10.04.2016 Views

Biblical Hermeneutics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PRINCIPLES OF BIBLICAL HERMENETICS ; M. M. NINAN<br />

that it cannot be understood apart from complex academic analysis as is typical in the<br />

historical-critical method of interpretation.<br />

<strong>Biblical</strong> literalists believe that, unless a passage is clearly intended as allegory, poetry, or<br />

some other genre, the Bible should be interpreted as literal statements by the author. Who<br />

may appropriately decide when a passage is allegorical or literal, however, is not defined.<br />

Fundamentalists typically treat as simple history, according to its plain sense, such passages<br />

as the Genesis account of creation, the deluge and Noah's ark, and the unnaturally long lifespans<br />

of the patriarchs given in genealogies of Genesis, as well as the strict historicity of the<br />

narrative accounts of Ancient Israel, the supernatural interventions of God in history, and<br />

Jesus' miracles. Literalism does not question that parables, metaphors and allegory exist in<br />

the Bible, but rather relies on contextual interpretations based on the author's intention.<br />

As a part of Chicago Statement on <strong>Biblical</strong> Inerrancy, conservative Christian scholarship<br />

affirms the following:<br />

"WE AFFIRM the necessity of interpreting the Bible according to its literal, or normal, sense.<br />

The literal sense is the grammatical-historical sense, that is, the meaning which the writer<br />

expressed. Interpretation according to the literal sense will take account of all figures of<br />

speech and literary forms found in the text. WE DENY the legitimacy of any approach to<br />

Scripture that attributes to it meaning which the literal sense does not support."<br />

Noted inerrantist Norman Geisler in his commentary on the Chicago Statement on <strong>Biblical</strong><br />

<strong>Hermeneutics</strong> states:<br />

"The literal sense of Scripture is strongly affirmed here. To be sure the English word literal<br />

carries some problematic connotations with it. Hence the words normal and grammaticalhistorical<br />

are used to explain what is meant. The literal sense is also designated by the more<br />

descriptive title grammatical-historical sense. This means the correct interpretation is the one<br />

which discovers the meaning of the text in its grammatical forms and in the historical,<br />

cultural context in which the text is expressed."<br />

The Westminster Confession of Faith, written in 1647, offers what may be taken as a<br />

"doctrinal statement" concerning the perspicuity of Scripture:<br />

"All things in Scripture are not alike plain in themselves, nor alike clear unto all; yet those<br />

things which are necessary to be known, believed, and observed, for salvation, are so clearly<br />

propounded and opened in some place of Scripture or other, that not only the learned, but<br />

the unlearned, in a due use of the ordinary means, may attain unto a sufficient<br />

understanding of them."<br />

Steve Falkenberg, professor of religious psychology at Eastern Kentucky University,<br />

observes:<br />

"I've never met anyone who actually believes the Bible is literally true. I know a bunch of<br />

people who say they believe the Bible is literally true but nobody is actually a literalist. Taken<br />

literally, the Bible says the earth is flat and sitting on pillars and cannot move (Ps 93:1, Ps<br />

96:10, 1 Sam 2:8, Job 9:6). It says that great sea monsters are set to guard the edge of the<br />

sea (Job 41, Ps 104:26)."<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!