08.12.2012 Views

MALARIA ELIMINATION IN ZANZIBAR - Soper Strategies

MALARIA ELIMINATION IN ZANZIBAR - Soper Strategies

MALARIA ELIMINATION IN ZANZIBAR - Soper Strategies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

undertaken with support of the Karolinska Institute showed<br />

no significant parasite resistance to AS-AQ and Coartem® with<br />

clinical and parasitological response over 98.5% (Prof Anders<br />

Björkman, personal communication).<br />

THE <strong>ZANZIBAR</strong> <strong>MALARIA</strong> STRATEGIC PLAN<br />

The overall objective of the Malaria Strategic Plan for Zanzibar<br />

(2007-2012) (ZMCP, 2007) is to reduce the malaria incidence<br />

by 70% from the 2006 baseline by 2012. Because of the low<br />

prevalence already achieved, the plan also aims at early detection<br />

to avoid epidemics or resurgence of malaria. To achieve this<br />

ultimate goal, five specific objectives have been put forward:<br />

14<br />

1. To prevent infection with malaria by reaching and<br />

maintaining coverage of ITNs/LL<strong>IN</strong>s at above 80% for<br />

pregnant women and children under 5 years, complemented<br />

by other vector control methods<br />

2. To ensure effective case management by providing prompt<br />

access for all to parasitological diagnosis (by microscopy or<br />

rapid diagnostic test) and ACT<br />

3. To prevent and control malaria in pregnancy, by increasing<br />

and maintaining coverage of IPTp to 80% in both private and<br />

public health sectors (at least two doses of SP) by promoting<br />

the regular and correct use of LL<strong>IN</strong>s<br />

4. To provide effective epidemic preparedness and response, by<br />

ensuring that for > 90% of health facilities, reports are on<br />

time, investigation of reported epidemics is initiated within<br />

24 hours and supplies are at hand to mount a response if<br />

necessary<br />

5. To assess the potential for sustainable elimination of malaria<br />

from Zanzibar, using newly available data from surveillance<br />

and operational research, as well as experience from<br />

implementation<br />

These specific objectives are to be supported by complementary<br />

strategies on communication, management and coordination,<br />

monitoring and evaluation, operational research and surveillance.<br />

Although the current strategic plan does not aim for malaria<br />

elimination, one of the specific objectives is to assess the potential<br />

for sustainable elimination. As such, the preparation of an<br />

assessment on the feasibility of malaria elimination is in line with<br />

the national strategic plan.<br />

HISTORY OF <strong>MALARIA</strong> CONTROL <strong>IN</strong> <strong>ZANZIBAR</strong><br />

Historically, malaria has been a major public health, social and<br />

economic problem in Zanzibar, with the exception of a short<br />

period during the malaria eradication program from 1958 to<br />

1968. In the mid-1920’s, an early document on the epidemiology<br />

of malaria in Unguja reported a parasite prevalence of 68%<br />

among children 1-6 years of age (Manfield-Aders, 1927). In the<br />

1930’s and 1950’s similar parasite prevalences were found in<br />

both Unguja and Pemba, but after that parasite rates have shown<br />

fluctuations mainly related to different malaria control efforts.<br />

Before World War II environmental management, chemical<br />

larviciding and quinine distributions to schoolchildren were the<br />

main malaria control intervention tools in Zanzibar. Larvivorous<br />

fish and mosquito nets were also used but with limited<br />

success. After World War II spraying activities with DDT and<br />

dieldrin were started. In 1961 the malaria control program was<br />

upgraded to an eradication program. The eradication program<br />

continued the bi-annual cycles of IRS with dieldrin and started<br />

mass distribution of amodiaquine and primaquine resulting<br />

in community parasite prevalences below 5%. However, the<br />

eradication program failed to interrupt transmission, which<br />

was blamed on technical, administrative and operational<br />

shortcomings (Delfini, 1969). The eradication program was<br />

terminated in 1968, though malaria control activities continued,<br />

largely through the support of community volunteers. By the late<br />

1970s, parasite prevalence had again increased to around 40% on<br />

Unguja (Matola, 1984).<br />

In 1984, Zanzibar assisted by USAID, launched a five-year<br />

project to control malaria to a level where it no longer would<br />

be a major public health problem (Minjas et al., 1989). The<br />

main strategies included DDT spraying and chloroquine<br />

administration through dispensaries. Results, however, were poor<br />

due to inadequate coverage and operational problems similar to<br />

the eradication period. In the 1990’s funding for malaria control<br />

was limited. Nevertheless, in 1993 the new global strategy for<br />

malaria control was adopted emphasizing prompt and effective<br />

malaria treatment rather than IRS. This strategy was, however,<br />

highly hampered by increasing resistance to chloroquine. The<br />

start of the Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria<br />

(GFATM) and the President’s Malaria Initiative (PMI) marked<br />

a new era in malaria control for Zanzibar with a consistently<br />

well-funded program since 2002 resulting in the above described<br />

reduction in the malaria burden to date.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!