17.05.2016 Views

Optimization of the company's cash flow

This book is about the company's treasuries and financial management, more specifically; it shows how a company can manage its treasury in an efficient and short way.

This book is about the company's treasuries and financial management, more specifically; it shows how a company can manage its treasury in an efficient and short way.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

First, to assess more than just <strong>the</strong> financial needs and, thus, save Bank Charges by an optimal choice <strong>of</strong> shortterm<br />

financing;<br />

Then, in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> structurally credit companies over a long duration, to establish <strong>the</strong> possibilities <strong>of</strong><br />

blocking <strong>of</strong> funds in volume and duration, in <strong>the</strong> most appropriate jobs;<br />

Finally, in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> companies structurally debtor for <strong>the</strong> coming period, to measure <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> permanent<br />

capital.<br />

The problem for <strong>the</strong> company now is to assess <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> its mismanagement <strong>of</strong> <strong>cash</strong>.<br />

3 - THE ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN THE TRADITIONAL CASH MANAGEMENT.<br />

By ignorance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> amounts actually available, <strong>the</strong> company has paid unnecessary costs because it has supported<br />

one discovered and funded from surpluses. In addition, through <strong>the</strong> days <strong>of</strong> value formed <strong>the</strong> "float". Float and idle<br />

<strong>cash</strong> create chances for more costs.<br />

1) - Evaluation <strong>of</strong> unnecessarily paid charges.<br />

The minimum amount <strong>of</strong> “Bank Charges”* can save by improving <strong>cash</strong> management can be calculated as follows. It<br />

totals for all banks and on throughout <strong>the</strong> year, <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> balances on <strong>the</strong> one hand, and <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> receivable<br />

balances, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand. Each result is affected by its cost: <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> discount for balances; <strong>the</strong> difference<br />

between overdraft rates and rates <strong>of</strong> discount for debit balances.<br />

TOTAL COST =<br />

∑ TOTAL CREDITOR X (THE DISCOUNT RATE / 36.000) +<br />

∑ TOTAL DEBTOR (THE OVERDRAFT RATE – THE DISCOUNT RATE) +<br />

∑ 1/20% X<br />

(STRONGEST OVERDRAFT OF THE MONTH USING A UNSUFFISANT DISCOUNT) –<br />

(STRONGEST OVERDRAFT THAT DOESN’T AVOID STRICT MANAGEMENT)<br />

Yet, this formulate is still considered as <strong>the</strong>oretical on <strong>the</strong> realistic field <strong>of</strong> companies and financial management; <strong>the</strong><br />

reason behind, is that <strong>the</strong> company’s financing condition are too different to be managed by such a complex<br />

formulate, from ano<strong>the</strong>r side, <strong>the</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company are too sensitive to any fluctuation <strong>of</strong> <strong>flow</strong>s or time, for<br />

that, <strong>the</strong> management goes with a simple arbitrage that <strong>the</strong> company does when <strong>the</strong>y compare between <strong>the</strong> financial<br />

costs paid on <strong>the</strong> behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> loan lines in few banks that <strong>the</strong>y contracted, and <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> financial pr<strong>of</strong>it that<br />

<strong>the</strong>y make from paying <strong>the</strong>ir suppliers in <strong>cash</strong>. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> company works on covering <strong>the</strong> financial costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

bank overdraft. And it works as <strong>the</strong> following example:<br />

In <strong>the</strong> BMCI and AWB accounts, <strong>the</strong> company has in total 33.000.000 DHS <strong>of</strong> Overdraft. While <strong>the</strong> company makes<br />

0.5% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>cash</strong> paid amount to <strong>the</strong> supplier INWI (that is considered as <strong>the</strong> main supplier <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company since it<br />

represents 99% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company’s turnover<br />

The company gains in <strong>the</strong> financial costs: 0.5% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paid amount (when it’s Cash). And <strong>the</strong>y pay 5.35% <strong>of</strong> financial<br />

costs when <strong>the</strong>y use <strong>the</strong> Permanent Overdraft (authorized). Knowing that <strong>the</strong> 0.5% is a daily rate, <strong>the</strong> annual rate<br />

will be equals to 6%, and <strong>the</strong> daily rate that <strong>the</strong> company use to pays its costs will be <strong>the</strong>n: 5.35%<br />

Annual Rate = Daily Rate x 12. And Daily rate = Annual rate / 12.<br />

Page 84 <strong>of</strong> 124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!