08.12.2012 Views

MALARIA ELIMINATION IN ZANZIBAR - Soper Strategies

MALARIA ELIMINATION IN ZANZIBAR - Soper Strategies

MALARIA ELIMINATION IN ZANZIBAR - Soper Strategies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NUMBER OF <strong>IN</strong>FECTED <strong>IN</strong>DIVIDUALS<br />

achieved or malaria resurges. Once effective coverage of greater<br />

than 60% of the population is reached, further increases in<br />

coverage will reduce the time required to reach elimination.<br />

Using the model, we can estimate the time required to reach zero<br />

malaria and the predicted paths in Zanzibar under three different<br />

levels of effective coverage (Figure 15, see also Smith and Hay, 2009).<br />

The blue line illustrates a scenario in which every single individual<br />

in Zanzibar is completely protected from mosquito bites–a “best<br />

case” that is extremely unlikely. If such universal protection could<br />

hypothetically be achieved, R C would equal 0, which means that<br />

each case of malaria would produce zero additional cases.<br />

In other words, there would be no ongoing transmission in the<br />

islands. This perfect coverage would produce the fastest path to<br />

achieve elimination. In such a scenario, the expected number of<br />

infected people would decline by approximately 84% each year;<br />

optimistically, fewer than 10 endemic cases would remain in<br />

Unguja after three years, and fewer than 10 endemic cases would<br />

remain in Pemba after four years. As such, even the “best case”<br />

scenario indicates that Zanzibar will not succeed in eliminating<br />

malaria immediately.<br />

FIGURE 15: EXPECTED TIME TO ACHIEVE <strong>ELIM<strong>IN</strong>ATION</strong> UNDER<br />

THREE CONTROL SCENARIOS<br />

10,000<br />

9,000<br />

8,000<br />

7,000<br />

6,000<br />

5,000<br />

4,000<br />

3,000<br />

2,000<br />

1,000<br />

0<br />

ARROWS <strong>IN</strong>DICATE APPROXIMATE YEAR <strong>ELIM<strong>IN</strong>ATION</strong> IS<br />

PREDICTED UNDER EACH LEVEL OF CONTROL<br />

2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024 2027 2030<br />

YEARS<br />

COMPLETE CONTROL (RC=0, OR 100% EFFECTIVE COVERAGE)<br />

PARTIAL CONTROL (RC=0.5, OR EFFECTIVE COVERAGE AROUND 75%)<br />

SLIGHT CONTROL (RC=0.75, OR EFFECTIVE COVERAGE AROUND 65%)<br />

In reality, effective coverage is not at 100% and is unlikely ever<br />

to reach it (100% effective coverage would mean that every single<br />

individual was protected by interventions like nets or IRS, and<br />

that the protection conferred by those interventions was absolute).<br />

Figure 15 also depicts two scenarios in which partial effective<br />

coverage is attained. The red line depicts the rate at which<br />

Zanzibar would eliminate malaria if R C=0.5, a transmission level<br />

achievable if effective coverage of approximately 75% is achieved.<br />

Under this situation, elimination could be attained by around<br />

2020. Finally, the green line depicts a scenario in which effective<br />

coverage is only around 65%; such coverage leads to R C of about<br />

0.75 and elimination only after two decades. Effective coverage<br />

levels lower than 65% will be insufficient if Zanzibar chooses to<br />

attempt elimination.<br />

These same models can also be used to evaluate the number<br />

of malaria cases that would occur in Zanzibar due to onward<br />

transmission from inevitable imported cases. To illustrate how<br />

these additional infections would affect the above estimates of<br />

elimination feasibility, it is worth considering the following<br />

example. Suppose 30,000 Zanzibar citizens return to Zanzibar<br />

each month from trips to the mainland and that 1% of them<br />

acquire malaria abroad. At this rate, approximately 300 cases<br />

of malaria will be imported into Zanzibar each month, or<br />

approximately 3,600 a year. If R C = 0.5, there will be an<br />

additional 1,800 cases from onward transmission, for a total of<br />

5,400 new malaria cases each year. This figure would account for<br />

a substantial fraction of the current number of people of malaria<br />

currently infected on the islands, and it would suggest that the<br />

number of imported malaria cases is one of the most critical<br />

numbers to estimate before it is possible to estimate confidently<br />

the likelihood of future progress.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

1 | Technical Feasibility<br />

According to the most recent ZMCP survey, Zanzibar has<br />

achieved high levels of net use by children under five and pregnant<br />

women (74% and 73% in 2007, respectively). In comparison,<br />

roughly 60% of the general population reported sleeping under a<br />

treated net. In addition, IRS campaigns are reaching even higher<br />

proportions of the population. Of houses visited for the survey,<br />

95.4% had been sprayed with insecticide during the previous six<br />

months. Although data on the overlap between the population<br />

using nets and receiving IRS is not presently available, the<br />

combination of these two control activities may result in higher<br />

overall effective coverage.<br />

If such high IRS coverage levels can be maintained, and if they<br />

can remain effective, these exceptional levels of coverage could<br />

put Zanzibar on a course to follow a trajectory more similar to<br />

the red or blue curves in Figure 10 than the slow green one, and<br />

elimination could be achieved within the next decade. However,<br />

without the coverage by IRS, effective coverage would revert to<br />

the approximately 60% general coverage by ITNs. As discussed<br />

above, 60% coverage probably equates to an R C value of close to<br />

one; as such, elimination will not be achieved at these levels.<br />

Because the model does not discriminate at present between<br />

nets and spraying, the outputs described here indicate that the<br />

higher IRS coverage renders the lower net coverage irrelevant. It<br />

would be a mistake to conclude from this apparent redundancy<br />

that bed nets could be scaled back as long as IRS is maintained.<br />

For one thing, development of resistance or behavioral change<br />

in mosquitoes could greatly reduce the effective coverage by<br />

IRS. Without the additional protection of nets, loss of effective<br />

coverage due to resistance to IRS would result in a high R C and<br />

subsequent risk of a rapid resurgence in transmission.<br />

Additionally, there is considerable heterogeneity in both<br />

malaria risk and intervention coverage on Zanzibar that must<br />

be considered when examining the potential for elimination<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!