Optimization of the company's cash flow

This book is about the company's treasuries and financial management, more specifically; it shows how a company can manage its treasury in an efficient and short way. This book is about the company's treasuries and financial management, more specifically; it shows how a company can manage its treasury in an efficient and short way.

17.05.2016 Views

andom, involved, and determine the cash receipts and disbursements. Based on these considerations many models were built by the company’s financial managers: The Director of the Financial Direction and the Treasurer, to determine the optimal amount of cash to hold and define its management. If these management of cash effort are always the same fundamental objective (ensuring better safety for the greatest possible profitability), they differ on many points: the choice of the simplifying assumptions of real business inside the company, the use of the mathematical tools of investigation, etc. No monetary cash management model retains all the decision factors we have previously analyzed. The inaccuracy of responses bring these models precisely depends on the translation of data in transaction and their treatment. The limits of the management of cash in terms of stocks. All models responded only imperfectly to the questions posed by the resolution of the cash flow problems. Of course, at the level of concepts and their formulation their contribution is not negligible. They have, indeed, highlighted a number of relations, procedures, treatments and investigative tools useful in the decision-making. Thus, the cost of idle funds and the cost of failure of cash provide two guides effective management for the Treasurer. Similarly, optimization, simulation, and probability are other instruments at the disposal of the person in charge. However, each model ignores some important aspects of liquidity management and focuses on others who do not fully replicate reality. In addition, they have never been the subject sufficiently rigorous experimental verifications. Derived from reflections on the "theory of the demand for money by firms", they are ultimately as "simple analytical curiosities." The analogy with inventory management models remains very limited both to explain the rational training of cash Stock Cash only to describe the rational realization of the financing of the cash Supply. We will try to show the shortcomings of these management models in two respects: That the concept of cash liquidity And that of the financing of the cash 1 - THE CONCEPT OF 'CASH-RESERVE' RETHINK. The increasing sophistication of the models is accompanied by the gradual replacement of the objective "optimal financing" than "the optimal cash. First, no empirical assay was able to demonstrate the existence of a cash incorporated for reasons of "reserve". Then the practice business teaches that there are other means of protection against liquidity difficulties. 1.1. THE FAILURES OF ANALYSIS TO PROVE THE EXISTENCE OF RESERVES INSIDE IWACO’S TREASURY All the analyzing work inside the treasury tend to show that the level of cash is function of the rate of interest and the volume of transactions. More specifically, the demand for money would vary inversely to the rate of interest and would be subject to economies of scale. 1 - The nature of the project research on the demand for money. While I was making this project inside the company, I tried to analyze the typology of work that is done inside the treasury department and compare it with all the academic knowledge that I have learned, then I came to the the conclusion that many sectorial studies attempted to prove the existence of economies of scale in the detention of liquidity as well as its relationship to the rate of interest. Page 58 of 124

(a) Economies of scale in the detention of liquidity. By adopting an approach in terms of inventory management could think a priori, for any industrial area studied, the variance of fluctuations in the level of cash should tend to increase less than proportionally to the volume of sales, and thus to strengthen the presumption of economies of scale. In fact the results are quite heterogeneous and cannot draw any conclusion. b) The rate of interest and the detention of liquidity. Most statistical studies find an elasticity of the demand for money from the interest rate. Despite this fact, which could infer that the detention of balances is the result of rational choice, they cannot explain the formation of cash totally or partly non - voluntary. According to how the INFLOWS and CASH is managed inside the treasury department, the detention of cash is a much more complex phenomenon that the empirical and theoretical research don’t assume 2 – THE COMPLEXITY OF CASH INFLOWS CONCEPT The failure of the work to demonstrate the existence of a rational behavior in determining the level of cash is not enough to make us reject the analysis in terms of stocks. Indeed, the models claim that define changes in the volume of the freely chosen portion of the cash. However, certain balances do not result from the economic calculation; these are: The balances resulting from the inertia of the Treasurer; The cash coming from the imperfect synchronization of receipts and expenditures; The balances that exist because money can be spent, or that there are Free of engagements; 'Institutional' balances, such as the minimum deposit kept with banks. Many factors determine therefore the formation of cash. And even as regards cash 'voluntary', although other strategic elements that those retained in the models, will affect the detention of liquidity (banking costs, inflation, exchange rate risk, etc.) It is therefore the normative value of the models that should be assessed in the light of habits and cash management practices, but also possible improvements possible. In fact, the practice business shows that the dis-synchronization of flows (transaction on the one hand pattern), and the risk of unforeseen expenses (precautionary pattern) on the other hand, can be compensated by different measures of detention of cash. 1.2- DESYNCHRONIZATION OF CASH FLOW AND LIQUIDITY DETENTION. The hypothesis of the company which retains a certain amount of money immediately available to deal with all instant expenditure that it must or wish to achieve at any given time must be reconsidered. Although at first glance it may be tempting to consider the cash flow of a business as a stock of goods, the logic of the cash management is another. The confusion stems from improper comparison that some authors have made between the cash of a firm management and the management of the stock of currency of a financial institution. As it was mentioned at the beginning of this project; the company “IWACO” built another financial part of its activities. This activity’s mission is to handle the Cash exchange inside the country in a legal frame called “CASH- PLUS”. For the treasury department, the management of this activity requires a certain separation between the cash-flows available inside the company’s Treasury. So for example, a post office is required to pay to view, to the subscribers whom are registered in this office, the amount of bank chrges that are presented. It is same for a bank deposit, or a company’s savings. For the CASH-PLUS activity, at the beginning of each day, this represents a potential request for Page 59 of 124

(a) Economies <strong>of</strong> scale in <strong>the</strong> detention <strong>of</strong> liquidity.<br />

By adopting an approach in terms <strong>of</strong> inventory management could think a priori, for any industrial area studied, <strong>the</strong><br />

variance <strong>of</strong> fluctuations in <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> <strong>cash</strong> should tend to increase less than proportionally to <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> sales,<br />

and thus to streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> presumption <strong>of</strong> economies <strong>of</strong> scale. In fact <strong>the</strong> results are quite heterogeneous and cannot<br />

draw any conclusion.<br />

b) The rate <strong>of</strong> interest and <strong>the</strong> detention <strong>of</strong> liquidity.<br />

Most statistical studies find an elasticity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> demand for money from <strong>the</strong> interest rate. Despite this fact, which<br />

could infer that <strong>the</strong> detention <strong>of</strong> balances is <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> rational choice, <strong>the</strong>y cannot explain <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>cash</strong><br />

totally or partly non - voluntary. According to how <strong>the</strong> INFLOWS and CASH is managed inside <strong>the</strong> treasury<br />

department, <strong>the</strong> detention <strong>of</strong> <strong>cash</strong> is a much more complex phenomenon that <strong>the</strong> empirical and <strong>the</strong>oretical research<br />

don’t assume<br />

2 – THE COMPLEXITY OF CASH INFLOWS CONCEPT<br />

The failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work to demonstrate <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> a rational behavior in determining <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> <strong>cash</strong> is not<br />

enough to make us reject <strong>the</strong> analysis in terms <strong>of</strong> stocks. Indeed, <strong>the</strong> models claim that define changes in <strong>the</strong> volume<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> freely chosen portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>cash</strong>. However, certain balances do not result from <strong>the</strong> economic calculation;<br />

<strong>the</strong>se are:<br />

The balances resulting from <strong>the</strong> inertia <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasurer;<br />

The <strong>cash</strong> coming from <strong>the</strong> imperfect synchronization <strong>of</strong> receipts and expenditures;<br />

The balances that exist because money can be spent, or that <strong>the</strong>re are Free <strong>of</strong> engagements;<br />

'Institutional' balances, such as <strong>the</strong> minimum deposit kept with banks.<br />

Many factors determine <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>cash</strong>. And even as regards <strong>cash</strong> 'voluntary', although o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

strategic elements that those retained in <strong>the</strong> models, will affect <strong>the</strong> detention <strong>of</strong> liquidity (banking costs, inflation,<br />

exchange rate risk, etc.) It is <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> normative value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> models that should be assessed in <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> habits<br />

and <strong>cash</strong> management practices, but also possible improvements possible. In fact, <strong>the</strong> practice business shows that<br />

<strong>the</strong> dis-synchronization <strong>of</strong> <strong>flow</strong>s (transaction on <strong>the</strong> one hand pattern), and <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> unforeseen expenses<br />

(precautionary pattern) on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, can be compensated by different measures <strong>of</strong> detention <strong>of</strong> <strong>cash</strong>.<br />

1.2- DESYNCHRONIZATION OF CASH FLOW AND LIQUIDITY DETENTION.<br />

The hypo<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company which retains a certain amount <strong>of</strong> money immediately available to deal with all<br />

instant expenditure that it must or wish to achieve at any given time must be reconsidered. Although at first glance<br />

it may be tempting to consider <strong>the</strong> <strong>cash</strong> <strong>flow</strong> <strong>of</strong> a business as a stock <strong>of</strong> goods, <strong>the</strong> logic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>cash</strong> management is<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r. The confusion stems from improper comparison that some authors have made between <strong>the</strong> <strong>cash</strong> <strong>of</strong> a firm<br />

management and <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stock <strong>of</strong> currency <strong>of</strong> a financial institution.<br />

As it was mentioned at <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> this project; <strong>the</strong> company “IWACO” built ano<strong>the</strong>r financial part <strong>of</strong> its<br />

activities. This activity’s mission is to handle <strong>the</strong> Cash exchange inside <strong>the</strong> country in a legal frame called “CASH-<br />

PLUS”.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> treasury department, <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> this activity requires a certain separation between <strong>the</strong> <strong>cash</strong>-<strong>flow</strong>s<br />

available inside <strong>the</strong> company’s Treasury. So for example, a post <strong>of</strong>fice is required to pay to view, to <strong>the</strong> subscribers<br />

whom are registered in this <strong>of</strong>fice, <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> bank chrges that are presented. It is same for a bank deposit, or a<br />

company’s savings. For <strong>the</strong> CASH-PLUS activity, at <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> each day, this represents a potential request for<br />

Page 59 <strong>of</strong> 124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!