08.12.2012 Views

MALARIA ELIMINATION IN ZANZIBAR - Soper Strategies

MALARIA ELIMINATION IN ZANZIBAR - Soper Strategies

MALARIA ELIMINATION IN ZANZIBAR - Soper Strategies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(Figure 15). The previously reported statistics for IRS and LL<strong>IN</strong><br />

coverage mask the variability in these measures across the islands.<br />

Looking at individual districts, ITN coverage ranges from a high<br />

of 82% in Mkoani down to only 44% in North B. Two of the<br />

three districts with prevalence greater than 1% in the last ZMCP<br />

survey also reported less than 60% of the population sleeping<br />

under treated nets (Wete with 54% and Micheweni with 49%).<br />

These districts are at high risk of reversing the gains made against<br />

malaria if high IRS coverage is not maintained to compensate for<br />

the low net coverage. More specific modeling using shehia-specific<br />

prevalence information will result in more precise estimates.<br />

It should be noted that the picture of malaria in Zanzibar is more<br />

complicated than illustrated in these relatively simple models.<br />

The model outputs described here assume a closed system–that is,<br />

they do not yet take into account the number of imported cases<br />

26<br />

Box 2: Primaquine<br />

ACTs and other first line malaria drugs kill the asexual bloodstage<br />

parasites that cause fever and chronic infections but<br />

they leave the mature gametocytes, the sexual stages of the<br />

parasite that are infectious to mosquitoes. Patients treated<br />

with ACTs can therefore still transmit malaria (Reeder et al.,<br />

2009). In some situations, first-line treatment alone, even<br />

if high fractions of new infections are detected and treated,<br />

might not be sufficient to achieve elimination necessitating<br />

additional treatment with primaquine to cure gametocyte<br />

infections.<br />

Primaquine has been used safely and effectively in thousands<br />

of patients, but it should be used with great caution because<br />

there is a risk of hemolysis in persons with the genetic defect<br />

glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency<br />

(Capellini and Fiorelli, 2008). Symptoms are rare in those<br />

with modest G6PD deficiency but in those with severe<br />

deficiencies there is a risk of major hemolytic episodes that<br />

can on occasion lead to severe anemia and acute renal failure<br />

(Reeve et al., 1992). All individuals who are treated with<br />

primaquine should therefore be tested for G6PD deficiency<br />

first, and since it is not possible to test a fetus, pregnant<br />

women should not be treated at all.<br />

Primaquine’s main benefit is that it kills mature gametocytes<br />

but the drug has a very short half-life and is cleared from<br />

the bloodstream after a few days. Gametocytes on the other<br />

hand take about 8 days to mature, and effect of primaquine<br />

on maturing gametocytes is not known. Primaquine given<br />

at the time of treatment might therefore not kill mature<br />

gametocytes unless it is given about 7 days after the clinical<br />

episode of malaria. To be effective, primaquine might require<br />

a follow-up treatment 7 days after the primary episode.<br />

We recommend that Zanzibar considers adding G6PD<br />

testing + primaquine on a 7-day follow-up visit to<br />

their outbreak response regimen and to reduce malaria<br />

transmission in residual transmission foci in the end phases<br />

of malaria elimination.<br />

occurring each year. The initial estimates described above suggest<br />

that there are a considerable, although still unknown, number<br />

of parasitaemic individuals traveling to the islands. Inclusion of<br />

these cases could substantially increase the time required to reach<br />

elimination. As such, it is clear that a robust surveillance system<br />

will be essential to promptly identifying imported cases, treating<br />

them, and sustaining elimination in the current environment. If<br />

imported cases are identified and treated promptly, before they<br />

can lead to infected mosquitoes, they will not affect the overall<br />

malaria risk in Zanzibar. In the absence of such a system or a<br />

dramatic natural decline in imported infections (e.g., due to<br />

control measures on the mainland), it will not be possible to<br />

achieve elimination.<br />

In summary, mathematical modeling indicates that malaria<br />

elimination in Zanzibar is feasible given the currently existing<br />

tools. However, achieving it will require maintaining high<br />

effective coverage of the vector control interventions across the<br />

island. At present, coverage by bed nets alone is too low to achieve<br />

elimination. Coverage by IRS is quite high at present, and the<br />

redundancy of coverage by both interventions provides a safety<br />

net. However, the expense of maintaining both interventions over<br />

the next decade may be prohibitive, and IRS can be discontinued<br />

if ITNs are scaled-up to a high proportion of the population,<br />

ideally universal coverage with > 80% usage. Finally, given the<br />

constant risk of importation, a strong surveillance system must<br />

be developed.<br />

CAN <strong>ELIM<strong>IN</strong>ATION</strong> BE SUSTA<strong>IN</strong>ED?<br />

Elimination will not mean the end of malaria in Zanzibar. As<br />

detailed in the section on importation risk above, infected<br />

individuals will continue traveling into the country, although it<br />

is hoped that these numbers will decrease over time as control<br />

measures on the mainland succeed in decreasing prevalence<br />

there. Mosquitoes will bite some of these individuals, and some<br />

measure of transmission will likely result. The WHO defines<br />

an “introduced” case as the product of “first-generation local<br />

transmission; epidemiologically linked to a proven imported<br />

case,” (WHO, 2007) and indicates that both they and secondgeneration<br />

transmission (an imported case leads to infection of<br />

an introduced case, which in turn leads to the infection of a<br />

second-generation case) may occur even in countries certified as<br />

having eliminated malaria:<br />

“Because certification is the recognition of a considerable<br />

operational achievement, countries will remain listed as having<br />

achieved malaria elimination even if they subsequently suffer a<br />

temporary occurrence of local transmission. An indication of<br />

the re-establishment of transmission would be the occurrence of<br />

three or more introduced and/or indigenous malaria infections<br />

linked in space and time to local mosquito-borne transmission<br />

in the same geographical focus, for two consecutive years for P.<br />

falciparum, and for three consecutive years for P. vivax.” (WHO,<br />

2007).<br />

The goal of preventing reemergence of malaria following<br />

elimination is thus not to prevent every single case 6 of malaria,<br />

6 A case is defined as a person infected with the malaria parasite whether<br />

symptomatic or not.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!