura, Y., Yamamoto, K., Harushima, Y., Sue, N., Wu, J., Antonio, B.A.,<br />
ShomUra, A., Shimizu, T., Lin, S.Y., Inoue, T,, Fukuda, A., Shim<strong>an</strong>o, T., Kuboki, Y.,<br />
Toyama, T., Miyamoto, Y., Kirihara, T., Hayasaka, K., Miyao, A., Monna, L,, Zhong, H.S.,<br />
Tamura, Y., W<strong>an</strong>g, Z.X., Momma, T., Umehara, Y., Y<strong>an</strong>a, M., Sasaki, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Minobe, Y.<br />
1994. A 300 kilobase interval genetic map of rice including 883 expressed sequences.<br />
Nature Gen. 8 ; 365-372.<br />
Lemieux, B,, Aharoni, A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sehena, M. 1998. Overview of DNA chip technology. Molec,<br />
. Breed. 4: 277-289.<br />
Li, Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yu<strong>an</strong>, L. 1986. Genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis of fertility restoration in male sterile lines of rice.<br />
In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 617-632.<br />
Li, Z.K., Pinson, S.R.M., St<strong>an</strong>sel, J.W. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Park, W.D. 1995a. Identification of two major genes<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> qu<strong>an</strong>titative trait loci (QTLs) for heading date <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>t height in cultivated rice<br />
’ (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. AppL Gen. 91:374-381.<br />
Li, Z.K., Pinson, S.R.M., Marchetti, M.A., St<strong>an</strong>sel, J.W. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Park, W.D. 1995b. Characterization<br />
of qu<strong>an</strong>titative trait loci (QTLs) in cultivated rice contributing to field resist<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />
. sheath blight (Rhizoctonia sol<strong>an</strong>i). Theor. AppL Gen. 91:382-388.<br />
Li, Z.K., Pinson, S.R.M., Park, W.D., Paterson, A.H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> St<strong>an</strong>sel, J.W. 1997. Epistasisfor three<br />
grain yield components in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genetics 145:453-465.<br />
Li<strong>an</strong>g, C., Gu, M., P<strong>an</strong>, X., Li<strong>an</strong>g, G. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zhu, L, 1994. RFLP tagging of a new semidwarfing<br />
gene in rice. Theor. AppL Gen. 88:898-900.
Qifa Zh<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sib’in Yu 267<br />
■'4<br />
Lin, H., Qi<strong>an</strong>, H., Zhu<strong>an</strong>g, J., Lu, J., Min, S., Xiong, Z., Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zheng, K. 1996 a. RFLP<br />
mapping of QTLs for yield <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> related characters in rice {Oryza sativa L.). Theor, Appl.<br />
Gen. 92: 920-927.<br />
Lin, X., Zh<strong>an</strong>g, D., Xie, Y,, Gao, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q. 1996b. Identification <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mapping a new<br />
gene for bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice based on RFLP markers. Phytopath. 86:1156-<br />
,1159.<br />
Lin, X., W<strong>an</strong>g, C., Xu, X., Wen, G., Zh<strong>an</strong>g, D., Xie, Y., Peng, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q. 1998. Progresses<br />
in map-based cloning of Xfl22{t), a new gene for bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice.<br />
Abstracts 18th Gen. Cong. 10-15 August 1998, Beijing, p. 196.<br />
Liu, A., Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Li, H. 1992. Location of a gene for wide-compatibility in the RFLP<br />
linkage map. <strong>Rice</strong> Gent. Newslett. 9; 134-136.<br />
Liu, K., W<strong>an</strong>g, J., Li, H., Xu, C., Liu, A., Li, X. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q, 1997. A genome-wide <strong>an</strong>alysis of<br />
wide compatibility in rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the precise location of the locus in the molecular map.<br />
Theor. Appl. Gen. 95:809-814.<br />
Lu, C., Shen, L., T<strong>an</strong>, Z., Xu, Y., He, P., Chen, Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zhu, L. 1996. Comparative mapping of<br />
QTLs for agronomic traits of rice across environments using a doubled haploid<br />
population. Theor. Appl. Gene. 93:1211-1217.<br />
Lu, C., Zhai, W., Gong, F,, Li, X., Ti<strong>an</strong>, W-, Zhou, Y., Y<strong>an</strong>g, M., Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q., Bennetzen, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Zhu, 1*. 1998. Molecular cloning of a R gene homologous sequence linked to the rice<br />
bacterial blight disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene, Xh7. Abstracts 18th Gen. Cong. 10-15 August<br />
1998, Beijing, p. 39.<br />
Luo, L. 1998. Developing high yield hybrids, probing the genetic basis of heterosis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice. Ph. D. Diss., Huazhong Agricultural Univ.<br />
Mackill, D.J., Salam, M.A., W<strong>an</strong>g, Z.Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D. 1993. A major photoperiodsensitive<br />
gene tagged with RFLP <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> isozyme markers in rice. Theor. Appl. Gen. 85:536-<br />
540.<br />
Maruyama, K., Araki, H, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> kiato, H, 1991. Thermosensitive genetic male sterility induced<br />
by irradiation. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics II. Proc. Second Inti. <strong>Rice</strong> Gene. Sympo. 14-18 May 1990.<br />
IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila Philippines.<br />
McCouch, S.R., Nelson, R.J„ Tohme, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zeigler, R.S. 1994. Mapping of blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
genes in rice. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Blast Disease R.S. Zeigler, S.A. Leong <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P.S. Teng (eds). CAB Inti.<br />
Willingford, UK, pp. 167-186.<br />
Mei, M., Dai, X,, Xu, C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q. 1998a. Mapping <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis of the genes for<br />
photoperiod-sensitive genic male sterility in rice using the original mut<strong>an</strong>t Nongken 58S.<br />
Crop Sci. (in press).<br />
Mei, M., Chen, L., Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Z., Li, Z., Xu, C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q. 1998b. pms3 is the locus causing the<br />
original photoperiod-sensitive male sterility mutation of 'Nongken 58S'. Science in China<br />
(Scries C) in press.<br />
Miyamoto, M., Ando, I., Rybka, K., Kodama, O. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kawasaki, S. 1996. High resolution<br />
mapping of the indica-derived rice blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes, I. Pi~b. Molec. Pl<strong>an</strong>t-Microbe<br />
Interact. 9: 6-13.<br />
Moh<strong>an</strong>, M,, Nair, S„ Bentur, J.S., Rao, U.P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Bennett, T. 1994. RFLP <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> RAPD mapping of<br />
rice Gm2 gene that confers resistnace to biotype 1 of gall midge (Orseolia oryzae). Theor.<br />
App. Gen. 87: 782-788.<br />
Moh<strong>an</strong>, M., Sathy<strong>an</strong>aray<strong>an</strong>, P.V., Kumar, A., Srivastava, M.N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nair, S. 1997. Molecular<br />
mapping of a resist<strong>an</strong>ce-specific PCR-based marker linked to a gall midge resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
gene (Gmit) in rice. Theor. Appl. Gen. 95.777-782.<br />
Naqvi, N.I. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chattoo, B.B. 1996. Development of a sequence characterized amplified<br />
region (SCAR) based indirect selection method for a domin<strong>an</strong>t blast-resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene in<br />
rice. Genome 39:26-30.
268 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Ray, J.D,, Yu, L,, McCouch, S.R., Champoux, M,C., W<strong>an</strong>g, G. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nguyen, H.T. 1996. Mapping<br />
qu<strong>an</strong>titative trait loci associated with root penetration ability in rice {Oryza saliva<br />
L.). Theor. Appl. Gen. 92; 627-636.<br />
Redona, E.D, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mackill, D J. 1998. Qu<strong>an</strong>titative trait locus <strong>an</strong>alysis for rice p<strong>an</strong>icle <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
grain characteristics. Theor. Appl. Gene. 96: 957-963.<br />
Rybka, K., Miyamoto, M., Ando, I,, Sai to, A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kawasaki, S. 1997. High resolution mapping<br />
of the indica-derived rice blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes, Il.Pi-fa^.<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pi-ta <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a consideration of<br />
their origin. Molec. Pl<strong>an</strong>t-Microbe Interac. 10:517-524.<br />
Sebasti<strong>an</strong>, L.S., Ikeda, R., Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N., Imbe, T., Coffm<strong>an</strong>, W.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> McCouch, S.R. 1996.<br />
Molecular mapping of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to rice tungro spherical virus <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> green leafhopper.<br />
Phyiopath. 8 6 ; 25-30.<br />
Song, W.Y., W<strong>an</strong>g, G.L., Chen, L.L., Kim, H.S., Pi, L.Y., Holsten, T., Gardner, J., W<strong>an</strong>g, B,,<br />
Zhai, W.X., Zhu, L.H., Fauquet, C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ronald, P. 1995. A receptor kinase-like protein<br />
encoded by the rice disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene, Xa21. Science 270:1804-1806.<br />
Subudhi, P.K., Borkakati, R.P., Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N. 1997. Molecular mapping of a<br />
thermosensitive genetic male sterility gene in rice using bulked segreg<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>alysis.<br />
Genome 40:188-194.<br />
Sun, Z.X., Min, S.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xiong, Z.M. 1989. A temperature-sensitive male sterile line found in<br />
rice. <strong>Rice</strong> gen. Newslett. 6:116-117.<br />
T<strong>an</strong>, Y., Yu, S., Li, J., Xu, C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q. 1998. The three traits of cooking <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> eating quality<br />
of rice are specified by the waxy locus. Abstract 6 th Inti. Symp. <strong>Rice</strong> Molecular Biology,<br />
October 31-November 2, Sh<strong>an</strong>ghai <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> H<strong>an</strong>gzhou, 1998, p. 63.<br />
Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Voc, P.P. 1991. Induction of photo <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thermo-sensitive genic male<br />
sterility in indica rice. Agron. Abstr. 119.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, B., Xu, W., W<strong>an</strong>g, J. Wu, W., Zheng, H., Y<strong>an</strong>g, Z., Ray, J.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nguyen, PI.T. 1995.<br />
Tagging <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mapping the thermo-sensitive genic male-sterile gene in rice (Oryza saliva<br />
L.) with molecular nr\arkers. Theor. Appl. Gene. 91:1111-1114.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, F. 1998. PSMS gene pmsl: fine mapping, preliminary physical map construction <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis. Ph. D. Diss. Huazhong Agricultural Univ.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, G., Mackill, D.J., Bonm<strong>an</strong>, J.M., McCouch, S.R., Champoux, M.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nelson, R.J.<br />
1994. RFLP mapping of genes conferring complete <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> partial resist<strong>an</strong>ce to blast in a<br />
durably resist<strong>an</strong>t rice cultivar. Genetics 136:1421-1434,<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, J., Liu, K., Xu, C., Li, X. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q. 1998. The high level of wide-compatibility of<br />
variety 'Dular' has a complex genetic basis. Theor. Appl. Gene. 97:407-412.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, Z., Zheng, F., Shen, G., Gao, J., Snusted, D.P., Li, M., Zh<strong>an</strong>g, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hong, M. 1995.The<br />
amylose content in rice endosperm is related to the post-tr<strong>an</strong>slational regulation of the<br />
waxy gene. Pl<strong>an</strong>t J. 7: 613-622.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, Z., Y<strong>an</strong>u, M., Yam<strong>an</strong>ouchl, U., Iwamoto, M., Monna, L., Hayasaka, H., Katayose, Y.<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sasaki, T. 1998. Map-based cloning <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> characterization of the rice blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
gene Pib. Abstract 6 th Inti. Symp, <strong>Rice</strong> Molecular Biology, October 31 -November 2,<br />
Sh<strong>an</strong>ghai <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> H<strong>an</strong>gzhou, 69. pp.<br />
Williams, C.E., W<strong>an</strong>g, B., Holsten, T.E., Scambray, J., De Assis, G.D.S.F. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ronald, P.C.<br />
1996. Markers for selection of the riceX«21 disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene. Theor. Appl, Genet. 93:<br />
1119-1122.<br />
Wu, P., Zh<strong>an</strong>g, G. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N. (1996). Identification of QTLs controlling qu<strong>an</strong>tative<br />
characters, in rice using RFLP markers. Euphytica 89: 349-354,<br />
Wu, P., Luo, A., Zhu, L., Y<strong>an</strong>g, J., Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senadhira, D. 1997. Molecular markers<br />
linked to genes underlying seedling toler<strong>an</strong>ce for ferrous iron toxicity. In; Pl<strong>an</strong>t Nutrition<br />
for Sustainable Food Production <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Environment. T. Ando et al. (eds.), Kluwer Academic<br />
Publishers, Jap<strong>an</strong>.<br />
If ii
Qifa Zh<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sibih Yu 269<br />
Xiao, Li, J., Yu<strong>an</strong>, L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D. 1995. Domin<strong>an</strong>ce is the major genetic basis of<br />
heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL <strong>an</strong>alysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140:745-<br />
754.<br />
Xiao, J., Li, J., Yu<strong>an</strong>, L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D, 1996a. Identification of QTLs affecting traits of<br />
agronomic import<strong>an</strong>ce in a recombin<strong>an</strong>t inbred populatin derived from a subspecific rice<br />
cross. Theor. Appl Gen. 92:230-244.<br />
Xiao, J., Gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>illo, S., Ahn, S.N., McCouch, S.R., T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D., Li,<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yu<strong>an</strong>, L. 1996b.<br />
Genes from wild rice improve yield. Nature 384:223-224.<br />
Xiong, L., W<strong>an</strong>g, S., Liu, K., Dai, X., Saghai Maroof, M.A., Hu, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q. 1998a.<br />
Distribution of microsatelUte <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> AFLP markers on molecular linkage map in rice. Acta<br />
Botánica Sínica 40; 605-614.<br />
Xiong, L., Liu, K., Dai, X., Xu, C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q, 1998b. Identification of genetic factors<br />
controlling domestication-related traits of rice using a Fj population of a cross between<br />
Oryza sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. rufipogon. Theor. Appl. Gen. (in press),<br />
Xu, K, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mackill, D.J. 1996. A major locus for submergence toler<strong>an</strong>ce mapped on rice<br />
chromosome 9, Moke. Breed. 2:219-224.<br />
Yadav, R., Courtois, B., Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Melaren, G. 1997. Mapping genes controlling root<br />
morphology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> root distribution in a doubied-haploid population of rice. Theor. Appl.<br />
Genet. 94; 619-632.<br />
Y<strong>an</strong>agihara, S., McCouch, S.R., Ishikawa, K., Ogi, Y., Maruyama, K., <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ikeshashi, H. 1995.<br />
Molecular <strong>an</strong>alysis of the inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of the S-5 locus conferring wide compatibility in<br />
indica/japonica hybrids of rice (Oryza sativa L.) Theor. Appl. Genet. 90:182-188.<br />
Y<strong>an</strong>g, R., Li<strong>an</strong>g, K., W<strong>an</strong>g, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chen, S. 1992. A recessive gene in Indica rice 5460s for<br />
thermosensitive genic male sterility. <strong>Rice</strong> Gen. Newslett. 9:56-57.<br />
Y<strong>an</strong>o, M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sasaki, T. 1997. Genetic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> molecular dissection of qu<strong>an</strong>titative traits in rice.<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>t Molec. Biol. 35:145-153.<br />
Y<strong>an</strong>o, M., Harushima, Y., Nagamura, Y., Kurata, N., Minobe, Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sasaki, T. 1997. Identification<br />
of qu<strong>an</strong>titative trait loci controlling heading date in rice using a high-density<br />
linkage map. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:1025-1032.<br />
Yao, F., Xu, C., Yu, S., Li, J., Gao, Y., Li, X. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q. 1997. Mapping <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis<br />
of two fertility restorer loci in the wild-abortive cytoplasmic male sterility system of rice<br />
{Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 98:183-187..<br />
Yoshimura, S., Umehara, Y,, Kurata, N,, Nagamura, Y., Sasaki, T., Minobe, Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Iwata, N.<br />
1996. Identification of a YAC clone carrying the Xa-1 allele, a bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
gene in rice. Theor. Appl. Gen. 93:117-122.<br />
Yoshimura, S., Yoshimura, A., Iwata, N., McCouch, S.R., Abenes, M.L., Baraoid<strong>an</strong>, M.R.,<br />
Mew, T.W. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Neslon, R.J. 1995. Tagging <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> combining bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
genes in rice using RAPD <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> RFLP markers. Molec. Breed. 1:375-387.<br />
Yoshimura, S., Yam<strong>an</strong>ouch, U., Katayose, Y., Toki, S,, W<strong>an</strong>g, Z.X., Kono, I., Kurata, N., Y<strong>an</strong>o,<br />
M., Iwata, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sasaki. T. 1998. Expression of Xa-1, a bacterial blight-resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene in<br />
rice, is induced by bacterial inoculation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:1663-1668.<br />
Young, J.B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. 1984. Inherit<strong>an</strong>ce of fertility restoration in a rice cross. <strong>Rice</strong> Gen.<br />
Newslett. 1; 102-103.<br />
Young, N.D, 1996. QTL mapping <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> qu<strong>an</strong>titative disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce in pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Ann, Rev.<br />
Phytopath. 34: 479-501.<br />
Yu, S., Li, J., Xu, G., T<strong>an</strong>, Y., Gao, Y., Li, X., Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Saghai Maroof, M.A. 1997.<br />
Import<strong>an</strong>ce of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in <strong>an</strong> elite rice hybrid. Proc. Natl,<br />
Acad. Sci. USA 94: 9226-9231.<br />
Yu, Z., Mackill, D.J., Bonm<strong>an</strong>, J.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D. 1991. Tagging genes for blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
in rice via linkage to RFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Gen. 81:471-476.
270 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Yu, Z., Mackill, D.J., Bonm<strong>an</strong>, J.M., McCouch, S.R., Guiderdoni, E., Notteghem, J.L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D. 1996. Molecular mapping of genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to rice blast {Pyricularia<br />
grísea Sacc.) Theor. Appl. Gen. 93: 859-863.<br />
Zh<strong>an</strong>g, D., Deng, X., Yu, G., Lin X., Xie, Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Li, Z. 1990, Chromosomal location of the<br />
photoperiod sensitive male sterile gene in Nongken 58S./. Huazhong Agricu. Uni. 9:407-<br />
419.<br />
Zh<strong>an</strong>g, G., Angeles, E.R., Abenes, M.L.P., Khush, G.S, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N. 1996a. RAPD <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> RFLP<br />
mapping of the bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene xa-13 in rice. Theor. Appl. Gen. 93:65-70.<br />
Zh<strong>an</strong>g, G., Bharaj, T.S., Lu, Y., Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N. 1997. Mapping of the'R/-3 nuclear<br />
fertility-restoring gene for WA cytoplasmic male sterility in rice using RAPD <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> RFLP<br />
markers, Theor. Appl Gen. 94; 27-33.<br />
Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q., Gao, Y., Y<strong>an</strong>g, S., Ragab, R.A., Saghai Maroof, M.A, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Li, Z, 1994a. A diallel<br />
<strong>an</strong>alysis of heterosis in elite hybrid rice based on RFLPs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> microsatellites. Theor. Appl,<br />
Gen. 89:185-192,<br />
Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q., Shen, B., Dai, X., Mei, M., Saghai Maroof, M.A, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Li, Z..1994b. Using bulked<br />
extremes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> recessive class to map genes for photoperiod-sensitive genic male sterility<br />
in rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sd. USA 91: 8675-8679.<br />
Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q., Gao, Y., Saghai Maroof, M.A., Y<strong>an</strong>g, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Li, J. 1995. Molecular divergence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
hybrid perform<strong>an</strong>ce in rice. Molec. Breed. 1:133-142.<br />
Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q,, Zhou, Z,, Y<strong>an</strong>g, G„ Xu, C., Liu, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Saghai Maroof, M.A, 1996b. Molecular<br />
marker heterozygosity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hybrid perform<strong>an</strong>ce in indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica rice. Theor. Appl.<br />
Gen. 93; 1218-1224.<br />
Zaho, M., Li, X., Y<strong>an</strong>g, J., Xu, C., Hu, R., Liu, D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zh<strong>an</strong>g, Q. 1998. Relationship between<br />
molecular marker heterozygosity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hybrid perform<strong>an</strong>ce in intra-<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> inter-subspecific<br />
crosses of vice. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Breed, {in press):<br />
Zheng, K., Shen, P., Qi<strong>an</strong>, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W<strong>an</strong>g, J. 1992. Tagging genes for wide compatibility in rice<br />
via linkage to RFLP markers. Cliittese /. Ric. Sci. 6:145-150.<br />
Zheng, K., Qi<strong>an</strong>, H., Zhu<strong>an</strong>g, J., Lu, J., Lin, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kochert, G. 1995. Tagging rice blast<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes via DNA markers. Acta Phytopathologica Sínica 25:307-313.<br />
Zhou, T. 1983. Analysis of R genes in hybrid indica rice of 'WA' type. Acta Agronómica Sínica<br />
9: 241-247.<br />
Zhu, L., Xu, J., Chen, Y., Ling, Z., Lu, C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Xu, Y. 1994. Mapping <strong>an</strong> unknown gene for rice<br />
blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce using molecular markers. Science in China (Series B) 24:1048-1052.<br />
Zhu<strong>an</strong>g, J., Lin, H., Lu, J., Qi<strong>an</strong>,H., Hittalm<strong>an</strong>i, S., Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zheng, K. 1997. Analysis of<br />
QTL X environment interaction for yield components <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>t height in rice. Theor.<br />
Appl Gen. 95\ 799-808.<br />
\ I!
12<br />
Exploitation of Alien Species<br />
in <strong>Rice</strong> Improvement-<br />
Opportunities,<br />
Achievements <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Future<br />
Challenges<br />
K.K. Jena^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. Khush^<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> (O. sativa L.) is one of the most import<strong>an</strong>t cereal crops in the world<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is the major staple for 35% of the world population. It is cultivated<br />
worldwide under diverse agroclimatic conditions. However, rice<br />
productivity is affected by several biotic (diseases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insects) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> abiotic<br />
(adverse soils, temperature <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> water conditions) stresses limiting<br />
increased rice production. Rapid population growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> shrinking<br />
cultivable l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> dem<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> increased rice yield by incorporating<br />
agronomically import<strong>an</strong>t genes such as resist<strong>an</strong>ce to major diseases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
insects from alien species. Some of the major diseases <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insects affecting<br />
rice production include bacterial leaf blight (BB), blast (Bl), sheath blight<br />
(ShB), brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper (BPH), white-backed pl<strong>an</strong>thopper (WBPH),<br />
^Biotechnology Centre, Mahyco Research Foundation Hyderabad 500 073 India.<br />
^ Pl<strong>an</strong>t Breeding Department, International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, M<strong>an</strong>ila,<br />
Philippines
272 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stem borer, while abiotic stresses include drought, salinity, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
submergence.<br />
The genetic variability for some useful traits are either limited in<br />
cultivated rice germplasms or due to ch<strong>an</strong>ges in insect biotype or disease<br />
race make the cultivars susceptible. In this context, it is import<strong>an</strong>t to<br />
broaden the rice gene pool by in introgressing new genes from alien<br />
species to meet the challenges of rice production. The wild species of<br />
Oryza are a rich source of agronomically import<strong>an</strong>t genes. However,<br />
several barriers, such as genome incompatibility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chromosome non<br />
homology, limit successful gene tr<strong>an</strong>sfer (Brar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1986; Khush<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Brar, 1992). Recent adv<strong>an</strong>ces in tissue culture coupled with tools of<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>breeding</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> biotechnology have the exploitation of alien species<br />
of Oryza in rice improvement possible.<br />
Wild species of the genes Oryza have recently shown several<br />
adv<strong>an</strong>tages over other methods of gene tr<strong>an</strong>sfer for rice improvement.<br />
Alien gene tr<strong>an</strong>sfer from wild rices in nonhazardous <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> environment<br />
friendly, which is most import<strong>an</strong>t for the safety of hum<strong>an</strong> beings.<br />
SPECIATION IN GENUS ORYZA<br />
The genus Oryza comprises two cultivated species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> twenty-one wild<br />
species. The Asi<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice, O. sativa {2n ~ 24), is grown<br />
throughout the world while the Afric<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice, O. glaberrima, is<br />
limited to cultivation in West Africa. The progenitor of O, sativa is the<br />
common wild rice O, rufipogonfO. peretinis that exists in perennial form<br />
as well as <strong>an</strong>nual types such as O. nivara. In a parallel evolutionary<br />
pathway, the progenitor of 0 . glaberrima is O. longistaminata with O.<br />
breviligulata in the <strong>an</strong>nual form (Ch<strong>an</strong>g, 1976). The cultivated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> related<br />
wild species belonging to the O. sativa complex are easily crossable <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
share a common A A genome. Species O. sativa, O. glaberrima, O. nivara,<br />
O. rufipogon, O, breviligulata, O. longistaminata, O. glumaepatula, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
meridionalis from the primary gene pool of rice. The wild species<br />
belonging to the O. offid<strong>an</strong>alis. complex are O. punctata, O. officinalis, O,<br />
rhizomatis, O. eichingeri, O. minuta, O, latifoHa, O. alta, O, gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis, O.<br />
australiensis, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. hrachy<strong>an</strong>atha. They have BB, CC, CC, CC, BBCC,<br />
CCDD, CCDD, CCDD, EE, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> FF genomes respectively. These species<br />
from the secondary gene pool of rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are partially homologous or<br />
nonhomo logous to A A genome species, resulting in limited crossover<br />
(Khush, 1977). All the dist<strong>an</strong>tly related wild species belonging to the<br />
O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a complex constitute the tertiary gene pool These species are<br />
O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a, O. gr<strong>an</strong>úlala, O. ridleyi, O. longiglumis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. schlechteri.<br />
They belong to GG <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> HHJJ genomes except for O. schlecheri whose
K.K, Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S, Khush 273<br />
genome is still not known (Aggarwal et al., 1996). The wild species have<br />
either In = 24 or 2n = 48 chromosomes.<br />
USEFUL CHARACTERS OF WILD SPECIES IN ORYZA<br />
The rice O. sativa is grown worldwide under a wide r<strong>an</strong>ge of<br />
agroclimatic conditions <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is affected by several biotic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> abiotic<br />
stresses. Even though a resist<strong>an</strong>ce source is available in cultivated rice<br />
germplasm/ the resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties are becoming vulnerable to pests <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
diseases due to ch<strong>an</strong>ges in insect biotypes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> disease races <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> as a<br />
result rice productivity has reduced. In order to create genetic variability<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> broaden the gene pool of rice, there is a need to look for useful genes<br />
from alien germplasm sources. The wild species of Oryza have a rich<br />
source of genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to diseases, insects, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> several abiotic<br />
stresses (Table 12.1). Even the genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to. sheath blight,<br />
tungro, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yellow stemborer are available only in some wild Oryza<br />
species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are not present or very limited within the cultivated rice<br />
germplasm. In this context, there is <strong>an</strong> urgent need to exploit wild<br />
species of Oryza by introgressing agronomically import<strong>an</strong>t genes for<br />
broadening the cultivated rice gene pool to increase rice production<br />
(Table 12,2)<br />
Table 12,1<br />
Genome composition <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> agronomically useful traits of Oryza species<br />
Species Genome Agronomically useful traits’^<br />
O. sativa complex<br />
0 , satwa AA Gültigen<br />
O. nivara AA Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to grassy stunt virus <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> B1<br />
0. rufipogon/perennis AA Elongation ability, resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BB, source of CMS<br />
0. glaberrima A®A® Gültigen<br />
0. breviligulata A8A« Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to GLH <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> BB<br />
O, longistaminata ASAS Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BB<br />
0. meriodionalis A»a “' Elongation ability<br />
O. glutmepatula<br />
ASPASP Elongation ability, source of CMS<br />
O. o/A’dnalis complex<br />
0. punctata BB^BBCC Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ZLH<br />
0. minuta BBCC Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to ShB, BB, Bl, BPH, GLH<br />
0 . officinalis CC Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH, WBPH, GLH <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thrips<br />
0. rhizomatis CC Drought avoid<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Ó. eichingeri CC Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to yellow mottle virus, BPH, GLH<br />
O, alta CCDD Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to stem borer, high biomass<br />
production<br />
0 , gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis CCDD High biomass production<br />
0 . latifolia CCDD Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH, high biomass production<br />
0. australiensis EE Drought toler<strong>an</strong>ce, resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH<br />
0. brachy<strong>an</strong>atha FF Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to yellow stem borer, leaf folder,<br />
whorl maggot
274 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Table 12,1 Contd,<br />
Species Genome Agronomically useful traits'^<br />
O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a complex<br />
0 . gr<strong>an</strong>ulata GG Shade toler<strong>an</strong>ce, adaptation to aerobic soil<br />
O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a GG Adaptation to aerobic soil<br />
0. ridleyi complex<br />
0. longiglumis HHJJ Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BB, B1<br />
0. ridleyi HHJJ Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to stem borer, BB, Bl<br />
0. schlecteri not known —<br />
B1: Blast; B B : bacterial leaf blight; GLH: green leafhopper; ZLH : zigzag leafhopper;<br />
WBPH : white-backed pl<strong>an</strong>thopper; ShB ; sheath blight; BPH: brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper.<br />
Table 12.2<br />
Agronomically import<strong>an</strong>t genes introgressed from wild Oryza<br />
species into cultivated rice<br />
íKii!<br />
Genes<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sferred<br />
to 0 . sativa<br />
Donor<br />
species<br />
Genome<br />
IRRI<br />
accession<br />
number<br />
Grassy stunt '<br />
0 . nivara AA 101508<br />
virus resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Bacterial blight 0, longistaminata AA —<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce 0. officinalis CC 100896<br />
O. minuta BBCC 101141<br />
Blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce 0. minuta BBCC 101141<br />
BPH resist<strong>an</strong>ce 0. officinalis CC 100896<br />
0. australiensis EE 100882<br />
WBPH resist<strong>an</strong>ce 0, officinalis CC 100896<br />
Cytoplasmic male 0. sativa i. spont<strong>an</strong>ea AA —<br />
sterility 0. perennis AA 104823<br />
Yellow stemborer 0. hrachy<strong>an</strong>tha FF 101232<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce* 0. ridleyi HHJJ 100821<br />
Sheath blight<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce*<br />
0. minuta BBCC 101141<br />
* Adv<strong>an</strong>ced backcross progerües are being produced at IRRI.<br />
ALIEN GENES INTROGRESSED FROM PRIMARY GENE POOL<br />
Several alien genes have been introgressed from the AA genome wild<br />
species into O. sativa. These genes are grassy stunt virus resist<strong>an</strong>ce (Gs)<br />
from O. nivara, cytoplasmic male sterility (GMS) from O. sativa<br />
f. spont<strong>an</strong>ea <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more recently bacterial leaft blight (BB) resist<strong>an</strong>ce from<br />
O. longistaminata. The genes are tr<strong>an</strong>sferred with no crossability <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
recombination barriers.<br />
Introgression of Gene(s) for Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to Grassy Stunt Virus<br />
A severe epidemic of grassy stunt virus occurred in rice during the<br />
1970s. The vector for tr<strong>an</strong>smission of grassy stunt virus is the brown
K.K. Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. Khush 275<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>thopper (BPH). The infected rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts either produce no p<strong>an</strong>icles<br />
or produce small p<strong>an</strong>icles with deformed grains. Of the 6,723 accessions<br />
of cultivated rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> several wild species accessions of Orym screened<br />
at IRRI for resist<strong>an</strong>ce, only one accession of O. nivara (Acc. 101508) was<br />
found to be resist<strong>an</strong>t (Ling et al„ 1970). Crosses were made between<br />
improved rice varieties such as IRS, IR20, IR24, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. nivara <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene was tr<strong>an</strong>sferred into cultivated rice by three backcrosses<br />
with no crossability barrier. Several high-yielding grassy stunt virusresist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
varieties, such as IR28, IR29, IR30, IR32, IR34, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR36, were<br />
released for cultivation across rice-growing countries. Subsequently,<br />
several other grassy stunt virus-resist<strong>an</strong>t varieties were developed in<br />
different countries.<br />
Introgression of a Gene for Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BB<br />
BB caused by X<strong>an</strong>thomonas oryzae pv. oryzae is the one of the most<br />
destructive diseases of rice. A domin<strong>an</strong>t BB resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene X«-21 has<br />
been tr<strong>an</strong>sferred from O. longistaminata into IR24 by backcrossing<br />
(IQiush et aU 1990). This gene has shown a wide spectrum of resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
to a large number of races of BB (Ikeda et al., 1990).<br />
Introgression of CMS genes from wild Oryza Species<br />
The development of CMS lines with the nuclear genome of rice has been<br />
possible by exploiting the cytoplasm of the wild species O. sativa<br />
f. spont<strong>an</strong>ea. This wild species was discovered in Hain<strong>an</strong> Isl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in China<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> was identified to have wild abortive (WA) cytoplasm causing male<br />
sterility with abortive pollen. Using this novel source of CMS, it has<br />
become possible to develop high-yielding rice hybrids for commercial<br />
cultivation (Lin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yu<strong>an</strong>, 1980). Recently, diversification of CMS from<br />
the WA cytoplasm source to <strong>an</strong>other AA genome wild species became<br />
possible by identifying a new CMS source from O. perennisfO. tufipogon<br />
after making interspecific crosses with 46 accessions of AA genome wild<br />
species (Dalmacio et al, 1995), This new CMS source is IR66707 A with<br />
the nuclear genome of IR64 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is independent of the WA cytoplasm<br />
present in V20A. Another CMS line from O. glumaepatula has also been<br />
identified recently (Dalmacio et al, 1996).<br />
Alien Genes Introgressed from Secondary Gene Pool<br />
Interspecific hybrids between rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> wild species belonging to the<br />
secondary gene pool are difficult to produce. Very low crossability <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>
276 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
degeneration of hybrid embryos during early stages of development are<br />
the major constraints of these crosses. These interspecific hybrids are<br />
male sterile <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> embryo rescue is a must to develop hybrids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
backcrossing to recurrent O, sativa parent is needed until partially fertile<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts with normal chromosome complement (disomies) having 2n = 24<br />
or monosomic alien addition lines (MAAL) having 2« + 1 = 25<br />
chromosomes are produced (Fig. 12.1), The fertile progenies are selfed<br />
to develop alien gene introgression lines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> evaluated for tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of<br />
desirable agronomic traits.<br />
hji;<br />
Fig. 12,1<br />
An embryo rescue technique used for developing interspecific hybrids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
backcross progenies in rice.<br />
ALIEN GENE INTROGRESSION FROM BB GENOME<br />
Interspecific hybrids have been developed between the autotetraploid<br />
of a japónica cultivar, Nipponbare, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. punctata {2n = 24; BB). Several
H T »<br />
K.K. Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. Khush 277<br />
MAALs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> disomie progenies have been produced (Yasui <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Iwata,<br />
1991). However^ the progenies have not yet been evaluated for<br />
introgression of useful genes from O. punctata.<br />
Alien Gene Introgression from CC Genome<br />
Interspecific hybrids between cultivated rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CC genome wild<br />
species have been produced by me<strong>an</strong>s of embryo rescue (Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush,<br />
1984; Fig. 1 2 .2 ), Several introgression lines were produced from this cross<br />
which have iriherited different gènes from O. officinalis (Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush,<br />
1989,1990). Agronomically import<strong>an</strong>t genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH, whitebacked<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>thopper (WBPH) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> BB have been tr<strong>an</strong>sferred into <strong>an</strong> elite<br />
<strong>breeding</strong> line of rice (Fig. 12,3). Of the 25 BC2px disomie progenies, 6<br />
segregated for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 12 segregated for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />
WBPH. The recurrent parent IR31917-45-3-2 is susceptible to all<br />
Philippine <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Indi<strong>an</strong> biotypes of BPH where as O. officinalis accession<br />
number 100896 is resist<strong>an</strong>t to these biotypes. Several introgression lines<br />
have been produced which are resist<strong>an</strong>t to BPH, biotypes of the<br />
Philippines, India, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> B<strong>an</strong>gladesh (Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1990).<br />
Fig. 12.2<br />
An interspecific hybrid pl<strong>an</strong>t (Fj) produced from a cross between IR31917-45-<br />
3~2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. officinalis.
278 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
/;<br />
'<br />
H<br />
'<br />
®§i<br />
list r i l f t<br />
a S ; ;<br />
Fig. 12.3<br />
Reaction of several introgression lines derived from O, mliva <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. offiunalis<br />
cross to brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper (BPH). Note several resist<strong>an</strong>t introgression lines<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> susceptible lines.<br />
Some of the BPH resist<strong>an</strong>t progenies have been evaluated in replicated<br />
yield trials. Most of the introgression lines had excellent yield<br />
potential <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> some outyielded the check varieties by a small margin<br />
(Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1990). Since the selected lines were free from<br />
undesirable traits of wild species^ three BPH resist<strong>an</strong>t lines were released<br />
as varieties for commercial cultivation in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam.<br />
IR54751-2-44-15-24-3 was named as MTL98, IR54751-2-34-10-6-2 as<br />
MTL103, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR54751-2-41-10-5-1 as MTL 105 (Brar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1997).<br />
Some of the resist<strong>an</strong>t lines are also used as donors for resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice<strong>breeding</strong><br />
programs in m<strong>an</strong>y countries. Besides resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH, genes<br />
for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to WBPH, BB <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> some morphological traits such as hull<br />
color, pigmented pericarp, <strong>an</strong>thocy<strong>an</strong>in pigmentation of stigma,<br />
apiculus, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leaf sheath inherited from O. officinalis into O. saliva have<br />
been identified (Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, unpubl.)<br />
ALIEN GENE INTROGRESSION FROM BBCC GENOME<br />
Interspecific hybrids between O. saliva <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the allotetraploid wild<br />
species O. minula {2n = 48) have been produced. Following backcrossing
K.K. Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. Khush 279<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> embryo rescue^ adv<strong>an</strong>ced progenies were developed. The adv<strong>an</strong>ced<br />
progenies were evaluated for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BB <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> blast. One of the two<br />
introgression lines was resist<strong>an</strong>t to Race 6 of BB <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>other line to Race<br />
P06-6 of blast (Am<strong>an</strong>ta-Bordeos et ah, 1992).<br />
ALIEN GENE INTROGRESSION FROM CCDD GENOME<br />
Interspecific hybrids have been produced between cultivated rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
different wild species of CCDD genome using the embryo rescue<br />
technique. Following backcrosses <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chromosome elimination;<br />
introgression lines inheriting genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH; WBPH; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
BB from O. latifolia have been developed Qena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, unpubl.)<br />
ALIEN GENE INTROGRESSION FROM EE GENOME<br />
Interspecific hybrids between diploid O. sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. australimsis were<br />
produced by embryo rescue (Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1984). However, this<br />
particular hybrid did not produce backcross progeny upon repeated<br />
backcrossing of hybrids with the recurrent O. sativa parent. Hence,<br />
interspecific hybrids between colchicine—^induced autotetraploid<br />
cultivated rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. australimsis have been produced by embryo<br />
rescue. Following two backcrosses with the recurrent O. sativa parent,<br />
disomic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>euploid progenies were produced which inherited O.<br />
australiensis traits such as long awn, earliness for flowering, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH. Evaluation of 600 BC2F4 progenies revealed<br />
introgression of genes for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH in four lines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one line<br />
was resist<strong>an</strong>t to Race 6 of BB Qene et ah, 1991; Mult<strong>an</strong>i et ah, 1994),<br />
ALIEN GENE INTROGRESSION FROM FF GENOME<br />
The wild species O. brachy<strong>an</strong>tha is resist<strong>an</strong>t to the yellow stem borer,<br />
whorl maggot, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> some races of BB. Introgression lines were developed<br />
through production of intraspecific hybrid between O. sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
wild species O. brachy<strong>an</strong>tha followed by backcrossing with the recurrent<br />
parent (IR56). Some introgression lines showed resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BB Races 1,<br />
2, 3, 4, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 6 of the Philippines which had been tr<strong>an</strong>sferred through<br />
limited recombination from O. brachy<strong>an</strong>tha (Brar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1997).<br />
However, none of the introgression lines showed resist<strong>an</strong>ce to the yellow<br />
stem borer.
280 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Pridrities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
ALIEN GENE INTROGRESSION FROM GG AND HHJJ GENOME<br />
Wild Oryza species belonging to the GG genome are the source of gene<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce to water stress or drought <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> HHJJ genome species are the<br />
source of gene resist<strong>an</strong>ce to the stem borer. Herice, efforts have been<br />
made at IRRI to produce hybrids between rice cultvars <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> these species<br />
(Ellor<strong>an</strong> ei al, 1992). Hybrids have been produced <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> introgression<br />
lines are being developed for the tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of agronomically import<strong>an</strong>t<br />
traits into rice,<br />
MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF ALIEN GENES<br />
TRANSFERRED FROM WILD SPECIES INTO<br />
CULTIVATED RICE<br />
I<br />
r<br />
! !<br />
Recent developments in molecular <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cellular <strong>genetics</strong> have made it<br />
possible to map <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> characterize a few alien genes via linkage to DNA<br />
markers using RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
RAPD (r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om amplified polymorphic DNA) <strong>an</strong>alysis.<br />
Mapping of Xa~21 Gene for BB Resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
The near isogenic line (NIL) of rice cultivar IR24 containing a gene Xa-21<br />
introgressed from O. longistaminata conferred resist<strong>an</strong>ce to all races of<br />
BB. RFLP <strong>an</strong>alysis of this NIL with several DNA markers identified a<br />
marker RG103 located on rice chromosome 11 detected polymorphism<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the marker cosegregated with Xfl-21 gene for BB resist<strong>an</strong>ce. All<br />
other DNA markers of chromosome 11 were monomorphic between the<br />
NIL <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IR24 (Ronald et al 1992). Further <strong>an</strong>alysis of the NIL with<br />
RAPD markers identified two RAPD markers—^RAPD 818 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> RAPD<br />
248—^which cosegregated with resist<strong>an</strong>ce locus Xa-21. Physical <strong>an</strong>alysis<br />
of the Xa-21 gene locus revealed a close interrelationship between RAPD<br />
markers (Song et al,1995) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> isolated Xa-21 gene by positional cloning;<br />
this gene was subsequently used for genetic tr<strong>an</strong>sformation of rice for<br />
BB resist<strong>an</strong>ce. The tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic pl<strong>an</strong>ts carrying the Xa-21 gene expressed a<br />
high level of resist<strong>an</strong>ce to the BB pathogen (W<strong>an</strong>g et al., 1996). This<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene (Xa-21) encodes a putative receptor kinase (Ronald,<br />
1997).<br />
RFLP Analysis of Alien Gene Introgression<br />
Fifty-two introgression lines derived from O. sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. officinalis<br />
crosses have been <strong>an</strong>alyzed withy 188 RFLP markers distributed over<br />
the rice chromosomes (Jena et at,, 1992). Of the 174 informative markers.
ii<br />
K.K. Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. Khush 281<br />
only 28 RFLP markers identified the introgression of 0\ officinalis<br />
chromosomal segments in some introgression lines. Introgressed<br />
segments were small <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> present on 1 1 of the 1 2 rice chromosomes<br />
(Pig, 12.4). Introgression of small segments as observed in this cross<br />
require double crossovers which is in contrast to chromosome pairing<br />
between AA <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CC genomes. In most caseS/ O. sativa alleles were<br />
replaced by O. officinalis alleles, indicating reciprocal recombination as<br />
the mech<strong>an</strong>ism of gene tr<strong>an</strong>sfer between O. officinalis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. sativa<br />
(Fig. 12.5). A putative DNA marker linked to the BPH resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene<br />
derived from O. officinalis was identified but further <strong>research</strong> is in<br />
progress to confirm it (Jena, unpubl.)<br />
1<br />
T4GZ<br />
. T 636<br />
4 ..7 7<br />
140<br />
636<br />
1430<br />
620<br />
013' 13<br />
6S4<br />
89<br />
744<br />
158 ®<br />
139 6<br />
252 11<br />
6<br />
656<br />
25 10<br />
157<br />
10<br />
171 16<br />
644<br />
152<br />
jf'<br />
104<br />
3M_k.fi<br />
OP<br />
14<br />
944 ' 6<br />
476 0<br />
409 V fi<br />
|329<br />
^11 [J<br />
17<br />
460<br />
227 23<br />
722<br />
746<br />
161<br />
160<br />
122<br />
177<br />
464<br />
i 163<br />
26<br />
666<br />
207<br />
313<br />
403<br />
229<br />
470<br />
[] “<br />
m *<br />
400<br />
213 25<br />
136 6<br />
■■64 , ,<br />
264<br />
123<br />
351_?<br />
■H»<br />
404 %<br />
.10<br />
r f i'* '<br />
424 17<br />
162<br />
172<br />
778 '1<br />
6<br />
244<br />
433<br />
40<br />
■•4<br />
|711<br />
16<br />
156 ^9<br />
170-<br />
173<br />
611<br />
685<br />
|a33<br />
106<br />
27<br />
634 “<br />
432<br />
653<br />
141<br />
125<br />
667<br />
662<br />
1 0 1 1<br />
1 2<br />
363 T 161<br />
8<br />
9S C!]>76<br />
^ 4 T T aM<br />
12<br />
-131 7<br />
3<br />
2<br />
A■•167<br />
'' ■ Ü-17 2«<br />
T7flS<br />
49B<br />
676<br />
30<br />
■ÍÜ<br />
477<br />
03<br />
- 752<br />
^ 1<br />
511<br />
ills<br />
Fig. 12,4<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> RFLP map showing introgressed segments of O. of^cimlis detected by<br />
RFLP markers. The alien introgressed segments are identified by boxes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
arrows.
282 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Fig. 12.5<br />
Southern hybridization of parents [L<strong>an</strong>e 2 (O. saliva) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 3 (O, officinalis)] <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
one introgression line (L<strong>an</strong>es 6) showing replacment of O. saliva allele (->)<br />
with O. officinalis allele (->}. Individual DNA has been cut by Eco RI <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
probed with RG 214. L<strong>an</strong>e 1 is molecular weight marker (A/Hindi III).<br />
Molecular Tagging of BPH Resist<strong>an</strong>ce Gene<br />
A gene conferring resist<strong>an</strong>ce to three BPH biotypes of the Philippines<br />
was tr<strong>an</strong>sferred into rice from O. australiensis (Jena et ah, 1991). The<br />
introgression line (IR65482-4-136-2-2) derived from the cross was resist<strong>an</strong>t<br />
to BPH. The of the cross between IR65482-4-136-2-2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
susceptible recurrent parent (IR31917-45-3-2) was resist<strong>an</strong>t to BPH, indicating<br />
the domin<strong>an</strong>t nature of the alien gene. This domin<strong>an</strong>t alien gene<br />
for resist<strong>an</strong>ce was <strong>an</strong>alyzed, using several RFLP probes of chromosome<br />
12. Of the 14 polymorphic probes <strong>an</strong>alyzed, only RG457 identified<br />
introgression from O. australiensis into O. saliva. Cosegregation <strong>an</strong>alysis<br />
for BPH reaction <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> RG457 in the F2 population revealed linkage of the<br />
BPH 10(t) gene with a map dist<strong>an</strong>ce of 3.68 + 1.29 cM (Ishii et ah, 1994).<br />
Molecular Mapping of Blast Resist<strong>an</strong>ce Gene<br />
A gene for blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce (Pi-9t) was introgressed into rice from the<br />
tetraploid wild species O. minuta. The introgression line carrying the Pfi<br />
9t gene for blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce was <strong>an</strong>alyzed with RAPD markers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> three<br />
RAPD markers were found to be linked to the Pi-9t gene (Nelson,<br />
unpubL).
FUTURE EXPLOITATION OF ALIEN GERMPLASM<br />
K.K. Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. Khush 283<br />
The rapid progress in. introgression of alien genes into cultivated rices<br />
should provide m<strong>an</strong>y tools <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> valuable information to molecular<br />
biologists <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>t breeders for crop improvement. The availability of<br />
these genes in the background of O. sativa has already opened up several<br />
new areas of <strong>research</strong>. Even though resist<strong>an</strong>ce genes available in<br />
cultivated rice germplasm have been successfully utilized in 'classical<br />
rice-<strong>breeding</strong> programs, for crop protection for nearly a century,<br />
limitation of cultivated genetic resources necessitates incorporation of<br />
more <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more alien genes so that rice production c<strong>an</strong> be increased by<br />
broadening the genetic base. Recent availability of cloned resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
genes could provide additional tools for genetic engineering of<br />
improved rice cultivars by tr<strong>an</strong>sformatiori. QTLs have been identified in<br />
O. rufipogon having wild genes to enh<strong>an</strong>ce yield potential after their<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sfer into cultivated rice (Xiao et ah, 1996). In spite of the great<br />
potential of genes from wild Oryza species, crossability barriers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
limited recombination are the main constraints limiting interspecific<br />
gene tr<strong>an</strong>sfer. Future exploitation of alien germplasm must focus on<br />
enh<strong>an</strong>cing genetic recombination between cultivated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> wild Oryza<br />
species. Researchers should aim at (1) identifying gene(s) controlling<br />
homologous chromosome pairing in Oryza (2 ) enh<strong>an</strong>cement of alien<br />
gene introgression through tissue culture of wide hybrids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> backcross<br />
progenies by promoting recombinational events between cultivated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
wild species genomes, (3) identification of c<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>idate gene(s) through<br />
comparative genome mapping between O. sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> wild species as<br />
demonstrated by Jena et al (1994). With <strong>an</strong> increasing number alien<br />
genes to be introgressed into O. sativa, refinement of gene tr<strong>an</strong>sfer<br />
technology is needed. Such gene tr<strong>an</strong>sfers will eventually lead to a better<br />
underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing of unknown gene products for disease <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insect<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subsequently increased rice productivity.<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
Dr. K.K. Jena is grateful to the World B<strong>an</strong>k, Robert S. McNamara<br />
Fellowship programs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Rockefeller Foundation for fin<strong>an</strong>cial<br />
support for Iris <strong>research</strong> on alien gene tr<strong>an</strong>sfer in rice at I.RRI, USA. Both<br />
authors Mr. B.R. Barwale, Chairm<strong>an</strong>, Mahyco Research Foundation for<br />
his encouragement to write this m<strong>an</strong>uscript. We also th<strong>an</strong>k Springer-<br />
Verlag, Germ<strong>an</strong>y for allowing us to reproduce Fig. 12.4. We are grateful<br />
to Mr. Bh. V. Sarma who formated the m<strong>an</strong>uscript.
284 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
References<br />
i i i<br />
Aggarwal, R,K,, Brar, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1996. Two new genomes in the Oryzfl complex<br />
identified on the basis of molecular divergence <strong>an</strong>alysis using total genomic DNA<br />
hybridization. Mol. Gen, Genet. 254; 1-12.<br />
Am<strong>an</strong>te-Bordeos, A., Sitch, L.A., Nelson, R., Dalmacio, R.D., Oliva, N.P., Aswindoor, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Leung, H. 1992. Tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of bacterial blight <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> blast resist<strong>an</strong>ce from the tetraploid wild<br />
rice Oryza minuta to cultivated rice Oryza sativa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84; 345-357.<br />
Brar, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1986. Wide hybridization <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chromosome m<strong>an</strong>ipulation in<br />
cefelas. In; H <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>book o f pl<strong>an</strong>t cell culture^ Vol. 4: Techniques <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> applications, D.H. Ev<strong>an</strong>s,<br />
W.R. Sharp, P.V. Ammirato (eds,). McMill<strong>an</strong> Publ Co., New York,TJSA, pp. 221-263.<br />
Brar, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1997. Alien introgression in rice. Pl<strong>an</strong>t M ol. Biol, 35:35-47.<br />
Ch<strong>an</strong>g, T.T. 1976. The origin, evolution, cultivation, dissemination <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> diversification of<br />
Asi<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Afric<strong>an</strong> rices. Euphytica 25: 435-444.<br />
Dalmacio, R.D., Brar, D.S., Ishii, T,, Sitch, L.A., Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1995.<br />
Identification <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of a new cytoplasmic male sterility source from Oryza perennis<br />
into indica rice (O. sativa). Euphytica 82: 221-225.<br />
Dalmacio, R.D., Brar, D.S., Virm<strong>an</strong>i, S.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1996. Male sterile line in rice {Oryza<br />
sativa) developed with O. glum aeputula cytoplasm. IRRN 21(1): 22-23.<br />
Ellor<strong>an</strong>, R., Dalmacio, R.D., Brar, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1992. Production of backcross<br />
progenies from a Cross of Oryza sativa x O. gr<strong>an</strong>úlala. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet, Nezvslett. 9:39.<br />
Ikeda, R., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tabien, R.E. 1990. A new resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene to bacterial blight<br />
derived from O. longistam inata. fpn, J, Breed. 40 (Suppl 1): 280-281.<br />
Ishii, T., Brar, D.S., Mult<strong>an</strong>i, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1994. Molecular tagging of genes for brown<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>thopper resist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> earliness introgressed from Oryza australiensis into cultivated<br />
rice, 0. sativa. Genome 37: 217-221.<br />
Jena, K.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1984. Embryo rescue of interspecific hybrids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its scope in rice<br />
improvement. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newslett. 1 ; 133-134.<br />
Jena, K.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S, 1989. Monosomie alien addition lines of rice: production,<br />
morphology, cytology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>breeding</strong> behaviour. Genome 32:449-455.<br />
Jena, K.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1990. Introgression of genes from O ryza officinalis Wall ex Watt to<br />
cultivated rice, O. sativa L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 737-745,<br />
Jena, K.K., Mult<strong>an</strong>i, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1991. Monosomie alien addition lines of Oryza<br />
australiensis a n d alien gene tr<strong>an</strong>sfer. R ice Gen. II: 728.<br />
Jena, K.K., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kochert, G. 1992. RFLP <strong>an</strong>alysis of rice (Oryza sativa L.)<br />
introgression lines. Theor. Appl. Gen. 84: 608-616.<br />
Jena, K.K,, Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kochert, G. 1994. Comparative RFLP mapping of a wild rice,<br />
O ryza officinalis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cultivated rice, O. sativa. Genome 37:382-^89,<br />
Khush, G.S. 1997. Origin, dispersal, cultivation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> variation of rice. Pl<strong>an</strong>t M ol. Biol 35:25-<br />
34.<br />
Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Brar; D.S. 1992. Overcoming the barriers in hybridization. Theor. Apl. Gen.<br />
(Monograph No. 16) pp. 47-61.<br />
Khush, G.S., Bacal<strong>an</strong>gco, E. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ogawa, T. 1990. A new gene for resist<strong>an</strong>ce to bacterial blight<br />
from O. longistam inata. R ice Gen. Newslett. 7:121-122,<br />
Lin, S.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yu<strong>an</strong>, L.P. 1980.. Hybrid rice <strong>breeding</strong> in China. In: Innovative approaches to <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Im provem ent. IRRI, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp 35-51.<br />
Ling, K.C., Aguiero, V.M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Lee, S.H. 1970. A mass screening method for testing resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
to grassy stunt disease of rice. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Dis. Rep. 56:565-569,
K.K. Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. Khush 285<br />
Mult<strong>an</strong>i, D.S,. Jena, K.K., Brar, D.S,. délos Reyes, B.C., Angeles, E.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1994.<br />
Development of monosomic alien addition lines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> introgression of genes from Oryza<br />
australiensis Domin. to cultivated rice O. sativa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:102-109.<br />
Ronald, P.C. 1997. The molecular basis of disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice. Pl<strong>an</strong>t M ol. Biol. 35:179-<br />
186.<br />
Ronald, P.C., Alb<strong>an</strong>o, B., Tabien, R-, Abenes, L., Wu, K., McCouch, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D. 1992.<br />
Genetic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> physical <strong>an</strong>alysis of rice bacterial blight resist<strong>an</strong>ce locus Xfl-21. M ol. Gen.<br />
Genet. 236:113-120.<br />
Song, W.Y., W<strong>an</strong>g, G.L., Chen, L.L., Kim, H.S., Pi, Y.L., Hols ten, T., Gardner, J., W<strong>an</strong>g, B.,<br />
Zhai, W. X,. Zhu, L.H., Fraquet, C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ronald, P. 1995. A receptor kinase like protein<br />
encoded by the rice disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce gene, Xii-21. Science 270:1804-1806.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, G.L., Holsten, T.E., Song, W.Y., W<strong>an</strong>g, H.P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ronald, P.C. 1995. Construction of a<br />
rice bacterial artificial chromosome library <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> identification of clones linked to Xa-21<br />
disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce locus. The P la n t}. 7: 525-533.<br />
Xiao, J., Gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>illo, S., Ahn, S.N., McCouch, S.R., T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yu<strong>an</strong>, L.P. 1996. Genes<br />
from wild rice improve yield Nature 384: 223-224.<br />
Yasui, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Iwata, N. 1991. Production of monosomic alien addition lines of Oryza sativa<br />
having a single O. punctata chromosome. <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics II: 147-155.<br />
i
13<br />
Cyto<strong>genetics</strong> of <strong>Rice</strong><br />
R,J. Singh^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. Khush^<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> wheat are the world's most import<strong>an</strong>t food crops. World rice<br />
production in 1996 was 373.26 million metric tons (Mmt) while wheat<br />
accounted for 609.57 Mmt (FAO, 1996). <strong>Rice</strong> is the principal staple food<br />
source for more th<strong>an</strong> half m<strong>an</strong>kind. However, about 92% of all rice is<br />
produced <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> consumed in Asia (Khush, 1975, 1997).<br />
Cultivated rice belongs to the genus Oryza L,, subfamily Oryzoideae,<br />
in the family Poaceae {Gramineae). The genus Oryza is extremely variable<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> distributed in tropical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> temperate regions of the world<br />
(Vaugh<strong>an</strong>, 1994). <strong>Rice</strong> is cultivated between 36ES to 55EN <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grows<br />
from sea level to <strong>an</strong> altitude of 2^500 m or even higher (Khush <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh,<br />
1991; Khush, 1997).<br />
During the past two decades our knowledge of rice cyto<strong>genetics</strong> has<br />
enh<strong>an</strong>ced at a rapid pace. <strong>Rice</strong> has become a model monocotyledonous<br />
cereal pl<strong>an</strong>t for classical, biochemical, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> molecular genetic studies<br />
(Izawa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shimamoto, 1996). The taxonomy of the genus Oryza is well<br />
defined (Vaugh<strong>an</strong>, 1994) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genomic relationships among species have<br />
been established by classical, cytogenetic, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> molecular methods (Nezu<br />
et at, 1960; Ogawa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Katayama, 1973, 1974; Katayama <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ogawa,<br />
1974; Katayama <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Onizuka, 1978; Katayama et at, 1977; Katayama,<br />
1977,1995, 1997; Nayar, 1973; Oka, 1964; W<strong>an</strong>g et al, 1992; Aggarwal et<br />
^ Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urb<strong>an</strong>a, IL 61801<br />
International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines
\ ]<br />
288 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
at., 1997). <strong>Rice</strong> is a diploid {2n = 24), has a small genome size (2.02 pg)<br />
among major crops (Bennett <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Leitch^ 1997), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> has established<br />
cytogenetic stocks such as primary trisomics^ secondary trisomics^<br />
telotrisomics^ tr<strong>an</strong>slocations^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> monosomic alien addition lines<br />
(MAALs). The cytogenetic stocks have been employed to develop<br />
cytologicab classical^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> molecular linkage maps of rice (Khush el ah,<br />
1984; Iwata <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Omura^ 1984; McCouch et ah, 1988; Singh et ah, 1996a,<br />
1996b; Yu et ah, 1995; Khush et ah, 1996; Chen et ah, 1997). The production<br />
of a series of MAALs from wide crosses has enabled the<br />
introgression of economically useful alien genes into cultivated rice<br />
(Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1989; Jena et ah, 1992; Mult<strong>an</strong>i et ah, 1994).<br />
BIOSYSTEMATICS<br />
; I<br />
The genus Oryza belongs to the subfamily Oryzoideae, tribe Oryzeae in the<br />
family Poaceae {Gramineae). Vaugh<strong>an</strong> (1994) described 23 distinct species<br />
in the genus <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grouped them into four species complexes. These are:<br />
O. saliva complex, O, officinalis complex, O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a complex, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O,<br />
ridleyi complex. O. schlechteri does not belong to <strong>an</strong>y of these complexes.<br />
O, schlechteri was thought to be extinct but was recently recollected by<br />
Vaugh<strong>an</strong> (1994) from Papua New Guinea. The genomes of O. schlechteri<br />
are not known.<br />
1. O. sativa complex; This complex includes two cultigens, O. sativa<br />
(indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica rices) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. galberrima (Afric<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice),<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> six wild species. O. sativa is grown worldwide while O. glaberrima is<br />
limited to tropical West Africa. All species have 2n = 24 chromosomes<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong> A A genome (Table 13.1).<br />
2. O. officinalis complex: This is the largest complex in the genus. It is<br />
composed of ten species. Five species are diploid (2n = 24), four<br />
tetraploid (2n - 48), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one (O. punctata) contains both diploid <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
tetraploid cytotypes (Table 13.1). Tetraploid species are allotetraploids.<br />
The species of this complex are distributed in Asia, Africa, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Latin<br />
America. All species from South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Central America are tetraploid<br />
with CCDD genomes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tetraploid species from Asia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Africa carry<br />
BBCC genomes (Table 13.1).<br />
3. O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a complex: The O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a complex consists of O.<br />
gr<strong>an</strong>úlala <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 0 . meyeri<strong>an</strong>a. Both species have 2n = 14 chromosomes. Of<br />
the two, O. gr<strong>an</strong>úlala is widely distributed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thrives in South Asia,<br />
Southeast Asia, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> south western China while O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a is<br />
distributed in South east Asia. The O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a complex also includes<br />
the recently named taxon Oryza ind<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>am<strong>an</strong>ica Ellis from Rutl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Isl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
in the Andam<strong>an</strong>s. However, Vaugh<strong>an</strong> (1994) considered A Oryza<br />
ind<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>am<strong>an</strong>ica @ <strong>an</strong> isolated population of O. gr<strong>an</strong>úlala. This observation
R.J. Singh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S, Khush 289<br />
Table 13.1<br />
Chromosome number, genomic composition <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> potential<br />
useful traits of Oryza species (Khush, 1997).<br />
Species 2n Genome Distribution Useful or potentially useful traits*<br />
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)<br />
l.O. sativa complex<br />
0 . satim L. 24 AA Worldwide Gültigen<br />
0 . nivara Sharma 24 AA Tropical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sub- Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to grassy stunt<br />
etShastry tropical Asia virus, blast, drought<br />
avoid<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
0. rufipogon Griff. 24 AA Tropical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sub- Elongation ability, resist<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />
tropical Asia BB, source of CMS<br />
0 . breviligutata 24 A W Africa Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to GLH, BB, drought<br />
A. Chev. et Roehr. avoid<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
0 . glaberrima Steud. 24 West Africa Gültigen<br />
0. longistaminata 24 ASAS Africa Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BB, drought<br />
A. Chev. et Roehr. avoid<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
0 , meridimalis Ng 24 A^^A"' Tropical Australia Elongation ability, drought<br />
avoid<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
0. glumaepatula 24 ASP ASP South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Central Elongation ability, source<br />
Steud.<br />
America<br />
of CMS<br />
II. O. offidnalis<br />
complex<br />
0 . punctata 24 BB Africa Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH<br />
Kotschy ex Steud. 48 BBCC Zigzag leafhopper<br />
0 . minuta J.S. Presl. 48 BBCC Philippine <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to sheath blight.<br />
exC.B.Presi.<br />
Papua New Guinea BB, BPH, GLH<br />
0 . officinalis 24 CC Tropial <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sub- Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to thrips,<br />
Wall ex Watt tropical Asia BPH,GLH,WBPH<br />
0 , rhizomaiis 24 CC Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka brought avoid<strong>an</strong>ce,<br />
Vaugh<strong>an</strong><br />
rhizomatous<br />
O. eichingeri 24 CC South Asia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to yellow mottle<br />
A. Peter East Africa virus,<br />
BPH,WBPH,GLH<br />
0 . latifolia Desv. 48 CCDD South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Central Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH, high<br />
America<br />
biomass production<br />
O. alta Swollen 48 CCDD South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Central Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to striped stem<br />
America<br />
borer, high biomass production<br />
O. gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis 48 CCDD South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cenh'al I ligh biomass production<br />
(Doell) Prod.<br />
America<br />
O, australiensis 24 EE Tropical Australia Drought avoid<strong>an</strong>ce, resist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Domin<br />
to BPH<br />
0 . brachy<strong>an</strong>tha 24 PF Africa Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to yellow stem<br />
A. Chev. et Roehr. borer.<br />
Leaf folder, whorl maggot,<br />
toler<strong>an</strong>ce to laterite soil<br />
in. O.meyeti<strong>an</strong>a<br />
complex<br />
O. gr<strong>an</strong>ulata 24 GG South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shade toler<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />
Ness et Southeast adaptation to<br />
Arn.ex Walt Asia aerobic soil<br />
0 . meyeri<strong>an</strong>a 24 GG Southeast Asia Shade toler<strong>an</strong>ce, adaptation to<br />
(Zoll, et Mor. ex<br />
Steud.) Baill.<br />
aerobic soil<br />
(Confd.)
290 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Table 13.1 Contd.<br />
Species 2n Genome Distribution Useful or potentially useful traits*<br />
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)<br />
IV. O. ridleyi<br />
complex<br />
0 . longiglumis 48 HHJJ Iri<strong>an</strong> Jaya, Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to blast, BB<br />
J<strong>an</strong>sen<br />
Indonesia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Papua New Guinea<br />
O. ridleyi Hook. HHJJ South Asia Resist<strong>an</strong>ce to stem borer, whorl -<br />
f.48 maggot, blast, BB<br />
Genome not known<br />
O. schlechteri 48 Not Papua New Stoloniferous<br />
Pilger known Guinea<br />
* EPH ; brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper; GLH ; green leafhopper; WBPH : white-backed pl<strong>an</strong>thopper;<br />
BB : bacterial blight; CMS : cytoplasmic male sterility,<br />
If MH<br />
is supported by Aggarwal et al. (1997) from molecular studies. They<br />
demonstrated that O, meyeri<strong>an</strong>a, O, gr<strong>an</strong>ulata <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. ind<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>am<strong>an</strong>ica have<br />
a similar genome <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> have been assigned the genome symbol GG.<br />
4. Oryza ridleyi complex: This complex contains O. longiglumis <strong>an</strong><br />
O, ridleyi. These two species are allotetraploid. O. longiglumis is found in<br />
Iri<strong>an</strong> Jaya, Indonesia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Papua New Guinea while O. ridleyi is<br />
distributed in South Asia (Table 13.1). Taxonomically, the two species<br />
are almost similar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> clearly distinct from other species of the genus.<br />
Based on total genpmic DNA hybridization, Aggarwal et al. (1997)<br />
proposed a new genome symbol, HHJJ, for species of the O. ridleyi<br />
complex.<br />
Phylogenetic relationships among diploid <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tetraploid species of<br />
the genus Oryza, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genome designations based on classical taxonomy<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cyto<strong>genetics</strong> are being verified by isozyme b<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing patterns<br />
(Second, 1982), nuclear RFLPs (W<strong>an</strong>g et al, 1992), total genomic DNA<br />
hybridization (Aggarwal et ah, 1997), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> simple sequence repeats (Chen<br />
et ah, 1997).<br />
ORIGIN OF CULTIVATED RICES<br />
The genus Oryza originated in the <strong>an</strong>cient Gondw<strong>an</strong>al<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> supercontinent<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> consequent to continental drift became widely distributed in<br />
the humid tropics of Asia, Africa, South America, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Oce<strong>an</strong>ia (Ch<strong>an</strong>g,<br />
1976; 1985). Wild <strong>an</strong>nual O. nivara, derived from O. rufipogon, is<br />
considered the progenitor of O. sativa. O. glaherrima was domesticated<br />
from the wild armual. O. breviligulata in West Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is referred to as<br />
the Afric<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice.<br />
It is evident that cultivated rice was derived through <strong>an</strong> evolutionary<br />
process following the order wild perennial {wild <strong>an</strong>nual}<br />
cultivated <strong>an</strong>nual (Harl<strong>an</strong>, 1965). Figure 13.1 shows the evolutionary
R.J. Singh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. Khush 291<br />
.Gondw<strong>an</strong>a l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Common <strong>an</strong>cestor<br />
South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia<br />
Wild perennial<br />
Wild <strong>an</strong>nual<br />
O. aifipogon<br />
i<br />
0. nivara<br />
Gültigen 0. sativa O. satíva<br />
indica japónica<br />
temperate<br />
tropical<br />
Fig. 13.1<br />
Diagrammatic representation of the spéciation of the two cultivated rices<br />
(from Khush, 1997).<br />
pathiyays of the two taïionomically distinct cultivated species of rice.<br />
Indica-Japonica hybrids are partially sterile due to genic imbal<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
(Bouharmont et al, 1985). The progenitor of Asiatic rices is O. nivara <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
the Fi hybrids between O. nivara <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. sativa show essentially normal<br />
chromosome pairing <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> seed fertility (Dolores et al, 1979).<br />
O. glaberrima <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its progenitor O. breviligulata are less diverse th<strong>an</strong><br />
their Asi<strong>an</strong> counterparts (Ch<strong>an</strong>g, 1976). Based on isozyme<br />
polymorphism. Second (1982) proposed that O. glaberrima was<br />
domesticated independent of O. sativa. Asiatic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Afric<strong>an</strong> cultivated<br />
rices <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their wild <strong>an</strong>cestors carry similar genomes (Table 13,1).<br />
KARYOMORPHOLOGY<br />
Numerous attempts have been made to characterize individual<br />
chromosoines of rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to prepare <strong>an</strong> idiogram by using somatic<br />
metaphase chromosomes. Hu (1964) measured chromosomes from 2 1<br />
mitotic metaphase haploid cells. Chromosome length r<strong>an</strong>ged from 4.32<br />
m (Chromosome 1) to 1.79 (¡tm (Chromosome 12). Somatic mitotic<br />
metaphase chromosomes of rice are not well defined <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lack
292 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
I<br />
M<br />
morphologically distinguishing l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>marks. It is not possible to identify<br />
all members of the chromosome complément of rice except nucleolus<br />
org<strong>an</strong>izer chromosomes.<br />
Shastry et al. (1960) examined the entire chromosome complement<br />
of Japónica rice cv. Norin- 6 at the pachynema. They were able to<br />
distinguish 1 2 pachytene bivalents based on total length, arm ratio, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
presence or absence of dark-staining heterochormatic chrqmomeres.<br />
Chromosomes were arr<strong>an</strong>ged in the descending order of their length,<br />
with the longest (79.0 (pm) as chromosome 1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the shortest (18.0
R.J. Singh j<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. Khush 293<br />
primary trisomics {2n = 2x + 1 - 25) were helpful in delimiting the<br />
position of centromeres, A global uniform chromosome numbering<br />
system for rice was accepted by the <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics Cooperative during<br />
the Second International <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics Symposium held at the<br />
International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (IRRI), Las B<strong>an</strong>os^, Philippines in<br />
May 1990 (Khush <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh, 1991).<br />
Based on cytological observations <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a physical map of the rDNA<br />
loci, the chromosomes of O. sätiva <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O, glaherrima <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> almost identical<br />
(Ohmido, 1995; Ohmido <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fukui, 1995). Fukui et al. (1994) reported 2<br />
rDNA loci (NOR) in tropical rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one rDNA locus in rice from the<br />
temperate regions.<br />
ANEUPLOIDY<br />
Primary Trisomics<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> primary trisomics contain a normal chromosome complement plus<br />
<strong>an</strong> extra complete chromosome (2n = 2x + 1 = 25). Primary trisomics<br />
have been used extensively for determination of gene-linkage group<br />
relationships in several pl<strong>an</strong>t species (Burnham, 1962; Khush, 1973;<br />
Singh, 1993).<br />
,(i) O r ig in o p p r im a r y t r is o m ic s<br />
Several attempts have been made to generate primary trisomics in rice<br />
from the progenies of autotriploids (2ti ~3x = 36) (Hu, 1968; Wat<strong>an</strong>abe ef<br />
al., 1969; Khush et aL, 1984). However, a complete set of all possible<br />
primary trisomics was produced only by Khush et al, (1984) in the Indica<br />
rice cv. IR 36 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> by Iwata <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Omura (1984) in the Japónica rice cv.<br />
Nipponbare. Of the 92 seeds harvested from <strong>an</strong> autotriploid pl<strong>an</strong>t,<br />
Khush et al. (1984) recovered 72 pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Twenty pl<strong>an</strong>ts were primary<br />
trisomics {2n - 25), pl<strong>an</strong>ts double trisomics (2n = 26) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the remaining<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts segregated for 2n = 24 (2 pl<strong>an</strong>ts), 2n = 27 (14 pl<strong>an</strong>ts), 2n = 28 ( 8<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 2n 29 (3 pl<strong>an</strong>ts) chromosomes. Thus, pl<strong>an</strong>ts with 2n = 25<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 26 predominated in the progenies of rice autotriploid <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
maximum number of extra chromosomes tolerated by the rice is six.<br />
Therefore, the toler<strong>an</strong>ce limited for the extra chromosomes in rice is<br />
narrow as very few pl<strong>an</strong>ts with more th<strong>an</strong> four extra chromosomes were<br />
produced (Khush et al, 1984). This may be due to the fact that male <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
female spores or zygotes or embryos with more th<strong>an</strong> three extra<br />
chromosomes abort in the progenies of autotriploid of the diploid<br />
species because duplication of extra genetic material causes genetic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
physiological imbal<strong>an</strong>ce. It has been observed that the initial phase of
294 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
ii ' '■<br />
seed development is normal in autotriploids^r but the endosperm shrivels<br />
after a week, resulting in the death of the embryos. The failure in<br />
endosperm development is caused by <strong>an</strong> extremely unbal<strong>an</strong>ced<br />
chromosome number <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> this is the most likely expl<strong>an</strong>ation for the high<br />
frequency of occurrence pl<strong>an</strong>ts with 2s: + 1, + 2, 2x + 3, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 2x + 4<br />
chromosomes in the progenies of autotriploids of diploid species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
lack of pl<strong>an</strong>ts with a higher chromosome number (Singh 1993).<br />
Ishiki (1991) isolated 8 of the possible 12 primary trisomics in O,<br />
glaberrima from the progenies of <strong>an</strong> artificially synthesized autotriploid.<br />
Primary trisomics of O. glaberrima were morphologically similar to the<br />
primary trisomics of O. sativa,<br />
(II) M o r p h o l o g ic a l id e n t if ic a t io n o f p r im a r y t r is o m ic s<br />
1^ »<br />
Primary trisomics in indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica rices differ from their normal<br />
diploid sibs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> also from each other in several distinctive<br />
iporphological traits (Iwata et ah, 1970; Khush et ah, 1984). The<br />
distinguishing morphological features of each rice trisomics established<br />
in the Indica rice cv. IR36 are as follows:<br />
Triplo 1 Grassy, short height; narrow <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thin pale green leaves; late<br />
flowering; narrow <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tri<strong>an</strong>gular grains; low fertility.<br />
Triplo 2 Short height, few tillers; short dark green thick <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> twisted<br />
leaves; short p<strong>an</strong>icles; empty glumes; depressed palea; short<br />
<strong>an</strong>thers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reduced filament; highly self-sterile but produces<br />
abund<strong>an</strong>t seed when pollinated with a diploid.<br />
Triplo 3 Short height; slow growth, reduced tiller numbers; short,<br />
dark green <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thick leathery leaves; incompletely exerted<br />
p<strong>an</strong>icles; late flowering; highly male <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> female sterile.<br />
Triplo 4 Tall height (taller th<strong>an</strong> all of the other primary trisomics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
also diploid sibs); long <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> droppy light green leaves; long<br />
ligule; lax p<strong>an</strong>icles; high seed fertility.<br />
Triplo 5 Short height; short twisted leaves with fine hairs; short ligule;<br />
short compact p<strong>an</strong>icles; high seed fertility.<br />
Triplo 6 Short height; thick sernirolled dark green leaves; long ligule;<br />
early flowering; lax <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> awned p<strong>an</strong>icles; partially sterile.<br />
Triplo 7 Narrow, dark green <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sernirolled leaves with short ligule;<br />
incompletely exserted <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> somewhat lax p<strong>an</strong>icles; long tip<br />
awned grains.<br />
Triplo 8 Narrow, dark green, rolled leaves; short height, dense <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
fully exserted p<strong>an</strong>icles; short <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bold grains; partial seed<br />
fertility.<br />
Triplo 9 Spreading growth habit; dark green leaves; thick stems;<br />
largest p<strong>an</strong>icles among the primary trisomics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the highest<br />
1 0 0 -grain weight.
R J. Singh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. Khush 295<br />
Triplo 10 Fine foliage <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stems at flowering stage; erect leaves with<br />
hairy auricles; slender grains; completely fertile;<br />
distinguishable only after flowering.<br />
Triplo 11 Morphologically similar to a diploid, but at booting stage<br />
. pl<strong>an</strong>ts are slightly golden colored; hull gold color.<br />
Triplo 12 Bushy; m<strong>an</strong>y tillers; pale green; lax p<strong>an</strong>icle; degenerated<br />
florets at tip of p<strong>an</strong>icles; long grains; self-fertile.<br />
(ill) C y t o l o g ic a l id e n t if ic a t io n o f p r im a r y t r is o m ic s<br />
Primary trisomics of rice were identified <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> designated based on<br />
pachytene chromosome <strong>an</strong>alysis (Khush et ah, 1984) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mitotic<br />
metaphase chromosome karyotype (Kurata, 1986). The three homologous<br />
chromosomes in primary trisomics compete to pair with one<br />
<strong>an</strong>other, but only two by two pairing is observed. The third one attempts<br />
to associate with the paired homologues in a r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om m<strong>an</strong>ner <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> may<br />
form a loose trivalent configuration or pairs with itself (Fig. 13.2). In rice,<br />
the primary trisomic with chromosome 1 in triplicate was called triplo 1 ,<br />
that having <strong>an</strong> extra chromosome 2 was called triplo 2, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> so on (Table<br />
13.2).<br />
Table 13.2<br />
Present status of <strong>an</strong>euploid stocks in rice (Khush et al,<br />
1984; Singh et al., 1996b)<br />
Primary trisomics Secondary trisomics Telotrisomics<br />
Triplo 1 2n + IS = IS; 2tt + lL = lL 2n + mlS<br />
Triplo 2 2m+ 2S = 2S; 2n + 2L = 2L 2n+ = 2L<br />
Triplo 3<br />
2n + = 3L<br />
Triplo 4<br />
2ji + 4S = 4S<br />
Triplo 5 2w + 5S s 5S 2n + s 5L<br />
Triplo 6 2« + 6S = 6S; 2« + 6L = 6L<br />
Triplo? 2n + 7S = 7S; 2« +7L^7L<br />
Triplo 8 2n+8L = 8L 2n + s8S<br />
Triplo 9 2w + 9L = 9L 2n + = 9S<br />
Triplo 10<br />
2n + = 10S<br />
Triplo 11 2n -i l l S s l l S ; 2n + 11L = 11L<br />
Triplo 12<br />
2n + 12S s 12S<br />
(IV) T r a n s m is s io n o f t h e e x t r a c h r o m o s o m e<br />
Theoretically, about 50% primary trisomic pl<strong>an</strong>ts are expected in the<br />
progenies of primary trisomics when used as a female. However, such a<br />
proportion is rarely observed (Khush, 1973; Singh, 1993). The<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>smission rates of extra chromosomes of the primary trisomics<br />
through the female in rice are high (Khush et al, 1984). They r<strong>an</strong>ge from<br />
15.5% (triple 1) to 43.9% (triple 4). Male tr<strong>an</strong>smission of the extra<br />
chromosome was recorded in 7 of 12 primary trisomics that r<strong>an</strong>ged
296 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
from 0.5% (triplo 4) to 27.3% (triplo 9). The longer chromosomes of the<br />
rice complement did not tr<strong>an</strong>smit through the mate gametes. Perhaps<br />
they cause greater physiological <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic imbal<strong>an</strong>ce on the male side.<br />
ThuS/ the behaviour of the primary trisomics of rice is similar to that<br />
observed in several diploid species such as tomato^, barley, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> maize<br />
(Khush, 1973; Singh, 1993).<br />
(V) P r im a r y t r is o m ic s in r ic e l in k a g e m a p p in g<br />
Primary trisomics are powerful cytogenetic tools for locating a gene on a<br />
particular chromosome, verifying the independence of linkage groups,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for associating the genetic linkage groups with individual<br />
chromosomes (Burnham, 1962; Hermsen, 1970; Khush, 1973; Singh,<br />
1993). When a primary trisomic is used to locate a gene on a particular<br />
chromosome, the genetic ratios are modified from 3:1 (F2) or 1:1<br />
(BCi).The ratios depend on the genotypes of the F| primary trisomic<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts [whether duplex (AAa) or simplex (Aaa)], on the type of<br />
segregation (r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om chromosome or r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om chromatid), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> on the<br />
female tr<strong>an</strong>smission rate of the extra chromosome (50% or 33.3%).<br />
The expected phenotypic frequencies in <strong>an</strong> F2 population, assuming<br />
50% female tr<strong>an</strong>smission of the extra chromosome, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> duplex genotype<br />
of the F^, would be 17:1 [9:0 (2x + 1):: 8:1 (2^:)] instead of 3:1. however,<br />
the expected 50% female tr<strong>an</strong>smission of n + 1 gametes is not usually<br />
observed. If we assume the female tr<strong>an</strong>smission of the extra<br />
chromosome as 33.3%, the overall phenotypic ratio is modified from<br />
17:1 to 12.5:1.<br />
Associations between chromosomes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> linkage groups through<br />
primary trisomic <strong>an</strong>alysis is in rice were established by Iwata <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Omura (1975, 1976; 1984), Iwata et al. (1984), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush et at (1984).<br />
Iwata <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Omura (1976) associated three linkage groups of Nagao <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Takahashi (1963) with one chromosome by using primary trisomics.<br />
Khush et al. (1984) examined 120 combinations involving 22 genes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
12 primary trisomics. They located marker genes for each of the 12<br />
chromosomes. Subsequently, several morphological rharkers (Librojo<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1986; Iwata et al., 1984; S<strong>an</strong>chez <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1994), isozyme<br />
markers (R<strong>an</strong>jh<strong>an</strong> et al., 1988; Wu et al, 1988), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> RFLP markers<br />
(McCouch et al, 1988) were assigned to saturate the linkage maps of rice<br />
(Fig. 13.3).<br />
Kamisugi et al. (1994) physically localized 5S rDNA locus on<br />
chromosome 11 of Japónica rice cv. > Nipponbare=. The location differs<br />
in Indica rice. W<strong>an</strong>g et al. (1995b) located repetitive DNA sequence in the<br />
heterochromatic region of the long arm of chromosome 5 by fluorescence<br />
in situ hybridization.
R.J. Singh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. Khush 297<br />
Secondaxy Trisomies <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Telotrisomics<br />
In secondary trisomies, the extra chromosome is <strong>an</strong> isochrornosome<br />
(both arms are homologous, e.g. secondary chromosome). In the<br />
telotrisomics, the extra chromosome is a telocentric chromosome. A<br />
telocentric chromosome consists of a centromere <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one complete arm<br />
of a normal chromosome.<br />
(I) O r ig in o f s e c o n d a r y a n d t e l o t r is o m ic s<br />
Secondary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> telotrisomics are produced as a result of misdivision of<br />
the univalent. The probability of misdivision of univalent in primary<br />
trisomies in higher because m<strong>an</strong>y sporocytes contain <strong>an</strong> extra chromosome<br />
as a univalent. The frequency of secondary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> telotrisomics in the<br />
progenies of primary trisomies of rice is shown in Table 13.3. Singh et al.<br />
(1996a) isolated 15 secondary trisomies <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 7 telotrisomics. Secondary<br />
trisomies in rice for both arms of chromosomes 1, 2 , 6 , 7, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 11 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> for<br />
only one arm of chromosomes 4, 5, 8 , 9, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 1 2 were isolated.<br />
Telotrisomics in rice for 2L, 3L, 5L, IS, 8 S, 9S, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lOS were identified<br />
(Table 13.3.).<br />
Table 13.3<br />
Frequency of secondary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> telotrisomics in the progenies of primary<br />
trisomies (Singh et ai, 1996 a).<br />
Trisomic<br />
Total<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts<br />
grown<br />
Secondary trisomic<br />
Short arm<br />
(No.)<br />
Long arm<br />
(No.)<br />
Short arm<br />
■ (No.)<br />
Telotrisomic<br />
Long arm<br />
(No.)<br />
Frequency<br />
Triplo 1® 1 1<br />
lb<br />
0<br />
Triplo 2 1632 2 1*’ 0 1 0.18<br />
Triplo 3“ 0 0 0 1<br />
Triplo 4 1812 1 0 0 0 0.05 "<br />
Triplo 5 1536 1 0 0 1 0.13<br />
Triplo 6 2112 3 1 0 . 0 0.19<br />
Triplo 7 3300 2 1 0 0 0.09<br />
Triplo 8 1608 0 3 1 0 0.25<br />
Triplo 9 2127 0 3 1 0 0.19*<br />
Triplo 10 1776 0 0 1 0 0.06 ’<br />
Triplo 11 600 1 1 0 1 0.50<br />
Triplo 12 1632 2 0 0 0 0.12<br />
** Triple 1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> triplo 3 are highly sterile <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> large populations could not be grown. 2n + IS ■<br />
IS <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 2n + IL •IL <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ■3L were selected from progenies of primary trisomics before<br />
conscientious efforts were made to isolate secondary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> telotrisomics<br />
Telotrisomic 2n + ■IS was isolated from the progeny of 2n + IS •IS <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> secondary trisomic<br />
2n + 2L •2L was isolated from the progeny of 2« + ■2L.<br />
(%)
298 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
(II) M o r p h o l o g ic a l id e n t if ic a t io n o f s e c o n d a r y a n d t e l o t r is o m ic s<br />
In general/ secondary trisomics expressed slower vegetative growth rate<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lower seed fertility th<strong>an</strong> the corresponding primary trisomics.<br />
However/ they resembled their counterpart primary trisomics in<br />
morphological traits (Singh et al., 1996a). Some of the morphological<br />
traits of primaries were exaggerated in secondary trisomicS/ particularly<br />
those for long arm. Secondary trisomics for short arms were generally<br />
vigorous <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> were fertile. Secondary trisomics for IS <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 2S were<br />
exceptions. They were weak <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> slow in vegetative growth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pollen<br />
fertility r<strong>an</strong>ged from 11% for the secondary trisomic for IS to 16.8% for<br />
the secondary trisomic for 2S. Secondary trisomics for 4S <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IIS were<br />
like diploid sibs.<br />
Telotrisomics were vigorous <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fertile compared to their counterpart<br />
primaries <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> secondaries (Singh et al., 1996a). Telotrisomics for<br />
5L, 8 S/ 9S, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lOS exhibited normal pollen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> seed fertility while<br />
Telotrisomics for 2L <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 3L showed partial pollen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> seed fertility.<br />
Pollen fertility in telotrisomic 2L was 54% <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> seed set after selfing<br />
r<strong>an</strong>ged from 15”20%. Telotrisomic 3L had 78% pollen fertility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 30-<br />
40% seed set upon selfing.<br />
(III) C y t o l o g ic a l id e n t if ic a t io n o f s e c o n d a r y a n d t e l o t r is o m ic s<br />
Secondary trisomics were first identified cytologically at diakinesis. The<br />
occurrence of a ring configuration suggests that the extra chromosome is<br />
<strong>an</strong> isochromosome. The frequency of ring trivalent r<strong>an</strong>ged from 0.5%<br />
(2 n + 4S = 4S) to 25.6% {2x + 8 L = 8 L). Usually/ secondary trisomics for<br />
the long arms showed higher frequency of ring trivalents th<strong>an</strong> those for<br />
secondary trisomics for the short arms (Singh et al., 1996a). In secondary<br />
trisomics, the isochromosome c<strong>an</strong> pair internally <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> remain as a<br />
univalent or pair with the homologous arms of the two normal<br />
chromosomes to form a Y-shaped trivalent. Pachytene trivalent<br />
configurations of secondary trisomics facilitated the precise location of<br />
centromeres. The centromere position of ten chromosomes was verified<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chromosome 6 was found to be more metacentric <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chromosome<br />
12 was observed to be submetacentric. A revision of pachytene idiogram<br />
for chromosomes 6 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 12 was suggested (Singh et ah, 1996a).<br />
In telotrisomics, sporocytes with 1211 + II predominated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> r<strong>an</strong>ged<br />
from 49% {2n + s 2L) to 87% (2n + ^ 9S). The frequency of llll + IIII<br />
r<strong>an</strong>ged from 13% (2n + s 9S) to 45.9% {2n + = 2L). The telotrisomics for<br />
the long arm formed trivalents at a higher frequency th<strong>an</strong> telotrisomics<br />
for the short arms. Telocentric chromosomes were more difficult to<br />
identify at the pachynema th<strong>an</strong> isochromosomes (Singh et al., 1996a),
RJ. Singh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. IChush 299<br />
(iv) T r a n s m is s io n r a t e s o f t h e e x t r a c h r o m o s o m e in s e c o n d a r y a n d<br />
TELOTRISOMICS<br />
The female tr<strong>an</strong>smission rates of extra isochromosomes in selfed<br />
progenies of secondary trisomics r<strong>an</strong>ged from 8.1% (2n + IS = IS) to<br />
47.3% (2« + 4S = 4S). Related primary trisomics appeared in the<br />
progenies of secondary trisomics. Their frequency r<strong>an</strong>ged from 1.4% (2«<br />
+ IS E IS) to 2,07% {2n + 8 L = 8 L). Male tr<strong>an</strong>smission of isochromosomes<br />
was recorded only in 2« + 4S = 4S (Singh et at, 1996a),<br />
Female tr<strong>an</strong>smission of the extra telocentric chromosome in selfed<br />
progenies r<strong>an</strong>ged from 28.6% (2« + e 2L) to 47.5% (2n + = 9S), higher<br />
th<strong>an</strong> the tr<strong>an</strong>smission rates of isochromosomes (Singh et al., 1996a), As<br />
expected, the tr<strong>an</strong>smission rates of telocentric chromosomes for the<br />
short arms were higher th<strong>an</strong> those for the long arms. Male tr<strong>an</strong>smission<br />
of the telocentric = 8 S was 12% <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that of s 9S was 20%.<br />
(v) Lo c a t io n o f t h e g e n e s o n c h r o m o s o m e a r m s<br />
Secondary trisomics c<strong>an</strong> be used to locate genes on a particular<br />
chromosome arm in much the same way as the primary trisomics. If a<br />
gene is located in the extra chromosome arm, a ratio of 3:1 :: all :0 is<br />
observed in F2 for diploid <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> secondary trisomic fractions. Thus no<br />
recessive homozygous pl<strong>an</strong>ts are obtained in the secondary trisomic<br />
fraction. In the progenies of telotrisomics on the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, teiotrisomic<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts with recessive phenotype c<strong>an</strong> be obtained.<br />
Segregation of 43 marker genes belonging to 11 linkage groups of<br />
rice was studied in the progenies of secondary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> telotrisomics (Singh<br />
et al., 1996a). The same marker gene was crossed with the secondary<br />
trisomics for both arms to determine arm location of the gene. For<br />
example, four morphological markers (z-1 , v-A, la, z2 ) were used in<br />
genetic studies with the secondary trisomics for chromosome IIS <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
IIL. The F2 segregation ratios conclusively demonstrated that marker<br />
genes v~4, la, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Z2 are located on IIL <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> z-1 on IIS (Table 13.4).<br />
Segregation data of secondary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> telotrisomics facilitated location<br />
of genes on specific chromosome arms <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> helped determine the<br />
centromere position on 8 linkage groups <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> orientation of 1 0 linkage<br />
groups of rice. The relationships between (from left to right) the<br />
pachytene idiogram or rice, molecular linkage map, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> classical map<br />
'are shown in Fig, 13.3. (Khush et al., 1996). Singh el al. (1996b) assigned<br />
more th<strong>an</strong> 170 RFLP markers to a specific arm of a chromosome by using<br />
secondary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> telotrisomics through gene dosage <strong>an</strong>alysis. The<br />
orientation of seven linkage groups was reserved to fit the > short arm<br />
on top-convention.
300 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges
1 . 1<br />
¡■!<br />
R J. Singh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. Khush 301<br />
Chromosomal Interch<strong>an</strong>ges<br />
A series of reciprocal tr<strong>an</strong>slocation lines have been produced <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
utilized for genetic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> linkage studies in rice (Nishimura, 1961;<br />
Yoshimura et al., 1982; Sato <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shinjyo, 1995). Chung <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Wu (1994)<br />
identified chromosomes involved in 1 1 of Nishimura=s tr<strong>an</strong>slocation<br />
lines through pachytene <strong>an</strong>alysis. Nonomura et al. (1997) used<br />
chromosomal interch<strong>an</strong>ges of rice to determine the orientation of RFLP<br />
linkage groups on pachytene chromosomes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the assignment of 113<br />
RFLP markers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 4 cloned rice genes to chromosome arms.<br />
I !<br />
Monosomies, Aneuhaploids, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tetrasomies<br />
In a monosomie pl<strong>an</strong>t, one complete chromosome is missing from the<br />
normal chromosome complement. Seshu <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Venkataswamy (1958)<br />
isolated a monosomie pl<strong>an</strong>t (2n = 2x - 1 = 23) in rice from the progenies<br />
of indica x japónica hybrids. The monosomie pl<strong>an</strong>t was weak <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
progenies (45 pl<strong>an</strong>ts) from this pl<strong>an</strong>t were normal <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> diploid. W<strong>an</strong>g et<br />
al. (1991) produced monosomies by using gamma-ray irradiated pollen.<br />
In addition, they identified pl<strong>an</strong>ts with 2n = 23 + If (fragment), + 2f, + 3f.<br />
They used induced deficiencies to locate genes at a particular region of<br />
the rice chromosome.<br />
Aneuhaploid pl<strong>an</strong>ts contain <strong>an</strong> extra chromosome in addition to<br />
haploid chromosome complement. W<strong>an</strong>g <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Iwata (1991, 1995)<br />
produced eight <strong>an</strong>euhaploids from the <strong>an</strong>ther culture of primary<br />
trisomies of rice cv. > Nipponbare=. These <strong>an</strong>euhaploids were for<br />
chromosomes 4, 5, 6 , 8 , 9, 10,11, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 1 2 . Morphologically, <strong>an</strong>euhaploid<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts resembled their counterpart primary trisomies. At metaphase I,<br />
chromosome pairing in monosomie pl<strong>an</strong>ts was mostly III + III or 131.<br />
A tetrasomie individual contains a normal chromosome<br />
complement plus a pair of homologous chromosomes. W<strong>an</strong>g et al.<br />
(1995a) isolated eight tetrasomies (2n = 26) for chromosomes 4, 5, 6 , 7, 8 ,<br />
9, 10, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 12 from the <strong>an</strong>ther culture of primary trisomies of rice. The<br />
morphological features of’ these tetrasomies were similar to their<br />
corresponding primary trisomies. The extra chromosomes caused a<br />
greater genetic imbal<strong>an</strong>ce in haploids th<strong>an</strong> those observed in diploids:<br />
More th<strong>an</strong> 80% of the sporocytes in tetrasomies showed llll + 1 IV<br />
Pollen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> seed fertility in tetrasomies is low <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thus their use in<br />
cytogenetic studies in limited. RFLP <strong>an</strong>alysis verified the morphological<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cytological identity of the <strong>an</strong>euhaploids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tetrasomies (W<strong>an</strong>g et<br />
al., 1995b).
----RGlQJl<br />
JtQyii '<br />
RG944<br />
SPf3|<br />
-;<br />
(i><br />
5'<br />
aq £Us<br />
o<br />
fD<br />
3 OS<br />
■RZ3B4,<br />
. RZ58?‘<br />
. R7;^9a<br />
-■“ RZ57G'<br />
■RZIR<br />
RZ403<br />
. ftZT4&<br />
- ftI575<br />
p 'fe<br />
i-ED<br />
fl><br />
^3<br />
AiafG H)<br />
3<br />
a<br />
n<br />
3*<br />
fT<br />
3<br />
CfQ fD<br />
Fig-1 3 3<br />
Relationships between (from left to right) the pachytene idiogram of rice, the molecular linkage map, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the classical map. Positions<br />
of the kinetochores are indicated by Os on the idiogram, dark areas on the molecular linkage map, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> C on classical map.<br />
Relationships between the molecular <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> morphological markers, where known, are indicated by dashed lines. (Khush e t a h , 1996),<br />
. J7Z91G<br />
•RZ5SB<br />
' ftn44<br />
' 1^3 i<br />
10-2<br />
|cW4|<br />
7^<br />
to<br />
5'<br />
u<br />
3<br />
a<br />
O<br />
in<br />
3cn<br />
ir<br />
w<br />
o<br />
w
304 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
S'<br />
K<br />
a<br />
Í3<br />
5 Í I'S Í
R.J. Singh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. Khush 305<br />
C4<br />
u<br />
bO<br />
IS
306 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Monosomic Alien Addition Lines<br />
The wild relatives of cultigens are used as sources of abiotic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> biotic<br />
stresses for crop improvement. This is accomplished by producing a<br />
complete series of monosomic alien addition lines (MAALs). Earlier<br />
attempts for producing wide crosses in rice ended at the Fj stage.<br />
Shastry <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> R<strong>an</strong>ga Rao (1961) produced sterile hybrids between O.<br />
sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O, australiensis, Seed sterility was due to extremely low<br />
meiotic chromosome pairing at metaphase I. They proposed that sterility<br />
was due to timing imbal<strong>an</strong>ce between chromosomes of the parents.<br />
Shastry et at, (1961) also produced <strong>an</strong> interspecific hybrid between O.<br />
sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. officinalis. Pachytene chromosome pairing revealed a loose<br />
association, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 58.5% sporocytes at diakinesis showed 24 univalents.<br />
Attempts were not made to produce amphiploids in order to restore the<br />
seed fertility. Failure to produce a large number of wide crosses in the<br />
genus Oryza is due to prefertilization incompatibility (Sitch <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Romero<br />
1990).<br />
Shin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Katayama (1979) crossed a synthesized autotetraploid O.<br />
sativa {In - 4x - 48; genome AAAA) with O. officinalis {In = = 24; CC).<br />
The allotriploid {In = 3x = 36; AAC) was backcrossed to O. sativa. The<br />
selfed progenies of pl<strong>an</strong>ts with 2« = 26 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 27 produced pl<strong>an</strong>ts with 2n =<br />
25 chromosome (MAALs). They grouped 82 twenty-five chromosome<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts into 1 2 morphologically distinct types. Meiotic chromosome<br />
pairing at metaphase t revealed a low frequency (0 - 1 ) of trivalent<br />
configuration while 1211 + II configuration was most common.<br />
Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush (1989) also produced MAALs from <strong>an</strong> interspecific<br />
hybrid between O. sativa {In = 2x - 24; AA) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. officinalis (2 m = 2x ~<br />
24; CC). They rescued Fj ( 2 m = 2x = 24; AC) pl<strong>an</strong>ts through in vitro<br />
procedures. The crossability rate r<strong>an</strong>ged from 1.0% to 2.3%. The method<br />
of isolating MAALs with a single chromosome of O. offwinalis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
complete chromosome complement of O. sativa is shown in Fig. 13.4.<br />
Table 13.5 shows chromosome segregation among the BC2 progeny.<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>ts with 2x + 2, 3, 4, 5, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 6 were highly sterile <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> were greatly<br />
modified morphologically. Twelve morphologically distinct types of<br />
MAALs were isolated. These MAALs expressed striking resembl<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />
the O. sativa primary trisomics. This suggests that the O. officinalis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
O. sativa chromosomes have similar gene content <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> have homologous<br />
genomes (Khush <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh, 1991). Chromosome association in MAALs<br />
was primarily 1211 + 11. Three sporcocytes of MAAL 3 showed 1 III + IIII<br />
configuration. Female tr<strong>an</strong>smission rates r<strong>an</strong>ged from 6 .6 % to 26.8% <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
male tr<strong>an</strong>smission rate was observed for MAALs 6 , 9,10, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 12. They<br />
isolated diploid lines with brown pl<strong>an</strong>thopper resist<strong>an</strong>ce (BPH). Jena et<br />
al. (1992) examined 52 BC2 p8 introgression lines using 174 RFLP markers
R J. Singh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G,S. Khush 307<br />
0. sativa<br />
(AA)<br />
X 0, officinalis<br />
(CC)<br />
Embryo rescue<br />
F i X O. sativa<br />
(AC) (AA)<br />
BCi X 0. sativa<br />
(AAC) (AA)<br />
i<br />
BCj (AA + 1C, AA + 2C .... AA + 6C)<br />
i<br />
Monosomic alien addition lines<br />
Fig. 13.4<br />
Scheme used to isolate monosomic alien addition lines with a single<br />
chromosome of Oryza officinalis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> complete chromosome complement of O.<br />
sativa. 0ena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1989).<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> identified 28 putative O. officinalis introgressed chromosome<br />
segments. These segments were found in 11 of the 12 rice chromosomes.<br />
Multara et al (1994) isolated,, by using the procedure, of Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Khush (1989), 8(MAAL-1, A, -B, -7, -9, -10, -11, -12) of the possible 12<br />
MAALs containing one chromosome of O, australiensis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a complete<br />
chromosome complement of O. sativa. The MAALs resembled morphologically<br />
the primary trisomics of O. sativa. The alien chromosome<br />
associated with the O. sativa chromosome in a trivalent configuration in<br />
all MAALs. The frequency of trivalent association at metaphase I r<strong>an</strong>ged<br />
from 7,5% (MAAL-4) to 18.5% (MAAL-12). The female tr<strong>an</strong>smission of<br />
alien chromosome r<strong>an</strong>ged from 4,2% (MAAL^l) to 37.2% (MAAL-12).<br />
Male tr<strong>an</strong>smission of alien chromosome was recorded in MÁAL-5<br />
(1 .2 %), -9(3.2%), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> -12(2.4%). They screened 600 BC2 F4 progenies for<br />
resist<strong>an</strong>ce to BPH <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bacterial blight (BB). Four lines were resist<strong>an</strong>t to<br />
BPH <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one line was resist<strong>an</strong>t to Race 6 of BB.
308<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Table 13.5<br />
Chromosome number in BC, progeny of O. sativa x O. offtcinalis (Jena<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1989).<br />
Chromosome no. No. of pl<strong>an</strong>ts (%)<br />
24 25 (26.6)<br />
25 40 (42.5)<br />
26 11 (11.7)<br />
27 10 (10.6)<br />
28 4 (4.3)<br />
29 3 (3.2)<br />
30 1 (1.1)<br />
Total 94 (100.0)<br />
References<br />
Aggarwal, R.K., Brar, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S., 1997. Two new genomes in the Oryza complex<br />
identified on the basis of molecular divergence <strong>an</strong>alysis using total genomic DNA<br />
, hybridization, Mol. Gen, Genet. 254:1-12.<br />
Benneth M.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Leitch, I.J. 1997. Nuclear DNA amounts in <strong>an</strong>giosperms—583 new<br />
estimates. Ann. Bot. 80:169-196.<br />
Bouharmont, J., Olivier, M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Dumonte de Chassart, M. 1985. Cytological observations in<br />
some hybrids between the rice species Oryza sativa L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. glaberrima Steud, Euphytica<br />
34: 75-81.<br />
Burnham, C.R. 1962. Discussion in Cyto<strong>genetics</strong>. Burgess, Minneapolis, MN.<br />
Ch<strong>an</strong>g, T.T, 1976. The origin, evolution, cultivation, dissemination, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> diversification of<br />
Asi<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Afric<strong>an</strong> rices. EiUphytica 25:425-441.<br />
Ch<strong>an</strong>g, T.T. 1985. Crop history <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic conservation: <strong>Rice</strong>—a case study, him State]. Res.<br />
59; 425-455.<br />
Chen, X., Temnykh, S., Xu, Y., Cho, Y.G. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> McCouch, S.R. 1997. Development of a<br />
microsatellite framework map providing genome-wide coverage in rice {Oryza sativa L.).<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 95; 553-567.<br />
Chung, M.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Wu, H.K. 1994. Cytological identification of the chromosomes involved in<br />
rice tr<strong>an</strong>slocation lines, Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:956-964.<br />
Dolores, R.C., Ch<strong>an</strong>g, T.T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ramirez, D.A. 1979. The cyto<strong>genetics</strong> of Fj hybrids from Oryza<br />
nivara Sharma et Shastry x O. sativa L. Cytologia, 44:527-540.<br />
FAO. 1997. Year Book. Production 19%, 51:52-64..<br />
Fukui, K., Ohmido, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1994. Variability in rDNA loci in the genus Oryza<br />
detected through fluorescence in situ hybridization. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87:893-899.<br />
Harl<strong>an</strong>, J.R. 1965. The possible role of weed races in the evolution of cultivated pl<strong>an</strong>ts.<br />
Euphytica 14:173-176.<br />
Hermsen, J.G. Th. 1970. Basic information for the use of primary trisomics in genetic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
<strong>breeding</strong> <strong>research</strong>. Euphytica 19:125-140.<br />
Hu, C.H. 1964. Further studies on the chromosome morphology of Oryza sativa. In: <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genetics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cyto<strong>genetics</strong>. Elsevier, pp. 51-61.<br />
Hu, C.H. 1968. Studies on the development of twelve types of trisomics in rice with reference<br />
to genetic study <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>breeding</strong> programme. /. Agric. Assoc. China (N.S.) 63: 53-71 (in<br />
Chinese with English summary).<br />
Ishiki, K. 1991. Cytogenetical studies on Afric<strong>an</strong> rice, Oryza glaberrima Steud, 3. Primary<br />
trisomics produced by pollinating autotriploid with diploid. Euphytica 55; 7-13.
"Tí<br />
RJ. Singh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. Khush 309<br />
Iwata, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Omura, T. 1975. Studies on the trisomics in rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts (Oryza sativa L.), III.<br />
Relation between trisomics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic linkage groups. }pn. /. Breed. 25:363-368.<br />
Iwata, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Omura, T. 1976. Studies on the trisomics in rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts (Oryza sativa L.), IV. On<br />
the possibility of association of three linkage groups with one chromosome./pn. J. Genet.<br />
51: 135-137.<br />
Iwata, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Omura, T. 1984. Studies on the trisomics in rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts (Oryza satmaL.), VI. An<br />
accomplishment of a trisomic series in Japónica rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Jpn. J. Genet. 59:199-204,<br />
Iwata, N., Omura, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nakagahra, M. 1970. Studies on the trisomics in rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts {Oryza<br />
satim L.), 1. Morphological classification of trisomics. Jpn. /. Breed. 20; 230-236.<br />
Iwata, N., Satoh, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Omura, T, 1984. Relationship between the twelve chromosomes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
the linkage groups (Studies on the trisomics in rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts {Oryza sativaL.), V, Jpn. J. Breed.<br />
34: 314-31.<br />
Izawa, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shimamoto, K. 1996. Becoming a model pl<strong>an</strong>t: the import<strong>an</strong>ce of rice to pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />
science. Trends Pl<strong>an</strong>t Sei. 1:95-99.<br />
Jena, K.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rhush, G.S. 1989. Monosomie alien addition lines of rice: production,<br />
morphology, cytology, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>breeding</strong> behaviour. Genome, 32:449-455.<br />
Jena, K.K., Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kochert, G. 1992. RFLP <strong>an</strong>alysis of rice {Oryza sativa L.)<br />
introgression lines. Theor, Appl. Genet. 84: 608-616.<br />
Kamisugi, Y., Nakayama, S., Nakijima, R., Ohtsubo, H., Ohtsubo, E. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fukui, K. 1994.<br />
Physical mapping of the 5S ribosomal RNA genes on rice chromosome 11. Mol. Gen.<br />
Ge«ei. 245:133-138. .<br />
Katayama, t . 1977. Cytogénetical studies on the genus Oryza, IX. The F^ hybrids from<br />
synthesized amphiploid x species with the BBCC genomes. Jpn, /. Genet. 52:301-307.<br />
Katayama, T. 1995. Cytogenetical studies on the genus Oryza, XIV. Intergeneric<br />
hybridizations betwene tetraploid Oryza species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> diploid teersia species. Jpn. J. Genet.<br />
70: 47-55.<br />
Katayama, T. 1997. Cytogenetical studies on the genus Oryza, IX. The F^ hybrids from<br />
synthesized amphiploid x species with the BBCC genomes. Jpn. J. Genet. 52:301-307<br />
Katayama, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ogawa, T. 1974. Cytogenetical studies on the genus Oryza, VII.<br />
Cytogenetical studies on Fj hybrids between diploid O. punctata <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> diploid species<br />
having C genome. Jpn. J. Breed. 24:165-168.<br />
Katyama, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Onizuka, W., 1978. Dihaploid-BC pl<strong>an</strong>ts produced in F^ pl<strong>an</strong>ts between<br />
synthesized amphiploid (BBCC) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> diploid (BB)-or tetraploid (BBCC)-Ofyzfl punctata<br />
Kotschy ex Steud. Jpn. J. Genet. 53: 67-70.<br />
Katyama, T., Shin, T.B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Onizuka, W. 1977. Cytogenetical studies on the genus Oryza, X.<br />
Cyto<strong>genetics</strong> of tetraploid Fj pl<strong>an</strong>t between amphiploid punctata-eichingeri <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> BBCC<br />
genome species. J. Fflc. Agrie. Kyushw Unit». 22; 99-105.<br />
Khush, G.S. 1973. Cyto<strong>genetics</strong> ofAnmploids. Acad. Press, NY London.<br />
Khush, G.S. 1975. <strong>Rice</strong> In: H<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>book of Genetics. R.C. King (ed.). Plenum Press, Vol. 2, pp. 31-<br />
58.<br />
Khush, G.S. 1997. Origin, dispersal, cultivation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> variation of rice. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Mol. Bioh 35:25-<br />
34.<br />
Khush, G.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh, R.J. 1991. Chromosome architecture <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>euploidy in rice. In:<br />
Chromosome Engineering in Pl<strong>an</strong>ts: Genetics, Breeding, Evolution. Part A, P. K. Gupta, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T.<br />
Tsuchiya (eds.). Developments in Pl<strong>an</strong>t Genetics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>breeding</strong>, 2A. Elsevier Science B.V.,<br />
pp. 577-598.<br />
Khush, G.S., Singh, R.J. Sur, S.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Librojo, A.L. 1984. Primary trisomics of rice: Origin,<br />
morphology, cytology, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> use in linkage mapping. Genetics 107; 141-163.<br />
Khush, G.S., Singh, K., Ishii, T., Parco, A., Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N., Brar, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mult<strong>an</strong>i, D.S. 1996.<br />
Centromere mapping <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> orientation of the cytological, classical, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> molecular linkage<br />
map of rice. In; <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>genetics</strong>. III. G.S. Khush (ed.). IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippine pp. 57-75.
310 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Kurata, N. 1986. Chromosome <strong>an</strong>alysis of mitosis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> meiosis in ricé. In: Ríce Genetics. Isl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Publ. House, Inc., M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 143-152.<br />
Kurata, N., Omura, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Iwata, N. 1981. Studies on centromere, chromomere <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nucleolus<br />
in pachytene nuclei of rice, Oryza sativa, microsporocytes. Cytologia 46: 791-800.<br />
Librojo, A.L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1986. Chromosomal location of some mut<strong>an</strong>t genes through the<br />
use of primary trisomics in rice. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics. Isl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Publ. House, Inc., M<strong>an</strong>ila,<br />
Philippines, pp. 249-255.<br />
McCouch, S.R., Kochert, G., Vu, Z.H., W<strong>an</strong>g, Z,Y., Khush, G.S., Coffm<strong>an</strong>, W.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ksley,<br />
S.D. 1988. Molecular mapping of rice chromosomes. Theor. Appl, Gmet. 76:815-829.<br />
Mult<strong>an</strong>i, D.S., Jena, K.K., Brar, D.S., de los Reyes, B.G., Angeles, E.R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1994.<br />
Development of monosomic alien addition lines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> introgression of genes from Orym<br />
australiensis Domin. to cultivated rice O, sativa L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:102-109.<br />
Nagao, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Takahashi, M. 1963. Trial construction of twelve linkage groups in Jap<strong>an</strong>ese<br />
rice (Genetical studies on rice pl<strong>an</strong>t, XXVIIJ. Tacul. Agrie. Hokkaido Univ., Sapporo. 53:72-<br />
130.<br />
Nayar, N.M. 1973. Origin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cyto<strong>genetics</strong> of rice. Adv. Genet. 17:153-292.<br />
Nezu, M ,,, Katayama, T.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kihara, H. 1960. Genetic study of the genus Otyza. I.<br />
Crossability <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chromosomal affinity among 17 species. Seiken Ztho, 11:1-11.<br />
Ñishimura, Y. 1961. Studies on the reciprocal tr<strong>an</strong>slocations in rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> barley. Bull. Natl.<br />
Inst. Agrie. Sei. Ser. D 9:171-235 (In Jap<strong>an</strong>ese with English summary).<br />
Nonomura, K,, Yoshimura, A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Iwata, N. 1997. Cytogenetical gene mapping by reciprocal<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>slocation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tertiary trisomic <strong>an</strong>alysis in rice {Oryza sativa L.). Genes Genet. Syst. 72:<br />
41-49.<br />
Ogawa, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Katayama, T. 1973. Cytogenetical studies on the genus Oryza, VI.<br />
Chromosome pairing in the interspecific hybrids between O. officinalis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its related<br />
diploid species. Jpn. J. Genet. 48:159-165.<br />
Ogawa, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Katayama, T.1974. Cytogenetical studies on the genus Oryza. Chromosome<br />
pairing in the interspecific hyrbid between diploid O. punctata <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. officinalis Jpn. J.<br />
Genet. 49; 257-260.<br />
Ohmido, N. 1995. Ricé chromosomes studies by fluorescence in situ hybridization with<br />
special reference to physical mapping <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chromosome structure./. F«c. Agrie. Holáaido<br />
Univ. 66: 277-320.<br />
Ohmido, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fukui, K. 1995, Cytological studies of Afric<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice, Oryza<br />
glaberrima. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91:212-217.<br />
Oka, H. 1964. Pattern of interspecific relationships <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> evolutionary dynamis in Oryza. In:<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Genetics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cyto<strong>genetics</strong>. Elsevier, pp. 71-90.<br />
R<strong>an</strong>jh<strong>an</strong>, S., Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n, J.C., Ramirez, D.A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1988. Chromosomal location of<br />
four isozyme loci by trisomic <strong>an</strong>alysis in rice {Oryza sativa L ). Theor. Appl. Genet. 75:541-<br />
545.<br />
Senchez, A.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1994. Chromosomal location of some marker genes in rice<br />
using the primary trisomics. /. Hered. 85: 297-300.<br />
Sato, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shinjyo, C. 1995. Identification of earliness genes derived from 15 reciprocal<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>slocation homozygotes of rice, Oryza sativa L. fpn.}. Breed. 45:45^9.<br />
Second, G. 1982. Origin of the genic diversity of cultivated rice (Oryza spp.)'. study of the<br />
polymorphism scored at 40 isozyme loci. Jpn.}. Genet. 57:25-57.<br />
Seshu, D.V. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Venkataswamy, T. 1958. A monosomic in rice. Madras Agic, J. 45:311-314.<br />
Shastry, S.V.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> R<strong>an</strong>ga Rao, D.R. 1961. Timing imbal<strong>an</strong>ce in the meiosis of the Fj hybrid<br />
Oryza sativa x O. australiensis. Genet. Res. Cambridge 2:373-383.<br />
Shastry, S.V.S., R<strong>an</strong>ga Rao, D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Misra, R.N. 1960. Pachytene <strong>an</strong>alysis in Oryza, I.<br />
Chromosome morphology In Oryza sativa. Indi<strong>an</strong> J. Genet, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pl<strong>an</strong>t Breed. 20:15-21.
RJ. Singh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> G.S. Khush 311<br />
Shastry, S.V.S., Sharma, S.D, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> R<strong>an</strong>ga Rao, D.R. 1961. Pachytene <strong>an</strong>alysis in Oryza^ III.<br />
Meiosis in <strong>an</strong> inter-sectional hybrid, O. sativa xO. officinalis, The Nucleus, 4: 67-^0.<br />
Shin, Y.B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Katayama, T. 1979. Cytogenetical studies on the genus Oryza. XI. Alien<br />
addition lines of O. sativa with single chromosomes of O. officinalis. }pn. J. Genet 54:1-10.<br />
Singh, K., Mult<strong>an</strong>i, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1996a. Secondary trisomics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> telotrisomics of rice:<br />
Origin, characterization, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> use in determining orientation of the chromosome map.<br />
Genetics 143:517-529.<br />
Singh, K., Ishii, T., Parco, A., Hu<strong>an</strong>g, N., Brar, D.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1996b. Centromere<br />
mapping <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> orientation of the molecular linkage map of rice (Oryza sativaL.), Proc. Natl.<br />
Acad. Sci. USA 93: 6163-6168.<br />
Singh, R.J. 1993. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Cyto<strong>genetics</strong>, CRC Press; Inc., Boca Raton, PL.<br />
Sitch, L. A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Romero, G .0 .1990. Attempts to overcome prefertilization incompatibility in<br />
interspecific <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> integeneric crosses involving Oryza sativa L. Genome 33: 321-327.<br />
Vaugh<strong>an</strong>, D.A. 1994. The Wild Relatives of <strong>Rice</strong> (A Genetic Resources H<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>book). IRRI,<br />
M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, Z.X. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Iwata, N. 1991. Production of n + 1 pl<strong>an</strong>ts <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tetrasomics by me<strong>an</strong>s of<br />
<strong>an</strong>ther culture of trisomic pl<strong>an</strong>ts in rice (Oryzii sativa L.). Theor, Appl. Genet. 83; 12-16.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, Z.X. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Iwata, N. 1995. Aneuploids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tetrasomics in rice (OryzasativaL.) derived<br />
from <strong>an</strong>ther culture of trisomics. Genome 38:696-705.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, Z.Y., Second, G. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D. 1992. Polymorphism <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> phylogenetic<br />
relationships among species in the genus Oryza as determined by <strong>an</strong>alysis of nuclear<br />
RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:565-581.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, Z.X., Iwata, N., Sukekiyo, Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Yoshimura, A. 1991. Induction of chromosome<br />
aberr<strong>an</strong>ts in rice (Oryza sativaL.) by using irradiated pollen./. Fac. Agrie. Kyushu Univ. 36:<br />
99-108.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, Z.X., Ideta, O., Yoshimura, A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Iwata, N. 1995a. Ideritification of extra<br />
chromosomes of <strong>an</strong>euhaploids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tetrasomics in rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> use of these <strong>an</strong>euploids in<br />
genome <strong>an</strong>alysis. Breed. Sci. 45: 327-330.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, Z.X., Kurata, N., Saji, S., Katayose, Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Minobe, Y. 1995b. A chromosome 5-specific<br />
repetitive DMA sequence in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet 90:907-913.<br />
Wat<strong>an</strong>abe, Y., Ono, S., Mukai, Y, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Koga, Y. 1969. Genetic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cytogenetic studies on the<br />
trisomic pl<strong>an</strong>ts of rice, Oryza sativa. L., I. On the autotriploid pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its progenies, Jpn.<br />
J. Breed. 19:12-18.<br />
Wu, K.S,, Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n, J.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1988. Chromosomal location of ten isozyme loci<br />
in rice (Oryza sativa L.) through trisomic <strong>an</strong>alysis, Biochem. Genet. 26:303-320.<br />
Yoshimura, A., Iwata, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Omura, T, 1982. Linkage <strong>an</strong>alysis by reciprocal tr<strong>an</strong>slocation<br />
method in rice pl<strong>an</strong>ts (Oryza sativa L,), III. Marker genes located on chromosomses 2,3,4,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 7. jpn }, Breed. 32: 323-332.<br />
Yu, Z.H., McCouch, S.R., Kinoshita, T., Sato, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ksley, S.D. 1995. Association of<br />
morphological <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> RFLP markers in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genome 38:566-574.
14<br />
Species of Genus Oryza <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Their Interrelationships<br />
S.D. Sharma^, S.R. Dhua^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> P.K. Agrawal^<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The genus Orym belongs to the family Poaceae, tribe Oryzeae. The genus<br />
is characterized by the presence of two rudimentary glumes in the<br />
pedicel below the point of articulation, two sterile lemmas (generally<br />
small) above the point of articulation (absent in perrieri, tissermti <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
<strong>an</strong>qustifolia), a single tough fertile lemma having five vascular bundles<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ending in <strong>an</strong> awn (awn absent in O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in m<strong>an</strong>y cultivars<br />
of saliva), a palea having three vascular bundles but similar in shape <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
texture to that of fertile lemma, six stamens <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a bifid feathery stigma<br />
(Tateoka, 1962a). Based on these criteria, Oryza coarctata was excluded<br />
from the genus Oryza (Tateoka, 1962a; Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry, 1966). Later<br />
Launert (1965) excluded O. perrieri, O, Hsser<strong>an</strong>ti <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. aiigustifolia from<br />
the genus but, following Tateoka (1962a), we have included these three<br />
species in the genus Oryza.<br />
Monographs on the genus Oryza have been written by Prodoehl<br />
(1992), Roschevicz (1931), Chevalier (1932) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vaugh<strong>an</strong> (1994). The<br />
monograph written by Roschevicz (1931) is the most comprehensive <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
that by Vaugh<strong>an</strong> (1994) the most recent. The species of the genus Oryza<br />
M.S. Swaminath<strong>an</strong> Research Foundation, Chennai 600113.<br />
^ Central <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, Cuttack 753 006.
314 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
have been enumerated by Tateoka (1963), Ch<strong>an</strong>g ((1985), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vaugh<strong>an</strong><br />
(1994).<br />
TAXONOMY OF GENUS OKYZA<br />
The genus Oryza consists of about 26 species. The exact number of<br />
species is highly subjective <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> differs from author to author. The<br />
species are distributed in the tropical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subtropical regions of the<br />
world. They are either hydrophytes growing in open sunshine or<br />
mesophytes adapted to moist soil <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> growing in partial shade. They<br />
are either diploid (2n = 24) or tetraploid {In = 48), forming bivalents only<br />
at meiotic metaphase-I. A list of Oryza species following Tateoka (1963),<br />
Ch<strong>an</strong>g (1985) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vaugh<strong>an</strong> (1994) with slight modification (as discussed<br />
later) is presented in the Appendix.<br />
Classification<br />
The species of Oryza were grouped into sections by Roschevicz (1931)<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chevalier (1932). Later, Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry (1965c) classified the<br />
genus into three sections <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nine series, which were later reduced to<br />
only eight by Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sampath (1985)' Recently, Vaugh<strong>an</strong> (1994) has<br />
grouped the species into species complexes, which more or less<br />
correspond with our series. In this review, Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry's (1965c)<br />
classification as given below has been followed. (The figures in<br />
parentheses indicate the number of species in that series).<br />
Section<br />
Oryza<br />
Angustifolia<br />
Padia<br />
Classification of genus Oryza<br />
Series<br />
Sativae (8)<br />
Latifoliae (10)<br />
Brachy<strong>an</strong>thae (2)<br />
Perrieri<strong>an</strong>ae (2)<br />
Meyeri<strong>an</strong>ae (4)<br />
Ridley<strong>an</strong>ae (2)<br />
Schlechteri<strong>an</strong>ae (1)<br />
Representative Species<br />
O. sativa<br />
O. latifoHa<br />
O. brachy<strong>an</strong>tha<br />
O. perrieri<br />
O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a<br />
O. ridleyi<br />
O. schlechteri<br />
SÈC T . O r y z a<br />
The species of this section form the largest group in the genus <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are<br />
distributed in the tropics of the Old as well as the New World. This<br />
section has been divided into two series, viz. Ser. Sativae <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ser.<br />
Latifoliae.
S.D. Sliarma e t a l. 315<br />
Ser. sativa<br />
This group is represented by two cultivated species^, tiamely/ O. sativa of<br />
South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. glaberrima of western Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their<br />
wild relatives. The Asi<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice; O, sativa, is now widely<br />
distributed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is cultivated in all the rice-growing areas of the world<br />
including the homel<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> of O. glaberrima.<br />
In Asia; the series is represented by a perennial wild species (O.<br />
rufipogon), <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>nual wild species (O. nivara), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the cultivated species<br />
(O. sativa). In addition, hybrids between the cultivated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the two wild<br />
species also occur in nature <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are commonly referred to as O, sativa f.<br />
spont<strong>an</strong>ea. A brief description of these taxa is given below.<br />
O, rufipogon: a procumbent pl<strong>an</strong>t spreading on the ground <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
br<strong>an</strong>ching at internodes. It grows up to 3 m long in swamps. When the<br />
water level rises, the br<strong>an</strong>ches remain suspended in water. The p<strong>an</strong>icle<br />
emerges above the surface of water with a long exsertion. The<br />
inflorescence is a p<strong>an</strong>icle with lax primary br<strong>an</strong>ches, which bear a few<br />
secondary br<strong>an</strong>ches. The spikeiets are long, slender, with flexuous awns.<br />
The <strong>an</strong>thers are long <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> completely fill the spikeiets. The stigma is<br />
generally purple in color <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> protrudes out of the lemma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> palea after<br />
<strong>an</strong>thesis. It is a photosensitive species flowering during November/<br />
December. It is widely distributed from India <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka to southern<br />
China, Vietnam, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Indonesia. It grows in coastal lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s,<br />
particularly in deltaic areas of rivers of these countries.<br />
O. nivara: <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>nual species with semierect habit, growing generally<br />
to a height of less th<strong>an</strong> a meter. It grows in seasonal pools or in the<br />
margins of t<strong>an</strong>ks up to a depth of 0.5 m of water. The p<strong>an</strong>icle is poorly<br />
exserted or even partly inserted in the sheath of the flag leaf. When<br />
compared with O. rufipogon, the p<strong>an</strong>icle has short primary br<strong>an</strong>ches <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
bolder spikeiets. Awns are longer, bolder, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stiffer th<strong>an</strong> its perennial<br />
counterpart. It is a photoperiod insensitive species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> flowers during<br />
August to October. It is specially adapted to the plateau regions of India,<br />
My<strong>an</strong>mar, Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> southern China.<br />
In Australia, the <strong>an</strong>nual wild species, O. meridionalis, is distributed<br />
in the tropical areas. It is a tall, erect species growing in seasonal ditches<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pools of water.<br />
O. sativa: The cultivated species originally grown in South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Southeast Asia but now in cultivated in all continents of the world<br />
(except Antarctica). It is <strong>an</strong> armual species but has potential to perennate.<br />
The main feature that distinguishes this species from the wild rices is<br />
that the spikeiets of the former do not shatter after maturity. The<br />
additional characters are synchronous flowering of all the tillers, higher<br />
number of spikeiets per p<strong>an</strong>icle, variation in color (straw, brown.
316 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
golden^ etc.) of the lemma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> palea especially after maturity, often lack<br />
of awns, white pericarp, etc.<br />
O. sativa t spont<strong>an</strong>ea: The wild rices that grow in cultivated fields<br />
resemble cultivated species except that the spikelets shatter at maturity.<br />
The additional characters that may or may not be present are black husk,<br />
awn, red pericarp, etc. These spont<strong>an</strong>ea rices are "wild" in the sense that<br />
they shed their spikelets on maturity. Biosystematically, these are the<br />
result of introgression of rufipogon or nivara genes into O. sativa. Eradication<br />
of these spont<strong>an</strong>ea rices poses a problem for the farmers because of<br />
their close resembl<strong>an</strong>ce to cultivated rices, especially at the vegetative<br />
stage.<br />
The Afric<strong>an</strong> continent provides more or less a parallel situation.<br />
There are three species: one perennial, one <strong>an</strong>nual, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one cultivated.<br />
Besides, there are wild forms that resemble the Afric<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice<br />
O. glaberrima, often segregate on selfing <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hence c<strong>an</strong>not be assigned to<br />
<strong>an</strong>y taxonornic status. The perennial wild rice of Africa {longistaminata)<br />
rarely takes part in the natural hybridization with the Afric<strong>an</strong> cultivated<br />
rice {galberrima) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, in this sense, the Afric<strong>an</strong> situation differs from the<br />
Asi<strong>an</strong> one. A brief morphological description of the three Afric<strong>an</strong> species<br />
is provided below.<br />
O. longistaminata is a stoloniferous pl<strong>an</strong>t with erect habit. The ligule<br />
is long, pointed, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bifid as in O. rufipogon. The spikelets are long <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
slender <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the <strong>an</strong>thers fill the spikelets very well. It is generally<br />
assumed that the species has developed a self-incompatibility system. It<br />
is widely distributed throughout tropical Africa including Madagascar<br />
where it grows in perennial swamps,<br />
O. harthii (syn. O. hreviligulata) is a pl<strong>an</strong>t of medium height <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
bushy habits. The spikelets <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> awns of this species are the longest in the<br />
genus. The armual wild species, O. barthii, is confined to the northern<br />
part of tropical Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is distributed from Senegal to Sud<strong>an</strong>.<br />
O. glaberrima is the cultivated species of rice in Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is<br />
characterized by a glabrous leaf <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lemma palea. It is distinguished<br />
from O. sativa by a papery obtuse ligule <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lack of secondary br<strong>an</strong>ching<br />
of the p<strong>an</strong>icle. This cultivated species (glaberrima) is grown from Sierra<br />
Leone <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Senegal to Cameroon. In recent years, the Asi<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice<br />
O. sativa has been replacing. O. glaberrima because of better agronomic<br />
adaptability <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> yielding potential of the former.<br />
O. glaberrima f. stapfii is the result of introgression of barthii characters<br />
into O. glaberrima as the genetic barrier between the two species (barthii<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. glaberrima) is incomplete <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> natural hybridization between the<br />
two species does take place. These stapfii rices of Africa are similar to<br />
O. glaberrima but they shatter their spikelets on maturity. Besides, they<br />
have hairy spikelets, leaves, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> awns as seen in O. barthii.
S.D. Sharaia et ah 317<br />
The ligules of O, longistaminata are long, pointed, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bipartite as in<br />
the species of Ser. Satime of Asia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> America. This is <strong>an</strong> import<strong>an</strong>t<br />
taxonomic character <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, in this sense, the species is closer to the Asi<strong>an</strong><br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Americ<strong>an</strong> species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> distinctly different from the other two {barthii,<br />
glaberrima) Afric<strong>an</strong> species. In other words, among the Afric<strong>an</strong> elements,<br />
O. longistaminata does not seem to be as closely related to O. glaberrima<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. breviligulata since, in Asia, O. rufipogon is related to O' satim <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
O. nivara. Besides, O, longistaminata rarely takes part in natural hybridization<br />
with O. glaberrima <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, in this sense, differs from the Asi<strong>an</strong><br />
situation. Genomically. O. longistaminata represents a subgenome (A^A^)<br />
that differs from that (A^A®) of O. barthii <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. glaberrima.<br />
In America, a single species, O. glumaepetula, is widely distributed<br />
from Cuba to Paraguay.<br />
All the species of Ser. Sativae are diploid with 2n = 24 chromosomes<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the genomic constitution of all these species is the same (AA)<br />
though subgenomic differentiation within the genome has been<br />
recognized (Yeh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Henderson, 1961, 1962).<br />
Nomenclatural confusion<br />
The delimitation of species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hence the nomenclature of various taxa<br />
of Ser. Sativae have been debated subjects. The three perennial elements<br />
{rufipogon, longistaminata, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> glumaepetula) were earlier treated as three<br />
subspecies of a single species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> were identified as O, perennis subsp.<br />
halunga, O. perennis subsp. barthii <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. perennis subsp. cubensis<br />
respectively (IRRI, 1964a). Some authors consider the Americ<strong>an</strong> element<br />
(glumaegetula) a mere vari<strong>an</strong>t of O. rufipogon (Second, 1982). The name<br />
O. barthii was 'earlier mistakenly used for the perennial rice (O.<br />
longistaminata) until Clayton (1968) clarified that it is the correct name<br />
for the <strong>an</strong>nual wild rice (known earlier by the synonym O. briviligulata).<br />
The Australi<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>nual wild rice, O. meridionalis, was earlier treated as a<br />
vari<strong>an</strong>t of O. rufipogon (Morishima, 1984) or of O. nivara (Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Shastry, 1965a).<br />
Genetic barriers<br />
The genetic barrier among O. rufipogon, O. nivara <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. sativa is not<br />
complete. Natural hybridization takes place particularly between O.<br />
sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. rufipogon in coastal areas <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> between O. sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
nivara in plateau regions of South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia. This leads to<br />
introgressive hybridization <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of genes of one species into the<br />
other. The occurrence of introgressed forms in nature has blurred the<br />
distinction of these species leading to differences of opinion with regard<br />
to their delimitation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nomenclature.
318 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Similarly, the genetic barrier between O. glaberrima <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. barthii is<br />
incomplete <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hence natural hybridization between these two species<br />
in Africa has resulted in introgressive hybridization <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>sfer of<br />
genes of one species into the other. This has resulted in m<strong>an</strong>y<br />
intermediate forms <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> has obscured the distinction of these two<br />
species.<br />
O. saliva <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. glaberrima show m<strong>an</strong>y morphological similarities<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> parallel variation. However, the Fj hybrids between these two<br />
species are completely sterile O. meridionalis of Australia is genetically<br />
completely isolated from the other species of this group <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Fj<br />
hybrids of this species with other species of Ser. Sativae are completely<br />
sterile.<br />
The three pereimial species, O, rufipogon of Asia, O. longistaminata of<br />
Africa, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O, glumaepetula of America, were earlier treated as a single<br />
species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> identified as O. perennis following Chevalier (1932) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Chatterjee (1948). Of these, hybrids between O. longistaminata <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
other two species are completely sterile. On the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, the hybrid<br />
between O. rufipogon <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. glumaepetula is partially sterile <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hence<br />
some taxonomists merge the latter with the former.<br />
Ser. Latifoliae<br />
Ser,Latifoliae comprises eleven species, five of which are diploid (2 n =<br />
24) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> six tetraploid (2 n = 48). This group is distributed throughout the<br />
tropics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subtropic^ of the world <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> often adapted to partial shade of<br />
forests. A better underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing of this group has come from the study of<br />
their chromosome numbers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genomic constitutions. Despite the<br />
variation in their ploidy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genomic constitution, the morphology of<br />
species often overlaps, so much so that this whole group has been<br />
designated by Tateoka (1962b) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vaugh<strong>an</strong> (1994) as the O. latifolia<br />
complex. A brief description of the species of this group is provided<br />
below.<br />
Diploid species<br />
All the five diploid species of Ser. Latifoliae are distributed in Africa,<br />
Asia, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Australia only.<br />
O. officinalis is a large-sized pl<strong>an</strong>t with well-ramified p<strong>an</strong>icle. It is<br />
very similar to O. latifolia (<strong>an</strong> Americ<strong>an</strong> tetraploid species) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> was<br />
misidentified as O, latifolia until their ploidy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genome differences<br />
were established. It is widely distributed from the west coast of India to<br />
Indonesia. This species grows in partial shade in forests near water<br />
streams or in moist grounds.<br />
O. rhizomatis is known only from Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka. It was collected,<br />
described <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> so named by Vaugh<strong>an</strong> (1989). The only other species of
S.D. Sharaia et al. 319<br />
Ser. Latifoliae available in Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka is O. eichingeri. Compared to O.<br />
dchingeri of Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka, O. rhizomatis is taller vyith larger spikelets.<br />
Compare to O. officinalis (which it closely resembles), the spikelets are<br />
smaller (Vaugh<strong>an</strong>, 1989).<br />
O. eichingeri is a small-sized pl<strong>an</strong>t adapted to humid tropical forest<br />
of Ug<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka. It is the only species of Ser. Latifoliae that is<br />
distributed in two continents, Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Asia. The Asi<strong>an</strong> (Sri L<strong>an</strong>k<strong>an</strong>)<br />
form was available in living form from the early years of cytogenetic<br />
studies. The Afric<strong>an</strong> element was first collected from Ug<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a in living<br />
form in 1964 by Tateoka.<br />
O. punctata is <strong>an</strong>other diploid species of Ser. Latifoliae available in<br />
Africa. Its spikelet size is larger th<strong>an</strong> that of O. eichingeri. The pl<strong>an</strong>t is<br />
adapted to open habitat <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grows in seasonal ditches in Sud<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
adjoining Ethiopia. It was collected in living form for the first time by<br />
Tateoka (1964).<br />
O. australiensis is a tall pl<strong>an</strong>t with rhizomatous habit <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> has a wellramified<br />
p<strong>an</strong>icle. The spikelets are the largest in Ser. Latifoliae. This<br />
species is distributed in northern parts of Australia. It grows in open<br />
habitats in pools of water.<br />
Tetraploid species Asi<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Afric<strong>an</strong> (tetraploid) species: Three<br />
tetraploid species of Ser. Latifoliae are available in Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Asia. Of<br />
these, O. minuta is confined to the Philippines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. malampuzhaensis to<br />
southern India only. O. schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a is widely distributed in tropical<br />
Africa. The pl<strong>an</strong>t size, p<strong>an</strong>icle morphology <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> spikelet size <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> shape<br />
do not offer m<strong>an</strong>y distinctive features in the three species. All three<br />
species are tetraploid <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> have the same genomic constitution (BBCC).<br />
Americ<strong>an</strong> tetraploid species: O. latifolia, O. alta, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis<br />
are the only three species of Ser. Latifoliae available in the Americ<strong>an</strong><br />
continent. All the species are tetraploid (2 n = 48) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> have the same<br />
genomic constitution (CCDD). All the three species are tall, robust<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts with well-ramified p<strong>an</strong>icles. The three species are easily<br />
identifiable. O. latifolia has the shortest spikelet among the three. Of the<br />
latter two species, O. gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis has larger sterile lemmas covering<br />
almost the whole of the fertile lemma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> palea. However, the<br />
morphological characters of the three species overlap <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the genetic<br />
barrier among the three species is not complete. This has led some<br />
taxonomists to suggest that the three species should be merged into a<br />
single species. The distribution of O. gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis is confined to Brazil<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its adjacent areas, whereas O. latifolia spreads up to Mexico <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Cuba in the north <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> up to northern Argentina <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Paraguay in the<br />
south, O. alta has <strong>an</strong> intermediate distribution.
320 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
it I<br />
Nomenclatural confusion<br />
O. officinalis {2n = 24) was identified as O. latifolia {In = 48) by Hooker<br />
(1897) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> as O. minuta {In = 48) by Bor (1960). 0 . eichingeri of Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka<br />
was identified as "O. officinalis (Ceylon)" by Morinaga <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kuriyama<br />
(1959). It was treated as a separate species by Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry (1965)<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> named O. coltina. The correct identity of this Sri L<strong>an</strong>k<strong>an</strong> form as (O.<br />
eichingeri) was provided by Tateoka (1962a, 1963). This has been<br />
supported by Biswal <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sharma (1987) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vaugh<strong>an</strong> (1994). A vari<strong>an</strong>t<br />
of O. alia was wrongly referred to as O. paraguainensis by Morinaga <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Kuriyama (1960). Morinaga (1964) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Li <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> his associates (Li, 1964, Li<br />
et ah, 1961; Wuu et ah, 1963). O. schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a was misidentified as O,<br />
eichingeri by m<strong>an</strong>y cytogeneticists until Tateoka collected the correct<br />
material (O, eichingeri) from Ug<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> made it available to rice<br />
<strong>research</strong>ers. O. schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a {2n = 48) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. punctata {2n = 24) have<br />
been treated as two different species by Roschevicz (1931) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Andrews<br />
(1956) but Tateoka (1962) merged the former with the latter <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, to<br />
■differentiate them, referred to them as O. punctata {2x) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. punctata<br />
{4x). O. rmlampuzhaensis (2n = 48) has been treated as a subspecies of O.<br />
officinalis {2n = 24) by Tateoka (1962).<br />
Variation in Ser. LatifoUae<br />
Ser. LatifoUae provides^ much variation in size of pl<strong>an</strong>t, ligule characters,<br />
size <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> shape of p<strong>an</strong>icle, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> spikelets. In Ser, LatifoUae, O. eichingeri<br />
represents the smallest size of pl<strong>an</strong>t. Pl<strong>an</strong>t size is largest in O.<br />
australiensis, O. officinalis, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the three Americ<strong>an</strong> tetraploid species<br />
{latifolia, alta, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis).<br />
O. eichingeri grows in hot, humid atmosphere under forest shade in<br />
well-drained soils. O. officinalis grows in partial forest shade often near<br />
rurming streams. The ecological preference of all tetraploid species is<br />
more or less similar to that of O. officinalis. O. punctata <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
australiensis are adapted to open habitats.<br />
The ligules in all the species of Ser. LatifoUae are truncated. In the<br />
Americ<strong>an</strong> tetraploid species, the ligules are fringed <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hence this<br />
character works as <strong>an</strong> identifying character for these species.<br />
In O. officinalis, O. australiensis, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Americ<strong>an</strong> tetraploid species,<br />
the primary br<strong>an</strong>ches form a whorl at the base of the. p<strong>an</strong>icle <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
basal regions of the lowermost primary br<strong>an</strong>ches are naked. They do not<br />
bear a secondary br<strong>an</strong>ch.<br />
The spikelets of O. rhizomatis are characterized by a wash of purple<br />
pigmentation. This character works as <strong>an</strong> identifying character for this
S.D. Sharma et al. 32%<br />
species. In O. officinalis, the base of the sterile lemma is often pigmented^<br />
which helps in the identification of this species.<br />
The size of the spikelets is the largest in O, australiensis followed by<br />
that of O. punctata, O. gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. alia. The smallest spikelet<br />
size is seen in O. minuta <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O, eichingeri.<br />
Sect, Angustifoiia<br />
This section consists of four species, namely, O. brachy<strong>an</strong>iha, O.<br />
<strong>an</strong>gustifoiia, O, perrieri, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. tisser<strong>an</strong>ti. The section was divided into<br />
two series, namely, Ser. Brachy<strong>an</strong>thae <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ser. Pettiev<strong>an</strong>ae by Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Shastry (1965 c). All the species of this section belong to tropical Africa<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are small-sized pl<strong>an</strong>ts. Except O. brachy<strong>an</strong>iha, all the species are<br />
restricted to small localities only.<br />
Ser. Brachy<strong>an</strong>thae: O. brachy<strong>an</strong>iha is a small pl<strong>an</strong>t growing erect up to<br />
a height of 30-70 cm. The culm is slender <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leaves are 15-30 cm long<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 4-6 cm wide. The inflorescence is a racerrie, the spikelets are long<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cylindrical, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> awns up to 10 cm long, robust <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> scabrid, O.<br />
brachy<strong>an</strong>iha is widely distributed in the whole of tropical Africa from<br />
Senegal to Sud<strong>an</strong> in the north <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zambia in the south. It occurs in<br />
shallow ditches <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> margins of ponds in open habitat. It is a diploid (2n<br />
- 24) species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its genome (FF) is different from <strong>an</strong>y of the species of<br />
Sect. Oryz« (Li, 1964).<br />
O. <strong>an</strong>gustifoiia has not been available to rice <strong>research</strong>ers in living<br />
form. According to Launert (1965), it occurs in Ub<strong>an</strong>gi-Shari, Congo<br />
(Kat<strong>an</strong>ga), Kenya <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zambia (Kasama Dist.). Compared with O.<br />
brachy<strong>an</strong>iha, O. <strong>an</strong>gustifoiia has wider leaf blades, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chartaceous <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
flexuous awns. It lacks sterile lemmas.<br />
Ser. Perrieri<strong>an</strong>ae is represented by two species, O. perrieri <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
tisser<strong>an</strong>ti. Both species are perennial, slender, awned <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lack sterile<br />
lemmas. O. perrieri is geniculate <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> about 30 cm in height. It is occurs in<br />
the vicinity of Majunga lake in Madagascar. O. tisser<strong>an</strong>ti is comparatively<br />
taller, has a rigid culm, larger leaves <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more ramified p<strong>an</strong>icles. The<br />
spikelets are comparatively more cylindrical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> slightly longer. Both<br />
species are diploid with 2n = 24 chromosomes (Ch<strong>an</strong>g, 1985).<br />
Laurnet in 1965 rerrioved O. <strong>an</strong>gustifoiia, O. perrieri, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. tisser<strong>an</strong>ti<br />
from the genus Oryza <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> placed them in the genus Leersia mainly<br />
because they lacked sterile lemmas at the base of fertile lemma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
palea. This factor was duly considered by the original authors (Camus,<br />
1926; Chevalier, 1932; Hubbard, 1950) while placing them in the genus<br />
Oryza.
322 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Sect. Padia<br />
This is a Southeast Asi<strong>an</strong> group of species represented by perennial<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts often growing in shady habitats. This section comprises three<br />
series, namely, Ser. Meyeri<strong>an</strong>ae, Ser. Kidley<strong>an</strong>ae, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ser. Schlechteri<strong>an</strong>ae.<br />
Ser. Meyeri<strong>an</strong>ae is represented by four species (or subspecies of a<br />
single species?), O. abromeiti<strong>an</strong>a, O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. gr<strong>an</strong>ulata, which<br />
are very closely related. Tateoka (1962b) recognized a single species O.<br />
meyeri<strong>an</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> assigned subspecific r<strong>an</strong>ks to the three elements. They are<br />
all small pl<strong>an</strong>ts (< 1 m), prefer shady <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> moist habitat, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are<br />
distributed in South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia. All of them are diploid (2n -<br />
24). Recently, Ellis (1985) reported one more species, O. ind<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>am<strong>an</strong>ica<br />
from the Andam<strong>an</strong> Isl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s. It is suspected that O. ind<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>aminica is<br />
merely a vari<strong>an</strong>t of O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a sensu lato as recognized by Tateoka<br />
(1963).<br />
Ser. Ridley<strong>an</strong>ae consists of two species, namely, O. ridleyi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
longiglumis. Compared to O, meyeri<strong>an</strong>a, the two species are taller <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
grow in partial shade in Southeast Asia. The surface of their fertile<br />
lemma is smooth, the inflorescence is a p<strong>an</strong>icle, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the fertile lemma<br />
ends in <strong>an</strong> awn. The difference between these two species is mostly in<br />
qu<strong>an</strong>titative characters only. The latter expresses reduction is spikelet<br />
size, elongation of awns, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more setaceous nature of sterile lemmas.<br />
While the former is widely distributed in Southeast Asia from<br />
Tennasserim (My<strong>an</strong>mar) to New Guinea, the latter has been reported<br />
from New Guinea only.<br />
Ser. Schlechteri<strong>an</strong>ae is represented by a single species, O. schlechteri. It<br />
has been described in detail by Pilger (1914) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Roschevicz (1931).<br />
According to their description, O. schlechteri is a small pl<strong>an</strong>t, about 40<br />
cm tall. The spikelets are small (1.75 mm), awnless <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> have a smooth<br />
surface of fertile lemma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> palea. Recently, Vaugh<strong>an</strong> et al. (1991)<br />
collected this in living form from the bl<strong>an</strong>ks of the river Yamu in Papua<br />
New Guinea. It is a creeping, stoloniferous pl<strong>an</strong>t. It grows in partial or<br />
complete shade in mountains with primary forest cover.<br />
CYTOGENETIC APPROACHES TO SPECIES RELATIONSHIPS<br />
The species of Oryza are either diploid with 2n = 24 chromosomes<br />
forming 12 II or tetraploid with 2 « = 48 chromosomes forming 24 II at<br />
meiotic metaphase-I. The tetraploid species appear to be amphidiploids<br />
only as they form 24 II with hardly <strong>an</strong>y univalents, trivalents or<br />
quadrivalents. The chromosome numbers of all the Oryza species are<br />
provided in Table 14.1.
S.D. Sharma et ah 323<br />
Table 14.1<br />
Species of Oryza, their chromosome numbers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genomes.<br />
Species Chromosome number (2n) Genome<br />
0 . alta 48 CCDD<br />
0 . <strong>an</strong>gustifolia 24 not known<br />
0.au stralien sis 24 EE<br />
0 . barthii 24 AA<br />
0 , braehy<strong>an</strong>tha 24 FF<br />
O .eichingeri 24 CC<br />
O. glaberrim a 24 AA<br />
O. glum aepetula 24 AA<br />
O. gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglum is 48 CCDD<br />
O. gr<strong>an</strong>úlala 24 not known ;i<br />
O. M ifolia 48 CCDD 1<br />
O. iongiglum is 48 not known<br />
0 , longistam inata 24 • AA !<br />
0 . malampuzhaensis 48 BBCC<br />
0 . m eridionalis 24 AA<br />
O. m eyeri<strong>an</strong>a 24 not known ■<br />
O. minuta 48 BBCC<br />
0 . nivara 24 AA<br />
0 . officinalis 24 CC(orDD*)<br />
O, perrieri 24 not known<br />
O. punctata 24 BB<br />
O. ridleyi 48 not known |<br />
O. rufipogon 24 AA ;<br />
0 . sativa 24 AA !<br />
0 . schlechteri 24 not known<br />
0 . schw einfurthi<strong>an</strong>a 48 BBCC<br />
0 . tisser<strong>an</strong>ti 24 not known<br />
* Known to be CC but proposed in this paper to be DD.<br />
f<br />
From 1938 to 1943; Morinaga reported pairing behavior of chromosomes<br />
of O. sativa, O. minuta, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 0 . M ifolia as well as of their<br />
hybrids. The three parental* species are fertile (F) but their interspecific<br />
hybrids were completely sterile (S). Based on the pairing behavior of<br />
chromosomes in thé Fi^ hybrids, he inferred their genomic constitution<br />
as follows:<br />
0 . saiiva (F) 12 II AA<br />
0 , minuta (F) 24 II BBCC<br />
0 . latifoUa (F) 2411 CCDD<br />
sativalminuta (S) 361 ABC<br />
sativaAatifolia (S) 361 ACD<br />
minuta/lg.tifoUa (S) 12 II + 24 I BCCD<br />
This proposition presumed the occurrence of diploid species with<br />
BBy CC; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> DD genomes in nature followed by their interspecific<br />
hybridization <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> amphidiploidy in the evolution of tetraploid species.<br />
In subsequent studies on genome <strong>an</strong>alysis, these three species {sativa,
324 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
minuta, latifoHa) virtually became the "tester" species in the sense that<br />
the genomes of other species were tested against the genomic<br />
background of these three species.<br />
AA Species<br />
Morinaga <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kuriyama (1956^ 1957, 1960) reported the hybrids of O.<br />
sativa with O. glumaepetula (their "O. cuhensis'% O. glaberrima, O. harthii<br />
(their "O. breviligulata'') <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. rufipogon (their "0 . perennis"). The first<br />
three hybrids were completely sterile <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the last one partly fertile.<br />
Normal pairing of chromosomes with 12 II was observed in each case.<br />
They concluded that all these species have the same (AA) genome. Nezu<br />
et at. (1960) crossed O. sativa with stapfii <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> spont<strong>an</strong>ea types. While the<br />
former hybrid was completely sterile, the latter was fully fertile.<br />
However, the chromosomes in the hybrids formed 1 2 II during meiosis.<br />
This proved that these two taxa also had the same genome (AA) as O.<br />
sativa. Yeh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Henderson (1961) crossed O. sativa with O. longistaminata<br />
(their "O. barthii"). The hybrid was sterile although 12 II were formed in<br />
meiosis. This established the genome of O. longistaminata as AA.<br />
The findings of all these authors conclusively established that the<br />
genome of all the species of Ser. Sativae is AA. Supporting evidence<br />
came from the interspecific hybrids involving AA species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other<br />
BBCC <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CCDD species.<br />
BBCC Species<br />
!t<br />
Morinaga <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kuriyama (1960) reported the hybrid schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a (24<br />
n ) X minuta (24 II) as forming 24 II. It was therefore inferred that O.<br />
schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a (their "O. eichingeri") has the same genome (BBCC) as<br />
O, minuta. This was subsequently confirmed by Hu (1970).<br />
Gopalkarishn<strong>an</strong>, et al. (1965) reported obtaining hybrids of O.<br />
malampuzhaensis with O. minuta <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a. The hybrids<br />
were sterile <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> formed 24 II in majority of the PMCs. It was inferred<br />
that O, malampuzhaensis has the same BBCC genome as O. minuta <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a. This established that all the Afric<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Asi<strong>an</strong><br />
tetraploid species of Ser. Latifoliae have the BBCC genome.<br />
CCDD Species<br />
Morinaga <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kuriyama (1960) crossed O. latifolia with O. alta (their "O.<br />
paraguaiensis") <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> observed 2 4 II in the F;i hybrid. They concluded that<br />
the latter also has the CCDD genome as in the former. Li et al. (1962)
n<br />
S.D. Sharma et al. 325<br />
repeated this cross <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> confirmed this view. Nezu et al. (1960) crossed<br />
O. latifolia with O. alia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> observed 24 II in the hybrid. This again<br />
established that the genome of O. alia is CCDD. Morinaga (1964)<br />
reported the hybrids of O. gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis with O. latifolia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. alia (his<br />
"O. paraguaiensis") <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> showed that G. gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis also has the same<br />
genome (CCDD). These studies established that all the Americ<strong>an</strong><br />
tetraploid species of Ser. Latifoliae {latifolia, alta, gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis) have the<br />
CCDD genome.<br />
Confirmatory Crosses<br />
Crosses between AA species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> BBCC species have been made by<br />
Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Seetharam<strong>an</strong> (1955), Morinaga <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kuriyama (1960), Nezu<br />
et al. (1960), Kihara et al. (1961), Li et al. (1962), Bouharmont (1962), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Hu (1970). In most of these crosses, 3 6 1 have been observed, confirming<br />
the ABC nature of the hybrids to be that of sativa x minuta (Morinaga,<br />
1940).<br />
Interspecific hybrids involving AA species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CCDD species have<br />
been reported by Gotoh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Okura (1935), Hirayoshi (1937), Morin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Kuriyama (1960), Moringa, et al. (1960,1962), Nezu et al. (1960). Kihara et<br />
al. (1961) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Li et al. (1962). In most of these crosses, 3 6 1 were observed,<br />
confirming the ACD nature of the hybrids to be that of sativa x latifolia<br />
(Morinaga, 1941).<br />
Crosses between the Afric<strong>an</strong> tetraploid (genome BBCC) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />
Americ<strong>an</strong> tetraploid (genome CCDD) species have been reported by<br />
Morinaga (1964), Nezu et al. (1960), Kihara et al., (1961) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Li et al.<br />
(1961, 1962). In all these hybrids 12 II + 24 I have been reported as<br />
expected in BCCD hybrids typical of minuta x latifolia of Morinaga<br />
(1943).<br />
Genome of O. eichingeri (Sri L<strong>an</strong>k<strong>an</strong> form)<br />
O. eichingeri occurs in equatorial Africa was well as in Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka, The<br />
former was identified as "O. officinalis (Ceylon)" by Morinaga (1959),<br />
Gopalkrishn<strong>an</strong> (1966) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Katayama et al. (1972). Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry<br />
(1965) recognized it as a separate species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> called it O. collina. Tate oka<br />
(1962) identified it as O. eichingeri. Sampath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Subram<strong>an</strong>yam (1968)<br />
crossed O. eichingeri of equatorial Africa with O, collina <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reported the<br />
hybrid to be partly fertile. They observed regular pairing of<br />
chromosomes forming 12 11. It was interpreted that the genomes of both<br />
the taxa are the same. The pl<strong>an</strong>t morphology, ecology, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genomic
i<br />
j<br />
326 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
constitution support Tateoka^s (1962) view that the Sri L<strong>an</strong>k<strong>an</strong> material<br />
(O. collina) may be treated as amere vari<strong>an</strong>t of O. eichingeri only. Biswal<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sharma (1987) agreed with Tateoka (1962) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> likewise considered<br />
it only a vari<strong>an</strong>t of O. eichingeri.<br />
Morinaga <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kuriyama (1959) crossed the Sri L<strong>an</strong>k<strong>an</strong> form of O.<br />
eichingeri (their "O. officinalis Ceylon") with AA, BBCQ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CCDD<br />
species. The pairing behavior of chromosomes observed in the hybrids<br />
is shown below:<br />
sativa (AA)/"officinalis (Ceylon)" , 241<br />
minuta {BBCC)/"officinalis (Ceylon)"<br />
12 II + 12 I<br />
"officinalis (Ceylon)"/latifolia (CCDD)<br />
1211 + 12 I<br />
"officinalis (Ceylon)"/gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis (CCDD) 1 2 II + 1 2 1<br />
The pairing behavior of chromosomes indicated that the genome of<br />
O. eichingeri (their "O. officinalis (Ceylon)") differed from O. sativa (AA)<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> was homologous to one of the genomes of O. minuta (BBCC) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
latifolia (CCDD). Hence Morinaga <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kuriyama (1960) proposed that<br />
the genome of the Sri L<strong>an</strong>k<strong>an</strong> form of O, eichingeri, i.e., their "O. officinalis<br />
(Ceylon)"/ is CC.<br />
Genome of O. eichingeri (Afric<strong>an</strong> form)<br />
iiH<br />
hîil il*<br />
The Afric<strong>an</strong> form of O. eichingeri was crossed with O. sativa (AA)/ O.<br />
minuta (BBCC), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. latifolia (CCDD) by Hu (1970). In sativa x<br />
eichingeri, he observed 2 4 1 in 65% PMCs, 1 II + 2 2 1 in 22% PMCs, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 2 -<br />
4 II in the remaining 13%. In minuta x eichingeri, 10 II + 16 I were<br />
observed in a few pollen mother cells but in the others, restitution nuclei<br />
were formed. In latifolia x O. eichingeri, the number of bivalents per cell<br />
was 9 but more th<strong>an</strong> 50% cells had 10 to 12 II. According to Hu (1970),<br />
this indicated that the genome of O. eichingeri is common with one of the<br />
genomes of O. minuta (BBCC) as well as O. latifolia (CCDD). In other<br />
words, the genome of O. eichingeri appears to be CC.<br />
O. punctata<br />
O. punctata is a diploid species with 2n = 24 chromosomes forming 12 II<br />
at meiotic metaphase-I. Katayama (1967) crossed this species with O.<br />
minuta <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a (his "O, punctata~4x") <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> observed 1 2 II<br />
+ 12 I at the meiotic metaphase-I of their hybrids in either case. He<br />
therefore considered that the genome of O. punctata is available in O.<br />
minuta <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a (his "O. punctata 4x") (both BBCC). Hence<br />
he proposed the genomic constitution of O. punctata (2x) as BB. Hu<br />
(1970) observed a me<strong>an</strong> configuration of 12 II in latifolia x O. punctata
S.D. Sharma et al. 327<br />
hybrid <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> concluded that the genome of O. punctata is neither CC nor<br />
DD <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> thus confirmed Katayama^s (1967) assumption that O. punctata<br />
is BB.<br />
DD Species<br />
O. rhizomatis is a newly described diploid species endemic to Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka,<br />
To determine its genome, Dhua (1994) crossed this species with O.<br />
latifolia (CCDD), O. minuta (BBCC), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. eichingeri (CC) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> studied<br />
the pairing of their chromosomes in the meiotic metaphase of their Fj<br />
hybrids. He observed 10 or more trivalents in 60% PMCs in the hybrid of<br />
latifolia X rhizomatis the me<strong>an</strong> configuration being 9.68 trivalents, 2.14 II<br />
bivalents <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 2.68 univalents. He concluded the genome of O, rhizomatis<br />
to be either CC or DD, confirming the earlier views that the C <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D<br />
genomes were homologous (Richhaira, 1960) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> capable of pairing <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
forming up to 12 bivalents (Li et al., 1963; Shastry, 1965). In the hybrid<br />
minuta x O. rhizomatis, he observed 22 or more univalents in 84% PMCs,<br />
the me<strong>an</strong> configuration for all the PMCs being 0.1 III + 4.90 II + 25.71. He<br />
interpreted the genome of O. rhizomatis to be DD <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the pairing (mostly<br />
bivalents) observed in this hybrid due to homology between the C<br />
genome of O. minuta <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D genome cf O, rhizomatis. In eichingeri x<br />
rhizomatis, he observed 5 to 10 bivalents in 70% PMCs, the me<strong>an</strong> pairing<br />
for all the PMCs being 5.2 II + 13.61 I. According to him, the genomic<br />
constitution of both these species are different. In other words, the<br />
genomic constitution of this hybrid is CD <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pairing is due to homology<br />
between C <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D genomes.<br />
Genome of O. Officinalis<br />
The hybrid between O. sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. officinalis has been studied by m<strong>an</strong>y<br />
workers (Ram<strong>an</strong>uj<strong>an</strong>, 1937; N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>i, 1938; Gopalakrishn<strong>an</strong>, 1959;<br />
Morinaga <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kuriyama, 1960; Shastry et al., 1961). They reported 24 I,<br />
indicating that the genome of O. officinalis differs from that of O. sativa<br />
(AA). O. officinalis has been crossed with O. latifolia, O. alta, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis (all CCDD) by m<strong>an</strong>y <strong>research</strong>ers (Morinaga <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kuriyama,<br />
1960; Nezu et al, 1960; Li et al, 1962). The hybrids were sterile <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
formed mostly 12 II + 12 I during meiosis. This indicated that the<br />
genome of O. offtcinalis is either CC or DD.<br />
In the hybrid malampuzhaensis x officinalis, Gopalakrishn<strong>an</strong> (1959)<br />
observed 2 to 36 univalents in 42 PMCs with the following frequencies:<br />
Univalents: 2-8 10-12 13-17 18-22 23-36<br />
Frequencies: 2 11 8 14 7<br />
It is evident that 29 of the 42 PMCs had more th<strong>an</strong> 12 I, while 21 of<br />
them had 18 I or more. The me<strong>an</strong> number of bivalents observed by him<br />
'I
328 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
was 9 II. Using the genomic symbols 0^0^ for BB, 0^0^ for CC, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
0^0^ for DD, he wrote "the genome of both the species may be<br />
represented as<br />
(malampuzhaensis) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 0^0^ {pfficinalisY. He<br />
concluded that the genome of O. officinalis was DD. Katayama (1967)<br />
studied altogether 36 PMCs of minuta x officinalis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> recorded 10 to 13<br />
II (me<strong>an</strong> 11.82 II). According to Dhua (1994)^ this was due to the<br />
homology between the CC genome of O. minuta <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> DD genome of O.<br />
officinalis. The hybrids officinalis x eichingeri (CC) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> officinalis x collina<br />
(CC) form 12 bivalents at meiotic metaphase-I (Hu/ 1970). However^<br />
mostly bivalents were observed in the amphidiploid of this hybrid<br />
(Gopalakrishn<strong>an</strong>, 1964; Hu, 1970) leading one to suspect that the genome<br />
of O. officinalis is different from that of O. collina (CC). The hybrid<br />
between coUina-officinalis amphidiploid <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. latifolia was studied by<br />
Sharma et al. (1974). It had 85% pollen fertility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> formed 20.85 II at<br />
meiotic metaphase-I. This led them to suspect that the genome of O,<br />
officinalis could be DD.<br />
Dhua (1994) crossed O. officinalis with O. rhizomatis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> studied the<br />
pairing behavior of their chromosome sin their hybrid. He observed<br />
10 to 12 bivalents in 74% PMCs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> concluded that the genome of O.<br />
officinalis is the same as that of O. rhizomatis (DD).<br />
Historically speaking, the genome of O. officinalis has been assumed<br />
to be CC ever since Morinaga <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kuriyama (1959) proposed the<br />
genome CC for O. officinalis (Ceylon), which is now identified as O.<br />
eichingeri only. In fatt, as far back as 1959, Gopalakrishn<strong>an</strong> (1959)<br />
proposed the genome DD for O. officinalis. Using the genomic symbols<br />
0^0^ for BB, 0^0^ for CC <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 0^0^ for DD <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> commenting about the<br />
hybrid malampuzhaensis x officinalis, he wrote "thus the genome of both<br />
these species may be represented as<br />
{malampuzhaensis) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
0^0^ {officinalis)". In the Fj hybrid (O^O^O^), either autosyndesis<br />
between 0 ^0 ^or allosyndesis between <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> or c<strong>an</strong> take place.<br />
According to Gopalakrishn<strong>an</strong> (1964), there is no need to search for<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts with the D genome outside the species of O. officinalis as one or<br />
the other geograplrical race of O, officinalis might contain it. Similarly,<br />
Sharma (1964) commented that "the DD species is not expected to differ<br />
much from O. officinalis".<br />
Genome of O. australiensis<br />
From 1960 to 1963, the interspecific hybrids of O. australiensis with O.<br />
sativa (AA), O. minuta (BBCC) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. alta (CCDD) were reported by<br />
Morinaga <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> his associates (Morinaga <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kuriyama, 1960; Morinaga<br />
et al., 1960; Morinaga et al., 1962) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> m<strong>an</strong>y others (Nezu et al, 1960;<br />
Kihara et al, 1961; Li et al, 1961, 1963).
All these hybrids were completely sterile <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the number of<br />
bivalents observed were few <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> could be interpreted as autosyndetic<br />
only. It was therefore concluded that the genome of O. australiensis is not<br />
homologous to either A, B, C, or D <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hence a new genome symbol EE<br />
was proposed for this species (IRRb 1964),<br />
Genome of O. bmchy<strong>an</strong>tha<br />
S.D. Sharma el al. 329<br />
O. brachy<strong>an</strong>tha was crossed with O, sativa (AA), O. minuta (BBCC), O,<br />
alia (Labelled as "O. paraguaiensis") (CCDD) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. australiensis (EE).<br />
Success in these crosses was achieved after a very high number of<br />
pollinations <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> embryo culture of the hybrid seeds. All these hybrids<br />
were sterile. It is remarkable that the small pl<strong>an</strong>t size of O. brachy<strong>an</strong>tha<br />
was domin<strong>an</strong>t over large pl<strong>an</strong>t size of other species. Univalents were<br />
observed in all the hybrids indicating that the genome of O. brachy<strong>an</strong>tha<br />
was not homologous to A, B, C or Taking into consideration the wide<br />
morphological differences with O. australiensis, it was presumed that<br />
this genome could not be the same as that of O. australiensis. The genome<br />
symbol FF was therefore proposed for this species (IRRI, 1964).<br />
Thus, the genomes of all the species belonging to Sect. Oryza have<br />
now been determined. In Sect. O. <strong>an</strong>gustifolia, the only genome of O.<br />
brachy<strong>an</strong>tha has been determined to date. Genome <strong>an</strong>alysis of species<br />
included in Sect. Padia has not yet been attempted. Genome <strong>an</strong>alysis of<br />
species of the genus Oryza remains incomplete.<br />
Integenomic Relationships<br />
Interspecific hybrids with a genomic constitution of ABC, BCE, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> BCF<br />
help in <strong>an</strong>alyzing the relationship of B <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> C genomes. Similarly,<br />
interspecific hybrids with ACD, CDF, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CDF genomes help in<br />
determining the relationship of C <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D genomes. From the data on<br />
chromosomal pairing reported on such hybrids by m<strong>an</strong>y authors (Nezu<br />
et al, 1960; Kihara et al, 1961; Li et al, 1961,1962,1963, 1964; Katayama,<br />
1966a, 1966b; Nowick, 1986), it appears that the genomes B, C, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D are<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, among the three genomes, C <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> homologous D show greater<br />
homology th<strong>an</strong> B <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> C (Shastry, 1965).<br />
Autopolyploids have been induced in some species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> interspecific<br />
hybrids resulted in pl<strong>an</strong>ts with a genomic constitution CCCC,<br />
CCCCDDDD, BBBBCCCC, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CCCCBBDD. In all such cases, the<br />
number of quadrivalents observed at meiotic metaphase-I is far less<br />
th<strong>an</strong> expected, resulting mostly in bivalents (Wat<strong>an</strong>abe <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ono, 1965,<br />
1966; Hu, 1967). According to Wat<strong>an</strong>abe <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ono (1966), the D genome
330 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
at higher poloidy levels is capable of suppressing not only intergenomic,<br />
but also intragenomic pairings in particular in the formation of<br />
multivalents.<br />
SuBGENOMic D if f e r e n t ia t io n<br />
Based on the intergenomic pairing observed in ABC^ ACD, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> BCCD<br />
hybrids, Gopalakrishn<strong>an</strong> (1959), Richhaira (1960), Gopalakrishn<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Sampath (1966) treated the B, C, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D genomes as subgenomes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
designated them as O^, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> respectively.<br />
The isogenomic species exhibit differences in their morphology,<br />
geographic distribution <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ecological adaptation. The fact that<br />
spéciation has adv<strong>an</strong>ced further at the isogenomic level is a matter of<br />
evolutionary signific<strong>an</strong>ce in the genus. The interspecific hybrids within<br />
these isogenomic species have been studied by m<strong>an</strong>y workers. These<br />
hybrids are often partially sterile, indicating that genetic differentiation<br />
has taken place even within the same genomes.<br />
Yeh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Henderson (1961, 1962) crossed the species of AA genome<br />
in various combinations. Based on the pollen sterility of their hybrids,<br />
the degree of pairing of their chromosomes at meiotic metaphase-I, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
irregularities in synapsis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> disjunction of chromosomes, they assigned<br />
different subgenomes to the AA species as follows:<br />
AA p . sativa, O. nivara, O. rufipogon<br />
A W O, glaberrima, O. barthii<br />
A^A^ O. longistaminata<br />
0 . glumaepetula<br />
O. meridionalis<br />
(The superscripts have been ch<strong>an</strong>ged with the ch<strong>an</strong>ge in the names of<br />
species. The subgenome for O. meridionalis has been added. For<br />
subgenomic symbols one may refer to Ch<strong>an</strong>ge (1985) Vaugh<strong>an</strong> (1989).<br />
According to Gopalakrishn<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sampath (1966), O, latifolia, O.<br />
alia, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis may be treated as three subspecies of a single<br />
species, O. latifolia only.<br />
Gopalakrishn<strong>an</strong> (1965) crossed different ecotypes of O. officinalis<br />
among themselves <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> observed complete sterility in their F^ hybrids.<br />
He, however, obseirved formation of 1 2 II at meiotic metaphase-I in these<br />
Fj hybrids. He concluded that sufficient genetic differentiation has taken<br />
placé at the chromosomal level in this species through this genetic<br />
différentiation has not been associated with commensurate<br />
morphological differentiation.
S.D. Sharma et aL 331<br />
ISOZYME AND MOLECULAR STUDIES<br />
In the present study^ the taxonomy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> phylogenetic relationships of<br />
species in the genus are discussed based on recent findings in these<br />
areas:<br />
1. Electrophoretic pattern of alcohol dehydrogenase<br />
2. Fluorescence in situ hybridization<br />
3. Restriction <strong>an</strong>alysis of chloroplast DNAs<br />
4. Restriction <strong>an</strong>alysis of nuclear DNA<br />
5. Repetitive sequences for genome specificity.<br />
Electrophoretic Pattern of Alcohol Dehydrogenase<br />
Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), <strong>an</strong> enzyme of the glycolytic pathway, is<br />
highly conserved <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> therefore useful for studying species level<br />
relationships. Variability of ADH c<strong>an</strong> be studied both under aerobic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
<strong>an</strong>aerobic conditions. Richard et a/. (1986) reported increased expression<br />
of ADH under aerobic conditions but observed no novel b<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s under<br />
such conditions. However, the variation in the genus Oiyza with respect<br />
to ADH expression both under aerobic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>aerobic condition is not<br />
known.<br />
Using ADH isozyme patterns. Second (1982) studied the variability<br />
within a large number of accessions of O. sativa (japónica, indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
jav<strong>an</strong>ica), O. glaberrima, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> species of the O. perennis complex of Asia<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Africa. He studied the electrophoretic patterns of 13 different<br />
enzymes in 1,948 strains <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> found that the ADH locus was<br />
monomorphic.<br />
Isozyrhe patterns of ADH c<strong>an</strong> be studied by electrophoresis in<br />
starch gels, by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> by<br />
isoelectric focusing (lEF) in polyacrylamide gels. Grover <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pental<br />
(1992) extracted ADH from germinating seeds <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> studied the ADH<br />
profiles of 141 different accessions of 19 Oryza species by PAGE. Based<br />
on ADH isozyme patterns, the genus Oryza was classified into six<br />
different groups represented by:<br />
(i) O. sativa, O. nivara, O, rufipogon (Asi<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> some Americ<strong>an</strong><br />
types), O. galberrima, O. barthii, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. longistaminata<br />
(ii) O. officinalis, O. punctata, O. minuta, O. latifolia, O. alia, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis<br />
(iii) O. australiensis<br />
(iv) O. ridleyi <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. longiglumis<br />
(v) O. hrachy<strong>an</strong>tha, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
(vi) O, gr<strong>an</strong>úlala <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a.<br />
However, if <strong>an</strong>other conservative marker (Rubisco-LS protein) is<br />
taken into consideration, then the three species of the Americ<strong>an</strong>
332 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
continent, O. laiifolia, O. alia, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis form one closely<br />
related group that is distinct from other species of the O. officinalis<br />
group. The position of some of the O. rufipogori accessions (Americ<strong>an</strong><br />
types) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. eichingeri vis-a-vis O. punctata was not clear. However, O.<br />
punctata (4x), O. minuta, O. alia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O, gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong> ADH pattern<br />
similar to that of O. officinalis—a species presumed to have contributed<br />
one of the genomes of these species.<br />
Isozymes are, however, tissue specific <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> affected by the environment<br />
as well as the stage of development. Their limited number<br />
prevents them from providing complete genome coverage (Smith <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Smith, 1990). Nevertheless, the use of isozymes remains a quick, cheap,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> easy method for a preliminary survey based on a few markers.<br />
Variability detected through Fluorescence in situ Hybridization<br />
TISH'<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> chromosomes with a large 17s-5.8s-25s ribosomal RNA gene<br />
(rDNA) array have been identified as satellite chromosomes by their<br />
characteristics. The chromosomes are also recognized as nuclear<br />
org<strong>an</strong>izing regions (NOR chromosomes). Although the rDNAcontaining<br />
chromosomes show conspicuous characteristics as satellite<br />
chromosomes, they are sometimes difficult to identify morphological<br />
when the copy number of the rDNA units at the locus is small. The in<br />
situ hybridization method offers a way out of this impasse since it is<br />
based on the detection of rDNA loci directly by molecular hybridization.<br />
Although in situ hybridization is now widely employed in cytogenetic<br />
<strong>an</strong>alysis, it is time consuming <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> need strict experimental protocols. In<br />
the PISH technique in conjunction with the imaging method, use of<br />
thermal cycle <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> various post treatments are quite reproducible <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
convenient. Fukui et al. (1994) took nine rice species, trisomics for<br />
chromosome 9 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 10 of O. sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their original variety IR24, to<br />
study the rDNA in Oryza by use of FISH. The genomes under this study<br />
were A, A^^, B, C, E, F <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CD. One or two rDNA loci were identified in<br />
with species <strong>an</strong> A genome. The B genome species showed three rDNA<br />
loci. Two C genome species showed either two or three rDNA loci.<br />
Species with the E <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> F genomes exhibited either two or one rDNA loci<br />
respectively. The number of rDNA loci in the D genome may be either<br />
two or three as in the case of the C genome species.<br />
The study by Fukui et al (1994) revealed variability in the number of<br />
rDNA loci in eight diploid <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one tetraploid species within the genus<br />
Oryza. O. rufipogon, a putative <strong>an</strong>cestor of cultivated rice, has rDNA<br />
variability which is similar to that of cultivated rice that has either one or<br />
two rDNA loci. Varieties of temperate regions have one rDNA locus
S.D. Sharma ef al. 333<br />
while those of tropical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subtropical regions have two rDNA loci.<br />
fav<strong>an</strong>ica is sometimes referred to as tropical japónica. Two jav<strong>an</strong>ica<br />
varieties showed two pairs of rDNA loci, indicating their similarity with<br />
indica (Table 14.2). This result may be explained by the environmental<br />
similarity of the areas where both jav<strong>an</strong>ica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> indica varieties are grown.<br />
Restriction Endonuclease Analysis of Chloroplast DNAs<br />
Restriction endonuclease <strong>an</strong>alysis of the chloroplast DNAs (ctDNAs)<br />
has been used to determine the phylogenetic relationship between<br />
closely related species or genera. Results of such <strong>an</strong>alysis have revealed<br />
that ctDNAs from related taxa exhibit wide variation even within the<br />
same genus (Ogihara <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tsunewaki, 1988; Kishima et al. 1987). Ishii et<br />
al, (1986) isolated ctDNAs from rice species of AA genome <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
established the relationship among them with reference to differences in<br />
lengths of restriction fragments of ctDNAs. Ichikawa et al. (1986) isolated<br />
total DNAs from the same Orym species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> detected restriction<br />
patterns by Southern hybridization with ctDNA from O, sativa as probes.<br />
T a b le 14.2<br />
N um ber of rDN A loci detected in cultivated rice {Oryza sativa)<br />
Species Genome Varietal group Variety nam e N um ber of<br />
rD N A loci<br />
O. sativa AA japónica N ipponbare 1<br />
Aikoku 1<br />
Tushim aakam ai 1<br />
Tarizaohsien 1<br />
Kouketsum ochi 2<br />
C h 7 8 1<br />
C h 7 9 1<br />
indica Chinsurah Boro II 2<br />
Kasalath 2<br />
IR 3 6 2<br />
jav<strong>an</strong>ica Ket<strong>an</strong> N <strong>an</strong>ga 2<br />
Inakupa 2<br />
0. rufipogon AA Annual type 2<br />
Perennial type 2<br />
Perennial type 1<br />
O. glumaepatula A8f AfiP 1<br />
O. punctata BB 3<br />
0. officinalis CC 3<br />
O. eichingeri cc 2<br />
O, australiensis EE 2<br />
O. hrachy<strong>an</strong>tha FF 1<br />
0 , latifolia CCDD 5
334 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
However, they used nine strains that represented only seven species of<br />
Oryza. Similarly, Dally <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Second (1990) isolated ctDNAs from 247<br />
accessions representing 13 Oryza species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> detected differences while<br />
examining restriction patterns by agarose gel electrophoresis.<br />
Chloroplast DNA from O. sativa was cloned by Hirai et al. (1985) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
a physical map was constructed. Subsequently, the complete sequence<br />
of the ctDNA was determined by Hiratsuka et al. (1989). K<strong>an</strong>no <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Hirai (1992) isolated ctDNA from O. punctata, O. officinalis, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
australiensis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> constructed overlapping clone b<strong>an</strong>ks of the entire<br />
chloroplast genome of each of these three species. They also constructed<br />
physical maps of the ctDNA of these species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> compared them. It was<br />
found that two fragments of ctDNAs from O. punctata <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. officinalis<br />
were shorter th<strong>an</strong> the corresponding fragments from O. sativa.<br />
Nevertheless, it is difficult to explain how these deletions/insertions<br />
could be produced during the evolution of the various species of Oryza.<br />
Qne may assume that mutational events had occurred minimal times<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> deletions had been hardly reversible. Both deletion <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insertion<br />
are the results of DNA recombination. However, deletion maybe caused<br />
by intramolecular recombination, which may occur more easily th<strong>an</strong><br />
insertion caused by intermolecular recombination.<br />
Restriction Analysis of Nuclear DNA<br />
The genus Oryza has been subjected to morphometric, cytogenetic,<br />
isozyme, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chloroplast DNA restriction <strong>an</strong>alysis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> all have<br />
contributed in complementary ways to our underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing of the genus.<br />
Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) <strong>an</strong>alysis of nuclear<br />
DNA is a novel tool for studying genetic variation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> phylogenetic<br />
relationship among populations <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> species of Oryza. Since RFLP<br />
<strong>an</strong>alysis is done directly at the DNA level, it expresses the heritable<br />
ch<strong>an</strong>ge in the nucleotide sequence both in coding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> non-coding<br />
regions, RFLP studies arc more sensitive to genetic ch<strong>an</strong>ges th<strong>an</strong> those<br />
of isozymes, which reflect only those ch<strong>an</strong>ges resulting in specific amino<br />
acid substitutions. Moreover, the available RFLP markers in rice are<br />
more th<strong>an</strong> isozyme markers. It is therefore possible to study a relatively<br />
large number of loci scattered throughout the genome by use of this<br />
technique.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g et al. (1991) undertook a study to determine the level of RFLP<br />
variation both within <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> between the species in the genus Oryza <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to<br />
determine the phylogenetic relationship among the species in this genus.<br />
They took 3 to 5 individuals as samples from each of 22 accessions<br />
representing species from the genus Oryza. Each sample was tested with
S.D. Sharma et al. 335<br />
15 RFLP probes using a single restriction enzyme, Eco Rl. They observed<br />
no signific<strong>an</strong>t differences between diploids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tetraploids with respect<br />
to within-species-polymorphism. The tetraploid species O, latifolia was<br />
among the highly polymorphic species, suggesting that this species may<br />
not be of recent origin. In general, recently created polyploids are likely<br />
to have limited genetic variation due to the genetic bottleneck imposed<br />
by the polyploidization.event.<br />
Classification of Oiyza species based on RFLP matched remarkably<br />
well with the previous classifications based on morphology, genomic<br />
constitution, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> isozymes. Four species complexes could be identified<br />
corresponding to those proposed by Vaugh<strong>an</strong> (1989): the O. ridley<br />
complex, the O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a complex, the O, officinalis complex, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the O.<br />
sativa complex. Within the O. sativa complex, accessions of O. rufipogon<br />
from Asia (including O. nivara) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> perennial forms of O. rufipogon<br />
Australia clustered together with the accessions of cultivated rice O.<br />
sativa. Surprisingly, indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica showed a closer affinity with<br />
different accessions of wild O, mfipogon th<strong>an</strong> with each other,<br />
supporting a hypothesis of independent domestication for these two<br />
types of rice. Australi<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>nual wild rice, O. meridionalis, was clearly<br />
distinct from all other accessions of O. rufipogon, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> was considered a<br />
separate species (Ng et al., 1981).<br />
Using genetic relatedness as a criterion, it was possible to identify<br />
the closest living diploid relatives of the currently known tetraploid rice<br />
species. Results from these <strong>an</strong>alyses suggest that the BBCC tetraploids<br />
(O. malampuzhaensis, O. schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. minuta) are either of<br />
independent origin or have experienced "introgression from sympatric<br />
C-genome diploid rice species" (Ng et al., 1981). The CCDD tetraploids<br />
species of America (O. latifolia, O. alta, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis) may be of<br />
<strong>an</strong>cient origin since they show a closer affinity to each other th<strong>an</strong> to <strong>an</strong>y<br />
known diploid species. Their closest living diploid relatives belong to C<br />
genome (O. eichingeri) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> E genome (O. australiensis) species.<br />
Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kochert (1991) used RFLP <strong>an</strong>alysis to detect genomic DNA<br />
variation within the accessions of O. latifolia, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> among the accessions<br />
of O. latifolia, O. alta <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis—the alióte trap loid species<br />
with genomic constitution CCDD. Based on RFLP data, they observed<br />
all these populations to be of a single species rather th<strong>an</strong> of three different<br />
types. This finding was consistent with the reports based on their<br />
morphology, crossability, cytology, isozyme, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chloroplast DNA<br />
<strong>an</strong>alysis (Nezu et al., 1960; Gopalakrishn<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sampath, 1966;<br />
Katayama, 1967; Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, 1984). A phylogenetic tree, based on<br />
parsimony <strong>an</strong>alysis by Jena <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kochert (1991) grouped the accessions<br />
into clusters which fitted with their geographic origins. Based on this,<br />
they conjectured the origin of some of the accessions. For example, their
336 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
<strong>an</strong>alysis clustered one accession of O. latifolia with two other accessions<br />
(one of O. alia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one of O. latifolia), which were from Brazil^ suggesting<br />
that the accession O. latifolia might have originated from Brazil only.<br />
RFLP for Intraspecific Differentiation<br />
Ishii etal (1995) carried out <strong>an</strong> experiment to clarify the nuclear genome<br />
differentiation in Asi<strong>an</strong> varieties of O. sativa based on the restriction<br />
fragment patterns with two endonucleases. Eco RI <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hind III, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
using 12 single-copy rice DNA probes. They found 93 types of nuclear<br />
genomes among 112 local varieties from 17 Asi<strong>an</strong> countries. Those 93<br />
types of nuclear genomes were divided into eight groups, namely. A,<br />
Bl, B2, C l, C2, Dl, D2, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> E. These results were compared with the<br />
previous isozyme <strong>an</strong>alysis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> RFLP <strong>an</strong>alysis on chloroplast genome<br />
using the same varieties. Classification of isozyme <strong>an</strong>alysis matched<br />
well with that.of nuclear genome indicating synchronous differentiation<br />
of isozyme constitutions <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nuclear genome in Asi<strong>an</strong> varieties. Nuclear<br />
genomes were grouped into indica (A, Bl, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> B2), intermediate (Cl,<br />
C2, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Dl) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica (D2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> E) types. Earlier chloroplast (ct) DNA<br />
was studied by Ishii et al. (1988) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Dally <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Second (1990), who<br />
found two major chloroplast genome types (type 1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> type 3) in<br />
japónica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> indica varieties. Ishii et al. (1993) also examined<br />
mitochondrial DNA variation O. sflhufl <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> found that the mitochondrial<br />
genome differentiated between japónica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> indica varieties. They concluded<br />
that the japónica group with D2 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> E nuclear genomes has only<br />
the type 1 chloroplast genome, whereas indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>[ intermediate groups<br />
contain both (type 1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> type 3) chloroplast genomes. It is noteworthy<br />
that the type 3 chloroplast genome, which was not found in the japónica<br />
group was the domin<strong>an</strong>t type in the indica varieties. The result indicates<br />
that differentiation of the nuclear genome had partially synchronized<br />
with that of the chloroplast genome.<br />
Zheng et al. (1994) studied three indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> three japónica testers for<br />
wide compatibility along with 21 wide-compatibility varieties (WCV)<br />
using 160 RFLP probes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> four enzymes: Eco RI, Eco RV, Hind III, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Xba I. They found that 68 out of 160 probes were indica-japonica tester<br />
differentiated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> produced identical hybridization patterns between<br />
subsepecies. Qi<strong>an</strong> et al. (1995) tested those 68 indica-japonica tester<br />
differentiating probes in seven indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> seven japónica varieties to<br />
distinguish subspecies differentiating probes. Twenty-one probes were<br />
confirmed to be subspecies differentiating probes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> showed different<br />
hybridization patterns between indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica subspecies with at<br />
least one enzyme digestion. For 19 of the 21 indica-japonica
S.D. Sharma et al. 337<br />
differentiating probes^ polymorphisms between indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica<br />
were detected by more th<strong>an</strong> one enzyme^, indicating that most of the<br />
polymorphisms between the two subspecies were due to insertions/<br />
deletions (McCouch et ah, 1988). This implies that rearr<strong>an</strong>gements in the<br />
genome have played <strong>an</strong> import<strong>an</strong>t role in the evolution of cultivated<br />
rice.<br />
Repetitive Sequences for Genome Specificity<br />
One distinguishing feature of the genomes of most of the higher<br />
eukaryotes is the presence of large amounts of repetitive DNA, In higher<br />
<strong>an</strong>imals, m<strong>an</strong>y repetitive sequences are well characterized in terms of<br />
their length, abund<strong>an</strong>ce, chromosomal distribution, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> even nucleotide<br />
sequences. Recently, a number of studies on repetitive sequences have<br />
been reported in higher pl<strong>an</strong>ts such as rye, wheat, barley, maize, flax,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice. One import<strong>an</strong>t conclusion drawn from these studies is that<br />
repetitive sequences appear to ch<strong>an</strong>ge rapidly during evolution <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are<br />
useful in studying genome evolution at the molecular level. The rice<br />
nuclear genome contains approximately 50% repetitive DNA as determined<br />
by Q t <strong>an</strong>alysis (Deshph<strong>an</strong>e <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> R<strong>an</strong>jekar, 1980; Zhou, 1986).<br />
Zhao et al. (1989) undertook a study to <strong>an</strong>alyze the divergence of rice<br />
species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the evolutionary relationship among related genomes.<br />
Thirty-seven rice entries were used in their experiment, representing 13<br />
species. They used four repetitive sequences as probes to screen all the<br />
rice DNA samples from the 37 entries by slot-blot hybridization. When<br />
pOs 48 was used as the probe, only DNA samples from the AA genome<br />
showed hybridization. This indicates that the repetitive sequence of pOs<br />
48 is A A genome specific although the copy number in various AA<br />
genome rice varieties differs.<br />
When pOa 4 was used as a probe, strong hybridization was<br />
observed, mainly with O. australiensis DNA (EE genome). Much weaker<br />
hybridization was barely visible with O. alta <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. latijblia (CCDD<br />
genome) but no hybridization was found with other genomes. This<br />
shows that repeated sequencing of pOa 4 is EE genome specific. Weak<br />
hybridization to the CCDD genome suggests that the CCDD <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> EE<br />
genomes are more closely related to each other; pQa2 only hybridized to<br />
DNA from O. officinaiis (CC genome), indicating that this repetitive<br />
sequence is CC genome specific. It is interesting that this probe did not<br />
hybridize with O. alta <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. latifoHa (CCDD genome). The absence of<br />
this sequence in certain species with a CC complement suggests that this<br />
CC genome specific sequence may be lost in the CCDD genome of O. alta<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. latifoUa. Alternatively, there may be two subtypes of the CC
338 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
genome which contain different repetitive DNAs. The probe pObl is FF<br />
genome specific since it only hybridized with DNA from O. hrachy<strong>an</strong>tha.<br />
In order to determine the specific chromosome location of the rDNA<br />
probes, Cordesse et ai (1992) <strong>an</strong>alyzed the nuclear ribosomal gene<br />
intergenic spaces in rice. This study confirmed that spacer variability in<br />
wild species is due to variation in the copy number of the 250-260 bp<br />
repeats <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, furthermore, that other regions of the spacer are also<br />
involved in variability,<br />
Various genomes, as observed by rDNA technology, fall into groups<br />
that roughly correspond to those defined by extensive use of isozyme<br />
variation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> RFLP (Second, 1984; Dally <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Second, 1990). The AA <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
BB genomes are rather close to each other, differing only in the region<br />
spaimed by pRR 217-10 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 11. The CC genome seems to be more<br />
divergent because, although CC spacer fragments hybridized to the<br />
same probes as the BB fragments, the intensity of the hybridizing b<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s<br />
was always lower. The EE genome shows extensive divergence. The<br />
rDNA spacer from the FF genome shows the closest similarity to that of<br />
AA with only one probe discriminating between them. Since the<br />
distribution area of O. hrachy<strong>an</strong>tha largely overlaps that of other species<br />
of the AA genome in Africa, the possibility exists for a coevolution of<br />
ribosomal genes between the two genomes or <strong>an</strong> early introgression of<br />
AA genome ribosomal genes into the FF genome.<br />
The other feature revealed by this <strong>an</strong>alysis was the discrep<strong>an</strong>cy<br />
between observation on CC <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CCDD genomes. Genes coming from<br />
the CC genome had perhaps been eliminated in the allotetraploid.<br />
Cloning of these genes should provide probe(s) to trace the DD genes in<br />
wild relatives of rice in America as CCDD species are found only in this<br />
continent.<br />
PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AND EVOLUTIONARY<br />
TRENDS<br />
Studies on the comparative morphology of Oryza species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cytogenetic<br />
studies of their interspecific hybrids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genome <strong>an</strong>alysis have<br />
contributed much information regarding the relationship between<br />
species of the genus Oryza. Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry (1971) have discussed<br />
the primitive or adv<strong>an</strong>ced nature of various characters <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, based on<br />
these, Sharma (1986) presented a comprehensive picture of the<br />
evolutionary trends in the genus Oryza. According to him, the genus<br />
was initially represented by small-size pl<strong>an</strong>ts growing in well-drained<br />
moist soil in equatorial forests under high humidity conditions. The<br />
primitive species were small in stature <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> adapted to forest shade.
S.D. Sharma et a h 339<br />
Subsequently a gradual evolution in ihe genus from forest shade to open<br />
habitat took place <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, in this process, the species became hydrophytes<br />
to maintain their physiological homeostasis. Thereby the species of<br />
Oryza became robust, tall, with well-ramified p<strong>an</strong>icle <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> even larger<br />
size spikelets.<br />
Sect, Padia represents the most primitive group of species (Sharma,<br />
1986). O. schlechteri <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O, meyeri<strong>an</strong>a are small-size pl<strong>an</strong>ts growing in<br />
well-drained soils in forest shade. Sect. Angustifolia occupies a relatively<br />
adv<strong>an</strong>ced position in the evolution of the genus Oryza. Of these, O.<br />
perrieri <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. tisser<strong>an</strong>ti are the perennial species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more primitive<br />
th<strong>an</strong> O. hrachy<strong>an</strong>tha <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. <strong>an</strong>gustifolia. All these species have retained<br />
the small pl<strong>an</strong>t size but have adapted to open habitat <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> aquatic<br />
conditions.<br />
The large pl<strong>an</strong>t size does not m<strong>an</strong>ifest itself in the genus until the<br />
evolution of Sect. Oryza. In this section, Ser. Latifoliae is comparatively<br />
primitive, with most of the species adapted to partial shade <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> moist<br />
soils, near running streams, etc. In some species, such as O. eichingeri,<br />
the pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> p<strong>an</strong>icle size are comparatively small <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the species grows<br />
in well-drained moist soil in the humid tropical forests of Ug<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka. On the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, O. officinalis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. latifolia are<br />
represented by much larger pl<strong>an</strong>t size with well-ramified p<strong>an</strong>icle. These<br />
species are still adapted to partial shade <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are only partly hydrophytes.<br />
O. australiensis, on the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, is adapted to open habitat <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
grows in pools of water. In Ser. Sativae, the pl<strong>an</strong>ts are completely<br />
hydrophytic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> adapted to open habitat. The major trend in this series<br />
has been from perennial habit to <strong>an</strong>nual habit, gregarious habit, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
greater seed production. A detailed description of the phylogenetic<br />
trends in each of these cases is presented below.<br />
Sect. Padia<br />
A compartiave study of species in Sect. Padia indicated O. schlechteri to<br />
be primitive. It is a diploid {2n = 24), has retained a smooth surface of<br />
fertile lemma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> palea with absence of setae, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lacks awns. However,<br />
it occupies <strong>an</strong> adv<strong>an</strong>ced position by virtue of reduction in the spikelet<br />
size <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> setiform sterile lemmas, which may occasionally even be<br />
missing. Therefore, it may be considered <strong>an</strong> early offshoot arising from<br />
the common stock that gave rise to other species of this section.<br />
Compared with O. ridleyi, O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a is more primitive as it is a<br />
diploid (2n = 24). Moreover, the pl<strong>an</strong>ts are rhizomatous <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the spikelets<br />
are awnless. On the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, the sculpturing of fertile lemma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
palea <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> setiform sterile lemmas could be viewed as adv<strong>an</strong>ced<br />
characters. The tr<strong>an</strong>sverse section of fertile lemma indicates a thick b<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>
340 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
of sclerenchymatous tissue that is absent in O. ridleyi (Sharma^ 1964), All<br />
these characters indicate that O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a, though primitive in the<br />
section, is yet highly specialized in its own direction.<br />
O. ridleyi (including O. longiglumis) is represented by comparatively<br />
robust pl<strong>an</strong>ts not met within the Sect. Padia outside Set, Ridley<strong>an</strong>ae. The<br />
p<strong>an</strong>icle morphology is also different from that of O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a (sensu<br />
lato) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. schlechteri. The spikelets are characterized by long glumes<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> awns not met with in the latter two species. The amphidiploid<br />
nature of the species indicates that it has evolved through hybridization<br />
of two different species possessing dissimilar genomes.<br />
O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. ridleyi share m<strong>an</strong>y characters. Both species have<br />
slender culms, thin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> herbaceous leaves, absence of pulvinus at the<br />
base of br<strong>an</strong>ches of the p<strong>an</strong>icle, termination of the axis of the spikelets<br />
with pedicel, straight rachilla, setaceous sterile lemma, sparse hairiness<br />
of fertile lemma, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> long cylindrical caryopsis. The two species are<br />
sympatric <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> prefer shady habitat. Roy (1966) has pointed out m<strong>an</strong>y<br />
similarities between O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 0. ridleyi in the <strong>an</strong>atomy of stem<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leaf as well as in the arr<strong>an</strong>gement of marginal hairs in the leaf blade.<br />
Tateoka (1963) studied the embryo structure in the genus Oryza <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
found that O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a shows characters similar to those of O. ridleyi. It<br />
is, thus probable that one of the genomes of O. ridleyi could be the same<br />
as that of O, meyeri<strong>an</strong>a (Sampath, 1962).<br />
Sect. Angustifolia<br />
O, perrieri exhibits primitive characters such as perennial habit,<br />
nonmucronate fertile lemma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> slender awns. O. tisser<strong>an</strong>ti also shares<br />
these characters. Besides, it is a rhizomatous species. On the other h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>,<br />
O. hrachy<strong>an</strong>tha expresses some of the adv<strong>an</strong>ced traits such as oblique<br />
articulation of the pedicel, comma-shaped rachilla, mucronate fertile<br />
lemma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> robust awns. O. <strong>an</strong>gustifolia closely resembles O. hrachy<strong>an</strong>tha.<br />
O. perrieri <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. tisser<strong>an</strong>ti, therefore, represent a primitive series in Sect.<br />
Angustifolia compared to O. hrachy<strong>an</strong>tha <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. <strong>an</strong>gustifolia, which are<br />
adv<strong>an</strong>ced.<br />
Sect. Oryza<br />
Ser. Latifoliae\ Five species of Ser. Latifoliae occur in Asia. Of these, three<br />
{eichingeri, officinalis, rhizomatis) are diploid having CC <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> DD genomes<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> two {minuta, malampuzhaensis) are tetraploid having the BBCC<br />
genome. Only one species {officinalis) has a wide distribution spreading<br />
from the west coast of India to the Philippines <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> New Guinea. The
S.D. Sharma ei al. 341<br />
other four species are confined to small localities only. The Afric<strong>an</strong><br />
elements of Ser. Latifoliae are represented by two diploid species<br />
{punctata, eichingeri) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> one tetraploid species (schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a). The<br />
two diploid species represent BB <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CC genomes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the tetraploid<br />
species represents the BBCC genome. The diploids {punctata, eichingeri)<br />
are confined to small areas in east <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> central Africa respectively <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
the tetraploid {schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a) is distributed widely frorr\ the Ivory<br />
Coast to Madagascar in that continent. In America^ three species of Ser.<br />
Latifoliae are found <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> all of them are tetraploid^ representing, the<br />
CCDD genome. Of these, O. gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis has a central distribution<br />
whereas O. latifoUa is distributed widely, spreading from the West<br />
Indies <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> southern Mexico up to Peru, Bolivia, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Paraguay. O. alta<br />
occupies <strong>an</strong> intermediate distribution.<br />
It is remarkable that in Asia, a diploid species {ojficinalis) is more<br />
successful in wider distribution th<strong>an</strong> the tetraploids {minuta, malampuzhaensis).<br />
On the contrary, in Africa, the diploid species {eichingeri,<br />
punctata) have restricted distribution <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a tetraploid {schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a)<br />
species is distributed extensively. In America, the diploids are missing<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the three tetraploids are widely distributed.<br />
Ser. Sativae: The Asiatic pl<strong>an</strong>ts of Ser. Sativae are represented by<br />
three species, viz. O. rufipogon,.0. nivara, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O, sativa. Of these, the first<br />
is a perennial species whereas the other two are <strong>an</strong>nual. Various authors<br />
(Porteres, 1950; Richharia, 1960; Morishima et ah, 1961; Sampath, 1962)<br />
have suggested that the perermial species is the most primitive in this<br />
group. The origin of <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>nual species from a perennial one represents a<br />
natural sequence of evolution. This is also true of the other morphological<br />
characters that differentiate O. nivara from O. rufipogon (Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Shastry, 1965a, 1965b). The geographical distribution of O. nivara<br />
(including that of O. meridionalis) is more or less peripheral to that of O.<br />
rufipogon. The wider distribution of O. nivara {including O. meridionalis)<br />
especially in the fringes of O. rufipogon is explained if O. nivara is<br />
assumed to have evolved from O. rufipogon through mutation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
natural selection in the geological past.<br />
The origin of the Asi<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice, O. sativa, has been discussed<br />
in detail in a separate chapter. The origin of the Afric<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice,<br />
O. glaberrima, has been discussed in detail by Porteres (1956). According<br />
to him, this cultivated rice originated in the mont<strong>an</strong>e regions of Senegal.<br />
Secondary centers of origin developed around the Sokoto River in<br />
Nigeria <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Lake Chad. According to Porteres (1956) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mishra <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Misro (1969), the Afric<strong>an</strong> species have been somewhat differentiated<br />
into two groups, termed by them as japonicoides <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> indicoides.<br />
Morishima et al (1962) could not notice <strong>an</strong>y such differentiation. But this<br />
differentiation of O. glaberrima is not as accentuated as that of O. sativa,
342 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
probably because the O, glaberrima did not get variation in altitude as the<br />
O, sativa had to come across during its evolution.<br />
References<br />
A ndrew s, F. W. 1956, The Flowering Pl<strong>an</strong>ts of the Sud<strong>an</strong>, voL III. T. Buncle & Co. Ltd, A rbroath,<br />
Scotl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>.<br />
Bisw al, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sharm a, S.D . 1987. Taxonom y <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> phylogeny oiOryza collina. Oryza 2 4 :24r-29.<br />
Boorham ont, J. 1962. Recherches cytogenetigues chez guelgues hybrids interspecifigues d'<br />
Oryza Cellule 63(1): 52-132.<br />
Cam us, A. 1926. Y vesia, genre nouveau et espèces nouvelles de Gram iness m alagaches. Bull<br />
Sec. BoLFr. 73: 687-691.<br />
Ch<strong>an</strong>g, T.T.. 1985 Crop history <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic conservation: <strong>Rice</strong>-a case study. Iowa State}. Res.<br />
59 (4): 425-456.<br />
Chaterjee, D. 1948. A m odified key <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> num eration of the species of genus Oryza Linn.<br />
Indi<strong>an</strong> /. Agric. Set. 8 :1 8 5 -1 9 2 .<br />
Chevalier, A. 1932. N ouvelle contribution a Tetude system ateque des Oryza. Rev. Bot. Appl.<br />
Agric. Trop. 12; 1014-1032.<br />
Clayton, W .D. 1968. Studies in Gram ineae. XVII. Kew. Bull 21(3): 485-488.<br />
Cordesse, F., G rellet, F., Reddy, A.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> D elseny, M. 1992. Genom e specificity of rDNA<br />
spacer fragm ents from Oryza sativa L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 864-870.<br />
Dally, A.M . <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Second G. 1990. Chlorpolast D N A diversity in w ild <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cultivated species<br />
of rice (Genus Oryza, Section Oryza)'. C ladistic-m utation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic dist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>alysis.<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 209-222.<br />
Deshph<strong>an</strong>e, V.G. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> R<strong>an</strong>jekar, P.K. 1980. Repetitive D N A in three G ram inaeae species with<br />
low DNA content. Hoppe Seyler's Z Physiol Chem. 361:1223-1233.<br />
Dhua, S.R. 1994. Genom e <strong>an</strong>alysis of Oryza rhizomatis Vaughn. Ph.D. Thesis. V isva Bharati,<br />
Sriniket<strong>an</strong>, India.<br />
Ellis, J.L. 1985. Oryza ind<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>am<strong>an</strong>ica Ellis, a new rice pl<strong>an</strong>t from isl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s of Andam <strong>an</strong>s. Bull<br />
Bot. Surv, India 27; 225-227.<br />
Fukui, K., O hm ido, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G,S. 1994. Variability in rDNA loci in the genus Oryza<br />
detected through flourescence in situ hybridisation. Theor. Appl Genet, 87; 893-899.<br />
G opalakrishn<strong>an</strong>, R. 1959.. Cytogenetical studies on interspecific hybrids in the genus Oryza.<br />
A ssociateship thesis, Indi<strong>an</strong> Agric. Res. Inst., New Delhi.<br />
G opalakrishn<strong>an</strong>, R. 1964. Spéciation in Ser. Latifoliae. Unpub. Ph.D. thesis, Indi<strong>an</strong> Agric.<br />
Res. Inst. New Delhi.<br />
G opalakrishn<strong>an</strong>, R. 1965. Subspeciation in Oryza officinalis W all, ex Watt./. Biol. Sci. 8(2): 6 0 -<br />
67.<br />
G opalakrishn<strong>an</strong>, R. 1966. Taxonom ic status of Oryza collina (Trim en) Sharm a et Shastry.<br />
Indi<strong>an</strong> }. Genet. 26(1): 98-100.<br />
Gopalakrishn<strong>an</strong>, R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sam path, S., 1966, The Am eric<strong>an</strong> species of Oryza. Oryza 3 (1): 3 5 -<br />
40.<br />
G opalakrishn<strong>an</strong>, R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sam path, S. 1967. Taxonom ic status <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> origin of A m eric<strong>an</strong><br />
tetraploid species of the series Latifoliae Teteoka in the genus Orym. Indi<strong>an</strong> /. Agric, Sci.<br />
37: 465-475.<br />
Gopalakrishn<strong>an</strong>, R., Sharm a, S.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry, S.V.S. 1965. Genom e cortstitution of Oryza<br />
iiifl/amp/iz/wcMesis Krishn. et Ch<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>r. Cwrr, Sd. 34 (4): 128.
S.D, Sharma et at. 343<br />
G otoh, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O kura, E. 1935. Cytogenetical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetical studies of Orym. jjm .}. Genet. 11<br />
(2 ): 130-131 (in Jap<strong>an</strong>ese).<br />
Grover, A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pental, D. 1992. Interrelationships o f Oryza species based on electrophoretic<br />
patterns of alcohol dehydrogenase. C<strong>an</strong>. /. Bot. 7 0 :3 5 2 -3 5 8 .<br />
H irai, A., Ishibashi, T., M orikam i, A., Iwatsuki, N ., Shinozaki, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sugiura, M . 1985. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
chroroplast D N A; a physical map <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the location of the genes for the large subunit of<br />
ribulose 1, 5-biphosphate carboxylase <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the 32-KDa photosystem II reaction centre<br />
protein. Theor. Appl, Genet. 7 0 :117-122.<br />
H iratsuka, J., Shim ada, H,, W hittier, R., Ishibashi, T., Sakam oto, M ,, M ori, M ., Kondo, C.,<br />
H onji, Y ., Sun, C .R., M eng, B.Y., Li, Y.Q., K <strong>an</strong>no, A., N ishizaw a, Y., H irai, A., Shinozaki,<br />
K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sugiura, M . 1989, The com plete sequence of the rice {Oryza sativa) chloroplast<br />
genom e; inter m olecular recom bination betw een distinct tRNA genes accounts for a<br />
m ajor plastic DNA inversion during evolution of the cereals. Mol, Gen. Genet. 2 1 7 :1 8 5 -<br />
194.<br />
H irayoshi, T. 1937. Species hybrids betw een cultivated rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> w ild rice {Oryza latifoUa)<br />
with special reference to their sterility <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> m aturation division (a prelim inary note)./pM.<br />
/. Genet. 13: 5 9 -6 0 (in Jap<strong>an</strong>ese).<br />
Hu, C.H. 1967, Cytogenetic studies oi Oryza officinalis com plex, II. M eiotic studies of induced<br />
autotreraploids of O, ojficinalis. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sinica 8 (spec, no); 327-338.<br />
H u, C.H . 1970. C ytogenetic studies of O. officinalis com plex. III. The genom ic constitution of<br />
O. punctata <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 0 . eichingeri. Cytologia 35 (2): 304-318.<br />
H ubbard, C.E. 1950. Oryza <strong>an</strong>gustifolia C.E. Hubbard, Hooker's Incones Pl<strong>an</strong>tarum (Fifth Series),<br />
v o l.V . Tabula 3492.<br />
Ichikaw a, H., H irai, A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Katayam , T, 1986. G enetic <strong>an</strong>alysis of Oryza species by m olecular<br />
markers for chloroplast genom es. Theor. Appl. Genet. 72: 353-358.<br />
IRRI. 1964a. <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cyto<strong>genetics</strong>, Elsevier, A m sterdam . 274 pp.<br />
Ishii, J., Brar, D .S., Second, G., Tsunew aki, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G.S. 1995,. N uclear genom e<br />
differentiation in A is<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice as revealed b y RFLP <strong>an</strong>alysis, Jpn. /. Genet. 70:<br />
643-652.<br />
Ishii, T., Terachi, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tsunew aki, K. 1986. Restriction endonuclease <strong>an</strong>alysis o f chloroplast<br />
D N A from cultivated rice species, Oryza sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.glaberrima fpn. J. Genet. 6 1 :5 3 7 -5 4 1 .<br />
Ishii, T., Terachi, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tsunew aki, K. 1988. Restriction endoiiuclease <strong>an</strong>alysis o f chloroplast<br />
D N A from A -genom e diploid species of Oryza. Jpn. J. Genet. 6 3 :5 2 3 -5 3 6 .<br />
Ishii, T., Terachi, T., M ori, N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tsunew aki, K. 1993. Com parative study of the chloroplast,<br />
m itrochondrial <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nuclear genom e differentiation in two cultivated rice species, Oryza<br />
sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. glaberrima by RFLP <strong>an</strong>alysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 88-96.<br />
Jena, K.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Khush, G .S. 1984. Em bryo rescue <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its scope in rice im provem ent. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genet, Newslett. 1:133.<br />
Jena, K.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kochert, G. 1991.. Restriction fragm ent length polym orphism <strong>an</strong>alysis of<br />
C C D D genom e species of the genus Oryza L. Pl<strong>an</strong>t Molec. Biol. 1 6 :8 3 1 -8 3 9 .<br />
K <strong>an</strong>no, A. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> H irai, A. 1992. Com parative studies of the structure of chlorplast DNA from<br />
four species o f Oryza: Cloning <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> physical maps. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 791-798.<br />
Katayam a, T. 1996 a, C ytogenetic studies on the genus Oryza, 2. Chrom osom e pairing in the<br />
interspecific hybrid w ith the A BC genom es. Jpn. J, Genet. 41(4): 307-316.<br />
Katayam a, T. 1966 b, C ytogenetic studies on the genus Oryza, 3. Chrom osom e pairing in the<br />
interspecific hybrid with the A BC genom es. Jpn. J. Genet. 4 1 (4 ); 317-324.<br />
Katayam a, T. 1967. C ytogenetical studies on Oryza P j hybrids of the crosses BBC C x CC,<br />
BBC C X a diploid strain of O. pimcfflfii <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> CC x a diploid strain o f O. punctata. Proc. Jpn.<br />
Acfld,43 (4): 327-331.
344 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
K atayam a, T.C ., A kiham a, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W eliw ita, S.M .P, 1972. D istribu tion <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> som e<br />
m orphological characters of w ild rice in Ceylon. P relim inary R eport of T ottori<br />
U niversity's Scientific Survey (1971) 1 : 60-64.<br />
Kihara, H., Nezu^ M ., Katayama^ T.C ., M atsum ura, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> M abuchi, T. 1961. Genom e <strong>an</strong>alysis<br />
in the genus Oryza, II. Ann. Kept. Natl. Inst. Genet. (Jap<strong>an</strong>) 1 1 :4 0 -4 1 .<br />
Kishim a, Y,, M ikam ii, T ., H irai, A., Sugiura, M. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kinoshita, T. 1987. Beta chlorosplast<br />
genom es; <strong>an</strong>alysis of fraction I protein <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chloroplast DNA variation. Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
73; 330-336.<br />
Laim ert, E. 1965. A survey of the genus Leersia in A frica {Gramineae, Oryzoideae, Oryzeae).<br />
Senck. Biol. 4 6 :1 2 9 -1 5 3 .<br />
Li, H.W . 1964. Studies on genetic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cytogenetic evidence for species relationship in the<br />
Republic of China. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cyto<strong>genetics</strong>, Elsevier, A m sterdam , pp. 118-13.<br />
Li, H .W , W eng, T.S., Chen, C.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W <strong>an</strong>g, W .H. 1961, Cytogenetical studies of Oryza sativa<br />
L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its related species, 1. Hybrids O. pamguaiensis W edd. x O. brachy<strong>an</strong>tha Chev. et<br />
Roehr., O. paraguaiensis W edd. x O. australiensis D om in <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. australiensis D om in x O.<br />
alta Sw allen. Bot. Bull, Acad. Sínica 2; 79-86,<br />
Li, H. W ., W eng, T.S., Chen, C.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W <strong>an</strong>g, W .H. 1962. C ytogenetical studies of Oryza sativa<br />
L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its related species, 2. A. prelim inary note on the interspecific hybrids w ithin the<br />
Section Sativa Roshev. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sínica, 3 :2 0 9 -2 1 9 .<br />
Li, H .W ., Chen, C.C., W eng, T.S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> W uu, K.D. 1963. C ytogenetical studies o f Oryza sativa L.<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its related species, IV. Interspecific crosses involving O. australiensis w ith O. sativa<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. minuta. Bot. Bull, Acad. Sínica 4; 65-74.<br />
Li, H .W ., Chen, C.C., Katherine, C.L., Lu, H.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Hu, C.H. 1964. Pachytene studies o f the<br />
hybrid Oryza sativa x Oryza officinalis. In; <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cyto<strong>genetics</strong>. Elsevier<br />
A m sterdam pp. 141-142.<br />
M cCouch, S.R., Kochert, G., Yu, Z.H., W <strong>an</strong>g, Z.Y,, Khush, G.S. Coffm <strong>an</strong>, W .R. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ksley,<br />
S.D. 1998. M olecular m apping of rice chrom osom es. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76; 815-829,<br />
M ishra, P.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> M isro, B.1969. Postulation of two subspecies in the A fric<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice<br />
{Oryzae glaberriona Steud). Indi<strong>an</strong> J. Agrie. Sci. 39 (10): 966-970.<br />
M orinaga, T. 1940. C ytogenetical studies on Oryza sativa L. IV. T he cyto<strong>genetics</strong> o f F| hybrid<br />
of O. sativa L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. minuta Pres. Jpn.). Bot. 1 1 :1 -1 6 .<br />
M orinaga, T. 1941. C ytogenetical studies on Oryza sativa L., V. The cyto<strong>genetics</strong> o f F j hybird<br />
of O. sativa L. x O. latifolia Desv. )pn. J. Bot. 11:4 6 1 -4 7 8 .<br />
M orinaga, T. 1943. C ytogenetical studies on Oryza sativa, VI. The cyto<strong>genetics</strong> o f F j hybrid of<br />
O. minuta Presl. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. latifolia Desv. Jpn. f. Bot. 12:3 4 7 -3 5 7 .<br />
M orinaga, T. 1959. N ote on genom e <strong>an</strong>alysis inOryza species. Inti. <strong>Rice</strong> Comm. Newslett. 8(3):<br />
10- 11.<br />
M orinaga, T. 1964. Cytogenetical investigation on Oryza species. In; <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
cyto<strong>genetics</strong>. Elsevier A m sterdam , pp. 91-102.<br />
M orinaga, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kuriyam a, H. 1956. C ytogenetical studies on Oryza sativa L., VIII. The F^<br />
hybrids o f O. sativa L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. cubensis Ekm <strong>an</strong>. Jpn. J. Breed. 6; 133-141.<br />
M orinaga, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kuriyam a, H. 1957. O n the interspecific hybrid of O, sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
breviligulata. Jpn. J. Breed (Suppl.) 7:12 (in Jap<strong>an</strong>ese).<br />
M orinaga, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kuriyam a, H. 1959. Genom ic constitution of Oryza officinalis. Jpn J. Breed. 9;<br />
259.<br />
M orinaga, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kuriyam a, H. 1960. Interspecific hybrids <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genom ic constitution of<br />
various species in the genus Oryza. Agrie. Hortic. 35 (5 -8 ): 77B-776,9 3 5 -9 3 8 ,1 0 9 1 -1 0 9 4 ,<br />
1245-1247 (in Jap<strong>an</strong>ese).<br />
M orinaga, T., Kuriyam a, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O no, S. 1960. O n the interspecific hybrid of Oryiui minuta<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. australiensis. (Abs.) Jpn. J. Genet. 3 5 :2 7 8 (in Jap<strong>an</strong>ese).
S.D. Sharma et al. 345<br />
Morinaga, T., Kuriyama, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ono, S. 1962. Oryza gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumts <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its interspecific<br />
hybrids. (Abs.) Jpn. /. Breed. 12 : 61. (in Jap<strong>an</strong>ese).<br />
Morishima, H. 1984. Wild pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> domestication. In: Biology of <strong>Rice</strong>, S. Tsunoda <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> N.<br />
Takahashi (eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam pp. 3~30.<br />
Morishima, H., Oka, H.L <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g, W.T. 1961. Direction of differentiation in populations<br />
of wild rice O. perennis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. sativa f. spont. Evolution 15; 326-339.<br />
Morishima, H., Hinata, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Oka, H.1.1962. Comparison between two cultivated rice, 0.<br />
sativa L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. glaberrima Steud. Jpn. J. Breed. 12(3): 153-165.<br />
N<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>i, H.K. 1938. Interspecific hybridisation of Oryza, I. Cytogenetical evidence of the<br />
hybrid origin of Oryza minuta Presl. Tr<strong>an</strong>s. Bose Res. Inst., Calcutta 11 (1935-36) : 99-121,<br />
Nezu, M., Katayama, T.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kihara, H. 1960. Genetic study of genus Oryza, I. Crossability<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> chromosomal affinity among 17 species. Seiken Ziho 11:1-11.<br />
Ng, N.Q., Hawkes, J.G., William, J.T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g, T.T. 1981. The recognition of a new species<br />
of rice {Oryza) from Australia. Bot.}. Linn. Soc. 82:327-330.<br />
Nowick, E.M. 1986. Chromosome pairing in Oryza satim L. x O, latifolia Desv. hybrids.<br />
C<strong>an</strong>adi<strong>an</strong> J. Genet, Cytol. 28(2): 278-281.<br />
Ogihara, Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tsunewaki, K. 1988. Diversity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> evolution of chloroplast DNA inTriticum<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Aegilops as revealed by restriction fragment <strong>an</strong>alysis, Tfieor. Appl. Genet. 76:321^32.<br />
Pilger, R. 1914, Neu und weniger bek<strong>an</strong>nte Gramineen aus Papuasien. Bot<strong>an</strong>. Jahrb. 52:167-<br />
176.<br />
Porteras, R. 1950. Primitive at progrès d<strong>an</strong>s l'évolution a sein due genre Oryza. Rev. Bot.<br />
Appl. Agric. Trop. 30: 604-610.<br />
Porteras, R. 1956. Taxonomie agrobot<strong>an</strong>igue dez riz cultives: O. sativa Linné et O.glaherrina<br />
Steudel. J. Agric. Trop. Bot. Appl. 3; 341-384,541-580,627-700,821-856.<br />
Prodoehl, A. 1922. Oryzeae monographice discribuntur B of. Arch. 1:211-224,231-256.<br />
Qi<strong>an</strong>, H.R., Zhu<strong>an</strong>g J.Y., Lin, H.X., Lu, J. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Zheng, K.L. 1995. Identification of a set of RFLP<br />
probes for subspecies differentiation in Oryza sativa L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90; 878-884.<br />
Ram<strong>an</strong>uj<strong>an</strong>, S. 1937. Cytogenetical studies in the Oryzae, III. Cytogenetical behaviour of <strong>an</strong><br />
interspecific hybrid in Oryza. J. Genet. 35:223-258.<br />
Richard, B, Moequot, B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Fournier, A„ et al, 1986. Expression of alcohol dehydrogenease<br />
in rice embryos under <strong>an</strong>oxia Pl<strong>an</strong>t Mol. Biol. 7:321-329.<br />
Richharia, R.H, 1960. Origin of cultivated rices. Indi<strong>an</strong> }. Genet. 20 (1); 1-14.<br />
Roschevicz, R.J. 1931. A contribution to the knowledge of rice. Appl. Bot. Genet. PI. Breed. Bull.<br />
27 (4): 3-133.<br />
Roy, J.K. 1966. Anatomical studies in genus Oryza. V. Interrelationship of some Oryza<br />
species as shown by <strong>an</strong>atomical characters. Oryza 3(1): 86-95.<br />
Sampath, S. 1962. The genus Oryza: its taxonomy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> species relationship Oryza 1(1): 1-29.<br />
Sampath, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Subram<strong>an</strong>yam, M.D. 1968. The taxonomy of a wild Orym species from<br />
Ceylon. Oryza-5 (1): 75-76,<br />
Second, G. 1982. Origin of the genic diversity of cultivated rice {Oryza spp.); Study of the<br />
polymorphism scored at 40.isozyme loci, Jpn. J. Genet. 57:25-57.<br />
Second, G. 1984. A new insight into the genome differentiation in Oryza L. through isozyme<br />
studies. In: Adv<strong>an</strong>ces in Chromosome <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cell Genetics. A.K. Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> A. Sharma, (eds.).<br />
Oxford <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IBH Press, New Delhi, pp, 45-78.<br />
Shama Rao, H.K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Seetharam<strong>an</strong>, R. 1955. An interspecific hybrid in Oryza. Curr. Sei. 24<br />
346-347.<br />
Sharma, S.D. 1964. Interspecific relationships in genus Oryza. Unpuble. Ph.D. Thesis, Indi<strong>an</strong><br />
Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.
346 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Sharma, S.D. 1986. Evolutionary trends in genus Oryza. In; <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics, IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila,<br />
Philippines, pp. 59-67.<br />
Sharma, S.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sampath, S, 1985. Taxonomy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> species realtionship. In; <strong>Rice</strong> Research iw<br />
India, KAR, New Delhi, pp. 21-43.<br />
Sharma, S.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry, S.V.S. 1965a. Taxonomic studies in genus Oryza, III. O. rufipogon<br />
Griff, sensu stricto <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. nivara Sharma et Shastry nom. nov. Indi<strong>an</strong> J. Genet. 25 (2) : 157-<br />
165.<br />
Sharma, S.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry, S.V.S. 1965b. Taxonomic stitdies in genus Oryz«, IV. The Ceylonese<br />
Oryzrt spp. affin. O, Wall, ex Watt- Indi<strong>an</strong> J. Genet. 25 (2) ; 168-172.<br />
Sharma, S.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry, S.V.S. 1965c. Taxonomic studies in genus Oryza, VI. A modified<br />
classification of the genus. Indi<strong>an</strong> /. Genet. 25 (2): 173-178.<br />
Sharma, S.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry, S.V.S. 1966. Taxonomic studies in genus Oryza. V. Sclerophyllum<br />
coearctatum (Roxb) Griff. Bull. Bot. Surv. India 8:42-44.<br />
Sharma, S.D., Subba Rao, G. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rao, V.J.M., Cytology of Oryza officinalis (4n) x O. latifolia.<br />
Curr. Sci. 43:585-586.<br />
Sharma, S.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry, S.V.S. 1971. Phylogenetic studies in genus Oryza, I. Primitive <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
adv<strong>an</strong>ced characters. Riso 20(2): 127-136.<br />
Shastry, S.V.S. 1965. Genomic differentiation in the genus Oryza, Indi<strong>an</strong> J. Genet. 26A: 258-<br />
; 271. .<br />
Shastry, S.V.S., Sharma, S.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> R<strong>an</strong>ga Rao, D.R. 1961. Pachytene <strong>an</strong>alysis of Oryza, III.<br />
Meiosis in <strong>an</strong> intersectional hyrbid, O. sativa x O. officinalis. Nucleus 4 ; 67-80.<br />
Smith, J.S.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Smith, O.S, 1990. Fingerprinting crop varieties. Adv. Agron. 47 ; 85-140.<br />
Tateoka, T. 1962a. Taxonomic studies oî Oryza, I. O. latifolia complex. Bof. Mag. 7 5 :418-427.<br />
Tateoka, T. 1962b. Taxonomic studies of Oryza, II. Several species complexes. Bof. Mag, 75:<br />
455-461.<br />
Tateoka, T. 1963. Taxonomic studies of Oryza, III. Key to the species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their enumeration.<br />
Bof. Mag. 76:165-173.<br />
Tateoka, T. 1964. Report of Explorations in East Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Madagascar. National Science<br />
Museum, Tokyo 16 pp.<br />
Vaugh<strong>an</strong>, D.A. 1989. The genus Orym L. Current status of taxonomy. IRRI Research paper<br />
Series 138:1-21.<br />
Vaugh<strong>an</strong>, D,A. 1994. The Wild Relatives of <strong>Rice</strong>: A Genetic Resource H<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>book. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila,<br />
Phlippines, 137 pp,<br />
Vaugh<strong>an</strong>, D.A., Feral, P. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Gerogo G. 1991. A preliminary note on Oryza schlechteri. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genet. Newslett. 8: 75-76.<br />
W<strong>an</strong>g, Z.Y., Second G. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ksely, S.D. 1991. Polymorphism <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> phylogenetic<br />
relationships among species in the genus Oryza as determined by <strong>an</strong>alysis of nuclear<br />
RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:565-581,<br />
Wat<strong>an</strong>abe, Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ono, S. 1965, Cytogenetic studies on the artificial polyploids in the genus<br />
Oryza 1. Colchicine induced octoploid pl<strong>an</strong>ts of Oryza latifolia Desv. |pn, J. Breed. 15(3);<br />
149-157,<br />
Wat<strong>an</strong>abe, Y. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ono, S. 1966, Cytogenetic studies on the artificial polyploids in the genus<br />
Oryza, 2. Colchicine induced octopolyploid of Oryza minuta Presl. Jpn. J. Breed. 16 (4):<br />
220-230.<br />
Yeh, B, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Henderson, M.T. 1961, Cytogenetic relationship between cultivated rice, Oryza<br />
sativa L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> five wild diploid forms of Oryza. Crop, Sci. 1:445-450.<br />
Yeh, B, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Henderson, M.T. 1962, Cytogenetic relationship between Afric<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>nual diploid<br />
species of Oryza <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cultivated rice, O, sativa L. Crop Sci. 2 (6): 463-467,<br />
Zhao, X., Wu, T,, Xie, Y, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Wu, R, 1989. Genome specific repetitive squences in the genus<br />
Oryza. Theor, Appl. Genet, 78; 201-209.
S.D. Sharma et al. 347<br />
Zheng, K., Qi<strong>an</strong>, H., Shen, B., Zhu<strong>an</strong>g, J., Lin, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Lu, J, 1994. RFLP based phylogenetic<br />
<strong>an</strong>alysis of wide compatibility varieties in Otyza sativa L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:65-69.<br />
Zhou, G.Y. 1986. Dist<strong>an</strong>tly related hybridisation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic engineering of crops. In: <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genetics. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 867-876.<br />
Sipecies<br />
O. alta Swallen<br />
O. <strong>an</strong>gustifoUa C.E. Hubbard<br />
O. australiensis Domin<br />
O. barthii A. Chev.<br />
(Syn. O. breviligulata<br />
A. Chev. et Roehr.)<br />
O. hrachy<strong>an</strong>tha A. Chev. et Roehr.<br />
O. eichingeri A. Peter<br />
O, glaherrima Steud.<br />
O. glumaepetula Steud.<br />
(Syn. O. cubensis Ekm<strong>an</strong>)<br />
O. gr<strong>an</strong>úlala Nees et<br />
Arn. ex Hook. f.<br />
O. latifoHa Desv,<br />
O. longiglumis J<strong>an</strong>sen<br />
O. longistaminata A. Chev. et Roehr<br />
O. meridionalis Ng<br />
O. meyeri<strong>an</strong>a<br />
(Zoll, et Mor. ex Steud.)Baill<br />
O. minuta J.S. Presl ex C.B, Presl<br />
O. nivara Sharma et Shas try<br />
O. officinalis Wall, ex Watt<br />
O. perrieri A. Camus<br />
O. punctata Kotschy ex Steud.<br />
O. ridleyi Hook. f.<br />
O. rufipogon Griff.<br />
O. sativa L.<br />
O. schlechten Pilger<br />
O. schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a Prod.<br />
O. tisser<strong>an</strong>ti A. Chev.<br />
Appendix<br />
Species of O ryza <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their geographic distribution<br />
Distribution<br />
Central <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> South America<br />
South Africa<br />
Australia<br />
West Africa<br />
West <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> central Africa<br />
East Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sri Lcinka<br />
Tropical West Africa<br />
Tropical America <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> West Indies<br />
South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia<br />
Central <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> South America<br />
New Guinea<br />
Tropical Africa<br />
Tropical Australia<br />
Southeast Asia<br />
The Philippines<br />
South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia<br />
South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia<br />
Madagascar<br />
East Africa<br />
Southeast Asia<br />
South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia<br />
South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia<br />
New Guinea<br />
Tropical Africa<br />
Central Africa
15<br />
Origin of O. sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Its<br />
Ecotypes<br />
S,D. Sharma\ Smita Tripathy^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jyostnamayee Biswal^<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The origin of the Asi<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice {Orym sativa L.) has been a<br />
debated subject ever since De C<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>olle (1882) opened this topic for<br />
scientific discussion. However, as more <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more data <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> evidence<br />
have accumulated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> our underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing of the subject has become<br />
increasingly clear, finer details have come up for discussion. The salient<br />
contributions in this field have come from Watt (1891), Roschevicz (1931),<br />
Ramiah <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ghose (1951), Sampath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rao (1951), Richharia (I960),<br />
Sampath (1962), Sharma (1964), Oka (1964, 1974, 1988), Shastry <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Sliarma (1973), Ch<strong>an</strong>g (1976), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Morishima (1984). The authors of this<br />
paper have tried to present a new as well as comprehensive hypothesis<br />
about the origin of Asi<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice {Oryza sativa) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its ecotypes,<br />
based mainly on their own findings during the last ten years <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> have<br />
cited others' contributions in support (For citation of authors for the<br />
binomials used in this paper, please see the Appendix).<br />
There are two cultivated species of rice: O. sativa, which was<br />
domesticated in South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia, is now widely cultivated in all<br />
the rice-growing areas of the world, while O. glaberrima, which was<br />
domesticated in tropical west Africa has remained coniined to that part of<br />
^M. S. Swaminath<strong>an</strong> Research Foundation, Chennai - 600 113<br />
^ Jayadev College, Naharak<strong>an</strong>ta, Bhub<strong>an</strong>eswar - 752101
350 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
the world. In fact, the Asi<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice (O. saliva) is now so widely<br />
cultivated in the homel<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> of O. glaberrima that the former may edge out<br />
the latter sooner or later. Morphologically, the two cultivated species not<br />
only look very similar but also show parallel variation. Cytogenetically,<br />
these two species are diploid, have the same chromosome number (2n =<br />
24) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> also the same genomic constitution (AA), although they differ at<br />
the subgenomic level (Yeh arid Henderson, 1961; IRRI, 1964b). The<br />
hybrids of the two species are highly sterile.<br />
The situation in the two cultivated species is vicarious as each has a<br />
closely related <strong>an</strong>nual wild species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> also a perennial wild species.<br />
Besides, each of the two cultivated species hybridizes in nature with its<br />
<strong>an</strong>nual wild relative forming partially fertile hybrids. However, the<br />
situation differs with regard to the relation of the cultivated species with<br />
their perermial wild species. In Asia, the cultivated species (O. saliva)<br />
frequently hybridizes in nature with its perennial wild relative (O.<br />
rufipogon) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> forms partially fertile hybrids. In Africa, the cultivated<br />
species (O. glaberrima) rarely hybridizes in nature with its perennial wild<br />
relative (O. longistaminaia) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the hybrids, if made artificially, are<br />
highly sterile.<br />
A perennial wild species allied to O. rufipogon of Asia is widely<br />
distributed in tropical America. This has been treated as a distinct <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
different species by m<strong>an</strong>y biosystematists (Yeh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Henderson, 1961;<br />
Sharma, 1964; Ch<strong>an</strong>g, 1985) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> has been referred to as O. cubensis, a<br />
nomen nudum, by Yeh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Henderson (1961) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> as O. glumaepetula by<br />
Sharma (1964) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g (1985). It has been considered a mere vari<strong>an</strong>t of<br />
the Asi<strong>an</strong> perennial species (O, rufipogon) by Tateoka (1962) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Vaugh<strong>an</strong> (1994). Both these taxa have the same number of chromosomes<br />
{2n = 24) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the same genome (AA) but differ subgenomically (Yeh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Henderson, 1961; IRRI, 1964b).<br />
It may also be mentioned that during the 1950s <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 1960s, m<strong>an</strong>y of<br />
the rice biosystematists treated the perennial elements of Asia<br />
{rufipogon), Africa (longistaminaia) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> America (glumaepetula) as a single<br />
species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> identified it as O. peren,nis Moench following Chevalier (1932)<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chatter] ee (1948). According to this view, the perennial elements of<br />
the three continents are treated as three subspecies of a single species O,<br />
perennis (IRRI, 1964a). In this paper, the binomial O. perennis is<br />
discarded, as suggested by Tateoka (1962), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the three elements are<br />
treated as three distinct species.<br />
TAXONOMIC DELIMITATION AND NOMENCLATURE<br />
The Asi<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice (O. saliva) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its allied taxa that occur in Asia<br />
present a continuous array of morphological features, so much so that
S.D. Sharma et al. 351<br />
the whole group was termed the O. sativa complex by Tateoka (1962). A<br />
better underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing of this group has been gained slowly during the<br />
last one hundred years. The first taxon of tins group to be recognized<br />
was the cultivated rice named O. sativa by Linnaeus (1753). Early<br />
taxonomists <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> flora writers (Hooker, 1897) considered these wild<br />
relatives of O. sativa merely its vari<strong>an</strong>ts. Subsequently, the wild elements<br />
were assigned infraspecific r<strong>an</strong>ks within O. sativa. For example, Prain<br />
(1903) designated them as O. sativa va.vfatua <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Roschevicz (1931) as O.<br />
sativa f. spont<strong>an</strong>ea.<br />
Chatterjee (1948) recognized three species—a perennial wild, <strong>an</strong><br />
<strong>an</strong>nual wild, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the <strong>an</strong>nual cultivated (O. sativa)— for this complex in<br />
Asia. He identified the perennial wild species as O. perennis Moench <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
called the <strong>an</strong>nual wild species provisionally O. sativa L. var. fatua Prain<br />
pending its correct identification. Ramiah <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ghose (1951) followed<br />
Chatterjee (1948) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> also recognized three species in this complex—a<br />
perennial wild, <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>nual wild, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the <strong>an</strong>nual cultivated species. They<br />
referred to these three species as O. perennis, O. fatua, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. sativa<br />
respectively. Sampath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rao (1951), however, held the view that the<br />
Asi<strong>an</strong> elements of the O. sativa complex consist of a perennial wild<br />
species (their O. perennis) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the <strong>an</strong>nual , cultivated species (O. sativa)<br />
only. According to them, the <strong>an</strong>nual wild types of this complex are<br />
natural hybrids between the perennial wild species (their O. perennis)<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the armual cultivated rice (O. sativa). They referred to the natural<br />
hybrids as O. sativa var. spont<strong>an</strong>ea. However, their view was, based on<br />
observations of the taxa in coastal Orissa only.<br />
Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry (1965a, 1965b) extensively collected various<br />
forms of these wild rices from a wide region in India, studied their<br />
morphology, single pl<strong>an</strong>t progenies, ecology, proximity to the cultivated<br />
rice fields <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> geographic distribution. They recognized four distinct<br />
elements in the O. sativa complex of India: (a) a perennial wild species O.<br />
rufipogon (Bor, 1960; Tateoka, 1962), (b) <strong>an</strong> armual wild species named O.<br />
nivara in the absence of a valid name (Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry, 1965b, 1966);<br />
(c) the <strong>an</strong>nual cultivated species 0 . sativa, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> (d) products of natural<br />
hybridization between the wild species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the cultivated species. These<br />
natural hybrids were further divided into two subgroups, (i) hybrids<br />
between O. rufipogon <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. sativa, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> (ii) hybrids between O. nivara<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. sativa. The classification of the O. sativa complex of South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Southeast Asia into three distinct species {rufipogon, nivara, sativa) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
two forms of natural hybrids {sativa x rufipogon, sativa x nivara)<br />
necessitates a reexamination of the morphological characters <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
ecological preferences of each of these species.
352 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
O. R u fip o g o n<br />
O. rufipogon is a perennial species growing in swamps (stable habitat). It<br />
survives in the drier seasons as clumps due to the presence of sufficient<br />
moisture in the soil <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> regenerates itself in the monsoon season when<br />
the depth of water rises. The culms br<strong>an</strong>ch <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subbr<strong>an</strong>ch at nodes<br />
piercing through the leaf sheath (extravaginal br<strong>an</strong>ching). When the<br />
water is too shallow (less th<strong>an</strong> 15 cm), the culm becomes a runner,<br />
rooting at nodes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> spreading horizontally on the ground. In deeper<br />
water, the br<strong>an</strong>ches <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subbr<strong>an</strong>ches remain suspended in water. The<br />
leaves are generally at a right <strong>an</strong>gle to the culm. P<strong>an</strong>icles are well<br />
exserted <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> erect when emerging from the surface of water. The<br />
br<strong>an</strong>ches of the p<strong>an</strong>icle are open, lax, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> may be slightly drooping. The<br />
spikelets are slender, <strong>an</strong>thers are long, filling the spikelet completely,<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the stigma protrudes, favoring cross-pollination. The leaf sheath,<br />
apiculus, awn, the <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stigma are pigmented. A detailed morphological<br />
description of this species is available in Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry (1965b).<br />
O. rufipogon is a photoperiod-sensitive species flowering during<br />
November-December. It grows along the margins of ponds <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> lakes<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the sides of roads <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> railway tracks if they are swampy. It is<br />
distributed in the coastal plains of India <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> also occurs in the lower<br />
basins of the G<strong>an</strong>ga <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Brahmaputra <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their tributaries <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
distributaries. Outside India, it is reported to occur in southern China,<br />
Southeast Asia, Indonesia, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> New Guinea. Forms similar to O.<br />
rufipogon but having larger leaves, greater ramification of p<strong>an</strong>icles, larger<br />
number of spikelets per p<strong>an</strong>icle, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> somewhat larger spikelets are also<br />
available in nature due to introgression of characters from O. sativa into<br />
O. rufipogon.<br />
O. N ivara<br />
Compared with O. rufipogon, O, nivara is shorter in height <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
semispreading at the vegetative stage but semierect at maturity. It grows<br />
in shallow seasonal ditches that dry off in summer. The pl<strong>an</strong>ts are armual<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> germinate from self-sown seeds during the rainy season. The new<br />
br<strong>an</strong>ches appear from the lower nodes only <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grow inside (<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> parallel<br />
to) the leaf sheath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> come out at the point of the collar (intravaginal<br />
br<strong>an</strong>ching). The leaves are semiopen <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> not so drooping as in 0 .<br />
rufipogon. The p<strong>an</strong>icle is poorly exserted or even partly inserted. The<br />
number of primary <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> secondary br<strong>an</strong>ches per p<strong>an</strong>icle is less compared<br />
to O. rufipogon. The rachis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the br<strong>an</strong>ches of the p<strong>an</strong>icle are stiffer. The<br />
spikelets are shorter but bolder. The awns are longer <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more robust.<br />
The pigmentation in pl<strong>an</strong>t parts shows much variation. The leaf sheath.
apiculus^ stigma, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> awn may or may not be pigmented. This has been<br />
described in detail by Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry (1965b).<br />
O. nivara is a photoperiod-insensitive species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> flowers during<br />
September-October. It is found in small populations in seasonal ditches<br />
in northern India as well as in the Decc<strong>an</strong> plateau. Its occurrence in<br />
B<strong>an</strong>gladesh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> northeast India is rare. Outside India, it is reported to be<br />
distributed in the plateau regions of My<strong>an</strong>mar, Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, Cambodia,<br />
Laos, south <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> southwestern region of mainl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> China, especially in<br />
Gu<strong>an</strong>gxi province <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its adjoining areas (Shao et ah, 1986).<br />
O. sativa<br />
S.D. Sharma et al. 353<br />
The special feature of O. sativa is that it has differentiated into several<br />
ecogenetic groups <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> subgroups, which have been called by Morinaga<br />
(1968) ecospecies <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ecotypes. Summarizing the works of earlier<br />
workers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> his own studies, he recognized four ecospecies, namely<br />
japónica, jav<strong>an</strong>ica, aus, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> am<strong>an</strong> (indica) within this species. The other<br />
types discussed in this paper are: (a) the primitive l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> races of Jeypore<br />
tract of Orissa (Sampath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Govindaswami, 1958; Oka <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g<br />
1962) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> referred to as southeast Indi<strong>an</strong> hill rices or by their acronym<br />
"seihr'O (b) the japonica-like forms that occur in the sub-Himalay<strong>an</strong><br />
region of Nepal, Sikkim, Bhut<strong>an</strong>, Arunachal Pradesh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> southwestern<br />
provinces of mainl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> China; (c) the hill rices of mainl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia<br />
that are closely related to jav<strong>an</strong>ica types (Ch<strong>an</strong>g, 1986; Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Arraudeau, 1986) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> referred to by their acronym "hfmsea"; (d) the<br />
tjereh types of Indonesia that resemble am<strong>an</strong> types of India, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> (e) the<br />
shali ecotype of the Brahmaputra valley that ecologically <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
agronomically corresponds with the am<strong>an</strong> type of Bengal.<br />
It is also remarkable that some of the ecotypes of O. sativa are<br />
photoperiod insensitive while the others are photoperiod sensitive.<br />
Futher, the Asi<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice is not <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>nual species in the strict sense<br />
as m<strong>an</strong>y of its cultivars have the capability to ratoon or regenerate <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in<br />
this sense have the capability to perennate.<br />
Natural Hybrids<br />
The genetic barrier between either of the wild species (O. rufipogon <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
O. nivara) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the cultivated species (O. sativa) is incomplete. This has<br />
led to introgressive hybridization in both directions <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> occurrence of all<br />
forms of intergrades in nature. Consequently, the taxonomic distinctness<br />
of the three species in nature is blurred <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the whole group appears as a<br />
species complex, which was named the O. sativa complex by Tateoka<br />
(1962).
354 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
In the coastal plains of India <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in the lower valleys of the G<strong>an</strong>ga<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Brahmaputra^ O. sativa gets crossed with O. rufipogon <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> forms<br />
natural hybrids. In the Decc<strong>an</strong> plateau O. sativa hybridizes in nature<br />
with O. nivara to form natural hybrids. These natural hybrids have been<br />
referred to as spont<strong>an</strong>ea rices in rice literature. The spont<strong>an</strong>ea rices that<br />
invade the rice fields are products of natural hybridization between O.<br />
sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 0 . nivara (in plateau regions) or between O. sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
rufipogon (in coastal regions) followed by repeated backcrosses with O.<br />
sativa. As a result^ the spont<strong>an</strong>ea rices which grow in the cultivated<br />
fields closely resemble the cultivated rice except for shattering of<br />
spikelets at maturity with or without a few other wild characters such as<br />
black husk^ red kerneb presence of awn, etc. Efforts by farmers to<br />
identify them at the vegetative stage <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> weed them out from the<br />
cultivated fields have acted as a selection pressure for their closer<br />
resembl<strong>an</strong>ce to the cultivated rice (Oka <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g, 1959).<br />
ORIGIN OF CULTIVATED RICE<br />
Earlier Views<br />
Early rice workers held the view that O, sativa mainly originated from<br />
wild species of the O. sativa complex. However, as taxonomic<br />
delimitation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> nomenclature of the elements of this complex were not<br />
clear, various authors (see reference this paper) adopted different<br />
binomials. However, they held the view that, besides species of the O.<br />
sativa complex, some other wild species might also have played a role in<br />
the origin of some of the cultivars of O. sativa. In other words, they<br />
assumed that the Asi<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice had a polyphyletic origin. Among<br />
the various putative progenitors, O. officinalis has received the most<br />
serious consideration as this species has well-ramified p<strong>an</strong>icles, high<br />
number of spikelets per p<strong>an</strong>icle, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> small-size grains— characters not<br />
met with in either O. nivara or O. rufipogon but present in O. sativa.<br />
Father more, the distribution of O. officinalis is sympatric with that of O.<br />
sativa. However, the two species are ecologically isolated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hence do<br />
not hybridize in nature. Besides, the synthesized Fj hybrids are highly<br />
sterile. Although both the species are diploid (2n = 24), their<br />
chromosomes either do not pair during meiosis (Ram<strong>an</strong>ujam, 1938) or<br />
pair but separate out before metaphase-I without forming chiasmata<br />
(Shastry et al., 1961). The genomic constitution of the two species differs<br />
(O. sativa = A A, O. officinalis = CC or DD?). Any role of O. officinalis in<br />
the origin of O. sativa, therefore, seems improbable. Because of<br />
morphological similarities between O. officinalis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. minuta, the latter<br />
was also assumed to have played a role in the origin of O. sativa.
S.D. Sharma et a l 355<br />
However^ as O. minuta is a tetraploid species (2n = 48) with a different<br />
genomic constitution (BBCC) occurring only in the Philippines^ it could<br />
not have played <strong>an</strong>y role in the origin of O, sativa.<br />
Another species considered to have played some role in the origin of<br />
O. sativa was Porteresia coarctata. Until 1965, it was treated as a species of<br />
the genus Oryza only <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> was known as Oryza coarctata. It grows in the<br />
tidal swamps near sea coasts of South Asia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> was assumed to have<br />
played a role in the origin of salinity toler<strong>an</strong>t cultivars of O, sativa. Its<br />
role in the origin of O. sativa was ruled out when it was found to be a<br />
tetraploid (2n = 48) species.<br />
Chatterjee (1951) presented a classical view on the origin of<br />
cultivated rice. According to him, the <strong>an</strong>nual wild species (our O, nivara)<br />
played the major role in the origin of cultivated rice though he did not<br />
rule out the role of O. officinalis. Ramiah <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ghose (1951) recognized<br />
three species in the O. sativa complex of Asia, namely, a perennial wild<br />
species (their O. perennis Moench), <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>nual wild species (their O.fatua<br />
Koenig), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the cultivated rice (O. sativa) following Chatterjee (1951).<br />
According to them, the aimual wild species is the progenitor of the<br />
cultivated species. Ramiah <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ghose (1951) were the first rice scientists<br />
to attract the attention of other rice scientists to the Jeypore tract of<br />
Orissa as "this area might form <strong>an</strong>other independent center of origin"<br />
(Ramiah, 1953).<br />
Sampath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rao (1951) treated the perennial wild species of Asia<br />
(rufipogon), Africa {longistaminata), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> America (glumaepetula) a s ' a<br />
single species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> called it O. perennis Moench, as suggested earlier by<br />
Chevalier (1932) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chatterjee (1948). They proposed that the peretmial<br />
form of Africa (our longistaminata) has given rise to O. glaberrima in<br />
tropical west Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that of Asia (our rufipogon) has given rise to O.<br />
sativa in South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia. According to them, each of the two<br />
forms of O. perennis hybridize in nature with their cultivated<br />
counterparts (O. sativa in Asia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. glaberrima in Africa) to form<br />
natural hybrids. Tn other words, Sampath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rao (1951) proposed a<br />
monophyletic origin for cultivated rices of Africa as well as Asia, which<br />
was elaborated by Richharia (1960) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sampath (1962). The perennis<br />
hypothesis was supported by Oka (1964,1974,1988) who amassed further<br />
evidence of natural hybridization between O. rufipogon (their O. perennis)<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the cultivated rice (O. sativa) in Asia. However, he did not support<br />
Sampath's view that the perennial form of Africa [longistaminata) has<br />
given rise to O. glaberrima in Africa or the view that these two species<br />
frequently hybridize in nature to produce hybrid populations. Sampath<br />
(1962) himself recognized the Asi<strong>an</strong> (rufipogon) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Afric<strong>an</strong><br />
(longistaminata) perennial rices as two distinct <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> different species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
in this sense demolished his own hypothesis of monophyletic origin of<br />
f i
356 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics; Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
cultivated rices. Later, Sampath (1962, 1964b) recognized the existence<br />
of <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>nual wild species in South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia but defined it as<br />
the fixed forms of natural hybrids between the perennial species (his<br />
perennis) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the cultivated species {sativa). Lately, Morishima (1984)<br />
has partially modified the perennis hypothesis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> has suggested that<br />
forms intermediate between the perennial <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the <strong>an</strong>nual types of wild<br />
rices might have given rise to the cultivated rices.<br />
The Nivara Hypothesis<br />
Sampath (1962) proposed the perennial species (our O. rufipogon) as the<br />
progenitor. This was based mainly on his field observations in coastal<br />
Orissa, where the armual species {nivara) does not occur <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> all the<br />
<strong>an</strong>nual wild forms of the O. sativa complex occurring in this area are the<br />
product of natural hybridization between O. rufipogon <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. sativa.<br />
However, the recognition of a distinct <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> different <strong>an</strong>nual species well<br />
distributed over the vast plateau regions of South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia led<br />
Sharma (1964) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sharma (1973) to propose that the<br />
cultivated rice (sativa) of Asia originated from the <strong>an</strong>nual wild species<br />
(nivara). According to them, perennial wild to <strong>an</strong>nual wild <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>niual<br />
wild to <strong>an</strong>nual cultivated must have been the natural <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> logical<br />
sequence of evolution <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, therefore, the <strong>an</strong>nual wild species must have<br />
been the progeny (<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> not the progenitor) of the perennial wild species.<br />
Sharma (1964) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sharma (1973) resurrected the views of<br />
Ramiah <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ghose (1951) with additional evidence, precise taxonomic<br />
delimitations, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> valid nomenclature (Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry, 1965a,<br />
1965b, 1966a).<br />
O, nivara is <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>nual species which grows in shallow seasonal<br />
ditches, Compared with O. rufipogon^ it is more gregarious <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
frugiferous, flowers more synchronously, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> has bolder spikelets <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
kernels. Early m<strong>an</strong> settled <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> developed agriculture in drier regions (not<br />
in swamps). It is therefore highly probable that early m<strong>an</strong> relied upon O.<br />
nivara (not O. rufipogon) for developing a grain crop. O. nivara is<br />
"harvested" in large qu<strong>an</strong>tities even today by tribal <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> economically<br />
backward people of central India for self-consumption as well as for<br />
marketing at a premium price as religious people prefer to consume this<br />
"God-given rice" (deohhat) on days of fasting.<br />
The nivara hypothesis proposed by Sharma (1964) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Sharma (1973) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> elaborated by Ch<strong>an</strong>g (1976) was, however, too simple<br />
to account for all the morphological, ecological, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> physiological<br />
variations available in O. sativa. Furthermore, it does not account for the<br />
ecogenetic differentiation in O. sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its interecotypic sterility.
S.D. Sharma et al. 357<br />
RECENT STUDIES<br />
Biswal (1988) crossed various collections of O. nivara of India among<br />
themselves <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> observed increasing Pj pollen sterility with increasing<br />
spatial separation of nivara populations. She/ therefore, concluded that<br />
the pollen sterility observed in the Fi hybrids between japónica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
indica was already present in the progenitor species (O. nivara) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> has<br />
merely been carried forward to the progeny species (O. sativa). When<br />
collections of O. nivara were crossed with O. rufipogon, the hybrids<br />
were more fertile th<strong>an</strong> m<strong>an</strong>y of the nivara x nivara hybrids. When O.<br />
nivara was crossed with various ecotypes of O. sativa, she observed that<br />
(with regard to pollen fertility) aus x nivara <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica x nivara hybrids<br />
behaved more or less like nivara x nivara hybrids. The am<strong>an</strong> x nivara <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
jav<strong>an</strong>ica x nivara hybrids behaved like rufipogon x nivara hybrids. This<br />
led her to conclude that (a) aus <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica ecotypes have originated<br />
directly from two different populations of O. nivara, (b) introgression of<br />
rufipogon characters into aus might have given rise to am<strong>an</strong> ecotype.<br />
Based on the views of Ch<strong>an</strong>g (1985), Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Arraudeau (1986),<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> her own observations, she proposed that migration of hill rices of<br />
mainl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia ("hrmsea") to Indonesia followed by<br />
introgression of rufipogon genes into it, could have given rise to jav<strong>an</strong>ica<br />
types.<br />
Biswal (1988) assumed that early m<strong>an</strong> worked on different<br />
populations of O. nivara at different sites in southeast India, southwest<br />
China <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia for domestication of rice. In other words, plural<br />
sites of domestication from different populations of O. nivara is more<br />
probable as suggested by Harl<strong>an</strong> (1975) in his h)rpothesis of diffused<br />
origin of agriculture.<br />
Second (1982) <strong>an</strong>alyzed 40-isoenzyme loci of 468 collections of O.<br />
sativa obtained from m<strong>an</strong>y countries. On the basis of their pollen<br />
sterility, he could identify two small groups of varieties, which he called<br />
"<strong>an</strong>cestral" japónica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> "<strong>an</strong>cestral" indica. Assuming the electromorphs<br />
of these two "<strong>an</strong>cestral" groups to be "parental", he presumed that the<br />
electromorphs of other varieties could be hybrid polymorphs. The<br />
electromorphic diversity of the wild rices is greater th<strong>an</strong> that of the<br />
cultivated rice (Shahi et ah, 1969; Pai et aL, 1973, 1975; Second <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Trouslot, 1980). He concluded that among the various phylogenetic<br />
relationships of rice varieties put forward in the literature, only the<br />
hypothesis of the independent domestication of indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica types<br />
proposed by Chou (1948) fits the observed pattern of isozyme variation.<br />
He further concluded that the pollen sterility between the indica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
japónica subspecies could have existed before domestication.<br />
Tripathy (1994) made m<strong>an</strong>y "seihr" x "seihr" crosses <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> observed<br />
that their F^ hybrids show a wide r<strong>an</strong>ge of pollen sterility, as observed
358 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
by Biswal (1988) in nivara x nivara hybrids. Similarly^ the "seihr" x<br />
japónica Fj hybrids showed maximum pollen sterility (14-94%) among<br />
the various interecotypic combinations <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in this sense behaved similar<br />
to nivara x japónica hybrids of Biswal (1988) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> japónica x indica<br />
hybrids reported by others (see Oka, 1964; Sampath, 1964; Shastry, 1964<br />
for review). It was therefore evident that the southeast Indi<strong>an</strong> hill rice<br />
("seihr") behaved like O. nivara in its intraecotypic as well as<br />
interecotypic hybrids. She, thus concluded that these southeast Indi<strong>an</strong><br />
hill rices of Jeypore tract <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its adjacent areas might have directly<br />
originated from 0. nivara.<br />
Tripathy (1994) crossed "seihr", japónica, am<strong>an</strong>, shall <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tjereh<br />
cultivars in all inter-ecotypic combinations. Based on the morphology<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> pollen sterility of their Fj hybrids, it was observed; that (a) the<br />
characters of japónica ecotype showed domin<strong>an</strong>ce in all its interecotypic<br />
hybrid combinations (except in am<strong>an</strong> x japónica) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> (b) the characters<br />
of "seihr" showed domin<strong>an</strong>ce over those of all the other ecot3rpes in all<br />
its inter-ecotypic combinations (except "seihr" x japónica). It was,<br />
concluded that the japónica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> "seihr" have retained more domin<strong>an</strong>t<br />
genes th<strong>an</strong> the other ecotypes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> probably represent two primary<br />
ecotypes from which the other ecotypes have evolved. Within these two<br />
basic ecotypes, the characters of japónica showed domin<strong>an</strong>ce over that<br />
of "seihr" <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hence the former may represent a more primitive ecotype<br />
th<strong>an</strong> the latter.<br />
The shall ecotype of the Brahmaputra valley is similar to the am<strong>an</strong><br />
ecotype with regard to its ecological (<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> agronomic) preferences <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
photosensitivity. The shall types show medium fertility with japónica<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> very low fertility with am<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> tjereh types. The sterility of am<strong>an</strong> x<br />
shall <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> shall x tjereh hybrids vis-a-vis better fertility of shall x japónica<br />
hybrids indicate that the japónica-like forms available in the sub-<br />
Himalay<strong>an</strong> belt of the Brahmaputra valley might have played a role in the<br />
origin of this ecotype (Tripathy, 1994). The pollen fertility of am<strong>an</strong> x<br />
tjereh hybrids was the highest among all the interecotypic hybrids of<br />
tjereh. This indicates that the genetic origin of both these ecotypes could<br />
be the same (Tripathy, 1994).<br />
PROPOSED HYPOTHESIS<br />
O. nivara occurs frequently <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> abund<strong>an</strong>tly in the northeastern part of<br />
the Decc<strong>an</strong> peninsula (which also includes the Jeypore tract of Orissa)<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in the central G<strong>an</strong>getic plains. Its occurrence in western India is<br />
neither so frequent nor so abund<strong>an</strong>t. It is sparsely distributed in southern<br />
India <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is conspicuously absent in G<strong>an</strong>getic Bengal as well as in the<br />
whole of northeastern India. O, nivara is available again in the plateau
S.D. Sharma et al. 359<br />
regions of My<strong>an</strong>mar, Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, Cambodia, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Laos <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in the<br />
southwestern parts of mainl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> China. The geographic distribution of<br />
O. nivara, is thus disjunct; one found in India <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the other in Indochina<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> China.<br />
The small ditches <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> seasonal pools in the plateau regions of South<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> southwestern China provide ideal habitats for<br />
O. nivara. Its distribution in these regions must have been more frequent<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> abund<strong>an</strong>t when hum<strong>an</strong> population was very limited ¿nd hence<br />
cultivated fields were fewer. The hilly tracts were ideal areas for<br />
habitation by Neolithic hunting-gathering m<strong>an</strong> who domesticated m<strong>an</strong>y<br />
pl<strong>an</strong>ts including rice. Morishima (1984) rightly points out that "the deltas<br />
of big rivers were not accessible for early people. Apparently, the hilly<br />
area seems to have played <strong>an</strong> import<strong>an</strong>t role in making contact with rice".<br />
It is therefore highly probable that the people of the northeastern Decc<strong>an</strong><br />
plateau domesticated the "seihr" types <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the people of southwestern<br />
China japonica-like types from populations of O. nivara of their<br />
respective regions.<br />
Origin of Basic Types<br />
M<strong>an</strong>y tribes belonging to Proto-Australoid ethnic stock inhabit the<br />
Jeypore tract of Orissa, India. These people have been "harvesting" O.<br />
nivara, which occurs naturally <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> frequently in seasonal ditches, for<br />
ages. They also practice shifting cultivation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> grow m<strong>an</strong>y primitive<br />
cultivars of rice. With increase in population <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> dwindling forest<br />
cover, however, they are giving up shifting cultivation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> adapting<br />
upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice cultivation but continue to patronize their age-old rice<br />
cultivars. Ramiah (1953) was impressed with the varietal diversity of<br />
this area <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> proposed that it probably represented <strong>an</strong>other independent<br />
center of origin of cultivated rice. During 1955-60, the Central <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research Institute, Cuttack collected more th<strong>an</strong> 1,700 traditional<br />
cultivars of rice from this area. 'Oka <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g (1962) studied these<br />
cultivars of the Jeypore tract of Orissa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> regarded them as forms<br />
intermediate between cultivated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> wild types "still staying in the<br />
midst of differentiation".<br />
The primitive upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice cultivars of the Jeypore tract have m<strong>an</strong>y<br />
special features such as short height, thin culm, few tillers, small<br />
p<strong>an</strong>icles, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> often (though not always) black husk, red kernel, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> awn.<br />
They are short-duration, photoperiod-insensitive cultivars. In fact,<br />
similar types of rice cultivars are often cultivated as a rainfed upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
crop especially in unbunded fields in Chhattisgarh, western Orissa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
southern Bihar (Jharkh<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>) by resource poor farmers. These l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> races<br />
(locally known as tikradh<strong>an</strong>, bhatadh<strong>an</strong>, garodh<strong>an</strong>, etc.) have been<br />
collectively referred to as "southeast Indi<strong>an</strong> hill rices" or by their
360 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
acronym "seihr" in this paper. As already, discussed these ^'seihr" types<br />
have retained m<strong>an</strong>y primitive features, express domin<strong>an</strong>ce for m<strong>an</strong>y of<br />
their characters in their hybrids with other ecotypes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, with regard<br />
to sterility of these hybrids, behave like O. nivara. The ''seihr" types may,<br />
thus, be assumed to have originated directly from O. nivara of southeast<br />
India.<br />
According to Sharma ef al. (1971), Hakim <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sharma (1974),<br />
Asth<strong>an</strong>a <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Majumdar (1981) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sharma (1982), there are various<br />
grades of japonica-like cultivars that are cultivated by the tribal people of<br />
northeast India particularly of Arunachal Pradesh. The higher in altitude<br />
one moves up in the Himalayas, the greater one finds the expression of<br />
japónica traits in its rice cultivars. The l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>races in Taw<strong>an</strong>g district of<br />
Arunachal Pradesh (India) probably present a unique example of<br />
japonica-like rice cultivars that are grown at lower latitude (27"N) but<br />
high altitude (1,800 m). The situation in south <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> southwest China is in<br />
no way different. One c<strong>an</strong> find in the hills of Yunn<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kweichow<br />
provinces (China), where the sinica ("keng") rices were grown at<br />
elevations above 1,800 m, "a mixture of sinica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> indica rices growing<br />
at medium elevations <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> exclusively indica ("hsien") rices at altitudes<br />
below 1000 m" (Ting, 1961 quoted by Ch<strong>an</strong>g, 1985). The japonica-like<br />
types which were domesticated in southwest China spread westward<br />
along the sub-Himalay<strong>an</strong> belt up to Nepal (or even beyond) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
southward up to My<strong>an</strong>mar <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Indo-China. According to Watabe et ah<br />
(1970) these jap'onlca-like types had a much more southerly distribution<br />
in Indochina in the first millennium A.D. Within the area of distribution<br />
of japonica-like types, O. nivara occurs frequently in southwest China<br />
(Shao et al, 1986). It is therefore highly probable that the japonica-like<br />
cultivars were domesticated in southwest China.<br />
The hill rices of mainl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia ("hrmsea") as described by<br />
Ch<strong>an</strong>g (1986) are morphologically similar to bulu <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> gundil types of<br />
Indonesia though the Indonesi<strong>an</strong> types are late in maturity, have a long<br />
vegetative phase, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are adapted to irrigated agriculture. Genetically,<br />
the japónica <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> jav<strong>an</strong>ica are closer to each other <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> produce fairly<br />
fertile hybrids when intercrossed (Terao <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mizushima, 1944; Oka,<br />
1958). Based on isoenzyme studies, Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n (1985) put the japónica,<br />
"hrrnsea", <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the jav<strong>an</strong>ica in the same cluster. According to Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Arraudeau (1986), the morphological characters of the rice cultivars<br />
of Jap<strong>an</strong>, Korea, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> northern China <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> that of Indonesia form two<br />
extremes of the same geographical dine <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the cultivars of the mont<strong>an</strong>e<br />
areas of Southeast Asia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Himalayas occupy <strong>an</strong> intermediate<br />
position. It is therefore probable that the hill rices of mainl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast<br />
Asia (''hrmsea") have originated from O, nivara of that region. If so, the<br />
hill regions of the mainl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia represent <strong>an</strong>other center (or a
S.D. Sharma et a l 361<br />
subcenter?) of geyietic diversity of 0 . nivara as well as of origin of<br />
cultivated rice, particularly of the "hrmsea" types which seem to be the<br />
progenitors of the jav<strong>an</strong>ica ecotype. If O. nivara of southern China <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Southeast Asia are assumed to be genetically closer to each other when<br />
compared with that of Southeast Asia, the closer relationship among the<br />
japónica, “hrmsea", <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> jav<strong>an</strong>ica c<strong>an</strong> be easily explained.<br />
As already discussed, the populations of O, nivara are often<br />
genetically differentiated (Biswal, 1988). This differentiation increases<br />
with increase in spatial separation of their populations <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is expressed<br />
as sterility of their hybrids. The genetic differentiation that existed in<br />
the original populations of O. nivara of southeast India <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> southwest<br />
China has been carried over to the domesticated rice (O. sativa) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is<br />
reflected as sterility in their interecotypic hybrids of O, sativa, e.g. in<br />
japónica x índica hybrids. The "seihr" tjpes of southeast India, the<br />
japonica“like types of southwest China <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the "hrmsea" types of central<br />
Indochina may, thus be assumed to represent three basic stocks of O.<br />
sativa that have evolved directly from the <strong>an</strong>nual wild species (O. nivara)<br />
of their respective regions in Asia.<br />
Origin of Primary Ecotypes<br />
The photoperiod-insensitive rice cultivars that are grown in bunded<br />
fields during the monsoon (July-October) season <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mature in 100 to<br />
120 days are collectively known as aus types in Bengal. In fact, cultivars<br />
similar to aus are widely cultivated in the whole of southeastern,<br />
northeastern <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> eastern India although they are called by different<br />
names in different states. Ecogenetically, they are one <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the same<br />
group that has been termed as aus in rice literature. The aus cultivars are<br />
genetically superior to "seihr" types in their yield attributes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> respond<br />
better to agronomic practices. The aus ecotype seems to have evolved<br />
directly from the upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice ("seihr") of southeast India. Traditionally,<br />
aus were grown only under rainfed conditions as the whole of eastern<br />
India used to receive sufficient rain. Subsequently, its cultivation spread<br />
from southeast India to other parts of India,<br />
The japonica-like types were carried from southwestern China to<br />
eastern <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> then to northern China, where they developed into what is<br />
now known as keng types. These keng types had better yield attributes,<br />
were better amenable to agronomic m<strong>an</strong>ipulations, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> suited to irrigated<br />
conditions.<br />
m<br />
Origin of Secondary Ecotypes<br />
The migration of early m<strong>an</strong> from upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s toward lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s of river<br />
deltas must have been a later event in the history of rice cultivation
p<br />
362 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
(Whyte^ 1972; Morishima, 1984). If so, the primitive cultiváis of rice<br />
evolved from O. nivara were carried by m<strong>an</strong> to new habitats closer to<br />
that of 0 . rufipogon resulting in the introgression of rufipogon genes into<br />
sativa cultiváis.<br />
The am<strong>an</strong> types of rice cultiváis could be the result of introgression<br />
of rufipogon genes into sativa cultiváis. The am<strong>an</strong> types are photoperiod<br />
sensitive, late maturing, adapted to wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rice cultivation, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> more<br />
productive th<strong>an</strong> aus types. The lower G<strong>an</strong>getic valley was probably the<br />
meeting ground, where genes of O. rufipogon got introgressed into aus<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> as a result, am<strong>an</strong> types were developed. Endowed with the new<br />
traits, the rice pl<strong>an</strong>t was capable of spreading over to wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, <strong>an</strong><br />
ecosystem hardly ever exploited by <strong>an</strong>y crop pl<strong>an</strong>t.<br />
The shall types, though morphologically as well as ecologically<br />
exhibiting m<strong>an</strong>y similarities with the am<strong>an</strong> types, do show affinity with<br />
the japónica types for some characters such as grain type, number of<br />
priinary br<strong>an</strong>ches per p<strong>an</strong>icle, toler<strong>an</strong>ce to cold, etc. In the interecotypic<br />
hybrids reported here, the characters of japónica expressed domin<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
over that of "seihr" <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the characters of shall over that of am<strong>an</strong>. In<br />
japónica x shall hybrids also the characters of japónica were domin<strong>an</strong>t.<br />
With regard to pollen fertility of interecotypic hybrids, the shali types<br />
showed greater fertility with japónica (60.73%) th<strong>an</strong> with am<strong>an</strong> (51.09%).<br />
It is therefore interpreted that shali types are the products of introgression<br />
of rufipogon characters into japonica-like forms of that region. In this<br />
context, it is noteworthy that O, rufipogon <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> shali cultiváis of O. sativa<br />
are sympatric in the Brahmaputra valley <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hence the introgression of<br />
rufipogon genes into the background of japonica-Uke cultiváis is highly<br />
probable.<br />
The migration of hill rices of mainl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia ('^hrmsea"<br />
from that region to Indonesia with introgression of some genes of O.<br />
rufipogon ?) could be the only plausible expl<strong>an</strong>ation for the physiological<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ecological adaptation of jav<strong>an</strong>ica types to irrigated as well as the high<br />
fertility observed in jav<strong>an</strong>ica x nivara hybrids by Biswal (1988).<br />
According to Watabe, the Indi<strong>an</strong>s carried am<strong>an</strong> types to Indochina<br />
sometime in the 9th century AD. The tjereh types of Indonesia could<br />
have developed from the am<strong>an</strong> types of India carried to Indonesia by the<br />
Indi<strong>an</strong>s during this period. This may explain the high pollen fertility of<br />
am<strong>an</strong> x tjereh hybrids reported by Morinaga (1968) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Tripathy (1994).<br />
The primary ecot)^es of O. sativa have retained the photoinsensitivity<br />
of the <strong>an</strong>nual wild species (O. nivara) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> m<strong>an</strong> has<br />
successfully exploited this trait to develop genotypes suitable for<br />
cultivation of rice in different seasons of the year. The secondary ecot)rpes<br />
have acquired photoperiod sensitivity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> adaptation to lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
even greater depths of water. M<strong>an</strong> has successfully exploited these
L i -<br />
S.D. Sharma et al. 363<br />
secondary traits of the rice pl<strong>an</strong>t to spread its cultivation to new<br />
ecosystems.<br />
SUPPORTING EVIDENCE<br />
Our hypothesis that the Asi<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice (O. sativa) had not only a<br />
polyphyletic origin (two species of Oryza have played key roles in its<br />
origin)^ but also a polytopic origin (rice originated independently at<br />
plural sites), does not contradict the findings of other disciplines.<br />
Archeological excavations indicate the presence of rice in the food<br />
economy of early m<strong>an</strong> as far back as 5000 BC in China as well as in India.<br />
This suggests that rice might have been simult<strong>an</strong>eously domesticated at<br />
m<strong>an</strong>y sites. Anthropologically, the whole area starting from the western<br />
coast of India to the eastern coast of southern China <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vietnam was<br />
inhabited during this period by Pro to-Australoids, i.e., by people<br />
speaking the Austric group of l<strong>an</strong>guages. Pro to-Australoids practiced<br />
primitive methods of rice cultivation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> must have been responsible<br />
for the origin of "seihr types in southeast India, japonica-like types in<br />
Southwestern China <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> "hrmsea" types in Southeast Asia. However,<br />
rice seemed to have played only a marginal role in their food economy<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> was not a staple diet (Whyte, 1972; Kumar, 1988).<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> could have become a staple diet only after development of the<br />
am<strong>an</strong> ecotype, which was adapted to a lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ecosystem <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> had<br />
greater productivity. For large-scale cultivation of this ecotype, iron<br />
implements (for plowing the l<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> draft <strong>an</strong>imals (oxen in India,<br />
water buffaloes in China) must have been prerequisites. This could have<br />
been possible only after the movement of Ary<strong>an</strong>s into the lower G<strong>an</strong>getic<br />
valley <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Chinese civilization to southern China. Development of<br />
am<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> shall types in the valleys of the G<strong>an</strong>ga <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Brahmaputra<br />
respectively, must thus have been quite late in the history of<br />
domestication of rice. The am<strong>an</strong> rices were carried to Indonesia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Indochina by the Indi<strong>an</strong> coloiuzers around the 9th century AD. The tjereh<br />
types of Indonesia are probably modified forms of am<strong>an</strong> rices carried<br />
from India to Indonesia.<br />
Watabe <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> his associates ( Watabe <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Akihama, 1968; Watabe,<br />
1970,1973; Akihama <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Watabe, 1970; Watabe, ei'ah, 1970; Watabe <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Toshimitsu, 1974; Watabe, et ah, 1976) have extensively surveyed the<br />
rice grains found in the <strong>an</strong>cient bricks at historical sites of India,<br />
My<strong>an</strong>mar, Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, Laos, Cambodia <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Vietnam. Summarizing their<br />
findings, Watabe et al., (1976) noted that in Indochina there were two<br />
routes of dispersal of cultivated rice in early times, one followed the<br />
Mekong River from Laos to the South, The strains of rice tr<strong>an</strong>smitted
364 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
along this route showed the characteristic features of the japónica or<br />
japonica-Uke grain type. This type of rice was considered to have been<br />
first cultivated in Indochina. The second route was from India over the<br />
Bay of Bengal to the coastal areas of Indochina. The grain type<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>smitted by this route was clearly of the indica or am<strong>an</strong> type. This<br />
group was tr<strong>an</strong>smitted to Indochina at a later date th<strong>an</strong> the japónica or<br />
japonica-like group. The author named the former group ''the Mekong<br />
descent group" <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the latter group "the Bengal descent group".<br />
The development of three basic ecotypes of O. sativa from three<br />
different populations of O. nivara in three different regions is not only<br />
associated with their genetic differentiation; but also with their ecological<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> physiological differentiation. Tsunoda (1984) inferred the japónica to<br />
be<strong>an</strong> ecospecies, established in the sub-tropical hardleaf evergreen forest<br />
region grown under a watered condition to avoid the cold, the jav<strong>an</strong>ica<br />
established in the tropical rain forest region primarily under rainfed<br />
upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> conditions benefiting from the warm climate <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the rainfall<br />
throughout the year^ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the indica <strong>an</strong> ecospecies established in the<br />
monsoon moist deciduous forest region grown under high temperatures<br />
to summer monsoon rains on the upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> monsoon rains <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> flood<br />
waters in lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s forming ecotypes such as early aus <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> late am<strong>an</strong>.<br />
References<br />
Akihama, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Watabe^ T. 1970. Geographical distribution <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> ecotypic differentiation of<br />
wild rice in Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>. T o n a n A j i a K e n k y u ( T h e S o u th e a s t A s i a n S t u d i e s ) B ( 3 ) : 337-346.<br />
Andrews, F,W, 1956. The flowering pl<strong>an</strong>ts of the Sud<strong>an</strong>. Vol. III. T. Bunde & Co. Ltd.,<br />
Arbroath, Scotl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>.<br />
Asth<strong>an</strong>a, A. N. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Majumdar, N. D. 1981. Studies in the rice germplasm of northeastern hill<br />
region. Res. B u l l N o . II, ICAR Complex for NEH Region, Shillong.<br />
Biswal, J. 1988. Genetic differentiation in O r y z a n i v a r a . Unpubli. Ph.D. thesis, Utkal<br />
University, Bhub<strong>an</strong>eswar, Orissa (India).<br />
Bor, N.L. 1960. T h e G r a s s e s o f B u r m a , C e y l o n , I n d i a a n d P a k i s t a n (excluding Bambuseae).<br />
Pergamon Press, Oxford.<br />
Ch<strong>an</strong>g, T. T. 1976. The origin, evolution, cultivation, dissemination <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> diversification of<br />
Asi<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Afric<strong>an</strong> rices. E u p h y t i c a 2 5 :425-441.<br />
Ch<strong>an</strong>g, T. T. 1985. Crop history <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> genetic conservation : <strong>Rice</strong>— case study. I o w a S t a te } .<br />
Res. 59(4) : 4 2 5 -A 5 6 .<br />
Ch<strong>an</strong>g, T.T. ei a l., 1986. Genetic studies on the components of drought resist<strong>an</strong>ce in rice<br />
{ O r y z a s a t iv a L.). In: <strong>Rice</strong> G e n e t ic s . IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp. 387-398.<br />
Chatterjee, D. 1948. A modified key <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> enumeration of the species of O r y z a l A i m . I n d i a n /.<br />
A g r i c , S e i. 18 :185-192.<br />
Chatterjee, D. 1951. Note on the origin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> distribution of wild <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cultivated rices. I n d i a n J.<br />
G e n e t . P I . a n d B r e e d . 2:18-22,<br />
Chevalier, A. 1932. Nouvelle contribution A l'étude systématique des O r y z a . R e v . B o t . A p p l<br />
d ' A g r i c . T r o p . 12 :1014-1032.
S.D. Sharma e t a l , 365<br />
Chou, C.L. 1948. China is the place of origin of rice. /■R i c e S o c . C h i n a 7 : 53-54 (in Chinese).<br />
Clayton, W. D. 1968. Studies in the Gramineae. XVII. K e w B u l l . 21(3): 485-488.<br />
De C<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>olle 1886. O r i g i n o f C u l t i v a t e d P l a n t s , (fase, ed.). Haiher, New York, 1967.<br />
Dhua, S. R. 1994. Genome <strong>an</strong>alysis of O r y z a r h iz o m a t i s Vaughn. Ph.D. thesis, Visva Bharati,<br />
Sriniket<strong>an</strong> (India).<br />
Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n, J.C, 1985. A new insight into Asi<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice classification from isozyme<br />
studies. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Neioslett. 2:48-51<br />
Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n, J. C. 1986. A varietal classification of Asi<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice {Oryza sativa L.)<br />
based on isozyme polymorphism. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines, pp, 83-90.<br />
Glaszm<strong>an</strong>n, J.C. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Arraudeau, M. 1986. Varietal diversity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reproductive barriers, I,<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>t type variation, ;aponiCß-/flWtticß relationships. <strong>Rice</strong>G<strong>an</strong>et. Newsktt. 3 :41-43.<br />
Hakim, K. L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sharma, S. D. 1974. Localised distribution of certain characters of rice<br />
cultivars in northeast India, Proc. 2nd Gen. Congr., SABRAO. Indi<strong>an</strong> }. Genet. 34A: 16-21<br />
Hamada, H. 1949. Über den Ursprung des Reisbaues in Asien ( in Jap<strong>an</strong>ese with Germ<strong>an</strong><br />
Summary) P r o c . C r o p S e i. S o c . j a p a n . 18:106-107.<br />
Henderson, M. T. 1964. Cytogenetic studies at the Lousi<strong>an</strong>a Agricultural Experiment Station<br />
of species relationships in O r y z a . In: R ic e G e n e t ic s a n d C y t o g e n e t ic s . Elsevier, A m s t e r d a m ,<br />
pp 103-110.<br />
Harl<strong>an</strong>, J. R. 1975, C r o p s a n d M a n . S o c i e t y o f A g r o n o m y , Madison, Wisconsin.<br />
Hooker, J.D. 1897. F l o r a o f B r i t i s h I n d i a , Vol. VIII. Reeve & Co, Ltd., London.<br />
IRRI, 1964a. Report of the Committee appointed to attempt a st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard classification <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
nomenclature of the genus O r y z a . In: R i c e G e n e t ic a n d C y t o g e n e t ic s . Elsevier, Amsterdam,<br />
pp. 251-252.<br />
IRRI, 1964b. Recommendation of the Committee on Genome Symbols for O r y z a Species. In:<br />
R i c e G e n e t ic s a n d C y t o g e n e t ic s . Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 253-254.<br />
Kumar, T. T, 1988, H i s t o r y o f R i c e i n In d i a ; M y t h o l o g y , C u l t u r e a n d A g r i c u l t u r e . Gi<strong>an</strong> Publ.<br />
House, Delhi.<br />
Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Pl<strong>an</strong>tarum, vol. I. Holmaiae, Laurentii, Salivi.<br />
Morinaga, T. 1968. Origin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> geographical distribution of Jap<strong>an</strong>ese rice. J a p . A g r i e . R e s ,<br />
Qtrly. 3 : 1-524.<br />
Morishima, H. 1984. Wild pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> domestication. In: B i o l o g y o f R i c e . S . Tsunoda <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> N.<br />
Takahashi (eds,). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 3-30.<br />
Oka, H. 1,1958, Intervarietal variation <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> classification of cultivated rice. I n d i a n J . G e n e t 18<br />
: 79-89.<br />
Oka, H. 1 .1964. Pattern of interspecific relationships <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> evolutionary dynamics in O r y z a .<br />
s a tiv a L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> five wild diploid forms o í O r y z a . C r o p S e t. 1:445-450.<br />
Oka, H. 1.1974. Experimental studies on the origin of cultivated rice. G e n e t ic s 78:475-486.<br />
Oka, H, 1.1988. O r i g i n o f C u l t i v a t e d R ic e . Elsevier, Amsterdam.Jap. Sei. Soc., Tokyo.<br />
Oka, H. I. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g, W. T. 1959. The impact of cultivation on populations of wild rice,<br />
O r y z a s a t iv a f. s p o n ta n e a . P h y t o n . , 13:115-117.<br />
Oka, H. I. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g, W. T, 1962. <strong>Rice</strong> varieties intermediate between wild <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cultivated<br />
forms <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the origin of t h e ja p ó n i c a ty p e . B o t . B u l l . A c a d . S ín ic a 3 : 109-131.<br />
Pai, C., Endo T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Oka, H. 1.1973. Genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis for peroxidase isozymes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> their org<strong>an</strong><br />
specificity in O r y z a p e r e n n i s <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. s a t iv a . C a n . /. G e n e t C y t o t . 15:845-853.<br />
Pai, C., Endo, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Oka, H. 1.1975. Genetic <strong>an</strong>alysis for acid phosphatase isozymes in O.<br />
p e r e n n is a n d O , s a t iv a . C a n . J . G e n e t a n d C y t o l . 1 7 :637-650.<br />
Porteres, R. 1956. Taxonomie agrobot<strong>an</strong>ique des riz cultives O r y z a . 0. s a tiv a L. et O .<br />
g la b e r r im a S t e u d . J . A g r . T r a p . B o t . A p p l . 3:341-384,541-580,627-700,821-856.<br />
Prain, D. 1903. B e n g a l P l a n t s , Vol.IL N.W. & Co., Calcutta.
366 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Ram<strong>an</strong>ujam, S. 1938. Cytogenetic studies in the Oiyzeae, III. Cytogenetical behaviour of <strong>an</strong><br />
interspecific hybrid in Oryza. J. Genet. 35 :223-258.<br />
Ramiah, K. 1953. <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics. Sci. Monog. No.l9, Indi<strong>an</strong> Council Agrie. Res.,<br />
New Delhi.<br />
Ramiah, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chose, R. L .M. 1951. Origin <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> distribution of cultivated pl<strong>an</strong>ts of south<br />
Asia ; <strong>Rice</strong>. Indi<strong>an</strong> J. Genet. 11 ; 7-13.<br />
Richharia, R. H. 1960. Origin of cultivated rices. Indi<strong>an</strong> J. Genet. 20:1-14.<br />
Roschevicz, R. J. 1931. A contribution to the knowledge of rice. Appl. Bot. Genet. PI. Breed.<br />
Bull. 27:2-133 {in Russi<strong>an</strong> with English summary).<br />
Roxburgh, 1832. Flora Indica, Vol.II, 200<br />
Sampath, S. 1962. The genus Oryza ; its taxonomy <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> species inter-relationships. Oryza 1:1-<br />
29.<br />
Sampath, S. 1964a. The signific<strong>an</strong>ce of hybrid sterility in rice. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Cyto<strong>genetics</strong>. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 175-186.<br />
Sampath, S. 1964b. The species <strong>an</strong>cestral to cultivated rice. Curr. Sci. 33(7) : 205-207.<br />
Sampath, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Rao. M. B.V. N. 1951. Inter-relationship between species in the genus Oryza.<br />
Indi<strong>an</strong> J. Genet. 11:14-17.<br />
Sampath, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Govindaswami, S. 1958. Wild rices of Orissa, their relationship to cultivated<br />
rices. <strong>Rice</strong> News Teller. 6 : 17-20.<br />
Second, G. 1982. Origin of the genic diversity of cultivated rice (Oryza spp.): Study of the<br />
polymorphism stored at 40 isozyme loci. }pn. /. Genet. 57:25-57.<br />
Second, G. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Trouslot, P. 1980. Polymorphisme de trieze zymogrammes observes parmi<br />
diverses especes sauvages et cultivées du genre Oryza. In: Electrophorèse d'enzymes de riz<br />
(Oryza spp.). Travaux et documents 120: 50-58, ORSTOM, Paris.<br />
Senara tna, J. E. 1956. The Grasses of Ceylon. Govt. Press, Colombo.<br />
Shahi, B.B., Morishima, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Oka, H.I. 1969. A survey of variations in peroxidase acid<br />
phosphatase <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> esterase isozymes of wild <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cultivated Oryza species. Jpn. J. Genet.<br />
44 :303^19.<br />
Shao, Q., Yi, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Chen, Z. 1986. New finding concerning the origin of rice. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics.<br />
IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, pp. 53-58.<br />
Sharma, S. D. 1964. Interspecific Relationship in Genus Oryza. Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, Indi<strong>an</strong><br />
Agrie, Res. Inst, New Delhi.<br />
Sharma, S, D. 1982. Collection <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> evaluation of rice germplasm from northeast India.<br />
IBPGR Pl<strong>an</strong>t Genet, Resources Newslett. 50 ; 62-69.<br />
Sharma, S. D. 1986. Evolutionary trends in genus Oryza. In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila,<br />
Philippines., pp. 59-67.<br />
Sharma, S. D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry, S. V. S. 1965a. Taxonomic studies in genus Oryza, I. Asiatic types<br />
of O, sativa complex. Indi<strong>an</strong> }. Genet. 25 : 145-156.<br />
Sharma, S.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry, S.V.S. 1965b. Taxonomic studies in genus Oryza, II. O. rufipogon<br />
Griff, sensu stricto <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. nivara Sharma et Shastry nom. nov. Indi<strong>an</strong> }. Genet, 25:157-165.<br />
Sharma, S. D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry, S.V.S. 1966a. Taxonomic studies in genus Oryza, III. Some<br />
nomenclatural confusions. BmÍ/. Bot. Surv. India 6:211-218.<br />
Sharma, S. D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry, S.V.S. 1966b. Taxonomic studies in genus Oryza, V. Sderophyllum<br />
coarctatum (Roxb.) Griff, Bull. Bot Surv. India 8:42-44.<br />
Sharma S. D., Vell<strong>an</strong>ki, J.M.R., Hakim,, K.L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Singh, R.K. 1971. Primitive <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> current<br />
cultivars-of rice in Assam—a rich source of valuable genes. Cwrr, Sci. 40:126-128.<br />
Shastry, S.V.S. 1964. Is sterility genic in japonica-indica rice hybrids In: <strong>Rice</strong> Genetics <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Cyio^enefics. Eisevier Amsterdam, pp. 154-157.
S.D. Sharma et ah 367<br />
Shastry^ S. V. S; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sharma, S. D. 1973. In; Evolutionary Studies in World Crops: Diversity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Ch<strong>an</strong>ge in the Indi<strong>an</strong> Sw^conimeni. J. Hutchinson (ed.). Cambridge Univ. Pres, London, pp.<br />
55-63.<br />
Shastry, S.V.S., Sharma, S.D. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> R<strong>an</strong>ga Rao, D. R. 1961. Pachytene <strong>an</strong>alysis of Oryza, III.<br />
Meiosis in <strong>an</strong> intersectional hybrid. Nucleus 4 : 67-80,<br />
Takahashi, N. 1984. Differentiation of ecotypes inOryzfl sativa L. In: Biology of <strong>Rice</strong> S. Tsunoda<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> N. Takahashi (eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 31-67.<br />
Tateoka, T. 1962. Taxonomic studies of Oryza, II. Several species complexes. Bpt. Mag, 75 :<br />
455-461.<br />
Tateoka, T. 1965. Porteresia, a new genus of Gramineae. Bull Natl. Sei. Mus. (Toicyo) 8: 405-<br />
406.<br />
Terao, H. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Mizushima, U. 1944. On the affinity of rice varieties cultivated in east Asia<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> America. Bull Agric. Expt. Sta., Ministry of -Agric. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Commerce (Jap<strong>an</strong>) 55:1-7 (in<br />
Jap<strong>an</strong>ese).<br />
Ting, Y.(ed.). 1961. Cftinese Culture of Lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> (in Chinese). Agric. Publ. Soc., Beijing.<br />
Tripathy, S. 1994, Ecogenetic Differentiation in Oryza sativa L. Unpubl. Ph. D. thesis, Utkal<br />
Univ,, Bhub<strong>an</strong>eswar, Orissa (India).<br />
Tsunoda, S. 1984, Synthesis <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> perspectives. In: Biology of <strong>Rice</strong>. S. Tsunoda <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> N. Takahashi<br />
(eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 361-375.<br />
Vaugh<strong>an</strong>, D. A. 1994, The Wild Relatives of <strong>Rice</strong>. IRRI, M<strong>an</strong>ila, Philippines.<br />
Watabe, T. 1970. The alteration of cultivated rice in Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cambodia. Tofiim Ajia<br />
Kenkyu (The Southeast Asi<strong>an</strong> Studies) 8 :36-45.<br />
Watabe, T. 1973. Alternation of cultivated rice in Indochina. Jap. Agric. Res, Qtrly, 7(3): 160-<br />
163.<br />
Watabe, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Akihama, T. 1968. Morphology of rice grains recovered from ruins in<br />
Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>. Ton<strong>an</strong> Ajia Kenkyu (The Southeast Asi<strong>an</strong> Studies) 6(2): 331-334.<br />
Watabe, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Toshimitsu, K. 1974. Morphological properties of old rice grains recovered<br />
from ruins in Indi<strong>an</strong> sub-continent, A study on the alterations of cultivated rice.<br />
Preliminary Report of Tottori University's Scientific Survey, Voi. 2, pp. 1-18.<br />
Watabe, T., Akihama, T. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Kinoshita, 0 . 1970. The alteration of cultivated rice in Thail<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Cambodia. Ton<strong>an</strong> Ajia Kenkyu {The Southeast Asi<strong>an</strong> Studies) 8(1): 36-45<br />
Watabe, T., T<strong>an</strong>aka, K. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Nyunt, K, 1976. Ancient rice grains recovered from ruins in<br />
Burma. A study on the alteration of cultivated rice. Preliminary Report of the Kyoto<br />
University Scientific Survey to Burma, pp. 1-18.<br />
Watt, G. 1891. Dictionary of the Economic Products of India, Vol. 5, pp. 498-654.<br />
Whyte, R .0 .1972. The Gramineae, wild <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> cultivated in monsoonal <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> equatorial Asia, I.<br />
Southeast Asia. Ancient Perspectives V. 15(2): 127-151.<br />
Yeh, B. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Henderson, M. T, 1961. Cytogenetic relationship between cultivated rice, Oryza<br />
sativa L. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> five wild diploid forms of Oryza. Crop. Scl 1; 445-450.<br />
APPENDIX<br />
Nomenclature of Some Oryza Species<br />
1. O. harthii A. Cheval This is the <strong>an</strong>nual wild species of Africa with a<br />
genomic constitution of AA. During the 1950s <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 1960s, this species<br />
Sharma, S.D., Tripathy, S. <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Biswal, J. 1997. Origin of Asi<strong>an</strong> cultivated rice <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> its<br />
ecotypic differentiation. Indi<strong>an</strong> }, Genet. & Pl<strong>an</strong>t Breed. 57(4): 339-360.<br />
The authors disown the paper due to extensive textual, grammatical <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> typographical<br />
distortions made by the editor of the journal.
m<br />
368 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
was known to rice <strong>research</strong>ers by its synonym O. breviligulata A. Cheval.<br />
et Roehr. The binomial O. barthii was wrongly used for the perermial<br />
wild species (0. longistaminata) by almost all biosystematists until<br />
Clayton (1968) clarified the situation.<br />
2. O. glaberrima Steud. The Afric<strong>an</strong> cultivated species of rice. Its<br />
cultivation has remained confined to tropical west Africa.<br />
Morphologically, it closely resembles the Asi<strong>an</strong> cultivated species (O.<br />
sativa). The two cultivated species, O, glaberrima <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. sativa, c<strong>an</strong> be<br />
differentiated by a few distinctive characters. The variation available in<br />
the two cultivated species is strikingly parallel. The hybrid between the<br />
two cultivated species is, however, highly sterile. According to Porteres<br />
(1956), p. glaberrima originated from the <strong>an</strong>nual wild species (our O.<br />
breviligulata) in tropical west Africa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is still grown only in that region.<br />
3. O. glumaepetula Steud. The Americ<strong>an</strong> perennial species with a<br />
genomic constitution of AA. It is widely distributed in tropical America<br />
from Cuba to Paraguay. It is also known as O. cuhensis Ekm<strong>an</strong>, a nomen<br />
nudum, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> as O. perennis subsp. cubensis. Some taxonomists (Tateoka,<br />
1962) merge this taxon with the Asi<strong>an</strong> perennial species, O. rufipogon.<br />
The Asi<strong>an</strong> species (O. rufipogon) is a runner, whereas the Americ<strong>an</strong><br />
species (O. glumaepetula) is semierect. Subgenomically, they are different<br />
(Henderson, 1964).<br />
4. O. longistaminata A. Chaval. et Roehr. ThisTs the perennial wild<br />
species of Africa with a genomic constitution of AA. It was wrongly<br />
identified as O. barthii by all rice biosystematists until Clayton (1968)<br />
pointed out the mistake. It was referred to as O. perennis subsp. barthii by<br />
those who treated the perennial > wild species {glumaepetula,<br />
longistaminata, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rufipogon) of America, Africa, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Asia as a single<br />
species.<br />
5. O. minuta J.S. Presl. ex C.B. Presl. This is a tetraploid {2n = 48) wild<br />
species with a genomic constitution of BBCC, Its distribution is restricted<br />
to the Philippines only. Morphologically, it resembles the diploid {In ~<br />
24) species O. officinalis (genomic constitution CC or DD?) which is<br />
widely distributed in South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast Asia. Taxonomists, earlier<br />
unaware of this cytogenetic difference, merged the two species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
called the combined species O: minuta as this binomial has priority over<br />
the binomial O. officinalis.<br />
6. O. nivara Sharma et Shastry. This is the <strong>an</strong>nual wild species of Asia<br />
with a genomic constitution of AA. It is closely related to the Asi<strong>an</strong><br />
cultivated species, O. sativa. It has also been known as O. fatua Koenig<br />
nomen nudum. It was identified as O. sativa v<strong>an</strong> fatua following Prain<br />
(1903) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> as O. sativa var. spont<strong>an</strong>ea following Roschevicz (1931), which<br />
also included their naturally occurring hybrids. Some taxonomists<br />
(Tateoka, 1962) merge this <strong>an</strong>nual species with the perennial wild species
S.D. Sharma et a l 369<br />
O, rufipogon. Senaratna (1956) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Sampath (1962, 1964b) wrongly<br />
identified it as O. rufipogon Griff.<br />
7. O. officinalis Wall, ex Watt. This is a diploid {2n - 24) species with a<br />
genomic constitution of CC. According to Dhua (1994), its genomic<br />
constitution should be DD. It is widely distributed in South <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Southeast<br />
Asia. It grows in partial shade in forests near running streams, moist<br />
grounds, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sometimes in shallow ditches. The hybrid between O.<br />
sativa <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O, officinalis is completely sterile. Morphologically, it closely<br />
resembles the tetraploid species O. latifolia (genome CCDD) of America<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O, minuta (genome BBCC) of the Philippines. It was therefore<br />
misidentified as O. latifolia (Hooker, 1897) or as 0 . minuta (Bor, 1960).<br />
8. O. rufipogon Griff. This is the diploid perennial wild species of Asia<br />
with a genomic constitution of AA. It is closely related to the <strong>an</strong>nual wild<br />
species (G. nivara) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the cultivated species (O. sativa) of Asia. It was<br />
identified as O. perennis Moench by all rice biosysternatists from 1951 to<br />
1962 following Chatter]ee (1948) until Bor (1960), Tateoka (1962), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry (1965b, 1966a) clarified the position. It has also been<br />
referred to as O. perennis subsp. balunga (Sampath <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Govindaswami,<br />
1958) or as O. balunga (Yeh <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Henderson, 1961). According to Tateoka<br />
(1962), O. rufipogon (sensu lato) includes O. nivara <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. glumaepetula.<br />
9. Porteresia coarctata (Roxb.) Tateoka. This is a tetraploid (2u = 48)<br />
species that grows in the tidal swamps of rivers of South Asia. It was<br />
known as Oryza coarctata Roxburgh to all rice <strong>research</strong>ers until Tateoka<br />
(1965) removed it from the genus Oryza <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> erected a new genus,<br />
Porteresia, to accommodate this single species. Sharma <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Shastry<br />
(1966b) have provided additional evidence for its removal from the<br />
genus Oryza. Its genome has not been determined so far.<br />
10. O. eichingeri. This is a small pl<strong>an</strong>t growing in forest shades of<br />
equatorial Africa. It is a diploid (2n = 24, genome = CC) species. Tateoka<br />
collected it in 1964 for the first time in the living form. It also occurs in<br />
Sri L<strong>an</strong>ka. The Sri L<strong>an</strong>k<strong>an</strong> form was earlier known as O. officinalis<br />
(Ceylon) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> was used for genome <strong>an</strong>alysis, established to be CC. This<br />
Sri L<strong>an</strong>k<strong>an</strong> form was later treated as a distinct species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> called O.<br />
collina.<br />
11. O. schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a Prod. This is a tetraploid species with a<br />
genomic constitution BBCC. It is widely distributed in tropical Africa. It<br />
grows in partial shade near running streams or pools of water.<br />
Roschevicz (1931) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Andrew (1956) treat O, schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a Jap<strong>an</strong>ese<br />
authors fallow Tateoka (1962). Earlier, if was misidentified as O.<br />
eichingeri until Tateoka (1962) pointed out the mistake (2n = 48) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O.<br />
punctata (2n = 24) as two species. Tateoka (1962), however, merged the<br />
two species <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> to differentiate designated them as O. punctata {2n = 24)<br />
<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> O. punctata (2n = 48).
Index<br />
Abiotic 1,14,46, 73,263,272,273,306<br />
Abortion 113<br />
Accessions 334,335,336<br />
Acid lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 223, 228<br />
Acid sulfate 219, 221,224,230, 231,235<br />
Acid upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 219,222,223,224,228, 230,<br />
232, 235<br />
Acidity 63<br />
Additive 177,205, 233,253<br />
Additive genetic variation 122<br />
Adventitious roots 86,88<br />
Adverse soil 219<br />
Aerenchyma 85,86,87<br />
Aerobic 222, 226, 231, 274, 331<br />
Aerobic soil 289<br />
Agarose gel electrophoresis 334<br />
Agriculture 55,65<br />
Agrobacteriium-mediated<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sformation 211<br />
Agrochemical 1, 71<br />
Agroecology 57,67<br />
Agroecosystems 73<br />
Agroforestry 65,69<br />
Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) 331<br />
Alien chromosome 307<br />
Alien genes 15,272,274,275,276,277,278,<br />
279,280,282, 283,288<br />
Alien germplasm 273,283<br />
Alien species 234,271<br />
Alkali injury 227<br />
Alkaline soil 223<br />
Alkalinity 221,225,228, 229,230, 231<br />
All India Coordinated <strong>Rice</strong> Improvement<br />
Program (AICRIP) 158,183,207<br />
Allele 30,110,112,113,210, 243, 245,281,<br />
282<br />
Allelic 148,150,176,195, 200<br />
Allelic interaction 109,110, 111, 114<br />
Allelochemical 153<br />
Allelopathy 1<br />
Alley cropping 66<br />
Alloplasmic 31<br />
Allotetraploid 288, 290,335, 338<br />
Allotriploid 306<br />
Alogamous 30<br />
Aluminum toxicity 224,225,226, 228,<br />
230, 232, 233, 235<br />
Am<strong>an</strong> 40, 62, 353, 358, 362, 363, 364<br />
Amphidiploids 306, 322, 323, 340<br />
Amplified fragment length<br />
polymorphisms (AFLPs) 242<br />
Anaerobic 86,228<br />
Aneuhaploids 301<br />
Aneuploid 44,279,293<br />
AngustifoUa 313,314,321,339,340<br />
Annual 316,333,339,341,352<br />
Annual cultivated 351,356<br />
Annual wild 351<br />
Annual wild species 350,351,355,356,<br />
361,362,315<br />
Anther culture 44,45,231,301<br />
Anthesis 77<br />
Anthropologically 363<br />
Antibacterial compound 154<br />
Antibiosis 151,152,203, 205<br />
Antixenosis 152<br />
Apomixis 13,34,44,47<br />
Aquaculture 65<br />
Archeological excavations 363<br />
Aus 40,112,361,362,364<br />
Auto triploid 294<br />
Autogamous 30<br />
Autopolyploid 329<br />
Autosyndetic 329<br />
Autotetraploid 276,279,293,306<br />
Auxins 228<br />
Avirulence 171<br />
Avirulent 153<br />
Avoid<strong>an</strong>ce 227<br />
Azolla 58
372 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
B<br />
Bacillus thuringiensis 15,160<br />
Backcross 36,39,161,175,176, 209<br />
Bacteria 58,59<br />
Bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) 15<br />
Bacterial leaf blight (BLB) 242, 243,263,<br />
264<br />
Bacterial leaf streak 169<br />
Bacterial sheath rot 169<br />
Bacterial blight(BB) 15,105,107,144,148,<br />
150,151,154,156,157,169,182,183,<br />
184, 185,186,211,244, 271, 273, 274,<br />
275, 278, 279, 289, 290,307<br />
Bactericide 209<br />
Bengal descent group 364<br />
Biodiversity 2, 7, 8, 54, 61<br />
Biolistic method 211<br />
Biological 4,54<br />
Biomass 5,33, 74, 77,100,101, 104, 273,<br />
289<br />
Biometrical 30,131,138<br />
Biosynthesis 87,223<br />
Biosys tema tics 288<br />
Biotechnology 4,14, 7, 32,44, 69,159,161,<br />
209, 233, 234, 236, 241, 271, 272<br />
Biotic 59,225,271,306<br />
Biotic stress 1,273<br />
Biotype 147,150, 153,155,162,194,195,<br />
196,197, 202, 203, 272, 273, 277, 282<br />
Bivalents 292, 314, 327, 328,329<br />
Blast 16,17, 59, 74,105,107,144,146,147,<br />
148.149.150.154.156.157, 161,169,<br />
170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,<br />
178,180, 211, 229,242, 243, 244, 271,<br />
273, 274, 279,282, 289,290<br />
Blight 59<br />
Blue-green algae 58<br />
Boro 40,62<br />
Boron toxicity 224,229<br />
Brachy<strong>an</strong>thae 314,321<br />
Brown pl<strong>an</strong>t hopper (BPH) 16,17,105,<br />
107.144.145.146.148.149.155.157,<br />
159,160,192,194,196,197,198, 211,<br />
246, 247,271, 273, 274, 275, 277, 278,<br />
279, 281, 282, 289, 306, 307<br />
Brown spot 155,158,169, 186<br />
Bulk method 126,209<br />
Bulu 41,360<br />
Bush fallow 66<br />
Calcareous 219<br />
Calcareous saline sodic 221,231<br />
Carbon assimilation 89<br />
Carbon partitioning 79,80<br />
Cellular <strong>genetics</strong> 280<br />
Central <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute<br />
(CRRI) 151,187,359<br />
Centro International de Agricultura<br />
Tropical (CIAT) 182, 224,232,236<br />
Centromere 292, 293,297,298,299<br />
Chemical control 59<br />
Chitinase 16,17,153,161,189<br />
Chloroplast 77,78,80<br />
ChloroplastDNA (ctDNA) 331,333,<br />
334,335, 336<br />
Chloroplast genome 334,336<br />
Chromosomal interch<strong>an</strong>ge 301<br />
Chromosome complement 292<br />
Clone 283,334<br />
Cloning 15,161, 234, 236, 338<br />
CO2 fixation 77<br />
CO2 assimilation 79<br />
Coastal lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 222<br />
Coastal plains 354<br />
Coastal saline 229<br />
Coastal salinity 220,228,230<br />
Coastal swamp 223<br />
Coat protein (CP) 18<br />
Codomin<strong>an</strong>t 210,211<br />
Codon 15<br />
Cold toler<strong>an</strong>ce 14,107<br />
Combining ability 31,33,113,175,233<br />
Complementary domin<strong>an</strong>t genes 190<br />
Complementary gene 150,180,187,189,<br />
202<br />
Complete resist<strong>an</strong>ce 181,243<br />
Computer simulation 127<br />
Conservation 55,61,70,83<br />
Consultative Group on International<br />
Agriculture Research (CGIAR) 6,14<br />
Correlation 131,152,153,253<br />
Covari<strong>an</strong>ce 138<br />
Crop intensification 62<br />
Crop rotation 67<br />
Cropping intensity 56<br />
Cropping system 62, 66, 70<br />
Cropping systems 5,7,14,104,145<br />
Crystal protein 160<br />
Cultivated rice 354, 361, 315, 316, 332,<br />
333, 337<br />
Cultivated species 315, 316<br />
Cyto<strong>genetics</strong> 287,288,290,296,301,319,<br />
320,322,332, 334,338
Index 373<br />
Cytoplasm 31, 36, 40,41, 79, 83,148, 275<br />
Cytoplasmic gene 15<br />
Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) 13, 34,<br />
36,37, 38, 39, 41, 42, 46, 47,113, 248,<br />
249, 273, 274, 275, 289<br />
D<br />
Dead hearts 204, 205<br />
Deep water 2, 6,14, 25, 64, 65, 70, 73, 87,<br />
88<br />
Deficiency 219, 221, 222, 234<br />
Deforestation 66, 70, 74<br />
Deletions 334,337<br />
Deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) 15,265,<br />
280<br />
Diallel <strong>an</strong>alysis 177, 233<br />
Diallel selective mating (DSM) 206<br />
Differentiation 317, 359, 361, 364<br />
Digenic 172,175, 253<br />
Dilatory resist<strong>an</strong>ce 146<br />
Diploid 279, 288, 290, 293, 294, 296, 298,<br />
299, 301, 350, 354, 314, 317, 318, 321,<br />
322, 323, 327, 332, 335, 339, 340<br />
Directorate of <strong>Rice</strong> Research (DRR) 187<br />
Disease 4,13,17,36,42,45,59,69,75,103,<br />
104,105,120,122,135, 143,144,145,<br />
156,158,169,196,197, 209, 210, 234,<br />
246, 271, 272,273<br />
Disease escape 180<br />
Disease forecasting 59<br />
Disease resist<strong>an</strong>ce 17,82,102<br />
Disj unction of chromosome 330<br />
Disomic 276, 277, 279,300<br />
Distorted segregation 112<br />
Diversification 63, 67, 71,145<br />
DNA finger printing 161,162<br />
DNA hybridization 290<br />
DNA marker 4,15,280<br />
DNA probe 336<br />
DNA-chip technology 264<br />
Domesticated 360<br />
Domestication 357<br />
Domin<strong>an</strong>ce 28, 30,137, 253, 360, 362<br />
Domin<strong>an</strong>ce effects 177, 233<br />
Domin<strong>an</strong>t 41,135,148,149,150,151,171,<br />
174,175,176,177,178,179,184,187,<br />
194,195,199,200, 201,202, 210, 233,<br />
275, 282,358<br />
Domin<strong>an</strong>t complementary gene 172<br />
Double cropping 69<br />
Double trisomics 293<br />
Drought 6,13,14, 25, 46, 65, 73, 74, 75, 76,<br />
78, 80, 82, 90, 272, 280, 289<br />
Drought avoid<strong>an</strong>ce 82, 83, 273<br />
Drought escape 82<br />
Drought toler<strong>an</strong>ce 82, 83, 273<br />
Duplex genotype 296<br />
Duplication 293<br />
Durable resist<strong>an</strong>ce 59<br />
Dwarf 169<br />
Early , generation selection 125,127<br />
Ecogenetic 353, 356, 361<br />
Ecology 54,56,63,70,232,351,325<br />
Ecospecies 353,364<br />
Ecosystem 2, 3,4, 5,6, 7,10, 65, 73, 74, 90;<br />
144,158,181, 362, 363<br />
Ecosystem 65,146<br />
Ecotourism 65<br />
Ecotype 88, 232, 349, 353, 357, 358, 361,<br />
362, 363<br />
Electromorphs 357<br />
Electron acceptors 78<br />
Electron flow 79<br />
Electron tr<strong>an</strong>sport 78<br />
Electrophoresis 331<br />
Electrophoretic pattern 331<br />
Electroporation 15,16,211<br />
Elongation 14,88,273,289<br />
Embryo 340<br />
Embryo culture 329<br />
Embryo rescue 14,44,45,160,276,277,<br />
279,307<br />
Environment 30,54,55,68<br />
Environmentally sensitive genetic male<br />
sterility (EGMS) 34<br />
Epidemiological 146<br />
Epiphytotic 59,69<br />
Epistasis 30,31,254<br />
Epistatic effects 210<br />
Epistatic interaction 189<br />
Erosion 65<br />
Ethylene 86, 87,88, 89<br />
Etiology 183,187,189,193<br />
Evapotr<strong>an</strong>spiration 80<br />
Evolutionary trends 338<br />
Expressivity 135<br />
Extra chromosome 293,295,296,297,298,<br />
299<br />
False smut 144,145<br />
Farming systems 5, 8, 68, 69, 71<br />
Fauna 59<br />
Female gamete 110
374 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
Fertility restoration 35, 248, 249,250<br />
Fertilizers 56,59, 61, 209<br />
Field resist<strong>an</strong>ce 146,173,180<br />
Field screening 226<br />
Field toler<strong>an</strong>ce 147<br />
Fishery 69<br />
Floating rice 88<br />
Flood 56,57,87,88<br />
Flood plains 6<br />
Flood water 84,85,89,90<br />
Flooded rice 7,64<br />
Flooding 6,10,74,84<br />
Flood-prone 46<br />
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)<br />
331, 332<br />
Food <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Agriculture Org<strong>an</strong>ization<br />
(FAO) 10,11, 54, 55, 71,119, 229, 287<br />
Forestry 55,69<br />
Fossil energy 70<br />
Fossil fuel 3,71<br />
Fungi 58, 59, 243<br />
Fungicides 209<br />
Gall dwarf 201<br />
Gall midge (GM) 17,144,147,148,149,<br />
150.152.155.157.159.162.198, 201,<br />
202,203, 211,246<br />
Gamete 109, 111, 296<br />
Gamete abortion 109, 111, 112<br />
Gametophyte 35,37,41,44, 77<br />
Gene center 184<br />
Gene gun 211<br />
Gene mapping 241<br />
Gene pool 115,161,206,245, 264, 272,<br />
273, 275<br />
Gene tagging 211,241<br />
Gene-for-gene 150,170<br />
Generalized resist<strong>an</strong>ce 146<br />
Genetic 1,28,30,31,32,38,42,57,59,60,<br />
99,105,112,113,116,146,155,159,184,<br />
190.198, 200, 201, 202, 205,225, 233,<br />
236,241, 242, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250,<br />
251,252, 253, 254,263,301,361<br />
Genetic barrier 353,316,317,318,319,353<br />
Genetic base 121,125,145,283<br />
Genetic control 58<br />
Genetic correlation 128,129,130,131,<br />
132,137,138<br />
Genetic differentiation 330,364<br />
Genetic dist<strong>an</strong>ce 108<br />
Genetic diversity 31,46,61,145,197,361<br />
Genetic drift 121<br />
Genetic engineering 160, 211, 265, 283<br />
Genetic erosion 2,60<br />
Genetic imbal<strong>an</strong>ce 296, 301<br />
Genetic linkage 296<br />
Genetic male sterile 207<br />
Genetic m<strong>an</strong>ipulation 101,241<br />
Genetic map 4,15<br />
Genetic origin 358<br />
Genetic parameters 122<br />
Genetic resist<strong>an</strong>ce 120,159<br />
Genetic resource 55<br />
Genetic variability 272<br />
Genetic vari<strong>an</strong>ce 138<br />
Genetic variation 121,125,132,133,137,<br />
335<br />
Genome 36,160,241,248,254,264,272,<br />
275, 279, 280, 281, 288, 290, 291, 350,<br />
317, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330,<br />
332, 333, 337, 338, 340<br />
Genome evolution 337<br />
Genome mapping 265<br />
Genome <strong>an</strong>alysis 338<br />
Genomic constitution 350,354,355,317,<br />
318, 323, 325, 326,327,335<br />
Genotype 30,35,59,82,86,103,109,110,<br />
114,128,134,135,136,146,170,171,<br />
184,185,210,227, 230,231,232,233,<br />
252, 296,362<br />
Genotype environment interaction 134,<br />
135<br />
Geographic distribution 347,351,359<br />
Geographic origin 335<br />
Geographical race 328<br />
Germplasm 61,82,84,105,107,108,184,<br />
189, 205,206,225, 229,234, 251,252, 273<br />
Gibberellin biosynthesis 87<br />
Gibberellin deficient 88<br />
Gluconase 153<br />
Glycolytic pathway 331<br />
Grain density 103<br />
Grain quality 247,248<br />
Gramineae 287,288<br />
Gr<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>iglumis 190,272,273,289,319,320,<br />
321,323,325,326,327,330,331, 332,<br />
335, 341<br />
Grassy stunt 59,105,169,192,193,273,<br />
274, 275,289<br />
Green house gas 7,12,64<br />
Green leaf hopper (GLH) 105,107,144,<br />
148,149,151,175,189,195,197,199,<br />
200,201,246,273, 274,289
Index 375<br />
Green leaf m<strong>an</strong>uring 66<br />
Green m<strong>an</strong>uring 234<br />
Green revolution 1,2,5,53,54,55,68,<br />
143,145<br />
Gross national product (GNP) 19<br />
Gundhi bug 144<br />
Gundil 360<br />
H<br />
Haploid 14,15,30,301<br />
Haplotype 128<br />
Hardp<strong>an</strong> 56,75<br />
Harvest Index (HI) 1,2,24,33,100,101,<br />
104<br />
Herbicide 16<br />
Heritability 122,123,138,189<br />
Heritable 132<br />
Heritable variation 123,126<br />
Heterobeltiosis 24,29<br />
Heterochroma tic 292,296<br />
Heterosis 12,23,24,25,28,29,30,31,44,<br />
45, 46, 47,108,110,113,120,122,123,<br />
132,136,137, 251, 252, 253, 254<br />
Heterotic 31,32,33,43<br />
Heterozygote 30,128,129,252<br />
Heterozygous 174<br />
High yielding varieties (HYV) 1,54,56,<br />
60, 61, 62, 63, 68,144,145<br />
Hill rices 362<br />
Hispa 144,152<br />
Hoja bl<strong>an</strong>ca 169, 211<br />
Homeostasis 339<br />
Homologous 272,283,295,297,298,301,<br />
306,326,327,329<br />
Homology 327,328,329<br />
Homozygote 30,253<br />
Homozygous 28,128,133,135,174,299<br />
Hopper burn 194,197<br />
Horizontal resist<strong>an</strong>ce 146,181<br />
Hormone 89<br />
Host parasite interaction 154,173<br />
Host pl<strong>an</strong>t resist<strong>an</strong>ce 146, 156,209<br />
Hot spots 182,226,227,231<br />
Hrmsea 353,357,360,361,362,363<br />
Hsien 360<br />
Hybrid 12, 25, 26, 27, 28, 32,33, 34, 37, 39,<br />
42, 43, 44, 47,112,115,120,136,137,<br />
248, 251, 252,264, 275,279,306,318,<br />
323,326,327,323, 326,327,329,357,<br />
358,360, 361,362<br />
Hybrid barrier 116<br />
Hybrid embryo 276<br />
Hybrid polymorphs 357<br />
Hybrid population 355<br />
Hybrid rice 3,12,23,45,60,70,80,108,<br />
110, 249<br />
Hybrid sterility 109,110, 111, 113,114,<br />
115,116,251<br />
Hybrid sterility gene loci (HSGLi) 112,<br />
113,115<br />
Hybrid vigor 23<br />
Hybridization 32,37,116,173,209, 229,<br />
231,296,336, 337,340<br />
Hydrogen sulfide toxicity 224<br />
Hydrophytes 314,339<br />
Hydrophytic 339<br />
Hypersensitive 153<br />
I<br />
Ideotype 102,105,120<br />
Idiogram 291, 298, 299,302<br />
Immune 184<br />
Immunity 146<br />
Inbred 28<br />
In<strong>breeding</strong> 125<br />
Incompatibility 306<br />
Indica 12,32, 33, 37, 38, 41, 42, 43, 46,107,<br />
108, 109,110, 111, 113,115,120,122,<br />
125,127,131,174,175,176,177,229,<br />
232, 243,249,250,251,252, 253,288,<br />
291, 293,294,296,301,331,333,335,<br />
336,337,357,364<br />
Indicoides 341<br />
Inhibitor 17, 82,83,87,88,160,161,172,<br />
187<br />
Inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> salinity 220,228,230<br />
Inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> swamps 6<br />
Inl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> valley swamps 6,223,232<br />
Insect pests 4,13,16,42,148,169,193,209<br />
Insect resist<strong>an</strong>ce 17,45,102,105, 210,246<br />
Insectide 59<br />
Insects 58,103,105,147,152,155, 234, 271<br />
Insertions 334,337<br />
Integrated nutrient m<strong>an</strong>agement (INM) 4,<br />
58<br />
Integrated pest m<strong>an</strong>agement (IPM) 4,58,<br />
59 61,159,162<br />
Intellectual property rights 264<br />
Interallelic 31<br />
Interecotypic 356,358,361, 362<br />
Integenomic 330<br />
Intermolecular 334<br />
International Institute of Tropical<br />
Agriculture (IITA) 232
376 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
International Network for Genetic<br />
Evaluation of <strong>Rice</strong> (INGER) 136, 205,<br />
206, 208, 234<br />
Internarional <strong>Rice</strong> Acid Lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />
Observation Nursery (IRALON) 234<br />
International <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (IRRI)<br />
10,12,14, 27, 42, 81,100,105,119,120,<br />
121,124,136,148,149,151,181,182,<br />
186, 188,192, 201, 205, 206, 208) 224,<br />
226, 231, 232, 236,. 250, 274, 275, 283, 293<br />
International <strong>Rice</strong> Salinity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Alkalinity<br />
Toler<strong>an</strong>ce Observation Nursery<br />
(IRSATON) 234<br />
International <strong>Rice</strong> Stem Borer Nursery<br />
(IRSBN) 207<br />
International <strong>Rice</strong> Testing Program<br />
(IRTP) 234<br />
Interspecific 36, 44, 275, 276, 277, 278,<br />
279, 306, 358, 360<br />
Interspecific differentiation 336<br />
Interspecific hybrids 324, 325,328, 329,<br />
330<br />
Inter-subspecific 110<br />
Intra-allélic 31<br />
Intraecotypic 358<br />
Intragenomic 330<br />
Intramolecular 334<br />
Introgress 273,274, 275, 307<br />
Introgression 15,121,242,274,275,276,<br />
277, 278, 279, 280, 281,282,283> 288, '<br />
306, 316, 335, 338, 352,357,362<br />
Introgressive hybridization 317,318,353<br />
Iron chlorosis 226,231,235<br />
Iron deficiency 223, 228,230, 231<br />
Iron toxicity 223,225,227,228,229,230,<br />
231, 232, 233,235, 236,263<br />
Irrigated 2, 3,10,11,45,55,56,60, 62, 63,<br />
70, 73,144,181, 223, 360, 361<br />
Irrigation 57,61<br />
Isochromosome 297,298,299<br />
Isoelectric focusing (IBP) 331<br />
Isogenic 31, 39,170, 248<br />
Isogenomic 330<br />
Isolate 243<br />
Isolate specific resist<strong>an</strong>ce 151<br />
Isozyme 31, 32,112, 210, 211, 290, 291,<br />
296, 331, 332, 335, 336, 338, 357, 360<br />
Isozyme marker 334<br />
J<br />
Japónica 12, 32, 36, 37,38, 40, 42, 43, 46,<br />
107, 109,110, 111, 113,150,175,176,<br />
180,188, 229, 230, 243, 251, 253, 276,<br />
288, 291, 292, 293, 294, 296, 301, 331,<br />
333, 335, 336,337353, 357, 358, 360, 361,<br />
362,363, 364<br />
Japonicoides 341<br />
Jav<strong>an</strong>ica 32,33,112, 113,115, 331,333,<br />
353,357,360,361,362', 364<br />
K<br />
Karotype 161,295<br />
Karyomorphology 291<br />
Keng 360,361<br />
Kinetochores 302<br />
Kresek 182,,183<br />
L<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> race 353, 360<br />
Laterite soil 289<br />
latifoliae 314, 318,320, 325, 339,340, 341<br />
Leaf area index 24<br />
Leaf blast 170,171,178<br />
Leaf folder 16,17,144,145,152,153,155,<br />
211, 273, 289<br />
Leaf hopper 152,189,246<br />
Leaf scald 145<br />
Leersia hex<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ra 209,321<br />
Lethal genes 109<br />
Likage disequilibrium 128,129,131,137<br />
Linkage 30,41,128,129,150,174,175,<br />
195, 241,247, 248, 280,282,293, 296,<br />
299,300<br />
Linkage mapping 296<br />
Lodging 104<br />
Lodging resist<strong>an</strong>ce 103,104,105,107<br />
Lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 2,3,10,14,46,64,65,70,73,74,<br />
75,82,131,156,170, 223,230,233,361,<br />
363, 364<br />
M<br />
Maintainer 35,36,38,39,42,46,113<br />
Major gene effects 248<br />
Major genes 177,180,181,248,261,262<br />
Male sterility facilitated recurrent selection<br />
(MSRS) 207,209<br />
M<strong>an</strong>grove 6,70,233<br />
M<strong>an</strong>grove swamp 220<br />
M<strong>an</strong>ure 57<br />
Mapping 241, 242, 243, 246, 247,248, 249,<br />
254, 261, 263, 282, 283
Ir\dex 377<br />
Marker aided selection 160,203,210,241,<br />
247,263, 264<br />
Marker gene 296,299, .300<br />
Markers 15,110,112,114,210,248,249,<br />
251, 253, 262, 296,300,302,331,332<br />
Mass selection 209<br />
Me<strong>an</strong> 133<br />
Mech<strong>an</strong>ization 60<br />
Mekong descent group 363<br />
Mesophytes 314<br />
Metacentric 298<br />
Meth<strong>an</strong>e 7,12, 64, 86<br />
Meyeri<strong>an</strong>ae 314, 322<br />
Micronutrient 14<br />
Micronutrient deficiency 5,13,56<br />
Microprojectile bombardment 16<br />
Microsporogenesis 38<br />
Mid parent heterosis 24<br />
Migration 357,362<br />
Mining 57,58,70<br />
Minor genes 181,185,187<br />
Misdivision 297<br />
Mitochondria 81<br />
Mitochondrial DNA 336<br />
Mixed cropping 7<br />
Modified pedigree method 126<br />
Modifier 171,174,179<br />
Molecular genetic 287<br />
Molecular hybridization 332<br />
Molecular linkage 288, 299,302<br />
Molecular marker 4,18,44,45,46,107,<br />
160, 210, 211, 241, 242, 244,246, 247,<br />
248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 263<br />
Molecular probe 15<br />
Molecular studies 331<br />
Molecular tagging 282<br />
Molecular techniques 181<br />
Monocrop 62,71<br />
Monoculture 56,60,145<br />
Monogenic 42,109,146,147,175, 242, 243<br />
Monograph 313<br />
Monomorphic 280,331<br />
Monophyletic origin 355<br />
Monosomie alien addition line 276,288,<br />
306, 307<br />
Monosomies 301<br />
Morphometric 334<br />
Multi line 181<br />
Multiple allele 170<br />
Multiple cropping 70<br />
Multiple nutrient stress 219<br />
Multiple resist<strong>an</strong>ce 176,196, 206<br />
Multivalent 330<br />
Multivariate 31,32,132<br />
Mutagenesis 250<br />
Mut<strong>an</strong>t 42,43,44,170<br />
Mutation 114> 116,121, 209, 249,341<br />
N<br />
Narrow brown leaf spot 169<br />
National Agriculture Research Stations<br />
(NARS) 6,236<br />
Natural enemies 58,145<br />
Natural hybrid 351,353,354,355<br />
Natural hybridization 316, 317, 351, 356<br />
Natural resource 55<br />
Natural selection 341<br />
Near isogenic lines (NILs) 242,280<br />
Neck blast 170,178, 179<br />
Negative heterosis 24<br />
Neutral allele 112<br />
New pl<strong>an</strong>t type 105,106,107<br />
Nitrifying bacteria 85<br />
Nitrite oxide 12<br />
Nitrogen fixation 57<br />
Nodal root 88<br />
Non allelic interaction 30<br />
Non homologous 272,292<br />
Non specific resist<strong>an</strong>ce 245<br />
Nuclear 31<br />
Nuclear DNA 331,334<br />
Nuclear genome 336,337<br />
Nuclear orgjmizing regions (NOR) 332<br />
Nucleolus 292<br />
Nucleolus org<strong>an</strong>izer<br />
Nutrient deficiency<br />
Nutrient imbal<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
Nutrient interaction<br />
Nutrient m<strong>an</strong>agement<br />
Nutrients 58,101<br />
O<br />
292<br />
89,220<br />
224<br />
225<br />
57<br />
O. abromeiti<strong>an</strong>a 322<br />
O. aha 272, 273, 289, 319, 320, 321, 323,<br />
324, 325, 327, 328, 330, 331, 332, 335,<br />
336.337.341.347<br />
O. <strong>an</strong>gustifolia 313,321,323,329,339,340,<br />
347<br />
O. australiensis 160,196,197,198,210,211,<br />
246, 272, 273, 274, 279, 282, 289, 306,<br />
307, 319, 320, 321, 323, 329, 331, 333,<br />
334, 335, 337, 339, 347<br />
O, barthii 36,188,209,316,317,318,323,<br />
324.330.331.347
378 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
O. brachy<strong>an</strong>tha 160, 209, 210, 272, 273, 274,<br />
279, 289, 314, 321, 323, 329, 331, 333,<br />
338,339, 347<br />
. breviligulata 272, 273,289,290,291,<br />
316, 317, 324, 347<br />
coarctata 313, 355<br />
collina 320,325,326, 328<br />
cubensis 350, 324, 347<br />
eichengiri 209,272,273,289,319,320,<br />
321, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 332,<br />
333, 335, 339, 340, 341, 347<br />
fatua 351,355<br />
glaberrima 36, 234,272, 273, 288,289,<br />
290, 291, 294, 317,318, 315, 316,323,<br />
324, 330,331, 341, 342, 347,349,350,355<br />
glaberrima f. stapfii 316,324<br />
glumaepatula 37, 272, 273, 275, 289,317,<br />
318,323, 324, 330,333, 347350, 355<br />
O . g 'ramlata 160,272,274, 288, 289, 290,<br />
322, 331, 347<br />
ind<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>am<strong>an</strong>ica 288,290,322<br />
latifolia 160,190,209,210,272,273, 279,<br />
289, 314,318, 319,320, 324, 325, 326,<br />
327, 328, 330,331, 332, 333, 335, 336,<br />
337, 339, 347<br />
hngiglumis 272,274, 290,322,331,340,<br />
347<br />
longstaminata 36, 184,185,209,210,<br />
211, 244, 272, 273, 274, 275, 280, 289,<br />
291, 316, 317, 318, 323, 330, 331, 347,<br />
350, 355,<br />
malampzhuaensis 190, 319,320, 323,<br />
324, 327, 328, 335, 340, 341<br />
meridionalis 272, 273, 289,315,317,318,<br />
323, 330, 335, 341, 347<br />
meyeriam 209, 272,274, 288, 289, 290,<br />
313, 314, 322, 323, 331, 335, 339, 340, 347<br />
minuta 160, 178,190, 209, 210, 272, 273,<br />
274, 278, 282, 289, 319, 320, 321, 323,<br />
324, 326, 327, 328, 329, 331, 332, 335,<br />
340, 341, 347354, 355,<br />
nvara 36,37,181,192,193, 209, 210,<br />
272, 273, 274, 275, 289, 290, 291, 315,<br />
316, 317, 323, 330, 331, 335, 341, 347,<br />
351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358,<br />
359, 360, 361, 362, 364<br />
0 . officinalis 160,190, 209, 210, 272,273,<br />
274, 277, 278, 280, 281, 282, 288, 289,<br />
306, 307, 308, 318, 319, 320, 321, 323,<br />
326, 327, 328, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334,<br />
335, 337, 339, 340, 341, 347354, 355<br />
o . paraguainensis 320, 324, 325, 329<br />
O.perennis 36,37,272,273,274,275,317,<br />
318, 324, 331, 350, 351, 355, 356<br />
O. perennis subsp. balunga 317<br />
O. perennis subsp. barlhii 317<br />
O. perennis subsp. cubensis 317<br />
O. perrieri 190,313, 314,321, 323,339,340,<br />
347<br />
O. punctata 209,272,273, 276,277, 288,<br />
289,319, 320, 321, 323,326,327,331,<br />
332, 333, 334, 341, 347<br />
O, rhizomatis 272, 273,289, 318, 319,320,<br />
327, 328, 340<br />
O. ridleyi 209, 210, 272, 274, 288, 290, 314,<br />
322,323,331,339, 340, 347<br />
O. rufipogon 36,37,40,188,209,234, 272,<br />
273, 275,289,290, 291,315,316,317,<br />
318,323,324,330,331,332,333,335,<br />
341,347,350,351,352,353, 354,355,<br />
356,357,362<br />
O. saliva 36,40,160,272, 273,276, 278,<br />
279, 280, 281, 282,283,288, 289,290,<br />
291, 294,306,307,308,314,315, 318,<br />
323, 324,326,327,329,330,331, 332,<br />
333, 334,335,336,341,342, 347, 349,<br />
350,351, 353,354, 355,356, 361,362,<br />
363, 364,<br />
O, saliva var/fli«fl 351<br />
O. schleeteri 272,288,290,314,322,323,<br />
339,340, 347<br />
O. schweinfurthi<strong>an</strong>a 190,319,320,323,324,<br />
326, 335, 341, 347<br />
O.tisser<strong>an</strong>ti 313,321, 323,339,340,347<br />
Or<strong>an</strong>ge leaf 169<br />
Org<strong>an</strong>ophosphorous compunds 145<br />
Origin 31, 32,349,354,355,359,361<br />
Oryza 272, 275, 287, 288, 290, 313, 314,<br />
355, 321, 322, 323, 329, 332, 333, 334,<br />
335,338,339<br />
Oryza saliva f, spont<strong>an</strong>ea 36,40,271,274,<br />
275, 351, 315, 316, 324<br />
Oryza species 122,196,274<br />
Oryzeae 233, 288, 313<br />
Oryzoideae 287, 288<br />
Over domin<strong>an</strong>ce 28,30,136,253<br />
Oxidative phosphorylation 89<br />
Pachytene <strong>an</strong>alysis 301<br />
Pachytene chromosome 292,295,301,306<br />
Pachytene idiogram 302<br />
Pachytene trivalent 298
Index 379<br />
Padia 314, 322,329,339, 340<br />
Parallel variation 318, 350<br />
Partial resist<strong>an</strong>ce 146,147,180,181,182,<br />
243<br />
Particle bombardment 16<br />
Pathogen 4,146,1 5 3 ,1 5 4 ,1 7 0 ,1 8 4 , 229,<br />
245<br />
Pathogenicity 183,184,187,188,193<br />
Pathotype 158,161,181,184,185<br />
Peat soils 222,230,235<br />
Pedigree 126,127,132<br />
Pedigree method 121,125,209,229<br />
Penetr<strong>an</strong>ce 135<br />
Penyakit merah 199<br />
Perennial 3 1 6 ,322,333,335,339,340,341<br />
Perennial swamp 316<br />
Perermial wild 352<br />
Perennial wild species 350,355<br />
Perermial species 318,352,356<br />
P e r r ie r a n a e 314,321<br />
Pest 36, 58, 6 9 ,1 2 0 ,122,143,144,145,153,<br />
196,197, 246<br />
Pesticide 4, 56,100,143,159, 209<br />
Phenols 153,154<br />
Phenotype 121,128,132,138,148, 299<br />
Phenotypic 296<br />
Phenotypic variation 262<br />
Phnoloxidases 154<br />
Phosphorous deficiency 222,225,226,<br />
227, 229, 230, 232, 233, 236<br />
Photoinsensitive 145,362<br />
Photoperiod 2,249<br />
Photoperiod insensitive 315,353,359,361<br />
Photoperiod sensitive 82,229,234,261,<br />
262, 352, 353, 362<br />
Photoperiod sensitive genetic male sterility<br />
(PGMS) 3 ,4 2 ,4 3 ,2 4 9 ,2 5 0<br />
Photophosphorylation 79<br />
Photorespiration 78,79<br />
Photosensitive 175,231,315,358<br />
Photosynthate 103<br />
Photosynthesis 7 7 ,7 8 ,7 9 ,8 1 ,8 4 ,8 5 ,9 0 ,<br />
101,104,106<br />
Phylogenetic 290,333,339,357<br />
Phylogenetic relationships 331,334,338<br />
Physical map 293,334<br />
Phytoalexine 154<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>t genome 160<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>t hopper 152,153,246<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>t ideotype 11<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>t nutrients 54, 57, 234<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>t type 2 ,1 1 ,1 2 ,5 9 ,6 8 ,1 0 0 ,1 0 1 ,1 0 5 ,<br />
1 2 0 ,1 2 1 ,1 24,131,190,191,192,205, 207<br />
Pl<strong>an</strong>thopper 144<br />
Pleiotropy 128,129,210<br />
Ploidy 330<br />
Poaceae 287,288<br />
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis<br />
(PAGE) 331<br />
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 15,16<br />
Polygenes 5 9 ,1 5 1 ,162,172,173,175,177,<br />
■ 180,185,205,211<br />
Polygenic resist<strong>an</strong>ce 147<br />
Polymorphism 280,291,335,337<br />
Polyphagous pest 147<br />
Polyphyletic origin 354,363<br />
Polyploid 335<br />
Polyploidization 335<br />
Poly topic 363<br />
Population 1 ,2 ,9 ,1 0 ,5 3 ,6 5 ,7 1 ,9 9 ,1 1 9 ,<br />
128,138,161,162,171,206,208, 219,<br />
261,334, 357,359,361<br />
Porleresia coarctata 209,233,355<br />
Primary gene pool 209,272,274<br />
Primary trisomics 288,293,294,295, 296,<br />
2 9 7 ,298,299,301,306,307<br />
Primitive 360<br />
Primitive cultivar 362<br />
Primitive ecotype 358<br />
Primitive species 338<br />
Problem soils 54,219,220,231,235<br />
Progenitor 357,361<br />
Projectile bombardment 211<br />
Prophylaxis 59<br />
Protease 15,17<br />
Protoclonal variation 15<br />
Protoplast 15<br />
Protoplast fusion 15,16,44, 45<br />
Pure line selection 209<br />
Putative progenitors 354<br />
Pyramiding 147,160,180,181,189,263<br />
Pyrethroids 145<br />
Q<br />
Quadrivalent 322, 329<br />
Qualitative 146,147,151, 243<br />
Qualitative resist<strong>an</strong>ce 245<br />
Qu<strong>an</strong>titative 2 8 ,3 0 ,1 7 3 ,2 1 1 ,2 4 6 , 247<br />
Qu<strong>an</strong>titative characters 122,125,132, 254<br />
Qu<strong>an</strong>titative resist<strong>an</strong>ce 146,156,243,245<br />
Qu<strong>an</strong>titativetraitloci(QTL) 149,181, 211,<br />
243, 245, 246, 247, 250, 252, 253, 254,<br />
261, 262, 264, 265, 283
380 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
R<br />
Race non specific resist<strong>an</strong>ce 146,147<br />
Races 150,158,176,188, 272, 273, 279,307<br />
Race specific resist<strong>an</strong>ce 146,147<br />
Ragged stunt 169<br />
Rainfed 2,10,13,14,46, 64, 65,70,73, 74,<br />
75,80,82, 90,144,156,222,359,361<br />
Rainfed systems 10<br />
R<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om amplified polymorphic DNA<br />
(RAPD) 32, 242, 251, 280, 282<br />
R<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om chromatid segregation 296<br />
R<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om chromosome segregation 296<br />
Rapid generation adv<strong>an</strong>ce (RGA) 231<br />
Rate reducing resist<strong>an</strong>ce 146<br />
Ratooning 25,353<br />
Recessive 42, 135,148,149,150,151,174,<br />
185,187,194,195,199,200,202,210,<br />
251, 299,300<br />
Recessive effects 177<br />
Reciprocal effects 233<br />
Reciprocal tr<strong>an</strong>slocation 301<br />
Recurrent selection 206<br />
Repetitive DNA 161,296,337, 338<br />
Repetitive sequences for genome<br />
specificity 331,337<br />
Resist<strong>an</strong>ce 59, 83,101,135,143,147,149,<br />
150,152, 153,154,156,158,160,169,<br />
170,171,172,174,175,177,178,185,<br />
187,190,191, 195,196,197,198,199,<br />
200,201, 205, 206,207,208,227,229,<br />
242, 243, 264, 273, 274, 277, 279, 280,<br />
282, 289<br />
Restitution nuclei 326<br />
Restorer 37,38,39,40, 41,42,46,113<br />
Restriction <strong>an</strong>alysis 331,334<br />
Restriction Endonuclease Analysis 333<br />
Restriction fragment length polymorphism<br />
(RFLP) 31,161,162, 210, 211, 242, 248,<br />
251, 280, 281, 290, 296, 299, 301, 306,<br />
334,335,336, 338<br />
Rhizomatous 289<br />
Rhizosphere 85<br />
Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) 293,296,332,<br />
333, 338<br />
Ribosomal gene 338<br />
Ribosome activity enzyme (RIP) 16<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> 1, 2, 5,10, 25, 26, 27, 30, 34, 39,42,53,<br />
54, 56, 62, 99,104, 271, 275<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> based cropping 66<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> cropping system 63,145<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> dwarf 199, 200<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> farming 60,61, 62, 64,68, 71<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> gall dwarf 200<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> production '73<br />
Ridley<strong>an</strong>ae 314, 322, 340<br />
Rodents 58<br />
Root respiration 81,82,85<br />
Root system 104<br />
Saline 219,232,235<br />
Saline soils 221<br />
Salinity 13,56,60,63,220,221,225,226,<br />
227,229, 231,233, 236,272<br />
Salinity toler<strong>an</strong>t 355<br />
Salinization 4<br />
Salt injury, 227<br />
Salt toler<strong>an</strong>ce 14,25, 230, 233<br />
Satellite chromosome 332<br />
Sativa 315<br />
Sativae 314, 317, 318, 339, 341<br />
Schtechieri<strong>an</strong>ae 314,322<br />
Screening 225,236<br />
Secondary chromosome 297<br />
Secondary ecotypes 361,362<br />
Secondary gene pool 272,275<br />
Secondary trisomics 288,297,298,299,<br />
300<br />
Seed 70<br />
Seihr 353,357,358,359, 360,361,362,363<br />
Selection 125,128<br />
Selection efficiency 210<br />
Selection index 138<br />
Selection pressure 121,354<br />
Semi-dwarf 1,3,12, 45, 59, 68, 99,100,<br />
229,231, 261<br />
Semi-sterile 110,114<br />
Shade toler<strong>an</strong>ce 274,289<br />
Shall 353,358,362,363<br />
Shallow rainfed lowl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 14<br />
Sheath blight, (ShB) 16,17,105,144,158,<br />
161,169,187,189, 245, 271, 273, 274, 289<br />
Sheath rot 144,145<br />
Shifting cultivation 55, 359<br />
Shuttle <strong>breeding</strong> 231<br />
Silicon deficiency 223,232,235<br />
Silver shoot 202<br />
Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) 242,290<br />
Single seed descent (SSD) 123,124,125,<br />
126,127,132,133,135, 209<br />
Sínica 360<br />
Sink 79,80,101,102,106<br />
Slash <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> burn 55<br />
Slot-blot-hybridization 337
Index 381<br />
Socioeconomic 54, 63,67, 209<br />
Sodic 219,235<br />
Sodicity 221,228<br />
Soil 104,235,274<br />
Soil acidity 14,183<br />
Soil amendments 234,235<br />
Soil erosion 14, 66<br />
Soil fertility 57,75<br />
Soil nitrogen 63<br />
Solar energy 103<br />
Solar radiation 104<br />
Somatic embryogenesis 44,45<br />
Somoclonal variation 15,229<br />
Southern hybridization 282,333<br />
Specific resist<strong>an</strong>ce 146,150<br />
Spont<strong>an</strong>ea 354<br />
Sporophyte 35,37,41<br />
Spring rice 62<br />
Sress toler<strong>an</strong>ce 262,263<br />
Stability 36,135,136<br />
Stabilizing selection 171<br />
Stable habitat 352<br />
Stalked eye fly 204<br />
St<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard evaluation system (SES) 206,<br />
226<br />
St<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard heterosis 24,29<br />
Starch biosynthesis 18<br />
Stem borer 16,17,105,144,145,147,148,<br />
152,153,157,160, 203, 205, 206,207,<br />
208, 211, 272, 273, 274, 279, 280, 289, 290<br />
Stem elongation 87<br />
Sterility 33,35<br />
Stoloniferous 290<br />
Stripe virus 244<br />
Striped borer 206, 208<br />
Subgenomic differentiation 330<br />
Submerged soil 224<br />
Submergence 13,14, 73, 74, 84, 85, 88,89,<br />
90, 272<br />
Submersion 62,64<br />
Submetacentric 298<br />
Sulfur deficiency 223<br />
Super rice 102,105<br />
Sustainability 54, 55,56,61,63,64,65,66,<br />
68,69<br />
Swamp 352<br />
Sympatric 354,362,340<br />
Synapsis 330<br />
Tagging 236,244, 246,247,248,263<br />
Tagging gene 210<br />
Taxa 317,324,350<br />
Taxon 351<br />
Taxonomic 317,350, 353, 354, 356<br />
Taxonomy 287,314,331<br />
Telo trisomics 288, 297, 298, 299<br />
Telocentric 297, 299<br />
Temperate japónica 32,107<br />
Temperature sensitive genetic male<br />
sterility (TGMS) 3,42,43,250,251<br />
Test cross 115<br />
Tester 112,174,324<br />
Tetraploid 44,282,288,290,355,314,318,<br />
319,320,322,323,324,325,332,335,340<br />
Tetrasomics 301<br />
Thionins 17<br />
Thrips 273<br />
Thriving with rice 5<br />
Tidal swamp 2,355<br />
Tidal wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 14,64<br />
Tillage 58<br />
Tissue culture 14,283<br />
Tjereh 41,353,358,362,363<br />
Toler<strong>an</strong>ce 227,229,233<br />
Toxicity 219,221,231, 234<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>s gene silencing 264<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>sformation 15,44,45,161,263,280,<br />
283<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>sgenic 4,15,16,17,160,211,264,280<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive segreg<strong>an</strong>ts 122,124,127,<br />
'131,137<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive segregation 233,245<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive variation 124,132<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>sitory yellowing 200<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>slocation 41,79,103<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>slocations 288<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>smission 295,299,306,307<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>spiration 76,80,81<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>sposable elements 162<br />
Trap crop 59<br />
Triple test cross 133<br />
Triplo 294,295,297<br />
Triploid 44<br />
Trisomie 41,195,248,332<br />
Trivalent 292, 298, 307, 322, 327<br />
Tropical japónica 12,46,107,120,232<br />
True resist<strong>an</strong>ce 180<br />
Tungro 18,59,105,107,144,151,157,158,<br />
161,169,189,190,191,192,199,201,<br />
244, 246<br />
Two line rice hybrids 43,113
382 <strong>Rice</strong> Breeding <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Genetics: Research Priorities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Challenges<br />
U<br />
Pnited Nations Conference on<br />
Environment <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Development<br />
(UNCED) 7<br />
Univalent 297, 298, 322, 327, 329<br />
Upl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 2, 7,10,11,13, 65, 66, 67, 70, 73,<br />
74, 76, 81, 82,170, 202, 222, 223, 231,<br />
359, 361<br />
Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade<br />
Negotiation 7<br />
Vari<strong>an</strong>ce 133,134<br />
Vari<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>alysis 123, 252, 262<br />
Vari<strong>an</strong>ce components 123<br />
Vector 59, 190,274<br />
Vertical resist<strong>an</strong>ce 146<br />
Vertifolia effect 181<br />
Virulence 171,187, 243<br />
Virulent 153,170<br />
Virus 58, 59,105,107,157,161,190,193,<br />
195, 200, 242, 246, 274<br />
W<br />
Water deficit 76, 77<br />
Water m<strong>an</strong>agement 56,58, 65<br />
Water use efficiency 57,61,68,80,81<br />
Waterlogging 56,60,86,229<br />
Weeds 4,14,58,59,63,64,65, 74,120<br />
West Afric<strong>an</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Development<br />
Association (WARDA) 224,232,236<br />
Wetl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 86,223,362<br />
Wheat 5, Ip<br />
White back pl<strong>an</strong>t hopper (WBPH) 144,<br />
148,149,157,160,197,198,199, 211,<br />
271, 273, 274, 277, 278, 279, 289, 290<br />
White borer 204<br />
White heads 204<br />
Whorl maggot 273,279,289,290<br />
Wide compatibility 336<br />
Wide compatibility gene (WCG) 33,46,<br />
113, 251<br />
Wide compatibility type 111, 250,251<br />
Wide compatibility variety (WCV) 34,<br />
109,112, 251,336<br />
Wide crosses 44<br />
Wide hybridisation 14,122,209<br />
Wild abortive (WA) 248,275, 275,248,31,<br />
36,39,41<br />
Wild rices 316<br />
Wild species 354,315<br />
Yellow dwarf 199,200<br />
Yellow mottle virus 273,289<br />
Yellow or<strong>an</strong>ge leaf 199,200,201<br />
Yield 3, 27,31,33,77,101,103,104,121,<br />
125, 254,264,265<br />
Yield components 25,29,254,264,265<br />
Yield potential 1,53,60,99,100,102,103,<br />
106,122,131, 278<br />
Zigzag leafhopper (ZLH) 197,198,201,<br />
273,274<br />
Zinc deficiency 222,225,226,227,228,<br />
229,230,231,235,236