12.04.2016 Views

Biotech financing

25WmEet

25WmEet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Slowdown ahead?<br />

Since the US garners the vast majority of all biotech <strong>financing</strong><br />

(86% in 2015), it makes sense to view it as a proxy for the<br />

overall health of the industry. And signs of a financial slowdown<br />

are readily available.<br />

In the fourth quarter of 2015, for instance, activity decelerated<br />

significantly in nearly every fundraising category except venture<br />

capital, which held remarkably steady throughout the year.<br />

Fourth quarter IPO activity shrank appreciably: biotechs raised<br />

US$1.4 billion via 11 offerings in the third quarter, but in the<br />

fourth quarter, newly public biotechs raised only US$497 million<br />

across eight deals. Most ominously, no biotechs went public,<br />

in the US or anywhere else, during December 2015 and<br />

January 2016.<br />

The drop in follow-on offerings was even more pronounced:<br />

in the third quarter, biotechs pulled in US$4.4 billion across<br />

48 deals, but in the fourth quarter, that fell to US$1.2 billion<br />

across 27 deals. Debt practically vanished, too, but the third<br />

quarter’s total was unusually high as a result of US$24 billion<br />

raised by stalwarts Gilead Sciences, Biogen and Celgene.<br />

In this environment,<br />

the question to ask<br />

isn’t whether the<br />

climate is changing,<br />

but just how long this<br />

winter will last.<br />

Beyond borders 2016 — <strong>Biotech</strong> <strong>financing</strong><br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!