14.05.2016 Views

ARTS OF INDIA

1V1JGg0

1V1JGg0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PROPERTY FROM THE COLLECTION <strong>OF</strong> JOHN ROBERT ALDERMAN AND THE LATE DR.<br />

MARK ZEBROWSKI<br />

14<br />

A RARE AND LARGE TENT CANOPY PANEL<br />

MUGHAL DECCAN, CENTRAL <strong>INDIA</strong>, FIRST HALF 18TH CENTURY<br />

Composed of thirteen triangular panels, each printed with an elegant spray<br />

bearing white fower heads rising from a globular vase, on garnet ground, the<br />

borders with continuous foral garlands between two bands of chevrons<br />

73 x 231in. (185.5 x 597cm.)<br />

£15,000-20,000 $22,000-28,000<br />

€19,000-25,000<br />

This impressive tent canopy panel was made for a princely or royal tent.<br />

The lavish decoration of these tents would refect the royal wealth and the<br />

majesty of the king’s presence and they were favoured by Mughal rulers who<br />

saw these as part of their Central Asian heritage. It is under Akbar that tents<br />

with peaked roofs seem to develop – in Abu Fazl’s Chronicle of Akbar’s reign,<br />

he notes that they are ‘an excellent dwelling place, a shelter from heat and<br />

cold [..] as the ornament of royalty’. The spectacular display of a tent that<br />

once belonged to Tipu Sultan, probably made in Burhanpur, Deccan, circa<br />

1725-50 and recently reconstructed for The Fabric of India exhibition at the<br />

Victoria and Albert Museum, London, gave an impressive illustration of what<br />

these tents would have looked like (Rosemary Crill (ed.), The Fabric of India,<br />

exhibition catalogue, London, 2015, cat. 131, pp.124-126). The ‘Tipu’ Tent<br />

ofers a close comparable example to the present piece, with a peaked roof<br />

of triangular panels, each with three facets and decorated with foral sprays<br />

rising from vases.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!